Review Reports
- Garima1,*,
- Atul Dhingra2 and
- Piera Centobelli3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Mahantesh Shirur Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Gabriela Chiciudean
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have taken a relevant study on agripureneurship. I suggest the authors to resubmit the article adding depth to the results of the study. The language of the paper needs major revision as there are many grammatical and structural deficiencies in the write up.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Kindly find the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Kindly find the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Dear authors,
I appreciate your reseach but the paper needs seriou improvements. The introduction section comprises too many theoretical issues (definition of agriculture ) instead of offering some relevant data regarding the agriculture in India.
The methodology needs some references since you describe a method which is not yours
Results and discusion section can be improved by consulting other researches as well and comment the similarities or by the contrary, the differences between your country and others.
More implications of your study can be mentioned.
Good luck
Author Response
Kindly find the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have attempted to address the issues raised in the review.
Reviewer 3 Report
Dear authors,
Now you improved your paper.
Good luck