Next Article in Journal
Study on the Resilience Measurement of the New Energy Vehicle Industry Chain
Previous Article in Journal
Contributing to Carbon Neutrality Targets: A Scenario Simulation and Pattern Optimization of Land Use in Shandong Province Based on the PLUS Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on the Educational Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Suitability, Spatial Pattern, and Obstacle Factor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Non-Linear and Synergistic Effects of Street Environment on the Spirit of Place in Historic Districts: Using Multi-Source Data and XGBoost

1
School of Architecture and Art, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
2
School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 5182; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125182
Submission received: 21 May 2024 / Revised: 15 June 2024 / Accepted: 17 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Heritage Tourism)

Abstract

:
The fragmented remodeling of historic districts undermines the spirit of place. Understanding the intricate relationship between the neighborhood environment and the spirit of place is essential for sustainable urban development. Current research predominantly relies on case studies and the concept of place, which are subjective and lack specific analysis of how the neighborhood environment shapes the spirit of place. In this study, we examine Chuancheng Street in Handan City as a case study. Utilizing the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model and multi-source data, combined with SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), we analyze the non-linear and synergistic effects of the street environment on the spirit of place in historic districts. The findings reveal that (1) the proportion of enduring sociability (PES) on the street significantly shapes the spirit of place, with cultural space elements being less prioritized in perception; (2) PES, green vision index (GVI), Integration_800 m, and mixed land use (MLU) have pronounced non-linear impacts on the spirit of place, with strong threshold effects, and these factors also demonstrate a synergistic effect; (3) There are notable spatial variations in the spirit of place across different blocks, particularly influenced by the authenticity of cultural heritage. This study provides fundamental insights into the spirit of place in historic neighborhoods, enabling a better understanding of complex urban dynamics and informing future street regeneration from a place perspective.

1. Introduction

Places are “things that exist” made visible through their connection to human experience. The character of the environment, place, is then determined by these objects when objects with material essence, form, texture and color form a whole [1]. Spatial places are embodied when space is visualized, symbolized and assembled, bringing the environment together. The concept of place arises from the dynamic interaction between life, physical space, people, and creative expression [2]. According to Norberg-Schulz, places are a fusion of people and sites, essentially being the locations where human interactions occur [1]. The spirit of place, rooted in the ancient Roman belief in a unique “guardian spirit” for each being, imbues people and places with identity and essence. The spirit of place is expressed by the clarity of location, spatial form and identity [1]. Vitruvius understood the spirit of place through a sense of direction and identity. The spirit of place is an “intrinsic” value of a particular area [2]. The sense of place is crucial in fostering the spirit of place [3,4]. Indeed, the spirit of place in the streets plays an essential role in shaping the city’s image and citizens’ collective memory [5].
Many cities in China have a history spanning two to three thousand years, with historical and cultural neighborhoods serving as vital components of their cultural heritage and public spaces. These areas encapsulate the city’s cultural memory, showcase regional characteristics [6,7], and foster sustainable development while enhancing residents’ perception of their city and sense of place [8]. However, rapid urbanization has led to homogenization, threatening the sustainability of these neighborhoods and eroding their unique features [9]. As streets grow more generic, people’s attachment to their environments and Indigenous identity wanes [10], with the fragmented transformation of urban spaces severing emotional connections to the historical and cultural heritage. Streets emerged with the formation of cities, providing access and serving as places for social interaction [11], fostering a sense of belonging and community [12]. Streets are the carrier for urban residents to perceive the city and feel urban life [13], an essential urban linear open space. The way residents interact and behave is influenced to some extent by the spirit of the street place [14,15]. The sense of place is instrumental in the successful renewal of historic districts [16]. Therefore, assessing citizens’ perceptions of the spirit of street places is a crucial step in urban spatial renewal remodeling and cultural regeneration.
Early research on the relationship between street place perception and environment relied on traditional questionnaires, cognitive experiments and interviews to obtain relevant data [17,18]. The cognitive experimental method merges the fuzzy study of geographical elements with psychology, using questionnaires and other tools to explore subjects’ cognition and understanding of geographical concepts or regional boundaries [19,20,21,22]. Liu et al. used cognitive experiments combined with support vector regression to study the spatial distribution of fuzzy features [23]. Although cognitive experiments can directly reflect the spatial perceptions of the general public, the problems of high time costs, small coverage and small sample sizes have made place perception research possible only for individual places [24]. Recently, the utilization of geospatial big data and data mining techniques to enhance the semantic attributes of places has emerged as a significant research direction in geographic information science [24]. Purves et al. have shown that the concept of place aligns with existing concepts of spatial information, and that geographic information about places can be expressed in a GIS when the concept of spatial information is componentially developed and combined [25]. Different types of geospatial big data offer socially aware methods for the quantitative analysis of specific populations and places [26]. Dodds utilizes Twitter media data with cognitive and emotional information about individuals to construct semantics and emotional association with different locations at a collective level [27]. On the other hand, crowdsourced mapping services and geotagged imagery offer a wealth of visual information that provides street scenes from a human perspective, which allows for the large-scale quantification of public perceptions of street scenes and places across various scales [28,29]. As artificial intelligence advances rapidly, deep learning applications in urban perception and planning have proven their great potential by several experimental studies [30,31,32]. For instance, Zhang et al. employed deep learning to measure and evaluate urban perception based on the Place Pulse perceptual evaluation crowdsourced dataset [33].
However, research perspectives on urban perception measures have focused on social, cultural, economic and environmental aspects [34,35,36,37,38,39], overlooking the influence of behavioral interactions between people and places on place perception [40,41,42], as well as the impact of various crowd activities on the assessment of urban scenes [43]. Only a few previous studies have employed qualitative methods to explore the spiritual perceptions of urban places, and there has been a lack of quantitative analysis on the spiritual perceptions of street places in relation to the street environment, without considering the city as a place.
In modeling choices, linear models have been widely used, such as ordinary least squares [44]. In addition, logistic regression models have been applied to assess the relationship between residential satisfaction and place attachment [45]. However, these models are limited by their assumption of linear relationships, often missing potential nonlinear relationships and critical impact thresholds. In addition, several studies have demonstrated that machine learning methods have achieved good results in assessing human emotions [42,46] and are capable of capturing nonlinear and synergistic effects. Advances in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), such as the XGBoost model, now offer interpretability beyond the “black box” stereotype.
Contemporary XAI methods encompass transparent machine learning (ML) models and advanced post hoc interpretation techniques such as SHAP, PDP and Locally Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME). These techniques are widely used in various fields of urban research [47]. Wang developed a reliable urban inundation depth prediction model using XGBoost, enhanced by SHAP and PDP algorithms to analyze the nonlinear effects of city features on flooding and optimize prediction intervals [48]. Kim integrated the RF model with SHAP to estimate heat-related mortality, achieving high-resolution spatial accuracy and improved model interpretation [49]. Zhang created a transparent and interpretable crime prediction model using XGBoost and SHAP [50]. The key to machine learning technology is model explainability. Post hoc techniques, which are model-independent, are primarily used to interpret “black box” models. SHAP, based on game theory, provides explanations for ML model outcomes from both global and local perspectives by evaluating each input feature’s contribution [49,50,51,52]. This technique not only highlights feature importance and interactions but also identifies significant nonlinear effects between independent and dependent variables [53]. SHAP also provides clarity in modeling outcomes and excels in illustrating non-spatial effects [54]. This approach opens a valuable new window for delving into the mechanisms behind the spiritual perception of place. Therefore, in this study, we utilized multi-source data to investigate the spirit of street places in the Chuancheng Street area of Handan City. We developed a comprehensive framework to elucidate the spirit of place perception, focusing on three primary research questions: (1) How can we measure the human perception of the spirit of place in historic districts using streetscape data? (2) How do input variables of the neighborhood spatial environment contribute to the perception of the spirit of place, as investigated using the XGBoost-SHAP technique? (3) Do different administrative subdivisions impact the spirit of place perception? To address these, we initially assessed the study area’s fundamentals and data processing. Next, we introduced the Random Forest ML to measure the spirit of place and analyzed its spatial distribution. Ultimately, we analyzed and explored the non-linear and synergistic effects of the street environment on the spirit of place.

2. Study Area and Dataset

2.1. Study Area

Handan, abbreviated as “Han”, is a prefecture-level city in southern Hebei Province, located between longitudes 114°03′ E and 114°40′ E and latitudes 36°20′ N and 36°44′ N. It is located in the North China Plain, bordered by the Taihang Mountains to the west, and functions as the economic hub for the region that includes the provinces of Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong, and Henan. Handan is a celebrated national historical and cultural city [55]. By the end of 2022, the city comprised six districts, 11 counties and one county-level city, covering a total area of 12,066 square kilometers and housing a population of approximately 9,281,000 [56].
This study area is the Handan Chuancheng Street Historical and Cultural Block Area, located in the densely populated old city of Handan. As shown in Figure 1, the area encompasses eight blocks: West Lianfang, Sijiqing, West Congtai, East Congtai, Heping, Zhonghua, Huomo and Lingyuan Road. The core area is bounded by Lingxi Street to the west, Renmin Road to the north, East Chengnei Street to the east and Chengnan Street to the south. Primarily serving cultural recreation and commercial residence, the block exudes a robust humanistic and residential ambiance across its approximate area of 4.096 km2. Abundant Baidu Street View Imagines (BSVIs) data in the study area enhance the accuracy of the research findings [57].

2.2. Data Source and Processing

Multi-source data were collected to assess the spirit of place in the Chuancheng Street Block Area. The underlying data included the road network, Points of Interest (POI), street imagery, cultural and behavioral data. All of these data were collected for 2023. (1) The urban road network data were obtained from the BaiduMaps platform (https://map.baidu.com/, accessed on 12 November 2023). (2) The POI data were obtained from the Amap online map service platform (https://www.amap.com/, accessed on 6 October 2023). The POI data were analyzed and filtered to contain nine first categories. (3) The streetscape data were collected from BaiduMaps open platform (https://lbsyun.baidu.com/, accessed on 9 August 2023), BSVIs data included collection time and orientation. (4) The cultural and behavioral data were collected from field research, with cultural data supplemented by street view images and satellite imagery maps. In addition, the historical elements data of Chuancheng Street were derived from the “Handan Famous Historical and Cultural City Protection Plan (2020–2035) Exposure Draft” [58]. After acquiring the above data, the data were cleaned and filtered. The data name, data source, number of records and time of acquisition are shown in Table 1.

3. Methods

3.1. Workflow

Figure 2 shows the workflow of the entire analytical process, which includes the following steps: (1) Collecting multi-source data—road network, POI, streetscape, cultural, and behavioral—for streets as the unit of analysis. (2) Establishing an index system for assessing the spirit of street places in historical and cultural blocks using four indicators: behavioral categories, convenience, city culture, and spatial features. (3) Employing the XGBoost model to investigate the non-linear and synergistic relationship, with SHAP and PDP techniques for model interpretation. (4) Examining the impact of key features and cultural heritage authenticity on the spiritual perception of street places.

3.2. Street Generation

This study uses the living street as the basic unit of analysis. Living streets, characterized by activities that draw people to linger and engage, such as local interactions, daily commerce, leisure, and public performances, are selected as the focus due to their high usage and diverse social behaviors. The process for identifying living streets is as follows:
Firstly, the highest precision road network data of the Baidu map is captured by Baiducapture_1.2 V, and the roads are topologized and interrupted at intersections. Secondly, we analyze the interrelationships and mechanisms of social behavior and place perception in the street over 12 h, from 8:00 to 20:00, on both weekdays and weekends. Meanwhile, we utilize a method that filters street features by the weight of POI types [59]. Finally, by combining user activities with the occupation and use of space, we identify 38 streets or segments that have been consistently popular in residential neighborhoods, categorizing them as living streets. Some actual environmental photos of the area and characters are shown in Figure 3.

3.3. Index System Construction

Building upon previous research [43,60], four indicators and 17 variables covering three dimensions (i.e., physical space elements, cultural space elements and human behavioral elements) were defined to assess the spiritual perception of street places. The details and data sources of these indicators are provided in Table 2.

3.3.1. Spatial Features

Street spatial features, including nine variables (i.e., GVI, SVI, SEI, etc.), were quantified using street view image data collection and semantic segmentation technology tools. The study measured the street’s built environment by collecting street view images through the Baidu map open platform (https://lbsyun.baidu.com/, accessed on 9 August 2023). To be more refined to measure the level of residents’ perception in the historical block area of Handan Chuancheng Street, the following steps were taken: (1) Street navigation tracks were obtained using Baiducapture_1.2 V, spatially corrected and geographically aligned to simplify them and extract road centerlines; (2) Sampling points were generated with 30–35 m intervals, corresponding to unique latitude and longitude coordinates in ArcGIS 10.5, resulting in 391 points, due to the richness of the streetscape that can be obtained at road intersections, and combined with citizens’ behavior; (3) A Python script accessed APIs to acquire street view images with adjusted parameters. To be able to simulate the field of view of pedestrians more accurately, this paper refers to Walker et al.’s findings [61], i.e., a person’s field of view, which can be almost 90° to the left and right, can see about 50° upwards and about 75° downwards. And when walking with the head lowered by 10°, one can see 85°. In addition to acquiring images from 4 directions, east, west, south and north, we added two angles (i.e., pitch 45° and pitch −45°) in each direction, twelve images were captured at each point from four directions (east, west, south, north) and two additional angles (45° and −45° pitch), resulting in 5090 BSVIs, each 1024 × 512 pixels, due to missing street views at some points. An example of a BSVI is shown in Figure 4, with an acquisition date of July 2023 for the area.
Building a deep learning network for semantic segmentation of street view images involves leveraging datasets like ADE-20K, which offers more categories and data compared to Cityscapes. This extensive data aids in studying the relationship between residential place perception and visual elements [57], enhancing our understanding of urban environment semantics [62]. Despite the emergence of recent architectures, DeepLab-V3 remains a widely used algorithm for semantic segmentation in urban research, delivering reliable performance. DeepLab-V3 employs techniques like null convolution and multi-scale pyramid pooling, incorporating a module for segmenting objects at multiple scales. It also uses serial and parallel null convolution modules with various atrous rates to capture multi-scale content information, enhancing image segmentation accuracy while preserving high resolution. Moreover, DeepLab-V3, based on a robust pre-trained network like ResNet101, excels in adapting to new tasks and datasets through transfer learning [63]. Therefore, we utilized the deep learning toolkit GluonCV (version number is 0.10.5.post0), based on MXNet, with the DeepLab-V3 algorithm, which is trained on the ADE-20K dataset. This semantic segmentation model can accurately identify and segment 150 categories of common objects, such as roads, sky, plants and buildings. Table 3 shows the details of the semantic segmentation framework.

3.3.2. Measuring Street Accessibility

Street accessibility is characterized by three indicators: the NACH, INT and MLU. For one thing, we use space syntax segment map modeling, the scope of which includes all streets within Handan’s north, south, west and east ring roads. Meanwhile, Baiducapture_1.2 V was utilized to extract the most precise road centerline from Baidu Maps. Finally, the modeling process was finalized through manual adjustments based on streetscape and satellite maps.
For the different parameters, regarding the spatial behavior implied by the algorithm, Integration and Choice reflect the potential of street segments as movement destinations and corridors, respectively. NACH is used to minimize the impact of line segment count on the analysis, facilitating comparisons across spatial systems of varying scales and complexity.
In a typical space syntax analysis, the actual flow data is used to fit the analysis, and the optimal scale is determined by testing various analysis radii. The POI data were dropped onto the road at the appropriate location using ArcGIS10.5, and then the space syntax segment map model was verified. Finally, POI data was homogenized using a combined reachable (distance attenuation) and visible (angle attenuation) approach [64]. This paper employs processed POI data from the Chuancheng Street area as the dependent variable, with Choice, INT, NACH, and Normalized Angular Integration as the independent variables. We tested multiple accessible range radii (400 m, 500 m, 600 m, 800 m, 1000 m, 1200 m, 1500 m, 1600 m, 2400 m, and 3200 m) to identify the best fit. The optimal radii for Integration and NACH were found to be 800 m, with R2 values of 52.3% and 53.4%, respectively.
For another thing, using a Python script, we fetched 7023 latest raw Amap POI data, then filtered out those located away from streets (e.g., neighborhoods, campuses, etc.). POIs were categorized into nine main types: restaurants, shopping, health care services, sports and leisure services, municipal services, educational and cultural services, financial and insurance services, accommodation services, and scenic spots. After categorization, 6690 valid POI data were processed in ArcGIS10.5.
The city’s diversity is reflected in the variety of buildings in its blocks, as Jacobs noted [65]. In this paper, MLU is represented by the spatial entropy of POI (i.e., Shannon–Weaver Diversity). A higher entropy value indicates a higher level of street MLU, and this representation does not imply the reverse. The definition of mixed land use is as follows:
M i x U s e d k = i = 1 M p k i ln p k i ln M
where, M i x U s e d k is the mixed land use, p k i refers to the percent of i -th type within unit k of POI or mixed land use, M represents the total number of categories in the current space unit.

3.3.3. Cultural Spatial Cognition

Architectural and historical landmarks enhance local residents’ sense of security and promote social identity [66]. Culture is shaped by the interaction between people and places. How people adapt to and use a particular geographic environment results in particular cultural forms that affect places in a specific environment. And as the geographical environment is regional, culture is bound to take on a local flavor. Geographical variations in climate and resources influence building materials and styles, the architectural style that reflects the regional characteristics becomes the expression of the texture elements of the regional architectural culture [67], these architectural expressions record historical periods and contribute to the continuity of cultural heritage [68]. The city’s history and memory are encapsulated in important buildings, sculptures, old trees and urban public spaces [69]; cultural memory in historic cities contributes to a sense of place identity and place [8]. Linking urban cultural memory to place identity fosters a sense of belonging and identity [70].
Therefore, architectural style and historical memory were used to characterize the elements of the cultural space in the Chuancheng Street area. We integrated field observations with relevant data from the Handan Cultural Relics Protection Department. Then, we utilized street and satellite image maps for calibration and spatial recording. Mapping cultural perceptions: first involved establishing a 50 m buffer zone around each sampling point with ArcGIS10.5, then counting the categories and numbers of elements within the buffer, and finally, employing kernel density analysis for visualization.

3.3.4. Street Behavior Observation

Livable streets are characterized by a variety of behavioral activities that foster community bonds and identity among locals [71]. These activities, along with diverse human interactions, contribute to a stronger sense of direction and identity with street places [72,73]. This will promote the public’s perception of the spiritual perception of place. The richness of street scenes arises from the presence of people with different habits. The longer a pedestrian travels and stays in a street space, the more nuanced their perception of street quality becomes [74]. Mehta suggests that the characteristics of the street environment, such as land use, physical space, and community management, influence users’ perception and willingness to engage in social activities [75,76,77]. This paper adopts Mehta’s typology of social behaviors and a non-participant observation method to record street space behaviors, which are classified into passive and active sociability, with active sociability further divided into fleeting and enduring sociability (Table 4).
This study used non-participant observation to document social behaviors in the vicinity of a living street. The area was divided into five sections, with team members alternating responsibility for each section. From late June 2023, during clear weather, our team selected four recording days (weekdays and weekends) between 7:00–19:00, with two-hour observation cycles, totaling six cycles. We walked the street, capturing latitude and longitude with photo software and photographing various behaviors. After eliminating images that did not meet the study criteria, we counted individuals and locations, described behaviors, and compiled 3387 photos.

3.4. Scoring the Spirit of Street Place Using an Interpretable Urban Perception Model

We refer to the human-machine adversarial scoring method to predict perception [78], which is based on street view images, employing deep learning techniques and iterative feedback mechanisms during human-machine interaction scoring, aiming to quickly and efficiently assess urban perception in a given area. This study constructs a deep learning network based on the Deeplab-V3 image semantic segmentation model and the Random Forest model. To identify visual elements in street scene images that impact residents’ perception of street places, the Deeplab-V3 is used for semantic segmentation to obtain the proportion of visual elements, which is then integrated into the 150-dimensional feature vector scoring framework of Random Forest for street scene elements. The process is shown in Figure 5.
Thirty volunteers, including 10 students (majoring in Urban and Rural Planning subject) and 20 residents with an average age of 39 and a gender ratio of 1:1, were recruited to assess street place perception. Volunteers were first exposed to street view images to form initial perceptions. They then scored the spiritual dimensions of street place perception—identity and orientation—using the scoring model, ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger perceptions. Each volunteer scored the first 300 street scenes in each dimension subjectively. The Random Forest module then correlated the visual elements of the street scenes with the volunteer scores, and the model automatically provided a recommended score. These scores were normalized and summed to produce a composite perception score. As follows:
P t o t a l i = 1 2 ( P i d e n t f i c a t i o n i + P o r i e n t a t i o n i )   ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , 5090 )
where P t o t a l i is the composite perception score for image i , P i d e n t f i c a t i o n i refers to perception score for the identity perception dimension of image i , P o r i e n t a t i o n i represents perception score for the orientation perception dimension of image i .

3.5. XGBoost Algorithm and Interpretable Machine Learning

XGBoost, an optimized distributed gradient boosting system, is widely used across various domains [79]. It incorporates second-order Taylor expansion for error minimization, and employs L1 and L2 regularization to enhance generalization and prevent overfitting [80]. Its interpretability and accuracy have made it a preferred choice in many studies, and the specific details of its use will not be described here. For this study, we use model-agnostic post-hoc techniques to train XGBoost models and generate predictions, which can then be interpreted through global and local interpretation methods. Global interpretation methods average the relationship across all observations.
SHAP is derived from the Shapley value in game theory, and global interpretability demonstrates whether each feature contributes positively to the model predictions or not, the SHAP method also allows for local analyses that focus on interpreting individual sample predictions [81]. SHAP crystallizes the explanation as [82]:
g z = ϕ 0 + i = 1 M ϕ i z i
where the g is the explanation model, z i { 0 , 1 } M is the coalition vector, M represents the maximum coalition size, ϕ 0 is the base value, and ϕ i is the feature attribution for a feature i , Shapley value.
The SHAP value is calculated as follows [82]:
ϕ i = S F i S ! F S 1 ! F ! f S i x S i f S x S
where f is the prediction/estimation model, F is the set of all features, and S is the set of all features excluding i .
In this study, the interpretable machine learning component consists of three subcomponents: multi-class feature importance plots, SHAP summary plots, and SHAP dependence plots. Firstly, the multi-class feature importance plot elucidates model decisions by showing conditional interactions between dependent and independent features across the dataset and ranks the importance of explanatory variables. Secondly, the SHAP summary plot enhances interpretability by visualizing the impact and direction of feature contributions to different perceptions of the spirit of place, with colors representing feature values (red for high, blue for low) and the X-axis showing their effect on perceptions. One-way PDP depicts the marginal effects of input features on model predictions and their interactions (e.g., linear, nonlinear) [54], while two-way SHAP PDP illustrates interaction effects between explanatory variables. PDP explains as follows:
f ^ S x s = E X C = f ^ x s , X C f ^ x s , X C d P X C
where x s are one or two features, X C is the remaining features, f ^ is the model we utilized in this study.

4. Results

4.1. Perception Scores and Key Dimensional Features

Figure 6 illustrates the eight main dimensional features (i.e., signboard, sky, building, person, sidewalk, road, tree, and car.) obtained through the street place perception scoring process in Section 3.4, following semantic segmentation of five streetscape samples with varying scoring levels. The figure also presents three types of perception scores. There is a connection between the perceptual scores of Baidu Street View images with different features and the semantically segmented dimensional features. The perception scores revealed that 5.62% of the streets had a place spirit perception score of 4 or above, 42.46% scored between 2.5 and 4, and 51.92% scored below 2.5. The average score was 2.623, with a standard deviation of 0.718. These results indicate that the overall place perception of the Chuancheng Street area in Handan City is average.
Image A, positioned at the junction of Congtai Road and North Zhonghua Street beside Congtai Park, receives a low score for place perception. The area features a green setting on either side, enhancing directionality for respondents. However, the high traffic volume diminishes the sense of identity, making it less pedestrian-friendly and inhibiting street-side interactions. Image B, situated at the entrance plaza of the park, achieves a higher score for place perception. This is attributed to a notable building with a grand and windy design, imbued with a strong humanistic character, which enriches the pedestrian experience. The presence of clear markers contributes to a better sense of direction. Image C, with a lesser amount of greenery, still scores well due to its excellent accessibility and the retention of a vibrant urban atmosphere. The numerous urban elements give the space a strong sense of identity, leading to a high score for spiritual perception of place. Image D, with an underwhelming score for place perception, is perceived as lacking in identity by respondents. Despite having adequate pedestrian space, the area feels less experiential due to the imposing presence of tall buildings and a lack of activity. Image E receives the lowest score, with respondents perceiving it as having a poor orientation and identity. This could be linked to its architectural composition, characterized by numerous monolithic elements, and the absence of human activity, which may be affecting its overall perception.

4.2. Spatial Distribution Patterns of the Street Environment in the Historic District Area

4.2.1. Spatial Distribution Patterns of Street Environment Indicators

In this paper, six important indicators are selected to describe the GVI, SEI, MLU, INT, PAS, and PES, as shown in Figure 7.
Higher GVI is found on major urban thoroughfares and near waterways, particularly in Congtai Square, North Zhonghua Street and Xuebuqiao Park, while GVI is low on rapid transit routes and residential streets (Figure 7a). SEI values are largely inverse to GVI, with high-intensity development areas having higher SEI scores in core amenity blocks and Chuancheng Street, while main roads show lower SEI (Figure 7b). Many diverse activity facilities exist in the heart of the city or commercial areas. The high functional mixed degree is reflected near main road intersections and the commercial center in front of Handan Railway Station (Figure 7c). High accessibility to the core area of the Chuancheng Street Block is mainly due to the high density of the built-up and the high density of the road network. Especially reflected in the main development roads of the city as well as in the amenity blocks, the INT tends to be low in internal alleyways (Figure 7d). The remaining cultural relics protection units and historical buildings show the historical style of Handan very well. Hence, the architectural style of these places, such as Chuancheng Street, Huiche Lane, North and South Xie Street and the Exhibition Hall Building Complex, is better. In the area of landscape coordination, the further away from the core area, the weaker the architectural landscape will be (Figure 7e). Recreational and commercial areas tend to attract people, such as streets with a strong sense of life, like Dongfeng Street and Lingyuan Road, and recreational regions, like Congtai Square and Museum Square (Figure 7f). Citizens prefer quieter, traffic-free places where some kind of active interaction is ongoing, such as Xuebuqiao Park, Cultural Palace Square Park, Guyunyuan Park and the night market.
Figure 8 depicts the distribution of civic social behaviors observed at streetscape points in the study area. Enduring sociability is the most prevalent, followed by fleeting sociability, with passive sociability being the least frequent across all ranges. Enduring sociability is consistently observed at almost every point. These interactions foster a sense of inclusion and belonging among individuals when they feel accepted and have positive relationships with group members [83].

4.2.2. Spatial Distribution Patterns of Block Place Comprehensive Perception

The street points and their perceptual scores were spatially connected to the street by interpolation, then segmented into five intervals using the Natural Breaks to visualize the spatial distribution features on the map, as shown in Figure 9. The Zhonghua Block and Lingyuan Road Block exhibit higher place perception, especially North Zhonghua Street. The West Congtai Block also demonstrates active place perception. In contrast, the Hepin Block and Huomo Block have lower place perception, mainly because of their proximity to the railway station, with a high transient population and degree of commercialization, leading to a lack of stability in the sense of community and human atmosphere. Inadequate public space and trees contribute to the area’s lack of a good living atmosphere. Furthermore, the higher perceived spiritual value of street places is found in street parks, civic squares, City God’s Temple, schools, and food markets, where people tend to gather and interact, even in the case of the City God’s Temple, which is not solely used for religious purposes.

4.3. Model Effect Analysis

4.3.1. Model Evaluation

Since the rating data is discrete, we transformed it into a three-category problem for ease of analysis. Category 0: poorer spiritual perception of place; Category 1: average spiritual perception of place; and Category 2: better spiritual perception of place. To address data imbalance, we employed the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) oversampling before model fitting. Figure 10 illustrates the model evaluation before and after the tuning. Without adjusting XGBoost model parameters, the prediction accuracy and F1 score using the oversampled test data set are 79.35% and 79.08% respectively. With the Random Search method, the XGBoost model achieved the accuracy and F1 score of 93.70% and 93.58% respectively. Based on the normalized confusion matrix, we can find that the XGBoost model with the Random Search method has the best prediction.

4.3.2. Feature Importance

Figure 11 shows the characteristic importance of significant variables in the entire sample and their descending ranking in explaining the level of spiritual perception of place. The XGBoost model results were used to calculate the mean absolute SHAP values for each variable, representing the independent variables’ contribution to perceived place spirituality. Variables with higher mean SHAP values have a stronger influence. Social behavior types, such as the PES, significantly affect the dependent variable. For street physical space elements such as GVI and SEI—in addition to INT and NACH, which reflect accessibility to traffic—these largely influence the rating of spiritual perception of places. However, the influence of cultural spatial elements was relatively low.
Figure 12 illustrates the ranking of main explanatory variables by their importance in the three levels of spiritual perception of place, with their importance decreasing from top to bottom. The scatterplot displays all training data points, colored from blue to red based on the variable’s value, with the horizontal position indicating whether the variable’s impact is positively or negatively associated with the prediction. Streets with lower PES, GVI and INT tend to have poorer spiritual perception of place, as shown in Figure 12a. However, there are general indices of the proportion of various social behaviors, GVI, and SEI on the street; lower MLU and AS are associated with a moderate atmosphere of spiritual perception of place (Figure 12b). Similarly, streets with higher GVI and PES in particular, as well as higher INT, SEI and AS, are more likely to have a better spiritual perception of place (Figure 12c).

4.3.3. Interaction Effects between Explanatory Variables

Here, we analyzed SHAP PDP to investigate the interaction among several key variables in the XGBoost model predictions, namely the PES, GVI, SEI and AS (Figure 13). The scatter plots with red and blue points show the variations in the variable and the SHAP values of the variable.
Figure 13 shows that as the PES on the street increases, it becomes more conducive to enhancing the spiritual perception of place. At the same time, we can also observe that PES interacts with GVI and PSB in shaping the spiritual perception of street places, respectively. For example, on streets with lower spiritual perception of place, there was a significant change in the trend for PES of 35%, with a higher uniformity in SHAP values above 35% compared to below it. This suggests that above 35%, the impact on spiritual perception increases with SHAP value, while below this threshold, lower SHAP values indicate a reduced contribution to the spiritual atmosphere, with GVI exerting a greater influence on the model.
Figure 14 demonstrates that GVI contributes to the level of spiritual perception of place. We observed that GVI interacted with PHM, MLU, and PES on the levels of spiritual perception of street places, respectively. For example, in areas with poor spiritual perception, the SHAP value of GVI increases in the opposite direction to GVI itself, with an interaction PHM that decreases as it approaches red, and the SHAP value of GVI decreases. In areas with average spiritual perception, GVI is in the 10–25% range, and the SHAP value of GVI decreases as MLU increases, contributing to the spiritual perception rating.
Figure 15 illustrates that a higher SEI is more conducive to the ratings of spiritual perception of place. For example, the SEI and SEI SHAP values exhibit a notable variation of around 40%, with a higher spiritual perception of place at this threshold. From the graph, it can be concluded that the SHAP value is relatively high at 40% and tends to flatten out and remain constant as the index rises. We can infer that, below 40%, increasing SEI significantly enhances model predictions, while above this threshold, the contribution of SEI diminishes, and the interaction with GVI becomes more influential. Figure 16 shows that the trend shifts significantly around 50% for PAS. Below 50%, as MLU increases, the PAS SHAP value decreases, indicating a reduced impact on the model. Above 50%, the PAS SHAP value increases significantly with increasing MLU, closer to red.

4.3.4. Threshold Effects of Explanatory Variables

Based on the results of the relative importance of the independent variables and the interactions above, four explanatory variables (i.e., PES, GVI, INT, and MLU) were selected to investigate threshold effects, all of which exhibit significant non-linear relationships in predicting the ranking of spiritual perception of place. Figure 17 presents the PDP of four critical explanatory variables, illustrating their nonlinear effects on the excellent rating of spiritual perception with XGBoost. These four one-way partial dependence plots demonstrate the marginal impact of each feature on the model’s predictions, with all other features held constant.
Figure 17a illustrates a positive correlation between PES and spiritual perception of place, with an optimal range of 38–65% where the impact is significant. This range is the threshold, significantly influencing model predictions. Above 80%, the impact continues to increase, possibly due to enhanced social interactions in historical and cultural areas, emphasizing the importance of public spaces in cultural district revitalization for improved experiences.
Figure 17b indicates that GVI’s threshold for enhancing spiritual perception is 15–34%, after which its impact tends to plateau. Increased GVI has been associated with a positive perception of the environment, reduced stress and improved mood. Higher GVI has been linked to positive environmental perception, reduced stress, improved mood and enhanced social interaction and community cohesion [83,84,85,86]. However, the figure suggests that the contribution of GVI to enhanced spiritual perception is lower in the 34–40% range, indicating that further increases may lead to diminishing returns.
Figure 17c indicates that INT’s threshold for enhancing spiritual perception of place is 140–180, with its impact on place perception remaining constant beyond 180. This aligns with Manzo et al.’s study [87]: even if we do not express ourselves similarly, we can learn from it. This suggests that community accessibility affects community cohesion and identity to some extent. Better traffic mobility conditions promote social cohesion [88], and this ease and accessibility increase positive feelings about the place and enhance the experience and satisfaction of being there. However, excessive traffic can impede travel, especially as road integration increases.
Figure 17d indicates that MLU’s threshold for enhancing spiritual perception is around 40–52%, with a stable impact on better spiritual perception of place above 65%. It is easy to notice from this figure that the probability of the model prediction plummets around 60% of the functional mix. This may be because highly mixed blocks attract different types of people to communicate and interact [89], creating a unique community culture. However, excessive mixed land use can lead to traffic and noise issues, which can detract from the place’s spirit in historic and cultural districts. Carrying the local humanistic colors is more important for historic and cultural districts. The weaker traffic carrying capacity and the intrusion of foreign functional elements have caused the living space of residents to be compressed, which will negatively impact the place’s spirit.

5. Discussion

5.1. Impact of Street Environment Indicators on the Spiritual Perception of Place

Based on the threshold effect elaborated in Section 4.3.4, we further discuss the influence of four notable explanatory variables (i.e., PES, MLU, SEI, and PAS) on the better rating of spiritual perception of place.
We have established that PES is a primary factor shaping the spiritual perception of street places, aligning with Abusaada et al.’s findings [43]. Enduring participation exhibits complex and varied behaviors that will enhance placemaking, fulfill individual identity and expressive needs and contribute to developing citizens’ sense of attachment to their local communities [90,91].
From Figure 11, we observe that MLU has a minimal impact on the rating predicting spiritual perception of street places. This suggests that enhancing MLU may not directly influence spiritual perception, but does so indirectly through mediating factors, aligning with Fang et al.’s findings. MLU influences spiritual perception through functional attractiveness, traffic accessibility and social group tolerance [88], promoting social interaction and cohesion [92,93] and increasing the potential for interaction with others. Communication is an essential way of generating place identity. As Goffman’s interactionism theory suggests, individuals can make social connections, share common values and identities, and gain a sense of identity and belonging to a particular place through social interaction [94].
SEI demonstrates a weak positive correlation on better rating of the spiritual perception of street places, with a non-linear effect as observed in Figure 18a. This is not quite in line with the findings of Alain Jacobs et al., who concluded that intimate environments create spaces with high interface enclosure that enable people to stay, and low enclosure in open spaces that make people feel comfortable [95]. However, the study area’s historical and cultural nature, along with Congtai Park’s large area and the wall surrounding it, hinder social interaction and spiritual perception. Gehl’s work suggests that ground-floor facades have a significant emotional impact, with open and attractive ones encouraging engagement [96]. Gorgul et al. also noted that streets with more shop windows and openings facilitate social interaction [97]. Therefore, moderate enclosures can create a warm and intimate street atmosphere in historical and cultural blocks, enhancing people’s sense of security and belonging. However, the ground floor of buildings in street facades is pivotal for public engagement and social interaction [98,99].
In this paper, PAS poorly predicts the spiritual perception of street places in the better grade, with an ambiguous threshold effect seen in Figure 18b. Which is not consistent with the present findings. Public spaces in historical and cultural blocks are complex, merging material and immaterial needs [100], and historic districts carry the spatial characteristics of the spirit of place due to historical evolution and human activities [101]. Because places with historical and cultural factors contribute to local identity formation [66,102], places with a sense of age tend to evoke place attachment [103]. However, the cultural heritage in Chuancheng Street, such as municipal cultural protection units and Ming and Qing Dynasty buildings, has not been well-preserved; despite efforts to maintain their original style, their cultural heritage has yet to be completely recovered. The embodiment of the spirit of place should be dynamic, relating not only to the architectural value of the local landscape but also to the time of interaction and exchange between residents [104,105]. This underscores the importance of deeply exploring the unique historical and cultural spirit to enhance people’s sense of identity with historical district places [8].

5.2. Impact of Cultural Heritage Authenticity on the Spiritual Perception of Place

We further integrated perception scores with street administrative divisions, averaged them and mapped them to the map to obtain the comprehensive perception situation of the eight street administrative divisions, as shown in Figure 19a. Here, we categorized the perception scores into five levels for a detailed evaluation. The East Congtai Block stands out with an excellent comprehensive perception evaluation, while Sijiqing, Zhonghua, and Lingyuan Road Blocks have average scores. West Lianfang and Huomo Blocks fare poorly, and West Congtai and Heping Blocks are the worst. This indicates a generally poor spiritual perception of place in the Chuancheng Street area, with high-scoring spaces primarily along Zhonghua Avenue and Renmin Road.
Figure 19a presents the comprehensive place spirit perception score of 2.62 for the core area of Chuancheng Street in the Zhonghua Block. Figure 19b indicates that the core area generally has a high NACH. The direction to Renmin Road and Zhonghua Avenue has good traffic movement potential, especially the surrounding lanes, which also have good traffic potential. At this point, despite the high Integration in the core area (Figure 7d) the surrounding lanes are relatively low, and there is no strong potential to attract people without a specific purpose. The East Congtai and Zhonghua Blocks, situated near Renmin Road and Zhonghua Avenue, benefit from superior traffic conditions, business districts, and heritage conservation units. The East Congtai Block has a significantly higher perception score of 4.52 compared to the Zhonghua Block.
Investigating the reason behind the high perception score in the East Congtai Block reveals that its cultural relics protection units are well-preserved and actively open to the public, maintaining their original functions. These heritage sites provide an excellent spiritual medium between the past and present. The museum complex has slowly transformed into a cultural space that precipitates and inherits local culture and lifestyle customs in urban historical changes, which contains historical value and local significance related to time, space and events. In addition, the area’s large squares and green spaces also cater to public leisure and recreation. The authenticity of local humanities promotes the formation of local attachment and sense of place [106,107,108]. In contrast, the loss of cultural heritage authenticity in the core area of Chuancheng Street negatively impacts residents’ cultural cognition and social activities [109]. The atmosphere of urban blocks is shaped by prioritizing activities and functions over form [70], which is crucial for preserving historical memory and enhancing residents’ identity and direction. All in all, what is more important here is whether the spiritual medium provided by the place is compelling enough for citizens, and whether the cultural space preserves the memory of the city community through historical changes. This aligns with previous research findings [110,111,112]. These also explain precisely why cultural space elements are not easily perceived by people in the first place.

5.3. The Research Limitations

Although this study has explored the factors and nonlinear effects of the spiritual perception of street places in historic districts, we must acknowledge that there are still some shortcomings. This study has developed a three-dimensional indicator assessment system for physical, cultural and behavioral spaces, based on the spiritual perception of street places. However, it is limited by the lack of research data types for diverse social groups and the inefficiency of technical research methods. First, the study’s selection of physical space indicators requires revision due to their complexity, and future research should incorporate additional data such as architectural colors. Second, location-tagged Internet comment data contain the subject’s emotional perception of place, and a more comprehensive perception of place could be achieved by introducing semantic text analysis in subsequent studies [24]. Third, the acquisition of crowd behavior data is subject to human error, and future research may consider using OpenCV and YOLO5 algorithms to build behavioral recognition models, enhancing efficiency and accuracy. Lastly, given the existence of semantic segmentation models with better performance, we intend to incorporate the DeepLab-V3 plus_Cityscapes architecture into our future research to process street view imagery.

6. Conclusions

This study constructs a method for assessing the spiritual perception of places in historic district streets, based on human–place relationship theory and artificial intelligence technology, with place taken as a cognitive perspective. The highlights of our research include: (1) The integration of social behavior and local culture as explanatory variables. (2) The use of deep learning and ML to quantify the spiritual perception of place. (3) Interpretable ML technique to explore the potential for urban street space spatial renewal remodeling and cultural revitalization.
Our investigation has concluded that citizen behavior significantly contributes to the spiritual atmosphere of places in historical and cultural blocks. In addition, the authenticity of cultural heritage is pivotal in shaping the spiritual perception of place and fostering sustainable development of the urban context. The methodology used in this study can effectively assess the spiritual perception of places in historic neighborhoods, offering guidance for enhancing street perceptions. The spiritual perception of street places of historical and cultural blocks and the three-dimensional indicators proposed in this paper can be applied in contemporary urban spatial remodeling and cultural regeneration, providing valuable references for people’s urban development. Furthermore, with the availability of multi-source data, the methodology can be extended to assess place perception in various urban historic districts.
Future work aims to utilize multi-source data from different social groups to conduct large-scale urban research. Further deepening the connotation of place perception data in historic districts, we intend to understand the characteristics of places from spatial interactions and attempt to delineate the scope of places. Last but not least, we should consider applying traditional methods of evaluating cultural, architectural and social values in urban spaces in further research to conduct comparative studies and assess the consistency of the conclusions drawn from traditional analyses versus numerical and digital methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M., W.H. and N.C.; methodology, N.C., S.M. and W.H.; software, W.H.; formal analysis, W.H.; investigation, W.H., Y.Q. and Y.X.; data curation, W.H; writing—original draft preparation, W.H. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, N.C. and W.H.; visualization, W.H.; supervision, Y.Q. and Z.C.; project administration, Y.X. and Z.C.; funding acquisition, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hebei Social Science Foundation in 2023, China (Grant No. HB23YS021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Data available on request due to restrictions, e.g., privacy or ethical.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the students from Hebei University of Engineering for their assistance in the questionnaire investigation. We would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped improve this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Norberg-Schulz, C. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture; Rizzoli: New York, NY, USA, 1979; p. 213. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vecco, M. Genius loci as a meta-concept. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 41, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cartel, M.; Kibler, E.; Dacin, M.T. Unpacking “Sense of Place” and “Place-making” in Organization Studies: A Toolkit for Place-sensitive Research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2022, 58, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Erfani, G. Reconceptualising Sense of Place: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Investigating Individual-Community-Place Interrelationships. J. Plan. Lit. 2022, 37, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalali, P. Meaningful perception of place: The most effective dimensions and factors. URBAN DESIGN Int. 2015, 20, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valdenebro, J.-V.; Gimena, F.N. Urban utility tunnels as a long-term solution for the sustainable revitalization of historic centres: The case study of Pamplona-Spain. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 81, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Günaydın, A.; Altunkasa, M. Developing the socio-spatial integration of historical city centers with spatial strategies: The case of Gaziantep. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 8092–8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussein, F.; Stephens, J.; Tiwari, R. Cultural Memories and Sense of Place in Historic Urban Landscapes: The Case of Masrah Al Salam, the Demolished Theatre Context in Alexandria, Egypt. Land 2020, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, Y.; He, M.-e.; Liu, C. Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation Model of Urban Historical and Cultural Districts Based on Multi-Source Data and the AHP Method: A Case Study in Suzhou Ancient City. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Fu, W.; Zhuo, Z.; van den Bosch, C.C.K.; Huang, Q.; Lan, S. More meaningful, more restorative? Linking local landscape characteristics and place attachment to restorative perceptions of urban park visitors. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 197, 103763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moughtin, C. Urban Design: Street and Square, 3rd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2003; p. 314. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sun, H.; Xu, H.; He, H.; Wei, Q.; Yan, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, T. A Spatial Analysis of Urban Streets under Deep Learning Based on Street View Imagery: Quantifying Perceptual and Elemental Perceptual Relationships. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carmona, M.; Gabrieli, T.; Hickman, R.; Laopoulou, T.; Livingstone, N. Street appeal: The value of street improvements. Prog. Plan. 2018, 126, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Kleef, G.A.; Côté, S. The social effects of emotions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2022, 73, 629–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, R.; Feng, Z.; Pearce, J.; Liu, Y.; Dong, G. Are greenspace quantity and quality associated with mental health through different mechanisms in Guangzhou, China: A comparison study using street view data. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 117976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gao, Q.; Yin, D.; Zhu, H. Urban regeneration and emotional politics of place in Liede Village, Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int. 2020, 103, 102199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zani, G.; Low, J. Botanical priming helps overcome plant blindness on a memory task. J. Environ. Psychol. 2022, 81, 101808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Corley, J.; Okely, J.A.; Taylor, A.M.; Page, D.; Welstead, M.; Skarabela, B.; Redmond, P.; Cox, S.R.; Russ, T.C. Home garden use during COVID-19: Associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults. J Environ. Psychol. 2021, 73, 101545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lloyd, R. Spatial Cognition: Geographic Environments; Springer: Boston, MA, USA; Kluwer Academic: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. XXIII, 287. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tolman, E.C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 1948, 55, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Montello, D.; Goodchild, M.; Gottsegen, J.; Fohl, P. Where’s Downtown? Behavioral Methods for Determining Referents of Vague Spatial Queries. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2003, 3, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lynch, K. The Image of the City; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960; p. 208. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y. A Cognitive Approach to Modeling Vague Geographical Features: A Case Study of Zhongguancun. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Lu, F.; Liu, Y. Place Model and Big Geo-Data Supported Place Sensing. Geomat. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 2020, 45, 1930–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Purves, R.S.; Winter, S.; Kuhn, W. Places in information science. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 70, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, Y. Revisiting several basic geographical concepts: A social sensing perspective. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2016, 71, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dodds, P.S.; Harris, K.D.; Kloumann, I.M.; Bliss, C.A.; Danforth, C.M. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ma, X.; Ma, C.; Wu, C.; Xi, Y.; Yang, R.; Peng, N.; Zhang, C.; Ren, F. Measuring human perceptions of streetscapes to better inform urban renewal: A perspective of scene semantic parsing. Cities 2021, 110, 103086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Yabuki, N.; Fukuda, T. Measuring visual walkability perception using panoramic street view images, virtual reality, and deep learning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 86, 104140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cai, Q.; Abdel-Aty, M.; Zheng, O.; Wu, Y. Applying machine learning and google street view to explore effects of drivers’ visual environment on traffic safety. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2022, 135, 103541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, M.; Huang, J.; Thomas, F.; Rahimi, K.; Mamouei, M. An interpretable machine learning framework for measuring urban perceptions from panoramic street view images. iScience 2023, 26, 106132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dai, L.; Zheng, C.; Dong, Z.; Yao, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Zhang, J.; Song, X.; Guan, Q. Analyzing the correlation between visual space and residents’ psychology in Wuhan, China using street-view images and deep-learning technique. City Environ. Interact. 2021, 11, 100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, F.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Lin, H. Representing place locales using scene elements. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2018, 71, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, S.; Wang, B.; Liu, W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, S. Assessment of street space quality and subjective well-being mismatch and its impact, using multi-source big data. Cities 2024, 147, 104797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Ito, K.; Biljecki, F. Assessing the equity and evolution of urban visual perceptual quality with time series street view imagery. Cities 2024, 145, 104704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shin, H.-S.; Woo, A. Analyzing the effects of walkable environments on nearby commercial property values based on deep learning approaches. Cities 2024, 144, 104628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rui, J. Measuring streetscape perceptions from driveways and sidewalks to inform pedestrian-oriented street renewal in Düsseldorf. Cities 2023, 141, 104472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, H.; He, S.; Cai, Y.; Wang, M.; Su, S. Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: Using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, M.; Zhang, F.; Duarte, F.; Ratti, C. Understanding architecture age and style through deep learning. Cities 2022, 128, 103787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meetiyagoda, L.; Mahanama, P.K.S.; Ley, A.; Amarawickrama, S. A ladder of sense of place: Case study of Crow Island Beach Park, Sri Lanka. Cities 2024, 145, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shamai, S. Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum 1991, 22, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oyama, Y. Spatial city image and its formative factors: A street-based neighborhood cognition analysis. Cities 2024, 149, 104898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abusaada, H.; Elshater, A. Effect of people on placemaking and affective atmospheres in city streets. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 3389–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ortega-Gil, M.; Mata García, A.; ElHichou-Ahmed, C. The Effect of Ageing, Gender and Environmental Problems in Subjective Well-Being. Land 2021, 10, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nzimande, N.P.; Morris-Kolawole, F. Does Size Really Matter for the Place Attachment of High-Rise and Low-Rise Housing Estates? A Budapest Case Study. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zeng, Q.; Gong, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhuang, C.; Li, S. Measuring cyclists’ subjective perceptions of the street riding environment using K-means SMOTE-RF model and street view imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2024, 128, 103739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barredo Arrieta, A.; Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Bennetot, A.; Tabik, S.; Barbado, A.; Garcia, S.; Gil-Lopez, S.; Molina, D.; Benjamins, R.; et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 2020, 58, 82–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Yuan, H.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Adnan Ikram, R.M.; Li, J. An XGBoost-SHAP approach to quantifying morphological impact on urban flooding susceptibility. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 156, 111137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, Y.; Kim, Y. Explainable heat-related mortality with random forest and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 79, 103677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Lan, M.; Song, G.; Xiao, L.; Chen, J. Interpretable machine learning models for crime prediction. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2022, 94, 101789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Futagami, K.; Fukazawa, Y.; Kapoor, N.; Kito, T. Pairwise acquisition prediction with SHAP value interpretation. J. Financ. Data Sci. 2021, 7, 22–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zeng, W.; Davoodi, A.; Topaloglu, R.O. Explainable DRC Hotspot Prediction with Random Forest and SHAP Tree Explainer. In Proceedings of the 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Grenoble, France, 9–13 March 2020; pp. 1151–1156. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, X.; Shi, L.; Shi, Y.; Tang, J.; Zhao, P.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J. Exploring interactive and nonlinear effects of key factors on intercity travel mode choice using XGBoost. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 166, 103264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ziqi, L. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2022, 96, 101845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Handan Municipal People’s Government. Overview of Handan: Physical Geography. Available online: https://www.hd.gov.cn/zjhd/hdgk/zrdl/ (accessed on 21 October 2023).
  56. Bureau, H.S. Handan City 2022 National Economic and Social Development Statistics Bulletin. Available online: https://www.hd.gov.cn/hdzfxxgk/gszbm/auto23694/202304/t20230404_1859421.html (accessed on 21 October 2023).
  57. Wang, L.; Han, X.; He, J.; Jung, T. Measuring residents’ perceptions of city streets to inform better street planning through deep learning and space syntax. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 190, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bureau Natural Resources and Planning. Plan for the Protection of Handan Famous Historical and Cultural City (2020–2035) (Draft for Public Comments). Available online: https://zrgh.hd.gov.cn/xwdt/gggs/202011/t20201106_1390148.html (accessed on 30 November 2023).
  59. Rui, S.; Yaoyu, L.; Zuopeng, X.; Yu, Y. Spatio-temporal Analysis of Built Environment and Street Vitality Relationship Based on Street-level Imagery: A Case Study of Futian District, Shenzhen. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2021, 41, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akbar, P.N.G.; Edelenbos, J. Positioning place-making as a social process: A systematic literature review. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2021, 7, 1905920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Walker, H.K.; Hall, W.D.; Hurst, J.W. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations; Butterworths: Boston, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhu, J.; Gong, Y.; Liu, C.; Du, J.; Song, C.; Chen, J.; Pei, T. Assessing the Effects of Subjective and Objective Measures on Housing Prices with Street View Imagery: A Case Study of Suzhou. Land 2023, 12, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, L.-C.; Papandreou, G.; Schroff, F.; Adam, H. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lebendiger, Y.; Lerman, Y. Applying space syntax for surface rapid transit planning. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 128, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jane, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 528. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bista, D.; Bista, A.; Shrestha, A.; Doulos, L.T.; Bhusal, P.; Zissis, G.; Topalis, F.; Chhetri, B.B. Lighting for Cultural and Heritage Site: An Innovative Approach for Lighting in the Distinct Pagoda-Style Architecture of Nepal. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Delsante, I.; Zheng, C. Contemporary Chinese Architects and Type: Courtyard based Case Studies in Shanghai Area. Athens J. Archit. 2018, 4, 289–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rong, W.; Bahauddin, A. Heritage and Rehabilitation Strategies for Confucian Courtyard Architecture: A Case Study in Liaocheng, China. Buildings 2023, 13, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mahmoudi Farahani, L.; Setayesh, M.; Shokrollahi, L. Contextualizing palimpsest of collective memory in an urban heritage site: Case study of Chahar Bagh, Shiraz—Iran. Int. J. Archit. Res. 2015, 9, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lak, A.; Hakimian, P. Collective memory and urban regeneration in urban spaces: Reproducing memories in Baharestan Square, city of Tehran, Iran. City Cult. Soc. 2019, 18, 100290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Horváth, Z. Cultural value perception in the memorable tourism experience. In The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Tourism; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013; pp. 396–403. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sulis, P.; Manley, E.; Zhong, C.; Batty, M. Using mobility data as proxy for measuring urban vitality. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2018, 2018, 137–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, Y.; Belyi, A.; Bojic, I.; Ratti, C. How friends share urban space: An exploratory spatiotemporal analysis using mobile phone data. Trans. GIS 2017, 21, 468–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, L.; Wei, W. International Experiences of Tools and Approaches for Assessment of Walkability. Urban Plan. Int. 2018, 33, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mehta, V. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; p. 256. [Google Scholar]
  76. Meng, L.; Wen, K.-H.; Zeng, Z.; Brewin, R.; Fan, X.; Wu, Q. The Impact of Street Space Perception Factors on Elderly Health in High-Density Cities in Macau—Analysis Based on Street View Images and Deep Learning Technology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; pp. 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yao, Y.; Liang, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, P.; Bie, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, J.; Guan, Q. A human-machine adversarial scoring framework for urban perception assessment using street-view images. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2019, 33, 2363–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016; pp. 785–794. [Google Scholar]
  80. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G.E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 2017, 60, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Urista, D.V.; Carrué, D.B.; Otero, I.; Arrasate, S.; Quevedo-Tumailli, V.F.; Gestal, M.; González-Díaz, H.; Munteanu, C.R. Prediction of Antimalarial Drug-Decorated Nanoparticle Delivery Systems with Random Forest Models. Biology 2020, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lundberg, S.M.; Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 December 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lambert, N.M.; Stillman, T.F.; Hicks, J.A.; Kamble, S.; Baumeister, R.F.; Fincham, F.D. To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 39, 1418–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kessel, A.; Green, J.; Pinder, R.; Wilkinson, P.; Grundy, C.; Lachowycz, K. Multidisciplinary research in public health: A case study of research on access to green space. Public Health 2009, 123, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, A.C.; Maheswaran, R. The health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence. J. Public Health 2011, 33, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Müggenburg, H.; Blitz, A.; Lanzendorf, M. What is a good design for a cycle street?—User perceptions of safety and attractiveness of different street layouts. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2022, 10, 1375–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Manzo, L.; Devine-Wright, P. Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013; p. 232. [Google Scholar]
  88. Xia, F.; Lu, P. Can mixed land use promote social integration? Multiple mediator analysis based on spatiotemporal big data in Beijing. Land Use Policy 2023, 132, 106800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gehl, J. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; p. 211. [Google Scholar]
  90. Andrades, L.; Dimanche, F. Co-creation of experience value: A tourist behaviour approach. In Creating Experience Value in Tourism, 1st ed.; Prebensen, N.K., Chen, J.S., Uysal, M., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2014; pp. 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  91. Suntikul, W.; Jachna, T. The co-creation/place attachment nexus. Tour. Manag. 2016, 52, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ghosh, P.A.; Raval, P.M. Modelling urban mixed land-use prediction using influence parameters. GEOSCAPE 2021, 15, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bhadra, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Sarkar, K. Impact of population density on Covid-19 infected and mortality rate in India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2020, 7, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life; Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 1959; p. 272. [Google Scholar]
  95. Jacobs, A.B. Great Streets; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; p. 344. [Google Scholar]
  96. Gehl, J.; Kaefer, L.J.; Reigstad, S. Close encounters with buildings. Urban Des. Int. 2006, 11, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gorgul, E.; Chen, C.; Wu, K.K.; Guo, Y. Measuring street enclosure and its influence to human physiology through wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, London, UK, 9–13 September 2019; pp. 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  98. Antocheviz, F.B.; Arsego, C.; Reis, A.T. Transformations of ground floors: Effects on the perception of security and the occurrence of crime. Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Res. 2021, 15, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hassan, D.M.; Moustafa, Y.M.; El-Fiki, S.M. Ground-floor facade design and staying activity patterns on the sidewalk: A case study in the Korba area of Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2019, 10, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ding, F.; Ren, Y.; Goudos, S.; Zhao, Y. Analysis of Public Space in Historic Districts Based on Community Governance and Neural Networks. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 81021–81032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Icomos, U. The Valletta principles for the safeguarding and management of historic cities, towns and urban areas. In Proceedings of the 17th ICOMOS General Assembly, Paris, France, 28 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhang, F.; Sun, X.; Liu, C.; Qiu, B. Effects of Urban Landmark Landscapes on Residents’ Place Identity: The Moderating Role of Residence Duration. Sustainability 2024, 16, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wells, J.C. How are old places different from new places? A psychological investigation of the correlation between patina, spontaneous fantasies, and place attachment. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2017, 23, 445–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, Y.; Han, Y. Vitality evaluation of historical and cultural districts based on the values dimension: Districts in Beijing City, China. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yung, E.H.K.; Chan, E.H.W.; Xu, Y. Sustainable Development and the Rehabilitation of a Historic Urban District—Social Sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 22, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jiang, Y.; Ramkissoon, H.; Mavondo, F.T.; Feng, S. Authenticity: The Link between Destination Image and Place Attachment. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2017, 26, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yi, X.; Fu, X.; So, K.K.F.; Zheng, C. Perceived Authenticity and Place Attachment: New Findings from Chinese World Heritage Sites. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2023, 47, 800–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cong, G.; Zhang, H.; Chen, T. A Study on the Perception of Authenticity of Tourist Destinations and the Place Attachment of Potential Tourists— The Case of Ding Zhen’s Endorsement of Ganzi, Sichuan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Farrelly, F.; Kock, F.; Josiassen, A. Cultural heritage authenticity: A producer view. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019, 79, 102770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Christou, P.A.; Farmaki, A.; Saveriades, A.; Spanou, E. The “genius loci” of places that experience intense tourism development. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 30, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ram, Y.; Björk, P.; Weidenfeld, A. Authenticity and place attachment of major visitor attractions. Tour. Manag. 2016, 52, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Trentin, M.G.; Altaratz, D.; Caine, M.; Re’em, A.; Tinazzo, A.; Gasanova, S. Historic Graffiti as a Visual Medium for the Sustainable Development of the Underground Built Heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of the study area for the present study: (a) Location of Hebei Province in northern China; (b) Location of Handan within Hebei Province; (c) Administrative districts of Handan, highlighting Chuancheng Street area; (d) Road network in Chuancheng Street area.
Figure 1. Overview of the study area for the present study: (a) Location of Hebei Province in northern China; (b) Location of Handan within Hebei Province; (c) Administrative districts of Handan, highlighting Chuancheng Street area; (d) Road network in Chuancheng Street area.
Sustainability 16 05182 g001
Figure 2. Research framework for the present study.
Figure 2. Research framework for the present study.
Sustainability 16 05182 g002
Figure 3. Presentation of urban place in the Chuancheng Street districts: (a) Children on the square; (b) Roads in the historical district; (c) Handan Art Museum; (d) Aerial view of the historical district; (e) Street vendors in the old city; (f) The aged enjoying the cool breeze on the roadside.
Figure 3. Presentation of urban place in the Chuancheng Street districts: (a) Children on the square; (b) Roads in the historical district; (c) Handan Art Museum; (d) Aerial view of the historical district; (e) Street vendors in the old city; (f) The aged enjoying the cool breeze on the roadside.
Sustainability 16 05182 g003
Figure 4. Example of the BSVIs collection process: (a) Road network and sample points in Chuancheng Street area; (b) Horizontal view diagram; (c) Vertical view diagram.
Figure 4. Example of the BSVIs collection process: (a) Road network and sample points in Chuancheng Street area; (b) Horizontal view diagram; (c) Vertical view diagram.
Sustainability 16 05182 g004
Figure 5. Overview of the spatial perception scoring process for urban streets based on machine learning.
Figure 5. Overview of the spatial perception scoring process for urban streets based on machine learning.
Sustainability 16 05182 g005
Figure 6. Sample SVIs: (a) Five typical streetscape images; (b) Semantic recognition results of BSVIs; (c) Eight main feature dimensions in the semantic segmentation results; (d) Three perceptual sores for BSVIs.
Figure 6. Sample SVIs: (a) Five typical streetscape images; (b) Semantic recognition results of BSVIs; (c) Eight main feature dimensions in the semantic segmentation results; (d) Three perceptual sores for BSVIs.
Sustainability 16 05182 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of street environment element characteristics: (a) Spatial distribution of GVI; (b) Spatial distribution of SEI; (c) Spatial distribution of MLU; (d) Spatial distribution of INT; (e) Spatial distribution of PES; (f) Spatial distribution of PAS.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of street environment element characteristics: (a) Spatial distribution of GVI; (b) Spatial distribution of SEI; (c) Spatial distribution of MLU; (d) Spatial distribution of INT; (e) Spatial distribution of PES; (f) Spatial distribution of PAS.
Sustainability 16 05182 g007aSustainability 16 05182 g007b
Figure 8. Behavioral characteristics form grouped stacked bar charts: (a) Behavior type results for street spot positions 1–100; (b) Behavior type results for street spot positions 101–200; (c) Behavior type results for street spot positions 201–300; (d) Behavior type results for street spot positions 301–390.
Figure 8. Behavioral characteristics form grouped stacked bar charts: (a) Behavior type results for street spot positions 1–100; (b) Behavior type results for street spot positions 101–200; (c) Behavior type results for street spot positions 201–300; (d) Behavior type results for street spot positions 301–390.
Sustainability 16 05182 g008
Figure 9. Spatial distribution patterns of block place comprehensive perception.
Figure 9. Spatial distribution patterns of block place comprehensive perception.
Sustainability 16 05182 g009
Figure 10. Evaluation effect of XGBoost model.
Figure 10. Evaluation effect of XGBoost model.
Sustainability 16 05182 g010
Figure 11. Overall feature importance.
Figure 11. Overall feature importance.
Sustainability 16 05182 g011
Figure 12. Feature importance of variables for each level: (a) Feature importance of variables for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Feature importance of variables for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Feature importance of variables for better spiritual perception of place.
Figure 12. Feature importance of variables for each level: (a) Feature importance of variables for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Feature importance of variables for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Feature importance of variables for better spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g012
Figure 13. Interaction of the PES: (a) Interaction of the PES for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of the PES for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of the PES for better spiritual perception of place.
Figure 13. Interaction of the PES: (a) Interaction of the PES for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of the PES for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of the PES for better spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g013
Figure 14. Interaction of GVI: (a) Interaction of GVI for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of GVI for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of GVI for better spiritual perception of place.
Figure 14. Interaction of GVI: (a) Interaction of GVI for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of GVI for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of GVI for better spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g014
Figure 15. Interaction of SEI: (a) Interaction of SEI for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of SEI for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of SEI for better spiritual perception of place.
Figure 15. Interaction of SEI: (a) Interaction of SEI for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of SEI for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of SEI for better spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g015
Figure 16. Interaction of PAS: (a) Interaction of PAS for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of PAS for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of PAS for better spiritual perception of place.
Figure 16. Interaction of PAS: (a) Interaction of PAS for poorer spiritual perception of place; (b) Interaction of PAS for average spiritual perception of place; (c) Interaction of PAS for better spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g016
Figure 17. Obvious nonlinear effects of explanatory variables on the spiritual perception of place.
Figure 17. Obvious nonlinear effects of explanatory variables on the spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g017
Figure 18. Nonlinear effects of SEI&PAS on the spiritual perception of place.
Figure 18. Nonlinear effects of SEI&PAS on the spiritual perception of place.
Sustainability 16 05182 g018
Figure 19. Impact of cultural heritage authenticity on the spiritual perception of place: (a) Comprehensive perception scores of street administrative divisions; (b) Spatial distribution of NACH_800 m.
Figure 19. Impact of cultural heritage authenticity on the spiritual perception of place: (a) Comprehensive perception scores of street administrative divisions; (b) Spatial distribution of NACH_800 m.
Sustainability 16 05182 g019
Table 1. A detailed description of the study data.
Table 1. A detailed description of the study data.
DataSourceNumber of RecordsTime
RoadBaiduMaps382023
POIAmap66902023
StreetscapeBaiduMaps50902023
CultureField research, BSVIs,
Handan Natural Resources and Planning Bureau
16412023
Behavioron-site recording33872023
Table 2. Indicators and data sources for measuring the spatial quality of streets.
Table 2. Indicators and data sources for measuring the spatial quality of streets.
DimensionsIndicatorsVariablesDescriptionData Sources
Physical space elementsSpatial featuresGreen view index (GVI)Mean value of pixel ratio of recognizable plants in streetscape images for each streetscape point(c)
Sky view index (SVI)Mean value of pixel ratio of recognizable sky in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Street enclosure index (SEI)Mean value of pixel ratio of recognizable buildings, fences and other elements in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Pedestrian safety index (PSI)Mean value of pixel ratio of recognizable walking paths in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Crowd concentration index (CCI)Mean value of pixel ratio of recognizable pedestrians in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Vehicle interference index (VII)Mean value of pixel ratio of identifiable motor vehicles in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Façade unit index (FUI)Ratio of the number of identifiable doors and windows to the length of the street in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Interface transparency index (ITI)Mean value of pixel ratios of identifiable glass and other elements in streetscape images for each streetscape point
Facility enrichment index (FEI)Mean value of pixel ratios occupied by recognizable benches, tables and other elements in streetscape images for each streetscape point
ConvenienceNormalized Angular Choice (NACH)Number of times each street segment is crossed by the shortest path between any two other street segments within 800 m(a)
Integration (INT)Distance from each street segment to other street segments within 800 m
Mixed land use (MLU)Shannon Diversity Index corresponding to each street attraction(b)
Cultural space elementsCity culturePercentage of architectural style (PAS)Ratio of the total length of buildings with distinctive styles in the buffer zone of each streetscape to the length of the street(d)
Percentage of historical memory (PHM)Ratio of the number of old trees, iconic buildings, and sculptural vignettes in the buffer zone of each streetscape to the area of the street
Human behavioral elementsBehavioral categoriesPercentage of passive sociability (PPS)Ratio of the number of behavioral categories in the buffer zone of each streetscape to the total street area(e)
Percentage of fleeting sociability (PFS)
Percentage of enduring sociability (PES)
Note: (a) Road data; (b) POI data; (c) Street view data; (d) Culture data; (e) Behavior data.
Table 3. The parameter configuration of the DeepLab-V3_ResNet101_ADE-20k framework.
Table 3. The parameter configuration of the DeepLab-V3_ResNet101_ADE-20k framework.
ParameterImplicationValue
Input ResolutionThe size of the image entered into the model1024 × 512
Batch_SizeThe number of samples used in a single gradient update16
EpochsThe number of complete iterations of the model over the entire training dataset120
Learning RateIt determines how much the model parameters are updated in each iteration0.01
PixAccThe ratio of the number of correctly predicted pixels to the total number of pixels is used to measure the accuracy of image segmentation81.1
mIoUMeasures the overlap between the predicted segmentation graph and the true segmentation graph44.1
Table 4. Typological Classification of Social Behavior in the Streets.
Table 4. Typological Classification of Social Behavior in the Streets.
Social RelationshipsPassive SociabilityActive Sociability
Fleeting SociabilityEnduring Sociability
DefinitionEven when there is no desire to socialize actively, people still habitually choose to be alone in public places where other people are present.People greet their neighbors or interact briefly in public places.The process of interacting positively with each other between individuals in close relationships (i.e., partners, friends, and community residents) is a frequent and important human contact.
Specific behaviorEating alone; smoking; contemplating; lounging; carrying goods; watching; cooling off; using a mobile phone; phoning; crafting; fixing things; cleaning up; waiting for the bus.Brief communication; polite non-verbal communication; brief playfulness of children; commercial behavior.Lovers, friends, the elderly, children and parents dine in open-air seating and chat on benches or in front of shops. Playing chess and cards (including watchers); street haircuts; rituals; picking up children to and from school; writing large characters; playing Tai Chi; performing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, S.; Huang, W.; Cui, N.; Cai, Z.; Xu, Y.; Qiao, Y. Exploring Non-Linear and Synergistic Effects of Street Environment on the Spirit of Place in Historic Districts: Using Multi-Source Data and XGBoost. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125182

AMA Style

Ma S, Huang W, Cui N, Cai Z, Xu Y, Qiao Y. Exploring Non-Linear and Synergistic Effects of Street Environment on the Spirit of Place in Historic Districts: Using Multi-Source Data and XGBoost. Sustainability. 2024; 16(12):5182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Shuxiao, Wei Huang, Nana Cui, Zhaoyang Cai, Yan Xu, and Yue Qiao. 2024. "Exploring Non-Linear and Synergistic Effects of Street Environment on the Spirit of Place in Historic Districts: Using Multi-Source Data and XGBoost" Sustainability 16, no. 12: 5182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop