Next Article in Journal
Drivers of Student Social Entrepreneurial Intention Amid the Economic Crisis in Lebanon: A Mediation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Educational Practice in Education for Environmental Justice: A Systematic Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integration of Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Index and Biophysical Assessment for Sustainable Ecotourism Mangrove: A Case Study of Karangsong, Indonesia

by
Donny Juliandri Prihadi
1,2,*,
Guanghai Zhang
1,
Ghulam M. Lahbar
1 and
Buntora Pasaribu
2,3
1
Department Tourism Management, College of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266005, China
2
Department Marine Sciences, Faculty Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
3
Shallow Coastal and Aquatic Forensic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Fishery and Marine Science, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2806; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072806
Submission received: 10 February 2024 / Revised: 18 March 2024 / Accepted: 20 March 2024 / Published: 28 March 2024

Abstract

:
Marine ecotourism is one of the pivotal sectors that supports the sustainability of marine ecosystems and elevates the socioeconomic status of the country. Karangsong is located on the northern side of the Indramayu districts, covering approximately 25 hectares of mangrove. The significant number of tourists visiting sites of mangrove ecotourism in Indonesia contributed to the tourist intentions associated with the diversity of mangrove and management strategies. How the community-based tourism (CBT) index aligns with biophysical assessment is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the interconnectedness between the community-based tourism (CBT) index and biophysical assessment to measure the ratio number of tourists using the carrying capacity and sustainability index in Karangsong. A potential new suitability index for mangrove tourism was created. The various factors such as the mangrove ecosystem, substrate, and suitability that impacted the development of mangrove tourism were quantitatively analyzed. Our study identified that the majority of mangrove ecotourism sites in Karangsong Indramayu Regency consist of rich diverse mangrove species. The biophysical characteristics of the mangrove ecosystem were assessed with a suitability index of 83.7%. Our results indicated that the operations of mangrove tourism in the Karangsong region are well-managed and maintained. The region has a carrying capacity of 803 people/day, which refers to the maximum number of individuals for this area. This finding provides a more detailed understanding of the contribution of the new sustainability index of mangrove tourism and community-based tourism (CBT) approach assessing the potential development and challenges in the management of mangrove forests ecotourism.

1. Introduction

Indonesia is an archipelago country that is enriched with a diverse marine ecosystem and marine biodiversity. The islands of Indonesia are dominated by various coastal characteristics, including sandy, rocky, cliffs, and mangrove forests. Recently, it was reported that Indonesia has roughly 17,466 islands, with only 16,065 islands registered in the United Nations [1]. Thus, the remaining 1401 islands need to be officially ratified by government consensus [2]. Coastal areas are defined as transitional regions between land and ocean. A coastal region has two boundaries or borders such as parallel borders to the coastline and a boundary that is perpendicular to the coastline (the area near the shore region of the coastline) [2,3]. Coastal areas contain valuable resources that can be utilized by communities to enhance their socio-economic livelihood through marine tourism [4,5]. Marine tourism holds significant importance as it plays a key role in the global tourism industry, especially in coastal regions. Marine tourism has the potential to elevate the economic growth in local communities by increasing their natural maritime heritage. This can lead to various business opportunities in hospitality, recreation, and conservation efforts, ultimately benefiting both the economy and the people who live in the ecotourism area. There are two limitations that impact the coastline for marine tourism including long-shore (parallel to the coastline) and cross-shore (perpendicular to the coastline) [6]. Marine tourism in Indonesia is mostly concentrated in parallel borders, which have an impact on marine ecosystems due to the high concentration of tourism activities [7,8].
The coastal region of Indonesia has become a potential area for the tourism development sector, consisting of mangrove forest, seagrass meadow, and coral reefs [9]. The Indonesian total mangrove area is approximately 3.5 million hectares. Mangroves provide benefits to ecosystem by serving as a home to unique vegetation, terrestrial, and aquatic fauna, supporting the production of other marine ecosystems (e.g., photosynthesis, nutrient production), and regulate physical and ecological processes that occur in the mangrove environment [10]. Recently, the utilization of a potential mangrove ecosystem for ecotourism has widely attracted tourist interest in exploring the nature of mangrove ecosystems as a nature-based tourism destination [11,12]. The mangrove ecosystem is beneficial for elevating the socio-economics of local communities, as well as serving as a conservation tool to preserve the mangrove forest from damage [10].
Despite the mangrove forest attraction in Karangsong, there are many potential factors of Karangsong as an attractive destination related to ecotourism that can be developed including the beach and diving sites of corals’ diversity [13,14,15]. Ecotourism emphasizes sustainable travel, environmental conservation, and educating travelers about nature. It encourages responsible visits to natural areas, aiming to protect the environment and benefit local communities. Conversely, ‘Sun and Sea’ tourism involves large numbers of tourists visiting coastal areas for leisure activities like sunbathing and swimming. This type of tourism follows seasonal patterns, with peak visits during favorable weather conditions, resulting in high visitor concentrations. The relationship between the two lies in their impact on destinations and communities. However, we first measure the index of tourism of mangrove forest destination that is essential to examine the factors in developing the attractiveness of the travel and tourism competitiveness in Karangsong. To date, there are 15 areas of ecotourism in Indonesia through the DMO (destination management operation) which were developed for tourist destinations including Pangandaran in West java, Tanjung Puting in East Kalimantan, Komodo Island in Flores, Raja Ampat in Papua, Toba Lake in North Sumatera, Bromo Tengger in Sumeru, Batur in Bali Island, Kota Tua in Jakarta, Rinjani in Lombok, Derawan in Kalimantan, Waktobi in Sulawesi, Bunaken in Manado, Toraja in Sulawesi, Sabang in Aceh [9]. The development of ecotourism and the provision of tourism infrastructure could impact the physical, social, cultural, and economic aspects of the environment. Therefore, the degradation of coastal and marine ecosystems due to overexploitation is a main concern in the context of utilizing resources for marine ecotourism. It is essential to adopt a management framework based on the carrying capacity formulation, which is crucial for the future development of marine ecotourism. This approach aims to formulate management directives conducive to sustainable marine ecotourism. However, Karangsong as a potential ecotourism destination through the index analysis has never been investigated.
Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the biophysical aspects, community involvement, and management potential of the mangrove forest in Karangsong as a possible world-class ecotourism destination. Additionally, the research involves assessing the tourism index using the carrying capacity (CCR) approach and evaluating the index for tourism destination development. We also expand our investigation to address the challenges surrounding ecotourism development in Karangsong. Furthermore, this research offers a comprehensive examination and data analysis of the various obstacles to ecotourism development in Karangsong, with potential implications for practitioners, entrepreneurs, and researchers seeking to develop Karangsong into a world-class ecotourism destination.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Mangrove Ecotourism Karangsong, Karangsong Village, Indramayu Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia. Indramayu Regency is located at 107°52 east longitude, 108°36 (BT), and 6°15′–6°40′ south latitude (LS). The Karangsong mangrove ecotourism is approximately 204,011 hectares, consisting of 31 administrative districts and 302 villages. According to the forest and plantation statistics conducted in 2017, it is among the most severely damaged mangrove ecosystems in West Java. Mangrove ecosystems are vital for the environment, community, and economy, and they have become increasingly popular as ecotourism destinations due to their unique biodiversity and the ecosystem services they provide. Ecotourism could facilitate the balancing of economic activity with conservation efforts. The mitigation efforts for mangrove ecotourism are beneficial to continuously conduct the conservation and restoration of mangrove forests. Based on the analysis of satellite image data, 1103 Ha were recorded in 2008, while 8023 Ha represent conservation forest [16]. Nevertheless, numerous mangroves developed from 2008 to 2017. A map of the mangrove location in Karangsong Indramayu is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Sampling/Selection

This research was conducted from January 2020 to August 2020. The sampling was conducted using cross-section lines by mapping the specific location of mangrove through a surveying approach. The section lines were drawn from the initial reference point to the outermost mangrove tree perpendicular to the coastline. The length of each transect line was 50 m. The sample cross lines are presented in Figure 2. The mangrove ecosystems’ vegetation was analyzed to investigate the relative density of mangrove (Equation (1)). The equation is described below:
D e n s i t y I n d / h a = N u m b e r   o f   i n d i v i d u a l s   o f   o n e   t y p e C o m p l e t e   p l o t   a r e a
where Density is the unit of mangrove per hectare, a value of obtained from the number individuals of one type divided by the complete plot area.

2.3. Analysis of Substrate

Substrate or sediment was collected from each research station. The samples were collected using a grab sampler and then inserted into a sample bag to analyze sediment particles. The method was conducted by using a sieve with large Wentworth particles following previous studies from [2,17] with some modification. The sediment analysis method was investigated at the Marine Science Laboratory of the Faculty Fishery and Marine Science University, Padjadjaran. The method used for substrate classification followed the previous procedures of [2,17] with some modification.

2.4. Measurement of Carrying Capacity Region (CCR) in Karangsong Mangrove

In this study, the CCR method was used to calculate the supporting power of natural ecotourism development using the concept of the region’s carrying capacity (CCR). The CCR represented the maximum number/ population of visitors in the area provided at any given time without causing interference with nature and humans that can be supported or sustained by an ecosystem over time [18,19,20]. The calculation of CCR was formulated using the Yulianda proposed modification of the CCR model [21].
C C R = K × L p L t × W t W p
where CCR (carrying capacity region) can be calculated with the parameter of K viewed as the maximum number of visitors per unit area. The K coefficient of carrying capacity refers to the maximum number of visitors a destination can accommodate without compromising the quality of the tourist experience or causing irreversible harm to the environment, society, culture, or economy. It serves as a crucial measure of tourism’s impact on space and the environment.
The length of area Lp is the area or length of the area that can be utilized, Lt is the unit area for a specific category, Wt is the time provided by the area for travel activities in one day, and Wp is the time spent by visitors for each specific activity.

2.5. Data Analysis

Data analysis used the statistical descriptive analysis approach. The analysis demonstrated the mangrove biophysical parameters in a table prior to the new suitability index for mangrove tourism and the optimum number of visitors in the mangrove tourism area. The mangrove suitability index in Karangsong was determined based on the 10 criteria, including density, mangrove species, thickness mangrove, association biota, long of river, wide of river, depth of river, substrates, tourist facility, and tourist attributes. Tourist facilities and attributes indicators are described to measure the total amount of well-developed infrastructure necessary for sustainable tourism management in ecotourism areas for tourists.

3. Results

3.1. The Density of the Karangsong Mangrove Ecosystem

The efforts to protect the Karangsong mangrove forest were initiated in 2008. The area of the Karangsong mangrove covers approximately 25 hectares. Our study assessed the mangrove density at eight stations in the Karangsong mangrove area. Our results revealed that the dominant mangrove species in the area were Avicennia sp. and Rhizophora sp. (Figure 3). Among the stations, Station V exhibited a high density, while the remaining stations were classified as damaged forests due to their density being less than 1200 trees/ha (Table 1). Despite improvements in mangrove density and quality over the years, the Karangsong mangrove forests are still expanding. However, the low density of vegetation and limited number of mangrove species in the waters of Karangsong pose a threat to the ecosystem.
To address this issue, it is crucial to promote a general understanding of mangrove ecosystems and disseminate knowledge about their importance. The efforts of mangrove conservation can play a vital role in encouraging key decision-makers to prioritize the sustainability of these valuable ecosystems [22].

3.2. Water Quality and DO (Dissolved Oxygen) Characteristics in Karangsong Mangrove Forest

This study was conducted in the mangrove forest area of Karangsong, which is a designated conservation reserve located in the village of Karangsong, Indramayu District. Our study focused on observing the characteristics of the habitat ecosystem by measuring water quality parameters and substrate types. In recent study, we measured water quality and assessed substrate characteristics at each sampling station with three replicated measurements. Our findings revealed that the temperature ranged from 28.5 °C to 31 °C across the sites (Table 2). Generally, the temperature at each site was consistent and within the normal range to support the mangrove ecosystem. The highest water temperature of 31 °C was recorded at Station I, indicating relatively warm water compared to other stations. Conversely, the minimum water temperature of 28.5 °C was observed at Station II, suggesting relatively cooler water compared to other stations. These temperature variations across different stations provide strong evidence of spatial differences in water temperature within the Karangsong ecosystem.
Water salinity is an important factor that affects the growth, survival, and zoning of mangrove species. Our result showed the salinity readings for Stations I–VIII ranged from 27‰ to 29‰. (Table 2). Salinity changes are influenced by a mixture of fresh and seawater. The second station, located on the ship dock and accessible to tourists, had the lowest salinity and was closer to the land. Our results showed lower salinity compared to Station III along the sea, indicating that the mangrove ecosystem in Karangsong is considered a brackish area. It is worth noting the optimal salinity for mangrove growth is within the range of 10–30 ppt [23], and the salinity in Karangsong falls within this range. The dissolved oxygen (DO) values for Stations I–VIII ranged from 5.2 to 6.4 mg/L, which is the minimum threshold. The highest DO value was found at Station I, while the lowest DO value was found at Station II. The content of dissolved oxygen in water is crucial for the survival of aquatic organisms. Oxygen solubility is influenced by water temperature and salinity. It has been reported that mangroves can survive under conditions where the oxygen content exceeds 4 mg/L [24]. However, as temperature and salinity increase, oxygen solubility decreases. It is important to note that DO measurements conducted in the morning may yield lower results due to the absence of photosynthesis and the prevalence of respiratory processes. Acidity, represented by pH, also plays a significant role in the life of mangroves, as it affects the availability of nutrients for vegetation. The pH values of the water at the mangrove stations were within the suitable range for mangrove plants, typically ranging from 5 to 8.5. Station I had a maximum pH of 7.5, while Stations III to VIII had a minimum pH of 7.33 (Table 2).

3.3. Karangsong Mangrove Forest Substrates

The substrate identification results are provided in Table 3. The substrate analysis used statistical descriptive analysis incorporating collection data and the observation of substrate texture. At Station I, the observed substrate consists of mud sand, with 0.1% gravel, 74.3% sand, and 25.6% mud. Station II exhibits a sand substrate comprising 0% gravel, 82.9% sand, and 17.1% mud. Station III shows a sand substrate consisting of 0% gravel, 96% sand, and 4% mud. Similarly, at Station IV, the substrate is primarily sand, with no gravel, consisting of 93.6% sand and 6.4% mud. Station V has a sand substrate of 96% sand and 4% mud, while Station VI has a substrate composition of 93.5% sand and 6.5% mud. Station VII consists of 95% sand and 5% mud, and Station VIII comprises 95.5% sand and 5% mud. Our result showed that the Karangsong mangrove vegetation soil grows better in the mud sand texture.

3.4. Biota Association in Karangsong Mangrove Ecosystem

The five types of biota found in Karangsong, Indramayu, are closely associated with mangroves. The data collected for this research comprise 17 subgroups representing these five types (Table 4). The presence of various species, including fish, crabs, mollusks, reptiles, and birds, within the mangrove forest enhances the appeal of the habitats in Karangsong, Indramayu. Aquatic wildlife inhabiting the area includes (a) water-dwelling animals, such as various fish and shrimp species, and (b) substrate-dwelling animals, particularly crabs, shells, and various invertebrates [2]. The existence of these diverse biota contributes to the ecotourism potential development in the Karangsong mangrove forest. Protecting the biota residing in the mangrove area is crucial. The mangrove community plays a vital role in the growth, reproduction, feeding, and spawning of these organisms, while also serving as a source of nutrition for wildlife. This interaction with coastal human communities often becomes an economic commodity [2].
Mangrove ecotourism in Karangsong aims to educate tourists and aligns closely with the principles of conservation. The general public receives comprehensive information on the biodiversity found in the mangrove area, including the lifestyles, habits, breeding patterns, habitat formation, and aesthetic beauty of various animals and plants [2]. This knowledge dissemination creates a sense of joy and appreciation. The biophysical relationship with mangrove ecosystem suitability can be explained through the use of a suitability matrix and descriptive analysis that considers parameters such as the density, type, thickness, width, and length of the relevant rivers and substrates [21] (Table 5). Furthermore, this activity can serve as a monitoring tool to prevent the exploitation of mangrove wood and to preserve and protect natural vegetation.

3.5. Assessment Index for Tourist Destination Development

The suitability index results for the mangrove ecosystems, as presented in Table 6, indicate that the research sites in Karangsong have high potential as tourist destinations. With a mangrove ecotourism index of 83.7%, Karangsong is considered an ideal location for planning mangrove tourism, ensuring a satisfying and enjoyable experience for tourists. The presence of mangrove tourism in Karangsong can contribute to the preservation and conservation of the mangrove ecosystem while offering visitors a unique tourist destination. In terms of facilities, it is essential to address certain shortcomings, particularly regarding toilets and meeting points in Karangsong mangrove forest, Indramayu. The existing toilets are often traditional and not consistently clean, posing challenges for some tourists. Therefore, adequate clean water supply is also a primary concern for the tourist destination development system. To address these issues, the questionnaire administered to tourists identified the weaknesses in the current tourist facilities. Tourists expressed their preference for clean and well-maintained toilets and a reasonable number of meeting points within the area.
Mangrove tourism, as a form of ecotourism, offers a range of appealing activities to attract tourists from around the world. These activities may include bamboo trail walks, bird watching, beach trips, exploring the biota, and boat trips [2]. Ecotourism combines sustainable tourism practices with the utilization of natural resources in a manner that generates revenue, fosters an appreciation for traditional culture and the environment, and promotes education. It also encourages the participation of local communities dedicated to protecting natural resources and the environment [25]. Local communities in Karangsong mangrove actively engaged in wildlife protection and habitat restoration activities.

3.6. Carrying Capacity Region (CCR) in Karangsong Mangrove Tourism Destination

The broad calculations and analysis of the ecotourism maps indicate that the mangrove forest in Karangsong can accommodate a tour track of 1.4 km (Lt) within a land area of 25 hectares (Lp). According to the potential ecological and temporal prediction table [21], it is observed that for a 50 m (Lt) runway, the combined unit area of potential ecological visitors (K) for mangrove tourism is 1 person. Visitors typically spend 2 h (Wp) on the mangrove forest tour, while the average time available in the region during a day is 9 h (Wt). Based on these calculations, the tourist carrying capacity (CCR) of the Karangsong ecotourism mangrove in the ecotourism zone is estimated to be 803 people per day. This capacity allows for the provision of necessary facilities such as toilets, mushola (prayer hall), rinsing rooms, and a watchtower. It is important for maintainers to consistently focus on the maintenance of bamboo tracks/roads in the surrounding area of the ecotourism mangroves.
To ensure a satisfactory experience for the daily influx of 803 people and to accommodate potential increases, particularly on weekends, it is advisable for the management to provide various activities and distribute tourists across different destinations. The utilization of coastal areas and sandy beaches, as well as the addition of other activities within the ecotourism area, can help to prevent overcrowding. Additionally, the management may consider implementing limits on the number of incoming tourists on certain days, such as Sundays, to preserve the environment of the mangrove forest. Typically, between 500 and 600 people visit on Sundays/weekends, requiring special attention from the management to maintain the quality of the mangrove environment. Facilities and infrastructure play a crucial role in supporting the successful development of the region [11,26]. The carrying capacity region (CCR) value serves as an indicator for tourism potential and sustainable tourism management. The selection and planning of tourism activities should be aligned with the available resources, focusing not only on mangroves but also on other habitats. Ecotourism should be consistent with environmental protection, community participation, economics, education, and sustainability [27]. Sustainable ecotourism encompasses environmental, social and cultural, and economic sustainability [28]. Considering scientific evidence and knowledge transfer, politics should be guided by scientific information [28].

4. Discussion

4.1. Biophysical Characteristics of the Karangsong Mangrove Forest

We observed that the highest composition of mangrove species (trees) at the observation site is Avicennia marina which amounts to 70% of the total number of trees at the observation site. Rhizophora apiculata represents 20%, while the lowest is Rhizopora stylosa at 10% of the total. Progressive changes in sediments and habitats can affect mangrove zoning. The availability of propagule is suspected to have an impact on the reproductive process. If the environmental conditions are met, the mangroves will be able to complete the reproduction process. This is related to mangroves’ ability to adapt to extreme conditions, such as a new mud eruption which will be dominated by the plants whose propagation is highest in that place [29]. Furthermore, our results showed lower salinity compared to Station III along the sea, indicating that the mangrove ecosystem in Karangsong is considered a brackish area. It is worth noting that the optimal salinity for mangrove growth is within the range of 10–30 ppt, and the salinity in Karangsong falls within this range [23].
Our study showed the temperature difference may be due to changes in sunlight intensity. Station III is at the highest temperature because it is near the beach and in an open area, so Station III has a high light intensity, whereas Station I is located in the dock area of the ships and is covered and closed, so the light intensity is low. The temperature measured throughout the site is within the mangrove ecosystem tolerance threshold, and the mangrove ideal seawater temperature is 28–32 °C. Generally, the temperature at each site is in a range that supports marine biota life such as mangrove crabs (Scylla serata) and violin crabs (Uca sp.) [24].
The pH range observed at the four stations are consistent with the suitable range of mangrove ecosystem (Table 2). The pH values of the substrate at the survey site also support mangrove life. The substrate identification procedure revealed that Station I has a sand substrate, while Stations II–VIII have sand substrates as well. Although mangroves mainly grow in mud, these marine plants can also thrive in various types of substrates such as sand, coral, gravel, and even peat soil [30]. Sand substrates dominate throughout the stations located in Karangsong. The characteristics of the substrate play a significant role in limiting the growth and distribution of mangroves. The distinct physical characteristics and soil chemistry contribute to variations in zoning [31]. The presence of fine sand and mud substrates supports the well-developed growth of mangroves in the research site. The sand substrate dominates all sites in Karangsong due to its proximity to the mainland. The high percentage of sand spread throughout the survey site can be attributed to its proximity to the mainland. As a result, the sand is carried away by the river and rainwater streams. The characteristics of substrates play a crucial role in limiting the growth and distribution of mangroves.

4.2. Management Assessment of the Karangsong Mangrove

Planning and managing mangrove ecosystems for tourism requires the involvement of the local government and manager community-based tourism (CBT) of Pantai Lestari. The criteria for mangrove tourism are established based on the existing condition of mangrove ecosystem conditions, including various species, substrates, tourism facilities, and biota inhabiting the ecosystem [32,33,34]. Here, mangrove tourism can be classed as ecotourism because tourists receive education from a person from CBT or the manager and tourists can also read all the information from the information board, so that tourists in addition to enjoying the scenery also receive information on how this mangrove ecosystem can grow and know what fauna can live in the mangrove ecosystem [34,35,36].
Community involvement is essential for the environmentally friendly management of the mangrove ecosystem in ecotourism. The concept of ecotourism itself emphasizes the importance of community engagement in protecting, maintaining, and managing the mangrove ecosystem [37,38]. Local communities in the Karangsong mangrove forest actively engage in wildlife protection and habitat restoration activities. In Karangsong’s mangrove ecotourism, the local community organization called “Pantai Lestari” plays a vital role in its management. Community-based tourism (CBT), such as Pantai Lestari, is considered crucial for achieving sustainable ecotourism [39]. It is widely acknowledged that the community can benefit from long-term sustainable tourism, making the management of CBT beneficial for both the community and ecotourism as a whole [40,41,42,43]. However, it is important to reduce the community’s dependence on direct incentives to ensure the long-term sustainability of the mangrove ecosystem. One approach is to provide micro-credit to develop small-scale businesses related to mangrove or fishery products. This credit can be provided as a reward for successful rehabilitation and management efforts [44].
By planning and maintaining tourism development through CBT, a more sustainable tourism industry can be created, with a focus on community well-being [40] and community empowerment through tourism, including increasing revenue, expanding employment opportunities, improving social justice, preserving cultural identity, and ensuring environmental sustainability [45]. It is worth noting that as awareness of ecotourism increases globally, there is a need to address potential environmental threats associated with ecotourism and ensure the preservation of natural resources for future generations [46]. In the case of Karangsong mangrove tourism, community-based tourism (CBT) plays an important role. Nevertheless, to attract more tourists and foster the societal development of the area, it is necessary to focus on enhancing the conservation efforts and developing robust infrastructure. This approach will help to preserve the mangroves as a cultural and heritage site, ensuring their long-term sustainability and appeal to visitors. By considering all aspects of mangrove ecotourism, Karangsong can become a thriving destination that satisfies visitors while maintaining its environmental integrity.

4.3. Implication of Development Karangsong Mangrove for Ecotourism

The carrying capacity region in the Karangsong mangrove forest is 803 people/day, demonstrating the potential development for ecotourism. The biophysical elements in the Karangsong mangrove ecosystem make it remarkably valuable as a potential ecotourism destination that requires well-maintained efforts. It has been reported that the development of the ecotourism sector, its various stakeholders, and their involvement can greatly enhance the development of the mangrove ecotourism area in Karangsong and the benefits of the tourism industry, particularly ecotourism, in contributing to environmental conservation efforts [47]. These benefits include:
A.
Financial Contributions: Tourism revenue can be directly used by tourism managers for conservation efforts. Funds can be collected from tourists or operators to finance the maintenance or rehabilitation of mangrove, employee salaries, and the establishment of security systems. Indirect taxes from tourist arrivals can also be utilized by the government to support research, conservation programs, and infrastructure development. The taxes generated by tourist sites are managed by the government and distributed to local communities according to governmental regulations.
B.
Planning and Environmental Management: Ecotourism can involve local residents and allow for more flexible economic planning. Planners can work to prevent loss or damage to environmental assets in and around the mangrove ecotourism area of Karangsong.
C.
Raising Awareness and Environmental Protection: Ecotourism has the potential to connect communities with nature and increase environmental awareness. The development of ecotourism activities can significantly contribute to environmental protection efforts at the local level.
D.
Alternative Employment Opportunities: Ecotourism services provide alternative employment opportunities, offering specific types of work. Involving the local community in ecotourism activities is an important aspect of sustainable management. This can help to reduce practices such as mangrove destruction for firewood and other damaging activities resulting from a lack of job options.
E.
Regulation and Institutionalization: Ecotourism services should operate in an organized, procedural, and measurable manner. Clear rules and regulations are necessary to control and limit the activities of tourists, operators, and other stakeholders according to conservation guidelines.
UNESCO and The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) have proposed principles for sustainable ecotourism development. These principles emphasize providing quality experiences and education to visitors, minimizing negative environmental impacts, involving the community in tourism management, providing economic incentives to local communities, and ensuring long-term survival and sustainability [48] (Table 7). There are two standards for dealing with ecotourism: environmental protection and institutional management. Environmental protection includes aspects such as waste management, law enforcement, and improved ecotourism practices [49,50,51]. Institutional management involves operational planning, institutional coordination, capacity building, economic benefits, and community involvement. The principles for tourism attraction development include upholding religious and cultural values, achieving a balance between development and management efforts, and focusing on conservation for sustainability [11]. To achieve sustainable development of mangrove ecotourism in Karangsong, cooperation between communities, academic institutions, and the government is crucial. This collaborative approach can help to ensure the preservation and sustainable use of resources while providing economic benefits and maintaining cultural and environmental sensitivities.

5. Conclusions

The development of sustainable mangrove ecotourism must rely on ecological information. Conversely, ‘Sun and Sea’ tourism often leads to issues like over-tourism and environmental harm due to its mass appeal; ecotourism aims to address these concerns by encouraging off-peak travel, offering diverse activities, and prioritizing environmental conservation. Essentially, ecotourism complements ‘Sun and Sea’ tourism by providing sustainable alternatives that strive to balance economic growth with environmental preservation and social well-being. In the areas studied, ecotourism was properly managed and supported by local communities and governments. As a result, environmental damage can be reduced and the mangrove ecosystem as a tourist destination can be made sustainable. The suitability index for mangrove tourism is 83.7%. There are two standards for dealing with ecotourism. The first point is environmental protection, including material recovery, law enforcement, and improved ecotourism. Second, institutional management, including operational planning, institutional management, capacity and coordination, economic benefits, and community involvement, is important. Carrying capacity assessment could facilitate the measurement of marine ecotourism development. Implementing this approach aims to mitigate the degradation of mangrove forests and sustain restoration efforts. Consequently, it can enhance the natural maritime heritage, creating opportunities in hospitality, recreation, and conservation efforts. Therefore, the benefits both the economy, ecosystem, and the residents of the ecotourism area can be sustained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.J.P.; methodology, D.J.P.; software, G.Z.; validation, D.J.P. and G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, D.J.P., G.Z. and G.M.L.; writing—review and editing, D.J.P., G.Z., G.M.L. and B.P.; visualization, B.P.; supervision, D.J.P., G.Z. and B.P.; project administration, B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Unpad Fundamental Research Grant 2018 to D.J.P.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All links to input data are reported in the manuscript and all output data are available upon request to the authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments that helped to improve the paper. Thank you for Unpad Fundamental Research (RFU) Grant 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Puspitawati, D. Indonesia’s Archipelagic State Status: Current Development. Ind. J. Int. Law 2021, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prihadi, D.J.; Riyantini, I.; Ismail, M.R. Study of biophysical status and resources support marine tourism area of mangrove in Indramayu Karangsong. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 162, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dahuri, R. Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut: Aset Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia; Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghermandi, A.; Nunes, P.A.L.D. A global map of coastal recreation values: Results from a spatially explicit meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spalding, M.; Parrett, C.L. Global patterns in mangrove recreation and tourism. Mar. Policy 2019, 110, 103540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krüger, O. The role of ecotourism in conservation: Panacea or Pandora’s box? Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 579–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kurniawan, F.; Adrianto, L.; Bengen, D.G.; Prasetyo, L.B. Vulnerability assessment of small islands to tourism: The case of the Marine Tourism Park of the Gili Matra Islands, Indonesia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2016, 6, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dwyer, L. Emerging Ocean Industries: Implications for sustainable tourism development. Tour. Mar. Environ. 2018, 13, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdurrahman, B. Destination Management Organization (DMO). Ind. J. Tourism. 2014, 9, 1907–9419. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brandt, J.S.; Buckley, R.C. A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 32, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hengky, S.H. Challenges sustainable coastal tourism on Panjang Island. J. Aquac. Marine Biol. 2019, 8, 180–184. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cinner, J.E.; Daw, T.; Huchery, C.; Thoya, P.; Wamukota, A.; Cedras, M.; Abunge, C. Winners and Losers in Marine Conservation: Fishers’ Displacement and Livelihood Benefits from Marine Reserves. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2014, 27, 994–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chong, V.C.; Sasekumar, A. Coastal habitats (mangroves, coral reefs and seagrass beds) of the ASEAN region: Status, utilization and management issues. Fish. Sci. 2002, 68, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hutomo, M.; Moosa, M.K. Indonesian marine and coastal biodiversity: Present status. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 34, 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giri, C.; Zhu, Z.; Tieszen, L.L.; Singh, A.; Gillette, S.; Kelmelis, J.A. Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics (19752005) of the tsunami-affected region of Asia. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Badan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah. Kabupaten Jawa Barat Dalam Angka 2008 Penyusunan Detail Enginering Design Pusat Mangrove Jawa Barat; Badan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah: Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 2008. (In Indonesia) [Google Scholar]
  17. Rifardi, R. Deposisi Sedimen di Perairan Laut Dangkal. Ilmu Kelautan. Ind. J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 13, 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller, G., Jr. Living in The Environment: Principles, Connection and Solutions; Thomson Learning, Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Taiwo, F.J.; Oluwasola, O.; Feyisara. Relevance to Urban and Regional Planning. Understanding the Concept of Carrying Capacity and Its Relevancy to Urban and Regional Planning. Environ. Sci. Eng. Geogr. 2017, 33, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nikijuluw, V.P.H.; Papilaya, R.L.; Boli, P. Daya Dukung Pariwisata Berkelanjutan Raja Ampat; Penerbit Conservation International: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yulianda, F.; Fahrudin, A.; Hutabarat, A.A.; Harteti, S.; Kusharjani, K.H. Pengelolaan Pesisir dan Laut Secara Terpadu; Pusdiklat Kehutanan-Departemen Kehutanan RI-SECEM-Korea International Coorporation Agency: Bogor, Indonesia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salem, M.E.; Mercer, D.E. The economic value of mangroves: A meta analysis. Sustainability 2012, 4, 359–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kusmana, C. Management of mangrove ecosystem in Indonesia. J. Pengelolaan Sumberd. Alam Dan Lingkung. 2011, 1, 152–157. [Google Scholar]
  24. Onrizal, O.; Kusmana, C. Ecological study on mangrove forest in East Coast of North Sumatra. Biodiversitas 2008, 9, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sukmayeti, E. A Social Mapping of Fishermen Resource and Accessibility for Coastal Tourism Development Policy. Society 2019, 7, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferraro, P.J.; Hanauer, M.M. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4332–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Boley, B.B.; Green, G.T. Ecotourism and natural resource conservation: The ‘potential’for a sustainable symbiotic relationship. J. Ecotourism 2016, 15, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jamal, T.; Higham, J. Justice and ethics: Towards a new platform for tourism and sustainability. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beselly, S.M.; van der Wegen, M.; Grueters, U.; Reyns, J.; Dijkstra, J.; Roelvink, D. Eleven Years of Mangrove–Mudflat Dynamics on the Mud Volcano-Induced Prograding Delta in East Java, Indonesia: Integrating UAV and Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spalding, M.; Kainuma, M.; Collins, L. World Atlas of Mangroves; Taylor and Francis Group: London, UK, 2010; ISBN 978-1-84977-660-8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Murdiyarso, D.; Purbopuspito, J.; Kauffman, J.B.; Warren, M.W.; Sasmito, S.D.; Donato, D.C.; Manuri, S.; Krisnawati, H.; Taberima, S.; Kurnianto, S. The Potential of Indonesian Mangrove Forests for Global Climate Change Mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 1089–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Phong, N.T.; Luom, T.T. Configuration of Allocated Mangrove Areas and Protection of Mangrove-Dominated Muddy Coasts: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nagelkerken, I.S.; Blaber, S.J.M.; Bouillon, S.; Green, P.; Haywood, M.; Kirton, L.G.; Meynecke, J.-O.; Pawlik, J.; Penrose, H.M.; Sasekumar, A.; et al. The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 155–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schmitt, C.; Duke, N.C. Mangrove Management, Assessment, and Monitoring. In Tropical Forestry Handbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mumby, P.J.; Edwards, A.J.; Arias-González, J.E.; Lindeman, K.; Blackwell, P.G.; Gall, A.; Gorczynska, M.I.; Harborne, A.R.; Pescod, C.L.; Renken, H.; et al. Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 427, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Faperi, S.; Hendrarto, I.B.; Radjasa, O.K. Management Strategies of Mangrove Degradation in Coastal Areas of Brebes Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. J. Coast. Zone Manag. 2015, 18, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ferreira, A.C.; Borges, R.; de Lacerda, L.D. Can Sustainable Development Save Mangrove? Sustainability 2022, 14, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karlina, E.; Kusmana, C.; Marimin; Bismark, M. Management of Protected Mangrove Forest Based Benefit Value in Batu Ampar District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 2016, 27, 76–87. [Google Scholar]
  39. Prayudha, E.D.; Sulardiono, B.; Hendrarto, B. Strategi Kelompok Pantai Lestari Dalam Pengembangan Kegiatan Rehabilitasi Mangrove Di Desa Karangsong Kabupaten Indramayu. J. Man. Aqu. Res. 2014, 3, 80–87. [Google Scholar]
  40. Boley, B.B.; McGehee, N.G.; Perdue, R.R.; Long, P. Empowerment and resident attitudes toward tourism: Strengthening the theoretical foundation through a Weberian lens. Annals. Tour. Res. 2014, 49, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Jaafar, M.; Kock, N.; Ahmad, A.G. The effect of community factors on residents’ perceptions toward World Heritage Site inscription and sustainable tourism development. J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 25, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hsu, C.Y.; Chen, M.Y.; Yang, S.C. Residents’ attitude toward support for island sustainable tourism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuscer, M. Perspective of tourism impacts and cooperation–The case of Ljubljana. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. VanEijk, P.; Kumar, R. Bio-Rights in Theory and practice. A Financing Mechanism for Linking Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Conservation; Wetlands International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Academic Paper of the Draft Regional Regulation of Indramayu Regency Concerning the Protection and Empowerment of Salt Farmers in 2021; Indramayu Regency Government: Indramayu, Indonesia, 2021; p. 4.
  46. Richards, D.R.; Friess, D.A. Rates and Drivers of Mangrove Deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nugroho, I. Ekowisata dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan; Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ehlers, P. Blue growth and ocean governance—How to balance the use and the protection of the seas. WMU J. Mar. Aff. 2016, 15, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bimrah, K.; Dasgupta, R.; Hashimoto, S.; Saizen, I.; Dhyani, S. Ecosystem services of mangroves: A systematic review and synthesis of contemporary scientific literature. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. UNEP. The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action; UNEP: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  51. Damastuti, E.; de Groot, R. Effectiveness of Community-Based Mangrove Management for Sustainable Resource Use and Livelihood Support: A Case Study of Four Villages in Central Java, Indonesia. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pratiwi, M.W.; Muhsoni, F.F. Analysis of the suitability of mangrove ecotourism in Taddan Village, Camplong District, Sampang Regency. Samakia: J. Fish. Sci. 2021, 12, 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sadik, M.; Muhiddin, A.H.; Ukkas, M. Mangrove ecotourism suitability in terms of biogeophysical aspects of the Gonda beach area in Laliko Village, Campalagian District, Polewali Mandar Regency. SPERMONDE J. Mar. Sci. 2017, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tambunan, R.A.; Rumengan, A.P.; Paruntu, C.P.; Rampengan, R.M.; Ompi, M.; Rompas, R.M. The Suitability Index of Mangrove Tourism in the Coastal Area around Budo Village, Wori Sub-District, North Minahasa Regency for Marine Ecotourism. PLATAX Sci. J. 2023, 11, 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tahir, I.; Effendi, R.; Akbar, N. Analysis of mangrove forest ecotourism suitability in jailolo bay area, west halmahera district. Proc. Nat. Sem. Mar. S. I. Res. 2016, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  56. Abtahee, M.; Islam, A.A.; Haque, M.N.; Zonaed, H.; Ritu, S.M.; Islam, S.M.I.; Zaman, A. Mapping Ecotourism Potential in Bangladesh: The Integration of an Analytical Hierarchy Algorithm and Geospatial Data. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vargas-del-Rio, D.; Brenner, L. Mangroves in Transition. Management of Community Spaces Influenced by Conservation and Tourism in Mexico. Management of Community Spaces Influenced by Conservation and Tourism in Mexico. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2023, 232, 106439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Salpage, N.D.; Aanesen, M.; Armstrong, C.W. Willingness to Pay for Mangrove Restoration to Reduce the Climate Change Impacts on Ecotourism in Rekawa Coastal Wetland, Sri Lanka; Routledge: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  59. Vo, T.Q.; Kuenzer, C.; Oppelt, N. How remote sensing supports mangrove ecossytem service valuation: A Case study in Ca Mau province, Vietnam. Eco. Serv. 2015, 14, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  60. Inoue, T.; Kohzu, A.; Akaji, Y.; Miura, S.; Baba, S.; Oshiro, N.; Kezuka, M.; Kainuma, M.; Tokuoka, H.; Naruse, T. Mangroves of Japan. In Mangroves: Biodiversity, Livelihoods and Conservation; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hamimah, T.; Huda, N.N.; Kamlun, K.U.; Rosmalina, A.R.; Jennifer, C.K.L. Sustainability assessment of mangrove forest as a tourist destination: A case study using GSTC Criteria in Kota Belud, Sabah, Malaysia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1053, 012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research stations map of mangrove ecotourism, Karangsong.
Figure 1. Research stations map of mangrove ecotourism, Karangsong.
Sustainability 16 02806 g001
Figure 2. The design of sampling ecosystem. (A) Plot for seedling observation (1 m × 1 m = 1 m2), (B) Plot for stake observation (5 m × 5 m = 25 m2), (C) Tree observation plot (10 m × 10 m = 100 m2).
Figure 2. The design of sampling ecosystem. (A) Plot for seedling observation (1 m × 1 m = 1 m2), (B) Plot for stake observation (5 m × 5 m = 25 m2), (C) Tree observation plot (10 m × 10 m = 100 m2).
Sustainability 16 02806 g002
Figure 3. Composition of mangrove species in the Karangsong mangrove forest.
Figure 3. Composition of mangrove species in the Karangsong mangrove forest.
Sustainability 16 02806 g003
Table 1. The measurement of mangrove density in the Karangsong mangrove forest. Asterisk (*) symbol represents the largest density area.
Table 1. The measurement of mangrove density in the Karangsong mangrove forest. Asterisk (*) symbol represents the largest density area.
StationsDensity (Tree/Ha)Major Mangrove Species
11060Avicennia sp.
2390
3580
4640
51200 *
61080
7880
8940
Table 2. The measurement of water quality and substrate characteristics.
Table 2. The measurement of water quality and substrate characteristics.
CriteriaStation
IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIII
Temperature (°C)3128.530.53030293030
Salinity (‰)2927282829282828
DO (mg/L)6.45.25.75.35.45.55.35.3
pH (unit)7.57.47.337.57.47.57.47.4
Type of SubstrateMuddySandSandSandSandSandSandSand
Table 3. Result of substrates found in the Karangsong mangrove forest.
Table 3. Result of substrates found in the Karangsong mangrove forest.
StationTextures
Gravel (%)Sand (%)Muddy (%)Class of Textures
I0.174.325.6Mud sand
II082.917.1Sand
III0964Sand
IV093.66.4Sand
V0964Sand
VI093.56.5Sand
VII0955Sand
VIII0955Sand
Table 4. The biota association in the Karangsong mangrove ecosystem.
Table 4. The biota association in the Karangsong mangrove ecosystem.
No.OrganismsType of Biota
1FishGelodok fish (Periopthalamus sp.); Mullet fish (Mugil dosumieri)
2CrustaceanMangrove crab (Scylla serrata); Violin crab (Uca sp.)
3MolluscConus shell (Conus sp.); Cassidula aurisfelis; Cerithidea cingulate; Cerithidea Pomacea; Telescopium sp.; Mangrove shell (Polymesoda bengalensis)
4ReptileMonitor lizard (Varanus salvator); Mangrove snake (Chryosopolea sp.); Lizard (Emoia crotostata)
5BirdWhite Heron (Bubulcus ibis kuntul); Blekok (Ardeola speciose); Curek (Calidris ruficollis); Kuntul (Egretta intermeding)
Table 5. The result of suitability matrix for mangrove ecosystem. Maximum suitability value = 98. S1 = Very suitable, with a value 80–100%; S2 = Suitable, with a value 60–80%; S3 = Conditional fit, with a value 35–60%; N = Not suitable, with a value < 35%; Ni = Criteria values to − i (Weight × Score); Nmaks = maximum value from the mangrove tourism category (98).
Table 5. The result of suitability matrix for mangrove ecosystem. Maximum suitability value = 98. S1 = Very suitable, with a value 80–100%; S2 = Suitable, with a value 60–80%; S3 = Conditional fit, with a value 35–60%; N = Not suitable, with a value < 35%; Ni = Criteria values to − i (Weight × Score); Nmaks = maximum value from the mangrove tourism category (98).
NoCriteriaWeightsScore 4Score 3Score 2Score 1
1Density (ind/100 m2)3>15–25/100 m2>10–15/100 m25–10/100 m2<5/100 m2
2Mangrove species5>53–51–20
3Thickness of Mangrove (m)3>500 m>200–500 m50–200 m<50 m
4Associated Biota54321
5Length of River (km)1>3 km3 km2 km1 km
6Width of River (km)1>500 m201–500 m4–200 m<4 m
7Depth of River (m)3>3–5 m>2–3 m1–2 m<1m
8Substrate1Rugged, medium and fine sandRugged, and medium sandFine sandCommon sand
9Tourist Facility3Toilet, restaurant, assesories shop,
meeting point,
resting point/praying room
Toilet,
restaurant,
meeting point,
resting point/praying room
Toilet, restaurant, meeting pointToilet, meeting point
10Tourism Attributes2Information board, map of location, sign direction, lightingInformation board, map of location, sign directionInformation board, map of locationInformation board
Table 6. Score of suitability area matrix of the Karangsong mangrove ecosystem.
Table 6. Score of suitability area matrix of the Karangsong mangrove ecosystem.
NoCriteria WeightResultScoreWeight × Score
1Density (ind/100 m2)38.2539
2Mangrove species53 species315
3Thickness of Mangrove (m)3>500 m412
4Associated Biota55 species biota (fish, Crustacea, Moluska, reptile, bird)420
5Substrate1Coarse, medium, and fine sand44
6Length of River (km)12 km22
7Width of River (km)14–200 m22
8Depth of River (m)3>2–3 m39
9Tourist Facility3Toilet, meeting point13
10Tourist Attributes2Information board, map of location, sign directions,36
Total = 82
IKW = Σ(Ni/Nmaks) × 100% = 83.7%
Table 7. Summary of marine ecotourism development assessed through CBT and biophysical assessment in the world.
Table 7. Summary of marine ecotourism development assessed through CBT and biophysical assessment in the world.
No.Mangrove EcotourismCBT and Biophysical Assesment AcitivitiesLocationSource
1Mangrove Ecotourism Suitability in Sampang
  • The mangrove area has a high tourism suitability index
  • This area exhibits promising potential for transformation into a marine ecotourism destination
Taddan Village, Camplong Subdistrict, Sampang Regency, Indonesia[52]
2Mangrove Ecotourism Suitability in view of Biogeophysical Aspect
  • The mangrove ecosystem area demonstrates significant potential for ecotourism development, as indicated by the results of tourism suitability analysis
  • Gonda Beach is classified as highly suitable for mangrove ecotourism, supported by its diverse range of mangrove species and biota, including Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Rhizophora stylosa, Rhizophora apiculata, Ceriops tagal, Sonneratia alba, Avicennia alba, Avicennia marina, Xylocarpus granatum, and Xylocarpus moluccensis, as well as various fish, reptiles, birds, and crabs
Laliko Village, Campalagian District, Polewali Mandar Regency, Indonesia[53]
3The Suitability Index of Mangrove Tourism in the Coastal Area around Budo Village
  • Six mangrove species identified: Rhizophora mucronata, Rhizophora apiculata, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Sonneratia alba, Avicennia marina, and Nypa fruticans with density ranging from 6.2 ind/100 m2 to 11.8 ind/100 m2
  • Mangrove-associated biota include fish, shrimp, crabs, mollusks, birds, and reptiles
  • Average tourism suitability index recorded at 54.6%, categorized as “conditionally suitable”
  • Carrying capacity of Budo Village mangrove tourism area: 116 people/day, operational for 14 h/day
Budo Village, Wori Subdistrict, North Minahasa Regency in North Sulawesi, Indonesia.[54]
4Mangrove Forest Ecotourism Suitability in Jailolo Bay Area
  • Average tourism suitability index (IKW) determined at 63.5%, categorized as “suitable”
  • Carrying capacity of mangrove tourism areas in Jailolo Bay: 150 people/day, operational for 12 h/day
  • Factors influencing mangrove ecotourism suitability in Jailolo Bay: mangrove thickness, type, density, and associated biota
Jailolo Bay area, West Halmahera Regency, Indonesia.[55]
5Mapping Ecotourism Potential in Bangladesh
  • Various areas in Bangladesh, including Cox’s Bazar, Chittagong, Rangamati, Khagrachhari, and the mangrove region are identified as highly suitable for ecotourism development
  • Challenges such as the scarcity of limited clean water in coastal areas of Bangladesh and the necessity for integrating safety and security concerns with the mapping of future ecotourism potential have been recognized
Bangladesh[56]
6Management of Community Spaces Influenced by Mangrove Conservation and Tourism in Mexico
  • Integrating management, conservation, and tourism aspects offers multiple benefits for both the mangrove environment and local communities
  • A balanced approach fosters conservation awareness and simultaneously creates economic opportunities within the tourism sector
Mexico[57]
7Mangrove Restoration to Reduce the Climate Change Impacts on Ecotourism
  • Majority of individuals in the Rekawa Coastal Wetlands express willingness to contribute financially to mangrove restoration programs
  • Factors such as awareness of climate change impacts, recognition of ecotourism benefits, and dependence on mangrove ecosystems influence the extent of willingness to pay
  • This suggests that implementing mangrove restoration programs can be facilitated with financial backing from the local community
Rekawa, Sri Lanka[58]
8Remote Sensing Supports Mangrove Ecosystem Service Valuation in Ca Mau Province, Vietnam
  • Economic benefits from mangrove ecosystem services in Ca Mau province, Vietnam, including fisheries, erosion control, carbon sequestration, and timber, total USD 622 million
  • These benefits are derived from an area coverage of 187 hectares
  • Proper management of these resources while maintaining environmental balance can significantly improve the quality of life for the local population
Ca Mau Province, Vietnam[59]
9Mangroves of Japan
  • The total area of mangroves in Japan is 870 ha, less than 0.01% of the country’s total forest area, yet they are protected and are increasing in size and importance for tourism
  • Mangroves in Japan have significant species diversity, including Rhizophora, Kandelia, and Bruguiera
  • The conservation status of mangrove forests in Japan varies, with some areas facing threats from coastal development and climate change
  • The ecological roles of mangrove forests in Japan include coastal protection, carbon sequestration, and habitat for various species
Japan[60]
10Sustainability Assessment of Mangrove Forest as a Tourist Destination using GSTC Criteria
  • Mangrove conservation efforts in the study area are ongoing, with a focus on sustainable management and economic benefits
  • Sustainable management and economic benefits exhibit the majority of indicators for sustainability within the conservation efforts
  • Despite progress, certain conservation efforts may require formalization to enhance effectiveness
  • Recommendations have been proposed based on identified gaps, aligning with the GSTC guidelines
Kota Belud, Sabah, Malaysia[61]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prihadi, D.J.; Zhang, G.; Lahbar, G.M.; Pasaribu, B. Integration of Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Index and Biophysical Assessment for Sustainable Ecotourism Mangrove: A Case Study of Karangsong, Indonesia. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072806

AMA Style

Prihadi DJ, Zhang G, Lahbar GM, Pasaribu B. Integration of Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Index and Biophysical Assessment for Sustainable Ecotourism Mangrove: A Case Study of Karangsong, Indonesia. Sustainability. 2024; 16(7):2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prihadi, Donny Juliandri, Guanghai Zhang, Ghulam M. Lahbar, and Buntora Pasaribu. 2024. "Integration of Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Index and Biophysical Assessment for Sustainable Ecotourism Mangrove: A Case Study of Karangsong, Indonesia" Sustainability 16, no. 7: 2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop