Next Article in Journal
Assessing Supply Chain Innovations for Building Resilient Food Supply Chains: An Emerging Economy Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Case Study Analysis on Agri-Food Value Chain: A Guideline-Based Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Using Landfill Sites and Marginal Lands for Socio-Economically Sustainable Biomass Production through Cultivation of Non-Food Energy Crops: An Analysis Focused on South Asia and Europe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hesitations and Aspirations of Farmers in Nature-Protected Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Underutilized Vegetable Crops in the Mediterranean Region: A Literature Review of Their Requirements and the Ecosystem Services Provided

by
Dimitrios P. Platis
1,
Eleni Papoui
2,
Filippos Bantis
2,
Andreas Katsiotis
3,
Athanasios Koukounaras
2,
Andreas P. Mamolos
1,* and
Konstadinos Mattas
4
1
Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Protection, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Laboratory of Vegetable Crops, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management, Cyprus University of Technology, 50329 Limassol, Cyprus
4
Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 4921; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064921
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability via Biodiverse Agri-Food Value Chains)

Abstract

:
By 2050, the increasing demand for food will put additional pressure on natural resources. Underutilized crops, such as wild vegetables, are an essential component of the Mediterranean diet and are widely correlated with the traditional cuisine of Mediterranean countries. They could be widely associated with resistance to abiotic stress and enhanced genetic diversity, and could provide various ecosystem services. Their cultivation could support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) established by the UN and the current EU policies related to environmentally friendly agriculture. Based on an extensive literature review, the aim of this paper is to summarize the environmental and ecological requirements of specific Mediterranean underutilized vegetables, the provisioning and regulating ecosystem services that could be derived from their cultivation, and their potential use. It is concluded that thorough planning of underutilized crop cultivation could enhance the provisioning and regulating ecosystem services that positively affect Mediterranean agriculture. However, further research should be carried out regarding their environmental and economic impact in order to assess the environmental and socio-economic effects of underutilized crops cultivation. This could lead to designing future policies that support underutilized crop cultivation and consumption.

1. Introduction

According to FAO [1], the need for intensive food production from the agricultural sector will require more resources to meet the needs of the growing world population by 2050. At the same time, targets have been set for more resilient agroecosystems that sustainably provide food and nutrients [1]. Agroecosystems are often considered as sources of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services (Table 1). These may include the provision of food or biomass for energy, bioremediation through the root system, erosion and pest control, and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation [2,3]. The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), developed from the environmental accounting work undertaken by the European Environment Agency, is the main framework that encodes the major ecosystem services (Table 1).
In 2016, the Member States of the UN adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), integrating social, economic, and environmental dimensions in achieving sustainability (Table 2). The SDGs include 17 goals, 169 targets, and 200 benchmarks for achieving its sustainability goals, with a time horizon of 2030. A set of SDGs and targets are directly linked to sustainable agricultural production. The SDGs recognize the critical role of sustainable ecosystem management [4]. Although ecosystem services are not explicitly mentioned in the SDGs, it is crucial to highlight and strengthen them to make optimal management decisions in agricultural production [4,5,6]. This policy is also outlined in European Union policies such as the Farm to Fork Strategy New Green Deal. However, further research should be carried out to translate national and international objectives into local policies that demonstrate the interaction between agricultural production and how ecological and socio-economic systems are affected by climate change, especially in vulnerable regions.
The Mediterranean basin is a crucial plant biodiversity hotspot, containing 22,500 plant species of which 11,700 are endemic (about 10% of the world’s total plant species) [7]. Moreover, the Mediterranean region is a climate change hotspot, with a further increase in the average temperature (of 0.9–5.6 °C compared to the last two decades of the 20th century, depending on greenhouse gas emission scenarios) and a decrease in annual precipitation (by 4–22%, depending on greenhouse gas emission scenarios), leading to vulnerabilities and variability in the region’s agri-food sector [8,9]. It is worth mentioning that the current food supply chain (production, transport, processing, manufacturing, packaging, storage, retail, consumption, losses, and waste) could be responsible for 21–37% of the total annual greenhouse gas emissions [10].
Agricultural production across the Mediterranean region mainly consists of small-scale cultivations. Local food products compose the core of the Mediterranean diet. At the same time, the agroecosystems of the region provide other ecosystem services such as carbon storage, pollination, habitat provisioning, the promotion of cultural heritage, and agro-tourism [11]. However, intensive agricultural practices that aim to maximize food supply could cause pressure on agroecosystems, affecting the ecosystem services provided, such as biodiversity and soil carbon sequestration [3].
Agricultural products, a vital component of a healthy diet, are also vulnerable to climate change. Many practices can be optimized to promote adaptation across the agri-food sector. Options on the food supply side include diversifying crops and selecting plant species with greater tolerance to changing climate conditions [10]. Demand-side adaptation includes practices such as adopting sustainable dietary patterns [10]. Food preference has short- and long-term effects on human health and longevity as well as on the public health system [12]. Among the diet plans worldwide, the Mediterranean diet has been well-recognized as a healthy diet that promotes well-being and longevity [13,14,15].
Underutilized crops such as wild vegetables are an essential ingredient of the Mediterranean diet and are highly correlated with the traditional cuisine of Mediterranean countries [16,17]. Recently, studies have been conducted that provide useful information about the valuable phytochemicals concentrations in underutilized vegetables of the Mediterranean region [18,19]. Consequently, the enhancement of their cultivation could substitute other major vegetables without affecting nutrient and phytochemical supplies through the agri-food sector. Endemic underutilized vegetables could be more resistant to abiotic and biotic stresses such as drought, high temperatures, pests, and diseases while remaining productive [20]. Underutilized vegetables could enhance genetic diversity, which is a critical supporting ecosystem service [21]. In total, they could potentially enhance a country’s food security, its available nutritional quality, and the stability of its agricultural income [22]. However, there are several socio-economic, environmental, and policy challenges arising from underutilized vegetable crops cultivation (Table 2).
The aim of this paper is to summarize the provisioning and regulating ecosystem services that could be derived from the use of underutilized vegetables (Amaranthus blitum L., Crithmum maritimum L., Lactuca serriola L., Pastinaca sativa L., Plantago lanceolata L., Portulaca oleracea L., Reichardia picroides L., Scolymus hispanicus L., Sonchus oleraceus L., Sylibum marianum L., Urtica dioica L.) across the Mediterranean Region. We conducted a literature review in order to (i) determine the cultivation practices and inputs of the underutilized crop production, (ii) overview the major environmental, nutritional, and livelihood benefits derived, (iii) express those benefits as provisional and regulating ecosystem services interlinked with major SDGs established by UN, and (iv) discuss several risks and issues that must be considered regarding the benefits that underutilized vegetable production could provide.
The above-mentioned vegetable crops were selected based on their widespread distribution and prevalence throughout the Mediterranean region. Although some of these crops are commonly categorized as weeds, they have been recognized for their crucial nutritional value and their use as food sources in the region. Additionally, many of these species possess unique and endemic characteristics that contribute to the cultural identity of the Mediterranean region. The selection of these crops allowed for a comprehensive review of the diverse array of underutilized vegetable crops in the region, highlighting the importance of both cultivated and wild plants. Overall, the selected crops could provide insights into the nutritional and environmental aspects of underutilized vegetable crops in the Mediterranean region.
In preparing this review of the literature we consulted the SCOPUS database to search for peer-reviewed articles. Regarding the environmental requirements, the exact scientific names of the studied underutilized crops were included. In addition, the terms included the exact studied parameter, such as “Fertilizer”, “Climate”, and “Soil”.
Regarding the ecosystem services provided, the exact scientific names of the studied underutilized crops were included. Moreover, the terms “Ecosystem Service”, “Provisioning Service”, and “Regulating Service” were substituted with the examples of the ecosystem services provided such as “Food”, “Raw material”, “Medicinal”, “Soil erosion”, “Carbon sequestration”, “Remediation”, and “Biological control”.

2. Ecology, Environmental Requirements, and Ecosystem Services of the Underutilized Crops

Underutilized leafy greens, which have a high nutritional value, can now be incorporated into existing cultivations to contribute to more nutritious food for the consumer while at the same time making alternatives available to producers and the market as well as enriching biodiversity. Table 3 summarizes the ecological and environmental requirements of the studied underutilized crops based on the literature reviewed. All species mentioned in Table 3 are known as wild weeds growing in unfavorable, biotic, or abiotic environmental conditions such as salinity, drought, and poor soil conditions. These species have been studied to determine their nutritional value and use in the pharmaceutical industry. They have been found to contain high amounts of antioxidant compounds, act against cancer genesis, be anti-inflammatory, and induce the immune system.
However, as presented in the table above, there is a lack of information about the agronomic characteristics of these underutilized species. Therefore, more research must be conducted to gain more knowledge about these species’ cultivation needs to benefit from their nutritional and medicinal value and their ability to grow in unbeneficial conditions. Table 4 presents the major edible parts, specific nutritional value, pharmaceutical use, and other potential uses of the studied underutilized crops. Table 5 summarizes the provisioning and regulating ecosystem services provided by the studied underutilized crops, as described in the subsections below (see also Figure 1).

2.1. Amaranthus blitum L.

Amaranthus blitum, an annual crop, is native to the Mediterranean region; it is a major weed in crops because it easily multiplies. It is difficult to be eliminated from cultivation due to the germination of its seed even after ten years. Amaranthus blitum is a source of phenolics, minerals, flavonoids, and vitamins. It has a high concentration of protein, and the tender tops are harvested from early summer to autumn. Regarding the provided ecosystem services, Amaranthus blitum is well-adapted and resilient to abiotic stress, such as drought, high salinity, and heavy metal concentration [23]. In addition, recent research has shown that drought and salinity stress increases the concentration of nutrients and bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids and antioxidants [24]. Its leaves can be eaten boiled with vinegar or lemon and combined with various vegetable products such as pumpkin seeds. Furthermore, it is used in pies with other leafy greens [25,26,27].

2.2. Crithmum maritinum L.

Crithmum maritinum is a flowering Apiaceae plant, and it is native to Europe. Crithmum maritinum is known for its property to adapt to saline and silty-clay soils. It is resistant to soil salinity and highly saline water, which allows it to be cultivated in saline environments [28]. Its stem, leaves, and seed pods can be consumed as pickles in hot, salted, or spiced vinegar or in fresh salads. Crithmum maritinum is a plant rich in carbohydrates and antioxidants [29,30,31] and it has diuretic properties. Its leaves have high concentrations of vitamin C, carotenoids, and flavonoids [32]. It could accumulate secondary metabolites, absorb toxic ions [33], and reduce soil erosion [34]. Crithmum maritimum bioactive substances could be used for aromatic and insecticide purposes [35].
Table 3. Environmental requirements of the studied underutilized crops.
Table 3. Environmental requirements of the studied underutilized crops.
Amaranthus blitumCrithmum maritimumLactuca serriolaReichardia pircoidesPastinaca sativaPlantago lanceolataPortulaca oleraceaScolymus hispanicusSonchus
oleraceus
Sylbum marianumUrtica dioica
N1025 kg ha−1--100 kg ha−160 kg ha−1140 mg l−1--49.5 kg ha−160–80 kg ha−1
P10---44 kg ha−140 kg ha−150 mg l−1--138 kg ha−140–50 kg ha−1
K20---166 kg ha−180 kg ha−1200 mg l−1--150 kg ha−1150–180 kg ha−1
SoilSaline tolerantSilty-clay--Heavy, loamy, humic, non-crusting-Saline tolerant-Rochy to nutritive soilSandy to heavy clayLoose soil
Water500 mm210 mm--Needs wet habitats-Drought tolerant-Drought tolerant180 mmMoist soil not flooding
Temp °C15–252.9–20.715–25Summer crops-Fall or spring20–3522–35Winter crop, heat tolerant15Winter crop
pH>66.44.5–7>4-6.5–7.35.5–6--5.5–7.6
Organic Matter20–40 t ha−1----Manure 20,000–35,000 kg ha−1, 2–4 times--Thrives when fertilized-Required
Salinity--<80 mMMedium tolerance---Medium toleranceHigh tolerance15 dS/m-
References[25][34][36][37,38,39][40][39,41][42][43][44][45][46]
Table 4. Major edible parts, specific nutritional value, pharmaceutical use and other potential uses of the studied underutilized crops.
Table 4. Major edible parts, specific nutritional value, pharmaceutical use and other potential uses of the studied underutilized crops.
Edible PartNutritional ValuePharmaceutical UseOther Uses
Lactuca serriolaLeaves, young shootsPolyphenolic compoundsDiuretic, digestiveOil for paints and soap
Urtica dioicaLeavesCarotenoids, vitamins C and E, proteinsAntimicrobial, antiulcer, analgesicInsect repellent, fibre, dyes
Reichardia pircoidesLeaves, root Depurative, diuretic, hypoglycemic-
Plantago lanceolataLeaves, seedsIridoid glycosides, flavonoids, phenylethanoid glycosidesAnti-inflammatoryLeaves as fibres for textile
Crithmum maritimumLeavesVitamin C, carotenoids, flavonoidsDiureticOil for perfumes and insecticides
Portulaca oleraceaFlowers, leaves, stalks, seedsVitamin C, ω-3 fats--
Amaranthus blitumLeavesPhenolics, minerals, flavonoids, vitamins, proteins-Dyes from the whole plant
Pastinaca sativaRoot, leaves, shootsVitamins, minerals, potassiumAntioxidant, anti-inflammatoryInsecticide
Sylibum marianumFlowers, leaves, stalks, roots Hypolipidemic, anti-atherosclerosis-
Scolymus hispanicusLeaves, rootsAntioxidant and phenolic compoundsAntibacterial-
Sonchus oleraceusLeaves, root, stemCarotenoids, minerals (Fe), vitamin ECholesterol, high blood pressureLeaves for gum and latex
Table 5. Specific provisioning and regulating ecosystem services related to underutilized crop.
Table 5. Specific provisioning and regulating ecosystem services related to underutilized crop.
ClassAmaranthus blitumCrithmum
maritimum
Lactuca
serriola
Pastinaca sativaPlantago
lanceolata
Portulaca oleraceaeReichardia picroidesScolymus
hispanicus
Sonchus oleraceusSylibum
marianum
Urtica dioica
ProvisioningCultivated plants for nutritional purposes+++++++++++
Materials from cultivated plants+++++ + +
Wild plants used for nutrition+++++++++++
Materials from wild plants+++++ + +
Plant materials collected for maintaining or establishing a population+++++++++++
RegulatingBio-remediation ++ +++++++
Erosion control + + + +
Pest control+++++++++++
Disease control+++++++++++
Regulation of greenhouse gas emissions+++++++++++

2.3. Lactuca serriola L.

Lactuca serriola is a biennial plant that can reach 1 m in height. It has a thick central stem with thorns. It has established populations on all continents and has the most widespread distribution compared to other Lactuca species. It can be grown under cover (glasshouse) under controlled conditions of 32/25 °C day/night and 14 h of light with supplementary lighting. Lactuca serriola contains polyphenolic compounds, and its shoots contain milky juice, which is a tranquilizer. Its tender leaves can be eaten boiled or raw, but can be also used as raw material for rubber production [47,48,49]. The whole plant is rich in a milky sap that is used in medicine for its diuretic and digestive properties. Lactuca serriola plants could be cultivated for the phytoremediation of heavy metals [50]. Moreover, they present high adaptability to abiotic stress, such as high temperatures and limited available water, mainly due to its root system that provides better management of available soil water [51]. Consequently, it could maintain high water-use efficiency under severe drought conditions [52] Lactuca serriola cultivation could reduce water loss and consequently soil erosion [53]. Βased on the above, a set of ecosystem services are provided, such as provision of material, food, and erosion control.

2.4. Pastinaca sativa L.

Pastinaca sativa is a root vegetable closely related to carrot and parsley. It is a biennial plant usually grown as an annual plant. It originates from Eurasia, and is characterized as a grassland plant. Its seeds are usually planted in early spring and the harvest begins in late fall after the first frost and continues through winter. Regarding ecosystem services, Pastinaca sativa is rich in vitamins and minerals and contains high amounts of potassium. It has been found to contain some vitamins of B complex. It is used in medicine as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory, but it is also effective against cancer and cardiovascular diseases. It can also be consumed baked or boiled, roasted, fried, grilled, or steamed [54].

2.5. Plantago lanceolata L.

Plantago lanceolata is a common grassland and roadside plant native to the Mediterranean region. It can be grown in a greenhouse during summer with the higher nutritional quality found in the young and juvenile stages. It also provides a set of ecosystem services, such as provision of material and food and bioremediation. The leaves of Plantago lanceolata contain a notable amount of phenolics and antioxidant compounds that perform as anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic. Iridoid glycosides, flavonoids, and phenylethanoid glycosides are also included in the chemical compounds contained in Plantago lanceolata. Its leaves are used in many countries to treat colds and mouth and throat inflammations. They can also be eaten in cooked dishes and mixed salads. Plantago lanceolata demonstrates superior bio-potential and its use as a traditional remedy and functional food is validated [55,56]. Plantago lanceolata is suitable in temperate and subtropical climates [57]. Although its cultivation is enhanced by rainfall, its deep root system allows it to exhibit drought tolerance [58]. Moreover, its rhizosphere microorganisms could accumulate Cu from soils [59].

2.6. Portulaca oleracieae L.

Portulaca oleracea is an annual plant native to Southern Europe. As a spring-to-summer crop, it is tolerant to drought and salinity. Its tender tops are harvested from the beginning of summer until autumn. Portulaca oleracea is linked with numerous ecosystem services. It has a high vitamin C content and is the plant with the most ω-3 fats. It can be eaten raw in a salad with olive oil and onions and replace lettuce as a green vegetable [27,31,42,60]. Portulaca oleracea shows tolerance to high light intensity, temperatures, humidity, and soil salinity [61,62]. In particular, its photosynthetic activity increases under warm conditions and during intensive solar radiation and is resistant to drought stress [63]. It can be easily cultivated in a range of climatic conditions where other plants of similar nutritional value generally do not grow [64]. Portulaca oleracea could be cultivated in order to accumulate heavy metals, such as Zn, Cd, and Pb, from contaminated soils [65,66]. It can also be used to absorb NaCl from soils and gradually to decrease soil erosion [67].

2.7. Scolymus hispanicus L.

Scolymus hispanicus is a summer biennial or perennial plant and can reach a height of 1 m. It has a deep, thick root; a central stem; and spiny leaves. It is native to southern Europe and could be found everywhere throughout Greece in uncultivated areas of low altitude. The new tender leaves are harvested before they become spiny, and the tender shoots are gathered from winter to spring. The root and fleshy leaf ridges are gathered in autumn. Regarding the ecosystem services provided, Scolymus hispanicus is considered a source of antioxidant and phenolic compounds. It is used in medicine due to its antibacterial and anticancer properties. The new leaves and shoots can be eaten boiled alone or with other greens. The roots and stems are also edible in soups or cooked with meat. They can also be boiled and pickled with vinegar and oil [43]. In cultivation, the plant could be used to absorb soil Cd [68] and remove dyes from wastewater [69].

2.8. Reichardia picroides L.

Reichardia picroides is a herbaceous perennial plant growing from a taproot. It forms a basal rosette of leaves with flowering stems that can grow up to 45 cm tall. It is native to the Mediterranean basin and western Asia. Regarding the ecosystem services provided, Reichardia picroides is a pH- and salinity-adapting plant. Its leaves are depurative, diuretic, and hypoglycemic. Its roots are used to treat coughs, abdominal pains, and kidney problems. The leaves of Reichardia pircoides can be eaten raw or cooked [70]. Reichardia picroides is highly resistant to cultivation in saline- and nutrient-poor soils [37,70,71]. It can also be cultivated in order to accumulate NaCl for their phytoremediation properties [72].

2.9. Sonchus oleraceus L.

Sonchus oleraceus is an annual crop that reaches 40–80 cm tall and is native to Europe and Western Asia. Its leaves are harvested from early autumn until the end of spring, have a light green color, and contain milky sap. Sonchus oleraceus is known to reduce serum cholesterol levels and act against high blood pressure. It also has high concentrations of minerals (Fe), vitamin E, and carotenoids [73]. The leaves of Sonchus oleraceus taste a little sweet and are often eaten boiled or used in herb pies along with other greens and herbs [44]. Sonchus oleraceus plants are resilient to warm climates with intensely dry summers [74]. Although they could be very productive when cultivated in nutrient-rich soils, they can also be grown in disturbed and rocky soils [75]. Moreover, the Sonchus plant presents high salinity tolerance [76]. Lastly, its rhizosphere could absorb NaCl [72] and heavy metals (Zn, Cd) from soils [77]. Consequently, Sonchus oleraceus is linked with ecosystem services such as the provision of material and food, erosion control, bioremediation, and lower inputs that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

2.10. Sylibum marianum L.

Sylibum marianum can reach 30 to 200 cm (12 to 79 in) in height and has an overall conical shape. It is native to the Mediterranean basin and grows in various soil types, from sandy soils to much heavier clay soils. It is typically sown directly into the soil during the autumn or spring, with row spacing between 40–75 cm and a distance of 20–30 cm between individual plants. The nutrient requirements for Sylibum marianum are low to moderate, thereby reducing its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions since it can adjust to disturbed soils and various climate conditions. Extracts of milk thistle have been used as medical remedies since the era of ancient Greece. As a cultivated plant, it is linked with provisioning ecosystem services. It is used as a cardiovascular protector; for its hypolipidemic and anti-atherosclerosis activities; and for the prevention of insulin resistance, cancer, and Alzheimer’s. It is also used as a food remedy [31,45,78,79]. Sylibum marianum is easier to grow in areas with intense sunlight and is more productive in warm climates and dry summers [80]. Its cultivation could be used for PCBs’ bioremediation from contaminated soils [81].

2.11. Urtica dioica L.

Urtica dioica is native to Europe. It is a biennial spiny plant, whose leaves are distinguished by white lines. It is mainly found near grasslands, where it thrives. It is a winter crop that can tolerate temperatures as low as −15 °C. Harvest of its new fresh leaves occurs from autumn until spring and before flowering. Regarding the ecosystem services provided, the nutritional value of Urtica dioica is important since it is a source of carotenoids, vitamins, and proteins. Furthermore, the water extract of this plant has antioxidant activity. Because of this content of antioxidants, it is widely used in cosmetics and medicine. The fresh leaves of Urtica dioica can also be boiled or sautéed just like spinach. Urtica dioica is used, among other herbs, to make delicious nettle pies in Greece. Urtica dioica offers antimicrobial, antiulcer, and analgesic activity and could also treat various diseases such as diabetes and inflammation. Moreover, its cultivation could be used for phytoremediation of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As, Ni, and Cr) [82,83]. Urtica dioica cultivation is nitrophilous and potentially could reduce the erosion of over-fertilized soils [84]. Regarding other uses of Urtica dioica cultivation, it has a long history as a textile fiber [85,86].

3. Considerations to Be Addressed

In the previous section, the main requirements for the cultivation of the underutilized crops under study were presented. Thereafter, their cultivation was linked to the possible provisioning and regulating ecosystem services of CICES V5.1., the SDGs, and the current environmentally friendly policies of the European Union. Nevertheless, the non-evidence-based selection of cultivation practices or its introduction in some areas may lead to reverse effects, i.e., ecosystem disservices, a possible reduction of producers’ income, and a degradation of the final product offered.
In particular, there should be an evidence-based outcome in order to build an inventory of best farming practices that would fill the gaps in the ecological and/or environmental requirements of underutilized crop cultivation. In addition, since all the studied underutilized crops are considered to be weeds, the possibility of developing competition with neighboring crops leading to a reduction in yields should be taken into account. Respectively, the development of allelopathy with specific crops, as well as phenomena of autotoxicity under specific climate conditions, should be examined on an individual case basis. Lastly, it is crucial to investigate the role of microclimate and the specific geographical conditions, such as temperature, salinity, altitude, and humidity, in relation to the potential of any underutilized vegetable cultivation [87]. Underutilized crops could potentially provide crucial ecosystem services, such as greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, improvement of soil structure and fertility, and biodiversity stability. However, it is of high importance to identify the sustainable practices in cultivating these underutilized crops. This could include the development of guidelines for sustainable farming practices that prioritize ecological sustainability. Moreover, new capital-intensive applications, such as precision agriculture, should be taken into account, since they could have essential effects on the required inputs.
For the successful development of the cultivation of underutilized crops, several factors must be considered that often go beyond the possible farming practices in the field and the ecological and/or environmental requirements of the crops. In particular, the impact of the development of underutilized crops through the whole life cycle, from the sourcing of the initial inputs (such as machinery and seeds) to the final disposal or reuse of the waste, needs to be studied. This would enhance the study of the actual environmental impact of crops through their life cycle to compare with other crops, as well as their ability to have higher economic returns.
In addition, the cultivation of underutilized crops should be investigated from a value chain perspective. Specifically, what should be examined is the current ability of underutilized crops production to add new value though the whole stages of their products in order to assess their ability to be profitable, have societal benefits, and have a positive or neutral impact on the natural environment. The accessibility of these products to local and national markets should be studied, as well as consumers’ knowledge of the products’ offered properties and/or characteristics. In designing the value and supply chains of underutilized vegetable crops, several considerations should be taken into account in order to maintain profitability. These include the role of small-scale farmers; the quality standards designation; methods of post-harvest handling that reduce potential food loss; and the linkages between producers, traders, and consumers [22,88,89]. According to Will [90], regional markets are a critical factor in maintaining the underutilized vegetable crop products, as well as the role of local authorities in promoting these commodities. Consequently, underutilized crops cultivation could lead to changes in supply chains. For instance, storage facilities may need to be redeveloped and new distribution networks and marketing strategies may need to formed to raise consumer awareness regarding these crops’ consumption.
Underutilized vegetable crops cultivation could potentially enhance food security and biodiversity through crop diversification, reduce the agricultural inputs and nutrient loss, emit lower greenhouse gases, and finally lead to healthier food products. The above-mentioned benefits are directly linked to the EU’s recent policies such as the new CAP 2023-27, the Farm to Fork Strategy, and the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 (Table 6). It is concluded that highlighting all the benefits of developing underutilized crops (ecosystem services, other uses, nutritional value, integration with EU and UN policies, linkages with SDGs, contribution to climate change adaptation) would enhance the future capacity of this sector to increase demand for products as well as strengthen investment for further development (Figure 2).

4. Conclusions

Underutilized crops, since they are endemic species, have a lower need for inputs and are highly resistant to abiotic stress. In addition, they provide a set of ecosystem services that are directly linked to the UN SDGs and EU policies for environmentally friendly agricultural production. However, further evidence-based study of the plant characteristics and their ecological interactions should be carried out. Moreover, the environmental impact and economic potential of underutilized crops both through their products’ life cycle and through their value chain should be examined.
There are several possible pathways for conducting future studies or research to validate mitigation measures on underutilized crops cultivation as a potential for sustainable agriculture in the Mediterranean region. These may involve (i) conducting field trials in order to test their efficiency in various agro-ecological zones, (ii) assessing the potential market demand for these crops (including issues such as supply chain challenges and profitability, (iii) evaluating and promoting their nutritional and health benefits, (iv) studying the impact of underutilized crops on biodiversity, and (v) conducting surveys of farmers, consumers, and stakeholders to investigate the socio-cultural and potential economic aspects of the adoption of underutilized crops.
The above-mentioned pathways could lead to future policies that support underutilized crops cultivation, such as incentives for the adoption of these crops, educational projects supporting their consumption, and guidelines for their sustainable cultivation. The combination of these factors would support the future sustainable development of agricultural production involving these underutilized crops.

Author Contributions

Writing and editing, D.P.P., E.P., F.B., A.K. (Athanasios Koukounaras) and A.P.M.; Review and guidance, A.K. (Andreas Katsiotis) and K.M.; Supervision, A.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EU H2020 BIOVALUE project, grant number 101000499, “Fork-to-farm agent-based simulation tool augmenting BIOdiversity in the agri-food VALUE chain”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the EU H2020 BIOVALUE project, grant number 101000499, “Fork-to-farm agent-based simulation tool augmenting BIOdiversity in the agri-food VALUE chain”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050. Summary Version. 2018. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/CA1553EN/ca1553en.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Power, A.G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 2959–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wood, S.L.; Jones, S.K.; Johnson, J.A.; Brauman, K.A.; Chaplin-Kramer, R.; Fremier, A.; Girvetz, E.; Gordon, L.J.; Kappel, C.V.; Mandle, L.; et al. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1; United Nations: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balzan, M.V.; Sadula, R.; Scalvenzi, L. Assessing ecosystem services supplied by agroecosystems in Mediterranean Europe: A literature review. Land 2020, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. The Mediterranean Basin Hotspot Ecosystem Profile Summary. 2010. Available online: https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/mediterranean_ep_final_2010.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  8. Ali, E.; Cramer, J.W.; Carnicer, E.; Georgopoulou, N.J.M.; Hilmi, G.; Le Cozannet, G.; Lionello, P. Cross-Chapter Paper 4: Mediterranean Region. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pörtner, H.O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., Möller, V., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 2233–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cos, J.; Doblas-Reyes, F.; Jury, M.; Marcos, R.; Bretonnière, P.A.; Samsó, M. The Mediterranean climate change hotspot in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections. Earth Syst. Dynam. 2022, 13, 321–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mbow, C.; Rosenzweig, C.; Barioni, L.G.; Benton, T.G.; Herrero, M.; Krishnapillai, M.; Liwenga, E.; Pradhan, P.; Rivera-Ferre, M.G.; Sapkota, T.; et al. Food Security. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems; Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Calvo Buendia, E., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pörtner, H.O., Roberts, D.C., Zhai, P., Slade, R., Connors, C., van Diemen, R., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. [CrossRef]
  11. Nieto-Romero, M.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; González, J.A.; Martín-López, B. Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2014, 37, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deshpande, S.; Basil, M.D.; Basil, D.Z. Factors Influencing Healthy Eating Habits among College Students: An Application of the Health Belief Model. Health Mark. Q. 2009, 26, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sofi, F.; Macchi, C.; Abbate, R.; Gensini, G.F.; Casini, A. Mediterranean diet and health. Biofactors 2013, 39, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dinu, M.; Pagliai, G.; Casini, A.; Sofi, F. Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bonofiglio, D. Mediterranean Diet and Physical Activity as Healthy Lifestyles for Human Health. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Geraci, A.; Amato, F.; Di Noto, G.; Bazan, G.; Schicchi, R. The wild taxa utilized as vegetables in Sicily (Italy): A traditional component of the Mediterranean diet. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2018, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chatzopoulou, E.; Carocho, M.; Di Gioia, F.; Petropoulos, S.A. The Beneficial Health effects of Vegetables and Wild Edible Greens: The Case of the Mediterranean Diet and Its Sustainability. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cabrera Loera, R.D.; Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Cámara, M.; Díez Marqués, C.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Wild vegetables of the Mediterranean area as valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. García-Herrera, P.; Morales, P.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Tardío, J.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C. Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mediterranean Wild Vegetables after Culinary Treatment. Foods 2020, 9, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borelli, T.; Hunter, D.; Padulosi, S.; Amaya, N.; Meldrum, G.; de Oliveira Beltrame, D.M.; Samarasinghe, G.; Wasike, V.W.; Güner, B.; Tan, A.; et al. Local solutions for sustainable food systems: The contribution of orphan crops and wild edible species. Agronomy 2020, 10, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, H.; Yasmin, F.; Song, B.H. Neglected treasures in the wild—Legume wild relatives in food security and human health. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 49, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Padulosi, S.; Thompson, J.; Rudebjer, P. Fighting Poverty, Hunger and Malnutrition with Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS): Needs, Challenges and the Way Forward. Bioversity International, Rome. 2019. Available online: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/_migrated/uploads/tx_news/Fighting_poverty__hunger_and_malnutrition_with_neglected_and_underutilized_species__NUS__1671.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  23. Hura, T.; Hura, K.; Grzesiak, M.; Rzepka, A. Effect of long-term drought stress on leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters in C3 and C4 plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 29, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarker, U.; Islam, M.T.; Oba, S. Salinity stress accelerates nutrients, dietary fiber, minerals, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in Amaranthus tricolor leaves. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 206388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Achigan-Dako, E.G.; Sogbohossou, O.E.D.; Maundu, P. Current knowledge on Amaranthus spp.: Research avenues for improved nutritional value and yield in leafy amaranths in sub-Saharan Africa. Euphytica 2014, 197, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alegbejo, J.O. Nutritional Value and Utilization of Amaranthus (Amaranthus spp.)—A Review. Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2014, 6, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Santiago-Saenz, Y.O.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Monroy-Torres, R.; Cariño-Cortés, R.; Jiménez-Alvarado, R. Physicochemical, nutritional and antioxidant characterization of three vegetables (Amaranthus hybridus L., Chenopodium berlandieri L., Portulaca oleracea L.) as potential sources of phytochemicals and bioactive compounds. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 2855–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdallah, A.; Zouhaier, B.; Rabhi, M.; Chedly, A.; Abderrazak, S. Environmental eco-physiology and economical potential of the halophyte Crithmum maritimum L. (Apiaceae). J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 3564–3571. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ventura, Y.; Myrzabayeva, M.; Alikulov, Z.; Omarov, R.; Khozin-Goldberg, I.; Sagi, M. Effects of salinity on flowering, morphology, biomass accumulation and leaf metabolites in an edible halophyte. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Renna, M. Reviewing the Prospects of Sea Fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) as Emerging Vegetable Crop. Plants 2018, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pereira, A.G.; Fraga-Corral, M.; García-Oliveira, P.; Jimenez-Lopez, C.; Lourenço-Lopes, C.; Carpena, M.; Otero, P.; Gullón, P.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Culinary and nutritional value of edible wild plants from northern Spain rich in phenolic compounds with potential health benefits. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 8493–8515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ozcan, M.; Ermen, O. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Turkish plant spices. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 212, 658–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishtiyaq, S.; Kumar, H.; Varun, M.; Ogunkunle, C.O.; Paul, M.S. Role of secondary metabolites in salt and heavy metal stress mitigation by halophytic plants: An overview. In Handbook of Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 307–327. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zenobi, S.; Fiorentini, M.; Ledda, L.; Deligios, P.; Aquilanti, L.; Orsini, R. Crithmum maritinum L. Biomass Production in Mediterranean Environment. Agronomy 2022, 12, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cunsolo, F.; Ruberto, G.; Amico, V.; Piattelli, M. Bioactive metabolites from Sicilian marine fennel Crithmum maritimum. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1598–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, H.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Shephard, A.; Hopwood, M.; Ma, W. Germinatin and emergence characteristics of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). Crop Protect. 2020, 136, 105222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maggini, R.; Benvenuti, S.; Leoni, F.; Incrocci, L.; Pardossi, A. Effects of NaCl on Hydroponic Cultivation of Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alexopoulos, A.A.; Assimakopoulou, A.; Panagopoulos, P.; Bakea, M.; Vidalis, N.; Karapanos, I.C.; Petropoulos, S.A. Impact of Salinity on the Growth and Chemical Composition of Two Underutilized Wild Edible Greens: Taraxacum officinale and Reichardia picroides. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pol, M.; Schmidtke, K.; Lewandowska, S. Plantago lanceolata—An overview of its agronomically and healing valuable features. Open Agric. 2021, 6, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Konopiński, M.; Nowak, L.; Mitura, R.; Skiba, D. Effect of different pre-sowing tillage on quantity and quality of parsnip (Pastinaca sativa L.) root yield in ridge cultivation. Acta Agrobot. 2011, 64, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, X.; Li, L.; Sun, Z.; Liang, X.; Wang, P. The cultivation Techniques of Plantago lanceolata L. in Guizhou Area, China. J. Anim. Sci. Vet. 2020, 2, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  42. D’Imperio, M.; Parente, A.; Montesano, F.F.; Renna, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Serio, F. Boron Biofortification of Portulaca oleracea L. through Soilless Cultivation for a New Tailored Crop. Agronomy 2020, 10, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Papadimitriou, D.M.; Daliakopoulos, I.N.; Kontaxakis, E.; Sabathanakis, M.; Manios, T.; Savvas, D. Effect of moderate salinity on Golden Thistle (Scolymus hispanicus L.) grown in a soilless cropping system. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2022, 303, 111182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Carrascosa, Á.; Pascual, J.A.; Ros, M.; Petropoulos, S.; del Mar Alguacil, M. The Effect of Fertilization Regime on Growth Parameters of Sonchus oleraceus and Two Genotypes of Portulaca oleracea. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 16, 7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Karkanis, A.; Bilalis, D.; Efthimiadou, A. Cultivation of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn.), a medicinal weed. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2011, 34, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Di Virgilio, N.; Papazoglou, E.G.; Jankauskiene, Z.; Di Lonardo, S.; Praczyk, M.; Wielgusz, K. The potential of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) as a crop with multiple uses. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 68, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bell, J.L.; Burke, I.C.; Neff, M.M. Genetic and Biochemical Evaluation of Natural Rubber from Eastern Washington Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Elansary, H.O.; Ali, H.M.; Elshikh, M.; Witczak, J.; Ahmad, M. Genetic Transformation and Hairy Root Induction Enhance the Antioxidant Potential of Lactuca serriola L. Oxid. Med. Cell. Long. 2017, 2017, 5604746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Awan, A.F.; Akhtar, M.S.; Anjum, I.; Mushtaq, M.N.; Fatima, A.; Mannan, A.; Ali, I. Anti-oxidant and hepatoprotective effects of Lactuca serriola and its phytochemical screening by HPLC and FTIR analysis. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 33, 2823–2830. [Google Scholar]
  50. Abou-Shanab, R.A.; Tammam, A.A.; El-Aggan, W.H.; Mubarak, M.M. Phytoremediation potential of wild plants collected from heavy metals contaminated soils. Int. J. Geol. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2017, 5, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  51. Johnson, W.; Jackson, L.; Ochoa, O.; van Wijk, R.; Peleman, J.; Clair, D.S.; Michelmore, R.W. Lettuce, a Shallow-Rooted Crop, and Lactuca serriola, Its Wild Progenitor, Differ at QTL Determining Root Architecture and Deep Soil Water Exploitation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chadha, A.; Florentine, S.K.; Chauhan, B.S.; Long, B.; Jayasundera, M. Influence of Soil Moisture Regimes on Growth, Photosynthetic Capacity, Leaf Biochemistry and Reproductive Capabilities of the Invasive Agronomic Weed; Lactuca serriola. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 218191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jeong, S.; Kim, T.M.; Choi, B.; Kim, Y.; Kim, E. Invasive Lactuca serriola seeds contain endophytic bacteria that contribute to drought tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kramer, M.; Bufler, G.; Nothnagel, T.; Carle, R.; Kammerer, D.R. Effects of cultivation conditions and cold storage on the polyacetylene contents of carrot (Daucus carota L.) and parsnip (Pastinaca sativa L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bearaa, I.N.; Lesjaka, M.M.; Orčića, D.Z.; Simina, N.Đ.; Četojević-Siminb, D.D.; Božinc, B.N.; Mimica-Dukića, N.M. Comparative analysis of phenolic profile, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activity of two closely-related Plantain species: Plantago altissima L. and Plantago lanceolata L. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quintero, C.; Bowers, M.D. Changes in plant chemical defenses and nutritional quality as a function of ontogeny in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). Oecologia 2012, 168, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wells, M.J.; Balsinhas, A.A.; Joffe, H.; Engelbrecht, V.M.; Harding, G.; Stirton, C.H. A Catalogue of Problem Plants in Southern Africa Incorporating the National Weed List of South Africa. Memoirs, Botanical Survey of South Africa; Botanical Research Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 1986; Volume 53, p. 658. [Google Scholar]
  58. CABI. Plantago Lanceolata (Ribwort Plantain); CABI Compendium; CABI International: Wallingford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Andreazza, R.; Okeke, B.C.; Pieniz, S.; Camargo, F.A. Characterization of copper-resistant rhizosphere bacteria from Avena sativa and Plantago lanceolata for copper bioreduction and biosorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 146, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Petropoulos, S.A.; Fernandes, Â.; Dias, M.I.; Vasilakoglou, I.B.; Petrotos, K.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C. Nutritional value, chemical composition and cytotoxic properties of common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) in relation to harvesting stage and plant part. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Böer, B.; Khan, M.A.; Marcum, K.B. World Halophyte Garden: Economic Dividends with Global Significance. In Sabkha Ecosystems. Tasks for Vegetation Science; Khan, M.A., Böer, B., Öztürk, M., Al Abdessalaam, T.Z., Clüsener-Godt, M., Gul, B., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Volume 47. [CrossRef]
  62. CABI. Portulaca oleracea (purslane). CABI Compendium, CABI International. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.43609 (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  63. Koch, K.E.; Kennedy, R.A. Crassulacean acid metabolism in the succulent C4 dicot, Portulaca oleracea L. under natural environmental conditions. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Srivastava, R.; Srivastava, V.; Singh, A. Multipurpose Benefits of an Underexplored Species Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.): A Critical Review. Environ. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dwivedi, S.; Mishra, A.; Kumar, A.; Tripathi, P.; Dave, R.; Dixit, G.; Tiwari, K.K.; Srivastava, S.; Shukla, M.K.; Tripathi, R.D. Bioremediation potential of genus Portulaca L. collected from industrial areas in Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Clean Technol. Environ. Pol. 2012, 14, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Deng, Z.; Zhang, R.; Shi, Y.; Hu, L.A.; Tan, H.; Cao, L. Characterization of Cd-, Pb-, Zn-resistant endophytic Lasiodiplodia sp. MXSF31 from metal accumulating Portulaca oleracea and its potential in promoting the growth of rape in metal-contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2014, 21, 2346–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Karakaş, S.; Cullu, M.A.; Dikilitaş, M. Comparison of two halophyte species (Salsola soda and Portulaca oleracea) for salt removal potential under different soil salinity conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2017, 41, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Barka, N.; Abdennouri, M.; Makhfouk, M.E. Removal of Methylene Blue and Eriochrome Black T from aqueous solutions by biosorption on Scolymus hispanicus L.: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2011, 42, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Barka, N.; Abdennouri, M.; Makhfouk, M.E. Biosorption characteristics of Cadmium (II) onto Scolymus hispanicus L. as low-cost natural biosorbent. Desalination 2010, 258, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Maggini, R.; Benvenuti, S.; Leoni, F.; Pardossi, A. Terracrepolo (Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth.): Wild food or new horticultural crop? Sci. Hortic. 2018, 240, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alexopoulos, A.A.; Marandos, E.; Assimakopoulou, A.; Vidalis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Karapanos, I.C. Effect of Nutrient Solution pH on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Taraxacum officinale and Reichardia picroides in a Floating Hydroponic System. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salonikioti, A.; Petropoulos, S.; Antoniadis, V.; Levizou, E.; Alexopoulos, A. Wild edible species with phytoremediation properties. Proc. Environ. Sci. 2015, 29, 98–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. De Paula Filho, G.X.; Barreira, T.F.; Pinheiro-Sant’Ana, H.M. Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Three Sonchus Species. Int. J. Food Sci. 2022, 2022, 4181656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rojas-Sandoval, J.; Acevedo-Rodríguez, P.; Popay, A.I. Sonchus oleraceus (common sowthistle) CABI Compendium, CABI International. 2022. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.50584 (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  75. Lewin, R.A. Biological flora of the British Isles. J. Ecol. 1948, 836, 203–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chauhan, B.S.; Gill, G.; Preston, C. Factors affecting seed germination of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) in southern Australia. Weed Sci. 2006, 54, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Khan, A.; Chaudhry, T.; Hayes, W.; Khoo, C.; Hill, L.; Fernandez, R.; Gallardo, P. Physical, chemical and biological characterisation of a steelworks waste site at Port Kembla, NSW, Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1998, 104, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Flora, K.; Hahn, M.; Rosen, H.; Benner, K. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum) for the Therapy of Liver Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 93, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bahmani, M.; Shirzad, H.; Rafieian, S.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Silybum marianum: Beyond Hepatoprotection. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 20, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Popay, I. Silybum Marianum (Variegated Thistle). CABI Compendium, CABI International. 2022. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.50304 (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  81. Demnerová, K.; Macková, M.; Kučerová, P.; Chromá, L.; Nováková, H.; Leigh, M.B.; Burkhard, J.; Pazlarová, J.; Macek, T. Bioremediation of PCBs from Contaminated Soil. In The Utilization of Bioremediation to Reduce Soil Contamination: Problems and Solutions; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 341–346. [Google Scholar]
  82. Shams, K.M.; Tichy, G.; Fischer, A.; Sager, M.; Peer, T.; Bashar, A.; Filip, K. Aspects of phytoremediation for chromium contaminated sites using common plants Urtica dioica, Brassica napus and Zea mays. Plant Soil 2010, 328, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sharifi, K.; Rahnavard, A.; Saeb, K.; Gholamreza Fahimi, F.; Tavana, A. Ability of Urtica dioica L. to adsorb heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As, and Ni) from contaminated soils. Soil Sediment Contam. 2023, 32, 51–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bacci, L.; Di Lonardo, S.; Albanese, L.; Mastromei, G.; Perito, B. Effect of different extraction methods on fiber quality of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). Text. Res. J. 2011, 81, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bhusal, K.K.; Magar, S.K.; Thapa, R.; Lamsa, L.A.; Bhandari, S.; Maharjan, R.; Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, J. Nutritional and pharmacological importance of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.): A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gülçin, I.; Küfrevioglu, O.I.; Oktay, M.; Büyükokuroglu, M.E. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 90, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Psaroudaki, A.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Skaracis, G.; Katsiotis, A. Genetic structure and population diversity of eleven edible herbs of Eastern Crete. J. Biol. Res. Thessalon. 2015, 22, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Padulosi, S.; Hodgkin, T.; Williams, J.T.; Haq, N. Underutilized crops: Trends, challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. In Proceedings of the Managing Plant Genetic Diversity, an International Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–16 June 2002; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK; pp. 323–338. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mabhaudhi, T.; Chimonyo, V.G.; Chibarabada, T.P.; Modi, A.T. Developing a roadmap for improving neglected and underutilized crops: A case study of South Africa. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Will, M. Promoting Value Chains of Neglected and Underutilized Species for Pro-Poor Growth and Biodiversity Conservation. Guidelines and Good Practices. Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species; Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species (GFU): Rome, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  91. European Commission. Key Policy Objectives of the New CAP. 2023. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/new-cap-2023-27/key-policy-objectives-new-cap_en#briefs (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  92. European Commission. Factsheet: From Farm to Fork: Our Food, Our Health, Our Planet, Our Future. 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/ (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  93. European Commission. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives. COM (2020) 380 Final. 2020. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380&from=EN (accessed on 20 November 2022).
Figure 1. Radar graph illustrating the number of Ecosystem Services that are related with the studied underutilized crops as described in Table 5.
Figure 1. Radar graph illustrating the number of Ecosystem Services that are related with the studied underutilized crops as described in Table 5.
Sustainability 15 04921 g001
Figure 2. Simplified value chain and life cycle stations of the underutilized crop products that should be thoroughly examined.
Figure 2. Simplified value chain and life cycle stations of the underutilized crop products that should be thoroughly examined.
Sustainability 15 04921 g002
Table 1. Potential provisioning and regulating ecosystem services of underutilized crops according to Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V 5.1.
Table 1. Potential provisioning and regulating ecosystem services of underutilized crops according to Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V 5.1.
SectionGroupClassCode
ProvisioningCultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energyCultivated terrestrial plants grown for nutritional purposes1.1.1.1
Cultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energyFibres and other materials from cultivated plants1.1.1.2
Cultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energyCultivated plants as source of energy1.1.1.3
Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energyWild plants used for nutrition1.1.5.1
Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energyFibres and other materials from wild plants1.1.5.2
Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energyWild plants as source of energy1.1.5.3
Genetic material from plants, algae or fungiSeeds, spores and other plant materials collected for maintaining or establishing a population1.2.1.1
Regulation & MaintenanceMediation of wastes or toxic substances of anthropogenic origin by living processesBio-remediation by micro-organisms, algae, plants, and animals2.1.1.1
Regulation of baseline flows and extreme eventsErosion control2.2.1.1
Pest and disease controlPest control2.2.3.1
Pest and disease controlDisease control
Atmospheric composition and conditionsRegulation of chemical composition of atmosphere and oceans (greenhouse gas emissions)2.2.6.1
Table 2. Major Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and specific targets related to underutilized crops cultivation.
Table 2. Major Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and specific targets related to underutilized crops cultivation.
GoalTarget
SDG2Zero Hunger2.3Achievement of twofold agricultural productivity and small-scale food producers incomes, including through secure and equal access to land, other productive resources and inputs, knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment
SDG2Zero Hunger2.4Achieve sustainable food production systems and develop resilient agricultural practices that support productivity and production, assist in maintaining ecosystems, enhance climate change adaptation, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and improve land and soil quality
SDG2Zero Hunger2.5Maintain genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants and animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, as internationally agreed
SDG6Clean Water and Sanitation6.6Protect and restore water-related ecosystems
SDG7Affordable and Clean Energy7.3Achievement of twofold the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency
SDG12Responsible Consumption and Production12.2Efficient use and sustainable management of natural resources
SDG13Climate Action13.2Integrate climate change measures into national strategies, planning, and policies
SDG15Life on Land15.1Prioritize and protect the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, in particular forests, wetlands, mountains and drylands, along with obligations under international agreements
SDG15Life on Land15.3Combat desertification, restore degraded land and soil, including land affected by desertification, drought and floods, and strive to achieve a land degradation-neutral world
SDG15Life on Land15.9Merge ecosystem and biodiversity values into national and local planning, development methods, poverty reduction strategies and accounts
Table 6. Underutilized crops’ potential benefits linked to EU policies related to environmentally friendly food production.
Table 6. Underutilized crops’ potential benefits linked to EU policies related to environmentally friendly food production.
EU PolicySpecific Objective–Action–CommitmentRelated Underutilized Crops’ Benefit
CAP 2023-27 1Support viable farm income and the resilience of the agricultural sector across the EU, in order to enhance long-term food security and agricultural diversity, as well as to ensure the economic sustainability of agricultural productionCrop diversification enhances food security and reduces substitution by specific main crops with varying economic output.
Contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing carbon sequestration, as well as promoting sustainable energyUnderutilized plants that are resilient and well adapted to abiotic stress require lower input in order to be productive, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions
Foster sustainable development and efficient management of natural resources such as water, soil and air, including by reducing chemical dependencyUnderutilized plants that are resilient and well adapted to abiotic stress require lower input in order to be productive, resulting in limited use of fertilizers and pesticides
Contribute to halting and reversing biodiversity loss, enhance ecosystem services and preserve habitats and landscapesCrop diversification could preserve ecosystem habitats
Improve response food produced in a sustainable wayUnderutilized crops have a high nutritional value that could substitute or complete a healthy daily diet
Farm to Fork Strategy 2Reduce by 50% the use of pesticides until 2030Underutilized plants could require limited use of pesticides
Reduce nutrient losses by at least 50%Underutilized plants could require limited use of fertilizers due to more efficient use of nutrients
Reduce the use of fertilizers by at least 20% until 2030
Creation of a healthy food environment which makes the healthy and sustainable choice the easy choiceUnderutilized crops have a high nutritional value that could substitute or complete a healthy daily diet
Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 3The losses of nutrients from fertilizers are reduced by 50%, resulting in the reduction of the use of fertilizers by at least 20%.Underutilized plants could require limited use of fertilizers
The risk and use of chemical pesticides is reduced by 50% and the use of more hazardous pesticides is reduced by 50%.Underutilized plants could require limited use of pesticides
1 Specific objectives were retrieved from [91] 2 Specific actions were retrieved from [92] 3 Specific commitments were retrieved from [93].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Platis, D.P.; Papoui, E.; Bantis, F.; Katsiotis, A.; Koukounaras, A.; Mamolos, A.P.; Mattas, K. Underutilized Vegetable Crops in the Mediterranean Region: A Literature Review of Their Requirements and the Ecosystem Services Provided. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064921

AMA Style

Platis DP, Papoui E, Bantis F, Katsiotis A, Koukounaras A, Mamolos AP, Mattas K. Underutilized Vegetable Crops in the Mediterranean Region: A Literature Review of Their Requirements and the Ecosystem Services Provided. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6):4921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Platis, Dimitrios P., Eleni Papoui, Filippos Bantis, Andreas Katsiotis, Athanasios Koukounaras, Andreas P. Mamolos, and Konstadinos Mattas. 2023. "Underutilized Vegetable Crops in the Mediterranean Region: A Literature Review of Their Requirements and the Ecosystem Services Provided" Sustainability 15, no. 6: 4921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop