Embracing Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing: A Serial Mediation Model to Investigate the Role of Virtual Tourism Experiences in the Formation of Place Attachment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (i)
- How does the sensory experience acquired from a virtual tourism platform during the pre-trip stage influence place attachment, and what mediating effects (if any) exist between these variables?
- (ii)
- What is the impact of virtual tourism experiences on the onsite tourism experience? In addition, how does tourists’ perceived consistency between the virtual and onsite tourism experiences influence the formation of place attachment?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Place Attachment
2.2. Sensory Information from Virtual Tourism Platforms
2.2.1. Visual Aesthetics
2.2.2. Entertainment and Enjoyment
2.3. Psychological Responses to Virtual Tourism Platforms
2.3.1. Virtual Attachment
2.3.2. Sense of Presence
2.4. Cue Consistency Theory
3. Research Methodologies
3.1. Research Hypotheses and Model Construction
3.1.1. Sensory Experience, Virtual Attachment, and Sense of Presence
3.1.2. Virtual Attachment, Sense of Presence, and Cue Consistency
3.1.3. Cue Consistency Theory and Place Attachment
3.2. Research Site and Measurement Design
3.3. Sampling and Data Analytical Process
4. Data Results and Analysis
4.1. Demographic Profile (N = 408)
4.2. Measurement Model
4.3. Hypothesis Testing
5. Conclusions and Discussion
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Theoretical Contributions
5.3. Practical Contributions
5.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Items |
---|---|
Visual aesthetics | The way the virtual tourism platform displays its exhibits is attractive. |
The experience process in the virtual tourism platform attracts me. | |
I love the atmosphere of the virtual tourism platform. | |
Entertainment and enjoyment | I am thrilled about having such an experience. |
I really enjoy this experience. | |
The experience is exciting. | |
I am indulged in the virtual tourism activities. | |
Virtual attachment | I am closely related to the content about destination when using the tourism-related VR activity |
Using the tourism-related VR activity before formal tourism activity is part of my lifestyle | |
I am attached to using the tourism-related VR activity | |
Using the tourism-related VR activity is important to my travel. | |
Sense of presence | During the virtual tourism experience, I felt the normal experience of being in Macau. |
During the virtual tourism experience, the attraction in Macau was the reality for me. | |
When I memorized the virtual tourism experience, the images of attraction in Macau like the place I have visited. | |
During the virtual tourism experience, I was strongest by Macau attractions or of being elsewhere. | |
During the virtual tourism experience, I often thought to myself that I was actual in Macau. | |
Information consistency | The online virtual tourism platform provides consistent information about the relevant content in local destination |
The online virtual tourism platform provides consistent information about a specific topic in local destination. | |
Through the online virtual tourism experience, I am able to get consistent information between online and offline. | |
Overall, information across online and offline is consistent. | |
Image consistency | The image presented in the online virtual tourism platform are consistent with the actual perceived destination image. |
I have a consistent impression about the online and actual tourism experience. | |
MGTO maintains a consistent destination image between online and actual destination image. | |
Place attachment | |
Place identity | This destination (Macau) means a lot to me. |
I am very attached to this destination (Macau). | |
I identify strongly with this destination (Macau). | |
This destination (Macau) is a very special destination to me. | |
Place dependence | I enjoy visiting this destination (Macau) more than any other place. |
I obtain more satisfaction out of visiting this destination (Macau) than any other place. | |
Visiting this destination (Macau) is more important to me than visiting any other place | |
I would not substitute any other place for the type of experience I have in this destination (Macau). |
References
- Curtin, S.; Busby, G. Sustainable destination development: The tour operator perspective. Int. J. Tour. Res. 1999, 1, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.R.; Khan, H.U.R.; Lim, C.K.; Tan, K.L.; Ahmed, M.F. Sustainable tourism policy, destination management and sustainable tourism development: A moderated-mediation model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boluk, K.A.; Cavaliere, C.T.; Higgins-Desbiolles, F. A critical framework for interrogating the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda in tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Hall, C.M.; Esfandiar, K.; Seyfi, S. A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. J. Sustain. Tour. 2023, 31, 1497–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Palace Museum. 2023. Available online: https://pano.dpm.org.cn/#/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
- Statista. Immersive Technology Consumer Market Revenue Worldwide from 2018 to 2023. 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/936078/worldwide-consumer-immersive-technology-market-revenue/#statisticContainer (accessed on 15 August 2024).
- Verma, S.; Warrier, L.; Bolia, B.; Mehta, S. Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2022, 2, 100085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pestek, A.; Sarvan, M. Virtual reality and modern tourism. J. Tour. Futures 2020, 7, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alyahya, M.; McLean, G. Examining tourism consumers’ attitudes and the role of sensory information in virtual reality experiences of a tourist destination. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 1666–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Fesenmaier, D.R. Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications for tourism marketing. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Jiang, X.; Deng, N. Immersive technology: A meta-analysis of augmented/virtual reality applications and their impact on tourism experience. Tour. Manag. 2022, 91, 104534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Lai, I.K.W. How A 360° virtual tour is more effective than photographs on communication effects: The roles of mental imagery processing and a sense of presence. Curr. Issues Tour. 2023, 26, 3813–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jorge, F.; Sousa, N.; Losada, N.; Teixeira, M.S.; Alén, E.; Melo, M.; Bessa, M. Can Virtual Reality be used to create memorable tourist experiences to influence the future intentions of wine tourists? Rev. Tur. Desenvolv. (RTD)/J. Tour. Dev. 2023, 43, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
- Losada, N.; Jorge, F.; Teixeira, M.S.; Sousa, N.; Melo, M.; Bessa, M. Place Attachment Through Virtual Reality: A Comparative Study in Douro Region (Northern Portugal) with Video and ‘Real’Visit. In Marketing and Smart Technologies: Proceedings of ICMarkTech 2021; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 585–594. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.Y. Influence of celebrity involvement on place attachment: Role of destination image in film tourism. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2018, 23, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.J.; Lee, C.J. A tourist’s gaze on local tourism governance: The relationship among local tourism governance and brand equity, tourism attachment for sustainable tourism. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Wu, L.; Li, X.R. When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y. Does vivid imagination deter visitation? The role of mental imagery processing in virtual tourism on tourists’ behavior. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 1528–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Lee, C.K.; Jung, T. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. J. Travel Res. 2020, 59, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, T.M.T.; Akter, S.; Kattiyapornpong, U.; Dwivedi, Y. Reconceptualizing integration quality dynamics for omnichannel marketing. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 87, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, J.K. The impact of influencers’ multi-SNS use on followers’ behavioral intentions: An integration of cue consistency theory and social identity theory. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 74, 103397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, J.W. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values by Yi-Fu Tuan. Geogr. J. 1976, 142, 330–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, G.; Raymond, C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr. 2007, 27, 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzelecka, M.; Boley, B.B.; Woosnam, K.M. Place attachment and empowerment: Do residents need to be attached to be empowered? Ann. Tour. Res. 2017, 66, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.M.; Chen, T.Y.; Chang, S.F. Effect of guide playfulness on the authenticity perception and place attachment of tourists: A cross-level analysis of indigenous tourism of Tsou in Taiwan. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 48, 101170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández, B.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Salazar-Laplace, M.E.; Hess, S. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007, 27, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raymond, C.M.; Brown, G.; Weber, D. The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H.; Smith, L.D.G.; Weiler, B. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 552–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plunkett, D. On place attachments in virtual worlds. World Leis. J. 2011, 53, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, F.; Wang, F.; Wu, B. How does virtual tourism involvement impact the social education effect of cultural heritage? J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023, 28, 100779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rollero, C.; De Piccoli, N. Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stylos, N.; Bellou, V.; Andronikidis, A.; Vassiliadis, C.A. Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Huang, S.; Morrison, A.M.; Wu, B. The effects of virtual reality tourism involvement on place attachment and behavioral intentions: Virtual reality tourism of the Yellow Crane Tower in Wuhan. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2022, 27, 274–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, M.; Gonçalves, G.; Jorge, F.; Losada, N.; Barbosa, L.; Teixeira, M.S.; Bessa, M. The impact of virtual reality and biological sex on the promotion of tourist destinations: Effects on destination image, place attachment, and behavioural intention. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2024, 15, 18–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trang, N.T.; Yoo, J.J.E.; Joo, D.; Lee, G. Incorporating senses into destination image. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023, 27, 100760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corradi, G.; Chuquichambi, E.G.; Barrada, J.R.; Clemente, A.; Nadal, M. A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity. Br. J. Psychol. 2020, 111, 630–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, J.; Schuett, M.A. Examining the relationship between social media users’ motivation and place attachment to national parks. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2023, 44, 100628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.M.; Yeh, Y.S. Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, U.; Chang, K.; Neben, T. Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miniukovich, A.; Figl, K. The effect of prototypicality on webpage aesthetics, usability, and trustworthiness. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2023, 179, 103103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Li, M.; Hu, M.; Li, F.; Lin, B. Distinguishing and quantifying the visual aesthetics of a product: An integrated approach of eye-tracking and EEG. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2019, 71, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iigaya, K.; Yi, S.; Wahle, I.A.; Tanwisuth, K.; O’Doherty, J.P. Aesthetic preference for art emerges from a weighted integration over hierarchically structured visual features in the brain. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.J. Do tech products have a beauty premium? The effect of visual aesthetics of wearables on willingness-to-pay premium and the role of product category involvement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 65, 102872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamborini, R.; Grizzard, M.; Bowman, N.D.; Reinecke, L.; Lewis, R.J.; Eden, A. Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: The contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs. J. Commun. 2011, 61, 1025–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Hall, C.M. A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 46, 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Choi, J.Y. The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 39, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.K.; Huang, H.L. Virtual tourism atmospheres: The effects of pleasure, arousal, and dominance on the acceptance of virtual tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 53, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Yoon, J.H.; Kwon, J. Impact of experiential value of augmented reality: The context of heritage tourism. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, A.A.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Rana, N.P.; Tamilmani, K.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technol. Soc. 2018, 55, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, S.W.; Chang, C.W.; Ma, Y.C. A new reality: Exploring continuance intention to use mobile augmented reality for entertainment purposes. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoang, S.D.; Dey, S.K.; Tučková, Z.; Pham, T.P. Harnessing the power of virtual reality: Enhancing telepresence and inspiring sustainable travel intentions in the tourism industry. Technol. Soc. 2023, 75, 102378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, D.; Arpnikanondt, C. The sweet escape to metaverse: Exploring escapism, anxiety, and virtual place attachment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 150, 107998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Lee, C.K.; Preis, M.W. The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 49, 101349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oleksy, T.; Wnuk, A. Catch them all and increase your place attachment! The role of location-based augmented reality games in changing people-place relations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 76, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Xue, Y. Advancing tourism recovery through virtual tourism marketing: An integrated approach of uses and gratifications theory and attachment to VR. Curr. Issues Tour. 2024, 27, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, D.; Cho, D.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y.; Jia, Z.; Chen, J. Investigating the impact of virtual tourism on travel intention during the post-COVID-19 era: Evidence from China. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2022, 23, 1507–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghali, Z.; Rather, R.A.; Khan, I. Investigating metaverse marketing-enabled consumers’ social presence, attachment, engagement and (re) visit intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 77, 103671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clemente, M.; Rodríguez, A.; Rey, B.; Alcañiz, M. Assessment of the influence of navigation control and screen size on the sense of presence in virtual reality using EEG. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 1584–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, M.; Usoh, M. Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1993, 2, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barranco Merino, R.; Higuera-Trujillo, J.L.; Llinares Millán, C. The Use of Sense of Presence in Studies on Human Behavior in Virtual Environments: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lessiter, J.; Freeman, J.; Keogh, E.; Davidoff, J. A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2001, 10, 282–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iachini, T.; Maffei, L.; Masullo, M.; Senese, V.P.; Rapuano, M.; Pascale, A.; Ruggiero, G. The experience of virtual reality: Are individual differences in mental imagery associated with sense of presence? Cogn. Process. 2019, 20, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regenbrecht, H.T.; Schubert, T.W.; Friedmann, F. Measuring the sense of presence and its relations to fear of heights in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1998, 10, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McRoberts, J. Are we there yet? Media content and sense of presence in non-fiction virtual reality. Stud. Doc. Film 2018, 12, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baños, R.M.; Botella, C.; Alcañiz, M.; Liaño, V.; Guerrero, B.; Rey, B. Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology Behav. 2004, 7, 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- North, M.M.; North, S.M. A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 2016, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, W.; Qi, R.; Zhang, L. Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, L.L. Factors that influence virtual tourism holistic image: The moderating role of sense of presence. Sustainability 2022, 14, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, J.S. Foundations of information integration theory. Am. J. Psychol. 1982, 95, 708–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, M.; Pan, M.; Huang, R. Examining the direct and interaction effects of picture color cues and textual cues related to color on accommodation-sharing platform rental purchase. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 99, 103066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Huang, J.; Li, Y. Examining the effects of authenticity fit and association fit: A digital human avatar endorsement model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isbister, K.; Nass, C. Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2000, 53, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Bi, J.W. Cue congruence effects of attribute performance and hosts’ service quality attributes on room sales on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 3634–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.C.; Cai, S.; Kim, H.W. Cue consistency and page value perception: Implications for web-based catalog design. Inf. Manag. 2013, 50, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Chua, B.L.; Kim, H.C.; Han, H. Shaping and enhancing airport lounge experiences: The application of brand personality and image congruity theories. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 2901–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmer, S.E.; Schloss, K.B.; Sammartino, J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013, 64, 77–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorderer, P.; Klimmt, C.; Ritterfeld, U. Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Commun. Theory 2004, 14, 388–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Augustin, M.D.; Wagemans, J.; Carbon, C.C. All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. Acta Psychol. 2012, 139, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavie, T.; Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2004, 60, 269–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassini, S.; Laumann, K. Questionnaire measures and physiological correlates of presence: A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Z.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Qiu, H. Can gamification improve the virtual reality tourism experience? Analyzing the mediating role of tourism fatigue. Tour. Manag. 2023, 96, 104715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.A.; Jeong, M. Enhancing online brand experiences: An application of congruity theory. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 40, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, R.B.; Blackmon, T.T.; Liu, A.; Mellers, B.A.; Stark, L.W. The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1996, 5, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witmer, B.G.; Singer, M.J. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 1998, 7, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mkono, M.; Tribe, J. Beyond reviewing: Uncovering the multiple roles of tourism social media users. J. Travel Res. 2017, 56, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devine-Wright, P. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasar, J.L. The effect of sign complexity and coherence on the perceived quality of retail scenes. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1987, 53, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Lehto, X.Y.; Morrison, A.M. Destination image representation on the web: Content analysis of Macau travel related websites. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, C.T.; Parham, L.D. Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. Am. J. Occup. Ther. Off. Publ. Am. Occup. Ther. Assoc. 2002, 56, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, R.A. A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Mark. Lett. 2000, 11, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevlin, M.; Miles, J.N.V.; Davies, M.N.O.; Walker, S. Coefficient alpha: A useful indicator of reliability? Personal. Individ. Differ. 2000, 28, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, A.C.; Windmeijer, F.A. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J. Econom. 1997, 77, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisser, S. A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 1974, 61, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1974, 36, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shmueli, G.; Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.H.; Ting, H.; Vaithilingam, S.; Ringle, C.M. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur. J. Mark. 2019, 53, 2322–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, J.; Rainoldi, M.; Egger, R. Virtual reality in tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tour. Rev. 2019, 74, 586–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, B.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, Q. Rural environmental landscape construction based on virtual reality technology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, K.; Geng, C.; Su, X. Antecedents of residents’ pro-tourism behavioral intention: Place image, place attachment, and attitude. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usakli, A.; Kucukergin, K.G.; Shi, D.; Okumus, F. Does self-congruity or functional congruity better predict destination attachment? A higher-order structural model. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2022, 23, 100686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Hwang, J. Dawn or dusk? Will virtual tourism begin to boom? An integrated model of AIDA, TAM, and UTAUT. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2024, 48, 991–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S.; Orús, C. The influence of scent on virtual reality experiences: The role of aroma-content congruence. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirillova, K.; Lehto, X. Destination aesthetics and aesthetic distance in tourism experience. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2015, 32, 1051–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Gordon, S.; Buhalis, D.; Ding, X. Experience value cocreation on destination online platforms. J. Travel Res. 2018, 57, 1093–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Chiou, S.C. A study on the sustainable development of historic district landscapes based on place attachment among tourists: A case study of Taiping old street, Taiwan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Huang, L.; Xu, C.; He, K.; Shen, K.; Liang, P. Analysis of the mediating role of place attachment in the link between tourists’ authentic experiences of, involvement in, and loyalty to rural tourism. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marder, B.; Erz, A.; Angell, R.; Plangger, K. The role of photograph aesthetics on online review sites: Effects of management-versus traveler-generated photos on tourists’ decision making. J. Travel Res. 2021, 60, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walters, G.; Sparks, B.; Herington, C. The effectiveness of print advertising stimuli in evoking elaborate consumption visions for potential travelers. J. Travel Res. 2007, 46, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, M.; Coelho, H.; Gonçalves, G.; Losada, N.; Jorge, F.; Teixeira, M.S.; Bessa, M. Immersive multisensory virtual reality technologies for virtual tourism: A study of the user’s sense of presence, satisfaction, emotions, and attitudes. Multimed. Syst. 2022, 28, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pencarelli, T. The digital revolution in the travel and tourism industry. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2020, 22, 455–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Go, H.; Kang, M. Metaverse tourism for sustainable tourism development: Tourism agenda 2030. Tour. Rev. 2023, 78, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 179 | 43.9% |
Female | 229 | 56.1% | |
Age | 18–25 | 32 | 7.8% |
26–35 | 139 | 34.1% | |
36–45 | 89 | 21.8% | |
46–55 | 70 | 17.2% | |
56 and above | 78 | 19.1% |
Variable | Factor Loadings | Cronbach’s α | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Visual aesthetics | 0.799 | 0.882 | 0.713 | |
VAE1 | 0.839 | |||
VAE2 | 0.843 | |||
VAE3 | 0.850 | |||
Entertainment and enjoyment | 0.846 | 0.897 | 0.684 | |
EAE1 | 0.847 | |||
EAE2 | 0.810 | |||
EAE3 | 0.807 | |||
EAE4 | 0.843 | |||
Virtual attachment | 0.847 | 0.897 | 0.685 | |
VAT1 | 0.844 | |||
VAT2 | 0.823 | |||
VAT3 | 0.834 | |||
VAT4 | 0.810 | |||
Sense of presence | 0.877 | 0.910 | 0.670 | |
SOP1 | 0.826 | |||
SOP2 | 0.822 | |||
SOP3 | 0.811 | |||
SOP4 | 0.814 | |||
SOP5 | 0.819 | |||
Information consistency | 0.730 | 0.832 | 0.553 | |
INC1 | 0.727 | |||
INC2 | 0.717 | |||
INC3 | 0.767 | |||
INC4 | 0.762 | |||
Image consistency | 0.823 | 0.895 | 0.739 | |
IMC1 | 0.858 | |||
IMC2 | 0.864 | |||
IMC3 | 0.857 | |||
Place attachment | 0.925 | 0.939 | 0.657 | |
Place identity | ||||
PID1 | 0.830 | |||
PID2 | 0.860 | |||
PID3 | 0.835 | |||
PID4 | 0.844 | |||
Place dependence | ||||
PDE1 | 0.821 | |||
PDE2 | 0.852 | |||
PDE3 | 0.828 | |||
PDE4 | 0.853 |
Constructs | EAE | IMC | INC | PA | SOP | VAE | VAT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAE | 0.827 | ||||||
IMC | 0.433 | 0.860 | |||||
INC | 0.729 | 0.706 | 0.744 | ||||
PA | 0.437 | 0.564 | 0.629 | 0.811 | |||
SOP | 0.668 | 0.443 | 0.538 | 0.463 | 0.818 | ||
VAE | 0.631 | 0.461 | 0.531 | 0.457 | 0.560 | 0.844 | |
VAT | 0.556 | 0.413 | 0.612 | 0.424 | 0.473 | 0.646 | 0.828 |
Construct | R2 | Q2 |
---|---|---|
VAT | 0.792 | 0.538 |
SOP | 0.816 | 0.541 |
INC | 0.507 | 0.280 |
IMC | 0.196 | 0.143 |
PA | 0.775 | 0.505 |
Hypotheses | Standardised Path Coefficients | Results |
---|---|---|
H1a: VAE→VAT | 0.437 *** | Supported |
H1b: VAE→SOP | 0.494 *** | Supported |
H2a: EAE→VAT | 0.493 *** | Supported |
H2b: EAE→SOP | 0.494 *** | Supported |
H3: VAT→INC | 0.712 *** | Supported |
H4: SOP→IMC | 0.443 *** | Supported |
H5: INC→PA | 0.238 *** | Supported |
H6: IMC→PA | 0.696 *** | Supported |
Hypotheses | 95% Confidence Interval | Path Coefficients | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.5% | 97.5% | |||
H7a: VAE→VAT→INC→PA | 0.049 | 0.103 | 0.074 | Supported |
H7b: VAE→SOP→IMC→PA | 0.107 | 0.174 | 0.139 | Supported |
H8a: EAE→VAT→ INC→ PA | 0.057 | 0.113 | 0.083 | Supported |
H8b: EAE→SOP→IMC→PA | 0.121 | 0.187 | 0.152 | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Luo, J.; Xia, M. Embracing Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing: A Serial Mediation Model to Investigate the Role of Virtual Tourism Experiences in the Formation of Place Attachment. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310551
Luo J, Xia M. Embracing Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing: A Serial Mediation Model to Investigate the Role of Virtual Tourism Experiences in the Formation of Place Attachment. Sustainability. 2024; 16(23):10551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310551
Chicago/Turabian StyleLuo, Jingjia, and Menglong Xia. 2024. "Embracing Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing: A Serial Mediation Model to Investigate the Role of Virtual Tourism Experiences in the Formation of Place Attachment" Sustainability 16, no. 23: 10551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310551
APA StyleLuo, J., & Xia, M. (2024). Embracing Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing: A Serial Mediation Model to Investigate the Role of Virtual Tourism Experiences in the Formation of Place Attachment. Sustainability, 16(23), 10551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310551