Forecasting and Coupled Coordination Analysis of Supply and Demand for Sustainable Talent in Chinese Agriculture
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report (New Reviewer)
The article "Forecasting and coupled coordination analysis of supply and demand for sustainable talent in Chinese agriculture" is well written and well structured. All the parts of this articles from abstract to conclusion are well managed. The methods and findings are also satisfactory. I recommend this article for publication after these important revisions.
1. I have only concern about the results validations, the authors failed to validate the findings of this paper in accordance with existing research. Thus, it is highly recommended to validate the results in line with existing research, and report the reasons if the results are contrary to the existing research.
2. Please note to the abstract part where on line 20 the word "de-creasing" should be written as decreasing and similarly on line 24 the word " re-sources" need to be written as resources.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)
1. The article lacks a literature review section, which is necessary for sorting out existing research
2. There is a bit of a problem with the order of the chapters, it seems that the model structure of 3.1.1 is more suitable to be placed in 2.2.1
3. Lack of comparative experiments, the author should be comparing other models to prove the accuracy of the proposed model
4. Before making predictions, the paper model needs to undergo model training to achieve fitting results
5. Suggest adding prediction result indicators, (MSE) and (MAE). It is suggested to quote the literature: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136199
6. Is the discussion and results section incorrect?
The English language is generally acceptable, but it is recommended to find a native speaker to help revise it
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)
The author has revised the key issues and now meets the publishing standards
1.It is recommended to use specialized drawing software to redraw Figure 3 for clearer clarity
2.In the conclusion section, it is recommended to start a separate paragraph for future research and research limitations
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I would like to recommend rejecting this paper, therefore the authors no need to reply to me. Firstly of all, I am so sad to review for such as a low quality and meaningless paper during the holiday. This topic should be a hot topic, but the authors deliver it in a boring way, and with low level mistakes (grammar problems, typing mistakes, and not beautiful figures). Secondly, I believe the authors are using different approaches, but why those approaches are necessary and suitable in this study are not well delivered. It seems like just a list of methods. Of course, the contents and research structure are not well designed, which make the readers have no interests and lead to the low quality of this paper. Thirdly, the conclusions and suggestions are too basic and not meaningful, as well not applicable. As well, suggestions for other developing countries should be provided as well. I am so sad for that I not even find one point which touch me, which make me quite sad. Since I can not agree with the significance of this paper and do not think the paper is in good quality, I would like to recommend rejecting this paper and hope the authors can receive positive comments from other reviewers .
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Why did you calculate the GDP growth and the incomes of rural residents at an average annual rate of 5.5%?
Explain why the prediction effect is poor in Shanxi and Zhejian.
Why did you not take into consideration the agricultural industry structure and the economic development level in the analysis of supply and demand of agricultural talent?
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
