Integrating Leadership in Job Demand Resources (JD-R) for Personal Performance in Military Institution
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2. Materials and Methods
- Theoretical model development based on [18] supported by a series of scientific explorations;
- Showing causality relationships with path diagrams;
- Choosing maximum likelihood (ML) for model estimation. The assumption of normality was fulfilled, and the sample size was between 200–500. ML estimation involved selecting parameter values that maximized the likelihood of the observed data given to the model. ML estimators have desirable asymptotic properties, such as consistency, normality, and efficiency. ML estimation allows for hypothesis testing using likelihood ratio tests, which can be used to compare the goodness of fit of different models. There are no outliers, either univariate or multivariate;
- Assessing identification problems;
- Evaluating, interpreting, and improving the model based on modification indices values.
3. Results
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Practical Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Farrukh, M.; Ansari, N.; Raza, A.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H. Fostering employee’s pro-environmental behavior through green transformational leadership, green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 179, 121643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Wu, Z. How to facilitate employees’ green behavior? The joint role of green human resource management practice and green transformational leadership. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 906869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Guo, Z.; Deng, B.; Wang, B. Unlocking the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employees’ green behaviour: A cultural self-representation perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 382, 134857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, J.; Liu, H.; Chin, T.; Hu, D. The continuous mediating effects of GHRM on employees’ green passion via transformational leadership and green creativity. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, J.; Yin, K.; Hou, N.; Zou, Y.; Nie, Q. How to facilitate employee green behavior: The joint role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management practice. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2020, 52, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali Ababneh, O.M.; Awwad, A.S.; Abu-Haija, A. The association between green human resources practices and employee engagement with environmental initiatives in hotels: The moderation effect of perceived transformational leadership. J. Hum. Resour. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 20, 390–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K.; Del Giudice, M.; Chierici, R.; Graziano, D. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; El Askary, A.; Meo, M.S.; ul Ain Zafar, N.; Hussain, B. Green transformational leadership and environmental performance in small and medium enterprises. Econ. Res. Istraživanja 2022, 35, 5273–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Hasanein, A.; Gharbi, H.; Abu Elnasr, A.E. Going Green Together: Effects of Green Transformational Leadership on Employee Green Behaviour and Environmental Performance in the Saudi Food Industry. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inceoglu, I.; Thomas, G.; Chu, C.; Plans, D.; Gerbasi, A. Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. Leadersh. Q. 2018, 29, 179–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaltiainen, J.; Hakanen, J. Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 2022, 25, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B. Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Dev. Int. 2015, 20, 446–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adil, A.; Kamal, A. Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 2020, 23, 734–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.; Zhang, R.P.; Cui, Q.; Hsu, S.-C. The antecedents of safety leadership: The job demands-resources model. Saf. Sci. 2021, 133, 104979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katou, A.A.; Koupkas, M.; Triantafillidou, E. Job demands-resources model, transformational leadership and organizational performance: A multilevel study. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2021, 71, 2704–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daraba, D.; Wirawan, H.; Salam, R.; Faisal, M. Working from home during the corona pandemic: Investigating the role of authentic leadership, psychological capital, and gender on employee performance. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1885573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tummers, L.G.; Bakker, A.B. Leadership and job demands-resources theory: A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 722080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; de Vries, J.D. Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping 2021, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransen, K.; McEwan, D.; Sarkar, M. The impact of identity leadership on team functioning and well-being in team sport: Is psychological safety the missing link? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2020, 51, 101763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soni, M. Mediating role of pro-environmental behavior in environmentally specific transformational leadership and subjective well-being. Benchmarking An Int. J. 2022, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. Handbook of Well-Being; DEF Publishers: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, M. Linking high-performance work systems and employee well-being: A multilevel examination of the roles of organisation-based self-esteem and departmental formalisation. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2022, 32, 92–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, R.K.; Hati, L. The measurement of employee well-being: Development and validation of a scale. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2022, 23, 385–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akıncı, G.; Alpkan, L.; Yıldız, B.; Karacay, G. The Link between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in a Military Organization: The Moderating Role of Climate for Innovation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Para-González, L.; Jiménez-Jiménez, D.; Martínez-Lorente, A.R. Exploring the mediating effects between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Empl. Relat. 2018, 40, 412–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.A.; Hunt, A.; Jantan, A.H.; Hashim, H.; Chong, C.W. Exploring challenges and solutions in applying green human resource management practices for the sustainable workplace in the ready-made garment industry in Bangladesh. Bus. Strateg. Dev. 2020, 3, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guest, D.E. Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2017, 27, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marescaux, E.; De Winne, S.; Forrier, A. Developmental HRM, employee well-being and performance: The moderating role of developing leadership. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2019, 16, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van De Voorde, K.; Paauwe, J.; Van Veldhoven, M. Employee well-being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2012, 14, 391–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroy, H.; Segers, J.; Van Dierendonck, D.; Den Hartog, D. Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2018, 28, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas-Vallina, A.; Alegre, J.; López-Cabrales, Á. The challenge of increasing employees’ well-being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 60, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stănciulescu, R.; Beldiman, E. The issue of leadership styles in the military organization. L. Forces Acad. Rev. 2019, 24, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, L.; Bliese, P.; McGurk, D. Military leadership: A context specific review. Leadersh. Q. 2003, 14, 657–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J. How green human resource management can promote green employee behavior in China: A technology acceptance model perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jain, P.; Duggal, T.; Ansari, A.H. Examining the mediating effect of trust and psychological well-being on transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019, 26, 1517–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bass, B.M.; Bass Bernard, M. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Bass, B.M.; Steidlmeier, P. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadersh. Q. 1999, 10, 181–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bass, B.M.; Avolio, B.J. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: MLQ; Sampler Set; Technical Report, Leader Form, Rater Form, and Scoring Key for MLQ Form 5x-Short; Mind Garden: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.; Chen, X.; Zou, Y.; Nie, Q. Environmentally specific transformational leadership and team pro-environmental behaviors: The roles of pro-environmental goal clarity, pro-environmental harmonious passion, and power distance. Hum. Relat. 2021, 74, 1864–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caza, A.; Caza, B.B.; Posner, B.Z. Transformational leadership across cultures: Follower perception and satisfaction. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klaic, A.; Burtscher, M.J.; Jonas, K. Person-supervisor fit, needs-supplies fit, and team fit as mediators of the relationship between dual-focused transformational leadership and well-being in scientific teams. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2018, 27, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amrutha, V.N.; Geetha, S.N. A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, P. Shattered but smiling: Human resource management and the wellbeing of hotel employees during COVID-19. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 93, 102765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, I.; Ullah, K.; Khan, A. The impact of green HRM on green creativity: Mediating role of pro-environmental behaviors and moderating role of ethical leadership style. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 33, 3789–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmeda, U.; Mozammelb, S.; Zamanc, F. Green HRM and green innovation: Can green transformational leadership moderate: Case of pharmaceutical firms in Australia. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 616–617. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J.; Hu, W. Environmentally specific transformational leadership and green product development performance: The role of a green HRM system. Int. J. Manpow. 2022, 43, 639–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, S.; Jiang, K.; Tang, G. Leveraging green HRM for firm performance: The joint effects of CEO environmental belief and external pollution severity and the mediating role of employee environmental commitment. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 61, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, H.; El Irani, M.; Kertechian, K.S. Green HRM and nongreen outcomes: The mediating role of visionary leadership in Asia. Int. J. Manpow. 2022, 43, 660–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarwar, H.; Ishaq, M.I.; Amin, A.; Ahmed, R. Ethical leadership, work engagement, employees’ well-being, and performance: A cross-cultural comparison. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 2008–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kooij, D.T.A.M.; Guest, D.E.; Clinton, M.; Knight, T.; Jansen, P.G.W.; Dikkers, J.S.E. How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2013, 23, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Morrison, A.M.; Zhang, H. Improving millennial employee well-being and task performance in the hospitality industry: The interactive effects of HRM and responsible leadership. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kalshoven, K.; Boon, C.T. Ethical leadership, employee well-being, and helping: The moderating role of human resource management. J. Pers. Psychol. 2012, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauff, S.; Felfe, J.; Klug, K. High-performance work practices, employee well-being, and supportive leadership: Spillover mechanisms and boundary conditions between HRM and leadership behavior. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 33, 2109–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 309–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guerci, M.; Hauff, S.; Gilardi, S. High performance work practices and their associations with health, happiness and relational well-being: Are there any tradeoffs? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 33, 329–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Posner, B.Z.; Kouzes, J.M. Psychometric properties of the leadership practices inventory-updated. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1993, 53, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, E.L. Linking Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Well-Being—A Eudaimonia Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.H.; Ford, P.; Rumsey, M.G.; Pulakos, E.D.; Borman, W.C.; Felker, D.B.; De Vera, M.V.; Riegelhaupt, B.J. Development of multiple job performance measures in a representative sample of jobs. Pers. Psychol. 1990, 43, 277–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viswesvaran, C.; Ones, D.S. Perspectives on models of job performance. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 2000, 8, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate data analysis: Harlow Pearson Education Limited; Pearson: Londou, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wirawan, H.; Jufri, M.; Saman, A. The effect of authentic leadership and psychological capital on work engagement: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2020, 41, 1139–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Construct | Item | Standardized Loading Factor | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Green Transformational Leadership | GTL1 | 0.280 | 0.511 | 0.809 |
GTL2 | 0.825 | |||
GTL3 | 0.602 | |||
GTL4 | 0.845 | |||
GTL5 | 0.849 | |||
Green HR practice | HRP1 | 0.594 | 0.435 | 0.867 |
HRP2 | 0.393 | |||
HRP3 | 0.763 | |||
HRP4 | 0.897 | |||
HRP5 | 0.573 | |||
HRP6 | 0.616 | |||
Employee well-being | EWB1 | 0.758 | 0.620 | 0.898 |
EWB2 | 0.787 | |||
EWB3 | 0.737 | |||
EWB4 | 0.809 | |||
EWB5 | 0.803 | |||
EWB6 | 0.826 | |||
Military Performance | MP1 | 0.824 | 0.664 | 0.9925 |
MP2 | 0.909 | |||
MP3 | 0.864 | |||
MP4 | 0.884 | |||
MP5 | 0.844 | |||
MP6 | 0.886 | |||
MP7 | 0.314 | |||
MP8 | 0.826 |
Stage 1 Results | Improvement Results | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|
Absolut fit measure | |||
p-value (Sig.) | 0.00 | 0.004 | Marginal Fit |
CMIN | 10.969 | 1.344 | Fit |
GFI (Goodness of Fit) | 0.679 | 0.97 | Fit |
RMSEA (Root Mean square Error of Approximation) | 0.131 | 0.024 | Fit |
RMR (Root Mean Square Residual) | 0.202 | 0.033 | Fit |
Incremental fit measure | |||
AGFI (Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index) | 0.62 | 0.95 | Fit |
CFI (Comparative Fit Index) | 0.762 | 0.995 | Fit |
Incremental Fit Index (IFI) | 0.763 | 0.996 | Fit |
Relative Fit Index (RFI) | 0.722 | 0.972 | Fit |
Parsimonious fit measure | |||
PNFI (Parsimonious Normed Fit Index) | 0.683 | 0.600 | Fit |
PGFI (Parsimonious Goodness of Fit Index) | 0.574 | 0.541 | Marginal Fit |
AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) | 3.116 | 413 | Marginal Fit |
CAIC (Consistent Akaike Information Criterion) | 3.385 | 1.015 | Marginal Fit |
Hypothesis | Estimate | p-Value | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|
H1: Green leadership has a positive effect on personnel well-being. | 0.347 | 0.00 | supported |
H2: Green HR practice has a positive effect on personnel well-being. | 0.705 | 0.00 | supported |
H3: Personnel well-being mediates the effect of GTL on performance. | 0.237 | 0.00 | supported |
H4: Personnel well-being mediates the effect of green HR practice on performance. | 0.631 | 0.00 | supported |
H5: HR Practice mediates the effect of GTL on personnel well-being. | 0.370 | 0.00 | supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abdurachman, D.; Ramdhan, R.M.; Karsoma, A.; Winarno, A.; Hermana, D. Integrating Leadership in Job Demand Resources (JD-R) for Personal Performance in Military Institution. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054004
Abdurachman D, Ramdhan RM, Karsoma A, Winarno A, Hermana D. Integrating Leadership in Job Demand Resources (JD-R) for Personal Performance in Military Institution. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054004
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbdurachman, Dudung, Rudy M. Ramdhan, Ateng Karsoma, Alex Winarno, and Deni Hermana. 2023. "Integrating Leadership in Job Demand Resources (JD-R) for Personal Performance in Military Institution" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054004
APA StyleAbdurachman, D., Ramdhan, R. M., Karsoma, A., Winarno, A., & Hermana, D. (2023). Integrating Leadership in Job Demand Resources (JD-R) for Personal Performance in Military Institution. Sustainability, 15(5), 4004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054004