Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Spatial Distribution and Determinants of Key Rural Tourism Villages in China: Promoting Balanced Regional Development
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploratory Study of the Impact of the One-Village-One-Dam Initiative in Northern Ghana
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Functional and Aesthetic Factors for Well-Being in Age-Friendly Residential Areas (AFRA) in Poland: An International Comparative Perspective

by
Adam Senetra
,
Marta Czaplicka
*,
Małgorzata Dudzińska
and
Agnieszka Dawidowicz
Institute of Spatial Management and Geography, University of Warmia and Mazury, Prawochenskiego 15, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8571; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198571
Submission received: 27 August 2024 / Revised: 23 September 2024 / Accepted: 1 October 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)

Abstract

(1) Background: A precise and comprehensive diagnosis of the needs of older adults is the basis for developing concepts of aesthetic functional and spatial arrangements of public open spaces in residential areas that meet their expectations, termed “age-friendly residential areas” (AFRAs). The primary objective of the research was to determine the needs of older people concerning their preferences for the development of AFRAs. (2) Methods: This research was conducted on the basis of a survey conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, involving 1815 older citizens from Poland, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Lithuania, and Slovakia. The research aimed to determine the needs of older people regarding their preferences for the development of AFRA public open spaces. The developed research approach made it possible to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the needs of different generations of older adults, differentiated by gender and lifestyle, in terms of spatio-functional and landscape aspects with regard to the open spaces of residential estates? (2) Do older citizens from different countries living in various estates (single-family, multi-family) have the same expectations towards AFRAs? (3) Results: The research results showed a high convergence of preferences among older people regardless of gender, age group, or type of residential estate they live in (multi-family/single-family). Slight differences in AFRA preferences were noticed between Polish and non-Polish older adults, most often due to cultural habits. A correlation between the landscape attractiveness and aesthetics of the estate and the comfort of life for the older population, as well as their impact on the final assessment of the estate, was confirmed. As a result of the research, 33 spatio-functional and 16 landscape factors of AFRAs were identified and ranked.
Keywords: functionality; aesthetics; age-friendly residential areas functionality; aesthetics; age-friendly residential areas

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Senetra, A.; Czaplicka, M.; Dudzińska, M.; Dawidowicz, A. Functional and Aesthetic Factors for Well-Being in Age-Friendly Residential Areas (AFRA) in Poland: An International Comparative Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198571

AMA Style

Senetra A, Czaplicka M, Dudzińska M, Dawidowicz A. Functional and Aesthetic Factors for Well-Being in Age-Friendly Residential Areas (AFRA) in Poland: An International Comparative Perspective. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198571

Chicago/Turabian Style

Senetra, Adam, Marta Czaplicka, Małgorzata Dudzińska, and Agnieszka Dawidowicz. 2024. "Functional and Aesthetic Factors for Well-Being in Age-Friendly Residential Areas (AFRA) in Poland: An International Comparative Perspective" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198571

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop