Next Article in Journal
Trend Changes and the Driving Forces of Environmental Indicators in Countries Worldwide: A Structural Change Analysis of Variations in CO2 Emissions and Eco-Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Considerations for Eco-LeanSat Satellite Manufacturing and Recycling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Green Emotion: Incorporating Emotional Perception in Green Marketing to Increase Green Furniture Purchase Intentions

College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 4935; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124935
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 30 May 2024 / Accepted: 4 June 2024 / Published: 8 June 2024

Abstract

:
The industrialization process has led to environmental deterioration, which has created challenges for sustainable development. However, there is an increasing inclination to purchase green furniture as a sustainable form of furniture. Hence, investigating the determinants of consumers’ intention to purchase green furniture is beneficial for promoting the adoption of sustainable furniture. Previous research has examined the functional aspects of purchasing behavior using the theory of planned behavior (TPB), while giving less consideration to affective elements. This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence the intention of future users to purchase green furniture, explicitly focusing on emotional perception. This study utilized the PAD three-dimensional emotion model. A novel conceptual model was developed, drawing upon the findings of the literature review. This study employed the questionnaire method to collect data, resulting in 412 valid samples. The collected data were then analyzed and processed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 3.0 software. Additionally, the mediating influence of the variables was examined using the bootstrap method. The results suggested that the perceived pleasure, arousal, and dominance all had a substantial influence on the beneficial effect of green furniture elements on purchase intention. Among these factors, pleasure (PP) had the strongest mediating effect on the relationship between green brand image (GBI) and purchase intention (PI). Arousal (PA) had the strongest mediating effect on the relationship between eco-innovation (EI) and purchase intention (PI). Dominance (PD) had the strongest mediating effect on the relationship between purchase customization (PC) and purchase intention (PI). Furthermore, this paper examined the disparities between the characteristics of green furniture and conventional furniture in terms of their ability to stimulate emotional responses and influence consumers’ intention to purchase. This study revealed that green features (GF) have a greater capacity to evoke emotional responses in consumers, consequently impacting their intention to purchase green furniture. The study’s findings have both theoretical implications and practical relevance. In theory, these findings enhance the theoretical framework of purchase intention for green furniture. In practice, they provide specific ideas and recommendations for green furniture companies to develop emotional marketing strategies.

1. Introduction

Anthropogenic industrial activities release excessive amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane. These emissions significantly alter the physical and chemical qualities of soil, air, and salt water. Furthermore, they contribute to unforeseen climate shifts, including famines, severe thunderstorms, and rising temperatures [1]. Scientists believe that human activities contribute to global warming, which might increase the global temperature by around 10 °C. The rate of anthropogenic global warming is expected to grow by 0.2 °C per decade, with a range of 0.1 to 0.3 °C [2]. As a result, environmental issues are becoming increasingly important and complicated. Ecological sustainability is gaining traction as customers become more environmentally sensitive and industrialization accelerates. The furniture business is seeing the rise of sustainable materials and eco-friendly designs due to increased awareness regarding the environmental problems caused by manufacturing and consumption [3]. As a result, there has been a recent surge in the popularity of green furniture.
Over the last ten years, furniture sales in China have increased significantly. In 2018, the Chinese furniture market was valued at CNY 900 billion. Sustainable furniture, sometimes called ‘green furniture’, is a critical emphasis for the future development of China’s furniture sector [4]. Green furniture requires eco-friendly raw materials, ecologically conscious disassembly design, environmentally friendly clean production practices, and green packing materials, among other things. Simply put, it reduces furniture’s environmental and natural impact at every stage of its life cycle, from raw material selection to design, production, packaging, sales, consumption, disposal, and recycling. Furthermore, it poses no hazards to the safety of either customers or employees [5]. The manufacturing process combines environmental concerns to reduce its negative impact on human health and the environment [6]. Innovative designs, long-lasting construction, and ecological friendliness define green furniture. Green design elements are integrated throughout the product’s life cycle, from design to manufacture, use, and recycling. This integration seeks to improve the quality of furniture design and production, revolutionize the traditional furniture business, meet the growing customer demand for eco-friendly furniture, and promote the harmonious coexistence of humans and nature [7].
Consumers can contribute to a more sustainable and eco-friendly future by buying environmentally conscious products and practicing responsible consumption [8]. The consumer buying process involves a series of stages, from recognizing needs to post-purchase assessment [9]. Van (2013) [10] categorized the buying process into five phases: activation, configuration, browsing, purchase, and decision, excluding post-purchase review. Consumers undergo these stages at varying rates based on individual traits, situational influences, and product types [11]. Consumers engage in a complex cognitive process involving a sequence of emotional impressions while making purchase decisions. Emotional perception entails recognizing emotional states in behavior or surroundings, encompassing emotions, attitudes, emotional intents, and behavioral displays [12], as seen in Figure 1.
Yu et al. (2023) [13] investigated the effects of individual psychological and trait factors on customer purchasing decisions, behaviors, and preferences. This study’s findings showed that psychological aspects influence consumers’ purchasing decisions. Most prior researchers used the Theory of Planned Behaviour, a model biased toward functional rationality, to investigate the intention to purchase green furniture. However, this research has yet to explore its psychological or emotional impact. As a result, this work addresses the research gap. This article divides emotional perception variables into green and traditional aspects. We use the PAD (pleasure, arousal, and dominance) emotional model to examine how emotional perception affects potential users’ intentions to buy green furniture. The goal is to find specific aspects of green furniture that potential customers value, hence increasing the popularity and sales of green furniture. Examining the impact of emotional perception on the intention to buy environmentally friendly furniture can help researchers to better understand consumers’ psychological characteristics during the shopping process. This analysis will help marketers to design a marketing plan for green furniture by examining the critical emotional elements influencing the chance of acquiring such products. The relevant data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and SmartPLS 3.0 software. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is a statistical tool for measuring and investigating the relationship between observable and latent variables. This method, like regression analysis, but with greater statistical power, can analyze linear causal relationships between variables. This study investigates the following inquiries.
  • How do green furniture’s green and traditional characteristics affect consumers’ emotional perceptions?
  • How do consumers’ emotional perceptions, specifically their perceived pleasure, arousal, and dominance, influence their intentions to purchase green furniture?
  • Does PAD 3D significantly mediate the relationship between green furniture characteristics and green purchase intentions?
  • Is there a notable distinction between green furniture’s green and conventional characteristics in terms of evoking an emotional reaction from consumers and their inclination to make a purchase?
  • Do consumers’ demographic variables, such as gender, age, and educational background, have varying emotional effects on their inclinations to purchase green furniture?

2. Literature Review

Research has demonstrated the feasibility of integrating structural equation modelling with the PAD emotional model in past studies. By conceptually applying the PAD (pleasure, arousal, and dominance) three-dimensional emotional model to analyze the emotional aspects of brand applications, Hsieh et al. (2021) [14] investigated the factors influencing brand application ambience in brand relationships. Using the PAD three-dimensional emotional model, Cho and Lee (2017) [15] examined how interior color choices affect consumer emotions, preferences, and perceptions of luxury products in an upmarket retail environment. Yang and Kim (2020) [16] employed the PAD model to investigate how website attributes impact the emotional strain process of a fashion brand, along with the three emotion dimensions that mediate the influence of fashion brand website behavioral reactions. All of the publications above used a blend of the PAD emotional model and structural equations to investigate factors empirically. Wei et al. (2023) [17] studied how interior colored illumination in rural homes impacts individuals’ moods and visual perceptions. The experimental results were analyzed statistically using the PAD emotional model mapped to eight primary emotions to construct an emotion dimension model. The PAD emotional model analyzes the aspects that impact consumers’ emotional perception.
Prior studies have thoroughly examined the factors influencing people’s desire to make environmentally friendly purchases. Several studies have looked into the impact of social media on adolescents’ intentions to buy ecologically friendly products, taking into account aspects like subjective norms and perceived green values (Xie and Madni 2023 [18]). Another study examined how a green brand image and customer environmental views influence the relationship between green marketing and green purchasing intentions (Majeed et al., 2022 [19]). Another study also investigated the function of customer attention as a mediator between environmental concerns, environmental knowledge, green product eco-innovation, and green purchase intention (Moslehpour et al., 2023 [20]). Using the idea of the planned behavior model as a framework, Xu et al. (2020 [21]) investigated the factors influencing consumers’ propensity to purchase authentic green furniture. Finally, a study evaluated the factors influencing Da Nang residents’ decisions to buy environmentally friendly furniture using the theory of planned behavior and its modifications (Le and Quang, 2023 [3]). Klabi and Binzafrah (2022) [22] conducted the first study of the sequential mediation model, which included environmental concern, self-conformity to a green image, faith in a green brand, and desire to engage in green purchasing. However, past research on green furniture mainly focused on the intention to purchase as a deliberate activity and used utility-oriented models. Only a few studies have looked into the emotional and perceptual components of selecting green furniture.
This investigation offers significant theoretical insights. In their study, Yu et al. (2023) [23] examined the primary determinants of consumer furniture purchases using hierarchical analysis. They found that product indicators were the most significant elements, followed by personal and service factors. This paper also includes individual traits, qualities of the product, and socio-cultural influences. Based on prior research, the elements that influence the intention to purchase green furniture may be categorized into green qualities and traditional characteristics, as illustrated in Table 1. This study utilizes the PAD three-dimensional emotional model to examine how specific characteristics influence purchase intention through three-dimensional affective mediation. It also aims to compare the differences in the influencing mechanism between green and traditional characteristics. Additionally, this study conducts a multi-cluster structural equation analysis of consumers’ demographic characteristics. This study aims to enhance consumers’ satisfaction with environmentally friendly furniture and their intention to make more environmentally friendly purchases.

3. Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses

3.1. PAD 3D Emotional Model

Mehrabian and Russell (1974) [24] introduced a concept revolving around three emotions: pleasure, arousal, and dominance (PAD). The PAD three-dimensional emotional model classifies human emotions into three fundamental categories. Pleasure (P) represents emotional variability and measures how an individual experiences happiness, joy, or contentment in their surroundings. Arousal (A) refers to emotional arousal, indicating how excited, alert, or active an individual feels. Dominance (D) reflects emotional regulation and the sense of autonomy in a given setting [25], contributing to a three-dimensional model of emotional behavior as depicted in Figure 2. This research examines the aspects of emotional perception, which encompass pleasure (PP), arousal (PA), and dominance (PD). Meanwhile, as summarized by the Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [26], the Chinese version of the PAD scale measures pleasantness in this article through the emotions of ‘interested’, ‘friendly’, ‘happy’, and ‘pleased’. Arousal is quantified based on the emotional states of ‘excited’, ‘relaxed’, and ‘awake’. Dominance is quantified based on the emotional states of ‘in control’, ‘in charge’, ‘in control’, and ‘in control’. Dominance is assessed based on the presence of ‘dominant’, ‘dominating’, and ‘affected’ emotions.

3.2. Perceived Pleasure Factor

3.2.1. Perceived Green Value

‘Perceived green value’ is defined by Patterson and Spreng (1997) [27] as ‘the consumer’s overall assessment of the net benefits of a product or service based on the consumer’s environmental desires, sustainability expectations, and green needs’. Research has shown that when consumers are aware of the environmental features and extra value of a product, it triggers positive emotional responses such as satisfaction and happiness, which may enhance their positive affective experience of the product [28]; in addition, perceived green value can also trigger consumers’ self-identity, as they perceive the purchase of green furniture as environmentally responsible behavior, generating a positive affective experience that further enhances the level of perceived pleasure the degree of perceived pleasure [29]. Meanwhile, previous studies have shown that customers’ perceived green value significantly influences green purchase intention and loyalty [30,31].
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Perceived green value (PGV) and perceived pleasure (PP) are positively correlated.

3.2.2. Green Brand Image

The term ‘green brand image’ refers to a distinct collection of consumer impressions associated with a brand connected to sustainability and environmental concerns [32]. Studies have demonstrated that customers’ positive impressions and trust in environmentally friendly brands can substantially impact their favorable perceptions and emotional attitudes toward the brand, perhaps leading to increased enjoyment [33]. Furthermore, the use of green branding has the potential to evoke emotional resonance in customers, hence intensifying their emotional enjoyment [34]. Moreover, a green brand image has a favorable impact on the selection of eco-friendly brands. This implies that cultivating an ecologically conscious brand identity can significantly influence a company’s standing, while a favorable brand image enhances the probability of consumers selecting environmentally friendly items [35].
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
A green brand image (GBI) and perceived pleasure (PP) are positively correlated.

3.2.3. Aesthetic Design

Aesthetic design refers to the visual appeal and attractiveness of eco-friendly furniture. Several studies have shown that the aesthetic attractiveness of green furniture can increase consumers’ perceived pleasure [36]. The green furniture design is ergonomic, provides comfort, and potentially expands the purchaser’s perceived pleasure during use [37]. Additionally, the design may enhance the purchaser’s perceived pleasure when high-quality materials are selected, offering sensory experiences like tactile sensation and odor [38]. Visual design in website development influences a website’s balance, emotional appeal, and aesthetics using colors, shapes, fonts, and animations, ultimately creating an attractive and enjoyable user experience [39]. Green furniture’s detailed and balanced design affects how consumers perceive its attractiveness and influences their decision to purchase it from a product design perspective. The ambient aesthetics affect consumers’ perceptions of the product [40].
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Aesthetic design (AD) and perceived pleasure (PP) are positively correlated.

3.3. Perceived Arousal Factors

3.3.1. Environmental Awareness

In China, consumers now prioritize “environmental performance” over the “price factor” when buying furniture [41]. Environmental awareness refers to individuals’ consciousness of environmental challenges and their readiness to address them [42]. Pagiaslis and Krontalis (2014) [43] emphasize that consumers’ understanding of the environment has a favorable impact on their likelihood of purchasing eco-friendly items. Environmental awareness can indirectly impact pro-environmental intentions and behaviors through attitudes, subjective standards, and perceived behavioral control [44,45]. Extremely environmentally conscious consumers are more likely to be concerned about ecological issues and, hence, are more likely to recognize the presence of eco-friendly furniture. This awareness increases the probability that they will prefer products with eco-friendly attributes [46].
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
Environmental awareness (EA) and perceptual arousal (PA) are positively correlated.

3.3.2. Eco-Innovation

Eco-innovation plays a crucial role in achieving both environmental and economic advantages. Studies have demonstrated that the adoption and execution of eco-innovations can improve consumers’ favorable opinions of the company, amplify their positive emotions and trust towards the company, and subsequently raise their awareness and interest in environmental matters [47]. Furthermore, adopting eco-innovations can elicit favorable emotions in consumers, such as surprise and excitement, thereby enhancing their consciousness of environmental concerns [48]. Conversely, Sharma et al. (2022) [49] examined the correlation between green purchasing behavior and eco-innovations and the influence of emotion generation and loyalty. Eco-innovation aims to minimize the environmental impact by lowering the ecological footprint. It achieves this by preventing waste and promoting the reuse of trash at the early stages of the production process.
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
Eco-innovation (EI) and perceived arousal (PA) are positively correlated.

3.3.3. Perceived Consumer Effectiveness

Perceived consumer effectiveness, as described by Ellen et al. (1991) [50], refers to how much consumers that believe their actions, such as environmentally friendly shopping, help to address societal issues like pollution. Roberts (1996) [51] defines individuals’ perspectives on environmental matters as “perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE)” to refer to individuals’ perceptions of ecological concerns. Various studies indicate that consumers who believe that they are effective tend to adopt eco-friendly behaviors because they believe that their actions positively affect the environment. This confidence might boost their enthusiasm for eco-friendly products like green furniture [52]. Consumers with a deep trust in their ability to impact change are more inclined to select eco-friendly products, considering this a meaningful environmental action. Increased confidence can boost the inclination to purchase environmentally friendly furniture [53].
Hypothesis 6 (H6).
Perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) and perceived arousal (PA) are positively correlated.

3.4. Perceived Dominance Factors

3.4.1. Green Brand Image

According to research, a positive sense of trust in a green brand increases a consumer’s identification. This leads to users making their own purchasing decisions, growing a sense of autonomy over brand choices [54]. Furthermore, establishing a green brand image can increase consumers’ emotional connection and sense of belonging to the company. This leads to a perceived sense of control when consumers see supporting a green brand as a statement of their commitment to environmental protection [55]. As a result, a green brand image may directly impact customers’ perceived dominance of the brand by influencing their cognitive and emotional responses.
Hypothesis 7 (H7).
A green brand image (GBI) and perceived domination (PD) are positively correlated.

3.4.2. Purchase Customization

Customizing a green furniture purchase allows users to tailor its material, appearance, and color to their preferences and requirements, ensuring that their demands are met. Laminated wood, an eco-friendly material, can be tailored for customized furniture in China. Chen and Sun (2023) [56] used hierarchical analysis and QFD to build a future strategy for wood laminate panels in customized furniture, explicitly focusing on customized kitchen cabinets to suit target users’ desires.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that personalized items provide increased options and authority for consumers to customize eco-friendly furniture to their preferences, perhaps boosting their sense of control during the buying process. Consumers’ perception of increased control can increase confidence in purchase decisions [57]. Furthermore, consumers can enhance their connection with the product by engaging in the customization process. Through hands-on involvement, consumers may feel more dominant over green furniture, believing that their choices and actions impact the ultimate product outcome [58]. Ha and Janda (2014) [59] and Kim and Lee (2020) [60] showed that online customization information could decrease information overload, streamline decision-making, and have a favorable impact on users’ online buying choices. Streamlining the decision-making process can increase consumers’ feeling of control over buying decisions and make them more inclined to purchase.
Hypothesis 8 (H8).
Purchase customization (PC) and perceived dominance (PD) are positively correlated.

3.4.3. Subjective Norms

Subjective norms are the perceived societal influences affecting an individual’s behavior [61]. Higher subjective norms suggest a greater likelihood of engaging in that behavior [62]. Research has shown that individuals can be affected by others’ conduct and societal standards while making purchasing choices, leading to a rise in dominance. Consumers are more inclined to purchase eco-friendly furniture when they perceive societal approval, which boosts their intention to comply with this norm [63].
Hypothesis 9 (H9).
Subjective norms (SN) and perceived dominance (PD) are positively correlated.

3.5. Perceived Pleasure, Arousal, and Dominance Outcomes

A green purchase intention is a deliberate and thoughtful decision describing why a consumer buys a specific product or brand [64]. It also impacts eco-friendly purchasing habits. When individuals experience a PAD emotional state, they are inclined to exhibit proximity behavior in their surroundings. Donovan and Rossiter (1994) [65] found that pleasure impacted the consumer’s likelihood to purchase. Arousal led to a positive tendency to interact with the retail setting and raised the possibility of the consumer repeating the same activity or visiting the same place. Studies indicate that the feeling of control resulting from perceived dominance influences behaviors like purchase intention [66]. Studies have shown a correlation between affective states of pleasure and arousal and the intention to purchase in physical and virtual retail environments [67]. Pleasure and arousal linked to website elements can boost approach behaviors, including purchase intentions, attitudes, and satisfaction [68,69]. The present study indicates that the emotional condition of individuals experiencing PAD emotions when buying green furniture will likely boost their intention to purchase.
Hypothesis 10 (H10).
Perceived pleasure (PP), arousal (PA), dominance (PD) and green Furniture purchase intention (PI) are positively correlated.

3.6. Theoretical Framework

Figure 3 illustrates the theoretical structure of the final study, which examines the influence of emotional perception on the consumer’s inclination to purchase environmentally friendly furniture based on the literature review analysis.

4. Experiments

4.1. Research Methods and Materials

This study investigates the potential users of green furniture purchasing. It places the population for this questionnaire distribution in the Post-1990s, Post-1980s, and Post-1970s groups, as these stages of the population consists of young people who have just begun their careers, those in the early stages of starting new families, and working people who are more environmentally conscious. Data were collected using the questionnaire approach, with a two-part questionnaire serving as this study’s primary data-gathering tool. The first section focused on respondents’ traits, while the second section included questions aimed at measuring the emotional and perceptual aspects influencing green furniture buying intentions. The data were acquired using random sampling, and the questionnaire was completed online. The questionnaires were delivered randomly to 420 persons, and after removing invalid questionnaires, the responses of 412 people were experimentally examined. Thus, the effective questionnaire recovery rate was approximately 98.10 percent.
The questions were set on a five-point Likert scale, and all responses were given on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The detailed questionnaire is shown in Table A1. Items measuring environmental awareness were adapted from Chen and Tung (2014) [45] and Paul et al. (2016) [70]; items measuring eco-innovation were adapted from Yurdakul and Kazan (2020) [71]; items measuring perceived green value were adapted from Chen et al. (2012) [72]; items measuring green brand image were adapted from Bashir et al. (2020) [32]; and items measuring aesthetic design were adapted from Hekkert and Snelders (2003) [22] and Hsieh et al. (2021) [24]. Items for measuring purchase modification were derived from Schreier (2006) [58]. Items evaluating perceived consumer effectiveness were derived from Cho et al. (2013) [73], while those measuring subjective norms were developed by Kim and Han (2010) [62] and Chen and Tung (2014) [45]. Items assessing perceived pleasure, arousal, and dominance were derived from Yang and Kim (2020) [16]. Items assessing green furniture purchase intention were modified by Xu et al. (2020) [21].

4.2. Analytical Method

Validation factor analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed using SmartPLS 3.0 software to determine the validity of the hypotheses. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), which has grown in popularity in recent years due to its ability to handle non-normal data, small sample sizes, and the use of formative indicators. Bootstrap approaches were used to explore the PAD effect’s mediating influence, including measurement and structural models. The measuring model was evaluated using standardized item loadings, internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity [74]. The PLS-SEM statistical model can be used to investigate the associations between latent and explicit (observed) variables [75].

5. Results

5.1. Demographics

Out of all the participants, 50.49 percent were women, while 49.51 percent were men. Most of the population was born after the 1980s, totaling 161 individuals. Regarding educational background, most had university degrees, accounting for 34.7 percent, while 17.23 percent had postgraduate degrees or above. Figure 4 displays the sample characteristics of this investigation. The demographic data elucidate the study’s findings and enhance comprehension of the audience’s characteristics.

5.2. Data Validity Testing

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) sample adequacy measure and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were used to assess the validity of the factor data analysis. Bartlett’s test assesses whether the total correlation matrix is unitary. The KMO test assesses the extent variables share variance [76]. Following the validity analysis, the questionnaire’s Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.987, indicating high validity, as it exceeded 0.7. The p-value was less than 0.001, confirming the questionnaire’s strong validity for the following analysis, as shown in Table 2.

5.3. Measurement Models

A validation factor analysis is conducted to assess the accuracy of the proposed conceptual model. This analysis helps to determine the extent to which the measured variables demonstrate a pattern or can be utilized to evaluate the theory of measurement [77]. Researchers employ a measurement model to articulate latent constructs using indicator variables to formulate causal hypotheses [78]. The internal model is a structural equation modeling (SEM) study component and elucidates the interrelation between the latent variables that constitute the model. The external model elucidates the correlation between the underlying variables and their respective dimensions. The internal model elucidates the relationship between the factors and provides the loading values of the factors, whereas the variables are shown in the external model. Figure 5 illustrates the impact of eight attributes of green furniture on consumers’ inclination to buy green furniture. It also examines how the perception of pleasure, arousal, and dominance affects this readiness to purchase. The picture also displays the factor loadings for each item, which define their respective latent variables. The factor loadings for each variable were uniform, with factor loading values exceeding 0.7, and the questions assessing the underlying characteristics were in line with the theoretical foundations and factor arrangement. The suitability of the measurement model implies that the items are dependable indicators of the proposed structure, allowing for the examination of structural linkages [79].

5.3.1. Reliability Test

Four techniques were employed to assess reliability: composite reliability (CR), rho_A, average variance extraction (AVE), and Cronbach’s α. Hair et al. (2014) [80] state that the dependability value is deemed adequate at 0.7. All components in Table 3 have values above the 0.7 criterion, suggesting strong structural reliability for all variables. Yap et al. (2012) [81] asserted that the mean variance recovered is evidence of convergent validity. Hair et al. (2014) [80] state that an AVE value of 0.5 is acceptable. Higher AVE values indicate the strong credibility of this technique. The average variance extracted (AVE) suggests that the factors in this analysis are over 0.5, demonstrating strong convergent validity.

5.3.2. Distinctive Validity

Discriminant validity was assessed by examining the correlation coefficients between the average variance extracted (AVE) of the latent variable and the other latent variables. Table 4 demonstrates that the AVE root mean squares exceed the correlation coefficients between the latent variables, indicating a robust discriminant validity for the scale. Furthermore, it is evident that there exists a strong link among the variables, and all of them exhibit statistical significance at a 99% confidence level. Figure 6 displays a heat map illustrating the correlation between variables, focusing on the Person correlation. Thus, we can perform a structural equation modeling analysis.

5.3.3. Covariance Test

The variance inflation factor (VIF) values for the formative measures in the model were all below 5, ranging from 1.631 to 2.636 [82]. Thus, multiple covariances are not a concern, as demonstrated in Table 5.

5.4. Structural Models

5.4.1. Model Fit

The normative fit index (NFI) ranges between 0 and 1. A number nearing 1 signifies a more accurate model match. In Table 6, the NFI value exceeds 0.7, which is acceptable. The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) evaluates the average discrepancy between observed and expected correlation matrices. It is part of the ultimate goodness-of-fit index. According to Hu and Bentler (1988) [83], an SRMR value below 0.05 is considered very good, while a value below 0.1 is acceptable. This study’s SRMR index was less than 0.05, indicating a very high absolute goodness of fit.

5.4.2. R2

The R2 value represents the correlation between an endogenous variable and its anticipated latent variable. The coefficient of determination (R2) should exceed 0.3 [80]. The R2 values for PA, PD, PI, and PP in this investigation were all above 0.3, indicating the superior fit of the model, as shown in Table 7.

5.4.3. Q2 and F2

The Stone–Geisser Q2 criteria have also been employed to assess the predictive capacity of the model [84]. We discovered that the Q2 values of PA, PD, PP, and PI for the proposed theoretical framework are 0.516, 0.506, 0.523, and 0.533, respectively, which are greater than 0 and more significant than 0.35, indicating that the model has high predictive relevance. The F2 effect size is a numerical scale that assesses the strength of the association between two variables. Cohen’s F2 is calculated using methods such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression to evaluate effect size, as shown in Table 8. According to this indicator, perceived arousal (PD) and purchase intention (PI) (0.149 = medium effect), eco-innovation (EI) and perceived arousal (PA) (0.145 = medium effect), perceived dominance (PD) and purchase intention (PI) (0.104 = weak effect), green brand image (GBI) and perceived pleasure (PP) (0.094 = weak effect), and subjective norms (SN) and perceived dominance (PD) (0.094 = weak effect) had the most significant impact on emotional perceptions of green furniture purchase.

5.5. Hypothesis Testing Results

Table 9 displays the hypothesis testing findings, including the path coefficient (β), p-value, and confidence interval. The path coefficient indicates the strength of the association between the explanatory and interpreted variables. According to the table, this article confirms the correctness of the hypothesized model. The perceived green value (PGV) (β = 0.308, p < 0.001), a green brand image (GBI) (β = 0.316, p < 0.001), and an attractive design (β = 0.272, p < 0.001) all positively impact perceived enjoyment, supporting hypotheses H1, H2, and H3. Environmental awareness (EA) (β = 0.252, p < 0.001), eco-innovation (EI) (β = 0.416, p < 0.001), and perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) (β = 0.231, p < 0.001) all had a positive effect on perceived arousal, supporting hypotheses H4, H5, and H6. A green brand image (GBI) (β = 0.293, p < 0.001), purchase customization (PC) (β = 0.300, p < 0.001), and subjective norms (SN) (β = 0.298, p < 0.001) all have a positive influence on perceived domination, supporting Hypotheses H7, H8, and H9. Hypothesis H10 is supported by the positive effects of perceived pleasure (β = 0.236, p < 0.001), arousal (β = 0.369, p < 0.001), and dominance (β = 0.303, p < 0.001) on purchase intention for green furniture. Data with 95% confidence intervals support all hypotheses; hence, they are acceptable. This indicates that green furniture and traditional features positively affect consumers’ emotional perceptions. A green brand image (GBI) has the most significant positive effect on perceived pleasure (PP), eco-innovation (EI) has the most significant positive impact on perceived arousal (PA), purchase customization (PC) has the greatest positive effect on perceived dominance (PD), and perceived arousal (PA) has the greatest positive effect on green furniture purchases. Intention (PI) exerts the biggest beneficial influence.
Nine additional indirect effects are also present. Table 9 reveals that the path coefficient for the relationship between EA→PA→PI is 0.093, the coefficient for EI→PA→PI is 0.154, the coefficient for PCE→PA→PI is 0.085, the coefficient for GBI→PD→PI is 0.089, the coefficient for PC→PD→PI is 0.091, the coefficient for SN→PD→PI is 0.090, the coefficient for AD→PP→PI is 0.064, the coefficient for GBI→PP→PI is 0.075, and the coefficient for PGV→PP→PI is 0.073. The PAD three-dimensional emotions significantly mediate the positive effect between the characteristics of green furniture and the intention to purchase green products. Furthermore, EI→PA→PI has the largest mediating effect.

5.6. Comparative Analysis of Green and Traditional Features

To assess the variability of the impact of the green and traditional characteristics of green furniture on the emotional perception of intention to purchase green furniture, the variables EA, EI, GBI, PGV, AD, PC, PCE, SN, PA, PD, and PP were standardized and then analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that the adjusted R2 values for EP and PI were 0.861 and 0.697, respectively. The variance inflation factor (VIF) values ranged from 1.903 to 4.936. The model fit indices, specifically SRMR (0.031) and NFI (0.933), demonstrated good model fit as they were below the threshold of 0.05 and above the standard value of 0.9, respectively. These findings suggest that the model fit was satisfactory, and there were no issues with covariance. The measurement model, path coefficient β, significance p-value, and confidence intervals are displayed in Figure 7 and Table 10. There is a noticeable disparity in how consumers emotionally respond and intend to purchase green furniture compared to standard furniture due to the presence of green characteristics. The impact of green features (GF) on emotional perception (EP) is more pronounced (β = 0.511, p < 0.001) compared to the effect of traditional features (TC) on emotional perception (EP) (β = 0.390, p < 0.001).
Additionally, the mediating effect of GF→EP→PI (β = 0.460, p < 0.001) is stronger than the mediating effect of TC→EP→PI (β = 0.326, p < 0.001). This effect (β = 0.326, p < 0.001) is more pronounced, meaning that the green qualities of green furniture are more likely to evoke emotional responses from customers, subsequently influencing their intention to purchase green furniture. This implies that customers are more inclined to consider green features a significant element in their purchasing choice. Secondly, consumers’ emotional reactions to green features have a more immediate influence on their intention to acquire green furniture, as opposed to traditional characteristics.

5.7. Multi-Cluster Structural Equation Modelling Analysis

This article utilized a multi-cluster structural equation modeling approach, specifically PLS-MGA analysis, to examine variations in the influence of user demographic factors (gender, age, educational background) on the path of the primary effects model. The data were analyzed using SmartPLS 3.0 , and the results for the standardized path coefficients and significance differences are presented in Table 11. Specific demographic parameters have varying impacts on the model. Among the factors considered, the educational background does not impact the model. However, a green brand image (GBI) significantly influences consumers born after the 1970s, compared to those born after the 1990s, who prioritize pleasure. On the other hand, the perceived green value (PGV) has a more substantial impact on consumers born after the 1990s, who experience higher levels of pleasure and are more likely to be influenced in their purchase intention of green furniture. Additionally, females are more susceptible to the features of green furniture and tend to have stronger emotional perceptions than males. Furthermore, females are more likely to be influenced by the features of green furniture than males. Green furniture exhibits certain features, and females are more influenced by the emotional impression of green furniture than males. Potential causes for these phenomena include the following:
  • Individuals born after the 1970s may have a greater inclination to place trust in established brands and regard environmentally friendly furniture brands with greater importance;
  • Furthermore, individuals born after the 1970s may already have a deeply rooted sense of environmental consciousness. Consequently, individuals are more inclined to experience enjoyment and opt for environmentally friendly brands;
  • Individuals born after the 1990s may exhibit a greater emphasis on sustainable principles;
  • Individuals born after the 1990s are more inclined to utilize social media platforms and are susceptible to the impact of environmental issues discussed on these platforms. Exposure to green ideals on social media can significantly impact individuals, increasing their susceptibility to influence and fostering greater interest and satisfaction with green furniture;
  • Women are typically more emotional and focused on emotional experiences, and green furniture may inspire emotional resonance in women through features such as its sustainable philosophy and the aesthetics and style of home décor, making them more likely to desire to buy.

6. Discussion

Furthermore, other scholars have studied the impact of correlated variables on the intention to make environmentally friendly purchases. Klabi and Binzafrah (2022) [22] confirmed a positive relationship between environmental concern and green purchasing intention and between green brand trust and green buying intention. This study confirms that ecological awareness (EA) has a positive impact on the intention to purchase green furniture by increasing arousal level (β = 0.093, p < 0.001). It also confirms that a green brand image (GBI) positively impacts the intention to purchase green furniture by increasing the levels of pleasure and dominance. Le and Quang (2023) [3] argued that subjective norms (SN) do not directly affect the intention to purchase green furniture. Still, this paper verifies that subjective norms (SN) can indirectly influence the intention to purchase green furniture by increasing consumers’ dominance level (β = 0.090, p < 0.001). Additionally, Le and Quang (2023) [3] concluded that perceived consumer effectiveness positively influences attitudes, which in turn affects the intention to purchase green furniture. This paper establishes that perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) has a positive impact on the intention to purchase green furniture by increasing arousal level (β = 0.085, p < 0.001). Zhang et al. (2023) [85] confirmed that the aesthetic design layout of the product detail page influences consumers’ purchase intentions. This study also confirmed that aesthetic design (AD) increases consumers’ desire to purchase by positively impacting the level of perceived enjoyment (β = 0.064, p < 0.001). Consumers’ purchasing of green products is influenced by their perceived functional value of the product [86]. This study confirms that perceived green value (PGV) indirectly affects green furniture purchase intention by increasing consumers’ pleasure levels (β = 0.073, p < 0.001). Moslehpour et al. (2023) [20] also found that eco-innovation positively influences green purchase intention. It was further confirmed that eco-innovation (EI) positively affects the level of perceived arousal, thereby enhancing purchase intention (β = 0.154, p < 0.001). Additionally, this study demonstrates that purchase customization (PC) positively affects the level of perceived dominance, leading to an increase in the purchase intention of green furniture (β = 0.091, p < 0.001).
In addition, several researchers have looked into the mediating impacts of PAD 3D emotions. Hsieh et al. (2021) [14] demonstrated a positive correlation between design aesthetics and entertainment with enjoyment. The implementation of gamification has a positive impact on arousal, dominance, pleasure, and brand loyalty. In their study, Yang and Kim (2020) [16] found that interactive services significantly positively affect the dominance state, further confirming the influence of the pleasure state on the intention to revisit brand websites. Zhou et al. (2022) [87] conducted a study to examine the impact of various page layouts and colors in smart homes for older individuals on perceived usability, specifically in terms of pleasure (P), activation (A), and dominance (D). This paper also performs a mediation analysis. The aesthetic design (AD) of green furniture positively impacts consumers’ intention to purchase by increasing their enjoyment. The visual appeal of green furniture aligns with consumers’ aesthetic preferences, and the design promotes a sense of comfort that leads to both physical and mental pleasure. The perceived green value (PGV) is directly linked to perceived pleasure (PP), enhancing the purchase intention for green furniture through heightened enjoyment. Furthermore, the perceived pleasure also plays a significant role in this regard. Perceived pleasure is not the only factor at play here. The green brand image (GBI) also acts as a mediator. Consumers’ positive perception and trust in green brands significantly enhances their goodwill and pleasure towards the brand. This, in turn, increases their willingness to make a purchase. The mediating factors that contribute to this effect are perceived arousal (PA), which is influenced by environmental awareness (EA), and perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE). Additionally, eco-innovation (EI) plays a role in this process. A higher environmental awareness indicates more vital values toward ecological protection, stimulating the desire to buy green furniture. Therefore, increasing consumers’ perceived efficacy enhances their understanding of environmentally friendly products like green furniture. Additionally, implementing eco-innovation leads to improved emotional resonance and triggers positive emotions in consumers. These factors indirectly contribute to an increased willingness to purchase green furniture. Perceived dominance (PD) is influenced by purchase customization (PC), a green brand image (GBI), and subjective norms (SN). When consumers feel they have more control over the purchasing process, they are more likely to be willing to purchase green furniture. Green brand trust can enhance consumers’ perceived dominance of the product. Additionally, individuals can be influenced by the behaviors of others and social expectations, which can shape their perception of dominance. The behavior of others and social expectations can influence people’s purchasing decisions. These influences are further influenced by the perceived dominance, which indirectly and favorably affects the propensity to acquire green furniture.
Finally, this article investigates the differences between green and traditional features in triggering emotional reactions and influencing purchasing intentions. The findings demonstrate that green furniture’s green features are more capable of eliciting an emotional response from consumers, which influences their intention to acquire green furniture. In furniture design, it is critical to emphasize green design, focus on eco-innovation, develop a green brand link, and form green ideals to elicit consumers’ emotional responses and induce buy intentions.

7. Conclusions

This article examines the disparities in eliciting emotional responses and impacting buying intentions between green and conventional characteristics. The results indicate that the environmentally friendly characteristics of green furniture have a more remarkable ability to evoke an emotional reaction from consumers, which in turn affects their desire to have green furniture. In furniture design, it is crucial to prioritize green design, concentrate on eco-innovation, establish a strong connection with a green brand, and foster green values. This will evoke consumers’ emotional responses and encourage them to make purchase decisions.
(1)
Perceived arousal (PD) and purchase intention (PI) (0.149 = medium effect), eco-innovation (EI) and perceived arousal (PA) (0.145 = medium effect), perceived dominance (PD) and purchase intention (PI) (0.104 = weak effect), a green brand image (GBI) and perceived pleasure (PP) (0.094 = weak effect), through F2 values, and subjective norms (SN) and perceived domination (PD) (0.094 = weak effect), had the greatest impact on the emotional perception of green furniture purchase intent.
(2)
All explanatory variables are significantly related to the explanatory variable (green furniture purchasing intention). Furthermore, all PAD three-dimensional emotions significantly moderated the association between green furniture attributes and purchasing intent.
(3)
Additional examination using multi-group structural equation modeling indicates that the impact of a green brand image (GBI) on the intention to purchase green furniture is more substantial for consumers born after the 1970s than those born after the 1990s. Conversely, the influence of perceived green value (PGV) on the intention to purchase green furniture is more significant for consumers born after the 1990s due to their higher level of pleasure. Furthermore, females are more likely than males to be influenced by the features of green furniture, which elicit emotional perception and generate purchase intention. Simultaneously, women are more prone to being swayed by the attributes of green furniture, which affects their emotional perception and intention to make a purchase.
(4)
This study examined the impact of green features and traditional features of green furniture on consumers’ emotional perception and purchase intention. The findings revealed that green features had a more substantial influence on emotional perception (β = 0.511, p < 0.001) compared to traditional features (β = 0.390, p < 0.001). They exhibited greater strength.
The findings of this study are categorized into theoretical and practical findings. Firstly, it enhances the existing theoretical framework of green furniture purchase intention. Secondly, it demonstrates that eco-innovation (EI), a green brand image (GBI), and purchase customization (PC) have the most significant positive impact on perceived pleasure (PP), arousal (PA), and dominance (PD), respectively. Additionally, green features (GFs) have the greatest influence on emotional perception (EP). All of these factors have a positive and significant influence on purchase intention, which is a distinct focus of previous research. Therefore, this study contributes to the advancement of theoretical knowledge in this field. The practical ramifications of this paper are as follows:
(1)
Enhance the emotional marketing plan: Considering the significant influence of emotional perception on the intention to purchase, green furniture companies should improve their emotional marketing strategy. By utilizing emotional advertising, brand narrative, education, and publicity, we may heighten consumers’ environmental consciousness and self-assurance, reinforcing their emotional attachment and intention to purchase.
(2)
Emphasis on green features and eco-innovation: Research results show that in green furniture marketing, it is crucial to emphasize the product’s green features, followed by eco-innovation, which has the most significant impact on consumers’ perceived pleasure. Therefore, companies should continuously launch products that meet environmental needs and highlight the green features of furniture, such as environmental protection and sustainability, to attract consumers and enhance their pleasure.
(3)
Improving green brand image: The findings indicate that a green brand image has the greatest impact on consumers’ perceived pleasure. As a result, businesses should commit to developing a positive green brand image through brand marketing activities and brand image to improve consumer satisfaction. They should also use branding and marketing methods to encourage consumers to favorably appraise and recognize green furniture while keeping in mind the influence of subjective norms.
(4)
Customized services and distinct experiences: The findings indicate that purchase customization has the biggest impact on perceived dominance. As a result, businesses can match consumer demand for individualized products by offering customized services. In addition, because different gender and age groups have different levels of willingness to buy, in the case of fierce market competition, green furniture enterprises should focus on specific groups of users to achieve differentiated product services.
This study has the following limitations and research deficiencies that can be improved through future research:
  • Due to the use of the questionnaire approach, the data acquired for this study were limited to a cross-sectional perspective. To address this constraint, future analyses should investigate using a longitudinal experimental design;
  • An analysis can be conducted to examine the emotional influence of intentions to make environmentally friendly purchases in various locations;
  • This paper only investigated the impact of green furniture features on consumers’ emotional responses, and the mechanisms explored in the future could be the dual-mediated impacts of the functional and emotional dimensions.

Author Contributions

S.Y. was responsible for funding acquisition and project administration, formulated the overall research objectives, and completed improvements on the first draft. Z.Z. wrote the first draft, developed the design of the research methodology, and completed the data collection portion of the study. Y.Z. provided the materials and venues for the study. J.S. completed the translations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

After consideration by the Institutional Review Board of this institution, the experimental design and protocol of the study were found to be scientifically sound, fair and impartial, and did not cause harm or risk to the subjects, the recruitment of subjects was found to be based on the principle of voluntary and informed consent and protection of the rights and interests of the participants as well as their privacy, and the content of the study was found to be free from conflict of interest as well as violation of moral and ethical principles and legal prohibitions, and it complied with the ethical standards set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board agreed that the work on this project was proceeding as planned.

Informed Consent Statement

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the Joint Research Program of Nanjing Forestry University, Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Furnishings and Industrial Design (Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China), and Major Project to Promote the Implementation of the 14th Five-Year Plan for the Integrated Development of the Yangtze River Delta—Public Service Platform for Social Assistance in the Yangtze River Delta (Project Code: 2201.320000-04-04-685162).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Constructions and their measurements.
Table A1. Constructions and their measurements.
ComponentsItemsSources
Green Feature
(GF)
Environmental Awareness (EA)(EA-01) I am very concerned about the current environmental situation in my country[45,70]
(EA-02) I believe that individuals have a responsibility to protect the environment.
(EA-03) I am willing to control my consumption to protect the environment
Eco-Innovation (EI)(EI-01) I think green furniture is easier to recycle than traditional furniture[71]
(EI-02) I think green furniture reduces the damage caused by waste compared to traditional furniture.
(EI-03) I think green furniture uses less material than traditional furniture.
Perceived Green Value (PGV)(PGV-01) I think green furniture is more valuable to the environment than traditional furniture.[72]
(PGV-02) I think green furniture is more valuable compared to paid currency.
(PGV-03) I hope that green furniture will improve environmental performance.
Green Brand Image (GBI)(GBI-01) I think to implement green practices, green furniture is successful.[32]
(GBI-02) I think that by implementing green practices, green furniture will have a good reputation.
(GBI-03) I think green furniture is in the limelight to implement environmental protection measures.
(GBI-04) Green furniture with good green brand trust appeals to me.
Traditional Characteristics (TC)Aesthetic Design (AD)(AAD-01) I would love visually appealing green furniture.[22,24]
(AAD-02) I like green furniture that has a sense of design and has been professionally designed.
(AAD-03) Furniture with innovative green materials appeals to me!
Purchase Customisation (PC)(PC-01) I like to personalize when buying furniture[58]
(PC-02) I want to buy green furniture with CMF (Colour, Material, Workmanship) at my disposal.
(PC-03) I would buy green furniture that can be customized.
Perceived Consumer Effectiveness (PCE)(PCE-01) I think it’s worth it for individual consumers to try to protect and improve the environment.[73]
(PCE-02) By purchasing green furniture, I believe I can positively impact the environment and society.
(PCE-03) I believe that by greening my consumption, I will influence my living environment.
Subjective norms (SN)(SN-01) People who are important to me think I should buy green furniture.[45,62]
(SN-02) People who influence my behavior think I should buy green furniture.
(SN-03) People whose opinions I value prefer me to use green furniture.
Emotional perception (EP)Perceived Pleasure (PP)(PP-01) Buying furniture with more green values would make me feel very friendly[16]
(PP-02) Buying green furniture with good aesthetic design will make me happy!
(PP-03) I am very interested in green furniture with a good green brand image.
Perceptual Arousal (PA)(PA-01) I’m very conscious of the need to protect the environment by controlling consumption.
(PA-02) Eco-innovation through the purchase of green furniture would excite me!
(PA-03) The efficacy of the positive impact of buying green furniture makes me feel relaxed
Perceptual Domination (PD)(PD-01) Green brand image will have a dominant influence on whether I buy green furniture or not.
(PD-02) I want to buy green furniture that I can customize at my discretion.
(PD-03) Whether or not I buy green furniture can be influenced by others.
Purchase Intention (PI)(PI-01) I’m willing to buy green furniture that gives me pleasure.[11]
(PI-02) I’m willing to buy green furniture that excites me.
(PI-03) I am willing to buy green furniture at my disposal

References

  1. He, Q.; Silliman, B.R. Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R1021–R1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klein Goldewijk, K.; Beusen, A.; Janssen, P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene 2010, 20, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Le Tan, T.; Quang, N.D. Influencing factors on eco-friendly furniture buying behaviour in the city of danang-vietnam. Remit. Rev. 2023, 8, 2074–2097. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu, J.; Niu, J. Green Material Characteristics Appllied to Office Desk Furniture. BioResources 2022, 17, 2228–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiong, X.; Ma, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M. Current situation and key manufacturing considerations of green furniture in China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 121957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parikka-Alhola, K. Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 472–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xie, X.; Zhu, J.; Ding, S.; Chen, J. AHP and GCA Combined Approach to Green Design Evaluation of Kindergarten Furniture. Sustainability 2023, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nekmahmud, M.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blackwell, R.D.; Miniard, P.W.; Engel, J.F. Consumer Behavior, 10th ed., Thomson South-Western: Singapore, 2006.
  10. Van Delft, W.C.J.M. Omnichannel Shopping Behaviour during the Customer Journey. Master’s Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zaharia, S.I. Consumer Behaviour in Multi-Channel-Retailing-How do Consumers Use the Channels of a Multi-Channel-Retailer during the Buying Process; University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of Marketing and Retailing: Duisburg-Essen, Germany, 2005; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  12. Neidenthal, P.M.; Krauth-Gruber, S.; Ric, F. Psychology of Emotion: Interpersonal, Experiential, and Cognitive Approaches; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu, S.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X. Consumer personality traits vs. their preferences for the characteristics of wood furniture products. BioResources 2023, 18, 7443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hsieh, S.H.; Lee, C.T.; Tseng, T.H. Branded app atmospherics: Examining the effect of pleasure–arousal–dominance in brand relationship building. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, Y.; Lee, E.J. Impact of interior colors in retail store atmosphere on consumers’ perceived store luxury, emotions, and preference. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2017, 35, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, K.; Kim, H.J.M.; Zimmerman, J. Emotional branding on fashion brand websites: Harnessing the Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) model. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2020, 24, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C. A study of the emotional impact of interior lighting color in rural bed and breakfast space design. Buildings 2023, 13, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xie, S.; Madni, G.R. Impact of social media on young generation’s green consumption behavior through subjective norms and perceived green value. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Majeed, M.U.; Aslam, S.; Murtaza, S.A.; Attila, S.; Molnár, E. Green marketing approaches and their impact on green purchase intentions: Mediating role of green brand image and consumer beliefs towards the environment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moslehpour, M.; Chau, K.Y.; Du, L.; Qiu, R.; Lin, C.-Y.; Batbayar, B. Predictors of green purchase intention toward eco-innovation and green products: Evidence from Taiwan. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraž. 2023, 36, 2121934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, X.; Hua, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, G. Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 156, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Klabi, F.; Binzafrah, F. The mechanisms for influencing green purchase intention by environmental concern: The roles of self-green image congruence and green brand trust. South Asian J. Manag. 2022, 16, 76–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, C.; Liu, W.; Fei, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, Z. Influencing factors of online furniture purchase behavior based on analytic hierarchy process. BioResources 2023, 18, 2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bran, A.; Vaidis, D.C. On the characteristics of the cognitive dissonance state: Exploration within the pleasure arousal dominance model. Psychol. Belg. 2020, 60, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, M.-X.; Ali, R.; Liao, J.-Y. The Effect of User Experience in Online Games on Word of Mouth: A Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) Model Perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 75, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patterson, P.G.; Spreng, R.A. Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: An empirical examination. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1997, 8, 414–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hur, W.M.; Kim, Y.; Park, K. Assessing the effects of perceived value and satisfaction on customer loyalty: A ‘green’ perspective. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2013, 20, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luchs, M.G.; Mooradian, T.A. Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. J. Consum. Policy 2012, 35, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brady, M.K.; Robertson, C.J. An exploratory study of service value in the USA and Ecuador. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1999, 10, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cronin, J.J.; Brady, M.K.; Brand, R.R.; Hightower, R.; Shemwell, D.J. A cross-sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value. J. Serv. Mark. 1997, 11, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bashir, S.; Khwaja, M.G.; Rashid, Y.; Turi, J.A.; Waheed, T. Green brand benefits and brand outcomes: The mediating role of green brand image. Sage Open 2020, 10, 2158244020953156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delgado-Ballester, E.; Munuera-Alemán, J.L. Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. Eur. J. Mark. 2001, 35, 1238–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saputra, M.H.; Ardyan, E.; Tanesia, C.Y.; Ariningsih, E.P. Building Brand Resonance: Optimizing Symbolic Brand Reputation and Customers’ Emotional Value. ASEAN Mark. J. 2021, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mourad, M.; Serag Eldin Ahmed, Y. Perception of green brand in an emerging innovative market. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2012, 15, 514–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hekkert, P.; Snelders, D.; Van Wieringen, P.C.W. ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br. J. Psychol. 2003, 94, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Norman Donald, A. The Design of Everyday Things; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  38. Desmet, P.; Hekkert, P. Framework of product experience. Int. J. Des. 2007, 1, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cyr, D.; Head, M.; Ivanov, A. Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Creusen, M.E.H.; Veryzer, R.W.; Schoormans, J.P.L. Product value importance and consumer preference for visual complexity and symmetry. Eur. J. Mark. 2010, 44, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiong, X.; Yue, X.; Dong, W.; Xu, Z. Current status and system construction of used-furniture recycling in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 82729–82739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, S.; Fan, J.; Zhao, D.; Yang, S.; Fu, Y. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 2016, 43, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pagiaslis, A.; Krontalis, A.K. Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bamberg, S.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 25, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, M.F.; Tung, P.J. Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 36, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Griskevicius, V.; Tybur, J.M.; Van den Bergh, B. Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stea, D.; Foss, N.J.; Christensen, P.H. Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation. Eur. Manag. J. 2015, 33, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lin, C.-P.; Chen, S.-C.; Chiu, C.-K.; Lee, W.-Y. Understanding purchase intention during product-harm crises: Moderating effects of perceived corporate ability and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharma, N.; Paço, A.; Kautish, P. The impact of eco-innovation on green buying behaviour: The moderating effect of emotional loyalty and generation. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2022, 33, 1026–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ellen, P.S.; Wiener, J.L.; Cobb-Walgren, C. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. J. Public Policy Mark. 1991, 10, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roberts, J.A. Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. J. Busin. Res. 1996, 36, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schultz, P.W.; Nolan, J.M.; Cialdini, R.B.; Goldstein, N.J.; Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tarkiainen, A.; Sundqvist, S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Martínez-Garmendia, J. Application of hedonic price modeling to consumer packaged goods using store scanner data. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pomering, A.; Johnson, L.W. Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2009, 14, 420–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, Y.; Sun, W. R&D Strategy Study of Customized Furniture with Film-Laminated Wood-Based Panels Based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process/Quality Function Deployment Integration Approach. BioResources 2023, 18, 8249–8263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suri, R.; Monroe, K.B. The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. J. Consum. Res. 2003, 30, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schreier, M. The value increment of mass-customized products: An empirical assessment. J. Consum. Behav. 2006, 5, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ha, H.Y.; Janda, S. The effect of customized information on online purchase intentions. Internet Res. 2014, 24, 496–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, H.Y.; Lee, Y. The effect of online customization on consumers’ happiness and purchase intention and the mediating roles of autonomy, competence, and pride of authorship. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, Y.; Han, H. Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel—A modification of the theory of planned behavior. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 997–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cialdini, R.B.; Reno, R.R.; Kallgren, C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 58, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ko, E.; Hwang, Y.K.; Kim, E.Y. Green marketing’ functions in building corporate image in the retail setting. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1709–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Donovan, R.J.; Rossiter, J.R.; Marcoolyn, G.; Nesdale, A. Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior. J. Retail. 1994, 70, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Song, J.; Zahedi, F.M. A theoretical approach to web design in e-commerce: A belief reinforcement model. Manag. Sci. 2005, 51, 1219–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; Davis, L.M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. J. Bus. Res. 2001, 54, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ha, Y.; Lennon, S.J. Effects of site design on consumer emotions: Role of product involvement. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2010, 4, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hsieh, J.K.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Chiu, H.C.; Yang, Y.-R. Customer response to web site atmospherics: Task-relevant cues situational involvement PAD. J. Interact. Mark. 2014, 28, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yurdakul, M.; Kazan, H. Effects of eco-innovation on economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Turkey’s manufacturing companies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cho, Y.-N.; Thyroff, A.; Rapert, M.I.; Park, S.-Y.; Lee, H.J. To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gudarzi, E.; Tajdini, A.; Pourmousa, S.; Latibari, A.J.; Roohnia, M. Structural equation modeling (SEM) of consumer preferences for wooden furniture (home and office). BioResources 2022, 17, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lei, P.W.; Wu, Q. Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 2007, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Siddiqui, M.H.; Sharma, T.G. Analyzing customer satisfaction with service quality in life insurance services. J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 2010, 18, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Babin, B.J.; Hair, J.F.; Boles, J.S. Publishing research in marketing journals using structural equation modeling. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2008, 16, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gerpott, T.J.; Rams, W.; Schindler, A. Customer retention, loyalty, and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecommun. Policy 2001, 25, 249–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xu, J.; Gong, J.; Ji, D. Exploring the determinants of users’ co-creation behavior on music streaming platforms in China. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0291313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hair, J.F.; Gabriel, M.; Patel, V. AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Braz. J. Mark. 2014, 13, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wah Yap, B.; Ramayah, T.; Nushazelin Wan Shahidan, W. Satisfaction and trust on customer loyalty: A PLS approach. Bus. Strategy Ser. 2012, 13, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hair, J.; Hollingsworth, C.L.; Randolph, A.B.; Chong, A.Y.L. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 1998, 3, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Carrión, G.C.; Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Roldán, J.L. Prediction-oriented modeling in business research by means of PLS path modeling: Introduction to a JBR special section. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4545–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, W.; Zhou, C.; Yu, M.; Huang, T.; Kaner, J. Interface design for the mobile terminal for furniture shopping in the post-epidemic era: An empirical evidence of user demand collection. BioResources 2023, 18, 5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhao, L.; Lee, S.H.; Copeland, L.R. Social media and Chinese consumers’ environmentally sustainable apparel purchase intentions. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2019, 31, 855–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhou, C.; Qian, Y.; Huang, T.; Kaner, J.; Zhang, Y. The impact of different age-friendly smart home interface styles on the interaction behavior of elderly users. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 935202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Consumer buying process architecture.
Figure 1. Consumer buying process architecture.
Sustainability 16 04935 g001
Figure 2. PAD 3D emotional model.
Figure 2. PAD 3D emotional model.
Sustainability 16 04935 g002
Figure 3. Theoretical framework.
Figure 3. Theoretical framework.
Sustainability 16 04935 g003
Figure 4. Demographic statistics.
Figure 4. Demographic statistics.
Sustainability 16 04935 g004
Figure 5. Measurement model diagram.
Figure 5. Measurement model diagram.
Sustainability 16 04935 g005
Figure 6. Heat map of correlation.
Figure 6. Heat map of correlation.
Sustainability 16 04935 g006
Figure 7. Measurement models for green and traditional features.
Figure 7. Measurement models for green and traditional features.
Sustainability 16 04935 g007
Table 1. Factors influencing emotional perception (EP).
Table 1. Factors influencing emotional perception (EP).
ItemsIndexes
Green Feature
(GF)
Environmental Awareness (EA)
Eco-Innovation (EI)
Perceived Green Value (PGV)
Green Brand Image (GBI)
Traditional Characteristics
(TC)
Aesthetic Design (AD)
Purchase Customisation (PC)
Perceived Consumer Effectiveness (PCE)
Subjective Norms (SN)
Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test.
Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test.
KMO and Bartlett’s Test
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin metric for sampling adequacy.0.987
Bartlett’s test of sphericityapproximate chi-square (math.)12,726.578
df820
Sig.0.000
Table 3. Reliability analysis.
Table 3. Reliability analysis.
ComponentCronbach’s Alpharho_AComposite ReliabilityAverage Extraction Variance (AVE)
AD0.8070.8070.8860.721
EA0.8750.8760.9230.800
EI0.8830.8840.9280.811
GBI0.8700.8700.9110.719
PA0.8110.8120.8880.726
PC0.8110.8110.8880.725
PCE0.8050.8070.8850.720
PD0.8390.8390.9030.756
PI0.8500.8500.9090.769
PP0.8350.8360.9010.752
PGV0.8900.8900.9310.819
SN0.8070.8070.8860.721
Table 4. Distinctive validity 1.
Table 4. Distinctive validity 1.
ADEAEIGBIPAPCPCEPDPIPPPGVSN
AD0.849
EA0.831 ***0.894
EI0.802 ***0.852 ***0.900
GBI0.802 ***0.814 ***0.817 ***0.848
PA0.757 ***0.794 ***0.817 ***0.767 ***0.852
PC0.785 ***0.800 ***0.802 ***0.794 ***0.776 ***0.852
PCE0.765 ***0.809 ***0.804 ***0.795 ***0.770 ***0.753 ***0.848
PD0.774 ***0.788 ***0.786 ***0.764 ***0.762 ***0.758 ***0.755 ***0.870
PI0.780 ***0.816 ***0.802 ***0.798 ***0.784 ***0.768 ***0.776 ***0.765 ***0.877
PP0.776 ***0.792 ***0.796 ***0.785 ***0.777 ***0.764 ***0.746 ***0.767 ***0.755 ***0.867
PGV0.810 ***0.831 ***0.840 ***0.812 ***0.806 ***0.812 ***0.805 ***0.788 ***0.820 ***0.786 ***0.905
SN0.791 ***0.800 ***0.794 ***0.780 ***0.758 ***0.754 ***0.764 ***0.753 ***0.750 ***0.751 ***0.787 ***0.849
1 *** denotes p < 0.001.
Table 5. Covariance test.
Table 5. Covariance test.
VIF VIF
AD_Row11.840PC_Row11.753
AD_Row21.668PC_Row21.762
AD_Row31.767PC_Row31.798
EA_Row12.397PD_Row12.086
EA_Row22.527PD_Row21.869
EA_Row32.216PD_Row31.993
EI_Row12.300PI_Row12.152
EI_Row22.603PI_Row22.233
EI_Row32.628PI_Row31.903
GBI_Row12.169PP_Row11.949
GBI_Row22.044PP_Row21.966
GBI_Row32.049PP_Row31.914
GBI_Row42.126PGV_Row12.636
PA_Row11.828PGV_Row22.622
PA_Row21.806PGV_Row32.529
PA_Row31.702SN_Row11.805
PCE_Row11.674SN_Row21.631
PCE_Row21.792SN_Row31.871
PCE_Row31.771
Table 6. Model fit.
Table 6. Model fit.
Saturated ModelEstimated Model
SRMR0.0340.053
d_ULS0.8371.957
d_G0.7760.888
chi-square value1835.2881968.952
NFI0.8590.849
Table 7. R2.
Table 7. R2.
R2Adjusted R2
PA0.7180.716
PD0.6760.673
PI0.7000.697
PP0.7020.699
Table 8. F2.
Table 8. F2.
F2
PA→PI0.149
EI→PA0.145
PD→PI0.104
GBI→PP0.094
SN→PD0.094
Table 9. Hypothesis testing results.
Table 9. Hypothesis testing results.
PathPath Factor (β)T-Statistic (|O/STDEV|)p-Value95%CIResults
LLCIULCI
AD→PP0.2725.218<0.0010.1660.373Accept
EA→PA0.2524.294<0.0010.1480.381Accept
EI→PA0.4167.557<0.0010.3050.518Accept
GBI→PD0.2936.424<0.0010.2030.373Accept
GBI→PP0.3166.610<0.0010.2090.404Accept
PA→PI0.3698.054<0.0010.2760.454Accept
PC→PD0.3006.245<0.0010.2020.386Accept
PCE→PA0.2314.389<0.0010.1250.327Accept
PD→PI0.3036.874<0.0010.2090.382Accept
PP→PI0.2365.398<0.0010.1470.316Accept
PGV→PP0.3086.827<0.0010.2160.392Accept
SN→PD0.2986.781<0.0010.2130.385Accept
EA→PA→PI0.0933.632<0.0010.0490.149Accept
EI→PA→PI0.1545.836<0.0010.1020.208Accept
PCE→PA→PI0.0853.706<0.0010.0450.132Accept
GBI→PD→PI0.0894.433<0.0010.0520.131Accept
PC→PD→PI0.0914.596<0.0010.0560.131Accept
SN→PD→PI0.0904.850<0.0010.0600.127Accept
AD→PP→PI0.0643.870<0.0010.0370.103Accept
GBI→PP→PI0.0754.119<0.0010.0420.112Accept
PGV→PP→PI0.0734.056<0.0010.0410.111Accept
Table 10. Multi-cluster structural equation modelling analysis.
Table 10. Multi-cluster structural equation modelling analysis.
PathPath Factor (β)T-Statistic (|O/STDEV|)p-Value95%CIResults
LLCIULCI
EP→PI0.83562.059<0.0010.8050.859Accept
GF→EP0.5519.869<0.0010.4470.673Accept
TC→EP0.3906.966<0.0010.2700.497Accept
GF→EP→PI0.4609.634<0.0010.3740.563Accept
TC→EP→PI0.3266.938<0.0010.2250.415Accept
Table 11. Multi-cluster structural equation modelling analysis 2.
Table 11. Multi-cluster structural equation modelling analysis 2.
DemographicsGBI→PPPGV→PPEP→PI
GenderMale0.3290.3810.807 *
Female0.2990.2300.861 *
Age group by birth1990s0.197 *0.407 **0.822
1980s0.2770.387 **0.859
1970s0.509 *0.064 **0.823
Educational backgroundLow0.2630.2820.844
High0.3790.3100.826
2 * denotes p < 0.05, ** denotes p < 0.01; low education attainment is defined as less than specialized, and high education attainment is defined as specialized and above.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, S.; Zhong, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, J. Green Emotion: Incorporating Emotional Perception in Green Marketing to Increase Green Furniture Purchase Intentions. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124935

AMA Style

Yu S, Zhong Z, Zhu Y, Sun J. Green Emotion: Incorporating Emotional Perception in Green Marketing to Increase Green Furniture Purchase Intentions. Sustainability. 2024; 16(12):4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124935

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Shulan, Zhen Zhong, Yalin Zhu, and Jing Sun. 2024. "Green Emotion: Incorporating Emotional Perception in Green Marketing to Increase Green Furniture Purchase Intentions" Sustainability 16, no. 12: 4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop