Next Article in Journal
Digital Economy, R&D Resource Allocation, and Convergence of Regional Green Economy Efficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Oil Palm Bagasse as a Treatment for Soils Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability of Key Proteins in Plant-Based Meat Analogs Production: A Worldwide Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evolution Trends and Future Prospects in Artificial Marine Reef Research: A 28-Year Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of Altitude and Climatic Factors on the Floristic Composition of the Moorlands of the Guamote Canton, Ecuador: Key Revelations for Conservation

Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020383
by Diego Francisco Cushquicullma-Colcha 1,*, Guicela Margoth Ati-Cutiupala 2, Edmundo Danilo Guilcapi-Pacheco 3, Juan Federico Villacis-Uvidia 4, Marcela Yolanda Brito-Mancero 3, Pedro Vicente Vaca-Cárdenas 5, Martha Marisol Vasco-Lucio 5, Eduardo Antonio Muñoz-Jácome 5 and Maritza Lucia Vaca-Cárdenas 6
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020383
Submission received: 14 November 2024 / Revised: 9 December 2024 / Accepted: 20 December 2024 / Published: 7 January 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Plant family names are written in capital letters.
Plant genus names should be in italics (Poa)
In the abstract, the word 'change' is repeated twice
I didn't understand why the family Gentianaceae is described (paragraphs 195-201) and neither the purpose of the phrases about the family Solanaceae in paragraphs 169-173. If one speaks of spontaneous flora why is it necessary to remember tomatoes and potatoes?
Why didn't the authors make floristic surveys and used "virtual repository"? The data would have been more interesting if actual information collected in the field by the authors was used.
Perhaps it would have been more interesting to make a floristic inventory and climatic data at different times of the year and for several years to observe the species dynamics and implicitly the dynamics of the percentage participation of plant families according to the climatic data of several years.
In conclusion, the study would have been even more interesting if it had been carried out over a longer period of time and if it had used floristic surveys physically determined by the authors.

Author Response

Comments 1: Plant family names are written in capital letters.

Plant genus names should be in italics (Poa)

In the abstract, the word 'change' is repeated twice

Response 1: Thank you for pointing this out. We agree with this comment. Therefore, we have corrected the family names and placed the genera in italics, also the word change was deleted so that it is not repeated in the summary.

 

Comments 2: I didn't understand why the family Gentianaceae is described (paragraphs 195-201) and neither the purpose of the phrases about the family Solanaceae in paragraphs 169-173. If one speaks of spontaneous flora why is it necessary to remember tomatoes and potatoes?

Response 2: Agreed. Accordingly, we have synthesized the results with relevant information, from line 169 to 201.

 

Comments 3: Why didn't the authors make floristic surveys and used "virtual repository"? The data would have been more interesting if actual information collected in the field by the authors was used.

Perhaps it would have been more interesting to make a floristic inventory and climatic data at different times of the year and for several years to observe the species dynamics and implicitly the dynamics of the percentage participation of plant families according to the climatic data of several years.

In conclusion, the study would have been even more interesting if it had been carried out over a longer period of time and if it had used floristic surveys physically determined by the authors

Response 3: Thank you for pointing this out. We agree with observations with this comment. Therefore, I would like to mention that the research, in addition to compiling information from databases of floristic species from multiple sources, collected field data through 18 floristic inventories during three years in the study area, within the framework of the research project “Determination of the efficient use of biopurifying high Andean plant species” executed by several institutions.

 We thank you for your comments and clarify that the research continues and in this sense we welcome your suggestions for the writing of the next article.

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors. 

This research is highly engaging and presents significant potential. However, we would like to offer some recommendations to enhance your research and ensure that your article meets the highest standards for publication.

1. Enhancing the Materials and Methods section to provide greater clarity and robustness is recommended.

2. The research design, questions, hypotheses, and methods are unclear. Therefore, formulating a research question and hypothesis is also advised to define the problem and guide the study.

3. Including a methodological diagram and an explanation of the research phases and stages would significantly improve the introduction to this section, facilitating a better understanding of the applied methodology.

4. Additionally, it is recommended that the Results section be separated from the Discussion section. These are distinct stages of an academic article, each serving a specific purpose and contributing uniquely to the overall argument.

All the best,

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The authors are encouraged to enhance the quality of the English language in this manuscript to improve clarity and readability.

Author Response

Comments 1: Enhancing the Materials and Methods section to provide greater clarity and robustness is recommended.

 

Response 1: Agreed. Accordingly, we have improved the structure of the materials and methods section.

 

Comments 2: The research design, questions, hypotheses, and methods are unclear. Therefore, formulating a research question and hypothesis is also advised to define the problem and guide the study.

Response 2: A Thank you for pointing this out. We agree with this comment. We have included the research question and hypothesis in the manuscript.

 

Comments 3: Including a methodological diagram and an explanation of the research phases and stages would significantly improve the introduction to this section, facilitating a better understanding of the applied methodology.

Response 3: Accordingly, we have included a methodological diagram for better understanding.

 

Comments 4: Additionally, it is recommended that the Results section be separated from the Discussion section. These are distinct stages of an academic article, each serving a specific purpose and contributing uniquely to the overall argument.

 

Response 4: Thank you for pointing this out, we have separated the results section and the discussion of the manuscript.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

This manuscript examines the influence of climatic variables and altitude on the floristic composition of the moorlands in Ecuador. While the idea is not entirely novel, the research provides several new insights into this topic. I recommend acceptance with minor revisions.

Specific comments: 

Lines 167-168: Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Amaranthaceae, Solanaceae, Poaceae, Verbenaceae

Line 179 and throughout the text, plant family names should be consistently capitalized throughout the text.

 Lines 157-206: I believe some information on biochemical compounds, morphology, and phylogeny of plant families is unnecessary for this type of research. Please make it shorter and more concise.

Author Response

Comments 1: Lines 167-168: Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Amaranthaceae, Solanaceae, Poaceae, Verbenaceae

Line 179 and throughout the text, plant family names should be consistently capitalized throughout the text.

 

Response 1: Thank you for pointing this out. We agree with this comment. We have capitalized all family names throughout the manuscript.

 

Comments 2: Lines 157-206: I believe some information on biochemical compounds, morphology, and phylogeny of plant families is unnecessary for this type of research. Please make it shorter and more concise.

Response 2: According to the comment, we have synthesized the information in line 157-206.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop