Next Article in Journal
Are Magnesium Alloys Applied in Cars Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly? A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Electric Vehicle Patent Trends through Technology Life Cycle and Social Network Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Strategies in Controlling Aspergillus flavus and Aflatoxins in Grains during Storage: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Optimal Zoning of Non-Grain-Producing Cultivated Land Consolidation Potential: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District

1
School of Art and Design, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
2
College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
3
Chengdu Land Consolidation and Ecological Rehabilitation Center, Chengdu 610031, China
4
Chengdu Park City Construction and Development Research Institute, Chengdu 610036, China
5
Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu 610036, China
6
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
7
College of Art, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China
8
Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan 430100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7798; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177798
Submission received: 12 July 2024 / Revised: 29 August 2024 / Accepted: 30 August 2024 / Published: 6 September 2024

Abstract

:
Non-grain-producing cultivated land (NGPCL) greatly affects sustainable agricultural development and food security, and its consolidation is important. With the Dujiangyan irrigation district as an example, an empirical study of NGPCL consolidation zoning was performed following the idea of “connotation definition and classification—potential identification—consolidation zoning”. On the basis of expert evaluation, NGPCL was classified into three levels according to the degree of damage to cultivated land by crop type. NGPCL was common in the study area, accounting for 53.8% of the total area. The spatial pattern of NGPCL was characterized as “continuous in the south and scattered in the north”. The assessment of theoretical and realistic NGPCL consolidation potentials suggested that areas with medium consolidation potential exhibited a contiguous distribution in the southern part of the study area, whereas it was dispersed in other regions. The proportion of area suitable for consolidation exceeded 40%. Finally, through a multiobjective optimization algorithm, a potential zoning scheme for NGPCL consolidation was constructed. The final experimental results revealed that the areas with medium or high consolidation potential accounted for 97.54% of the total area. This study is useful for supporting the governance of NGPCL.

1. Introduction

Food security is crucial for people’s livelihoods, and the conservation of cultivated land is directly linked to sustainable food production. According to the latest report on the global food crisis by the United Nations World Food Program in May 2023, approximately 258 million people in 58 countries and regions are currently experiencing severe food insecurity [1]. In the context of rapid urbanization, limited space for grain output growth, farming conditions, and land use scale have become the main factors restricting agricultural development and threatening food security [2]. How can cultivated areas be improved to ensure food security and promote the sustainable development of agriculture? This is a serious challenge facing both developed and developing countries.
In international practice, legislation and rigorous law enforcement serve as fundamental safeguards for cultivated land, while achieving a balance of interests through administrative intervention is an essential measure for planning and safeguarding basic farmland [3,4]. Countries such as the United States and the Netherlands delineate urban boundaries and agricultural protected areas through urban development control planning [5]. This approach is combined with land consolidation to adjust the land ownership pattern and scale to protect cultivated land [6]. In recent years, driven by social development and economic interests, there has been a significant increase in the large-scale substitution of grain cultivation with high-yield economic production methods (such as forestry, fruit production, pond excavation, and aquaculture), known as the establishment of non-grain-producing cultivated land (NGPCL). This trend is due primarily to the high costs, low income levels, and high risks associated with traditional grain cultivation [7]. Although NGPCL diversifies agricultural production types and exerts a positive impact on the economy overall, an increase in NGPCL ratios along with certain NGPCL types may lead to detrimental effects on cultivated land productivity, particularly topsoil layer destruction and aggravated agricultural pollution [8]. In contrast to the strict prohibition by various governments on non-agricultural activities and other irreversible damage to cultivated land [9], NGPCL has gained widespread adoption in many countries because of its substantial economic benefits and potential reversibility for food production purposes [10,11,12]. China is presently implementing its strictest protection system for cultivated lands in combination with a “land use control institution” approach. From 2014 to 2023, China’s No. 1 Central Document consistently underscored the necessity of addressing NGPCL to ensure stable grain production levels while preserving sown areas [13,14]. The prevention of NGPCL formation has become an important issue related to food security and agricultural modernization in China and has received much attention.
Given the gravity of these issues, numerous scholars have researched NGPCL, such as its identification, classification, evaluation, and optimization. In terms of NGPCL identification, large-scale studies are typically based on surveys and statistical yearbooks. Various indicators, such as the ratio of the NGPCL planting area to the total sown crop or total cultivated land area, the ratio of grain income to total agricultural income, and the ratio of the number of grain farmers to large farming households, are typically utilized to analyze NGPCL trends [15,16,17]. Among these indicators, the ratio of the NGPCL planted area to the total cultivated area has been widely applied [15]. However, these measurement methods are generally applied at the level of large-scale administrative divisions of provinces and cities, ignoring the differences in NGPCL at the local and regional scales, as well as differences in NGPCL types [17,18]. Additionally, some researchers have used remote sensing data to identify planting types and temporal/spatial changes in local cultivated land spaces while analyzing the NGPCL spatial pattern [18,19,20,21] to quantify NGPCL trends.
According to existing research on NGPCL classification, some scholars have classified NGPCL into three categories that differ from food crop production in terms of crop planting type [22,23], farming structure [24,25], and production mode [20]. Other researchers have classified cultivated land as paddy field dry farming, economic fruit tree planting, economic tree planting, or pond digging for aquaculture [26]. Notably, in China’s “National Technical Consolidations for the Verification of the Results of the Third National Land Survey”, the attributes of the current status of cultivated land were noted as “can be restored” or “engineering restoration” [27]. This has become the mainstream practice for the classification of existing NGPCL.
However, simply analyzing the NGPCL governance path on the basis of the spatial pattern revealed by identification efforts can no longer meet the actual needs of management departments. Therefore, determining how to manage NGPCL and realize the sustainable development of rural areas is highly practical. At present, there are still some gaps in the consolidation research on NGPCL. Considering that the premise of NGPCL governance is to clarify its consolidation potential [28], an evaluation and optimization of NGPCL are performed in combination with the research concept of land consolidation potential [29,30]. In previous studies of land consolidation potential, the following three mainstream methods were used. First, the gap between the theoretical and actual productivity of cultivated land was used to represent the potential of cultivated land consolidation [31,32]. Second, based on the technical methods of cultivated land quality grade assessment, the quality grade and area of cultivated land were calculated, and potential improvements were recommended [33]. However, the abovementioned methods of assessing the cultivated land consolidation potential are relatively mature. Moreover, in terms of calculation results, cultivated land productivity and cultivated land quality grades after regulation often reach the ideal state according to indicators [34]. The actual production conditions and social and economic conditions are not fully considered, which may result in inaccurate grades. Third, cultivated land suitability and multifunctional evaluation methods have been adopted to determine the area of cultivated land that can be regulated on the basis of the results of cultivated land function and suitability evaluations [35,36,37]. Most studies of cultivated land suitability are based on natural factors such as climate, terrain conditions, and soil conditions (the thickness of the effective soil layer, surface soil texture, soil organic matter content, soil pH value, etc.), and few researchers have considered the ecological environment or social and economic factors [38,39]. Other researchers have proposed optimization objectives related to economic benefits, ecological benefits, and land compactness with the help of multiobjective optimization algorithms (MOOAs) and explored optimal consolidation plans when all objectives are achieved [40]. However, such studies often use land type merging, contiguous analysis, and other means to estimate patterns regarding the regulation of cultivated land, but these methods are focused mostly on promoting the establishment of contiguous cultivated land in a single direction [41,42], and in-depth discussions of the quantity, quality, and consolidation cost of cultivated land resources are lacking. In another study, an intention survey was employed to analyze the promotional impact of introducing a public participation mechanism during the stage of land consolidation and planning preparation, aiming to ensure land protection and enhance land planning [42,43]. However, such research is still independent and has not been included in formal NGPCL evaluation systems [42]. Other research on cultivated land regulation strategies has resulted in the proposal of various measures to promote rehabilitation, such as strengthening the management of cultivated land use, improving the land transfer market, and increasing grain subsidies [44]. Most of these measures fall within the “one-size-fits-all” category, ignoring the differences in the management of cultivated land of various types in different spaces.
In conclusion, the primary objectives of NGPCL assessment are to expand the effective cultivated land area, increase the agricultural production efficiency, and ensure food security. Considering that there are still knowledge gaps in the existing research on the assessment and remediation of NGPCL in terms of definition, classification, and identification of such land, as well as the selection of remediation indicators, a new approach is needed; specifically, this approach must be applicable at the village and town scales, which were rarely considered in previous studies. In this study, the methods for potential NGPCL consolidation are assessed, aiming to establish a scientific foundation for understanding NPGCL issues and consolidation strategies while also offering guidance for other countries at similar stages of development worldwide. The specific objectives are as follows:
(1)
Understanding NGPCL of various types;
(2)
Identifying the status quo and spatial pattern of NGPCL;
(3)
Assessing the NGPCL consolidation potential;
(4)
Exploring the governance of NGPCL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Dujiangyan city is a county-level city in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, named after the world-famous Dujiangyan Water Conservancy Project. The irrigation system that extends from the Dujiangyan Water Conservancy Project covers an area of more than 7100 km2, and this area has become the main grain-producing area of Sichuan, China. The research area is located at the source of the Dujiangyan Water Conservancy Project (latitude 30°44′–31°02′ N, longitude 103°0–103°47′ E) and covers an area of approximately 254 km2 (the cultivated land area is approximately 179.92 km2). The terrain in the area is flat, the slope is low, and the average altitude is approximately 600 m (Figure 1).
In the cultivated land areas in the study region, the main crop types are rice, wheat, corn, soybean, and potato. However, with the advance of urbanization, the proportion of food crops in the gross regional product has fallen below 8%. The types of NGPCL in the study area are mainly seedling planting, fruit planting (Actinidia chinensis Planch., Vitis vinifera L., etc.), the cultivation of medicinal materials (Ligusticum sinense “Chuanxiong”, etc.), and aquaculture (Oncorhynchus mykiss, etc.). The seedling planting area is wide and covers a large area, and it is connected to the adjacent Wenjiang District and Pidu District (the administrative region under the jurisdiction of Chengdu), forming an industrial cluster with a planting area of more than 700 km2, which is the largest seedling planting area in Southwest China. Therefore, as a typical representation of NGPCL in Southwest China, this region is selected as the study area of NGPCL governance, which can provide a reference for other NGPCL governance cases in China and even worldwide.

2.2. Data Sources

The data sources used in this study included network open data, planning data, and survey data.
The network open data were as follows: (1) Remote sensing images were obtained from the geospatial Data Cloud Platform (http://www.gscloud.cn/ (accessed on 8 July 2021)). The Landsat 8 OLI-TIRS image (scene No. 129-039) obtained on 28 July 2020, when plant growth was observable and cloud cover was low, was selected as the interpretation data source and was mainly used for processing and analysis to determine the current land use type. (2) Digital elevation model (DEM) data from the geospatial Data Cloud Platform (http://www.gscloud.cn/ (accessed on 6 July 2021)) were used mainly for the calculation of topographic-related indicators. (3) Open street map (OSM) data from the Open Street Map website (https://www.openstreetmap.org/ (accessed on 25 November 2020)) were used. The following data were employed for location and road index analysis: (4) the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), with data obtained from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Resources and Environment Data Service Center (http://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx (accessed on 8 October 2021)), was used, mainly to represent the regional vegetation coverage.
Planning data, such as the quality of cultivated land resources, water system maps, and related planning documents for Dujiangyan, were obtained from the Chengdu Land Consolidation and Ecological Rehabilitation Center and the Dujiangyan Irrigation District Management Committee and were mainly used for the index-based analysis of cultivated land and water areas.
The survey data included NGPCL classifications (for details, see Appendix A Questionnaire A1), realistic consolidation condition weights (for details, see Appendix A Table A1), social intentions (for details, see Appendix A Questionnaire A2), etc. The first two datasets were obtained in April 2024 through consultation with experts in relevant fields. Considering the importance of public participation in farmland protection, a survey of the willingness of farmland stakeholders to rectify NGPCL in 30 communities and 8 areas with tourist attractions within the study area from October 2021 to January 2024 was conducted (the selection of survey points was based on spatial balance and representativeness principles). The survey targets included government workers, farmers, and tourists, who are the main stakeholders of cultivated land. Three dimensions of the survey were used: perception of cultivated land status, planting intention, and satisfaction with agriculture (landscape). A total of 581 questionnaires were issued (107 for government workers, 316 for residents, and 158 for tourists), and 95.3% of the questionnaires were returned.

2.3. Research Framework

The framework of the NGPCL consolidation potential in the Dujiangyan irrigation district is shown in Figure 2. The specific decision-making path is as follows.
(1) To obtain a better understanding of NGPCL, remote sensing data, satellite images, and field investigation results were used. NGPCL was divided according to land attributes, the crop planting structure, and damage to cultivated land for various crop types. The NGPCL rate was subsequently calculated, the corresponding spatial pattern was analyzed, the NGPCL identification results were divided into farmland patches, and the theoretical NGPCL consolidation potential was obtained by dividing the proportion of the damage degree in farmland patches by area into 5 levels.
(2) To assess the constraints of realistic conditions on the consolidation potential of NGPCL, four realistic conditions, namely, farming conditions, environmental conditions, social will, and consolidation costs, were evaluated, and the analytical hierarchy process was comprehensively applied to calculate the weight of each evaluation factor and to complete the quantification and superposition of each index. Each index was then associated with a farmland patch and uniformly divided into 5 levels, which constituted the theoretical consolidation potential of NGPCL.
(3) To obtain realistic consolidation potential zoning model results, the theoretical and real consolidation potentials were matched; if the matching difference was ±1, then the corresponding cultivated patch was extracted, and the original grade was retained. For the remaining cultivated land patches, MOOA was applied to construct a zoning model of NGPCL consolidation potential with the objectives of optimizing farming conditions, maximizing ecological benefits, maximizing social agricultural development intentions, minimizing the restoration cost, and minimizing plot change.
(4) Finally, considering the background of food, territorial, and space security, strategic suggestions for NGPCL governance were proposed.

2.4. Methodology and Research Process

2.4.1. NGPCL Information Extraction

1.
Classification and Extraction of NGPCL
The land use classification results for cultivated land, forestland, water area, construction land, and wasteland areas were obtained via the interactive interpretation of remote sensing images (the accuracy of land use interpretation reached 81.43%). According to the identification results, the main land use types in the study area are cultivated land and forestland [45]. The interpretation results were subsequently superimposed on the farmland boundaries in the study area to obtain the land use types within these boundaries.
For the identification of NGPCL, first, non-agricultural land and other cultivated land within the farmland boundaries were extracted according to the land use type combined with satellite map verification. Second, NGPCL was not analyzed on the basis of land attributes, as in previous studies, and the actual crop type in each land patch within the farmland boundaries was labeled through an artificial visual comparison of satellite images and field observations [46]. Additionally, 18 experts in the fields of urban and rural planning, land management, and landscape architecture were consulted. On the basis of the degree of damage to cultivated land caused by different types of crops, the classification of NGPCL was completed, and the degree of cultivated land damage was classified (Table 1).
2.
Calculation of the NGPCL ratio
The following formula was used to calculate the ratio of the NGPCL area to the total cultivated land area [47]:
P = s 1 + s 2 S × 100 %
where P is the NGPCL ratio, S is the total area of cultivated land, s1 is the cultivated land used for production activities other than crop production, such as food and vegetable production, and s2 is the cultivated land used for other purposes, such as non-and wasteland areas.
3.
Spatial autocorrelation analysis
Spatial autocorrelation analysis has been widely used to reveal the distribution patterns of spatial elements [46]. Moran’s index in spatial autocorrelation analysis is used to determine the general trend of the spatial correlation of the NGPCL regional unit attribute values that are similar in the study area. The formula is as follows:
M = i = 1 n j = 1 n W i j x i x ¯ x j x ¯ S 2 i = 1 n j = 1 n W i j
where n is the number of research objects; xi and xj represent the attribute values of spatial units i and j, respectively; Wij is the spatial weight matrix; S2 is the observed variance; and x is the average of the observed values. The value of M ranges from −1 to 1. When M > 0, there is a positive spatial correlation. When the value is high, the degree of agglomeration is high. When M < 0, the spatial correlation is negative; if the negative correlation is small, the correlation is strong, and M = 0 indicates that the space is uncorrelated and has an independent random distribution.

2.4.2. Identification of the Consolidation Potential of NGPCL

The NGPCL consolidation potential can be defined as the threshold size of the consolidation of NGPCL in a specific area into cultivated land on the basis of policy and demand [48]. On the basis of the setting of the threshold size, theoretical and realistic consolidation potentials were considered.
  • Theoretical consolidation potential
The identification of the theoretical consolidation potential is related to the degree of damage to cultivated land caused by NGPCL production activities to reduce the difficulty of NGPCL restoration. The NGPCL classification of the degree of cultivated land damage also reflects the difficulty of restoring cultivated land; that is, when the degree of damage is low, the degree of restoration difficulty is low, and the theoretical consolidation potential is high. Moreover, considering that land consolidation was generally carried out in cultivated land patches [49], the NGPCL classification results are applied to cultivated land patches. The area proportion corresponding to the NGPCL grade for a single cultivated patch was used to determine the theoretical consolidation potential of NGPCL. The formula is as follows:
p A = A i A × 100 % ,   i = 1 , 2 , 3
V i = A i ,   p A 50 % mean ( p A ) ,   p A 50 %
In Formula (3), pA represents the ratio of the area of a single cultivated patch (A) to that of a single NGPCL type (Ai), where i represents “Value” in the NGPCL classification. In Formula (4), Vi represents the value of the level-i theoretical consolidation potential; if pA exceeds 50%, then the original value of Ai is retained; if pA is less than 50%, the average is taken according to the pA of each Ai within the cultivated patch.
The theoretical NGPCL consolidation potential is divided into 5 levels, from small to large, representing the areas with the highest, high, medium, low, and lowest consolidation potentials.
2.
The realistic consolidation conditions
In terms of practical consolidation potential, on the basis of relevant technical regulations and existing studies [48,50,51,52,53,54], four realistic conditions, namely, farming conditions, environmental conditions, social will, and consolidation costs, were considered. First, to eliminate the potential conflict between ecological protection and agricultural production, an assessment of farming conditions and the ecological environment was carried out, aiming to estimate the resources and environmental conditions needed to maximize the theoretical NGPCL consolidation potential [19,47]. Notably, the evaluation of farming conditions was based on two natural and artificial factors, and the impact of production-related factors on agriculture was analyzed, encompassing 5 categories and 15 indicators. The environmental evaluation was based on indicators from a territorial space evaluation [52] and involved assessments of 8 indicators in the 2 categories of ecological sensitivity and the importance of the ecological service function. In addition to these conditions, the consolidation of NGPCL is affected by social factors, such as social will and consolidation costs [48,50]. Among them, social will accounts for the cognitive promotion of agricultural development by the main stakeholders in the three categories of farmland use, namely, workers, farmers, and tourists; on the basis of the social willingness questionnaire, 8 indicators in 3 categories were constructed [44]. Additionally, accounting for the cost of cultivated land restoration, such as time and monetary costs, a restoration cost evaluation scheme was constructed, spanning 3 categories and 6 indicators (see details in Appendix A Table A1).
The analytical hierarchy process was used to construct a realistic consolidation potential hierarchical model with the help of 13 experts. Then, yaahp V12.11 software released by meta-decision was subsequently introduced for group decision analysis, and the weights of various indicators showing improvement potential were determined; the overall consistency ratio was 0.0696 (CR < 0.1), indicating that the judgment matrix passed the consistency test. The grid calculator in ArcGIS 10.7 software released by Esri was subsequently used to achieve index superposition, and the classification of the consolidation potential was based on the theoretical consolidation potential grade above.

2.4.3. Construction of the Zoning Model of the NGPCL Consolidation Potential

Figure 3 shows the workflow and examples of NGPCL regulation potential zoning.
  • Matching between the theoretical and realistic NGPCL consolidation potentials
To match the theoretical and realistic NGPCL consolidation potentials, the following formula was used:
| T - R x | < = | 1 | , D = T
where D is the matching difference between the theoretical consolidation potential (T) and the four realistic consolidation potentials (Rx). If the matching difference between D and the four theoretical consolidation potentials was within ±1, then the cultivated land patch was extracted, and the original grade was retained according to the theoretical consolidation potential grade.
2.
Construction of the MOOA
The MOOA was constructed with the remaining cultivated land patches as the assessment objects. In this study, the Pareto-optimal solution model was used to obtain the optimal solution of the objective function, with the goal of optimizing the states of resource optimization and efficiency.
First, the four objective functions related to optimizing farming conditions, maximizing ecological benefits, maximizing social agricultural development intention, and minimizing restoration cost were combined into a comprehensive objective function with corresponding weights. The specific formula is as follows:
F ( x ) = w 1 f 1 ( x ) + w 2 f 2 ( x ) w 4 f 4 ( x )
where F(x) is the comprehensive objective function, f1(x)f4(x) represent the four objective functions, and w1w4 are the corresponding weight coefficients.
Second, to reduce the restoration cost, the planning results should generally reflect the status quo; otherwise, labor and money will be wasted, which will have a negative impact on development. Therefore, the number of plots with changes in the consolidation potential grade should not exceed 20% of the total number of plots as a constraint condition, and the formula is as follows:
Z i i I < 20 %
In the formula, the total number of plots in the region is I, and the number of plots with changes in the consolidation potential is iZi.
In terms of algorithms, on the basis of the MATLAB r2023b platform released by MathWorks in the United States, the export conversion tool in the YALMIP environment was used, and the CPLEX solver was applied to solve the NGPCL restoration potential decision model of the study area. The unbiased Pareto-optimal solution from the perspective of tradeoff was used to establish the zoning scheme for the NGPCL consolidation potential, and the classification of the consolidation potential was the same as that described above.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of NGPCL

According to the classification of NGPCL in Section 2.4.1, NGPCL identification was performed (Figure 4). A total area of 103.08 km2 of NGPCL was extracted, accounting for 40.58% of the total study area. On the basis of Formula (1), the NGPCL ratio in the study area was calculated to be 53.8% (relative to the total area of cultivated land), confirming that most of the cultivated land in the study area is used for nonfood production. According to the classification of the degree of damage caused by NGPCL to cultivated land, the area of medium-potential land dominated by seedling planting was the largest, reaching 56.38 km2 (54.7%). Moreover, spatial patches with the lowest potential were small and distributed throughout the whole region, covering 23.12 km2 (22.43%) of the cultivated land space.
According to Formula (2), the Moran indices for the overall and cultivated land patches in the study area were positive, indicating a positive spatial correlation (p value < 0.05). Considering the large number of farmland patches and relatively dense distribution of these patches, the potential grades were determined to be linearly distributed. In the figure, the product of the horizontal and vertical coordinates is the local Moran index of the theoretical regulation potential at certain levels. The hierarchical classification of NGPCL in the study area indicated that the areas with the highest potential and lowest potential are distributed mainly in low–low aggregation areas, as illustrated in a scatter plot (the third quadrant); these areas are spatially scattered and located mainly in the middle and northern parts of the study area. Only the scatterplot of the medium-potential areas included a high–high aggregation area (the first quadrant); specifically, NGPCL shows a continuous concentrated distribution trend in the south, but it is still relatively scattered in the north.

3.2. Evaluation of Realistic Conditions for NGPCL Consolidation

On the basis of the four current spatial evaluation factors, namely, the cultivation conditions, the environmental conditions, the will of society, and the cost of consolidation, a realistic condition evaluation of NGPCL consolidation was performed; the evaluation results were associated with farmland patches, and classification into 5 levels was performed (Figure 5a). In general, the agricultural development background of the study area is good, all stakeholders show a strong willingness to develop agriculture, and the restoration cost of NGPCL in the regional agricultural space is low. In addition, the proportion of areas with a median–medium or greater consolidation potential accounted for more than 92% of the total study area, and the NGPCL consolidation potential was high (Table 2). Additionally, the proportion of land classified in the lowest consolidation potential category was relatively small, and the distribution of these areas was relatively scattered.

3.3. NGPCL Consolidation Potential Zoning Process

3.3.1. Matching of the Theoretical and Realistic Consolidation Potentials

The theoretical NGPCL consolidation potential in the study area was calculated according to Formulas (3) and (4) (Figure 5b). Overall, the areas with high potential for NGPCL consolidation are located mainly in the northern part of the study area, but their spatial distributions are relatively scattered. Although the potential for NGPCL consolidation in the southern region is medium, the spatial distribution is contiguous, which is conducive to transforming many areas into contiguous high-standard farmland zones in future NGPCL consolidation.
Formula (5) was used to determine the match between the theoretical and realistic consolidation potentials (Figure 5c). A total area of 80.60 km2 (accounting for 44.80%) was extracted, with a total of 1432 cultivated land patches, mainly with medium consolidation potential. According to the matching results, the contiguous areas are mainly concentrated in the southern part of the study area, whereas the northern consolidation potential area is concentrated mainly at the boundary of the study area, with a sporadic distribution in the center.

3.3.2. NGPCL Consolidation Potential Zoning

For the remaining 2779 cultivated land patches, MOOA was used to calculate the Pareto-optimal solution without preference from a trade-off perspective, and, ultimately, a zoning plan for the potential of NGPCL consolidation in the study area was obtained (Figure 6). Areas with medium consolidation potential accounted for a relatively large proportion of the total area in terms of patch quantity, followed by areas with high consolidation potential; those two grades accounted for 96.76% of the total cultivated land area. The overall potential for NGPCL consolidation in the research area is good.

4. Discussion

4.1. Understanding the NGPCL Phenomenon

4.1.1. NGPCL Phenomenon and Spatial Pattern

The world’s overall annual grain output is on the rise, but this has been a distraction from the serious decline in grain production due to NGPCL transformation [55]. This study provides evidence from the Dujiangyan Irrigation Project to evaluate this trend. The experimental results show that the ratio of NGPCL in the region has exceeded 50%. The statistical branch of the local government noted that the total grain output of Dujiangyan in 2023 was only 63.7% of that in 2006 [56], exceeding the national average in China [57,58]. According to the data regarding cultivated land quality, the majority of cultivated land in the region is irrigated land or paddy fields (dry land accounts for less than 1% of all land). These two types of arable land are where rice, China’s main food source, is produced. In these regions, areas with high consolidation potential account for the highest proportion of all classifications, reaching 34.9% and 27.8%, respectively, and areas with medium consolidation potential account for approximately 17%. These findings indicate that these NGPCL phenomena strongly affect food security.
Research on the spatial pattern of NGPCL indicates that NGPCL often exhibits spatial clustering effects because land operators rent surrounding farmland to expand production and the business scale after economic benefits emerge [59]. In contrast to the results of previous studies, the experimental results of this study reveal that the spatial features of various types of land patches in NGPCL areas are discrete and that the spatial patterns are “contiguous in the south and scattered in the north”. A search of the planning data provided by the Chengdu Land Consolidation and Ecological Rehabilitation Center revealed that the southern part of the study area is still dominated by seedling planting, so patches are relatively concentrated there. After multiple rounds of land consolidation, the spatial pattern of cultivated land in northern China has become diverse and fragmented via the processes of functional transformation, land concentration, and the dispersion of various types of land, thus increasing the difficulty of NGPCL consolidation.

4.1.2. Causes of NGPCL Formation and Related Governance Dilemmas

Previous studies have analyzed the reasons for the emergence of NGPCL from the perspectives of nature, policy systems, and economic factors [60,61,62]. In addition to the reasons already discussed, many inevitable NGPCL governance challenges exist in the region. First, the current policy in the research area states that cultivated land should be used for at least one season of food crop cultivation and that nonfood crop cultivation systems must be able to be converted to food production systems after one season. For the nursery industry, which has occupied a large area of cultivated land within the research area for several years or decades, this policy is not applicable. Second, owing to the cost–benefit gap, labor forces have migrated outward to seek higher returns, leading to a serious aging phenomenon in agricultural production [63]. One farmer said, “Now it’s not that we don’t want to grow food. We’re getting older and don’t have the energy, so it’s easier to manage planting trees.” Additionally, the experimental results revealed that the nursery industry in the study area has been developing for many years and that a fixed and contiguous industrial model has been formed. As one farmer said, “Now that the real estate industry is declining, the nursery stock market is also declining, and the trees cannot be sold... If we cut them down, we cannot bear to let them go, and we have to wait for them to be put there.” Such long-term occupation cannot generate economic benefits, and planting seedlings removes topsoil and causes certain damage to the quality of cultivated land. However, farmers find it difficult to comply with the demand to directly abandon years of investment, restore farmland, and plant food. If farmers are forced to restore cultivated land in NGPCL areas, it will have a significant effect on the regional industrial chain and farmers’ income [64,65]. These factors greatly limit the restoration of NGPCL.

4.2. Discussion on the Zoning of NGPCL Consolidation Potential

Previous studies rarely analyzed the governance path and consolidation potential of NGPCL [21,28]. This study extends beyond applying a single cultivated land self-index for evaluation, innovatively considering NGPCL theory and realistic consolidation potential as the main components of NGPCL consolidation. Additionally, environmental, economic, and social factors are considered in the determination of the consolidation potential. Moreover, public participation is included as an important part of realistic condition evaluation, and public participation evaluation is separated from environmental evaluation.
The proposed method relies on existing land consolidation approaches but not entirely on the MOOA in the optimization process. Instead, NGPCL theory is integrated with practical potential for transformation. This approach reflects not only the current situation of farmland damage and the corresponding difficulty of restoration under ideal conditions but also the achievable degree of theoretical potential transformation under the multiobjective constraints of cultivation conditions, the environment, social willingness, and consolidation costs. Moreover, in the selection of the objective function in the MOOA, unlike previous objectives such as maximizing economic benefits, ecological benefits, and land compactness [40], this study considers factors such as the spatial environment and social development, which represent the constraints of agricultural production stakeholders and costs of NGPCL consolidation. These methodological improvements align estimates of the consolidation potential closely with the real cultivated land space, providing a refined approach for the future consolidation of NGPCL.
Compared with previous studies at the provincial and municipal levels, in this study, a hierarchical zoning scheme is proposed on the basis of cultivated land patches, which can be effectively used to analyze the spatial heterogeneity of the NGPCL consolidation potential at the meso- and microscales and guide NGPCL consolidation at the scale of specific cultivated land patches.

4.3. Policy Recommendations for Promoting NGPCL Governance

The NGPCL phenomenon in the research area is substantial, and there is an urgent need to protect farmland. Therefore, the following suggestions are proposed.
A classification system for NGPCL based on indicators such as land classification or damage should be constructed to achieve more accurate identification, classification, and control of NGPCL and to ensure the rational use of cultivated land. For example, crop types that damage the cultivation layer should be prohibited, NGPCL behaviors that do not damage the cultivation layer should be promoted through market mechanisms, and preventive measures to prevent further increases in NGPCL should be taken.
An NGPCL hierarchical, partitioned, and phased governance system should be established. For example, in areas with high potential for improvement, priority should be given to carrying out farmland improvement work, restoring food production, and establishing phased governance goals. For areas with low consolidation potential, the reasons for the low potential should be thoroughly analyzed, the recovery costs should be evaluated, and the governance of such areas should be completed in stages.
The interests of farmers should be safeguarded, and their willingness to plant should be strengthened. Increasing food subsidies and providing a better policy environment for grain cultivation can strengthen the willingness to plant. Owing to planting limitations and land abandonment associated with aging and population loss, land transfer should be carried out on the basis of the surrounding environment and the locations of land patches to form contiguous and easily managed planting spaces. Moreover, for those engaged in long-term NGPCL production activities that occupy farmland, a comprehensive survey of crop types and production times is recommended to ensure the interests of farmers in various seasons. However, certain production regulations should be established after the sale of land to create a spatiotemporally differentiated control approach.

4.4. Limitations and Prospects

At present, the understanding of NGPCL in academic circles is not unified, leading to different classification standards for NGPCL in different regions [22,23,24,25,26]. In this study, existing research results, field investigations and expert opinions were combined to classify the types of croplands experiencing NGPCL transformation according to the degree of damage. This classification method is direct. However, the NGPCL classification results of this study may not be applicable to other regions considering the differences in crop planting types globally and among regions, which may lead to limitations in the classification approach. Therefore, in future studies, crop type statistics at the local, regional, or national scale can be used to form a more applicable NGPCL classification system.
In this study, remote sensing data were applied for land use classification, and they were used as the basis for NGPCL classification. Remote sensing data have the advantages of regular updating and easy acquisition, but the recognition accuracy of objects in images is still affected by subjective factors [66]. The land use data provided by the government are relatively accurate, but they are less commonly released and more difficult to obtain than other types of remote sensing data. Therefore, choosing the best data for classifying NGPCL should be the focus of future research.
Moreover, the natural conditions of cultivated land are highly complex, and factors such as terrain, water systems, and land area characteristics all impact NGPCL patterns [39,60]. In this study, NGPCL in plain areas was explored, but the NGPCL situation under complex terrain conditions such as mountains and hills was not analyzed. Future research should include sites with diverse terrains, and the spatial distribution characteristics and aggregation of different NGPCLs should be explored considering differences in the natural environment.

5. Conclusions

Following the research idea of “connotation definition and classification—potential identification—consolidation zoning”, an empirical study of NGPCL potential estimation and regional regulation was conducted with the Dujiangyan Irrigation District as an example. The results revealed that the phenomenon of NGPCL transformation in the study area is serious (the NGPCL rate is 53.8%), and the NGPCL recognition results displayed the trend of “contiguous in the south and scattered in the north”. Notably, the spatial imbalance was obvious. The theoretical potential of land can directly reflect the difficulty of restoring the NGPCL status quo, and the realistic consolidation potential was considered with real-world constraints to obtain realistic zoning results. The matching of theoretical and realistic potentials revealed that areas with medium consolidation potential are common and continuously distributed, and they could be the focus of farmland consolidation in the future. The final zoning results of the NGPCL consolidation potential indicate that the study area has high NGPCL consolidation potential, and the area with medium or greater consolidation potential accounts for 97.54% (4154 cultivated land patches) of the total area; these results can be used to guide NGPCL consolidation in the future.
The decision method developed for NGPCL consolidation potential zoning proposed in this paper can be used to obtain quantitative solutions under multiple conditions given multiobjective trade-offs and can be applied to guide regional and national restoration efforts and land consolidation project planning.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.D. and Q.P.; methodology, Q.D.; software, Q.D.; validation, X.L., P.H. and H.L.; formal analysis, X.L., H.L., and Y.L.; investigation, Q.D., Q.P. and L.W.; resources, P.H.; data curation, Q.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.D.; writing—review and editing, Q.D., Q.P. and Y.L.; visualization, Q.D.; supervision, L.W. and D.L.; project administration, P.H.; funding acquisition, Q.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thanks funds from Chengdu Beautiful Countryside Construction and Development Research Center, grant number CRCC2024-4 and Xihua University talent introduction program, grant number w2320048.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to all data will be anonymized, and respondents’ confidentiality will be strictly maintained.

Informed Consent Statement

The questionnaire survey was conducted only after all participants were aware of the content and verbally agreed.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Realistic evaluation index system for NGPCL consolidation.
Table A1. Realistic evaluation index system for NGPCL consolidation.
Target LayerCriterion LayerIndexBasis of ClassificationAssigned ValueWeight
The conditions of cultivationTopographic conditionsSlopeSlope < 3°10.2015
3° < Slope < 8°2
8° < Slope < 15°3
15° < Slope < 25°4
Slope > 25°5
AspectSouth10.1314
Southeast, Southwest2
East, West3
Northeast, Northwest4
North5
Soil conditionsSoil organic matter content≥3.0%10.0746
3.0–2.0%2
2.0–1.0%3
0.6–1.0%4
<0.6%5
Soil pH value6.0–6.510.0725
5.0–6.0; 6.5–7.32
4.0–5.0; 7.3–8.33
<4.0, >8.35
Effective soil layer thickness≥100 cm10.055
60–100 cm2
30–60 cm3
<30 cm5
Surface soil textureLoam10.0451
Clay2
Sandy soil3
Gravelly soil5
Plot conditionsPlot areaContiguous farmland area > 18 hm210.0451
Contiguous farmland area > 3 hm22
Contiguous farmland area > 1 hm23
Contiguous farmland area > 0.5 hm24
Contiguous farmland area < 0.5 hm25
Grade of cultivated land qualityThe cultivated land quality grade is 810.0419
The cultivated land quality grade is 93
The cultivated land quality grade is 105
Plot regularityAccording to the calculation results, five levels are divided according to the natural break classification0.0288
Irrigation and drainage conditionsDistance from water0.0266
Irrigation conditions0.0254
Drainage conditionsThe drainage system is relatively sound10.0243
The drainage system is generally sound3
The drainage system is not sound5
Location and traffic conditionsDistance from roadAccording to the calculation results, five levels are divided according to the natural break classification0.0206
Distance from settlements0.02
Tillage road density0.0192
The ecological environmentEcological sensitivity evaluationElevationElevation < 600 m10.0189
600 m < Elevation < 700 m2
Elevation > 700 m3
SlopeThe same as the slope index above0.0173
AspectThe same as the aspect index above0.0128
Spatial distribution of water resources>200 m buffer for rivers, >100 m buffer for ponds10.0123
100–200 m buffer for rivers, 50–100 m buffer for ponds2
50–100 m buffer for rivers, 20–50 m buffer for ponds3
20–50 m buffer for rivers, 10–20 m buffer for ponds4
0–20 m buffer for rivers, 0–10 m buffer for ponds5
Land use typeLand for construction, wasteland10.0114
Farmland3
Waters, woodland5
Evaluation of the importance of ecological service functionsSecurity of water resourcesNo water, distance > 150 m10.0101
Dispersed small water bodies, distance ≤ 150 m2
Relatively concentrated small water bodies, distance < 100 m3
Medium area water bodies, distance < 50 m4
Large area of water bodies, distance < 20 m5
Vegetation coverage20% < Coverage ≤ 35%10.0088
35% < Coverage ≤ 45%2
45% < Coverage ≤ 60%3
Coverage > 60%5
Ecological disturbance of development and constructionThe density of traffic, villages, and towns is very high, and the population is more than 500010.0085
The density of transportation, villages, and towns is high, with 4000 < population ≤ 50002
The density of traffic, villages, and towns is in the middle, with 3000 < population ≤ 40003
The density of traffic and villages is low, with a population of greater than 2000 and ≤30004
The density of traffic, villages and towns is very low, 1000 < population ≤ 20005
The will of societySpatial cognition of government workersIndustrial spatial development perceptionAccording to the calculation results, five levels are divided according to the natural break classification0.0083
Perception of agricultural development status0.0074
Agricultural industry cognitionIndustry satisfaction0.0067
Satisfaction with permanent basic farmland demarcation0.0066
Satisfaction degree of cultivated land occupation0.0057
Planting intention intensity0.0057
Tourist value perceptionAgricultural landscape identity0.0049
Current landscape satisfaction0.0047
The costs of consolidationThe monetary costs of consolidationConsolidation areaAccording to the area size of a single NGPCL, it is divided into 5 classes according to the natural break classification 0.0042
Project rehabilitation measures’ costValue 1 in NGPCL10.0027
Trees such as fruit trees in Value 1 of NGPCL2
Value 2 in NGPCL3
Value 3 in NGPCL4
Other non-agricultural occupation5
Soil fertility restoration costs According to the soil pH, organic matter content, heavy metal content, and other indicators, according to the natural discontinuous classification of 5 levels0.0027
The time costs of consolidationThe time it takes to plowAccording to the estimated end time of NGPCL production activities in the current quarter, there are 5 levels according to the natural break classification0.0050
The opportunity costs of consolidationContiguity of landThe boundary distance is ≤10 m, and the contiguous cultivated land area is ≥5 hm210.0019
Boundary distance ≤ 10 m, 5 hm2 > contiguous cultivated land area > 2 hm22
Boundary distance ≤ 10 m, 2 hm2 > contiguous cultivated land area > 1 hm23
Boundary distance ≤ 10 m, 1 hm2 > contiguous cultivated land area > 0.5 hm24
Boundary distance ≤ 10 m, 0.1 hm2 > contiguous cultivated land area5
Distance from existing cultivated land According to the distance from the existing cultivated land, it is divided into 5 levels according to the natural break classification 0.0013
Questionnaire A1.
Non-grain-producing cultivated land (NGPCL) classification survey.
Dear expert,
        Greetings! The author is currently investigating non-grain production activities on cultivated land. To enhance the objectivity and scientific rigor of the definition and classification of NGPCL proposed in this research, we kindly request your expertise and academic insights in this field to provide ratings for various crop types that delineate NGPCL through this questionnaire. Please note that the questionnaire is intended solely for academic research purposes, and your participation would be appreciated.
        (Kindly note that the focus of this study is specifically on discussing “NGPCL” in cultivated land areas and does not encompass the “non-agricultural” issues arising from construction and industrial land encroachment on cultivated areas.)
The details are as follows:
1. Which of the following production activities falls within the scope of NGPCL?
□ Chinese herbal planting, □ Tobacco planting, □ Tea planting, □ Fruit planting, □ Herbaceous flower planting, □ Turf planting, □ Fast-growing forest planting, □ Seedling planting, □ Shrub planting, □ Livestock breeding, □ Pond culture
Other types of crops: ________
2. Please score the damage to cultivated land caused by the following crop type (the higher the score is, the higher the degree of damage):
Types of Crop TypeGrade
Chinese herbal planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Tobacco planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Tea planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Fruit planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Herbaceous flower planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Turf planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Fast-growing forest planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Seedling planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Shrub planting1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Livestock breeding1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Pond culture1□        2□        3□        4□        5□
Questionnaire A2.
Investigation of non-grain-producing cultivated land (NGPCL) in the Dujiangyan irrigation district.
Dear participant,
        Greetings! We are currently conducting a survey on NGPCL in the Dujiangyan irrigation district. We sincerely appreciate your valuable input amidst your busy schedule. This questionnaire does not include any personal information. By completing the questionnaire, you consent to the use of the data for scientific research purposes. Your contribution to this study is greatly appreciated. The survey comprises multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions, where providing your details is mandatory but providing answers is optional. Each item features 5 rating levels; kindly mark “√” next to the appropriate choice. A lower score indicates lower satisfaction with the content or suggests that it is in poor condition.
        You are currently located at ________ company (skip to 1)/community (skip to 2)/scenic spot (skip to 3)
1. Questionnaires for government workers
  • What do you think of the current agricultural development in your region?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • What do you think of the development prospects of the agricultural industry in your region
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • What do you think of the NGPCL phenomenon?___________
  • What problems do you think exist in the agricultural space in your region?___________
2. Questionnaires for farmers
  • What is your family’s main source of income?
    A. Being a farmer B. Owning a business C.Being a worker D. Others___________
  • How satisfied are you with the agricultural industry in your region?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • How satisfied are you with the permanent basic farmland designation in your area?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • How satisfied are you with the farmland compensation in your area?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • If you want to participate in agricultural planting in the future, how strong is your willingness to plant?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • What problems and difficulties do you think exist in agricultural production in your region? ___________

3. Questionnaire for tourists
1. What attracts you most to the region’s natural landscape (multiple choices)
A. Geological landform B. Woodland vegetation C. Pastoral landscape D. River wetland E. Biological landscape F. Others___________
  • How satisfied are you with the current landscape of the area?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • How do you like the agricultural landscape in the countryside?
    □ 1        □ 2        □ 3        □ 4        □ 5        
  • What do you think the agricultural landscape should look like?___________
  • What problems do you think exist in the regional agricultural landscape?___________

References

  1. Global Report on Food Crises. Global Report on Food Crises 2023. Available online: https://www.fightfoodcrises.net/crises/en/ (accessed on 23 December 2023).
  2. Zhang, J.; He, C.; Chen, L.; Cao, S. Improving Food Security in China by Taking Advantage of Marginal and Degraded Lands. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, L.; Tingting, F.; Jinmin, H. The evolving concepts of land administration in China: Cultivated land protection perspective. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Su, M.; Guo, R.; Hong, W. Institutional transition transition and implementation path for cultivated land protection in highly urbanized regions: A case study of Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy 2019, 81, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mehrabi, Z.; Delzeit, R.; Ignaciuk, A.; Levers, C.; Braich, G.; Bajaj, K.; Amo-Aidoo, A.; Anderson, W.; Balgah, R.A.; Benton, T.G.; et al. Research Priorities for Global Food Security under Extreme Events. One Earth 2022, 5, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pasakarnis, G.; Maliene, V.; Dixon-Gough, R.; Malys, N. Decision support framework to rank and prioritise the potential land areas for comprehensive land consolidation. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Min, M.; Duan, X.; Yan, W.; Miao, C. Quantitative Simulation of the Relationships between Cultivated Land-Use Patterns and Non-Point Source Pollutant Loads at a Township Scale in Chaohu Lake Basin, China. Catena 2022, 208, 105776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, C.; Wang, W.; Li, W.C. The Impact of Nongrain Utilization on the Quality of Cultivated Land. China Land 2021, 3, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qu, F.T.; Chen, J.L.; Chen, W. Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Land Conversion Rconomic Driving Forces. J. Nat. Resour. 2005, 20, 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuang, Y.; Liu, Y. Distingushing “Non-agriculturalization” and “Non-grainification” in the Process of Rural Transfer. Rural Econ. 2018, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tao, J. Effects of Cultivated Land Use on Temporal-Spatial Variation of Grain Production in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2014, 29, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, C.Z.; Nie, C.R. The experience and enlightenment of foreign cultivated land “non-grain” management -- based on the perspective of food security. J. Smart Agric. 2023, 3, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions of the General Office of the State Council of China on Preventing the Non Grain Conversion of Farmland and Stabilizing Grain Production. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-11/17/content_5562053.htm (accessed on 25 December 2023).
  14. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. China Central Document No. 1. Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cn/so/s?qt=%E4%B8%AD%E5%A4%AE%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%B7%E6%96%87%E4%BB%B6 (accessed on 25 December 2023).
  15. Wu, Y.L.; Zhang, P.; Yu, Y.Y.; Xie, R.Y. Progress Review on and Prospects for Non-grain Cultivated Land in China from the Perspective of Food Security. China Land Sci. 2021, 35, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, Z.; Duan, J.; Li, S.; Dai, Z.; Feng, Y. Phenomenon of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land Has Become Increasingly Prominent over the Last 20 Years: Evidence from Guanzhong Plain, China. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Zhao, B.; Huang, A.; Xiong, B.; Song, C. Characteristics and Driving Forces of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land from the Perspective of Food Security. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, K.; Deng, J.; Shahtahmassebi, A.R.; Zhang, L.; Ao, W.; Guan, T.; Pan, Y.; Gan, M. Quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics and multi-aspect performance of non-grain production during 2000–2015 at a fine scale. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 101, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Y.; Chang, Y.; Liu, J.; Ge, X.; Liu, G.J.; Chen, F. Spatial Differentiation of Non-Grain Production on Cultivated Land and Its Driving Factors in Coastal China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, Y.; Qian, K.; Lin, L.; Wang, K.; Guan, T.; Gan, M. Identifying the Driving Forces of Non-Grain Production Expansion in Rural China and Its Implications for Policies on Cultivated Land Protection. Land Use Policy 2020, 92, 104435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.Z.; Song, W.; Zhang, W.X.; Li, X.J.; Liu, J.Q.; Li, J.Y. Analysis of Spatial Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Non-grain Cultivated Land in Shandong Province. China Land Sci. 2021, 35, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meng, F.; Tan, Y.Z.; Chen, H.; Xiong, W.Y. Spatial-temporal Evolution Patterns and Influencing Factors of “Non-grain” Utilization of Cultivated Land in China. China Land Sci. 2022, 36, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Z.; Yang, Z. Research Progress, Problems and Prospects of “Non-grain” of Cultivated Land in China. Asian Agric. Res. 2022, 14, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, X.; Zhong, J.; Lin, S.; Dai, R.; He, Z.; Shi, G. Characteristics and driving mechanism of spatial differentiation of “Non-grain” cultivated land in karst trough valley area: Taking Wanshan District, Tongren, Guizhou as an example. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2022, 42, 2207–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.F.; Yuan, C.C.; Liu, Z.X.; Wu, H.P.; Wei, X. Decoupling relationship between the non-grain production and intensification of cultivated land in China based on Tapio decoupling model. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 424, 138800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ren, G.; Song, G.; Wang, Q.; Sui, H. Impact of “Non-Grain” in Cultivated Land on Agricultural Development Resilience: A Case Study from the Major Grain-Producing Area of Northeast China. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of the Office of the Third National Land Survey Leading Group of The State Council of the People’s Republic of China on the issuance of the “National Technical Regulations for the Verification of the Results of the Third National Land Survey”. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-03/02/content_5369928.htm (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  28. Guo, H.; Lei, W.; Fan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H. Multi-factor comprehensive evaluation model for the potential of cultivated land consolidation for Yanqing District in Beijing. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2006, 22, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  29. Song, W.; Chen, B.M.; Jiang, G.H. Research on land consolidation potential of rural habitat in China: Review and preview. Econ. Geogr. 2010, 30, 1871–1877. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xiang, X.M.; Jin, X.B.; Du, X.D.; Sun, W.; Zhou, Y.K. The coordination of farmland consolidation implementation in China by comprehen-sive measure of “intensity, potential and difficulty”. Geo-Graph. Res. 2016, 35, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, C.; Li, w.; Jiang, Y. Determination of crop target yield based on cultivated land potential productivity evaluation. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2011, 27, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.L.; Wang, L.X.; Huo, X.W.; Zhang, L.L. Study on the Realistic Potential of Farmland Consolidation on the Theory of Productivity: A Case Study on Suning County. Hebei Prov. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2011, 18, 202–206, 212. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao, J.G.; Huang, R. Protection Zoning of Cultivated Land Based on Cultivated Land Quality Index and Spatial Autocorrelation on Southern Area of Jiangsu Province. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2019, 26, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao, S.G.; Chen, Y.H.; Xu, H. Calculational Method Study on Cultivated Land Consolidation Potential Based on Agricultural Land Classification Achievement a Case Study: Taocheng District, Hengshui City. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2008, 01, 397–401. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yuan, Y.; Hu, B.; Lei, L.; Chang, Q.R. Ecological Suitability Evaluation and Planting Division of Wheat in Shangnan under GIS Support. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2017, 33, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Su, Y.; Su, C.; Xie, Y.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y. Controlling Non-Grain Production Based on Cultivated Land Multifunction Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guan, X.K.; Guo, L.N.; Zhang, F.R.; Zhao, T.T. A Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated Land in Beijing for Multi-Purposes Use and Its Spatio-Temporal Investigation. Resour. Sci. 2010, 32, 580–587. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tadesse, M.; Negese, A. Land suitability evaluation for sorghum crop by using GIS and AHP techniques in Agamsa Sub-Watershed, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2020, 6, 1743624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, R.Z.; Chen, Y.J.; Yi, X.Y.; Fang, L.N. The Causes and Countermeasures on the Excessive ”Non-food” Tendency in the Process of Land Transfer. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2020, 33, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, H.Y.; Gao, P.C.; Xie, Y.R.; Song, C.Q.; Cheng, C.X.; Ye, S.J. Multi-objective Optimization of Land Use in Xining City Based on Improved NSGA-II. Geogr. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2020, 36, 84–89. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, J.; Zhong, L.N.; Ying, L.X. Review on the study of the impacts of land consolidation on ecosystem services. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2018, 34, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tan, R.; Beckmann, V.; Berg, L.; Qu, F. Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, J.; Hu, W.; Liang, C.; Peng, W. On the Public Participation in Land Consolidation. J. Hebei Agric. Sci. 2010, 14, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, A.; Zheng, J.; Yu, J. Research on Scientifically and Rationally Promoting the Fallow of Cultivated Land under the Strategy of Rural Revitalization. Asian Agric. Res. 2019, 11, 4. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dong, Q.; Cai, J.; Wu, L.; Li, D.; Chen, Q. Quantitative Identification of Rural Functions Based on Big Data: A Case Study of Dujiangyan Irrigation District in Chengdu. Land 2022, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, X.Y. Preliminary Studies on Division of Agricultural Production Type. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 1982, 2, 247–253, 293. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, Z.; Zheng, L.; Yu, D. Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land in Hilly and Mountainous Areas at the Village Scale: A Case Study in Le’an Country, China. Land 2021, 12, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, S.L.; Jin, X.B.; Zhang, X.Y.; Shi, S.; Shi, Y.C.; Liu, j.; Zhou, Y.K. Potential and differentiated control of non-grain cultivated land consolidation in major grain producing areas: A case study of the Chengdu Plain. Prog. Geogr. 2023, 42, 2172–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, X.B.; Cai, W.M.; Kong, X.B.; Li, Q.F.; Zhao, J. Quality regulation pattern and consolidation time zone of county-level cultivated land based on multi agent collaboration. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2023, 39, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, K.; Li, J.Y.; Wang, Q. Evaluation on agricultural production space and layout optimization based on resources and environmental carrying capacity: A case study of Fujian Province. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2021, 41, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, X.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; Duan, J. Evaluation of reserve available land resources based on three types of territorial space: A case study of Jiexiu City in Shanxi Province. Prog. Geogr. 2021, 40, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ministry of Natural Resources, People’s Republic of China. Letter from the General Office of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China on Issuing the “Guidelines for Evaluating the Carrying Capacity of Resources and Environment and the Suitability of Land and Space Development (Trial)”. Available online: http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202001/t20200121_2498502.html (accessed on 25 December 2023).
  53. Cui, X.; Zhou, T.; Xiong, X.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y. Farmland Suitability Evaluation Oriented by Non-Agriculturalization Sensitivity: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China. Land 2022, 11, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pu, F. Research on dual evaluation of city and county land space supported by multi-source data. Heilongjiang Sci. 2023, 14, 159–161.6. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jiang, P. The Construction of food security pattern in the New Era from the perspective of urban and rural integrated development—On the three constraints and challenges of China’s food production. Beijing Plan. Rev. 2021, 1, 164–169. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dujiangyan Irrigation Project Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Bulletin of National economic and Social Development of Dujiangyan City in 2022. Available online: http://www.djy.gov.cn/dyjgb_rmzfwz/c130222/only_list.shtml (accessed on 18 January 2024).
  57. Kong, X.B. Problems, causes and countermeasures of “non-grain cultivation” of cultivated land. China Land 2020, 11, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, H.; Bian, Z.; Chen, F. Spatial pattern differentiation of cultivated land non-grain conversion in major grain-producing areas. J. Agric. Resour. Environ. 2022, 39, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shi, Y.; Duan, W.; Fleskens, L.; Li, M.; Hao, J. Study on evaluation of regional cultivated land quality based on resource-asset-capital attributes and its spatial mechanism. Appl. Geogr. 2020, 125, 102284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, N.; Hao, J.; Zhang, L.; Duan, W.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wusimanjiang, P. Basic Farmland Protection System in China: Changes, Conflicts and Prospects. Agronomy 2023, 13, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Notice of the General Office of the Chengdu Municipal People’s Government on the issuance of the Work Plan for Preventing “Non-Grain” of Cultivated Land and Stabilizing Grain Production in Chengdu. Available online: https://www.chengdu.gov.cn/gkml/cdsrmzfbgt/qtwj/1613191520511434752.shtml (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  62. Liu, D.; Gong, Q.W. The impact of “de-graining” on national grain security during rural land transfer and some governance suggestions. Res. Agric. Mod. 2017, 38, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Jin, S.; Chen, K.; Peng, C. Migration, Local Off-Farm Employment, and Agricultural Production Efficiency: Evidence from China. SSRN Electron. J. 2014, 07, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ramos-Sandoval, R.; García-lvarez-Coque, J.M.; Mas-Verdú, F. Innovation behaviour and the use of research and extension services in small-scale agricultural holdings. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 20, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hopfensitz, A.; Miquel-Florensa, J. Mill ownership and farmer’s cooperative behavior: The case of Costa Rica coffee farmers. J. Institutional Econ. 2017, 13, 623–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.; Cao, J.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Zuo, F.; Bai, M. Improving the Interpretability and Reliability of Regional Land Cover Classification by U-Net Using Remote Sensing Data. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2022, 32, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of the study area.
Figure 1. Overview of the study area.
Sustainability 16 07798 g001
Figure 2. Diagram of the proposed method and processes.
Figure 2. Diagram of the proposed method and processes.
Sustainability 16 07798 g002
Figure 3. Example of NGPCL regulation potential zoning process.
Figure 3. Example of NGPCL regulation potential zoning process.
Sustainability 16 07798 g003
Figure 4. Statistics and spatial models of the NGPCL recognition results in the Dujiangyan irrigation district.
Figure 4. Statistics and spatial models of the NGPCL recognition results in the Dujiangyan irrigation district.
Sustainability 16 07798 g004
Figure 5. (a) Realistic potential; (b) theoretical potential; (c) theoretical and realistic consolidation potential matching results.
Figure 5. (a) Realistic potential; (b) theoretical potential; (c) theoretical and realistic consolidation potential matching results.
Sustainability 16 07798 g005
Figure 6. Zoning scheme of the regulatory potential of NGPCL in the study area.
Figure 6. Zoning scheme of the regulatory potential of NGPCL in the study area.
Sustainability 16 07798 g006
Table 1. Classification of NGPCL.
Table 1. Classification of NGPCL.
Crop TypeExpert RatingLand Use TypeExample of Satellite ImageryExample EnvironmentsPotential GradeDescription
Chinese herbal planting0.47Other gardens and cultivated landSustainability 16 07798 i001Sustainability 16 07798 i002 Highest The root system is short, and the damage to the soil layer is limited
Tobacco planting1
Tea planting2.47
Fruit planting2.47OrchardSustainability 16 07798 i003Sustainability 16 07798 i004
Herbaceous flower planting2.53Other gardens
Turf planting2.4
Shrub planting4.4Bushland
Fast-growing forest planting4.87ForestlandSustainability 16 07798 i005Sustainability 16 07798 i006 Medium Coarse root system, easily resulting in soil degradation and acidification; soil ball transplantation reduces the thickness of the plowing layer
Seedling planting4.87
Pond culture4.87Breeding pondSustainability 16 07798 i007Sustainability 16 07798 i008 Lowest Extensive excavation or hardening of the soil surface
Livestock breeding4.87Facility agricultural landSustainability 16 07798 i009Sustainability 16 07798 i010
Non-agricultural, paved, occupied, or other cultivated land occupiedSustainability 16 07798 i011
Table 2. Potential grades of NGPCL consolidation based on realistic condition evaluation.
Table 2. Potential grades of NGPCL consolidation based on realistic condition evaluation.
Graded Area (km2)/Proportion (%)
HighestHighMediumLowLowest
The conditions of cultivation5.77 (3.21%)80.31 (44.63%)88.77 (49.34%)4.86 (2.70%)1.03 (0.57%)
The environmental conditions0.14 (0.08%)41.75 (23.21%)50.10 (27.85%)85.07 (47.28%)3.73 (2.07%)
The will of society64.02 (35.58%)55.49 (30.84%)47.03 (26.14%)13.01 (7.23%)1.19 (0.66%)
The cost of consolidation3.22 (1.79%)34.84 (19.36%)141.21 (78.48%)--
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Q.; Peng, Q.; Luo, X.; Lu, H.; He, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, L.; Li, D. The Optimal Zoning of Non-Grain-Producing Cultivated Land Consolidation Potential: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177798

AMA Style

Dong Q, Peng Q, Luo X, Lu H, He P, Li Y, Wu L, Li D. The Optimal Zoning of Non-Grain-Producing Cultivated Land Consolidation Potential: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Qidi, Qiao Peng, Xiaohong Luo, Heng Lu, Pengman He, Yanling Li, Linjia Wu, and Di Li. 2024. "The Optimal Zoning of Non-Grain-Producing Cultivated Land Consolidation Potential: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop