Next Article in Journal
Offshore Wind Power: Progress of the Edge Tool, Which Can Promote Sustainable Energy Development
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Ejectors Plant Technology for Sediment by-Pass in Harbours and Ports
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System Hybridized Models in the Sustainable Integration of Language and Mathematics Skills: The Case of Singapore and Hong Kong

Atatürk Faculty of Education, Near East University, Northern Cyprus, Nicosia 99138, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7806; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177806
Submission received: 25 August 2024 / Revised: 2 September 2024 / Accepted: 5 September 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024

Abstract

:
The four basic language skills, listening, speaking, reading, and writing play, a crucial role in the development of an individual’s skills in other disciplines. The current study aims to underpin the relationship between language skills and mathematics skills by focusing on the language and mathematics curricula of two consistently high-achieving countries, Hong Kong and Singapore, in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) rankings. In the current study, the convergent parallel mixed method was utilized that qualitative and quantitative data were composed together. Primarily, the outcomes of four language skills were determined in the native language teaching curricula of the two countries. The topics and themes related to four basic language skills were determined from the two mathematics curricula. The curricula were examined by document analysis from qualitative research methods. The analysis was conducted by examining the native language teaching and the mathematics curricula of both countries by the content analysis method. Later, the findings of the document analysis were used to develop machine learning models to find a possible positive relationship between language skills and the PISA scores. Although a number of previous studies have found a reasonable relationship between language skills and mathematics skills, the current study results were contradictory to the ones performed previously in the literature, and considering the curricula no positive relationship between the language and mathematics skills was found. The findings of the current study were further supported by the artificial neural network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model performance metrics. Compared to an acceptable level of 0.80, significantly low R2 values of 0.35 and 0.39 for the ANN and ANFIS models, respectively, indicated very little relationship between the language and mathematics skills.

1. Introduction

Language is a skill that people learn first from their family and then from the environment in which they live. It develops continually throughout an individual’s life. The progress of listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills, which are included under understanding/explaining skills are called the four basic language skills, and they pertain to the development of every individual in the early childhood stage. It is meaningful to achieve a competent level of language skills for success across different disciplines, learning areas, and in the development of various types of intelligence. To develop four basic language skills and achieve success in other learning areas, the native language is the child’s helper in all lessons, including foreign language skills, and it should be used systematically [1]. Among these different areas, mathematics skills are also included. Being successful in the field of mathematics depends on competence in language skills. Mathematics success relies on the development of different linguistic skills in individuals. Application of these skills is crucial to improving lower levels of mathematical attainment.
Language is important in understanding how mathematical activities are shaped. It also helps us to understand how we relate language, teaching, and learning processes to other social interactions. Language-oriented research also deals with multilingual mathematics classes [2]. The influence of language on mathematical skills is very important and it can affect a student’s mathematics achievement. Language-oriented research identifies four main areas in mathematics education [3].
There is a strong relationship between a student’s mathematics skills and a student’s learning processes, other social interactions, and multilingual contexts. It is also important to develop the competencies required in the mathematical applications of the language. Mathematical language is a tool used to express mathematical concepts. Using mathematical terms correctly and consciously helps students better understand mathematical concepts. Students can embody abstract concepts through mathematical language and improve their mathematical thinking skills. The effective use of native language in mathematics also increases a student’s ability to use correct expressions and understand the results when solving mathematical problems. It is necessary to emphasize the meaning of mathematical language to students and encourage them to use the correct terms to express mathematical concepts [4].
In this context, language contributes to the development of intelligence by affecting thinking style and perception. In mathematics education, language is also an important tool for expressing and making sense of abstract concepts. The relationship between mathematics and language shows that mathematics is one of the languages developed by society to be able to decode concepts and relations [5].
The relationship between language and mathematics success is an important factor that affects the sustainability and continuity of education. The relationship between mathematics success and reading comprehension skills contributes to the development of both mathematical skills and language skills of students. In this context, an education system that is compatible with sustainable development goals should emphasize qualified education and language skills. Mathematics and language are one of the cornerstones of sustainable development. High-quality education has a significant role in upbringing individuals who will support sustainable development by enhancing their knowledge, skills, and social values. At this point, for sustainability in education, students should be offered opportunities to improve both math and language skills [6]. Education in all its dimensions gives these skills to students in terms of gaining basic life skills and academic success. The curricula, course materials, methods, and techniques that form the foundations of education systems should be revised by considering the latest advancements and the requirements of the period. In this direction, it is necessary to take advanced education systems as a role model and follow advancements in education globally.
The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is one of the educational surveys organized by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). PISA has been conducted every three years since 2000. The outcomes of PISA are steering guidance for developing education systems by following international innovations in education. In PISA, students in the 15-year-old age group representing each country are selected by a non-selective method and tested for their skills in the areas of reading, mathematics, and science. PISA has made it possible for countries to become observation reports for themselves and each other [7].
Among the consistent countries that regularly achieved success in mathematics and reading in PISA between 2012, 2015, and 2018 are Singapore and Hong Kong. The Pisa rankings for the above-mentioned countries are tabulated in Table 1.
The year of PISA data used in the analysis part of this research is 2018. In Table 2, the 2018 PISA results are shown separately by country and mathematics–reading areas.
The schooling rate is very high in Singapore. This is due to the fact that Singapore has opened its doors to students from many foreign countries. Singapore has divided the primary school program into mother tongue and English, social sciences and arts, science and mathematics education, life skills, and added advanced language skills in secondary school [8]. The Hong Kong Ministry of Education designed the key learning areas as Chinese, English, mathematics, science, technology, art, personal–social and humanities and physical education. There are seven basic learning goals in primary school education: awareness of responsibility, national identity, reading habits, language skills, learning skills, knowledge coverage, and healthy lifestyle (Education Bureau) [9].
Singapore and Hong Kong have regularly shown the same achievement rankings in both mathematics and reading areas. The reasons behind this stabilized success are likely to be based on the content of their curricula. In this context, the native language teaching curriculum and mathematics curriculum of these countries were investigated. The achievements of the language skills from the native language teaching programs of the countries and the achievements related to the language skills in the mathematics programs were determined. Consecutively, ANN and ANFIS analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between the results obtained from mathematics teaching programs and native language teaching programs.
ANN is a data-driven artificial neural network modeling technique that works similarly to the way human cells function. ANFIS, a hybrid model that combines the abilities of ANN and fuzzy logic theory, takes advantage of both data and knowledge-based modeling, which aids in solving complex world problems that commonly involve considerable uncertainty and non-linearity that require human-like thinking expertise. ANN and ANFIS involve developing different network architectures; however, the goal, which is to predict or estimate a dependent variable from some independent variables, is the same [10]. Particularly, in educational sciences, the use of data where limits cannot be determined with certainty in the analysis enables models to achieve more successful results. The selection of ANN and ANFIS modeling techniques in the current study was also related to this fact.
This research aims to examine the relationship between language skills and mathematics success. In this context, PISA, the program for international student assessment, has been taken as an example. Two countries that regularly achieved success in both reading skills and mathematics in the PISA exam were included in the scope of the research. Both the native language teaching and mathematics teaching programs of the mentioned countries, Singapore and Hong Kong, were examined. In addition to the data obtained after the examination, ANN and ANFIS analyses were performed. For this purpose, answers to the following questions were sought:
  • What is the relationship between language skills and mathematics success according to the data obtained from the native language teaching and mathematics teaching programs?
  • What is the relationship between language and mathematics skills using ANN and ANFIS?
  • What is the comparison of the results obtained from the ANN and ANFIS analyses?

2. Research Method

2.1. Research Sampling

In this research, the native language teaching and mathematics teaching curricula of Singapore and Hong Kong were examined. The research consists of three parts: content analysis of mathematics and native language curricula of the mentioned countries, ANN analysis, and ANFIS analysis. Native language teaching and mathematics curricula of Singapore and Hong Kong were accessed from official ministries of education.
The curricula investigated in the present study were retrieved from the following links:
Singapore English Language Syllabus 2020 (Primary 5–6 to secondary 1, 2, and 3) (https://libris.nie.edu.sg/sites/default/files/2020-01/primary_els-2020-_syllabus.pdf) (accessed on 15 December 2023).
Hong Kong English Language Education 2017 Primary 1–Secondary 6 (Primary 1–Secondary 6) (https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/eng-edu/Curriculum%20Document/ELE%20KLACG_2017.pdf) (accessed on 15 December 2023).
Singapore Mathematics Syllabus Primary one to six (https://www.moe.gov.sg/primary/curriculum/syllabus). (https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/primary/2021-primary-mathematics-syllabus-p1-to-p6.pdf) (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Hong Kong Mathematics Education Curriculum Guide Primary 1–Secondary 6 (https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/ma/curr/index2.html) (https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/ma/curr/ME_KLACG_eng_2017_12_08.pdf) (accessed on 28 December 2023).

2.2. Data Collection Method

Primarily, the outcomes of four language skills were determined in the native language teaching curricula of Singapore and Hong Kong. The topics and themes related to four basic language skills were determined from the two mathematics curricula. The curricula were examined by document analysis from qualitative research methods. Qualitative research is defined as research in which the data are collected using qualitative data collection methods such as behavior observation, interviews with participants, and document review, and a qualitative process is followed to present the findings holistically [11,12]. Document analysis covers the gradual analysis of materials based on the facts or facts that are intended to be investigated [12].
Additionally, in the current study, two different models were employed using ANN and ANFIS. The working principle of an ANN is similar to the principle of human brain processing. Each neuron receives input, processes it, and produces an output signal, which is then passed to the next layer of neurons. ANFIS, on the other hand, is an adaptive network approach that is considered a hybrid model that combines the benefits of ANN and fuzzy logic [13]. One of the significant advantages of ANFIS over the other models is that it combines the abilities of ANN and fuzzy logic to solve complex non-linear relationships between the input and output variables. The ANFIS model mixes the learning algorithms of both ANNs and fuzzy logic to overcome the problems of complex non-linearity between input and output variables [14,15].
Considering the purpose of the research, it was decided to use mixed methods in this study. We aimed to find better answers to the research aims and sub-objectives by using mostly quantitative and qualitative methods simultaneously in the mixed method content [16,17]. The mixed methods approach is based on three models: the first is the sequential explanatory mixed method, the second is the convergent parallel mixed method, and the third is the exploratory sequential mixed method. In this study, the “convergent parallel mixed method” was used, in which qualitative and quantitative data were collected together. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed separately, and as a result of the findings, it was also taken into consideration whether these findings were related to each other or supported by each other [18].

2.3. Data Analysis

The native language teaching and mathematics curricula of both countries were examined by the content analysis method. Content analysis is used in social sciences and refers to the separation of content as code and theme in exchange for certain forms [12,19]. Among the learning outcomes for the curricula at each grade level, those related to language skills were examined. The themes identified for each country are shown in a tabular form.
The themes related to language skills in the mathematics program of the countries participating in the study are shown in Table 3.
The themes and common themes obtained based on the outcomes of the mathematics curricula of the subject countries were determined. Then, we determined which of the identified themes could be included in language skills. The code numbers and frequencies obtained from this were compared with the 2018 PISA scores.
Two different combinations were created according to ANN and ANFIS in the comparison. Combinations, which mean two separate models for the ANN and ANFIS part of the research, are necessary for developing architectures [20]. Combination models tabulated in MS Office Excel spreadsheet environment were analyzed by using ANN and ANFIS tools in MATLAB version 2019a, a multi-paradigm numerical calculation software.
The development of ANN was inspired by the human brain. ANN is based on computational learning and it uses a machine learning approach to develop models by mimicking the processing of a human brain [21]. Rules are set by providing input and output information during learning in artificial neural networks. ANN commonly employs a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model, which was also utilized in the present work. MLP consists of input, hidden, and output layers in its architecture. Other parameters involved in ANN model development are the training and activation functions, of which several options are available and can be selected by trial and error according to the model performance. According to the model performance results, the optimum performing training and activation functions were found to be the Levenberg Marquardt and hyperbolic tangent functions, respectively.
ANFIS models adopt the ANN working principles while adding the benefits of fuzzy logic systems, which make it a hybrid modeling technique. ANN parts are responsible for the data-driven systems while the fuzzy logic part is responsible for the knowledge-driven system. Although ANFIS has been previously utilized in many research areas, the research regarding the applicability of using ANFIS in educational sciences is still vague. However, the hybrid nature of ANFIS can make it a remarkable technique in this field. ANFIS architecture consists of five distinct layers, each of which performs unique calculations to optimize the model performance. In the current study, MATLAB 2019a version ANFIS toolbox user interface was used. The membership function utilized was the Gaussian bell. The input parameters included verbal skills of teaching programs and the output parameters were PISA scores. The data splitting was conducted as follows: 70% for training, 15% for testing, and 15% for validations.
Training in ANFIS involves forward- and back-pass calculations until the model finds the optimum outcomes. The first four layers perform the forward passes by using the least-squared error method while the fifth layer performs the back-pass calculations by using the gradient descent method. The first layer in ANFIS is the input for performing the fuzzification process. In this layer, the input data points were fuzzified by using the Gaussian membership function. The second layer uses the fundamental fuzzy calculations by adopting the “AND” and “OR” functions as specified in the fuzzy logic theory. In the third and fourth layers each rule and the firing power are normalized to ensure that the rule contributions are relative. The fifth layer is where all the incoming signals from the previous layers are summed and converted to a single crisp value to be able to make meaningful evaluations.
The model performance evaluation for artificial intelligence-driven models such as the models employed in the current study was conducted by using the statistical indicator metrics. Although some metrics are available in the literature, root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were utilized in this study due to their popular utilization in the literature.

3. Results

The results obtained from the analysis of the data are structured according to the subheadings. The themes related to language skills in the mathematics curricula of both countries used in the ANN and ANFIS analyses are shown below.

3.1. Findings on Language Skills in Singapore Mathematics Curriculum Outcomes

The outcomes of the Singapore primary mathematics curriculum related to language skills according to grade levels are given in the following tables. As can be seen in Table 4, the largest number of themes related to language skills was included in the topic of “2DShapes”. The minimum number was found in the topic of “Time”.
As can be seen in Table 5, the largest number of themes related to language skills in 2nd grade were included in the topic of “3DShapes”. The minimum number was found in the topic of “Addition and subtraction”.
Table 6 shows that, in the primary 3rd-grade level, the theme most related to language skills was identified in the topic of “Multiplication and division”. This result was followed by the topic of “Numbers up to 10,000” with a frequency of 6. The least possible outcomes associated with language skills were found in the topics of “Addition and Subtraction” and “Angles”.
As can be seen in Table 7, the largest number of themes related to language skills in 4th grade are included in the topics of “Numbers up to 100,000” and “Decimals up to 3 decimal places”. The minimum frequency was found (0) in the topics of “Fractions of a set of objects” and “Angles”.
As can be seen in Table 8, it has been observed that there were no differences in the frequency of the themes in the 5th grade from each other. The minimum frequency was found (1) in the topics of “Ratio”, “Angles”, and “Average of a set of data”.
In Table 8, the largest number of themes related to language skills in 6th grade are included in the topic of “Area and circumference of the circle”. The minimum frequency was found (0) in the topics of “Ratio”, “Algebra”, and “Volume of cube and cuboid”.
As it can be deducted in Table 9, the outcomes of the Singapore primary mathematics curriculum related to language skills at all grade levels, the main focus was observed in the themes of “describing, identifying, working in groups, and explaining”.
The outcomes of the Hong Kong primary mathematics curriculum related to language skills according to grade levels are given in the following tables. In Table 10, the largest number of themes related to language skills was included in the topic of “Shape and Space”. There were no outcomes related to language skills in other topics.
In Table 11, there are no outcomes related to language skills in any subject of the mathematics curriculum at the 4th- to 6th-grade levels.
As can be seen in Table 12, outcomes were determined with language skills, which were different from other levels. Higher numbers of outcomes related to language skills were found in the topics of “Number and Algebra” and “Measures, shape, and space”.
When comparing the Hong Kong mathematics curriculum with the Singapore mathematics curriculum, the themes related to language skills were identified the most in Singapore among mathematics outcomes.

3.2. Findings on the Themes and Number of Outcomes in the Native Language Teaching and Mathematics Programs of the Subject Countries

In this section, the content of the country programs is detailed. The basic language skills included in the native language curriculum are shown. Themes related to language skills were created in mathematics teaching programs.
The number of outcomes in each language skill in the native language curriculum of the subject countries was tabulated. In the same way, the number of mathematics outcomes related to language skills themes in mathematics teaching programs is also shown.
The outcome numbers of each language skill are shown in Table 13. Hong Kong has the highest number of outcomes in listening, reading, and writing skills, while Singapore has the highest number of outcomes in speaking skills. Singapore, which also showed regular success in the field of reading in the PISA exam, showed the least number of outcomes in reading skills in the native language curriculum.
Table 14 shows the number of themes related to language skills obtained from countries’ mathematics programs. In this context, the Singapore mathematics program differed significantly from Hong Kong.
In Figure 1 and Figure 2 below, the weights of the language skills obtained from the above tables were graphically illustrated in a pie chart for Singapore and Hong Kong, respectively.

3.3. Analysis of Data Obtained from Mathematics Teaching Programs Using ANN

The ANN analysis was performed after examining the mathematics teaching programs determined within the scope of the native language education system used in both Hong Kong and Singapore. The results are illustrated in Figure 3 below. Accordingly, one individual model was developed by ANN. In the model, the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores was examined. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2) for the developed model were tabulated and are shown in Table 15.
As can be seen in Figure 3 for Model 1, the R2 was 0.35 in the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores of the subject countries. An insufficient relationship between the variables was observed (linguistic value equivalents of statistical values: 40: insufficient; 55–70: average; 70–80: very good; and 80 and above: superior significance) [22,23]. The RMSE value was 17.6385.

3.4. Analysis of Data Obtained from Mathematics Teaching Programs with ANFIS

The results of the ANFIS analysis using the data obtained from the native language and mathematics teaching programs of the subject countries covered within the scope of the research are illustrated in Figure 4 below. Accordingly, one individual model was developed using ANFIS. In the model, the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores was examined. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2) for the models developed were tabulated and are shown in Table 16.
As can be seen in Figure 4 for Model 2, the R2 was 0.39 in the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores of the subject countries. An insufficient relationship was found between them. The RMSE value was 12.42771.
The relationship between input and output is also given in Figure 5.

3.5. The Findings of the Comparison of ANN and ANFIS Analyses

In this section, the results obtained from the ANN and ANFIS analyses were compared. The results were tabulated in Table 17. Both analysis results indicated that there was an insufficient relationship.
These models, developed in light of data obtained from both the native language and mathematics teaching programs of the countries in question, have shown that the relationship between language and mathematics skills is not only about the teaching programs/curricula.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In the models created for use in the ANN and ANFIS analyses, the number of learning outcomes and codes obtained from the native language teaching and mathematics curricula of both countries are shown in tabular form. When the content analyses in the native language and mathematics teaching programs of the countries covered by the research were examined, as well as the ANN and ANFIS analyses, the following results answered the three research questions of this study:
  • What is the relationship between language skills and mathematics success according to the data obtained from the native language teaching and mathematics teaching programs?
It has been proven in many studies that there is a relationship between language skills and mathematics [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Students’ competence in using their native languages is proportional to their success in mathematics. Despite this, as a result of this study, it has been found that this ratio is associated with educational programs in only one country. Textbooks, teacher activities, teaching materials, and individual differences between students in educational environments outside of educational programs may play a larger role in this relationship.
Compared to the English curriculum and the mathematics curriculum of Singapore, a large number of achievements that can be matched with four language skills in the mathematics curriculum program content were identified. The maximum number of achievements that can be related to language skills in the mathematics curriculum is in grade 2 (f 52). The wider range of subjects compared to the first year shows that the content of the program is concentrated in all respects in the second year [30]. The minimum number of achievements is in grade 6 with a frequency value of 14.
Compared to the Hong Kong English curriculum and the mathematics curriculum, no results parallel to the relationship found in the Singapore example could be reached. Frequency values were found to be “2” at grade levels of 1–3, “0” at grade levels of 4–6, and “8” at the junior grade level in the Hong Kong mathematics program. No relationship between mathematics and native language teaching programs was determined.
According to the data obtained from the content of the English language teaching programs of the subject countries, Hong Kong has the highest number of achievements compared to Singapore. It was determined that the highest number of achievements in the Hong Kong English curriculum is in reading skills. The lowest number of achievements detected in the programs is in the area of reading in Singapore (f 9).
Educational curricula have a very important place under the roof of education. In the research, Saravanan [31] reports how the integration of the mathematics curriculum and the content areas of mathematics through English have changed approaches to teaching and learning. Wong et al. [32] stated that children’s proficiency or inadequacies in mathematics come immediately after English and that studies should be carried out on the mathematics curriculum. Some studies argue that student success has nothing to do solely with the curriculum. Coleman [33] has revealed that student success depends more on family and socio-economic background than on school resources. Hattie [34] has shown that teacher effectiveness has a significant impact on student achievement, but the curriculum accounts for a much smaller part of this impact.
2.
What is the relationship between language and mathematics skills using ANN and ANFIS?
The results obtained for the ANN model demonstrated R2 values as low as 0.35, which indicated that the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores was not significant. On this basis, it can be noted that the content of the mathematics teaching programs of the subject countries and the language skills gains contained in the content do not have significant effects according to the ANN model.
Although the ANFIS model results demonstrated a slightly higher R2 value of 0.39, this outcome is still considered too low to determine the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores.
In addition to the fact that there are studies in which ANN and ANFIS are used in educational sciences, there are also studies of these models included in literature reviews, especially those referenced in this research. The research of Okewu et al. [35] shows that ANN can be applied to educational sciences for analyzing educational data. Kalaycı [36] and Kalaycı Alas [37] analyzed the data obtained from the native language teaching programs of nine countries, including Hong Kong and Singapore, with ANFIS.
3.
What is the comparison of the results obtained from the ANN and ANFIS analyses?
These models, developed in the light of data obtained from both native language and mathematics teaching programs of the countries in question, are two systems rather than a uniform method. Both ANN and ANFIS results have shown that the relationship between language and mathematics skills is not purely related to teaching programs/curricula. This conclusion is drawn from the fact shown in the literature that higher R2 values close to 1 and lower RMSE scores indicate a better model performance. Since both of the model performance metrics were far below the above-mentioned target values, both models were found to be insufficient in terms of finding the relationship between language skills and mathematics.
According to statistical indicator metrics, although both models were not able to explain the relationship between verbal skills and language skills based on the PISA scores, the ANFIS model slightly outperformed the ANN model. This can be justified by the fact that ANFIS models utilize a hybrid modeling technique that combines the advantageous sides of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic theory.
A number of previously published research works that had similar objectives but utilized different methodologies to the current study can be found in the literature. Research conducted by Cheung [38] examined the PISA 2012 Mathematics exam results in East Asian countries such as Singapore and Hong Kong and compared the mathematical competencies of disadvantaged but successful students with advantaged but low-achieving students. The study found that disadvantaged students show higher familiarity with mathematical concepts, experience less math anxiety, and have a higher math self-concept. Another study suggests that speaking a minority language at home has a positive effect on mathematics and reading achievement [39]. On the contrary, it has also been stated that being an immigrant and having a low socio-economic status usually negatively affects mathematics achievement [40]. A study conducted by Cui et al. [41] found that parents’ participation in education in early childhood and positive attitudes towards education positively affect children’s mathematics achievement by increasing their interest in learning. Another study conducted in South Africa showed that students who speak African languages and English well are more successful in mathematics and have an advantage over students who speak other languages [42]. In addition, it has been stated that factors such as socio-economic status, language spoken at home, and perceptions of the importance of mathematics also contribute to mathematics failure
Research conducted in Hong Kong showed that kindergarten students of low socio-economic status experience difficulties in early reading and language skills, which negatively affects their mathematics achievement [43]. English Chinese reading and mathematics skills were examined by Inoue et al. [44] and they found that the ability to understand the structural features of language (morphological awareness) had a significant effect on the overall academic achievement and mathematics performance of children in Hong Kong.
In another study, the influence of switching from Malay to English language education on mathematical success was investigated [45]. It has been observed that the mathematics performance of students declined due to escalated anxiety because of the language change and, as a result, the Malay language was re-adopted in the teaching program. This situation emphasized the importance of education in the mother tongue Lu et al. [46] also stated that the phonological structure of Chinese is related to mathematics achievement, and students who speak Chinese are more successful.
There are also studies that concluded that close relationships between parent–child and teacher–child positively affect children’s mathematical abilities through language skills [47]. In addition, it was concluded that education in the mother tongue is more effective in mathematics achievement [48,49,50,51].
The relationship between language and mathematics achievement cannot be determined by examining the teaching programs alone. The relationship between language and mathematics can be measured by all the elements of a country’s education system and individual differences. Many factors such as classroom programs, curricula, teacher training programs, classroom activities, individual intelligence areas, textbooks, and measurement and evaluation applications are effective in the relationship. In this study, an attempt was made to explore how applications such as ANN and ANFIS can be applied in educational sciences based on teaching programs. Although a number of studies found in the literature have shown that AI techniques can successfully be implemented in education sciences, the poor performance of the model outcomes in the current study may be linked to the lack of amount of data points used [52,53,54]. Additionally, integrated data learning models such as ensemble learning could have achieved better performance scores. Considering the above-mentioned limitations, the authors suggest improvements for future research.
It is also noteworthy to mention that the current study solely focuses on the relationship between language and mathematics skills, which could limit the ability of the models to identify the pattern in the data. However, including additional skills in the models may have improved the model’s performance. Additionally, only two countries’ curricula were investigated and modeled due to their consistency in achieving high PISA scores; however, increasing the number of countries and adding their curriculum in consideration may have a positive influence on the model performance results. The above-mentioned limitations of the current study may have a place in future research as room for development in the field of education and artificial intelligence. The authors strongly encourage future research regarding the application of machine learning tools such as ANN and ANFIS, which were utilized in the current study to ensure the sustainable development of educational programs and curricula. The authors also believe that this pursuit would aid in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4.

Author Contributions

D.K.A. and M.T conceived the original idea. Conceptualization, D.K.A. and M.T.; methodology, D.K.A.; analysis and interpretations, D.K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.A. and M.T.; data curation, D.K.A. and M.T.; review and editing, M.T.; resources, D.K.A. and M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

This research is a document review and does not involve human or animal experiments, therefore an informed consent form was not used.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Butzkamm, W. We only learn language once. The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms: Death of a dogma. Lang. Learn. J. 2003, 28, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morgan, C. “The language of mathematics”: Towards a critical analysis of mathematics texts. Learn. Math. 1996, 16, 2–10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Morgan, C.; Craig, T.; Schütte, M.; Wagner, D. Language and communication in mathematics education: An overview of research in the field. ZDM 2014, 46, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kabakçı, D.A.; Yitmez, B.G.; Faydaoğlu, Ş. Matematiksel Dil İle İlgili Makalelerin İncelenmesi: Bir İçerik Analizi. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2023, 3, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ünver, S.K.; Guzel, E.B. Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının limit öğretimlerindeki matematik dili kullanımları. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2019, 7, 12–28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Öztop, F.; Toptaş, V. Matematik başarısı ile okuduğunu anlama becerisi arasındaki ilişki: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Yıldız J. Educ. Res. 2022, 7, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  7. OECD. PISA: 2018: Insights and Interpretations. 2019. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2023).
  8. Bakioğlu, A.; Göçmen, G. Singapur Sistemi; Bakioğlu, A., Ed.; Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yönetimi PISA’da başarılı ülkelerin eğitim sistemleri içinde (s.127–157); Nobel: Ankara, Turkey, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Education Bureau. Education in Hong Kong. Available online: https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system-policy/primary-secondary/index.html (accessed on 10 December 2023).
  10. Çakıroğlu, M.A.; Erenoğlu, E.; Kasap, S.; Ekiz, Y. Çelik lif katkılı betonların tahribatsız deney yöntemleriyle elde edilen basınç dayanımının ANFIS metoduyla tahmini. SDU Int. Technol. Sci. 2011, 3, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dede, Y. Nitel Yöntemler; Creswell, J.W., Ed.; Research design (S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.) içinde (183-214); Eğiten Kitap: Ankara, Turkey, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yıldırım, A.; Şimşek, H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (9. Baskı); SeçkinYayıncılık: Ankara, Turkey, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Klir, G.J.; Yuan, B. Fuzzy Theory and Applications; Prentice Hall PTR: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Güner, N.; Çomak, E. Lise öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik tutumlarının bulanık mantık yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim. Derg. 2014, 20, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  16. Creswell, J.W. Educational Research; Pearson Education Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fraenkel, R.J.; Wallen, E.N. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Creswell, J.W. Research Design; Demir, S.B., Translator; Eğiten Kitap Yayınları: Ankara, Turkey, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (Ed.) Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri; Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık: Ankara, Turkey, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Al-Hmouz, A.; Shen, J.; Al-Hmouz, R.; Yan, J. Modeling and simulation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for mobile learning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2011, 5, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, J.; Yan, K.; Liu, J.; Zhao, X. Using artificial neural networks to predict the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt shingles. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Taylan, O.; Karagözoğlu, B. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy model for prediction of student’s academic performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 57, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Darman, H.; Musa, S.; Ramasamy, R.; Rajeswari, R. Predicting students’ final grade in Mathematics module using multiple linear regression. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 7, 331–335. [Google Scholar]
  24. Korhonen, J.; Linnanmäki, K.; Aunio, P. Language and mathematical performance: A comparison of lower secondary school students with different level of mathematical skills. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 2012, 56, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alt, M.; Arizmendi, G.D.; Beal, C.R. The relationship between mathematics and language: Academic implications for children with specific language impairment and English language learners. Lang. Speech Hear. Serv. Sch. 2014, 45, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Purpura, D.J.; Ganley, C.M. Working memory and language: Skill-specific or domain-general relations to mathematics? J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2014, 122, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amany, D.A.L.; Puteri, A.A.I.; Karim, S. Analysis of The Relationship Between Student Interest and Written Communication in Solving Realistic Mathematics Problems. Delta-Phi J. Pendidik. Mat. 2023, 1, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kamaruddin, K.; Irvan, I.; Nasution, M.D. The Effectiveness of Think Talk Write (TTW) Learning in Improving Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability. J. Educ. Teach. Learn. (JETL) 2023, 5, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Planas, N.; Pimm, D. Mathematics education research on language and on communication including some distinctions: Where are we now? ZDM–Math. Educ. 2024, 56, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Acar, E.; Ersoy, E.; Eser, N.; Vural, R.A. İlkokul 2. sınıf matematik dersi kapsamında verilen ev ödevlerinin incelenmesi. Bogazici Univ. J. Educ. 2015, 30, 47–85. [Google Scholar]
  31. Saravanan, V. ‘Thinking schools, learning nations’ implementation of curriculum review in Singapore. Educ. Res. Policy Pract. 2005, 4, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, N.Y.; Lam, C.C.; Wong, K.M.; Leung, F.K.S.; Mok, I.A.C. How do Hong Kong students think about the mathematics curriculum and teaching? EduMath 2002, 15, 2–16. [Google Scholar]
  33. Coleman, J.S. Equality of educational opportunity. Integr. Educ. 1968, 6, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hattie, J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  35. Okewu, E.; Adewole, P.; Misra, S.; Maskeliunas, R.; Damasevicius, R. Artificial neural networks for educational data mining in higher education: A systematic literature review. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2021, 35, 983–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kalaycı, D. PISA’da Başarılı Ülkelerin ve Türkiye’nin ana dili Öğretim Programlarının Incelenmesi ve Programların ANFIS ile Analizi. Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kalaycı Alas, D.; Demir, N. Heurıstic Analysis of the Native Language Curriculum of Successful Countries in PISA And Turkey By Using ANFIS. J. Nusant. Stud.-JONUS 2023, 8, 95–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheung, K.C. The effects of resilience in learning variables on mathematical literacy performance: A study of learning characteristics of the academic resilient and advantaged low achievers in Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. Educ. Psychol. 2017, 37, 965–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agirdag, O.; Vanlaar, G. Does more exposure to the language of instruction lead to higher academic achievement? A cross-national examination. Int. J. Biling. 2018, 22, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arikan, S.; Van de Vijver, F.J.; Yagmur, K. PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 2017, 29, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cui, Y.; Zhang, D.; Leung, F.K. The influence of parental educational involvement in early childhood on 4th grade students’ mathematics achievement. In Developing Culturally and Developmentally Appropriate Early STEM Learning Experiences; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; pp. 113–133. [Google Scholar]
  42. Howie, S. System-level evaluation: Language and other background factors affecting mathematics achievement. Prospects 2005, 35, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chung, K.K.H. What are the cognitive-linguistic skills that contribute to academic achievement in Hong Kong kindergarten children with different SES backgrounds? In Proceedings of the 2015 Quality Childhood Conference International (QCCI): “Enhancing Quality Childhood Education: Synergizing Global Efforts”, Hong Kong, China, 18–19 June 2015.
  44. Inoue, T.; Zheng, M.; Ho CS, H.; McBride, C. Predicting the developmental trajectories of Chinese reading, English reading, and mathematics: Evidence from Hong Kong Chinese children. Dev. Psychol. 2023, 59, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Thien, L.M.; Ong, M.Y. Malaysian and Singaporean students’ affective characteristics and mathematics performance: Evidence from PISA 2012. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lu, H.; Leung, F.K.; Fan, Z. Chinese language and students’ mathematics learning: A meta-analysis. ZDM–Math. Educ. 2022, 54, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cui, J.; Lv, L.; Du, H.; Cui, Z.; Zhou, X. Language ability accounts for ethnic difference in mathematics achievement. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 929719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cheung, S.K.; Siu TS, C.; Caldwell, M.P. Mathematical ability at a very young age: The contributions of relationship quality with parents and teachers via children’s language and literacy abilities. Early Child. Educ. J. 2023, 51, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peng, P.; Lin, X.; Ünal, Z.E.; Lee, K.; Namkung, J.; Chow, J.; Sales, A. Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2020, 146, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Van Ryzin, M.J.; Vincent, C.G. Use of native language and culture (NLC) in elementary and middle school instruction as a predictor of mathematics achievement. J. Am. Indian Educ. 2017, 56, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Perez, A.L.; Alieto, E. Change of “Tongue” from English to a Local Language: A Correlation of Mother Tongue Proficiency and Mathematics Achievement. Online Submiss. 2018, 14, 132–150. [Google Scholar]
  52. Do, Q.H.; Chen, J.F. A comparative study of hierarchical ANFIS and ANN in predicting student academic performance. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 2013, 12, 396–405. [Google Scholar]
  53. Daneshvar, A.; Homayounfar, M.; Fadaei Eshkiki, M.; Doshmanziari, E. Developing a Model for Performance Evaluaion of Teachers in Electronic Education System Using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). J. New Approaches Educ. Adm. 2021, 12, 176–190. [Google Scholar]
  54. Göktepe, S.; Yıldız, S.G. Prediction of metacognition awareness of middle school students: Comparison of ANN, ANFIS and statistical techniques. Avrupa Bilim Teknol. Derg. 2022, 38, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Four basic language skills pie charts based on Singapore math program outputs.
Figure 1. Four basic language skills pie charts based on Singapore math program outputs.
Sustainability 16 07806 g001
Figure 2. Four basic language skills pie charts based on Hong Kong math program outputs.
Figure 2. Four basic language skills pie charts based on Hong Kong math program outputs.
Sustainability 16 07806 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between the language themes in mathematics programs and language skills in native language teaching programs of the subject countries based on the PISA scores for model 1.
Figure 3. Relationship between the language themes in mathematics programs and language skills in native language teaching programs of the subject countries based on the PISA scores for model 1.
Sustainability 16 07806 g003
Figure 4. Relationship between the language themes in mathematics programs and language skills in native language teaching programs based on the PISA scores of the subject countries for model 2.
Figure 4. Relationship between the language themes in mathematics programs and language skills in native language teaching programs based on the PISA scores of the subject countries for model 2.
Sustainability 16 07806 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between input and output.
Figure 5. The relationship between input and output.
Sustainability 16 07806 g005
Table 1. Mathematics and reading area rankings by country.
Table 1. Mathematics and reading area rankings by country.
Country201220152018
MathematicsReadingMathematicsReadingMathematicsReading
Singapore2.3.1.1.2.2.
Hong Kong3.3.2.2.4.4.
Table 2. Mathematics and reading scores by country in 2018.
Table 2. Mathematics and reading scores by country in 2018.
Country2018
MathematicsReading
Singapore569548
Hong Kong551524
Table 3. The themes in the mathematics and native language curricula of the subject countries.
Table 3. The themes in the mathematics and native language curricula of the subject countries.
Themes in the Mathematics Curricula
Working in groups
Writing/making a story/making a list
Explaining/discussing/sharing/speaking
Reading
Themes in the Native Language Curricula
Listening
Speaking
Reading
Writing
Table 4. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 1st-grade level by subject.
Table 4. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 1st-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 1st Grade
Numbers up to 100Working in groups, describing2
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups, writing, writing3
Multiplication and divisionSharing, explaining, discussing, sharing4
MoneyCommunicating, sharing, working in groups3
LengthWorking in groups, describing2
TimeTelling1
2DShapesDescribing, identifying, describing, describing, working in groups, working in groups, explaining7
Picture GraphsWorking in groups, answering, discussing, describing, making a story5
27
Table 5. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 2nd-grade level by subject.
Table 5. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 2nd-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 2nd Grade
Numbers up to 100Giving examples, talking, working in groups, counting, explaining, describing6
Addition and subtractionWriting, explaining, working in groups, working in groups4
Multiplication and divisionWorking in groups, explaining, writing, working in groups, sharing5
Fraction of a wholeGiving examples, using language, describing, explaining, explaining6
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups, writing2
MoneyReading, writing, writing, writing, working in groups, creating words6
Length, mass, and volumeWorking in groups, working in groups, explaining, describing4
TimeCounting aloud, reading, telling, giving, writing5
2DShapesDescribing, working in groups, explaining3
3DShapesDescribing, describing, working in groups, working in groups, working in groups, explaining, explaining7
Picture Graphs with scalesWorking in groups, writing, explaining, making a story4
52
Table 6. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 3rd-grade level by subject.
Table 6. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 3rd-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 3rd Grade
Numbers up to 10,000Discussing, working in groups, counting, explaining, using language, describing6
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups, working in groups, discussing3
Multiplication and divisionWorking in groups, making stories, writing, working in groups, writing, reinforcing language, working in groups7
Equivalent fractionsDiscussing, explaining, making a list, working in groups, explaining5
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups1
MoneyDiscussing, working in groups2
Length, mass, and volumeCounting aloud, working in groups, working in groups, working in groups4
TimeDescribing, telling, writing, working in groups4
Area and perimeterExplaining, working in groups, working in pairs3
AnglesUsing language1
Perpendicular and parallel linesGiving examples, explaining, working in pairs, working in pairs4
Bar graphsWorking in groups, discussing, making a story, discussing4
44
Table 7. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 4th-grade level by subject.
Table 7. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 4th-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 4th Grade
Numbers up to 100,000Working in groups, explaining, reading, writing, describing6
Factors and multiplesWorking in groups, making a list, writing3
Four operationsExplaining, working in groups2
Mixed numbers and improper fractionsGiving examples1
Fractions of a set of objects-0
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups1
Decimals up to 3 decimal placesCounting, writing, describing, explaining, writing, determining6
Addition and subtractionWorking in groups, explaining2
Multiplication and divisionWorking in groups1
TimeWriting, reading, writing, describing, working in groups5
Area and perimeterMaking a figure1
Angles-0
Rectangle and squareDescribing, discussing, and working in pairs3
Line symmetryWorking in groups, working in pairs2
Tables and line graphsExplaining, discussing, explaining, discussing4
37
Table 8. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 5th-grade level by subject.
Table 8. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 5th-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 5th Grade
Numbers up to 10 millionDiscussing, reading, writing3
Four operationsExplaining, sharing ideas2
Fraction and divisionWriting, explaining2
Four operationsDiscussing, working in groups2
PercentageTalking, working in pairs, working in groups3
RatioWorking in groups1
RateTalking about, talking2
Area of triangleWorking in groups, explaining2
Volume of cube and cuboidWorking in groups, determining2
AnglesWorking in groups, working in pairs2
TriangleExplaining, describing, explaining3
AnglesDescribing1
ParallelogramDiscussing, explaining2
Average of a set of dataDiscussing1
28
Table 9. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 6th-grade level by subject.
Table 9. Mathematics curriculum of Singapore primary 6th-grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 6th Grade
Four operationsWorking in groups1
PercentageGiving examples, explaining2
Ratio-0
Distance, time, and speedTalking about, discussing, talking about3
Algebra-0
Area and circumference of the circleDescribing, working in pairs, working in groups, working in groups4
Volume of cube and cuboid-0
Special quadrilateralsExplaining1
NetsWorking in groups, discussing2
Pie chartsDiscussing, reading2
14
Table 10. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong primary 1st- to 3rd-grade levels by subject.
Table 10. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong primary 1st- to 3rd-grade levels by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 1st to 3rd Grades
Number-0
Measures-0
Shape and SpaceDescribe, describe2
Data handling-0
2
Table 11. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong primary 4th- to 6th-grade levels by subject.
Table 11. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong primary 4th- to 6th-grade levels by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary 4th to 6th Grades
Number-0
Algebra-0
Measures-0
Shape and space-0
Data handling -0
0
Table 12. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong junior grade level by subject.
Table 12. Mathematics curriculum of Hong Kong junior grade level by subject.
SubjectInferences of Language SkillsFrequency
Primary junior secondary
Number and algebraDescribe1
Measures, shape, and spaceDescribe1
Data handlingDescribe1
Number and algebraJunior senior secondary, describe2
Measures, shape, and spaceDescribe, communicate2
Data handlingDescribe1
8
Table 13. The skills and the number of outcomes in the native language curricula of the subject countries.
Table 13. The skills and the number of outcomes in the native language curricula of the subject countries.
SkillsCountry
SingaporeHong Kong
Listening1017
Speaking1715
Reading928
Writing1317
Table 14. The themes and the number of outcomes in the mathematics curricula of the subject countries.
Table 14. The themes and the number of outcomes in the mathematics curricula of the subject countries.
ThemesCountry
SingaporeHong Kong
Working in groups570
Writing/making a story/making a list270
Explaining/discussing/sharing/speaking10810
Reading40
Table 15. RMSE and R2 values of Model 1.
Table 15. RMSE and R2 values of Model 1.
Model NumberRMSER2
Model 117.63850.353954
Table 16. RMSE and R2 values of Model 2.
Table 16. RMSE and R2 values of Model 2.
Model NumberRMSER2
Model 212.427710.397867
Table 17. Comparison of RMSE and R2 values in the models.
Table 17. Comparison of RMSE and R2 values in the models.
Model NumberRMSER2
ANN Model 117.63850.353954
ANFIS Model 212.427710.397867
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalaycı Alas, D.; Tezer, M. Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System Hybridized Models in the Sustainable Integration of Language and Mathematics Skills: The Case of Singapore and Hong Kong. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177806

AMA Style

Kalaycı Alas D, Tezer M. Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System Hybridized Models in the Sustainable Integration of Language and Mathematics Skills: The Case of Singapore and Hong Kong. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalaycı Alas, Dilan, and Murat Tezer. 2024. "Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System Hybridized Models in the Sustainable Integration of Language and Mathematics Skills: The Case of Singapore and Hong Kong" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop