Next Article in Journal
The Dynamics of Vegetation Evapotranspiration and Its Response to Surface Meteorological Factors in the Altay Mountains, Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Moving beyond the Framing Impasse in the Aral Sea Delta: Vernacular Knowledge of Salinization and Its Potential for Social Learning towards Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System

1
School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8607; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198607
Submission received: 21 August 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 2 October 2024 / Published: 3 October 2024

Abstract

Resources and environment are essential elements of social and economic development. Whether the current resources and environment can sufficiently support economic and social development is an important scientific issue. Existing studies have not reached a consensus on the definition, assessment, and forewarning methods of resource and environmental carrying capacity (RECC). Therefore, this study puts forward a ternary theoretical system of RECC from the perspective of pressure, support, and adjustment, constructs a novel evaluation indices system of RECC, introduces a ternary evaluation model, and proposes a hierarchical forewarning method of RECC with a threshold of 1. Furthermore, an empirical demonstration of 31 provinces in China is presented. The results show that: (1) the average RECC index of 31 areas revealed a downward trend from 2012 to 2021, indicating the gradually improving RECC; (2) the RECC indices of central areas were always high, which manifests the poor RECC; (3) the number of provinces with RECC at Alert Level III decreased from 18 to 7, and the number of provinces at Non-Alert Level increased from 6 to 8.
Keywords: resource and environmental carrying capacity; evaluation; pressure; support; adjustment resource and environmental carrying capacity; evaluation; pressure; support; adjustment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Y.; Tan, X.; Zhu, Z.; Liao, J.; Xiang, L.; Wu, F. Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198607

AMA Style

Peng Y, Tan X, Zhu Z, Liao J, Xiang L, Wu F. Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Ying, Xingyu Tan, Zhanglin Zhu, Jiayun Liao, Luojing Xiang, and Feng Wu. 2024. "Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop