Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Modernization of Wastewater Treatment Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Leveraging Green HRM to Foster Organizational Agility and Green Culture: Pathways to Enhanced Sustainable Social and Environmental Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework

by
Carlos Robles-Algarín
1,*,
Luis Castrillo-Fernández
1 and
Diego Restrepo-Leal
2,*
1
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia
2
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 470002, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8761; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208761
Submission received: 25 August 2024 / Revised: 2 October 2024 / Accepted: 4 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

This research paper proposes a framework utilizing multicriteria tools for optimal site selection of photovoltaic solar farms. A comparative analysis was conducted using three quantitative methods—CRITIC (criteria importance through intercriteria correlation), PCA (principal component analysis), and entropy—to obtain the weights for the selection process. The evaluation considered environmental, demographic, financial, meteorological, and performance system criteria. TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) was employed to rank the alternatives based on their proximity to the ideal positive solution and distance from the ideal negative solution. The capital cities of the seven departments in the Colombian Caribbean region were selected for the assessment, characterized by high annual solar radiation, to evaluate the suitability of the proposed decision-making framework. The results demonstrated that Barranquilla consistently ranked in the top two across all methods, indicating its strong performance. Cartagena, for instance, fluctuated between first and third place, showing some stability but still influenced by the method used. In contrast, Sincelejo consistently ranked among the lowest positions. A sensitivity analysis with equal weight distribution confirmed the top-performing cities, though it also highlighted that the weight assignment method impacted the final rankings. Choosing the appropriate method for weight calculation depended on factors such as the diversity and interdependence of criteria, the availability of reliable data, and the desired sensitivity of the results. For instance, CRITIC captured inter-criteria correlation, while PCA focused on reducing dimensionality, and entropy emphasized the variability of information.
Keywords: multicriteria decision analysis; CRITIC; PCA; entropy; TOPSIS; photovoltaic solar farms; sustainable cities; optimal site selection multicriteria decision analysis; CRITIC; PCA; entropy; TOPSIS; photovoltaic solar farms; sustainable cities; optimal site selection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Robles-Algarín, C.; Castrillo-Fernández, L.; Restrepo-Leal, D. Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208761

AMA Style

Robles-Algarín C, Castrillo-Fernández L, Restrepo-Leal D. Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework. Sustainability. 2024; 16(20):8761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Robles-Algarín, Carlos, Luis Castrillo-Fernández, and Diego Restrepo-Leal. 2024. "Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework" Sustainability 16, no. 20: 8761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop