Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Sustainability Development for Waste Management through National–Local Policy Dynamics
Next Article in Special Issue
Arsenic Distribution and Pollution in Three Mountain Streams (Anzasca Valley, Italian Central Alps)
Previous Article in Journal
Rhizobium Grants the Reduction of Phosphate Fertilization during the Production of Coffee Seedlings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Legacy Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) Pollution in a River Ecosystem: Sediment Contamination and Bioaccumulation in Benthic Invertebrates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutrient Sequestration by Two Aquatic Macrophytes on Artificial Floating Islands in a Constructed Wetland

by
Zhaozhe Chen
1 and
Ozeas S. Costa, Jr.
2,*
1
School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus Campus, 125 South Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Mansfield Campus, 1760 University Drive, Mansfield, OH 44906, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6553; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086553
Submission received: 25 February 2023 / Revised: 5 April 2023 / Accepted: 8 April 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023

Abstract

Artificial floating islands (AFIs) have been documented as an efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective solution to address nutrient pollution. However, most AFI studies to date have been conducted in controlled experiments, and AFI applications in natural settings, particularly in the U.S. Midwest, are limited. Here, we present the results of a combination of field and mesocosm experiments with two native aquatic plant species (Carex comosa and Eleocharis palustris) in a constructed wetland in north-central Ohio. Results showed that C. comosa outperformed E. palustris with respect to biomass accumulation and root system development. In natural conditions, C. comosa had a total dry biomass production of 58.5 ± 22.2 g/plug compared to 6.1 ± 3.2 g/plug in E. palustris. The maximum estimated mean nutrient storage for C. comosa was 20.24 g/m2 of N and 1.33 g/m2 of P, whereas it was 2.31 g/m2 of N and 0.17 g/m2 of P for E. palustris. In addition, the more developed root system of C. comosa suggests that AFIs containing this plant have better total nutrient removal capacity. The growth conditions of both species were significantly impacted by seasonal dynamics with respect to their biomass production and root elongation, as evidenced by reduced growth towards the end of the growing season.
Keywords: artificial floating island; eutrophication; nutrient pollution; phytoremediation; aquatic plants artificial floating island; eutrophication; nutrient pollution; phytoremediation; aquatic plants

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Costa, O.S., Jr. Nutrient Sequestration by Two Aquatic Macrophytes on Artificial Floating Islands in a Constructed Wetland. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086553

AMA Style

Chen Z, Costa OS Jr. Nutrient Sequestration by Two Aquatic Macrophytes on Artificial Floating Islands in a Constructed Wetland. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8):6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhaozhe, and Ozeas S. Costa, Jr. 2023. "Nutrient Sequestration by Two Aquatic Macrophytes on Artificial Floating Islands in a Constructed Wetland" Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086553

APA Style

Chen, Z., & Costa, O. S., Jr. (2023). Nutrient Sequestration by Two Aquatic Macrophytes on Artificial Floating Islands in a Constructed Wetland. Sustainability, 15(8), 6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop