Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Agricultural Food Retailers’ ESG Activities on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Consumer ESG Perception
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Evaluation of a Game to Foster Sustainable Self-Help and Mutual Help Education for Disaster Prevention
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Innovations of Express Companies: Adoption of Protective Wearable Artificial Intelligence Devices by Couriers

by
Wei Sun
1,
Junghoon Kim
2,* and
Huadong Su
2
1
Management School, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan 467036, China
2
Department of Saemaul Studies and International Development, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8374; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198374
Submission received: 3 September 2024 / Revised: 25 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024

Abstract

:
Providing couriers with wearable artificial intelligence devices to prevent accidents is not only beneficial to the courier’s safety but will also save money in terms of insurance premiums for express companies; therefore, it is worth investigating what factors can influence the acceptance of wearable artificial intelligence devices by couriers. Push–pull–mooring (PPM) theory and affective event theory (AET) are integrated, to test couriers’ adoption of wearable safety detection devices. Social influence, perceived security, personal innovativeness, and affective event reaction are applied to the research model. Questionnaires are distributed among several listed express companies and 263 valid questionnaires are used for empirical testing. Empirical results indicated that social influence, perceived safety, personal innovativeness and affective event reaction are positively related to usage with coefficients 0.218, 0.301, 0.698 and 0.309. Personal innovativeness has positive moderating effects on relationships between affective event reaction, perceived security and usage, with coefficients 0.145 and 0.106; however, it has no significant moderating effect on the relationship between social influence and usage. The research aims to help support the proliferation and adoption of wearable artificial intelligence devices to optimize the current state of the express industry and improve the interaction between couriers and managers, creating an active management strategy that will allow express companies to thrive. The study not only provides insights to help express companies reduce insurance costs, but also provides recommendations for accelerating the company’s environmental, social and governance goals, leading sustainable development and building new corporate value.

1. Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI), once considered a distant dream, has now become a reality. This technology is seamlessly embedded in almost every field worldwide. The latest frontier of artificial intelligence applications is wearable artificial intelligence, which achieves the ultimate goal of the IT industry: miniaturization and enhanced intelligence. Wearable artificial intelligence, or WAI (hereafter), is not only a technological trend, but also a lifestyle trend. It is a multifunctional tool that can meet a wide range of personal needs. Professionals from different industries such as healthcare, logistics, and manufacturing have found wearable artificial intelligence indispensable. Dedicated wearable devices have improved productivity and security, completely changing the way these industries handle tasks. Once a lightweight artificial intelligence device is magnetically attached to a user’s clothing or belt, or integrated into glasses or a helmet, it becomes the user’s artificial intelligence personal assistant. These devices combine proprietary software and OpenAI’s GPT, allowing users to complete various operations, from answering complex questions to monitoring heart rate and blood pressure, all in an instant. If the user needs visual effects, the micro projector can directly project important information onto the customer’s outstretched palm. The courier industry is made up of couriers, goods, logistics chains, and many software systems. The application of WAI is significantly improving the efficiency of sending and receiving couriers, and also bringing more convenience to the work of couriers. In the process of picking and leaving the warehouse, the AI glasses can automatically complete the scanning operation within the field of view. Wearable AI-assisted handling devices can help couriers handle bulky goods. The AI helmet is embedded with an intelligent detection module, which can not only detect the vital signs of the courier, but also integrate a collision detection system, self-sensing taillights, Bluetooth headsets, microphones, etc.
There are currently a wide variety of mature WAI products on the market, such as WHOOP X OpenAI (from WHOOP company in Boston, MA, USA), META Smart glass (from RayBan company in New York, NY, USA), Apple Vision Pro (from APPLE company in Cupertino, CA, USA), Garmin Connect IQ (from Garmin company in Yangzhou, China), Wear-GPT (from Github company in San Francisco, CA, USA), Petey-GPT (from Petey company in Santa Monica, CA, USA), Humane Ai Pin (from Humane company in Washington, DC, USA), etc. For couriers, traditional wearable devices, such as smart bracelets, watches, and glasses are not enough, because the main job of couriers is to drive or carry goods. Couriers often bend over, and frequently drive—two activities that can easily lead to issues such as traffic accidents and muscle strains—therefore, WAI devices for couriers are usually placed on the joints or the waists of work clothes, on glasses, or helmets. Usually, the income of a courier is determined by the quantity of goods delivered, the number of items moved, or the length of driving time undertaken. Therefore, couriers always earn income through prolonged physical labor. Although many previous studies have made efforts to optimize the labor intensity of couriers, such as optimizing routing [1,2], traffic information sharing [3,4], and vehicle problem detection [5,6], there is little research on how to protect the bodies of couriers through WAI. WAI can be fitted into couriers’ belts and hats to automatically detect when couriers are in high-risk postures that can lead to repetitive strain injuries, such as stooping, hyperextending, or twisting. When suspicious or dangerous behavior first occurs, the courier will receive real-time feedback through gentle vibrations, reminding them that they have assumed a high-risk posture and helping them adjust their behavior. The application of WAI can not only help improve the health of couriers by avoiding injuries, but also reduce the compensation costs and insurance expenses of express companies by reducing accidental injuries and accidents.
Although research about couriers is plentiful, most of it is about courier-related information systems [7], courier’s traffic accident compensation [8], courier service design [9], financial benefits [10], courier employment protection [11], and courier work efficiency improvement design [12,13,14]. Although it is difficult to calculate the annual insurance cost of each courier, depending on the size of the company, the amount of money spent on insurance costs each year is huge. That’s why more and more courier companies are introducing WAI devices to reduce the occurrence of accidents, so as to gain the initiative in the price negotiation process with insurance companies. It is important to know that the cost of insurance is determined by the number of accidents occurring and the amount of compensation paid in the past, especially over the previous year. Research on protecting couriers with WAI is still lacking globally. While wearables can bring benefits such as workforce optimization and cost-cutting to couriers, there are barriers to adoption by couriers. First, the wearable device may affect the flexibility of movement. Second, in a hot work environment, couriers may be reluctant to wear these devices. In addition, some couriers may refuse to wear these devices due to privacy concerns. The best way to promote wearables is for couriers to be willing to make changes in their behavior, rather than being forced to wear them only at the direction of their supervisors.
Therefore, the motivation of the study is to investigate the factors that affect the acceptance of WAI by couriers to help express companies interact with employees through WAI to understand when, in what environment, or where couriers are at risk; helping companies redesign workflows. Traditional research always provides suggestions for company development from the perspective of managers, while the objective of this study is to start from the perspective of couriers and discover factors that affect their acceptance of WAI through questionnaires, in order to better protect the mental and physical health of couriers. The traditional management model is that the company tells the courier what to do. However, this research is intended to help couriers to use big data to tell the company what to do through WAI devices. The purpose of this study is to help couriers better accept WAI, reduce the risk of accidental injury, and thus reduce the high insurance costs that express companies spend on couriers every year. The value of this study is to prove that logistics wearable artificial intelligence devices can improve the work efficiency and accuracy of logistics workers, and will become one of the indispensable technical tools in modern logistics management. This is because, in the future, with the development of science and technology and the improvement of artificial intelligence, more kinds of logistics artificial wearable devices will be used in the logistics industry, which will profoundly change the traditional logistics management method.

2. Literature Review

With the continuous development of technology, smart wearable devices have become a common technology product in today’s society. These smart wearable devices include smart wristbands, smart watches, smart glasses, etc. They provide convenience and support for personal health management by integrating various sensors and health monitoring functions. More and more people choose to wear smart wearable devices to better manage their health. The main functions of smart wearable devices include health monitoring, exercise tracking, sleep monitoring, etc. The health monitoring function can monitor and record individual health data in real time, such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen, etc., through integrated sensors and data analysis technology. The exercise tracking function can track exercise-related data such as step count and calorie expenditure, helping individuals to keep track of their exercise situation. The sleep monitoring function can monitor and analyze sleep quality by wearing smart wearable devices, providing suggestions for improving sleep quality.
The shortage of skilled couriers can lead to income losses caused by knowledge loss, decreased productivity, and equipment downtime. The operation of heavy equipment requires a combination of professional knowledge and skills, and requires a lot of time to learn. The WAI solution integrates a deep knowledge network that records key data used by senior couriers to make real-time decisions and enable new employees to quickly, effectively, and securely get started. Artificial intelligence is equipped with machine learning and deep learning algorithms, enabling transportation and wearable devices to make real-time decisions and autonomously execute tasks, which is particularly valuable in emergency situations that require rapid response. Predictive maintenance becomes possible through wearable devices that support intelligent real-time decision-making by couriers. Monitoring the performance of intelligent devices and vehicles can minimize the risk of unexpected failures. This improves device efficiency and eliminates the need for manual tracking and simplified operations. In summary, smart wearable devices have brought unprecedented convenience and benefits to personal health management, enabling real-time monitoring and recording of individual health data.
Many existing studies mainly focus on the acceptance of wearable devices by the elderly, and on the Internet of Things; Table 1 shows the details of these studies.
As can be seen from the studies in Table 1, the most advanced research on WAI devices is focused on Internet of Things, wearable adoption, and healthcare WAI device adoption. However, such research still lacks professionalism and meticulousness, and cannot be applied to the courier industry. Compared with general consumers, a professional population such as that of couriers is less sensitive to the price of WAI devices, because the company will bear this cost in order to reduce injury compensation, improve labor efficiency and reduce insurance cost. More importantly, the functions of courier WAI devices are different from Internet of Things and healthcare WAI devices. They are specially designed for the safety and protection of specific types of work of couriers. Therefore, due to the lack of research on WAI devices by couriers, it is necessary to conduct research to discover what factors can affect the acceptance of wearable devices by couriers. Because WAI devices are the latest technology, two theories were chosen to explain its receptive behavior, namely affective event theory and push–pull–mooring theory.

2.1. Affective Event Theory

Affective event theory is widely used in research on the acceptance of various techniques. Affective event theory is about how events change a person’s emotions to affect work behaviors over time. The theory has two core concepts. The first is an almost automatic emotional response resulting from affective-driven behavior. The second is about how cognition and attitudes can influence people’s judgmental behavior. Lam and Chen (2012) [23] test hotel employees’ emotional labors based on affective event theory. Guenter et al. (2014) [24] use affective event theory to explore the information exchange delay’s negative impact among employees. Luo and Chea (2018) [25] test factors that affect websites’ success or failure according to affective events theory. Sarker et al. (2019) [26] apply affective event theory to explore factors related to affective reaction of transit systems. Mi et al. (2021a) [27] introduce affective event theory to test factors affecting environmental citizenship behavior. Lee et al. (2021) [28] apply affective event theory to find out how tourists respond to service failure. Mi et al. (2021b) [29] use affective event theory to test factors related to public environmental behavior. It is necessary to choose the appropriate theory to design a model of courier acceptance of WAI devices. Traditional research focuses on the impact of courier work environment characteristics on satisfaction, while affective event theory takes events that occur at work as the direct cause of emotional responses. Affective event theory does not ignore the role of work environment characteristics, but believes that these characteristics affect emotional experiences more or less through work events. WAI devices are new and can be placed in a courier’s helmet, hat, clothing, or shoes; which is likely to be uncomfortable for the courier. When couriers wear WAI devices, outsiders may also question these devices and may make positive or negative comments, which can affect the courier’s mood and thus affect the courier’s acceptance of WAI devices.

2.2. Push-Pull-Mooring Theory

Although affective event theory can well explain couriers’ emotional acceptance of wearable devices, it cannot explain which factors promote couriers’ acceptance of wearable devices, which hinder couriers’ acceptance of wearable devices, and which can moderate the acceptance behavior of the courier towards the wearable device. In the 1960s, during the 20th century, the American scholar E.S. Lee proposed a systematic theory of population migration–push–pull theory. For the first time, he divided the factors that affect migration and divided it into two aspects: pushing and pulling. In his view, pushing factors motivate migrants to leave their places of origin. Pulling factors attract migrants with a desire to improve their lives to move into new places of residence. Pushing, pulling, and mooring theory was originally used to explain the influencing factors of migration from one geographic area to another. Pushing means factors that encourage people to abandon their current place, pulling refers to the attractiveness of a new choice, whereas mooring indicates factors that moderate pushing and pulling behaviors. In terms of couriers’ adoption of WAI devices, pushing means factors that emotionally affect couriers’ acceptance of WAI devices. Pulling indicates factors promoting and encouraging their acceptance of WAI devices technically. Mooring means factors moderating those pushing and pulling factors. Lots of previous research has applied pulling, pushing, and mooring theory to test all kinds of acceptances in different research areas. Wang et al. (2020) [30] apply push–pull–mooring theory to green transportation research. Tang and Chen (2020) [31] explore factors related to un-following brand micro-blogs in a push–pull–mooring model. Al-Mashraie et al. (2020) [32] apply push–pull–mooring theory to telecommunication industry research. Liu et al. (2021) [33] explore users’ switching intention to paid social question-and-answer services. Zhang et al. (2021) [34] use push–pull–mooring theory to understand users’ switching behavior to peer-to-peer accommodation. Frasquet and Miquel-Romero (2021) [35] introduce push–pull–mooring theory to show-rooming research. Zeng et al. (2021) [36] test factors related to the adoption of land information systems in a push–pull–mooring framework. Wang et al. (2021) [37] use a push–pull–mooring view to test factors related to technology-dependent shopping behavior. Kim (2021) [38] use qualitative method to find push–pull–mooring factors are useful in predicting users’ switch behavior in fitness. Ghufran et al. (2022) [39] test factors affecting users’ adoption of organic food based on push–pull–mooring theory.
The two theories are chosen from among the entire range of concepts, because the push–pull theory acts as a bridge between the courier’s desire for safety and the company’s concern for sustainability. The application of push–pull theory makes the design of the research model closer to the common needs of the two, because the widespread application of WAI equipment in couriers is not accidental, but the result of the interaction between the internal psychological motivation of couriers and the company’s driving force to improve management efficiency. Affective event theory is used to explore the relationship between the emotional events experienced and the emotional responses generated by the couriers at work, and their attitudes and behaviors. Bringing this theory to a research model can identify the various factors that contribute to the emotional responses of couriers and understand how these emotional responses affect their attitudes and behaviors. The combination of these two theories emphasizes demand-driven research from the courier’s point of view, which is particularly useful for research, such as improving the quality of WAI equipment, optimizing software services, and reducing the cost of insurance for companies. The combination strategy provided by these two theories is not only helpful to enhance the competitiveness of express companies, but also conducive to the sustainable improvement of enterprise management level.
The advantage of the combination of the two theories is not only that they are considered to be inseparable from the behavior of couriers, but also that the two theories are widely applicable and can measure couriers’ behavior from multiple perspectives. Although these two theories are often independently applied to research in various disciplines, this study believes that the application of WAI devices to couriers is a new way of improving productivity, and the application of this new scientific research requires the use of high-performance theory to measure it. Based on the above two theories and the literature review of WAI device applications, the following hypotheses and research models will be given in this study.

3. Hypothesis

Affective event theory indicates that an event that evaluates and responds to work-related events, goals, and events that stimulate short-lived or persistent stimuli is an affective event. Affective event reactions can be divided into two types: negative or positive affective events reactions. In the progression to adoption of WAI devices, they may have relatively large emotional fluctuations and psychological imbalances. The excitement of couriers may be caused by positive emotional events, while emotions such as sadness, fear, and anger are usually caused by negative emotional events. Negative affective events could have a greater impact on individual emotions and a longer impact time than positive affective events, which may lead to counterproductive work behavior or service failure [23,24,28]. Most couriers are not highly educated, so learning how to use WAI devices properly can be difficult and time consuming. Because courier work is busy and tiring, most couriers may be opposed to unpaid WAI device training. In some cases, WAI devices are an additional burden for the courier, which may add weight to the garment or cause a certain degree of inconvenience to daily work. Although WAI devices are helpful in protecting them from accidents, the invasion of personal privacy by wearable devices may also cause negative emotional responses in couriers. In conclusion, affective event reaction is a pushing factor that makes couriers have positive and negative emotional responses to wearable devices, and these responses push couriers to release their emotions and guide administrators to continuously improve the user experience. As long as the WAI device is designed to be convenient enough and the express company provides patient training to the courier, couriers are likely to have a positive reaction towards accepting the WAI device. Quite a few studies have applied affective event reaction to different research models [25,26,40]. According to the above discussion, the affective event reaction of couriers may have a positive impact on acceptance behavior, therefore:
H1: 
Affective event reaction positively affects couriers’ WAI devices usage.
Couriers often encounter dangerous situations due to long hours of driving, walking, and carrying goods. WAI devices are specifically designed to inform couriers how to take precautions when faced with dangerous situations. WAI devices can automatically detect high-risk postures that can lead to repetitive strain injury, unsafe driving behaviors, or physiological indicators including heart rate and blood pressure. When these data parameters are abnormal, first, couriers receive real-time feedback through gentle vibrations, alerting them to imminent danger. In addition, the data are shipped to a cloud-based web dashboard that can be used by courier engineers and administrators to suggest improvements to high-frequency problems. When encountering difficulties, couriers can also communicate with ChatGPT 4.0 to receive timely advice. Because these measures are to ensure the safety of couriers, perceived security is a pulling factor which may pull couriers to use wearable devices. When the perceived security of couriers improves, they are more willing to accept WAI devices. Perceived security is a popular factor in different research fields, including crime prevention [41], aggressive behavior prevention [42], city park construction [43], transport policy [44], mobile banking adoption [45], and investment [46]. Thus:
H2: 
Perceived security positively affects couriers’ WAI devices usage.
Nowadays, in the WAI device market, new AI products emerge in an endless stream, penetrating into every aspect of life. Among them, AI products that can be worn on the body have also appeared. For example, sports bracelets, smart watches, Google’s Glass project, and Microsoft’s Hololens, and medical equipment; these not only bring fresh life experience, but also solve people’s actual needs and improve quality of life. Relying on the development of ChatGPT, WAI products have gradually entered people’s lives. WAI products are directly connected to the human body, which may test people’s personality, bone age, gender and taste. Since WAI devices are becoming emotional fashion items, social influence is also becoming a pulling factor, which may pull couriers to adopt it. In the era of the Internet of Everything, it will certainly become a trend of the future in the fashion industry. The huge social influence of WAI devices has also contributed to its acceptance by couriers. Social influence is a traditional factor in many research fields, including mobile banking payment [47,48], technology adoption [49], and mobile shopping [50]. Therefore:
H3: 
Social influence positively affects couriers’ WAI devices usage.
In the era of knowledge, personal innovativeness ability may change a person’s cultivation, thinking, and destiny. Personal innovativeness ability is also one of the basic qualities of a modern outstanding talent. Personal innovativeness is often inseparable from a good professional foundation and experimental skills. Thus, having a good professional theory and knowledge level as the guarantee, and being good at learning and trying new things will better help couriers accept WAI devices. Usually, individuals with higher personal innovation are more receptive to new AI technologies such as ChatGPT. Personal innovativeness is such a useful pulling factor that many previous studies have used personal innovativeness to test adoption behavior in various research fields, including mobile payment [51], upscale restaurant development [52], social commerce [53], and artificial intelligence [54]. Based on all the above discussion, it can be concluded that:
H4: 
Personal innovativeness positively affects couriers’ WAI devices usage.
Shaw and Sergueeva (2018) [55] apply personal innovativeness as a moderator to research mobile commerce. Sun et al. (2020) [56] find personal innovativeness can effectively moderate the intention behavior in investment decisions. Khazaer and Tareq (2021) [57] use personal innovativeness as a moderator to test the intention to use electric cars. All of this previous research indicates that personal innovativeness may also moderate other relationships in this research, making it a mooring factor that moderates pushing factors, pulling factors, and usage. When couriers perceive more personal innovativeness, they will face affective events positively and optimistically, and may try a variety of ways to solve difficulties. Innovative couriers may actively cooperate with the company for their own job safety, and become proficient in using WAI devices while ensuring their own safety. Similarly, couriers with more innovativeness may be more receptive to external positive encouragement and influence, which contributes to the acceptance of WAI devices. Based on the above, it is concluded that:
H5: 
Personal innovativeness positively moderates the relationship between affective event reaction and couriers’ WAI devices usage.
H6: 
Personal innovativeness positively moderates the relationship between perceived security and couriers’ wearable WAI usage.
H7: 
Personal innovativeness positively moderates the relationship between social influence and couriers’ wearable WAI usage.
Figure 1 is the research model.
The affective event theory plays a key role in the research model by using the affective event reaction factor. Perceived security and social influence are workplace environment factors. Personal innovativeness is regarded as a kind of attitude factor. Behavior is a kind of usage factor. Push–pull–mooring theory gives a structure to this research, whereas affective event theory defines the factors of the research model.

4. Methods

4.1. Research Design and Data Collection

This survey is a marketing exercise that addresses couriers’ wearing preferences, so there is no medical information in this study. A compliant questionnaire must comply with legal procedures and ethical constraints. In all procedures during this research, relevant guidelines and regulations were well enforced. Anyang Institute of Technology’s ethics committee has approved all questionnaire protocols, including those involving various ethical conduct and any relevant details. Informed consent was obtained from all participating couriers.
We conducted a pre-test survey of 51 courier volunteers to improve the reliability and validity of the survey. Based on the results of the pre-test, we made minor adjustments to the content of the questionnaire in preparation for large-scale questionnaire distribution. Then, with the help of the ZTO Express Company, the questionnaires were distributed in four capital cities (Zhengzhou, Wuhan, Hefei, and Jinan) in different provinces of China. Because couriers participated anonymously, the researchers did not have access to any personal information about the participants. The questionnaire is filled out online, and the courier enters the questionnaire-filling system by scanning the QR code. Each fully filled questionnaire entitled the courier to a movie coupon. The questionnaire survey started on 8 May 2023 and ended on 22 May 2023. A total of 316 questionnaires were received, of which incomplete questionnaires and invalid questionnaires were issued, and 263 valid questionnaires remained.

4.2. Measurement

The effect and extent of social influence are conditioned by the communicator. The communicator’s trustworthiness, charisma, communication skills, and status in the courier’s mind will affect how well the courier interprets them. The subjective state of the courier, such as intelligence level and personality characteristics, also has a certain impact on the degree of acceptance. According to this idea, three items are used to measure social influence according to Grob (2018) [50]. Perceived security is the process of courier cognition and judgment of safety or unsafe factors in the use of WAI. It involves the judgment and assessment of the degree of danger, safety status and potential risks of the environment in which the courier is located in the use of WAI. Perceived security is a subjective feeling of the courier and is influenced by individual differences, experience, and knowledge. Based on this idea, three items are used to measure perceived security according to Sun et al. (2021) [58]. Rational use of WAI may bring couriers more autonomy in their work, opportunities for promotion, and high income, among other things. Couriers can experience both hassles and negative incidents from using WAI, as well as uplifting events. Therefore, three items are used to measure affective event reaction, according to Luo and Chea (2018) [25]. In the process of using WAI, couriers find and try new skills through observation, experience, association, thinking, and so on, to improve their acceptance of WAI. The application of WAI is a new challenge for couriers, and those who are willing to try new things may have an easier time mastering the skills of using WAI. Thus, three items are used to measure personal innovativeness, according to Gansser et al. (2021) [54]. Three items are used to measure usage according to Wu et al. (2022) [59]. All the items are scored using the 7-Likert scale.
Smart-PLS 4.0 is statistical analysis software for partial least squares structural equation modeling, which is flexible and easy to use [60]. It is generally used in management, organizational behavior, and information systems. It has the following advantages: it helps users to create a good path model; it is easy to create adjustment variables; it can quickly generate path coefficients based on data, and it generates system data reports completely and accurately; it performs better when the sample size is small or the data do not follow a multivariate normal distribution, as it has looser requirements for data and is more robust [61]. Therefore, Smart-PLS is used as the main tool to test research data. Demographic statistics are shown in Table 1. Table 2 indicates that most couriers are male and only 24.8% are female. Most of them have high school or bachelors degree and only a few have masters degree. Most of couriers are young and their yearly incomes are mainly lower than USD 20,000. All of them have the experience of using WAI devices.

5. Results

In structural equation model testing, the reliability and validity of the model should be tested first. In Table 3, Cronbach’s alpha is a statistic for testing reliability, which refers to the average of the half–half reliability coefficients obtained by all possible item division methods of the scale, and is the most commonly used reliability measurement method. Composite Reliability refers to the consistency of the internal variables of the facet. Generally, both Cronbach’s alpha value and composite reliability value should be greater than 0.7 [62,63]. Average variance extracted (AVE), as showed in Table 3, is used to test discriminant validity, which refers to the degree to which a construct is truly distinguished from other facets according to empirical criteria. To receive a satisfied validity, the AVE value should be greater than 0.5 [62]. In Table 3, both of their values are higher than 0.7, therefore the model’s reliability is supported. In addition, all the AVE values are higher than 0.5.
In Table 4, The Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) is the ratio between and within traits used to test the discriminant validity of research models [64]. Heterogeneous-elemental ratio (HTMT) is the ratio that measures the correlation between different facet indicators and the same facet index to evaluate the differentiation between facets. The HTMT value is calculated as the ratio of heterogeneous correlation to elemental heterogeneous correlation. Theoretically, to demonstrate discriminative validity, the HTMT value should be small, indicating significant facet-to-facet differences. Table 4 and Table 5 present the progress of discriminant validity testing. All values in Table 4 are less than the threshold of 0.85, while all values in Table 5 are less than the threshold of 1.0. Therefore, the discriminant validity of the model is supported.
After the validity and reliability of the research model are supported, related empirical test results are shown in Figure 2. It gives that H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 are all supported with p value less than 0.05. Unfortunately, H7 is not supported with a p value greater than 0.05 [65]. The path coefficient between personal innovativeness and usage is 0.698, which is the highest path coefficient of all. Affective event reaction positively affects usage with path coefficient 0.309. The path coefficient between perceived security and usage is 0.301. Social influence positively affects usage with path coefficient 0.218. Personal innovativeness positively moderates the relationship between affective event reaction and usage with path coefficient 0.145. Personal innovativeness positively moderates the relationship between perceived security and usage with path coefficient 0.106. Personal innovativeness does not moderate the relationship between social influence and usage. All the structural results are indicated in Figure 2. When couriers’ personal innovativeness is high, both affective event reaction and perceived security are associated with a higher level of usage, whereas social influence makes no difference. R-squared is the coefficient of determination. It reflects the proportion of the total variance of the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variable through the regression relationship. The R-squared value in this model is 0.714, which means that the regression relationship can explain 71.4% of the variance of the dependent variable.

6. Discussion

Traditional research on express delivery services mainly includes the quality of express delivery services [66], user satisfaction [67], adoption of delivery apps [68], improvement of express delivery technology [69], service comparison [70], and after-service quality [71]. With the continuous development of logistics and the popularization of online shopping, couriers send and receive a large number of parcels every day, running at the front line. The heavy workload and direct contact with a large number of goods make safety of couriers a very important new topic for research. Benefiting from years of technological accumulation in various fields such as the Internet of Things, cloud computing, big data, block-chain, and artificial intelligence, many express delivery companies are using wearable technology to protect their couriers, increase technological innovation and application pace, improve logistics timeliness, and reward couriers who deliver goods safely and efficiently for a long time. The currently popular wearable artificial intelligence terminals consist of smart watches, smart glasses, smart helmets, smart jackets, scanners, and Bluetooth earphones. Compared with traditional protection measures, WAI devices have the characteristics of high efficiency, small size, and portability. WAI devices not only have protective functions, but can also perform operations such as contacting customers, modifying information, and signing for customers through voice communication. The WAI device is also embedded with a logistics map, making path planning clear at a glance and visualizing the entire process of receiving and dispatching. The monitoring function of WAI can also serve as evidence to reward couriers who have made significant contributions in service quality, social responsibility, innovation, and development. WAI devices are also playing an increasingly important role in enhancing the job competitiveness of female and elderly couriers, as they can greatly reduce labor intensity, enable female and elderly employees to handle long-term sustainable heavy cargo transportation work, and reduce the occurrence of unintentional injuries.
An increasing number of express delivery companies have found that data collected from WAI devices can predict diseases and accidents, and the use of wearable devices by couriers to improve their health beyond exercise will become a new trend. Express delivery companies can save a significant amount of insurance investment in a positive cycle between equipment, health promotion, rewards, and premium discounts, with WAI devices. The application of WAI devices is a win–win strategy for express delivery companies and insurance companies. As an indispensable link in the health management chain, insurance is making innovative predictions and guidance on the behavior of those insured—with the help of artificial intelligence, WAI devices, and other technologies—taking prevention as the principle, reducing the incidence rate, and reducing the risk level of both the insured and the insurance company at the same time. The application of wearable devices, the addition of data and health management, and the two-way demand of insurance and express companies are an undeniable force in the future for the health industry. From a longer-term perspective, the insurance industry in the future cannot only remain in the function of risk transfer. Only by endowing users with more value and significance can it go further, and only by more effectively helping its customers achieve healthier lives can it maintain sustained competitiveness.
A thorough analysis of the use of WAI devices reveals that different courier companies’ WAI devices come from different sources, such as insurance companies, technology companies, or government designated companies. Insurance companies can offer high discounts to courier companies that use designated brands of WAI equipment and software, so that insurance companies can not only earn profits from premiums but also receive commissions from selling WAI equipment and software, ensuring the safety and stability of profits. Since the number of WAI devices used by express delivery companies of different scales varies, insurance companies can require express delivery companies to keep the usage of WAI devices confidential in order to take the initiative in price negotiations with other express delivery companies. In addition, some governments may provide tax refunds to courier companies that purchase WAI equipment produced by local enterprises. Although this commercial behavior is suspected of local protectionism and unfair competition, it is helpful in increasing local employment and promoting the development of WAI equipment production enterprises.

7. Implications

7.1. Theoretical Implications

The PPM theory comes from demography, while the AET theory comes from psychology. This study innovatively designed a research model using the two theories. The model results show that two theories can effectively explain the level of acceptance of WAI devices by couriers. The courier chooses a certain WAI device service because of inherent needs, which is a profit-driven performance. When the WAI device service cannot satisfy the courier in certain aspects, the courier may inevitably abandon it and look for alternatives. The research results show that most WAI services can meet the main needs of couriers, including emotional event reaction, innovation needs, security needs, and social influence. This fully demonstrates that when a single theory is unable to measure people’s acceptance of the latest technology, the combination of the two theories can not only compensate for this deficiency, but may also enhance the reliability and validity of the research model. The results of this study provide a new attempt for future interdisciplinary research, which combines various theories from different disciplines to explain the latest social phenomena, products, and technologies.
Traditional theoretical integration generally adds some new research variables to the original model to better explain the behavior of the research object, but rarely classifies the research variables. For example, the Technology Acceptance Model that emerged in the 1980s is often used to add new variables to target different subjects. Although the results of the empirical study have also proved to be reliable, the acceptance of WAI devices in this study involves insurance company management strategies, courier management strategies, price negotiations, courier behavior, and related policy development. Traditional research methods can struggle to explain the latest and most complex technological frontiers of our time. In this research, we first combined personal innovativeness, perceived security and social influence with AET theory as the basic research model, and then classified each variable according to the PPM theory. In other words, the AET theory is the basis for variable selection, while the PPM theory is the basis for model structure shaping. This kind of theoretical integration thought breaks through the tradition and makes a new successful attempt. This idea may encourage more exploration and innovation in the classification of variables in future research.

7.2. Practical Implications

Affective event reaction, as a pushing factor, positively affects usage, which means both couriers’ positive and negative affective reactions should be carefully considered by courier companies. Express delivery companies and WAI device manufacturers must collect couriers’ affective reactions and try to give a proper response. When couriers give a positive affective reaction, express delivery companies may encourage them and reward them. If couriers give a negative affective reaction, express delivery companies and WAI device manufacturers should find a solution to the problem and implement it as soon as possible to avoid accidental injury to couriers. Express delivery companies could develop rehabilitation plans for different couriers based on feedback from WAI devices, such as waist training, shoulder massage, knee treatment, and psychological counseling. All these efforts may bring better affective reactions from couriers, thereby increasing couriers’ acceptance of WAI devices. Although these behaviors seem to increase the cost of express delivery companies, compared with high insurance investment and accident compensation, it is fairly reasonable and affordable.
Perceived security, as pulling factor, affects usage positively, which suggests that companies should focus more on the functionality of WAI devices that improve courier safety, rather than using WAI devices to monitor courier productivity. The express company should not only buy personal accident insurance for couriers, but also should negotiate with the insurance company to design insurance for some specific high-frequency accidental injuries sustained by couriers, based on feedback data from WAI devices. The feedback WAI data can help express delivery companies to develop accurate insurance purchase plans and require insurance companies to customize insurance for different types of couriers. These measures that can improve the perceived safety of couriers may pull up their enthusiasm for work.
Since social influence, as pulling factor, has a positive impact on usage, express delivery companies could increase the promotion of the advanced nature of WAI devices, and combine social media to promote WAI devices among couriers as a fashionable, avant-garde and practical technology. While WAI devices may add weight or thickness to overalls, express delivery companies and WAI device manufacturers need to popularize the idea among couriers that WAI devices are used to protect couriers rather than supervise their work. Express delivery companies should reward grassroots employees who adopt a welcoming attitude towards WAI devices, as their behavior can influence more people around them. The managers or executives may wear WAI devices to work with ordinary employees, or invite celebrities to wear the same WAI devices as models for publicity.
Personal innovativeness, as a mooring factor, not only has a positive effect on usage, but also has a positive moderating effect on relationships between affective event, perceived security and usage. This indicates that increasing personal innovativeness can encourage couriers’ adoption of WAI devices greatly. According to AET theory, the use of WAI may bring both hassles and uplifts to couriers. For a moderating effect between affective event reaction and usage, companies can strengthen rewards for couriers using WAI devices, such as shortening work hours or providing more holidays, in order to create a relaxed and innovative work atmosphere for couriers. With the help of WAI devices, managers can reduce traditional supervision of courier work, increase their enthusiasm and bring more uplifts on adoption of WAI. Considering moderating effect between perceived security and usage, managers can not only develop management systems and insurance premiums based on real-time feedback from WAI devices, but also discover high-quality couriers who use WAI and encourage them to share their experience, thereby improving couriers’ perceived security on adoption of WAI. Furthermore, couriers could determine their vacation, work intensity, physical examination items, and career planning based on feedback data from WAI, thereby increasing their acceptance of WAI. Last but not least, companies should give couriers sufficient autonomy to use WAI devices. While some innovative couriers may try new tricks on how to use the equipment, these beneficial attempts should be encouraged rather than punished, even if the performance of these devices may be challenging.
WAI is not only composed of AI glasses, helmets, watches, clothing, and external skeletons, but also a huge information management system as the management center. Therefore, the company should invest more manpower and financial resources to optimize the WAI management system, and design a humanized system by collecting the daily data of couriers, so as to reduce insurance costs while protecting the health of couriers and improving their work enjoyment. Although the purchase of WAI equipment and management system developing can greatly reduce insurance costs in the long run, the large short-term investment may lead to resistance from the company’s management. However, the reality is that with rising labor and insurance costs, the application of AI equipment may be a key factor in the competition between express companies in the future.
When challenges and opportunities coexist, the large express companies can join forces to develop WAI industry standards and negotiate with insurance companies to obtain larger concessions. WAI industry standards should be able to enhance the personal innovativeness of the couriers, bring them a positive emotional experience, and give WAI a good reputation among the couriers.

8. Conclusions

Insurance costs are a significant part of the annual financial budget of express delivery companies. Every year, there are also some couriers who get injured or encounter traffic accidents during work. The emergence of WAI devices is aimed at reducing company insurance costs and the frequency of accidents for couriers. Express delivery companies can regularly train couriers on the use of WAI equipment to help them better understand how to avoid risks on the job. WAI devices not only support efficient information communication, map navigation, and artificial intelligence chat to help couriers improve work efficiency, but also can detect heart rate status, analyze labor intensity, identify incorrect handling postures, and provide risk behavior reminders in real time. Through the analysis and pattern recognition of health and exercise data, WAI devices can provide more accurate and personalized work advice and labor intensity analysis, greatly reducing the insurance costs of express companies. In order to better promote WAI devices, it is recommended that the government provides tax exemptions or subsidies for companies that purchase WAI devices for couriers. The customization capability of WAI devices will become even more important. Designers should help couriers set up the features they need, and filter and disable unnecessary features to save power and enhance their own safety. The personal privacy of couriers should also be respected and protected. Wearable devices should not monitor and record information that couriers believe should not be made public, such as personal phone numbers, resting behavior, religious behavior, or any information that assesses personal intelligence. Designers can also design more ergonomic garments and accessories that integrate smart sensors that are convenient for couriers to work with and monitor their biometrics and surroundings in real time. Designers can optimize the user interface and user experience to ensure that couriers can easily interact with WAI devices, receive timely alerts and health reminders, and reduce the additional risk of manipulation complexity. The application of WAI devices for couriers can greatly promote the sustainable development of the express delivery industry, such as delivering goods to previously inaccessible remote areas, helping to improve consumption levels in remote areas, improving the efficiency of courier work, and reducing waste of human and insurance resources, which could become a means of achieving the sustainable development goals of the express delivery industry.

9. Limitations and Future Research

While the questions discussed in this study attempt to cover all aspects of courier acceptance of WAI devices, there are still some limitations. First, the object of this study is limited to Chinese couriers, thus ignoring the preference of foreign couriers for WAI devices. Therefore, future research should be conducted with couriers in more countries around the world. Second, this study focuses on couriers at the grassroots level, ignoring the opinions of senior executives of express delivery companies. Since senior managers have the authority to purchase and manage WAI devices, future research should be conducted with them. Additionally, insurance companies’ databases contain a vast amount of courier compensation data, which can help designers create WAI devices that are more suitable for manual workers. Future research can conduct big data mining on various data of insurance companies to discover the most useful data for designers to develop better WAI devices for couriers. Furthermore, this research is limited to the data of the express delivery industry, which does not fully reflect the application of WAI equipment to all companies; therefore, future research can formulate effective rules for the exchange of data for different types of industries, so as to better promote the adoption of WAI equipment to other industries such as the sports, medical, and transportation industries. Finally, this study ignores the research on the universality of the operating system of WAI devices. In fact, the wide variety of WAI devices on the market should eventually move towards a consistent hardware and software design such as AI phones, so as to facilitate users to choose the right WAI device according to their own needs; therefore, future research may be dedicated to the development of an open operating system for WAI devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, W.S. and J.K.; methodology, J.K.; software, H.S.; validation, W.S. and J.K.; formal analysis, H.S.; investigation, J.K.; resources, W.S.; data curation, J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.S.; writing—review and editing, J.K.; visualization, J.K.; supervision, W.S.; project administration, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asghari, M.; Deng, D.; Shahabi, C.; Demiryurek, U.; Li, Y. Price-aware Realtime Ride-sharing at Scale: An Auction-based Approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. SIGSPACIAL ’16, Burlingame, CA, USA, 31 October–3 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Kanj, L.; Nascimento, J.; Powell, W.B. Approximate Dynamic Programming for Planning a Ride-Sharing System using Autonomous Fleets of Electric Vehicles. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 284, 1088–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ota, M.; Vo, H.; Silva, C.; Freire, J. A scalable approach for data-driven taxi ride-sharing simulation. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 29 October–1 November 2015; pp. 888–897. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jia, Y.; Xu, W.; Liu, X. An Optimization Framework for Online Ride-Sharing Markets. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Atlanta, GA, USA, 5–8 June 2017; pp. 826–835. [Google Scholar]
  5. Masoud, N.; Jayakrishnan, R. A real-time algorithm to solve the peer-topeer ride-matching problem in a flexible ridesharing system. Transportation Research. Part B Methodol. 2017, 106, 218–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y.; Qian, Y.; Yao, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, H.; Xu, Y. Can sophisticated dispatching strategy acquired by reinforcement learning? In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Montréal, QC, Canada, 13–17 May 2019; pp. 1395–1403. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, L.; Thompson, R.G. Understanding the benefits and limitations of occupancy information systems for couriers. Transp. Res. 2019, 105, 520–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shin, G.; Jarrahi, M.H.; Fei, Y.; Karami, A.; Gafinowitz, N.; Byun, A.; Lu, X. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2019, 93, 103153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, B.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, R. Optimization for courier delivery service network design based on frequency delay. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 106144.1–106144.19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McLeod, F.; Cherrett, T.; Bektas, T.; Allen, J.; Martinez-Sykora, A.; Lamas-Fernandez, C.; Bates, O.; Cheliotis, K.; Friday, A.; Piecyk, M.; et al. Quantifying environmental and financial benefits of using porters and cycle couriers for last-mile parcel delivery. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 82, 102311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rolf, S.; O’Reilly, J.; Meryon, M. Towards privatized social and employment protections in the platform economy? Evidence from the UK courier sector. Res. Policy 2022, 51, 104492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Oliveira, L.K.; de Oliveira, I.K.; de Oliveira Leite Nascimento, C.; de Oliveira Lobo Cordeiro, C.H.; Meira, L.H.; Rabay, L.; da Silva, F.G.F. Identification of factors to improve the productivity and working conditions of motorcycle couriers in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dos Santos, A.G.; Viana, A.; Pedroso, J.P. 2-echelon lastmile delivery with lockers and occasional couriers. Transp. Res. Part E 2022, 162, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bozanta, A.; Cevik, M.; Kavaklioglu, C.; Kavuk, E.M.; Tosun, A.; Sonuc, S.B.; Duranel, A.; Basar, A. Courier routing and assignment for food delivery service using reinforcement learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 164, 107871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ogbanufe, O.; Gerhart, N. Exploring smart wearables through the lens of reactance theory: Linking values, social influence, and status quo. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 127, 107044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huarng, K.-H.; Yu, T.H.-K.; Lee, C.F. Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 174, 121286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, N.; Xie, W.; Ali, A.; Brem, A.; Wang, S. How do individual characteristics and social capital shape users’ continuance intentions of smart wearable products? Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hayat, N.; Salameh, A.A.; Malik, H.A.; Yaacob, M.R. Exploring the adoption of wearable healthcare devices among the Pakistani adults with dual analysis techniques. Technol. Soc. 2022, 70, 102015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, N.; Misra, R.; Singh, S.; Rana, N.P.; Khorana, S. Assessing the factors that influence the adoption of healthcare wearables by the older population using an extended PMT model. Technol. Soc. 2022, 71, 102126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Acharjya, D.; Kiruba, B.G.C. A rough set, formal concept analysis and SEM-PLS integrated approach towards sustainable wearable computing in the adoption of smartwatch. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2022, 33, 100647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choi, Y.-W.; Lee, C.; Han, S. Predicting wearable IoT Adoption: Identifying core consumers through Machine learning algorithms. Telemat. Inform. 2024, 93, 102176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Q.; Al Mamun, A.; Reza, M.N.H.; Naznen, F. Modelling the significance of value-belief-norm framework to predict mass adoption potentials of internet of things-enabled wearable fitness devices. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lam, W.; Chen, Z. When I put on my service mask: Determinants and outcomes of emotional labor among hotel service providers according to affective event theory. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2012, 31, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guenter, H.; van Emmerik, I.H.; Schreurs, B. The negative effects of delays in information exchange: Looking at workplace relationships from an affective events perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2014, 24, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, M.M.; Chea, S. Cognitive appraisal of incident handling, affects, and post-adoption behaviors: A test of affective events theory. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 40, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarker, R.I.; Kaplan, S.; Mailer, M.; Timmermans, H.J. Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 130, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mi, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, T.; Yang, H.; Lv, T.; Shang, K.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, Z. How does COVID-19 emergency cognition influence public pro-environmental behavioral intentions? An affective event perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, B.; An, S.; Suh, J. How do tourists with disabilities respond to service failure? An application of affective events theory. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 38, 100806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mi, L.; Sun, Y.; Gan, X.; Yang, Y.; Jia, T.; Wang, B.; Xu, T. Predicting environmental citizenship behavior in the workplace: A new perspective of environmental affective event. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 2037–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, F. From willingness to action: Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 79, 102242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, Z.; Chen, L. An empirical study of brand microblog users’ unfollowing motivations: The perspective of push-pull-mooring model. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 102066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Mashraie, M.; Chung, S.H.; Jeon, H.W. Customer switching behavior analysis in the telecommunication industry via push-pull-mooring framework: A machine learning approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 144, 106476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, S.; Song, S.; Hansen, P.; Zhu, Q. Exploring askers’ switching from free to paid social Q&A services: A perspective on the push-pull-mooring framework. Inf. Process. Manag. 2021, 58, 102396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Y.; Oh, H.-K.; Lee, C.H. Understanding consumer switching intention of peer-to-peer accommodation: A push-pull-mooring framework. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 49, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Frasquet, M.; Miquel-Romero, M.-J. Competitive (versus loyal) showrooming: An application of the push-pull-mooring framework. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeng, Z.; Li, S.; Lian, J.-W.; Li, J.; Chen, T.; Li, Y. Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Land Use Policy 2021, 109, 105629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Wong, Y.D.; Liu, F.; Yuen, K.F. A push–pull–mooring view on technology-dependent shopping under social distancing: When technology needs meet health concerns. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 173, 121109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, K. Conceptualization and Examination of the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework in Predicting Fitness Consumer Switching Behavior. J. Glob. Sport Manag. 2021, 9, 39–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghufran, M.; Ali, S.; Ariyesti, F.R.; Nawaz, M.A.; Aldieri, L.; Xiaobao, P. Impact of COVID-19 to customers switching intention in the food segments: The push, pull and mooring effects in consumer migration towards organic food. Food Qual. Preference 2022, 99, 104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shapoval, V. Organizational injustice and emotional labor in the hospitality industry: A theoretical review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 83, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paydar, M.; Kamani-Fard, A.; Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. Perceived security of women in relation to their path choice toward sustainable neighborhood in Santiago, Chile. Cities 2017, 60, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guedes, M.; Santos, A.J.; Ribeiro, O.; Freitas, M.; Rubin, K.H.; Veríssimo, M. Perceived attachment security to parents and peer victimization: Does adolescent’s aggressive behaviour make a difference? J. Adolesc. 2018, 65, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahrous, A.M.; Moustafa, Y.M.; El-Ela, M.A.A. Physical characteristics and perceived security in urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2018, 9, 3055–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q.; Tran, A.T.P.; Van Nguyen, T.; Le, P.T.; Su, D.N. Investigating the complexity of perceived service quality and perceived safety and security in building loyalty among bus passengers in Vietnam—A PLS-SEM approach. Transp. Policy 2020, 101, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hanif, Y.; Lallie, H.S. Security factors on the intention to use mobile banking applications in the UK older generation (55+). A mixed-method study using modified UTAUT and MTAM—With perceived cyber security, risk, and trust. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, M.R.; Dhakal, S. Do experts and stakeholders perceive energy security issues differently in Bangladesh? Energy Strat. Rev. 2022, 42, 100887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Morosan, C.; DeFranco, A. It’s about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 53, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alalwan, A.A.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Rana, N.P.; Algharabat, R. Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 40, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Macedo, I.M. Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 75, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grob, M. Heterogeneity in consumers’ mobile shopping acceptance: A finite mixture partial least squares modelling approach for exploring and characterising different shopper segments. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oliveira, T.; Thomas, M.; Baptista, G.; Campos, F. Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 61, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hallak, R.; Assaker, G.; O’connor, P.; Lee, C. Firm performance in the upscale restaurant sector: The effects of resilience, creative self-efficacy, innovation and industry experience. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Doha, A.; Elnahla, N.; McShane, L. Social commerce as social networking. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 47, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gansser, O.A.; Reich, C.S. A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shaw, N.; Sergueeva, K. The non-monetary benefits of mobile commerce: Extending UTAUT2 with perceived value. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 45, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, W.; Dedahanov, A.T.; Shin, H.Y.; Kim, K.S. Switching intention to crypto-currency market: Factors predisposing some individuals to risky investment. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Khazaei, H.; Tareq, M.A. Moderating effects of personal innovativeness and driving experience on factors influencing adoption of BEVs in Malaysia: An integrated SEM–BSEM approach. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sun, W.; Dedahanov, A.T.; Shin, H.Y.; Li, W.P. Using extended complexity theory to test SMEs’ adoption of Blockchain-based loan system. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, B.; An, X.; Wang, C.; Shin, H.Y. Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, W.; Dedahanov, A.T.; Shin, H.Y.; Kim, K.S. Extending UTAUT Theory to Compare South Korean and Chinese Institutional Investors’ Investment Decision Behavior in Cambodia: A Risk and Asset Model. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In Advances in International Marketing; Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N., Eds.; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2009; pp. 277–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hair, J.R.; Black, W.C.; Babinand, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhou, R.; Tong, L. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Purchase Intention During Livestreaming e-Commerce: The Mediating Effect of Emotion. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 903023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, W.; Dedahanov, A.T.; Fayzullaev, A.K.U.; Abdurazzakov, O.S. Abusive supervision and employee voice: The roles of positive reappraisal and employee cynicism. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 927948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Melián-González, S. Gig economy delivery services versus professional service companies: Consumers’ perceptions of food-delivery services. Technol. Soc. 2022, 69, 101969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zenelabden, N.; Dikgang, J. Satisfaction with water services delivery in South Africa: The effects of social comparison. World Dev. 2022, 156, 105861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sun, W.; Shin, H.Y.; Wu, H.; Chang, X. Extending UTAUT2 with knowledge to test Chinese consumers’ adoption of imported spirits flash delivery applications. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hwang, J.; Kim, J.J.; Lee, K.-W. Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services: Its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 163, 120433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vakulenko, Y.; Arsenovic, J.; Hellström, D.; Shams, P. Does delivery service differentiation matter? Comparing rural to urban e-consumer satisfaction and retention. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 142, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Javed, M.K.; Wu, M. Effects of online retailer after delivery services on repurchase intention: An empirical analysis of customers’ past experience and future confidence with the retailer. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 101942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research model.
Figure 1. Research model.
Sustainability 16 08374 g001
Figure 2. Structural model results (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Structural model results (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 16 08374 g002
Table 1. Previous studies about wearable devices.
Table 1. Previous studies about wearable devices.
AuthorsResearch FactorsResearch Object
Ogbanufe and Gerhat (2022) [15]Value incongruence, social influence, freedom restrictionStatus quo behavior towards smartwatches
Huarng et al. (2022) [16]Economic, data privacy, ease of use, usefulnessHealthcare wearable device adoption
Wang et al. (2022) [17]Social capital, perceived values, individual characteristicsSmart wearable product adoption
Hayat et al. (2022) [18]Reliability, expectancy, health consciousness, price valueHealthcare wearables adoption in Pakistan
Singh et al. (2022) [19]Severity, novelty, accuracyHealthcare wearables adoption among elderly people
Acharja and Kiruba (2022) [20]Habit, attitude, advantageWearable computing in smartwatch adoption
Choi et al. (2024) [21]Five machine learning algorithmsInternet of Things wearable adoption
Yang et al. (2024) [22]Values, norms, beliefs, awarenessInternet of Things wearable adoption
Table 2. Demographic statistics.
Table 2. Demographic statistics.
CategorySubject N %
Gender Male19875.2%
Female6524.8%
Education levelHigh school9837.2%
Bachelor15860.0%
Master72.8%
Ph.D.00%
Age 20–3018168.8%
31–406825.8%
41–50145.4%
More than 5000%
Yearly income<USD 10,0006926.2%
USD 10,000–15,0008331.5%
USD 15,000–20,0009636.5%
>USD 20,000155.8%
Term of using wearable devices<3 months7829.6%
3–6 months12146.0%
6–12 moths5019.0%
>12 months145.4%
Table 3. Convergent validity, composite reliabilities testing results (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI Personal Innovativeness, PS perceived Security, U usage).
Table 3. Convergent validity, composite reliabilities testing results (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI Personal Innovativeness, PS perceived Security, U usage).
ConstructItemStandardized
Loading
AVEComposite
Reliability
Cronbach’s α
Affective event reactionAER10.9330.9610.9640.960
AER20.901
AER30.947
Perceived securityPS10.9540.9700.9320.923
PS20.968
PS30.912
Social influenceSI10.9420.9590.9190.945
SI20.927
SI30.927
Personal
innovativeness
PI10.8630.9630.9070.931
PI20.923
PI30.834
UsageU10.9140.9550.9260.958
U20.912
U30.947
Table 4. Discriminant validity (Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio) (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI personal innovativeness, PS perceived security, U usage).
Table 4. Discriminant validity (Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio) (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI personal innovativeness, PS perceived security, U usage).
AERPIPSSIUPI*AERPI*SIPI*PS
AER
PI0.062
PS0.4430.334
SI0.1090.1170.156
U0.4780.5600.2680.398
PI*AER0.0570.0180.0340.0810.077
PI*SI0.2590.2910.1360.0530.0140.042
PI*PS0.1460.3140.0880.0340.0390.0580.425
Table 5. Bootstrapping confidence interval up of HTMT (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI personal innovativeness, PS perceived security, U usage).
Table 5. Bootstrapping confidence interval up of HTMT (SI social influence, AER affective event reaction, PI personal innovativeness, PS perceived security, U usage).
2.5%97.5%
AER-U0.2170.395
PI-U0.5930.781
PS-U0.2050.389
SI-U0.1500.292
PI*AER-U0.0630.223
PI*PS-U0.0250.192
PI*SI-U0.1410.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, W.; Kim, J.; Su, H. Innovations of Express Companies: Adoption of Protective Wearable Artificial Intelligence Devices by Couriers. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198374

AMA Style

Sun W, Kim J, Su H. Innovations of Express Companies: Adoption of Protective Wearable Artificial Intelligence Devices by Couriers. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Wei, Junghoon Kim, and Huadong Su. 2024. "Innovations of Express Companies: Adoption of Protective Wearable Artificial Intelligence Devices by Couriers" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198374

APA Style

Sun, W., Kim, J., & Su, H. (2024). Innovations of Express Companies: Adoption of Protective Wearable Artificial Intelligence Devices by Couriers. Sustainability, 16(19), 8374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop