Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Wind Energy
- -
- Environmental impacts
- -
- Social impact
- -
- Economic impact
3. Sustainable Development Goals
3.1. Renewable Energy and SDGs
3.2. Wind Energy Role in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
- Impact on the environment: Wind energy has several impacts on the environment, including habitat destruction, noise pollution, and aesthetic degradation. The number of birds and bats that are killed by wind turbines, the distance between turbines and homes or other sensitive receptors, and the amount of greenhouse gases emitted during the manufacture and transportation of wind energy components are some of the indicators that can be used to evaluate these factors.
- Economic viability: The economic viability of wind energy can be evaluated by taking into consideration a number of factors, including the cost of the energy that is produced, the amount of subsidies that are required, and the return on investment.
- Acceptability to society: The level of community involvement in wind energy projects, public attitudes toward wind energy, and the potential for conflict with other land uses are some of the factors that can be used to evaluate the acceptability of wind energy to society.
- Maturity in terms of technology: The technological maturity of wind energy can be evaluated by considering a number of factors, including the dependability of wind turbines, the effectiveness of energy production, and the possibility of further technological advancements in the near future.
3.3. Case Study: London Array Wind Farm
- No waste or pollution generated from the plant.
- Relatively inexpensive to create.
- Renewable.
- Significant energy produced.
- Reduce carbon emissions by a huge amount in terms of carbon tons.
- Assists the UK in attaining the EU’s 15% renewable energy goal by 2020.
- Local work prospects during the plant’s development and life cycle.
- A massive number of turbines are required to generate a considerable amount of electricity.
- The unpredictable output of the wind turbines, which are affected by wind speed.
- Disruption to marine life.
- Disruption to seabird existence in that location.
- Disturbance to local fishing grounds.
- SDG 1: No poverty. The building and ongoing operation of the London Array wind farm has created employment and other economic possibilities, both of which can contribute to the regional economy’s expansion and growth. In addition, the project has offered financing for community projects via its community fund, which has funded efforts such as education about renewable energy and energy efficiency upgrades for local homes. Moreover, the project has provided funding for community projects. These activities may enhance the economic and social well-being of disadvantaged communities, which can contribute to decreasing poverty in such places.
- SDG 3: Good health and well-being. London Array may assist in minimizing the effects of climate change on human health by lowering the emissions of greenhouse gases. Human health is susceptible to being negatively impacted by climate change in various ways, including increasing temperatures, severe weather events, and other effects. In addition, the decrease in air pollution that results from using wind energy may have a beneficial effect on human health. This is especially true for more susceptible groups, such as children, the elderly, and those who already have one or more preexisting health concern.
- SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy. London Array generates electricity from a renewable energy source, wind, which is considered to be more sustainable and less polluting than fossil fuels such as coal and oil. By providing clean electricity, the London Array helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change, which is a key target of this goal.
- SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth. According to London Array’s website, the wind farm has supported the creation of over 3000 jobs, with over 60% of the work going to UK-based companies.
- SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure: The London Array is a large-scale infrastructure project that requires significant investment and innovation in designing and constructing the wind turbines and offshore substation. The project has also supported the development of the offshore wind industry in the United Kingdom.
- SDG 13: Climate action. As a large offshore wind farm, the London Array is expected to offset approximately 1.9 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year, making it a significant contributor to climate action.
- SDG 14: Life below water. London Array generates electricity from a renewable energy source, wind, which is considered to be more sustainable and less polluting than fossil fuels such as coal and oil. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, London Array can help mitigate climate change’s impacts on the oceans, which is a major threat to marine life. In addition, London Array has supported offshore wind energy development, which may help reduce the demand for fossil fuels and potentially reduce the negative impacts of offshore oil and gas development on marine ecosystems.
- SDG 15: Life on land: London Array can help mitigate the effects of climate change on land-based ecosystems and biodiversity by reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. These ecosystems and species are in danger because of rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and other effects of climate change. In addition, London Array has contributed to the development of offshore wind energy, which may help to reduce the demand for fossil fuels and may help to reduce the negative impacts of the extraction and use of fossil fuels on land-based ecosystems.
3.4. Sustainability Indicators
- Improving the reputation of the company and the image of its brand. Businesses can show their commitment to social and environmental responsibility, as well as attract consumers and stakeholders that place a value on sustainability, by aligning their business practices with the SDGs.
- Companies that address the risks and opportunities presented by sustainability are better prepared to withstand economic and social challenges such as natural disasters, resource constraints, and shifting consumer preferences. These companies have taken steps to reduce risks and increase their resilience.
- SDGs provide a framework that businesses can use to identify and address unmet needs in areas such as healthcare, education, and renewable energy, which can lead to the development of new products and services. One of the benefits of the SDGs is that they create new business opportunities.
- Capacity factor: This is a measure of the efficiency of the wind turbines and was an important KPI for the London Array project because it determined the overall energy output of the wind farm. The capacity factor can be calculated by dividing the total energy output of the wind farm by the total number of wind turbines.
- Accessibility: This metric quantifies the proportion of time that the wind turbines were online and able to produce electricity. In order to achieve the highest possible energy output from the London Array, it was essential to guarantee high availability.
- Maintenance expenses: The London Array required regular maintenance to ensure its continued operation and shorten the amount of time it was offline. As one of the KPIs for the project, the costs of maintenance were closely monitored.
- Production costs: The cost of making electricity was an important KPI because it had a direct effect on the project’s ability to make money. The goal was to maintain a high level of production efficiency while minimizing the costs of production.
- Impact on the environment: The London Array was developed to have as little of an effect as possible on the local wildlife and the surrounding environment. The environmental impact of the project was measured and monitored with the help of KPIs.
- Health and safety: It was of the utmost importance that the health and safety of the workers involved in the construction and maintenance of the wind farm be kept in the highest regard. KPIs were utilized in the process of monitoring and ensuring the workers’ safety.
- Timeline for the project: The London Array was a big, complicated job, and the timeline for finishing it was carefully monitored and managed. KPIs were utilized in order to monitor progress and guarantee that the project would be finished on schedule.
- SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy:
- ○
- Capacity factor: The ratio of the actual electricity generated by the wind farm to the theoretical maximum output if the wind turbines were operating at full capacity all the time. The capacity factor of the London Array is equal to 38.3%, (from https://energynumbers.info/uk-offshore-wind-capacity-factors, accessed on 2 January 2023).
- ○
- Availability: The percentage of time that the wind turbines are able to generate electricity, taking into account planned and unplanned maintenance, equipment failures, and other factors that could cause the turbines to be offline
- ○
- Production: The total amount of electricity generated by the wind farm over a specific period of time, such as a month or a year. The nameplate capacity of the London Array is equal to 630 MW and the annual net output is 3100 GWh, (from https://londonarray.com/, accessed on 2 January 2023).
- SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
- ○
- Revenue: The income generated by the sale of electricity. London Array’s estimated annual revenue is currently $8.2M per year, (from https://growjo.com/company/London_Array, accessed on 2 January 2023).
- SDG 13: Climate action and SDG 15: Life on land
- ○
- Carbon emissions avoided: The reduction in greenhouse gas emissions that is achieved by generating electricity from the wind farm instead of fossil fuel sources. The total carbon emission avoided was 925,000 tons of CO2.
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rahman, M.M.; Khan, I.; Field, D.L.; Techato, K.; Alameh, K. Powering agriculture: Present status, future potential, and challenges of renewable energy applications. Renew. Energy 2022, 188, 731–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal Filho, W.; Balogun, A.-L.; Olayide, O.E.; Azeiteiro, U.M.; Ayal, D.Y.; Muñoz, P.D.C.; Nagy, G.J.; Bynoe, P.; Oguge, O.; Toamukum, N.Y. Assessing the impacts of climate change in cities and their adaptive capacity: Towards transformative approaches to climate change adaptation and poverty reduction in urban areas in a set of developing countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 692, 1175–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olabi, A.G.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 158, 112111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Large scale application of carbon capture to process industries—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Kumar, N.; Vivekadhish, S. Millennium development goals (MDGS) to sustainable development goals (SDGS): Addressing unfinished agenda and strengthening sustainable development and partnership. Indian J. Community Med. 2016, 41, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walsh, P.P.; Murphy, E.; Horan, D. The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 154, 119957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonocore, J.J.; Choma, E.; Villavicencio, A.H.; Spengler, J.D.; Koehler, D.A.; Evans, J.S.; Lelieveld, J.; Klop, P.; Sanchez-Pina, R. Metrics for the sustainable development goals: Renewable energy and transportation. Palgrave Commun. 2019, 5, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Güney, T. Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2019, 26, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, W.; Opoku, A.; Agyekum, K.; Oppon, J.A.; Ahmed, V.; Chen, C.; Lok, K.L. The critical role of the construction industry in achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs): Delivering projects for the common good. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, I.B.; Arduz, F.G.; Buitrago, J.A. SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. In Actioning the Global Goals for Local Impact; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 135–151. [Google Scholar]
- Kynčlová, P.; Upadhyaya, S.; Nice, T. Composite index as a measure on achieving Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG-9) industry-related targets: The SDG-9 index. Appl. Energy 2020, 265, 114755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salam, A. Internet of things for sustainable community development: Introduction and overview. In Internet of Things for Sustainable Community Development; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
- Obaideen, K.; Yousef, B.A.; AlMallahi, M.N.; Tan, Y.C.; Mahmoud, M.; Jaber, H.; Ramadan, M. An overview of smart irrigation systems using IoT. Energy Nexus 2022, 7, 100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obaideen, K.; AlMallahi, M.N.; Alami, A.H.; Ramadan, M.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Shehata, N.; Olabi, A. On the contribution of solar energy to sustainable developments goals: Case study on Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park. Int. J. 2021, 12, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeyeye, K.; Ijumba, N.; Colton, J. Exploring the environmental and economic impacts of wind energy: A cost-benefit perspective. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2020, 27, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alnaqbi, S.A.; Alasad, S.; Aljaghoub, H.; Alami, A.H.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Olabi, A.G. Applicability of Hydropower Generation and Pumped Hydro Energy Storage in the Middle East and North Africa. Energies 2022, 15, 2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, R.; Kularathna, A.; Matsuda, H.; Takagi, K. Information flow to increase support for tidal energy development in remote islands of a developing country: Agent-based simulation of information flow in Flores Timur Regency, Indonesia. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2021, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Radi, M.; Adil Al-Isawi, O.; Abdelghafar, A.A.; Fayez Abu Qiyas, A.; AlMallahi, M.; Khanafer, K.; Assad, M.E.H. Recent progress, economic potential, and environmental benefits of mineral recovery geothermal brine treatment systems. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Destek, M.A.; Sarkodie, S.A.; Asamoah, E.F. Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 149, 106076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelkareem, M.A.; Soudan, B.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Sayed, E.T.; AlMallahi, M.N.; Inayat, A.; Al Radi, M.; Olabi, A.G. Progress of artificial neural networks applications in hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 182, 66–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obaideen, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Olabi, A.G. Biogas role in achievement of the sustainable development goals: Evaluation, Challenges, and Guidelines. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022, 131, 104207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olabi, A.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Salameh, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Husain, K.S.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Selection guidelines for wind energy technologies. Energies 2021, 14, 3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barra, P.; de Carvalho, W.; Menezes, T.; Fernandes, R.; Coury, D. A review on wind power smoothing using high-power energy storage systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadorsky, P. Wind energy for sustainable development: Driving factors and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.T.; Smith, A.D. fEvaluation of renewable energy technologies and their potential for technical integration and cost-effective use within the US energy sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1372–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, E.T.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Rabaia, M.K.H.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Chae, K.-J.; Olabi, A.G. A critical review on environmental impacts of renewable energy systems and mitigation strategies: Wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 144505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelkhalig, A.; Elgendi, M.; Selim, M.Y. Review on validation techniques of blade element momentum method implemented in wind turbines. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2022; Available online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1074/1/012008/meta (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Cheng, S.; Elgendi, M.; Lu, F.; Chamorro, L.P. On the Wind Turbine Wake and Forest Terrain Interaction. Energies 2021, 14, 7204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragheb, M. History of harnessing wind power. In Wind Energy Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 127–143. [Google Scholar]
- Pain, S. Power through the ages. Nature 2017, 551, S134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Staffell, I.; Pfenninger, S. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 2016, 114, 1224–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El Ramahi, M. Case study: Masdar renewable energy water desalination program. In The Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus in the Arab Region; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 209–221. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Collazo, C.; Greaves, D.; Iglesias, G. A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gasch, R.; Twele, J. Wind Power Plants: Fundamentals, Design, Construction and Operation; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, Q.; He, X.; Lu, Z.; Streiter, R.; Otto, T. A comprehensive review of miniatured wind energy harvesters. Nano Mater. Sci. 2021, 3, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghenai, C.; Rasheed, M.A.; Alshamsi, M.J.; Alkamali, M.A.; Ahmad, F.F.; Inayat, A. Design of hybrid solar photovoltaics/shrouded wind turbine power system for thermal pyrolysis of plastic waste. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2020, 22, 100773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomaa, M.R.; Rezk, H.; Mustafa, R.J.; Al-Dhaifallah, M. Evaluating the environmental impacts and energy performance of a wind farm system utilizing the life-cycle assessment method: A practical case study. Energies 2019, 12, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Agency, E.P. Renewable Energy Fact Sheet: Wind Turbines. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/documents/wind_turbines_fact_sheet_p100il8k.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Mendecka, B.; Lombardi, L. Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: A review of simplified models and harmonization of the results. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 111, 462–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, M.S.; Mahdi, A.J.; Bilal, M.; Sohail, H.M.; Ali, N.; Iqbal, H.M. Environmental impact and pollution-related challenges of renewable wind energy paradigm–a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 683, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schippers, P.; Buij, R.; Schotman, A.; Verboom, J.; van der Jeugd, H.; Jongejans, E. Mortality limits used in wind energy impact assessment underestimate impacts of wind farms on bird populations. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 6274–6287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lucena, J.d.A.Y.; Lucena, K.Â.A. Wind energy in Brazil: An overview and perspectives under the triple bottom line. Clean Energy 2019, 3, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Majid, M. Wind energy programme in India: Emerging energy alternatives for sustainable growth. Energy Environ. 2019, 30, 1135. [Google Scholar]
- Marques, A.T.; Batalha, H.; Rodrigues, S.; Costa, H.; Pereira, M.J.R.; Fonseca, C.; Mascarenhas, M.; Bernardino, J. Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: An updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 179, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smeraldo, S.; Bosso, L.; Fraissinet, M.; Bordignon, L.; Brunelli, M.; Ancillotto, L.; Russo, D. Modelling risks posed by wind turbines and power lines to soaring birds: The black stork (Ciconia nigra) in Italy as a case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 1959–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnett, E.B.; Baerwald, E.F.; Mathews, F.; Rodrigues, L.; Rodríguez-Durán, A.; Rydell, J.; Villegas-Patraca, R.; Voigt, C.C. Impacts of wind energy development on bats: A global perspective. In Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 295–323. [Google Scholar]
- Nazir, M.S.; Bilal, M.; Sohail, H.M.; Liu, B.; Chen, W.; Iqbal, H.M. Impacts of renewable energy atlas: Reaping the benefits of renewables and biodiversity threats. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 22113–22124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellabban, O.; Abu-Rub, H.; Blaabjerg, F. Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 748–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, K.; Bergot, A.; Liang, C.; Xiang, W.-N.; Huang, Z. Environmental issues associated with wind energy–A review. Renew. Energy 2015, 75, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laranjeiro, T.; May, R.; Verones, F. Impacts of onshore wind energy production on birds and bats: Recommendations for future life cycle impact assessment developments. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 2007–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nazir, M.S.; Ali, N.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M. Potential environmental impacts of wind energy development: A global perspective. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2020, 13, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.L.; Singh, P.K. Global environmental problems. In Principles and Applications of Environmental Biotechnology for a Sustainable Future; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 13–41. [Google Scholar]
- Olabi, A.G.; Obaideen, K.; Elsaid, K.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennis, B. Climate and Environment (The U.S. Wind Industry Now Employs More than 100,000 People). In The Washington Post; 2017; Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/04/19/the-u-s-wind-industry-now-employs-more-than-100000-people/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Enevoldsen, P.; Sovacool, B.K. Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: Practical guidelines for onshore wind project development in France. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durakovic, F. Levelized Cost of Electricity of Renewable Energy Technologies as a Criterion for Project Prioritization. 2021. Available online: https://lutpub.lut.fi/handle/10024/163284 (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Armin Razmjoo, A.; Sumper, A.; Davarpanah, A. Energy sustainability analysis based on SDGs for developing countries. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 42, 1041–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard-Grenville, J.; Davis, G.F.; Dyllick, T.; Miller, C.C.; Thau, S.; Tsui, A.S. Sustainable development for a better world: Contributions of leadership, management, and organizations. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2019, 5, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatimah, Y.A.; Govindan, K.; Murniningsih, R.; Setiawan, A. Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, M.; Ghazali, F.; Yuniza, M.E. Governance interventions in providing affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy in the ASEAN region (Goal 7). In Good Governance and the Sustainable Development Goals in Southeast Asia; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2022; Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003230724-8/governance-interventions-providing-affordable-reliable-sustainable-modern-energy-asean-region-goal-7-maizatun-mustafa-farahdilah-ghazali-mailinda-eka-yuniza (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- McCollum, D.; Gomez Echeverri, L.; Riahi, K.; Parkinson, S. Sdg7: Ensure Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy for All. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/goal-7-ensure-access-affordable-reliable-sustainable-and-modern-energy-all (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Streimikiene, D. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for the assessment of renewable energy technologies in a household: A review. Energies 2020, 13, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carley, M.; Spapens, P. Sharing the World: Sustainable Living and Global Equity in the 21st Century; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315087993/sharing-world-phillipe-spapens-michael-carley (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Van Vuuren, D.P.; Stehfest, E.; Gernaat, D.E.; Doelman, J.C.; Van den Berg, M.; Harmsen, M.; de Boer, H.S.; Bouwman, L.F.; Daioglou, V.; Edelenbosch, O.Y. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 42, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alharthi, M.; Hanif, I.; Alamoudi, H. Impact of environmental pollution on human health and financial status of households in MENA countries: Future of using renewable energy to eliminate the environmental pollution. Renew. Energy 2022, 190, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albright, R.; Cooley, S. A review of interventions proposed to abate impacts of ocean acidification on coral reefs. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2019, 29, 100612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veers, P.; Dykes, K.; Lantz, E.; Barth, S.; Bottasso, C.L.; Carlson, O.; Clifton, A.; Green, J.; Green, P.; Holttinen, H. Grand challenges in the science of wind energy. Science 2019, 366, eaau2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shahsavari, A.; Akbari, M. Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Alalmi, A.H.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Wind turbine concepts for domestic wind power generation at low wind quality sites. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 394, 136137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, A.; Farrok, O.; Haque, M.M. Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Huang, X.; Song, N.; Ma, Y.; Wei, D. Evaluation of the Spatial Suitability of Offshore Wind Farm—A Case Study of the Sea Area of Liaoning Province. Sustainability 2022, 14, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giebel, G.; Hasager, C.B. An overview of offshore wind farm design. MARE-WINT 2016, 337–346. [Google Scholar]
- Löhning, T.; Voßbeck, M.; Kelm, M. Analysis of grouted connections for offshore wind turbines. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Energy 2013, 166, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleem, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Cui, L.; Amani, S.; Salem, A.R.; Jalbi, S. Load utilisation (LU) ratio of monopiles supporting offshore wind turbines: Formulation and examples from European Wind Farms. Ocean. Eng. 2022, 248, 110798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verfuss, U.K.; Sparling, C.E.; Arnot, C.; Judd, A.; Coyle, M. Review of offshore wind farm impact monitoring and mitigation with regard to marine mammals. Eff. Noise Aquat. Life II 2016, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar]
- Lamb, J.S.; Newstead, D.J.; Koczur, L.M.; Ballard, B.M.; Green, M.C.; Jodice, P.G. A bridge between oceans: Overland migration of marine birds in a wind energy corridor. J. Avian Biol. 2018, 49, jav-01474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbert-Acero, J.F.; Probst, O.; Réthoré, P.-E.; Larsen, G.C.; Castillo-Villar, K.K. A review of methodological approaches for the design and optimization of wind farms. Energies 2014, 7, 6930–7016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehata, N.; Obaideen, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Mahmoud, M.S.; El-Salamony, A.-H.R.; Mahmoud, H.M.; Olabi, A. Role of Refuse-derived fuel in circular economy and sustainable development goals. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 163, 558–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordova, M.F.; Celone, A. SDGs and innovation in the business context literature review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blinova, E.; Ponomarenko, T.; Knysh, V. Analyzing the Concept of Corporate Sustainability in the Context of Sustainable Business Development in the Mining Sector with Elements of Circular Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinderks, A.; Schrepp, M.; Mayo, F.J.D.; Escalona, M.J.; Thomaschewski, J. Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2019, 65, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velimirović, D.; Velimirović, M.; Stanković, R. Role and importance of key performance indicators measurement. Serb. J. Manag. 2011, 6, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElAlfy, A.; Palaschuk, N.; El-Bassiouny, D.; Wilson, J.; Weber, O. Scoping the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research in the sustainable development goals (SDGs) era. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hristov, I.; Chirico, A. The role of sustainability key performance indicators (KPIs) in implementing sustainable strategies. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bae, H.; Smardon, R.S. Indicators of sustainable business practices. Environ. Manag. Pract. 2011, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szennay, Á.; Szigeti, C.; Kovács, N.; Szabó, D.R. Through the blurry looking glass—SDGs in the GRI reports. Resources 2019, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dumay, J.; Guthrie, J.; Farneti, F. GRI sustainability reporting guidelines for public and third sector organizations: A critical review. Public Manag. Rev. 2010, 12, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Source | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|---|
Solar |
|
| |
Wind |
|
| |
Geothermal |
|
| |
Biomass |
|
| |
Tidal |
|
| |
Hydropower |
|
|
SDG | Wind Farms’ Contribution to the SDGs |
---|---|
SDG 1: No poverty |
|
SDG 3: Good health and wellbeing |
|
SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation |
|
SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy |
|
SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth |
|
SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure |
|
SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities |
|
SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production |
|
SDG 13: Climate action |
|
SDG 14: Life below water |
|
SDG 15: Life on land |
|
SDG 1: No poverty
|
SDG 2: Zero hunger
|
SDG 3: Good health and well-being
|
SDG 4: Quality education
|
SDG 5: Gender equality
|
SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation
|
SDG 7 Affordable and clean energy
|
SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
|
SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure
|
SDG 10: Reduced inequalities
|
SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities
|
SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production
|
SDG 13: Climate action
|
SDG 14: Life below water
|
SDG 15: Life on land
|
SDG 16: Peace, justice, and strong institution
|
SDG 17: Partnerships for the goals
|
SDG 3: Good health and wellbeing
|
SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation
|
SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy
|
SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
|
SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure
|
SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities
|
SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production
|
SDG 13: Climate action
|
SDG 14: Life below water
|
SDG 15: Life on land
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Olabi, A.G.; Obaideen, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; AlMallahi, M.N.; Shehata, N.; Alami, A.H.; Mdallal, A.; Hassan, A.A.M.; Sayed, E.T. Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054641
Olabi AG, Obaideen K, Abdelkareem MA, AlMallahi MN, Shehata N, Alami AH, Mdallal A, Hassan AAM, Sayed ET. Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054641
Chicago/Turabian StyleOlabi, A. G., Khaled Obaideen, Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, Maryam Nooman AlMallahi, Nabila Shehata, Abdul Hai Alami, Ayman Mdallal, Asma Ali Murah Hassan, and Enas Taha Sayed. 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054641
APA StyleOlabi, A. G., Obaideen, K., Abdelkareem, M. A., AlMallahi, M. N., Shehata, N., Alami, A. H., Mdallal, A., Hassan, A. A. M., & Sayed, E. T. (2023). Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array. Sustainability, 15(5), 4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054641