The authors would like to make the following corrections about the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
- (1)
- Replacing the “All 14 different major subjects offered at the university were represented (n = 1294)” in the Section 3.3 “Sample” on page 10.
- with
All 11 major subjects from one B.A. study program and three teacher training study programs offered at the university were represented (n = 1294).
- (2)
- Authors Replacing: Authors would like to change 18 parts of the table content, so we need to replace the original Table 3 in Section 3.3 “Sample” on page 10:
Table 3.
Sample distributions.
Table 3.
Sample distributions.
| Pilot Study | Present Study | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |
| Total Sample | 1740 | 100.00 | 2730 | 100.00 |
| Response (Rate) | 913 | 52.00 | 1364 | 49.90 |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 558 | 61.11 | 477 | 34.97 |
| Male | 304 | 33.29 | 258 | 18.91 |
| Not indicated | 51 | 0.06 | 73 | 5.35 |
| Age | - | - | 1244 | 91.20 |
| Study program | ||||
| B.A. Teaching and Learning | 111 | 12.16 | 242 | 17.74 |
| B.A. Social Education | 32 | 3.50 | 57 | 4.18 |
| B.A. Business Education | 27 | 2.96 | 48 | 3.52 |
| Major subject | ||||
| Business Administration | 156 | 17.09 | 214 | 15.69 |
| Business Information systems | 23 | 2.52 | 58 | 4.25 |
| Cultural Science | 202 | 22.12 | 198 | 14.52 |
| Digital Media | - | 0.00 | 25 | 1.83 |
| Economics | 20 | 2.19 | 34 | 2.49 |
| Environmental Science* | 105 | 11.50 | 179 | 13.12 |
| Studium Individuale | 16 | 1.75 | 33 | 2.42 |
| Industrial Engineering | 42 | 4.60 | 43 | 3.15 |
| Business Law | 70 | 7.67 | 43 | 3.15 |
| Political Science | 18 | 1.97 | 32 | 2.35 |
| (Organizational) Psychology | 73 | 8.00 | 88 | 6.45 |
| Total | 895 | 98.30 | 1289 | 94.50 |
Note: Age was not included in the pilot study. The major subject Digital Media has been introduced in 2014. Environmental Science including the students from Global Environmental and Sustainability Science.
- With
Table 3.
Sample distributions.
Table 3.
Sample distributions.
| Pilot Study | Present Study | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |
| Total Sample | 1740 | 100.00 | 2730 | 100.00 |
| Response (Rate) | 913 | 52.47 | 1364 | 49.96 |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 558 | 61.11 | 851 | 62.39 |
| Male | 304 | 33.29 | 440 | 32.26 |
| Not indicated | 51 | 5.60 | 73 | 5.35 |
| Age | - | - | 1244 | 91.20 |
| Teacher Training Study Programs | ||||
| B.A. Teaching and Learning | 111 | 12.16 | 242 | 17.74 |
| B.A. Social Education | 32 | 3.50 | 57 | 4.18 |
| B.A. Business Education | 27 | 2.96 | 48 | 3.52 |
| B.A. General (Major Subjects) | ||||
| Business Administration | 156 | 17.09 | 214 | 15.69 |
| Business Information systems | 23 | 2.52 | 58 | 4.25 |
| Cultural Science | 202 | 22.12 | 198 | 14.52 |
| Digital Media | - | 0.00 | 25 | 1.83 |
| Economics | 20 | 2.19 | 34 | 2.49 |
| Environmental Science * | 105 | 11.50 | 179 | 13.12 |
| Studium Individuale | 16 | 1.75 | 33 | 2.42 |
| Industrial Engineering | 42 | 4.60 | 43 | 3.15 |
| Business Law | 70 | 7.67 | 43 | 3.15 |
| Political Science | 18 | 1.97 | 32 | 2.35 |
| (Organizational) Psychology | 73 | 8.00 | 88 | 6.45 |
| Missing | 18 | 1.97 | 70 | 5.14 |
| Total | 913 | 100.00 | 1364 | 100.00 |
Note: Age was not included in the pilot study. The major subject Digital Media has been introduced in 2014. * Environmental Science including the students from Global Environmental and Sustainability Science.
- (3)
- Deleting two sentences in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11.
- The deleted parts read as follows:
- Median values have been compared with Wilcoxon ranked sign test for paired samples because the scores for environmental (D (1.154) = 0.20, p < 0.001), sociocultural (D (1.154) = 0.11, p < 0.001) and economic dimensions of sustainability conceptions (D (1.154) = 0.10, p < 0.001) were deviating significantly from normal.
- All median values were significantly different (p < 0.001) and effect sizes varied from r = 0.57 to r = 0.36.
- (4)
- Adding a new paragraph in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11 as the last paragraph of the section:
Median values have been compared with the Wilcoxon ranked sign test for paired samples because the scores for environmental, sociocultural and economic dimensions of sustainability conceptions were deviating significantly from normal, as indicated by the Shapiro-Wilk test (all p < 0.001). The Wilcoxon ranked sign test indicated that the medians were significantly different (ZEcon/Env = −27.76, r = −0.82; ZEnv/Soccul = −24.09, r = −0.71; ZEcon/Soccul = −17.31, r = −0.51; p < 0.001).
- (5)
- Authors Replacing: Authors would like to change 4 parts of the table content, so we need to replace the original Table 4 in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11:
Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.
Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.
| Variable | Name | Category | Frequencies | % (n = 1364) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV | SEX | Female | 477 | 34.97 |
| Male | 258 | 18.91 | ||
| No answer | 73 | 5.35 | ||
| IV | FEE | ESD in School | 633 | 46.40 |
| No ESD in School | 254 | 18.60 | ||
| DV | PPRCURRENT | Yes | 631 | 46.30 |
| No | 170 | 12.50 | ||
| DV | PPRFUTURE | Yes | 712 | 52.20 |
| No | 122 | 8.90 |
Note: Entries calculated with SPSS 24.
- With
Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.
Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.
| Variable | Name | Category | Frequencies | % (n = 1364) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV | SEX | Female | 851 | 62.39 |
| Male | 440 | 32.26 | ||
| No answer | 73 | 5.35 | ||
| IV | FEE | ESD in School | 633 | 46.40 |
| No ESD in School | 254 | 18.60 | ||
| DV | PPRCURRENT | Yes | 631 | 46.30 |
| No | 170 | 12.50 | ||
| DV | PPRFUTURE | Yes | 712 | 52.20 |
| No | 122 | 8.90 |
Note: Entries calculated with SPSS 24.
The authors and the Editorial Office would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers, and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Reference
- Sundermann, A.; Fischer, D. How Does Sustainability Become Professionally Relevant? Exploring the Role of Sustainability Conceptions in First Year Students. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).