Next Article in Journal
What Is Polluting Delhi’s Air? A Review from 1990 to 2022
Previous Article in Journal
Combining GRA with a Fuzzy QFD Model for the New Product Design and Development of Wickerwork Lamps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Waste Generation Predictions and On-Site Waste Management: A Danish Perspective

1
Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
2
Department of Architecture & Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
3
School of Archtecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran 14395-515, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4207; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054207
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 20 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 26 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Civil Engineering and Construction Waste Management)

Abstract

Multiple methodologies exist for the calculation, estimation, and simulation of waste generation in the construction industry as means for planning and conducting waste management. The reliability and usability of such methods has, nonetheless, not previously been evaluated. This study, therefore, investigated the existing methodologies for waste prediction through a literature review and an analysis of the identified methods using two construction cases from Denmark. Semi-structured interviews were, additionally, utilised to explain how and why waste behaviour is the way it is in the Danish construction industry. The results showed that waste management is affected by multiple factors, which are not reflected in the current methodologies for waste estimation, and that waste behaviour as well as organisational factors are key contributors. In addition, the study concluded that existing estimation methodologies for waste generation tend to be either high in complexity or low in accuracy, limiting the benefits achievable from using them, and that projects of the same type within close proximity can be significantly different from another, highlighting a clear limitation for the development of waste estimation methodologies.
Keywords: waste management; construction management; waste management evaluation; sustainability waste management; construction management; waste management evaluation; sustainability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lindhard, S.M.; Wyke, S.; Mahami, H.; Vaezzadeh, S.S.; Svidt, K. Waste Generation Predictions and On-Site Waste Management: A Danish Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054207

AMA Style

Lindhard SM, Wyke S, Mahami H, Vaezzadeh SS, Svidt K. Waste Generation Predictions and On-Site Waste Management: A Danish Perspective. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lindhard, Søren Munch, Simon Wyke, Hadi Mahami, Seyyed Saeed Vaezzadeh, and Kjeld Svidt. 2023. "Waste Generation Predictions and On-Site Waste Management: A Danish Perspective" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054207

APA Style

Lindhard, S. M., Wyke, S., Mahami, H., Vaezzadeh, S. S., & Svidt, K. (2023). Waste Generation Predictions and On-Site Waste Management: A Danish Perspective. Sustainability, 15(5), 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop