How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses
2.1. Pro-Environmental Behaviours as Mediator of the Minimalism and Green Purchase Intention Relationship
2.2. Pro-Environmental Behaviours as Mediator of Collectivist Culture and Green Purchase Intention
2.3. Pro-Environmental Behaviours as Mediator of Environmental Concern and Green Purchase Intention
3. Method
3.1. Research Scheme
3.2. Sample and Data Collection
3.3. Scale Operationalisation and Questionnaire Design
4. Results
4.1. Demographics Scale
4.2. Structural Model Assessment and Direct Effects Examination
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Managerial Implications
6. Limitations and Further Research
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kaida, N.; Kaida, K. Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2016, 18, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Shi, S. Analysis of the mediating role of social network embeddedness on low-carbon household behaviour: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 858–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi, L.; Qiao, L.; Xu, T.; Gan, X.; Yang, H.; Zhao, J.; Qiao, Y.; Hou, J. Promoting sustainable development: The impact of differences in cultural values on residents’ pro-environmental behaviors. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1539–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, P.C.; Dietz, T.; Abel, T.D.; Guagnano, G.A.; Kalof, L. A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 1999, 6, 81–97. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, P.C. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, J.I.M.; Steg, L.; Dicke, M. Morality and reducing car use: Testing the norm activation model of prosocial behavior. Transp. Res. Trends 2007, 2, 12–32. [Google Scholar]
- Klöckner, C.A. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.-T.; Zhu, D.; Liu, C.; Kim, P.B. A meta-analysis of antecedents of pro-environmental behavioral intention of tourists and hospitality consumers. Tour. Manag. 2022, 93, 104566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, A. Determinants of the Consumers Green Purchase Intention in Developing Countries. J. Manag. Sci. 2017, 4, 217–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Canio, F.; Martinelli, E.; Endrighi, E. Enhancing consumers’ pro-environmental purchase intentions: The moderating role of environmental concern. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 1312–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfandiar, K.; Pearce, J.; Dowling, R.; Goh, E. Pro-environmental behaviours in protected areas: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 41, 100943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druică, E.; Ianole-Călin, R.; Puiu, A.-I. When Less Is More: Understanding the Adoption of a Minimalist Lifestyle Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Mathematics 2023, 11, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Martinez, C.M.J.; Johnson, C. Minimalism as a sustainable lifestyle: Its behavioral representations and contributions to emotional well-being. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matte, J.; Fachinelli, A.C.; De Toni, D.; Milan, G.S.; Olea, P.M. Relationship between minimalism, happiness, life satisfaction, and experiential consumption. SN Soc. Sci. 2021, 1, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pangarkar, A.; Shukla, P.; Taylor, C.R. Minimalism in consumption: A typology and brand engagement strategies. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 127, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.B.; Chai, L.T. Attitude towards the Environment and Green Products: Consumers’ Perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, S.; Ang, T.; Jancenelle, V.E. Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 45, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newton, J.D.; Tsarenko, Y.; Ferraro, C.; Sands, S. Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1974–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, P.; Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, N.; Kim, S.H. Electric vehicle resistance from Korean and American millennials: Environmental concerns and perception. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 109, 103387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreen, N.; Purbey, S.; Sadarangani, P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, R.Y.K. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychol. Mark. 2001, 18, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaremohzzabieh, Z.; Ismail, N.; Ahrari, S.; Abu Samah, A. The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 732–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.K. A Comparative Study of Green Purchase Intention between Korean and Chinese Consumers: The Moderating Role of Collectivism. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimah, A.; Khalil, S.; Cheng, J.M.; Tran, M.D.; Panwar, V. Understanding green purchase behavior through death anxiety and individual social responsibility: Mastery as a moderator. J. Consum. Behav. 2018, 17, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, S.; Tarun, T. Effect of consumption values on customers’ green purchase intention: A mediating role of green trust. Soc. Responsib. J. 2020, 17, 1320–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbarossa, C.; De Pelsmacker, P. Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 2016, 134, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, M.M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers? green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007, 31, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, M.M. A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24, 445–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casaló, L.V.; Escario, J.-J.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, C. Analyzing differences between different types of pro-environmental behaviors: Do attitude intensity and type of knowledge matter? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, F.; Dewitte, S. Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019, 63, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, L.R.; Stedman, R.C.; Cooper, C.B.; Decker, D.J. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 43, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009, 29, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irawan; Elia, A.; Benius. Interactive effects of citizen trust and cultural values on pro-environmental behaviors: A time-lag study from Indonesia. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronrod, A.; Tchetchik, A.; Grinstein, A.; Turgeman, L.; Blass, V. Promoting new pro-environmental behaviors: The effect of combining encouraging and discouraging messages. J. Environ. Psychol. 2023, 86, 101945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Jia, F. Intergenerational transmission of environmental knowledge and pro-environmental behavior: A dyadic relationship. J. Environ. Psychol. 2023, 89, 102058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Composto, J.W.; Constantino, S.M.; Weber, E.U. Predictors and consequences of pro-environmental behavior at work. Curr. Res. Ecol. Soc. Psychol. 2023, 4, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bülbül, H.; Topal, A.; Özoğlu, B.; Büyükkeklik, A. Assessment of determinants for households’ pro-environmental behaviours and direct emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 415, 137892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, A.V.; Bellezza, S. Consumer Minimalism. J. Consum. Res. 2022, 48, 796–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, F.; Ishaq, M.I. Impact of minimalist practices on consumer happiness and financial well-being. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 73, 103333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Liu, J. When less is more: Understanding consumers’ responses to minimalist appeals. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 40, 2151–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kropfeld, M.I.; Nepomuceno, M.V.; Dantas, D.C. The Ecological Impact of Anticonsumption Lifestyles and Environmental Concern. J. Public Policy Mark. 2018, 37, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasser, T. Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 375, 20160369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuanr, A.; Pradhan, D.; Chaudhuri, H.R. I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: Investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legere, A.; Kang, J. The role of self-concept in shaping sustainable consumption: A model of slow fashion. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagiliūtė, R. Environmental Information: Different Sources Different Levels of Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Sustainability 2023, 15, 14773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Yang, D.; Meng, F.; Huang, Y. Environmental Regulations, Green Marketing, and Consumers’ Green Product Purchasing Intention: Evidence from China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraj, E.; Martinez, E. Ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007, 31, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benvenuti, L.; De Santis, A.; Santesarti, F.; Tocca, L. An optimal plan for food consumption with minimal environmental impact: The case of school lunch menus. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 129, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arısal, I.; Atalar, T. The Exploring Relationships between Environmental Concern, Collectivism and Ecological Purchase Intention. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 235, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segev, S. Modelling household conservation behaviour among ethnic consumers: The path from values to behaviours. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 39, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, G.; Xie, F.; Gong, S.; Pan, H. The role of cultural values in green purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from Chinese consumers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019, 43, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y. Understanding Green Purchase: The Influence of Collectivism, Personal Values and Environmental Attitudes, and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Seoul J. Bus. 2011, 17, 65–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-T. Consumer characteristics and social influence factors on green purchasing intentions. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2014, 32, 738–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, A.N.H.; Tran, M.D.; Nguyen, D.P.; Cheng, J.M.S. Heterogeneity in a dual personal values–dual purchase consequences–green consumption commitment framework. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2019, 31, 480–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, Y.-N.; Thyroff, A.; Rapert, M.I.; Park, S.-Y.; Lee, H.J. To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, M.; Yadav, P.S. Understanding the role of individual concerns, attitude, and perceived value in green apparel purchase intention; the mediating effect of consumer involvement and moderating role of generation Z&Y. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2023, 9, 100120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sova, A.; Rožman, M.; Vide, R.K. Exploring Differences in Green Innovation among Countries with Individualistic and Collectivist Cultural Orientations. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, W.; Gul, S.; Lee, Y. The Influence of Individual Cultural Value Differences on Pro-Environmental Behavior among International Students at Korean Universities. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varshneya, G.; Pandey, S.K.; Das, G. Impact of Social Influence and Green Consumption Values on Purchase Intention of Organic Clothing: A Study on Collectivist Developing Economy. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2017, 18, 478–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Lobo, A.; Greenland, S. The influence of cultural values on green purchase behaviour. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2017, 35, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Xie, C.; Morrison, A.M.; Zhang, K. Fostering Resident Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Roles of Destination Image and Confucian Culture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Ding, B.; Eilks, I. A Case on a Lesson Plan about Take-out Plastics Use Addressing Confucianism for Sustainability-Oriented Secondary Chemistry Education in Mainland China. J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 101, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz, S.M. The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 2017, 53, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe, P.D.; Mildenberger, M.; Marlon, J.R.; Leiserowitz, A. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrow, K.; Grolleau, G.; Ibanez, L. Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 140, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longhofer, W.; Negro, G.; Roberts, P.W. The Changing Effectiveness of Local Civic Action: The Critical Nexus of Community and Organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 2019, 64, 203–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmer, M.R.; Stafford, T.F.; Stafford, M.R. Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern. J. Bus. Res. 1994, 30, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzubaidi, H.; Slade, E.L.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Examining antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 122, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M.; Kilbourne, W.; Vocino, A. Relationship between the dominant social paradigm, materialism and environmental behaviours in four Asian economies. Eur. J. Mark. 2014, 48, 522–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maduku, D.K. How environmental concerns influence consumers’ anticipated emotions towards sustainable consumption: The moderating role of regulatory focus. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 76, 103593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhead, R.; Elliot, M.; Upham, P. Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 43, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmas, M.A.; Lessem, N. Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2014, 67, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont, O. Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 50, 135–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosic, A.; Passafaro, P.; Molinari, M. Predicting Pro-Environmental Behaviours in the Public Sphere: Comparing the Influence of Social Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Global Warming Awareness and the NEP. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, S. Environmental Knowledge and Green Purchase Intention and Behavior in China: The Mediating Role of Moral Obligation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, K.-P.; Chan, H.-W. Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Glob. Environ. Change 2018, 48, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balderjahn, I. Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. J. Bus. Res. 1988, 17, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, J.A.; Bacon, D.R. Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. J. Bus. Res. 1997, 40, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamane, T. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed.; Harper and Rowed: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Babin, B.J.; Krey, N. Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and Recommendations. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 163–177, Correction in J. Advert. 2017, 46, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J.C. An overview of psychological measurement. In Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: A Handbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1978; pp. 97–146. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Black, B.; Babin, B.J.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hock, M.; Ringle, C.M. Strategic networks in the software industry: An empirical analysis of the value continuum. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. Stud. 2010, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research; Marcoulides, G.A., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 295–336. [Google Scholar]
- Lachenbruch, P.A.; Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1989, 84, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Tang, L.; Lyu, Y. Impact of minimalism on consumers’ low-carbon innovation behavior: Interactive role of quantitative behavior. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2023, 21, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 196 | 50.9 |
Female | 189 | 49.1 |
Total | 385 | 100 |
Education Background | ||
Junior high or below | 80 | 20.8 |
Senior high | 106 | 27.5 |
Undergraduate | 142 | 36.9 |
Graduate and above | 57 | 14.8 |
Total | 385 | 100 |
Age | ||
20–29 | 34 | 8.8 |
30–39 | 183 | 47.5 |
40–49 | 137 | 35.6 |
50 | 31 | 8.1 |
Total | 385 | 100 |
Monthly income (Million VNĐ) | ||
10 | 34 | 8.8 |
10–20 | 152 | 39.5 |
20–30 | 104 | 27 |
30 | 95 | 24.7 |
Total | 100 | 385 |
Collectivist Culture | Green Purchase Intention | Minimalism | PEBs (Public) | PEBs (Private) | Environmental Concern | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1 | 0.806 | |||||
CC2 | 0.891 | |||||
CC3 | 0.810 | |||||
CC4 | 0.832 | |||||
CC5 | 0.842 | |||||
GP1 | 0.902 | |||||
GP2 | 0.929 | |||||
GP3 | 0.965 | |||||
MN1 | 0.810 | |||||
MN2 | 0.837 | |||||
MN3 | 0.831 | |||||
MN4 | 0.886 | |||||
MN5 | 0.786 | |||||
MN6 | 0.749 | |||||
PB1 | 0.860 | |||||
PB2 | 0.931 | |||||
PB3 | 0.947 | |||||
PB4 | 0.834 | |||||
PB5 | 0.742 | |||||
PP1 | 0.894 | |||||
PP2 | 0.830 | |||||
PP3 | 0.844 | |||||
PP4 | 0.844 | |||||
RE1 | 0.924 | |||||
RE2 | 0.917 | |||||
RE3 | 0.921 |
Cronbach’s Alpha | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
---|---|---|
Collectivist Culture | 0.893 | 0.700 |
Environmental Concern | 0.910 | 0.847 |
Green Purchase Intention | 0.924 | 0.869 |
Minimalism | 0.900 | 0.668 |
PEB (Private) | 0.875 | 0.728 |
PEB (Public) | 0.915 | 0.750 |
Collectivist Culture | Environmental Concern | Green Purchase Intention | Minimalism | PEB (Private) | PEB (Public) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collectivist Culture | ||||||
Environmental Concern | 0.510 | |||||
Green Purchase Intention | 0.530 | 0.636 | ||||
Minimalism | 0.259 | 0.421 | 0.403 | |||
PEB (Private) | 0.663 | 0.699 | 0.803 | 0.484 | ||
PEB (Public) | 0.492 | 0.643 | 0.616 | 0.516 | 0.708 |
Collectivist Culture | Environmental Concern | Green Purchase Intention | Minimalism | PEB (Private) | PEB (Public) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collectivist Culture | 0.837 | |||||
Environmental Concern | 0.464 | 0.920 | ||||
Green Purchase Intention | 0.484 | 0.585 | 0.932 | |||
Minimalism | 0.236 | 0.386 | 0.369 | 0.818 | ||
PEB (Private) | 0.587 | 0.627 | 0.725 | 0.435 | 0.853 | |
PEB (Public) | 0.451 | 0.592 | 0.572 | 0.467 | 0.639 | 0.866 |
R-Square | R-Square Adjusted | |
---|---|---|
Green Purchase Intention | 0.545 | 0.543 |
Pro-Environmental Behaviors (Private) | 0.540 | 0.537 |
Pro-Environmental Behaviors (Public) | 0.450 | 0.446 |
Collectivist Culture | Environmental Concern | Green Purchase Intention | Minimalism | PEB (Private) | PEB (Public) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collectivist Culture | 0.224 | 0.060 | ||||
Environmental Concern | 0.222 | 0.198 | ||||
Green Purchase Intention | ||||||
Minimalism | 0.076 | 0.110 | ||||
PEB (Private) | 0.479 | |||||
PEB (Public) | 0.044 |
Original Sample (O) | Sample Mean (M) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | p Values | Hypothesis Testing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collectivist Culture -> PEB (Private) | 0.363 | 0.363 | 0.048 | 7.593 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Collectivist Culture -> PEB (Public) | 0.205 | 0.206 | 0.047 | 4.330 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Environmental Concern -> PEB (Private) | 0.381 | 0.378 | 0.045 | 8.506 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Environmental Concern -> PEB (Public) | 0.393 | 0.391 | 0.044 | 8.945 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Minimalism -> PEB (Private) | 0.203 | 0.203 | 0.036 | 5.590 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Minimalism -> PEB (Public) | 0.267 | 0.267 | 0.038 | 7.099 | 0.000 | Accepted |
PEB (Private) -> Green Purchase Intention | 0.607 | 0.606 | 0.050 | 12.215 | 0.000 | Accepted |
PEB (Public) -> Green Purchase Intention | 0.185 | 0.184 | 0.056 | 3.309 | 0.001 | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nguyen, K.H.; Tran, M.D. How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures. Sustainability 2025, 17, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010332
Nguyen KH, Tran MD. How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures. Sustainability. 2025; 17(1):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010332
Chicago/Turabian StyleNguyen, Khanh Huy, and Mai Dong Tran. 2025. "How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures" Sustainability 17, no. 1: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010332
APA StyleNguyen, K. H., & Tran, M. D. (2025). How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures. Sustainability, 17(1), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010332