Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- What is the state-of-the-art literature highlighting the research trends on SE strategies?
- (2)
- What contemporary strategies are utilised to enhance SE practices, specifically focusing on elucidating the most appropriate categorisation of these strategies for targeted interventions in the future?
- (3)
- What are the future research opportunities according to theoretical and methodological aspects based on the in-depth analysis of strategies of SE practices?
2. Research Methods
2.1. Question Formulation
2.2. Locating Studies
2.3. Study Selection and Evaluation
2.4. Analysis and Synthesis
2.5. Reporting the Results
3. Results and Discussion of Descriptive Analysis
3.1. Distribution of Articles Based on the Year
3.2. Distribution of Articles Based on Publication Source
3.3. Distribution of Articles Based on Data Collection and Analysis Methods
3.4. Distribution of Articles Based on Industries
3.5. Cross-Analysis of Articles Based on Strategies and Industries
4. Results and Discussion of Thematic Analysis
4.1. Approach to Coding Articles
4.2. Cycles of Coding
4.3. Results and Discussion of Thematic Analysis
- Economy-related strategies
- Environment-related strategies
- Geography-related strategies
- Governance-related strategies
- Health-, safety-, and security-related strategies
- Marketing-related strategies
- People-related strategies
- Product/service-related strategies
- Research-, training-, and education-related strategies
- Technology-related strategies
5. Limitations and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Holden, N.M. A readiness level framework for sustainable circular bioeconomy. EFB Bioecon. J. 2022, 2, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acquier, A.; Daudigeos, T.; Pinkse, J. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 125, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Netter, S.; Gjerdrum Pedersen, E.R.; Lüdeke-Freund, F. Sharing economy revisited: Towards a new framework for understanding sharing models. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 221, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parente, R.C.; Geleilate, J.M.G.; Rong, K. The sharing economy globalization phenomenon: A research agenda. J. Int. Manag. 2018, 24, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altrock, S.; Suh, A. Sharing economy versus access economy: A critical reflection on social interaction between peers. In HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Supporting Business: 4th International Conference, HCIBGO 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part II; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Chuah, S.H.W.; Tseng, M.L.; Wu, K.J.; Cheng, C.F. Factors influencing the adoption of sharing economy in B2B context in China: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 175, 105892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M. Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 87, 102470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rayport, J.F.; Jaworski, B.J. Cases in E-Commerce; McGraw-Hill Higher Education: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gebeyehu, S.; Twinomurinzi, H. Evaluating the optimization of limited government resources in low-income countries using a sharing economy platform. S. Afr. Comput. J. 2022, 34, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathnayake, I.; Paniagua, J.O.; Gu, N.; Rameezdeen, R.; Statsenko, L.; Sandhu, S. A critical review of the key aspects of sharing economy: A systematic literature review and research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 434, 140378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckhardt, G.M.; Houston, M.B.; Jiang, B.; Lamberton, C.; Rindfleisch, A.; Zervas, G. Marketing in the sharing economy. J. Mark. 2019, 83, 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerwe, O.; Silva, R. Clarifying the sharing economy: Conceptualization, typology, antecedents, and effects. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 65–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehto, X.; Luo, W.; Miao, L.; Ghiselli, R.F. Shared tourism experience of individuals with disabilities and their caregivers. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2018, 8, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benoit, S.; Wang, Y.; Teng, L.; Hampson, D.P.; Li, X. Innovation in the sharing economy: A framework and future research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 149, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, J.; So, K.K.F.; Mody, M.A.; Liu, S.Q.; Chun, H.H. Platforms in the peer-topeer sharing economy. J. Serv. Manag. 2019, 30, 452–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaefers, T.; Wittkowski, K.; Benoit, S.; Ferraro, R. Contagious effects of customer misbehaviour in access-based services. J. Serv. Res. 2016, 19, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palatova, P.; Rinn, R.; Machoň, M.; Paluš, H.; Purwestri, R.C.; Jarský, V. Sharing economy in the forestry sector: Opportunities and barriers. For. Policy. Econ. 2023, 154, 103000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Gu, H.; Li, Y.; Ye, W. A systematic review of trust in sharing accommodation: Progress and prospects from the multistakeholder perspective. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 1156–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcantara Guimaraes, J.G.; Rosa Franco, V.; Castro-Lucas de Souza, C. Sharing economy: A review of the recent literature. Rev. Eur. D’´Econ. Manag. Des. Serv. 2018, 6, 77–96. [Google Scholar]
- Kauffman, R.J.; Naldi, M. Research directions for sharing economy issues. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 43, 100973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Yan, L.; Ruan, F.; Zeng, X. An abductive analysis of debates on the impact of the sharing economy: A systematic review in a sustainable framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods; Buchanan, A.D., Bryman, A., Eds.; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2009; pp. 671–689. [Google Scholar]
- Cantzler, J.; Creutzig, F.; Ayargarnchanakul, E.; Javaid, A.; Wong, L.; Haas, W. Saving resources and the climate? A systematic review of the circular economy and its mitigation potential. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belezas, F.; Daniel, A.D. Innovation in the sharing economy: A systematic literature review and research framework. Technovation 2023, 122, 102509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Mahfouz, A.; Arisha, A. Analysing supply chain resilience: Integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2017, 22, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaya, I.; Alaloul, W.S.; Musarat, M.A. Role of inflation in construction: A systematic review. In ICCOEE2020: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE2020); Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 701–708. [Google Scholar]
- Khallaf, R.; Khallaf, M. Classification and analysis of deep learning applications in construction: A systematic literature review. Autom. ConStruct. 2021, 129, 103760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scipioni, S.; Dini, G.; Niccolini, F. Exploring circular shipbuilding: A systematic review on circular economy business models and supporting technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 138470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, S.; Breier, M.; Lim, W.; Dabic, M.; Kumar, S.; Kanbach, D.; Mukherjee, D.; Corvello, V.; Pĩneiro-Chousa, J.; Liguori, E.; et al. Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 16, 2577–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clarke, V.; Braun, V. Thematic analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. 2017, 12, 297–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatima, T.; Elbanna, S. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. J. Bus. Ethics 2023, 183, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, C.; Hashmi, H.B.A.; Xiao, Z.; Haider, S.W.; Nasir, M. How do Islamic values influence CSR? A systematic literature review of studies from 1995–2020. J. Bus. Ethics 2021, 181, 471–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osei-Kyei, R.; Narbaev, T.; Xiaohua, J.; Komac, U.; Akomea-Frimpong, I.; Castelblanco, G. Critical review analysis of the drivers and barriers for adopting net zero carbon procurement. Sustain. Futures 2024, 8, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferjanić Hodak, D.; Krajinović, V. Examining recent research in the field of sharing economy in tourism: Bibliometric and content analysis. Tour. Int. Interdiscipl. J. 2020, 68, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mody, M.A.; Hanks, L.; Cheng, M. Sharing economy research in hospitality and tourism: A critical review using bibliometric analysis, content analysis and a quantitative systematic literature review. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 1711–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X. Multidimensional study of hospitality and the host-guest paradigm in China. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knudson, D.; Cardinal, B.J.; McCullagh, P. Synthesis of publication metrics in kinesiology-related journals: Proxies for rigor, usage, and prestige. Quest 2024, 76, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Pérez, M.; Terán-Yépez, E.; Marín-Carrillo, M.B.; Rueda-López, N. 40 years of sharing economy research: An intellectual and cognitive structures analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 94, 102856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Qu, H.; Wang, X. Impact of green marketing on peer-to-peer accommodation platform users’ repurchase intention and positive word-of-mouth: Mediation of trust and consumer identification. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 691–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Chen, X.; Liu, N. Unlocking Sustainable Urban Mobility: Understanding the Impact of Motivational Factors on Dockless Bike-Sharing Adoption Within the Knowledge-Based Economy. J. Knowl. Econ. 2024, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuhroh, D.; Jermias, J.; Ratnasari, S.L.; Sriyono, S.; Nurjanah, E.; Fahlevi, M. The role of GoJek and Grab sharing economy platforms and management accounting systems usage on performance of MSMEs during COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2024, 12, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieco, C.; Palagonia, C. Delving into the behaviour of sharing economy consumers: A literature review. J. Consum. Mark. 2024, 41, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, G.A. There’s an Uber for everything now. Wall Str. J. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Soundararajan, K.; Ho, H.K.; Su, B. Sankey diagram framework for energy and exergy flows. Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esteves, J.R.; Cardoso, J.C.; Gonçalves, B.S. Design recommendations for immersive virtual reality application for English learning: A systematic review. Computers 2023, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.L.; Chien, T.W.; Wang, J.C. Using Sankey diagrams to explore the trend of article citations in the field of bladder cancer: Research achievements in China higher than those in the United States. Medicine 2022, 101, e30217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, S.C.; Lee, A.V.Y.; Lee, M. A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for collaborative learning over the past two decades. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2022, 3, 100097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakravorty, I.; Daga, S.; Chakravorty, S.; Bamrah, J.S.; Mehta, R. Protocol for thematic synthesis of differential attainment in the medical profession—Bridging the gap series. Sushruta J. Health Policy Opin. 2020, 13, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linneberg, M.S.; Korsgaard, S. Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qual. Res. J. 2019, 19, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldana, J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. In The coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2021; 440p. [Google Scholar]
- El Alaoui Amine, M.; Ouhna, L. Islamic Value and Organizational Ethics: A Systematic Literature Review. In Global Islamic Marketing Conference; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 325–346. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, D.R. A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. Am. J. Eval. 2006, 27, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelo, O.; Braakmann, D.; Benetka, G. Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2008, 42, 266–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, M.; Moser, T. The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. Int. Manag. Rev. 2019, 15, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
- Daftary, A.M.H. Living with Uncertainty: Perceptions of Well-being Among Latinx Young Adults in Immigrant Family Systems. Fam. Relat. 2020, 69, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naumov, S.; Keith, D. Optimizing the economic and environmental benefits of ride-hailing and pooling. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2023, 32, 904–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.; Raghupathi, V.; Raghupathi, W. Exploring Influential Factors in Hiring Freelancers in Online Labor Platforms: An Empirical Study. Economies 2023, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Devi, K.; Naidu, S.; Greig, T.; Singh, G.; Slack, N. From brick and mortar to click and order: Consumers’ online food delivery service perceptions post-pandemic. Br. Food. J. 2023, 125, 4143–4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sthapit, E.; Bjork, P. Sources of negative memorable experiences: Finnish Airbnb guest perspectives. Consum. Behav. Tour. Hosp. 2022, 17, 382–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Kim, D. Why did Uber China fail? Lessons from business model analysis. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Tang, L.; Kim, E.; Wang, X. Hierarchal formation of trust on peer-to-peer lodging platforms. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2022, 46, 1384–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Mahajan, H.; Dogra, R. It’s Not Just About Money in Peer-To-Peer Accommodation: Examining Residents’ Intentions Using Motivation-Opportunity-Ability Theory. Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2022, 70, 585–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont, O.; Curtis, S.K.; Palgan, Y.V. Organisational response strategies to COVID-19 in the sharing economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uber Helping MOVE What Matters Uber 2020. Available online: https://www.uber.com/se/en/coronavirus/ (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- Lee, J.; Erdogan, A.N.; Hong, I.B. Participation in the sharing economy revisited: The role of culture and social influence on Airbnb. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, K.; Sun, H.; Li, D.; Zhou, D. Matching as service provision of sharing economy platforms: An information processing perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 171, 120901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Shankar, K.M.; Kannan, D. Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 227, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Lai, K.H.; Wu, J.; Duan, W. Listening to online reviews: A mixed-methods investigation of customer experience in the sharing economy. Decis. Support. Syst. 2021, 149, 113609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Hu, Y.; Qiao, H.; Wang, S.; Jiang, F. Conflicts between business and government in bike sharing system. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2020, 31, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, F.; Gu, F.; Zhang, W.; Guo, J. Is bicycle sharing an environmental practice? Evidence from a life cycle assessment based on behavioral surveys. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pconline. Experience Mobby-Lite: Low Cost and Comfortable. 2018. Available online: http://www.pconline.com.cn/autotech/852/8520760.html (accessed on 30 December 2023).
- Mao, G.; Hou, T.; Liu, X.; Zuo, J.; Kiyawa, A.H.I.; Shi, P.; Sandhu, S. How can bicycle-sharing have a sustainable future? A research based on life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 125081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, A. Understanding the shared working spaces: A Geography of Co-working supply in Delhi. GeoJournal 2023, 88, 3439–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariotti, I.; Pacchi, C.; Di Vita, S. Co-working spaces in milan: Location patterns and urban effects. J. Urban. Technol. 2017, 24, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y. Coworking as an emerging Urban lifestyle: Location analysis of coworking spaces in Manhattan, NYC. In Proceedings of the 50th Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA) Conference, New York, NY, USA, 22–26 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Coll-Martínez, E.; Méndez-Ortega, C. Agglomeration and coagglomeration of co-working spaces and creative industries in the city. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020, 31, 445–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Fu, R.J. Accommodation experience in the sharing economy: A comparative study of Airbnb online reviews. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, M.; Jin, X. What do Airbnb users care about? An analysis of online review comments. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 76, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Tang, R. Understanding hidden dimensions in textual reviews on Airbnb: An application of modified latent aspect rating analysis (LARA). Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 80, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Tao, Y.; Chen, W. Prospects and barriers analysis framework for the development of energy storage sharing. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 89, 104368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratilla, M.; Dey, S.K.; Chovancova, M. Attitude Towards Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Evidence from Tourists in the Philippines. Tourism Int. Interdiscip. J. 2023, 71, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sthapit, E.; Björk, P.; Jiménez Barreto, J. Negative memorable experience: North American and British Airbnb guests’ perspectives. Tour. Rev. 2021, 76, 639–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Choo, W.C.; Ng, K.Y.; Ng, S.I.; Song, P. Exploring sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Airbnb accommodation using unsupervised and supervised topic modeling. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 659481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michelini, L.; Grieco, C.; Ciulli, F.; Di Leo, A. Uncovering the impact of food sharing platform business models: A theory of change approach. Br. Food. J. 2020, 122, 1437–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, T.; Kim, I.; Currie, G. To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 119, 122–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, R.; Chen, H. Do efforts to address safety pay off? Evidence from the sharing economy in the post–pandemic world. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 1238–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Huang, J.; Huang, S.; Huang, D. Perceived barriers and negotiation of using peer-to-peer accommodation by Chinese consumers in the COVID-19 context. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Mang. 2023, 35, 1264–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, A.; Sindhwani, R.; Dwivedi, A.; Saddikuti, V. Sustainable recovery for digital entrepreneurs with shared resources: Enablers, challenges and solutions. J. Asia Bus. Stud. 2022, 16, 515–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albastroiu Nastase, I.; Negrutiu, C.; Felea, M.; Acatrinei, C.; Cepoi, A.; Istrate, A. Toward a circular economy in the toy industry: The business model of a Romanian company. Sustainability 2021, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Lee, K. Influence of the Characteristics of Sports Sharing Economy Services on Intention of Use: The Mediating Effect of Consumer Attitude and Trust. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis SK Business model patterns in the sharing economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1650–1671. [CrossRef]
- Haddad, A. Practicing Safe Car Sharing While Navigating COVID-19. Field Notes Turo Blog. 8 June 2020. Available online: https://turo.com/blog/news/practicing-safe-car-sharing-while-navigating-COVID-19 (accessed on 15 December 2023).
- SnappCar. Carsharing During the Coronavirus. SnappCar Blog. 18 March 2020. Available online: https://blog.snappcar.nl/2020/03/18/maatregelen-snappcar-coronavirus/ (accessed on 17 December 2023).
- Yan, Y.; Lu, B.; Xu, T. Exploring the Relationship between Host Self-Description and Consumer Purchase Behavior Using a Self-Presentation Strategy. Systems 2023, 11, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhadi, A.; Kamble, S.; Benkhati, I.; Gupta, S.; Mangla, S.K. Does strategic management of digital technologies influence electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and customer loyalty? Empirical insights from B2B platform economy. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 156, 113548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mas-Machuca, M.; Marimon, F.; Jaca, C. The unexplored potential of trust to boost customer loyalty for transport platforms. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 41, 100618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Mishra, S. Luxury fashion consumption in sharing economy: A study of Indian millennials. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2020, 11, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S. Exploring relationship between value perception and luxury purchase intention: A case of Indian millennials. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2019, 23, 414–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, S.; Pooripakdee, S.; Schreier, C. Understanding Managerial Action in Business Model Transformation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. ABAC J. 2023, 43, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, S.; Pooripakdee, S. The shift from owning to sharing: Employing action research to facilitate SMEs’ business model transformation. Int. J. Action Res. 2022, 18, 204–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, F.; Lehmann, J.; Graf-Vlachy, L.; König, A. Institution-infused sensemaking of discontinuous innovations: The case of the sharing economy. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2019, 36, 632–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bresciani, S.; Ferraris, A.; Santoro, G.; Viglia, G. The seven lives of Airbnb. The role of of accommodation types. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 88, 103170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Z. Can bike-sharing availability improve tourist satisfaction? Evidence in Chicago. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 48, 101164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, S.; Watchravesringkan, K.; Swamy, U.; Lang, C. Investigating Expectancy Values in Online Apparel Rental during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moderating Effects of Fashion Leadership. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerberg, C.; Martinez, L.F. Young German consumers’ perspectives of rental fashion platforms. Young Consum. 2023, 24, 309–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transp. Rev. 2003, 49, 1407–1424. [Google Scholar]
- Park, Y.C.; Hong, P. Knowledge Sharing Practices for Corporate Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of Sharing Economy Firms in Japan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LoveHomeSwap. 11 Useful Phrases When Travelling Abroad Post Coron-Avirus (COVID-19) [WWW Document]. Love Home Swap. 2020. Available online: https://www.lovehomeswap.com/blog/latest-news/phrases-you-might-need-when-travelling-abroad-post-coronavirus-COVID-19 (accessed on 30 December 2023).
- Gu, H.; Zhang, T.; Lu, C.; Song, X. Assessing trust and risk perceptions in the sharing economy: An empirical study. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 58, 1002–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimura, R.; Nakajima, T. A design approach for building a digital platform to augment human abilities based on a more-than-human perspective. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 35497–35552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherriff, G.; Adams, M.; Blazejewski, L.; Davies, N.; Kamerāde, D. From Mobike to no bike in greater Manchester: Using the capabilities approach to explore Europe’s first wave of dockless bike share. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 86, 102744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Cui, R.; Cheng, M.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z. A comparison of key attributes between peer-to-peer accommodations and hotels using online reviews. Curr. Issue Tour. 2020, 23, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmaki, A.; Miguel, C.; Drotarova, M.H.; Aleksić, A.; Časni, A.Č.; Efthymiadou, F. Impacts of COVID-19 on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms: Host perceptions and responses. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ke, J.; Yang, H.; Zheng, Z. On ride-pooling and traffic congestion. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2020, 142, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A. Shared ride services in North America. Transp. Rev. 2019, 39, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Alejandro, T.B. Equilibrium blockchain adoption strategies for duopolistic competitive platforms with network effects. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 164, 113953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Valencia, A.; Paris, D.; Cala, J. Mobile internet applications: Implications for taxi driver behavior and operations. Transp. Plan. Technol. 2020, 43, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inclusion Criteria | Rationale |
---|---|
Published in peer-reviewed journals. | Publications in peer-reviewed journals are considered high quality, valid, and original. |
Published in the English language. | English is a global language, the most dominant language in SE research, and the most familiar language to the authors of this research. |
Published from 2014 to 2023. | To conduct SLRs, the search period can be selected based on a ‘specific period’ [29], and SE research is prominent around this period. |
Publications based on empirical data. | Studies solely based on a literature review were excluded to avoid duplications of the data analysed. |
Publications mainly based on the strategies of SE practices. | By considering the research gap identified and the research focus of this study. |
Journal | No. of Papers | Quartile Based on SJR | Quartile Based on Clarivate |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainability | 6 | Q1 | Q2 |
British Food Journal | 2 | Q1 | Q2 |
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management | 2 | Q1 | Q1 |
Journal of Business Research | 2 | Q1 | Q1 |
Tourism | 2 | Q3 | Q3 |
ABAC Journal | 1 | Q1 | N/A |
Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality | 1 | Q1 | N/A |
Decision Support Systems | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Forest Policy and Economics | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Economies | 1 | Q2 | Q2 |
Geo Journal | 1 | Q2 | Q1 |
Frontiers in Psychology | 1 | Q2 | Q1 |
International Journal of Conflict Management | 1 | Q1 | Q2 |
Journal of Asia Business Studies | 1 | Q1 | Q2 |
International Journal of Production Economics | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Journal of China Tourism Research | 1 | Q1 | Q3 |
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Journal of Global Fashion Marketing | 1 | Q1 | Q2 |
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity | 1 | Q1 | N/A |
Journal of Management Studies | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Multimedia Tools and Applications | 1 | Q1 | Q2 |
Production and Operations Management | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Social Sciences | 1 | Q2 | N/A |
Research in Transportation Business and Management | 1 | Q1 | Q2 |
Sustainable Cities and Society | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Systems | 1 | Q2 | Q1 |
Sustainable Production and Consumption | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Young Consumers | 1 | Q1 | Q3 |
Tourism Management Perspectives | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Tourism Review | 1 | Q1 | Q1 |
Summary | Total papers—40 | Q1—81% Q2—13% Q3—3% | Q1—52% Q2—26% Q3—10% N/A—13% |
Data Analysis Method | No. of Papers |
---|---|
Single method of analysis | 23 |
Structural equation modeling | 5 |
Content analysis | 3 |
Regression analysis | 2 |
Confirmatory factor analysis | 2 |
Cross-case analysis | 1 |
Time-varying difference-in-differences (DiD) model | 1 |
Business model analysis | 1 |
Fuzzy analytical hierarchical process | 1 |
Correlation analysis | 1 |
Business model analysis | 1 |
SWOT analysis | 1 |
Text mining techniques | 1 |
System dynamics (SD) approach | 1 |
The grounded theory | 1 |
Website content analysis | 1 |
Multi-methods of analysis | 17 |
Experience prototyping and annotated portfolio analysis | 1 |
Content analysis and frequency analysis | 1 |
Descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, PROCESS v4.0 macro Model 1 and Model 4 | 1 |
Propensity score matching technique, sensitivity analyses | 1 |
Ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression | 1 |
Discrete choice experiment and a multinomial logit choice model, sensitivity analyses | 1 |
Structural equation modeling, moderation analysis | 1 |
Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), interpretative structural modeling (ISM), and Matrix impacts cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC) | 1 |
Game theory models and equilibrium analysis | 1 |
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling | 1 |
Exploratory factor analysis, structural equating modelling, | 1 |
Systematic literature review, web analysis | 1 |
Supervised latent dirichlet analysis, latent dirichlet allocation analysis, topic distribution analysis | 1 |
equilibrium analysis, game theory, information processing and decision-making models | 1 |
Text mining and econometric methods | 1 |
Best worst method (BWM), Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) | 1 |
Life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, sensitivity analysis | 1 |
The First Cycle of Coding | The Second Cycle of Coding |
---|---|
Cost-splitting, investments, affordable prices, fair pricing strategies, rates, special offers, discounts, referral credits, financial assistance, refunds, cancellation fees, monetary rewards, security deposits, and payment methods. | Economy-related strategies |
Responsibility for recycling shared bicycles, environmentally friendly materials, carbon dioxide, scrapping and recycling stages, environmental impacts, environmental burdens, changes in material and weight reduces. | Environment-related strategies |
Popular and developed areas, amenities, strategic position, extended business locations, and service coverage. | Geography-related strategies |
Contracts, cancellation and return policies, industry-specific legal framework, international, national, and local best practices and guidelines, household rules, periodically review policies, actions against non-compliance, or dishonest hosts, operation and maintenance standards, legislative measures, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), complaint handling, and compensation procedure. | Governance-related strategies |
Personal supplies, disinfection, deep cleaning, own safety, professional cleaning services, health and safety guidelines, disposable supplies, antibacterial materials, CCTV camera, COVID, and health and safety measures. | Health-, safety-, and security-related strategies |
Cross-promotions, reviews, advertising, rating system, invite celebrities/influences, social media, and marketing mix. | Marketing-related strategies |
Willingness, co-operation, rapport, partnership, collaboration, provide quick responses. | People-related strategies |
Contact methods, range of products, exclusive brands, unique and rare items, the option to buy the product at the end of a certain period, easy access/check-in, simple and convenient sharing process, 24/7 roadside assistance. | Product/service-related strategies |
Information, procedures, accurate, and up-to-date information, education and training sessions, guidance and assistance, incubation centres, instructions, new market trends, experiments, research, maps, and product innovations. | Research, training & education-related strategies |
Platforms, timely delivery updates, live chat, two-way feedback system, language selection option, blockchain, travel prediction algorithm, Secure Sockets Layer, GPS technologies and maps, digital infrastructure, and mobile app. | Technology-related strategies |
Category | No. | Strategy | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|---|
Economy-related strategies (A) | A1 | Offer affordable prices compared to traditional service providers in the exact location. | RP |
A2 | Cost-splitting by engaging others | RC | |
A3 | Increase investments in technological improvements and R&D | PF, RP | |
A4 | Follow the fair pricing strategies when setting up the rates | PF | |
A5 | Offering special offers, discounts, and referral credits to attract customers | RP | |
A6 | Provide financial assistance | G | |
A7 | Enable cancellations with refunds if advertised cleanliness or features are not met. | PF | |
A8 | Waive cancellation and late fees due to the pandemic or health crisis | PF | |
A9 | Provide monetary rewards to encourage resource providers to take more orders/bookings. | PF | |
A10 | Take a security deposit from the customer | PF, RP | |
A11 | Integrate various user-friendly payment methods (digital wallet, credit cards, instalments) | PF | |
Environment-related strategies | B1 | Take responsibility for recycling shared bicycles | RP |
B2 | Use environmentally friendly and durable materials as much as possible | RP | |
Geographic-related strategies | C1 | Select popular and developed areas to conduct the business | PF |
C2 | Strategically position coworking spaces near diverse amenities (bars, gyms, and metro train stations) to enhance accessibility and convenience. | PF, RP | |
C3 | Gradually extend the business to various locations while improving the service coverage. | PF | |
Governance-related strategies | D1 | Implement flexible and user-friendly contracts, cancellations and return policies | PF |
D2 | Implement industry-specific and well-regulated legal framework | G | |
D3 | Define resource providers’ and consumers’ responsibilities | PF | |
D4 | Follow international, national, and local best practices and guidelines | PF, RP | |
D5 | Communicate all household rules | RP | |
D6 | Periodically review policies and find the balance between consumer and provider where both parties perceive the policies as fair. | PF | |
D7 | Take strict actions against non-compliance or dishonest hosts when reporting inconsistencies | G, PF | |
D8 | Enhance the level of operation and maintenance standards | PF | |
D9 | Implement legislative measures for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) to promote sustainable sharing | G | |
D10 | Improve complaint handling and compensation procedure | PF | |
Health-, safety-, and security-related strategies | E1 | Disinfect and deep clean resources between users | RP |
E2 | Bring your supplies (toothbrush, towel, cup, etc.) | RC | |
E3 | Take actions for your safety (bring door stoppers, check for needle cameras and set a few alarm clocks) | RC | |
E4 | Select accommodation from more developed or avoid isolated areas | RC | |
E5 | Select a resource provider who has a lot of listed resources | RC | |
E6 | Try to involve others (family or friends) when staying alone in an accommodation. | RC | |
E7 | Get the service from professional cleaning services | PF, RP | |
E8 | Communicate all health and safety guidelines | PF, RP | |
E9 | Provide disposable supplies | RP | |
E10 | Use or try to incorporate antibacterial materials for a shared resource | PF, RP | |
E11 | Installing CCTV cameras | RP | |
E12 | Implementing health and safety measures in COVID situations, such as limiting the number of people, increasing opening hours, self-checking, avoiding physical contact, etc. | PF | |
Marketing-related strategies | F1 | Offer cross-promotions | PF, RP |
F2 | Write honest reviews with actual images | RC | |
F3 | Highlight unique and advanced features when advertising | PF, RP | |
F4 | Improve the content or features of the shared resource | PF, RP | |
F5 | Launch a two-way rating/feedback system | PF | |
F6 | Invite celebrities/influencers with trustworthy reputations to support the business. | PF, RP | |
F7 | Use social media for advertising | PF, RP | |
F8 | Apply the right marketing mix considering socio-demographic characteristics. | PF, RP | |
People-related strategies | G1 | Enhance willingness and interest to incorporate SE practices by providing incentives (awards, prizes, certificates, logo distinction/super-host badges) | PF |
G2 | Establish a good rapport with other parties | PF, RP, RC | |
G3 | Establish good partnerships and collaborations with other individuals and companies to leverage resources, expertise, cross-promotions, and networks for mutual benefits | PF, RP | |
G4 | Provide accurate and updated information and procedures about the business/parties, platform, and sharing resources and provide quick responses to queries | PF, RP, RC | |
Product/service-related strategies | H1 | Provide diverse contact methods (telephonic communication, emails and their website, audio/video, subtitles). | PF, RP |
H2 | Offer a wide range of products/services and exclusive brands with better prices. | PF | |
H3 | Offer unique and rare items | PF, RP | |
H4 | Provide the option to buy the product at the end of a certain period after fulfilling relevant requirements. | PF | |
H5 | Provide easy access/check-in and a simple and convenient sharing process | PF, RP | |
H6 | Provide an option to select a preferred service provider based on various criteria. | PF | |
H7 | Offer 24/7 roadside assistance and emergency support | PF | |
Research-, training-, and education-related strategies | I1 | Clearly communicate the required information and procedures about the shared resource. | PF, RP |
I2 | Provide accurate and up-to-date information about the business/provider, including operating hours, pricing, menu/catalogue, reviews, and ratings | PF, RP | |
I3 | Seek all required information from the resource provider | RC | |
I4 | Conduct education and training sessions | PF | |
I5 | Offer guidance and assistance | PF | |
I6 | Establish incubation centres | G | |
I7 | Mention instructions in the multiple languages | PF, RP | |
I8 | Use plain language when communicating without having too many technical terms | PF, RP | |
I9 | Actively involve residents in the decision-making process related to destination and local environment | G, PF, RP | |
I10 | Implement Partake-in-Our-Cause (PIOC) communication strategy | PF, RP | |
I11 | Explore new market trends and modify the business process accordingly | PF, RP | |
I12 | Conduct experiments and research when selecting a product/service to be shared | PF, RP | |
I13 | Conduct research on people’s behaviour needs | PF, RP | |
I14 | Map out resting/parking areas and their storage capacities | PF | |
I15 | Conduct product innovations to improve the quality | PF, RP | |
Technology-related strategies | J1 | Maintain a feature-rich and user-friendly platform | PF |
J2 | Provide timely and accurate delivery updates | PF | |
J3 | Setting up live chat functions and 24/7 hotline service in multiple languages to facilitate immediate communication | PF | |
J4 | Develop an advanced travel prediction algorithm to allocate resources and matchmaking. | PF | |
J5 | Allow language selection option | PF | |
J6 | Integrate blockchain and Secure Sockets Layer technologies to enhance the security and reliability of the platform. | PF | |
J7 | Provide a clear visual comparison related to other similar resources | PF | |
J8 | Develop a communication mechanism for reporting emergencies | PF | |
J9 | Integrate high-end GPS technology and maps | PF | |
J10 | Evaluating and upgrading digital infrastructure time-to-time | PF, RP | |
J11 | Integrate carpooling option | PF, RP | |
J12 | Develop a mobile app version to provide better access | PF |
Research Aspects | Suggested Research Directions |
---|---|
Expanding the scope of the study | Since the SE is a relatively new and rapidly evolving phenomenon, this SLR represents the first attempt to synthesize its key strategies based on existing studies. The articles included in this review, along with other relevant publications, were selected according to an established article selection process and criteria aligned with our study’s focus. This review lays the groundwork for future conceptual and empirical research on SE across various applications. As such, future research can expand upon the current selection process by incorporating more recent articles and exploring SE research across different industries. |
Methodological aspects and applications | The descriptive analysis revealed that the SE studies mainly focus on accommodation and transportation sectors, exhibiting a limited exploration of other industries in sufficient depth. Therefore, the prospect of implementing SE and applying the identified SE strategies from one industry to another is worth exploring in the future. |
To identify the quantitative perception and to validate the effectiveness of the identified SE strategies, future studies could conduct a comprehensive quantitative analysis. This exploration could involve applying statistical methods to measure the performances and success rate of these strategies, depending on various shareable resources and sectors. This approach paves a future research path towards more robust and context-sensitive SE strategies. | |
The importance of an in-depth investigations | Considering the novelty of SE practices across various industries, active government participation is essential. The study revealed the value of implementing an industry-specific and well-regulated legal framework as one of the most required governance-related strategies. Therefore, future research can explore implementing an SE-related legal framework to improve public acceptance of this concept. |
Future research could investigate the implementation process and relevant attributes of fair pricing strategies to maintain the fairness of rates related to the sharing process. This could involve different pricing models based on demand fluctuations, shareable resource availability, and SE users’ involvement. Moreover, researchers could examine how fair pricing can be maintained and explore best practices in implementing fair pricing across various industries. | |
A thorough research initiative is required to explore the actual environmental benefits of the sharing process, considering the material usage and emissions related to it. This could involve evaluating the lifecycle impact of sharing compared to traditional resource ownership models. Future research could analyse key aspects such as energy consumption during manufacturing and maintenance, and GHG emissions related to resource distribution. In particular, future research could analyse whether sharing reduces the demand for new products, thereby lowering overall negative environmental impacts. | |
The study recognised the importance of geographical position when conducting sharing activities. Therefore, future studies could explore the correct strategic position of businesses related to SE by considering population density, tourist attractions, nearest other amenities, social and cultural attributes, etc. | |
It is noteworthy to investigate the accuracy and trustworthiness of ratings and feedback displayed in SE digital platforms and a mechanism to establish and verify a two-way rating system in order to evaluate the deficiencies in digital platforms and SE business. | |
It is worth exploring and mapping the available parking or rest areas, and their storage capacities for SE mobility platform drivers. Researchers could evaluate how these parking and rest areas impact overall driver efficiency, fatigue, and well-being. Assessing the storage capacities is also essential for optimising vehicle management during peak hours in these locations. | |
The study recognised the importance of technology-related strategies: implementing blockchain technology and developing a mobile app-based platform. Therefore, future research can assess the prospect of integrating blockchain technology and developing a mobile app version for each digital platform. | |
This research observed that strategies often exhibit a dual affiliation with two or more categories. Therefore, strategies could be further analysed to explore their relationship with related factors based on the implementing background or the nature of the industry to which they are applied. | |
This SLR explored the strategies that enhance SE in a broader perspective without limiting it to a particular industry. Therefore, future research is needed to investigate the applicability of these strategies in different industries/sectors. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rathnayake, I.; Ochoa, J.J.; Gu, N.; Rameezdeen, R.; Statsenko, L.; Sandhu, S. Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209097
Rathnayake I, Ochoa JJ, Gu N, Rameezdeen R, Statsenko L, Sandhu S. Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2024; 16(20):9097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209097
Chicago/Turabian StyleRathnayake, Ishara, J. Jorge Ochoa, Ning Gu, Raufdeen Rameezdeen, Larissa Statsenko, and Sukhbir Sandhu. 2024. "Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 16, no. 20: 9097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209097
APA StyleRathnayake, I., Ochoa, J. J., Gu, N., Rameezdeen, R., Statsenko, L., & Sandhu, S. (2024). Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 16(20), 9097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209097