Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Model Development and Hypothesis
3.1. Functional Value and Purchase Intention
3.2. Social Value and Purchase Intention
3.3. Emotional Value and Purchase Intention
3.4. Religious Value and Purchase Intention
3.5. Knowledge Value and Purchase Intention
4. Methodology
4.1. Research Questionnaire
4.2. Data Collection and Sample
4.3. Data Analysis Techniques
5. Results
5.1. Repondents’ Profiles
5.2. Measurement Model Evaluation
5.3. Structural Model Evaluation
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Piratti, M.; Cattelan, V. Islamic Green Finance. In Islamic Social Finance; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 144–172. [Google Scholar]
- Musari, K. P2P Lending & Philanthropy Platform: A New Face of Asian Digital Fnancial Inclusion (Evidence from Indonesia). In Digital Transformation Management: Challenges and Futures in the Asian Digital Economy; Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: Oxford, UK, 2022; pp. 185–206. [Google Scholar]
- Musari, K. A Comparative Study of Islamic Fscal Instrument Securitization in History to Modern Ages: Esham, Sukuk, Cash Waqf Linked Sukuk (CWLS). In Handbook of Research on Challenges in Public Economics in the Era of Globalization; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 397–418. [Google Scholar]
- Buana, G.; Musari, K. A New Sphere of Sukuk: Linking Pandemic to Paris Agreement; The World Financial Review: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- The Financial Services Authority. Laporan Kajian Pengembangan Green Bond Di Indonesia. 2016. Available online: https://ojk.go.id/sustainable-finance/id/publikasi/riset-dan-statistik/Documents/Pengembangan%20%20Green%20%20Bonds%20%20di%20Indonesia.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia. Indonesia’s Green Bond & Green Sukuk Initiative. 2021. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/id/Green-Sukuk-Handbook-2021.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia. Pemerintah Semakin Fokus Kembangkan Green Sukuk Lewat G20. 2022. Available online: https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/baca/2022/07/06/4353-pemerintah-semakin-fokus-kembangkan-green-sukuk-lewat-g20 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Afriano, I. Emisi Green Bond Pertama di Indonesia Tak Sesuai Ekspektasi. 2018. Available online: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20180702202024-17-21517/emisi-green-bond-pertama-di-indonesia-tak-sesuai-ekspektasi?page=all (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Lee, K. Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2008, 26, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boztepe, A. Green marketing and its impact on consumer buying behavior. Eur. J. Econ. Polit. Stud. 2012, 5, 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- Tseng, S.C.; Hung, S.W. A framework identifying the gaps between customers’ expectations and their perceptions in green products. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 59, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mainardes, E.W.; de Araujo, D.V.B.; Lasso, S.; Andrade, D.M. Influences on the intention to buy organic food in an emerging market. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2017, 35, 858–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Straughan, R.D.; Roberts, J.A. Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. J. Consum. Mark. 1999, 16, 558–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalafatis, S.P.; Pollard, M.; East, R.; Tsogas, M.H. Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. J. Consum. Mark. 1999, 16, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevriana, L.; Febrian, E.; Anwar, M.; Ahmad Faisal, Y. A proposition to implement inclusive Islamic financial planning in Indonesia through bibliometric analysis. J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res. 2022; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A.; Roy, M. Green products: An exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A.; Roy, M. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: Testing the structural model. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 95, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, M.K.; Aliyu, S.; Paltrinieri, A.; Khan, A. A Review of Islamic Investment Literature. Econ. Pap. 2018, 38, 345–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Sharia Board—Indonesian Council of Ulama. Islamic Bonds; National Sharia Board—Indonesian Council of Ulama: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2002; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- International Capital Market Association. Green Bonds Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds. International Capital Market Association. 2021. Available online: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/%0Adocuments/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Green-Bond-PrinciplesJune-2021-140621.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- International Capital Market Association. The Green Bond Principles 2017; International Capital Market Association: Zürich, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Climate Bonds Initiative. Green Bonds Global State of the Market 2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi_sotm_2019_vol1_04d.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Liu, F.H.M.; Lai, K.P.Y. Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environ. Plan. A 2021, 53, 1896–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morea, D.; Poggi, L.A. An innovative model for the sustainability of investments in the wind energy sector: The use of green sukuk in an Italian case study. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2017, 7, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Khawaja, M.; Bhatti, M.I.; Ashraf, D. Ownership and control in a double decision framework for raising capita. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 2019, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, M.S.; Keshminder, J.S. What drives green sukuk? A leader’s perspective. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 2022, 12, 985–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abubakar, L.; Handayani, T. Green sukuk: Sustainable financing instruments for infrastructure development in Indonesia. Proc. 1st Borobudur Int. Symp. Humanit. Econ. Soc. Sci. 2020, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia. The Republic of Indonesia Green Bond and Green Sukuk Framework. 2019. Available online: https://api-djppr.kemenkeu.go.id/web/api/v1/media/B51F74A2-F8BF-47C7-A77F-DA48C2D33067 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values: Discovery Service for Air Force Institute of Technology. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.O.; Jin, B. Korean consumers’ patronage of discount stores: Domestic vs multinational discount store shoppers’ profiles. J. Consum. Mark. 2001, 18, 236–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M.M.; Schiffman, L.G. Consumption values and relationships: Segmenting the market for frequency programs. J. Consum. Mark. 2000, 17, 214–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, P.; Dhir, A.; Talwar, S.; Ghuman, K. The value proposition of food delivery apps from the perspective of theory of consumption value. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 33, 1129–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, H.; Suhartanto, D.; Ali, M.; Ghazali, M.F.; Hamid, R.; Abdul Razak, D. Determinants of choice behaviour of Islamic investment products in Malaysia. J. Islam. Mark. 2022; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, T.T.; Suki, N.M.; Fam, K. Exploring a consumption value model for Islamic mobile banking adoption. J. Islam. Mark. 2014, 5, 344–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohd Suki, N.; Mohd Suki, N. Consumption values and consumer environmental concern regarding green products. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2015, 22, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashiabi, N.; Nketiah-Amponsah, E.; Senadza, B. The effect of health expenditure on selected maternal and child health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2016, 43, 1386–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoukat, A.; Baig, U.; Hussain, B.; Abdul Rehman, N.; Khurram Shakir, D. An Empirical Study of Consumption Values on Green Purchase Intention. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2021, 10, 140–148. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.N.; Mohsin, M. The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 150, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, M.T.; Jacob, J. The relationship between green perceived quality and green purchase intention: A three-path mediation approach using green satisfaction and green trust. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2018, 15, 301–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basov, S.; Bhatti, M.I. Islamic Finance in the Light of Modern Economic Theory; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Moghul, U.F.; Safar-Aly, S.H. Green Sukuk: The Introduction of Islam’s Environmental Ethics to Contemporary Islamic Finance. Georg. Int. Environ. Law Rev. 2014, 27, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
- Syafiq, M.A.; Keshminder, J.S. Religion and pro-environmental behaviour: A comparative analysis towards environmental protection. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 19, 174–194. [Google Scholar]
- Muhamad, N.; Mizerski, D. The constructs mediating religions’ influence on buyers and consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2010, 1, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, L.T.; Tan, B.C. Religiosity As An Antecedent Of Attitude Towards Green Products: An Exploratory Research On Young Malaysian Consumers. ASEAN Mark. J. 2013, 1, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bananuka, J.; Mukyala, V.; Tumwebaze, Z.; Ssekakubo, J.; Kasera, M.; Najjuma, M.S. The intention to adopt Islamic financing in emerging economies: Evidence from Uganda. J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res. 2020, 11, 610–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaawaase, T.K.; Nalukwago, L. Religiosity and Islamic Banking in Uganda. Makerere Bus. J. 2017, 13, 70–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khayruzzaman, S. Impact of Religiosity on Buying Behavior of Financial Products: A Literature Review. Int. J. Financ. Bank. Res. 2016, 2, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.; Shabbir, M.S. The relationship between religiosity and new product adoption. J. Islam. Mark. 2010, 1, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ateke, B.W.; Didia, J.U.D. Consumer Knowledge and Purchase Intention of Healthcare Product Consumers in Rivers State. J. Bus. Law Res. 2018, 6, 1–7. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Didia-James/publication/348665528_Consumer_Knowledge_and_Purchase_Intention_of_Healthcare_Product_Consumers_in_Rivers_State/links/600a229f45851553a05fdea5/Consumer-Knowledge-and-Purchase-Intention-of-Healthcare-Product (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Lamb, P.; Peretiatko, R. Green decisions: Demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007, 31, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cătoiu, I.; Vrânceanu, D.M.; Filip, A. Setting fair prices–fundamental principle of sustainable marketing. Amfiteatru Econ. J. 2010, 12, 115–128. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, J.M.-S.; Wang, E.S.-T.; Lin, J.Y.-C.; Vivek, S.D. Why do customers utilize the internet as a retailing platform?:A view from consumer perceived value. Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist. 2009, 21, 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerstetter, D.; Cho, M.H. Prior knowledge, credibility and information search. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004, 31, 961–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Bai, R. How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bang, H.K.; Ellinger, A.E.; Hadjimarcou, J.; Traichal, P.A. Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychol. Mark. 2000, 17, 449–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moslehpour, M.; Chau, K.Y.; Du, L.; Qiu, R.; Lin, C.Y.; Batbayar, B. Predictors of green purchase intention toward eco-innovation and green products: Evidence from Taiwan. Econ. Res. Istraz. 2022, 36, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Han, H. Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel—A modification of the theory of planned behavior. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 997–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Peng, N. Green hotel knowledge and tourists’ staying behavior. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 2211–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, A.; Salehzadeh, R.; Panahi, R.; Abolghasemian, S. Multiple pathways linking environmental knowledge and awareness to employees’ green behavior. Corp. Gov. 2018, 18, 81–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, S.; Tarun, M.T. Effect of consumption values on customers’ green purchase intention: A mediating role of green trust. Soc. Responsib. J. 2021, 17, 1320–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alotaibi, A.; Abbas, A. Islamic religiosity and green purchase intention: A perspective of food selection in millennials. J. Islam. Mark. 2022; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurhayati, T.; Hendar, H. Personal intrinsic religiosity and product knowledge on halal product purchase intention: Role of halal product awareness. J. Islam. Mark. 2020, 11, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelik, G.T.; Oral, E.L. Big Five and Organizational Commitment-The Case of Turkish Construction Professionals. Hum. Resour. Manag. Res. 2016, 6, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekaran, U.; Bougie, R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach; John Wiley & Sonsy: Chichester, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, D.R.; Schindler, P.S. Business Research Methods, 12th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.; Sinkovics, R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–320. [Google Scholar]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance performance map analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 1865–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Bengart, P.; Shaltoni, A.M.; Lehmann, S. The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. Int. J. Advert. 2018, 37, 650–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- El Saleh, A.I.; Jurdi, D.J. Stock performance under alternative Shariah screening methods: Evidence from Australia. Account. Financ. 2021, 61, 4339–4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramayah, T.; Rahman, S.A.; Ling, N.C. How do consumption values influence online purchase intention among school leavers in Malaysia? Rev. Bras. Gest. Negocios 2018, 20, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, P.C.; Huang, Y.H. The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption value. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 22, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forghani, M.H.; Kazemi, A.; Ranjbarian, B. Religion, peculiar beliefs and luxury cars’ consumer behavior in Iran. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worthington, E.L.; Wade, N.G.; Hight, T.L.; Ripley, J.S.; McCullough, M.E.; Berry, J.W.; Schmitt, M.M.; Berry, J.T.; Bursley, K.H.; O’Connor, L. The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. J. Couns. Psychol. 2003, 50, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madni, A.R.; Hamid, N.A.; Rashid, S.M. An Association between Religiosity and Consumer Behavior: A Conceptual Piece. J. Commer. 2016, 8, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, A.N.; Rahman, A.A.; Rahman, S.A. Assessing Knowledge and Religiosity on Consumer Behavior towards Halal Food and Cosmetic Products. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2015, 5, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunau, P.; Lang, J. Retraining for the unemployed and the quality of the job match. Appl. Econ. 2020, 52, 5098–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrrawal, P.; Waggle, D. The Dispersion of ETF Betas on Financial Websites. J. Investig. 2010, 19, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Numbers | Percentages | |
---|---|---|---|
Male | |||
Male | 119 | 39.67 | |
Female | 181 | 60.33 | |
Age | |||
<20 | 5 | 1.67 | |
21–30 | 167 | 55.67 | |
31–40 | 55 | 18.33 | |
41–50 | 44 | 14.67 | |
51–60 | 19 | 6.33 | |
>60 | 10 | 3.33 | |
Education | |||
Senior High School | 55 | 18.33 | |
Undergraduate | 148 | 49.33 | |
Postgraduate | 97 | 32.33 | |
Jobs | |||
Civil Servant | 73 | 24.33 | |
Lectures/Teacher | 54 | 18.00 | |
Professionals | 96 | 32.00 | |
Students | 66 | 22.00 | |
General public | 11 | 3.67 |
Constructs (Cronbach’s Alpha) | Loading | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|
Functional value (0.921) | |||
Green sukuk investment has quality standards that are acceptable to the public. | 0.911 | 0.809 | 0.944 |
Green sukuk investment provides a more stable rate of return. | 0.900 | ||
Investing in green sukuk is beneficial for society and the environment. | 0.911 | ||
Investing in green sukuk offers the best value for money. | 0.875 | ||
Social value (0.755) | |||
Investing in green sukuk can improve my perception. | 0.729 | 0.655 | 0.850 |
Investing in green sukuk will make a good impression on others. | 0.885 | ||
Investing in green sukuk will improve my social status. | 0.806 | ||
Emotional value (0.946) | |||
Investing in green sukuk instead of conventional products will feel like making a good personal contribution to something better. | 0.958 | 0.901 | 0.965 |
Making a green sukuk investment instead of a conventional product will feel like the morally right thing to do. | 0.938 | ||
Making green sukuk investments instead of conventional products will make me feel like a better human being. | 0.952 | ||
Religious value (0.909) | |||
Green sukuk is a financial instrument that complies with Sharia or Islamic law. | 0.888 | 0.785 | 0.936 |
Green sukuk is an Islamic investment instrument that is usury-free. | 0.904 | ||
As a Muslim, I must buy investment instruments in green sukuk. | 0.879 | ||
Green sukuk is an investment instrument that has low gharar. | 0.872 | ||
Knowledge value (0.948) | |||
I know the definition and existence of green sukuk. | 0.932 | 0.866 | 0.963 |
I know the difference between green sukuk and bonds. | 0.950 | ||
I know the principles of green sukuk. | 0.945 | ||
I know how to invest in green sukuk. | 0.894 | ||
Purchase intention (0.914) | |||
I will likely participate in green sukuk investments in the future. | 0.932 | 0.854 | 0.946 |
I hope to participate in green sukuk investment in the future. | 0.931 | ||
I will definitely participate in green sukuk investment. | 0.910 |
H | Relationship | Estimate | t-Value | p-Value | Results | R2 | F2 | Q2 | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | FV -> PI | 0.470 | 6.868 | 0.000 | Supported | 0.616 | 0.249 | 0.520 | 2.309 |
H2 | SV -> PI | 0.073 | 2.111 | 0.037 | Supported | 0.013 | 1.055 | ||
H3 | EV -> PI | 0.065 | 1.789 | 0.052 | Supported | 0.009 | 1.196 | ||
H4 | RV -> PI | 0.308 | 4.382 | 0.000 | Supported | 0.120 | 2.052 | ||
H5 | KV -> PI | 0.116 | 2.018 | 0.041 | Supported | 0.023 | 1.521 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Faisal, Y.A.; Gunawan, I.; Cupian; Hayati, A.; Apriliadi, A.; Fajri, M. Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
Faisal YA, Gunawan I, Cupian, Hayati A, Apriliadi A, Fajri M. Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk. Sustainability. 2023; 15(9):7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
Chicago/Turabian StyleFaisal, Yudi Ahmad, Indra Gunawan, Cupian, Amelia Hayati, Ardi Apriliadi, and Muhammad Fajri. 2023. "Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk" Sustainability 15, no. 9: 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
APA StyleFaisal, Y. A., Gunawan, I., Cupian, Hayati, A., Apriliadi, A., & Fajri, M. (2023). Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk. Sustainability, 15(9), 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430