Next Article in Journal
Calculation Method of Material Accumulation Rate at the Front of Trunk Glaciers Based on Satellite Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Literacy Differences Based on Gender Identity and Race: A Social Justice Concern
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Data-Driven Procedure for Product Specification Recommendation Optimization with LDA-LightGBM and QFD
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Sustainable Risk Management Model and Instruments for Young Farmers in EU Agriculture

Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010283
by Aleksandra Figurek 1,*, Katerina Morphi 2 and Alkis Thrassou 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010283
Submission received: 28 November 2023 / Revised: 17 December 2023 / Accepted: 26 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor revision

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript. Please find my comments in the attached referee report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language


Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article discusses a very original topic. The authors therefore found an interesting and valuable research gap. They actually justified it and supported it with good literature studies. Agriculture is crucial for the quality of life of societies. It also determines the future of nutrition. Preventing young people from leaving the sector is therefore extremely important theoretically and practically. The risk assessment methodology proposed by the authors is very good, transparent and correct. The graphic material allows you to better understand the presented content and is carefully prepared. The literature is extensive and properly used. However, the authors could have articulated the purpose more precisely in the abstract and deepened the discussion to enhance the scientific value of the text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for addressing my comments. I think the authors addressed them well and I have no further comments.

Back to TopTop