Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Impact of Biomass/Water Ratio, Particle Size, Stirring, and Catalysts on the Production of Chemical Platforms and Biochar in the Hydrothermal Valorization of Coffee Cherry Waste
Previous Article in Journal
Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of the Municipal Waste Stream: Waste into Energy in the Context of a Circular Economy—Economic and Technological Aspects for a Selected Region in Poland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Use of the Fungus Aspergillus sp. to Simultaneously Generate Electricity and Reduce Plastic through Microbial Fuel Cells

by
Segundo Rojas-Flores
1,*,
Magaly De La Cruz-Noriega
1,
Nélida Milly Otiniano
1 and
Luis Cabanillas-Chirinos
2
1
Instituto y Centro de Investigación de la Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo 13001, Peru
2
Investigación Formativa e Integridad Científica, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo 13001, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7413; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177413
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 27 July 2024 / Accepted: 30 July 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024

Abstract

:
The improper disposal of plastic waste has become a significant problem, with only a small amount recycled and the rest ending up in landfills or being burned, leading to environmental pollution. In addition, the cost of electric energy has risen by over 100% in the last 20 years, making it unaffordable for remote areas to access this service due to high installation costs, leaving people living far from major cities without electricity. This study proposes an innovative solution to these issues using microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology to simultaneously reduce plastic waste and generate electric energy by utilizing the fungus Aspergillus sp. As a substrate for 45 days. The MFCs reached maximum values of 0.572 ± 0.024 V and 3.608 ± 0.249 mA of voltage and electric current on the thirty-first day, with the substrate operating at a pH of 6.57 ± 0.27 and an electrical conductivity of 257.12 ± 20.9 mS/cm. Furthermore, it was possible to reduce the chemical oxygen demand by 73.77% over the 45 days of MFC operation, while the recorded internal resistance was 27.417 ± 9.810 Ω, indicating a power density of 0.124 ± 0.006 mW/cm2. The initial and final transmittance spectra, obtained using FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared), showed the characteristic peaks of polyethylene (plastic), with a noticeable reduction in the final spectrum, particularly in the vibration of the C-H compound. After 45 days of fungus operation, the plastic surface used as a sample exhibited perforations and cracks, resulting in a thickness reduction of 313.56 µm. This research represents an initial step in using fungi for plastic reduction and electric energy generation in an alternative and sustainable manner.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the use of plastic has increased significantly and has become a fundamental part of various human activities. From 1950 to 2015, production increased from approximately 2 million metric tons to 320 million, reaching 8.3 billion metric tons in 2017 [1,2,3]. As a result, environmental sustainability has become a danger due to the large amount of plastic waste, which must be collected or reused correctly to avoid severe pollution caused by burning waste or dumping it in landfills or rivers [4]. Only a tiny amount of plastic is recycled globally sustainably, while most of it pollutes the environment, leading to health and environmental problems such as pollution of agricultural soils and oceans [5]. In addition, increased plastic use has been observed due to COVID-19 restrictions [6].
On the other hand, a significant problem that threatens the sustainability of the environment and the human population is the sources of conventional fuels, such as fossil fuels, used for producing electric power [7,8]. It has been reported that if the consumption of fossil fuels continues at the same rate as today or increases, they will be depleted in the next 40 years [9]. In addition, it is estimated that the consumption of this type of source releases 21 million tons of CO2 (carbon dioxide) annually, gradually increasing the greenhouse effect and significantly damaging the environment [10,11]. Although many countries have increased electric power (sustainable) supply to homes, many families still need this service. For example, in South American countries such as Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, and Peru, the percentages of households with access to electricity for cooking are 94.70%, 88.30%, 96.50%, 99.90%, and 85.50%, respectively [12,13]. In this challenging scenario, renewable sources have emerged as an innovative, sustainable solution to meet energy needs, offering a reassuring path forward. In 2020, 1179 GW (gigawatts) of renewable energy were accumulated using sustainable methods, representing an essential and reassuring source of usable electrical energy for society [14].
In the search for new ways to generate electrical energy sustainably, since 1960, microbial fuel cell (MFC) technologies have been evolving to offer society a new alternative source of sustainable energy [15,16]. MFCs are characterized by the electrochemical phenomena within the anodic and cathodic chambers, which convert chemical energy into electrical energy by releasing electrons in the oxidation and reduction process, using different types of organic waste as fuel or substrate [17,18]. In a study by Rincón et al. (2022), banana waste was investigated as a fuel in MFCs, where the results showed peaks of power density of 41.3 mW/m2 and with 580.99 Ω of internal resistance [19]. Similarly, Agudelo et al. (2022) utilized coffee wastewater as a substrate, leading to peaks of 400 mV and a 70% reduction in the concentration of organic matter present in the substrate [20]. Fungi have also been explored as substrates in MFCs to assess their potential. For instance, Abdallah et al. (2019) utilized the fungus Aspergillus sydowii and banana waste as substrates, resulting in the generation of 0.76 V and a power density of 160 mW/m2 [21].
For the improvement of MFCs, different types of microorganisms have been used as biocatalysts for various applications, such as reducing toxic heavy metals and eliminating toxic dyes in wastewater, while generating electrical energy [22]. The literature mentions that in the last ten years, fungi without mediators have begun to be used, observing the tremendous electrogenic potential of these microorganisms [23]. These fungi produce short-lived electroactive compounds that act as mediators, helping to generate energy. In addition, by involving redox enzymes in the fungal cell walls, electrons can be transmitted directly [24]. One of the fungi that are characterized by biodegrading plastic is the fungus Aspergillus sp. Because the cutinases they produce as subclasses of esterase enzymes can hydrolyze polyesters with high molar mass, breaking the chains of carboxylic esters [25,26]. There are reports that the fungus Aspergillus sp. Has managed to penetrate polymeric structures through its hyphae and degrade PET (polyethylene terephthalate) foams [27].
This research observed the potential of the fungus Aspergillus to impressively and simultaneously reduce a plastic sample and obtain electrical energy through microbial fuel cells at a laboratory scale over 45 days. The values of electrical conductivity, electric current, pH, voltage, chemical oxygen demand, current density, power density, and internal resistance were monitored during the operation period of the MFCs. The plastic sample in its initial and final state was measured through FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) and SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) to observe the transmittance spectrum and micrographs of the samples. The research presents a sustainable, innovative, and highly environmentally friendly way of using microbial fuel cells and fungi, as they can generate electrical energy and reduce plastic waste efficiently and economically.

2. Materials and Methods

a.
Design and assembly of MFCs
Single-chamber MFCs were obtained from Xin Tester (Shanghai, China, volume 100 mL). The electrode materials used were activated carbon (AC) and zinc (Zn) as anode and cathode, whose areas were 26.5 and 22 cm2, respectively. An external resistor of 100 Ω was used for the external circuit, which was connected to a 0.5 mm thick copper wire and with Nafion as separated between the chambers (see Figure 1).
b.
Electrochemical and morphological tests.
A Truper multimeter (MUT-830 Digital Multimeter) was used to monitor the current (I) and voltage (V) values of the MFCs. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) values were determined using the closed reflux colorimetric method (NTP standard 360.502:2016) [28]. The internal resistance of the MFC was calculated using Ohm’s law and an energy sensor (Vernier- ±30 V and ±1000 mA). Segundo et al.’s method determined the values of power density (PD) and current density (CD) (2024) using external resistors of 0.2 (±0.05), 5 (±0.50), 20 (±2.4), 50 (±6.52), 120 (±10.55), 240 (±15.62), 480 (±20.64), 520 (±30.88), 780 (±50.75), and 1000 (±60.55) Ω [28]. Micrographs of the plastics were taken using SEM (TESCAN USA, Tallahassee, FL, USA). Fourier measured transmittance spectra of the plastic films with transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Thermo Scientific IS50, Austin, TX, USA).
c.
Collection of samples, isolation, and selection of Aspergillus sp.
The plastic remains used as samples were obtained from the municipal landfill of the El Milagro population center, Trujillo, Peru; they were placed in sterile containers and labeled for transport to the Cesar Vallejo University laboratory. Small fragments of the plastic sample were placed in tubes with 10 mL of Sterile Physiological Saline Solution (SSFS), from which 100 µL of the suspension was extracted and surface-sown on plates with potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with Chloramphenicol. These plates were incubated at 28 °C for five days [29]. Then, the fungi were replicated in PDA for identification by comparing their morphology and fungal structure with the taxonomic keys of Barnett S. A.’s guide (1972) [30], as shown in Figure 2.
d.
Microbial fuel cell operation
The experiment was performed in a single-chamber Microbial Combustion Cell (MFC), in which the sterile substrate and the Aspergillus sp. Fungus were placed. The substrate was sterilized in an autoclave before being used and consisted of 80% of minimal salt medium and 20% of potato broth; the inoculum was composed of 4 fractions of the Aspergillus sp. Culture (5 mm in diameter) [31]. With the components ready for use and in sterile conditions, the sterile substrate, the microbial inoculum, and a 1.5 × 1.5 cm sheet of low-density polyethylene were placed inside the MFC.

3. Results and Analysis

The data presented in Figure 3a show the voltage data over time. Voltage started at 0.039 ± 0.001 V on day 4 and peaked at 0.572 ± 0.024 V on day 31 before gradually decreasing to 0.431 ± 0.032 V by day 45. The initial voltage increase is mainly attributed to oxidation reactions in the anodic chamber and reduction in the cathodic chamber. As Zhao et al. (2019) explain, these reactions create a potential difference that peaks as the chemical compounds are used up, resulting in a decrease in voltage. In similar systems, peak voltages of 0.38 V can be achieved, with the redox potential attributed to the crucial activity of fungal redox enzymes, such as laccase (enzymes), which oxidize aromatic phenolic compounds and amines, and play a significant role in the process, impressively contributing to the generation of peak voltages [32]. Other study also revealed that the fungus Irpex lacteus can reach peaks of 0.35 V, highlighting the superior redox potential of fungal laccase compared to bacterial laccase. Furthermore, Aspergillus, a filamentous fungus, shows significant biotechnological potential for the industrial production of chemical products [33]. Monitoring of the electric current showed that the values increased from day 4 (0.105 ± 0.084 mA) progressively until day 31 with a maximum value of 3.608 ± 0.249 mA, and then decreased in the current values until day 45 (2.562 ± 0.291 mA). The electric current values are caused by the release of electrons by the fungus Aspergillus sp. These electrons are captured by the anodic electrode and transported to the cathode. The delay in the increase in current values for four days is due to the acclimatization time of the fungus and the formation of the mediating biofilm. The fungus Psathyrella candolleana is used as a substrate in the MFC, and the generated electrons come from the organic content of the native microflora. This microflora is responsible for transferring the electrons to the surface of the electrode, leading to an increase in current values in the initial days. At the same time, the COD is reduced due to the activity of the microflora. Thulasinathan et al. (2024) used the fungus T. harzianum and a biodegradable crystal violet, mentioning that the ability to biodegrade some substances depends on each fungus and its compatibility [34]. It is crucial to note that electron production and energy generation are not always directly proportional. They depend on the resistance of the MFCs, a complex system that plays a significant role in their operation [35].
The pH values increased progressively from day 1 from a slightly acidic region to the last day to a slightly alkaline region, with the optimum operating pH value being 6.57 ± 0.27 on day 31 (Figure 4a). The performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is greatly influenced by the proliferation of microorganisms at standard pH levels. Tiwari et al. (2021) highlighted in their research that pH variations can affect proton transmission to the cathode, leading to a decrease in oxygen reactions and subsequently reducing the electrical output of the MFC [36]. Certain bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter Schindler, and Pseudomonas, have been utilized as biocatalysts in MFCs, generating peak I and V of 0.110 mA and 110 mV, respectively, when operating at a pH of 7 [37]. These findings represent a novel approach in the field of microbiology and biochemistry. Additionally, Lysinibacillus xylanolytic has been used as a substrate in H-type MFCs, resulting in a peak voltage of 1127 mV using aluminum and graphite electrodes [38]. The electrical conductivity values (Figure 4b) showed a similar behavior to that reported in Figure 3a,b. On the first day, the values increased from 50.60 ± 1.03 mS/cm until day 31 with a value of 257.12 ± 20.9 mS/cm and then decreased until day 45 with 207.40 ± 4.16 mS/cm. The literature indicates that the initial increase in electrical conductivity values is attributed to the significant release of ions resulting from numerous redox reactions. Over time, this trend gradually decreases until the final day [39,40]. The high electrical conductivity explains the high current and voltage values produced in Figure 2 because the anodic electrode had greater freedom to move and capture the electrons. Figure 4c shows the values of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) recorded in the MFCs, where a decrease of 73.77% is observed concerning the values recorded on the first day (756.86 mg/L) and the last day (198.54 ± 38.95 mg/L); the most significant reduction of the COD is observed in the first 30 days (59.16%). The initial thirty days saw the most significant decrease in organic matter, indicating the high metabolic activity of the fungus Aspergillus sp. This early activity in the MFCs resulted in the highest electric current values; similar behavior was observed with the fungus Aspergillus niger in MFCs, which managed to reduce COD values by 77.9% and generate 0.814 V [41]. Research by Kongthale et al. (2023) showed that yeast strains used in winery wastewater produced maximum voltages of 219.33 ± 6.43 mV and simultaneously reduced COD values by 79.14 ± 0.92% [42]. These findings have important implications for the practical application of MFCs in areas such as bioenergy and environmental science.
On day 31, the maximum power density values observed were 0.124 ± 0.006 mW/cm2 at a current density of 5.201 mA/cm2 with a voltage of 530.619 ± 25.155 mV (refer to Figure 5a). According to Andirukonis et al. (2021), one crucial factor for achieving good power density results is the adhesion of microorganisms on the surface of the anodic electrode, as it plays a vital role in electron transfer [43]. Also, the literature has reported that the designs used in MFCs are influential in the power density efficiency and that marine sludge has excellent potential as a biocatalyst [44]. Rhizobium anhuiense bacteria has been used as a substrate in MFC, achieving power density peaks of 4.93 mW/cm2, where the authors mention that redox mediators in the proton exchange membrane influence the power density results [45]. Žalnėravičius et al. (2022) also used Rhizobium anhuiense bacteria as a substrate in MFCs, generating a power density of 4.93 mW/cm2 when operating at pH 7, and observed that by introducing glucose, the power density values improved significantly [46]. Figure 5b shows the internal resistance calculated using Ohm’s Law, achieving an internal resistance of 27.417 ± 9.810 Ω on day 31. In their research, Islam et al. (2020) emphasized the collaborative nature of understanding the internal resistance of MFCs, where the resistance is influenced by the biofilm formed and has adhered to the anodic electrode and the synergism between the microorganisms in the substrate [47]. Considering various factors such as the MFCs’ geometry, the electrodes’ structure, the substrate used, and the diffusion rate of protons and electrons is crucial for this collaborative effort [48]. Bhatt et al. (2024) contributed to this collective knowledge by using the fungus Aspergillus niger in their research. They demonstrated how variations in resistance values can impact power density. Additionally, they noted that high resistance values can impede electron flow, thereby reducing the electric current of the MFCs [49].
The initial and final FTIR transmittance spectra are shown in Figure 6, where characteristic plastic peaks are observed. The peak at 3405 cm−1 shows the stretching of the OH group, the vibration bands between 2844 and 2919 cm−1 belong to the C-H compounds of the aliphatic group, while the peak at 1646 cm−1 is characteristic of the stretching of the C=O group, and the bands of the peak at 1477 cm−1 show the existence of the COO- groups and the peak at the wavelength 723 cm−1 belongs to the stretching of the C=C group [50,51]. It has been observed that the initial peaks of the spectra decreased in intensity. Previous studies have shown that the fungus Aspergillus can reduce plastic waste by covering the plastic with degradative enzymes and using polyethylene for growth. This demonstrates the fungus’s ability to break down plastic [52]. The fungus Aspergillus is capable of producing hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes and adheres well to plastic substrates [53]. The initial and final micrographs are shown in Figure 7, where a smooth surface without imperfections is shown with an initial thickness of the sample of 751.46 µm. The latest micrograph reveals a surface with irregular porous structures, indicating the strong activity of the fungus Aspergillus. The final thickness is only 437.90 µm, which shows a significant reduction of 313.56 µm. This is a groundbreaking discovery, as it suggests that these irregular structures are formed directly as a result of the activity of the fungal hyphae. These hyphae create a biofilm on the plastic surface, causing streaks and penetrations in the plastic waste. This discovery brings to light the potential damage caused by the fungus Aspergillus and its role in degrading plastic waste [26,54,55].

4. Conclusions

The research results were successful, indicating that the fungus Aspergillus sp. effectively generates electrical energy and reduces plastic waste simultaneously through laboratory-scale microbial fuel cells for 45 days of operation. Maximum values of electric current and voltage were generated on day 31, with values of 3.608 ± 0.249 mA and 0.572 ± 0.024 V. On this day, the substrate showed a pH of 6.57 ± 0.27 and an electrical conductivity of 257.12 ± 20.9 mS/cm. The chemical oxygen demand (BOD) was also reduced by 73.77% from 756.85 mg/L to 198.54 ± 38.95 mg/L. The maximum power density shown on day 31 was 0.124 ± 0.006 mW/cm2 with an internal resistance of the MFC of 27.417 ± 9.810 Ω. In addition, the initial and final FTIR spectra showed the characteristic peaks of the plastic (polyethylene), observing a significant reduction in the final peaks. The peaks that suffered the most significant reduction were 2844 and 2919 cm−1 of the C-H compound, indicating a substantial degradation of the plastic. Finally, the final micrographs showed deformations and perforations on the surface of the plastic used as a substrate, reducing the plastic’s thickness by 313.56 µm.
This research, the first of its kind, holds the potential to revolutionize the fields of microbiology, environmental science, and renewable energy. The successful use of Aspergillus sp. in generating electrical energy and reducing plastic waste simultaneously in MFCs is a significant step forward. The need for standardization of parameters is a clear call to action, emphasizing the importance of ongoing research and development in these areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.-F.; methodology, L.C.-C.; validation, N.M.O. and; formal analysis, S.R.-F. and M.D.L.C.-N.; investigation, S.R.-F.; data curation, M.D.L.C.-N.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.-C.; writing—review and editing, S.R.-F.; project administration, S.R.-F. and L.C.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been financed by the Universidad Cesar Vallejo, project code No. P-2023-113.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, H.; Wan, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Waste to wealth: Chemical recycling and chemical upcycling of waste plastics for a great future. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 4123–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, K.; Jing, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, N. A unified view on catalytic conversion of biomass and waste plastics. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022, 6, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ma, Y.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, X.; Polaczyk, P.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, M.; Huang, B. The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: A review. Clean. Mater. 2021, 2, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, S.; Han, Z.; Yuan, K.; Qin, P.; Zhao, W.; Lin, T.; Zhou, T.; Huang, F. Upcycling chlorinated waste plastics. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2023, 3, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.T.; Shah, I.A.; Hossain, M.F.; Akther, N.; Zhou, Y.; Khan, M.S.; Al-Shaeli, M.; Bacha, M.S.; Ihsanullah, I. Personal protective equipment (PPE) disposal during COVID-19: An emerging source of microplastic and microfiber pollution in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 860, 160322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ihsanullah, I.; Khan, M.T.; Hossain, M.F.; Bilal, M.; Ali Shah, I. Eco-Friendly Solutions to Emerging Contaminants: Unveiling the Potential of Bioremediation in Tackling Microplastic Pollution in Water. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2024, 2400172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kalak, T. Potential use of industrial biomass waste as a sustainable energy source in the future. Energies 2023, 16, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martinez, V.; Stolar, T.; Karadeniz, B.; Brekalo, I.; Užarević, K. Advancing mechanochemical synthesis by combining milling with different energy sources. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2023, 7, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, X.H.; Tee, K.; Elnahass, M.; Ahmed, R. Assessing the environmental impacts of renewable energy sources: A case study on air pollution and carbon emissions in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Algarni, S.; Tirth, V.; Alqahtani, T.; Alshehery, S.; Kshirsagar, P. Contribution of renewable energy sources to the environmental impacts and economic benefits for sustainable development. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ibrahim, O.; Bakare, M.S.; Amosa, T.I.; Otuoze, A.O.; Owonikoko, W.O.; Ali, E.M.; Adesina, L.M.; Ogunbiyi, O. Development of fuzzy logic-based demand-side energy management system for hybrid energy sources. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2023, 18, 100354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tan, J.; Wang, X.; Chu, W.; Fang, S.; Zheng, C.; Xue, M.; Wang, X.; Hu, T.; Guo, W. Harvesting energy from atmospheric water: Grand challenges in continuous electricity generation. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2211165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tian, X.; An, C.; Chen, Z. The role of clean energy in achieving decarbonization of electricity generation, transportation, and heating sectors by 2050: A meta-analysis review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 182, 113404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shao, B.; Song, Y.; Song, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R.; Sun, B. Electricity generation from phase transitions between liquid and gaseous water. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2204091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sonawane, A.V.; Rikame, S.; Sonawane, S.H.; Gaikwad, M.; Bhanvase, B.; Sonawane, S.S.; Mungray, A.K.; Gaikwad, R. A review of microbial fuel cell and its diversification in the development of green energy technology. Chemosphere 2024, 350, 141127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kunwar, S.; Pandey, N.; Bhatnagar, P.; Chadha, G.; Rawat, N.; Joshi, N.C.; Tomar, M.S.; Eyvaz, M.; Gururani, P. A concise review on wastewater treatment through microbial fuel cell: Sustainable and holistic approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 6723–6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Daud, S.M.; Noor, Z.Z.; Mutamim, N.S.A.; Baharuddin, N.H.; Aris, A.; Faizal, A.N.M.; Ibrahim, R.S.; Suhaimin, N.S. A critical review of ceramic microbial fuel cell: Economics, long-term operation, scale-up, performances and challenges. Fuel 2024, 365, 131150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jalili, P.; Ala, A.; Nazari, P.; Jalili, B.; Ganji, D.D. A comprehensive review of microbial fuel cells considering materials, methods, structures, and microorganisms. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rincón-Catalán, N.I.; Cruz-Salomón, A.; Sebastian, P.J.; Pérez-Fabiel, S.; Hernández-Cruz, M.D.C.; Sánchez-Albores, R.M.; Hernández-Méndez, J.M.E.; Domínguez-Espinosa, M.E.; Esquinca-Avilés, H.A.; Ríos-Valdovinos, E.I.; et al. Banana Waste-to-Energy Valorization by Microbial Fuel Cell Coupled with Anaerobic Digestion. Processes 2022, 10, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agudelo-Escobar, L.M.; Cabrera, S.E.; Avignone Rossa, C. A bioelectrochemical system for waste degradation and energy recovery from industrial coffee wastewater. Front. Chem. Eng. 2022, 4, 814987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdallah, Y.K.; Estevez, A.T.; Tantawy, D.E.D.M.; Ibraheem, A.M.; Khalil, N.M. Employing laccase-producing Aspergillus sydowii NYKA 510 as a cathodic biocatalyst in self-sufficient lighting microbial fuel cell. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 1861–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tanaka, F.; Xie, L.; Ishii, Y.; Kawasaki, S.; Yoshida, N. Anode biomass rather than soluble organic matter is fuel for electricity production in microbial fuel cell at longer hydraulic retention time. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 439, 140544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pal, M.; Sharma, R.K. Development of wheat straw based catholyte for power generation in microbial fuel cell. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 138, 105591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarma, H.; Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jadhav, D.A.; Pawar, P.; Thakare, M.; Pandit, S.; Mathuriya, A.S.; Prasad, R. Fungal-mediated electrochemical system: Prospects, applications and challenges. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Srikanth, M.; Sandeep, T.S.R.S.; Sucharitha, K.; Godi, S. Biodegradation of plastic polymers by fungi: A brief review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2022, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Safdar, A.; Ismail, F.; Imran, M. Biodegradation of synthetic plastics by the extracellular lipase of Aspergillus niger. Environ. Adv. 2024, 17, 100563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ekanayaka, A.H.; Tibpromma, S.; Dai, D.; Xu, R.; Suwannarach, N.; Stephenson, S.L.; Dao, C.; Karunarathna, S.C. A review of the fungi that degrade plastic. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Segundo, R.F.; Magaly, D.L.C.N.; Luis, C.C.; Luis, N.M.; Soto-Deza, N.; Terrones-Rodriguez, N.; Mayra, D.L.C.C. Obtaining Sustainable Electrical Energy from Pepper Waste. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumari, A.; Pawar, D.; Saini, S.; Kumar, A.; Budhwar, S.; Sharma, S.P. Challenges in Biodegradation of Plastic Waste from Food Packaging. In Advances in Sustainable Food Packaging Technology; Apple Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 251–269. [Google Scholar]
  30. Barnett, S.A. Homo docens. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1973, 5, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, Y.; Yin, Y.; Ni, Z.; Liu, J.; Gui, H.; Wu, D.; Wu, X.; Wang, L. The effective and green biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the screening of a strain with its degrading enzymes. Biochem. Eng. J. 2024, 210, 109429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Weng, L.; Ren, T.; Li, Y. Shifting interactions among bacteria, fungi and archaea enhance removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in the soil bioelectrochemical remediation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Noori, M.T.; Jain, S.C.; Ghangrekar, M.M.; Mukherjee, C.K. Biofouling inhibition and enhancing performance of microbial fuel cell using silver nano-particles as fungicide and cathode catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 220, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thulasinathan, B.; Jayabalan, T.; Sethupathi, M.; Kim, W.; Muniyasamy, S.; Sengottuvelan, N.; Nainamohamed, S.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Alagarsamy, A. Bioelectricity generation by natural microflora of septic tank wastewater (STWW) and biodegradation of persistent petrogenic pollutants by basidiomycetes fungi: An integrated microbial fuel cell system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Votat, S.; Pontié, M.; Jaspard, E.; Lebrun, L. Crystal Violet (CV) Biodegradation Study in a Dual-Chamber Fungal Microbial Fuel Cell with Trichoderma harzianum. Energies 2024, 17, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tiwari, S.; Koreti, D.; Kosre, A.; Mahish, P.K.; Jadhav, S.K.; Chandrawanshi, N.K. Fungal Microbial Fuel Cells, an Opportunity for Energy Sources: Current Perspective and Future Challenges. Energy Crises Chall. Solut. 2021, 250–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yaakop, A.S.; Ahmad, A.; Hussain, F.; Oh, S.E.; Alshammari, M.B.; Chauhan, R. Domestic Organic Waste: A Potential Source to Produce the Energy via a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 2023, 2425735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pan, P.; Bhattacharyya, N. Bioelectricity production from microbial fuel cell (MFC) using Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus strain nbpp1 as a biocatalyst. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Garbini, G.L.; Barra Caracciolo, A.; Grenni, P. Electroactive bacteria in natural ecosystems and their applications in microbial fuel cells for bioremediation: A review. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meylani, V.; Surahman, E.; Fudholi, A.; Almalki, W.H.; Ilyas, N.; Sayyed, R.Z. Biodiversity in microbial fuel cells: Review of a promising technology for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mahmoud, M.S.; Wang, J.H.; Shen, Y.; Guo, Z.W.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, D.C.; Peters, R.W.; Mostafa, M.K.; Mahmoud, A.S. Performance of the Dual-Chamber Fungal Fuel Cell in Treating Tannery Wastewater. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kongthale, G.; Sotha, S.; Michu, P.; Madloh, A.; Wetchapan, P.; Chaijak, P. Electricity production and phenol removal of winery wastewater by constructed wetland—Microbial fuel cell integrated with ethanol tolerant yeast. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2023, 13, 157. [Google Scholar]
  43. Andriukonis, E.; Celiesiute-Germaniene, R.; Ramanavicius, S.; Viter, R.; Ramanavicius, A. From microorganism-based amperometric biosensors towards microbial fuel cells. Sensors 2021, 21, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Srivastava, R.K.; Boddula, R.; Pothu, R. Microbial fuel cells: Technologically advanced devices and approach for sustainable/renewable energy development. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 13, 100160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rafaqat, S. Development of Fungal Biocathode Based Microbial Fuel Cell and Laccase-Based Biosensor for Biodegradation and Detection of Chlorpyrifos Organophosphate. Ph.D. Thesis, Quaid I Azam University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  46. Žalnėravičius, R.; Paškevičius, A.; Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U.; Ramanavičius, S.; Vilkienė, M.; Mockevičienė, I.; Ramanavičius, A. Microbial fuel cell based on nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium anhuiense bacteria. Biosensors 2022, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Islam, M.A.; Karim, A.; Mishra, P.; Dubowski, J.J.; Yousuf, A.; Sarmin, S.; Khan, M.M.R. Microbial synergistic interactions enhanced power generation in co-culture driven microbial fuel cell. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 140138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ballestas, E.R.; Bortoluzzi, E.C.; Minervino, A.H.H.; Palma, H.H.; Neckel, A.; Ramos, C.G.; Moreno-Ríos, A.L. Power generation potential of plant microbial fuel cells as a renewable energy source. Renew. Energy 2024, 221, 119799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bhatt, P.; Paudel, P.; Regmi, D.; Soni, S.; Dhungana, P.; Joshi, J. Degradation of potato peels using amylase-and pectinase-producing fungal strain in an electrochemical cell and by-product analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2024, 43, 2345735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nasrabadi, A.E.; Ramavandi, B.; Bonyadi, Z. Recent progress in biodegradation of microplastics by Aspergillus sp. in aquatic environments. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2023, 57, 100754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Palanivel, T.M.; Pracejus, B.; Novo, L.A. Bioremediation of copper using indigenous fungi Aspergillus species isolated from an abandoned copper mine soil. Chemosphere 2023, 314, 137688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Munir, E.; Harefa, R.S.M.; Priyani, N.; Suryanto, D. Plastic degrading fungi Trichoderma viride and Aspergillus nomius isolated from local landfill soil in Medan. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 126, 012145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Raaman, N.; Rajitha, N.; Jayshree, A.; Jegadeesh, R. Biodegradation of plastic by Aspergillus spp. isolated from polythene polluted sites around Chennai. J. Acad. Ind. Res. 2012, 1, 313–316. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mathur, G.; Mathur, A.; Prasad, R. Colonization and degradation of thermally oxidized high-density polyethylene by Aspergillus niger (ITCC No. 6052) isolated from plastic waste dumpsite. Bioremediation J. 2011, 15, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. El-Dash, H.A.; Yousef, N.E.; Aboelazm, A.A.; Awan, Z.A.; Yahya, G.; El-Ganiny, A.M. Optimizing eco-friendly degradation of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic using environmental strains of Malassezia species and Aspergillus fumigatus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of the MFC with the substrate of potato broth and Aspergillus sp.
Figure 1. Schematic of the MFC with the substrate of potato broth and Aspergillus sp.
Sustainability 16 07413 g001
Figure 2. Microscopic image of the fungus Aspergillus sp.
Figure 2. Microscopic image of the fungus Aspergillus sp.
Sustainability 16 07413 g002
Figure 3. Report on monitoring the values of (a) voltage and (b) electric current.
Figure 3. Report on monitoring the values of (a) voltage and (b) electric current.
Sustainability 16 07413 g003
Figure 4. Parameters shown for (a) pH, (b) conductivity, and (c) COD.
Figure 4. Parameters shown for (a) pH, (b) conductivity, and (c) COD.
Sustainability 16 07413 g004
Figure 5. Values of (a) power density as a function of current density and (b) internal resistance.
Figure 5. Values of (a) power density as a function of current density and (b) internal resistance.
Sustainability 16 07413 g005
Figure 6. FTIR spectrum of the plastic samples in initial and final states.
Figure 6. FTIR spectrum of the plastic samples in initial and final states.
Sustainability 16 07413 g006
Figure 7. Micrographs of the plastic samples in their (a) initial and (b) final state after 45 days.
Figure 7. Micrographs of the plastic samples in their (a) initial and (b) final state after 45 days.
Sustainability 16 07413 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rojas-Flores, S.; De La Cruz-Noriega, M.; Otiniano, N.M.; Cabanillas-Chirinos, L. Sustainable Use of the Fungus Aspergillus sp. to Simultaneously Generate Electricity and Reduce Plastic through Microbial Fuel Cells. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177413

AMA Style

Rojas-Flores S, De La Cruz-Noriega M, Otiniano NM, Cabanillas-Chirinos L. Sustainable Use of the Fungus Aspergillus sp. to Simultaneously Generate Electricity and Reduce Plastic through Microbial Fuel Cells. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rojas-Flores, Segundo, Magaly De La Cruz-Noriega, Nélida Milly Otiniano, and Luis Cabanillas-Chirinos. 2024. "Sustainable Use of the Fungus Aspergillus sp. to Simultaneously Generate Electricity and Reduce Plastic through Microbial Fuel Cells" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop