When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Mindful Consumption
2.1.1. Mindful Consumption and Green Purchase Intention
2.1.2. Mindful Consumption and Health Consciousness
2.1.3. Mindful Consumption and Ethical Self-Identity
2.1.4. Mindful Consumption and Environmental Consciousness
2.2. Green Purchase Intention
2.2.1. Health Consciousness and Green Purchase Intention
2.2.2. Ethical Self-Identity and Green Purchase Intention
2.2.3. Environmental Consciousness and Green Purchase Intention
2.3. Mediating Roles of Health Consciousness, Ethical Self-Identity, and Environmental Consciousness
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Hypotheses and Model
3.2. Questionnaire Design
3.3. Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
5. Discussions
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Practical Implications
6. Conclusions and Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Items | Sources |
---|---|---|
Mindful consumption (Awareness) | A1. I care about the impact of my consumption on society/community. | [28] |
A2. I am aware that my consumption impacts society. | ||
A3. Sharing my products with others means caring for society. | ||
Mindful consumption (Caring) | C1. I try to avoid damaging the environment in my daily life. | [28] |
C2. I satisfy my consumption needs without harming the environment. | ||
C3. I buy products that are not harmful to others. | ||
C4. Everyone should conserve water at home. | ||
C5. Using public services (e.g., parks, transportation) is good for society. | ||
Mindful consumption (Temperance) | T1. I refrain from buying the latest product if the current product is working. | [28] |
T2. I try to minimize my consumption even in the case of abundance. | ||
T3. I have a habit of minimizing the wastage of clothes. | ||
Environmental consciousness | EC1: The balance of nature is strong enough to cope with the impacts of modern industrialization. | [18,71] |
EC2: The so-called ecological crisis facing human kind has been greatly exaggerated. | ||
EC3: Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their needs. | ||
Ethical self-identity | EI1: As a consumer I think of myself as socially responsible. | [11] |
EI2: I think of myself as someone concerned about a company’s activities that benefits the society. | ||
EI3: As a consumer, I am orientated toward buying products that are made keeping the society’s welfare in mind. | ||
Green purchase intention | GPI1: When traveling, I am willing to choose greener and healthier tourism products/services. | [61,69,70] |
GPI2: I plan to choose green travel products/services when traveling because they save energy. | ||
GPI3: I will try to buy green travel products/services during my travels because they have better added value. | ||
GPI4: I will purchase products/services that are considered less harmful to the environment. | ||
GPI5: I will avoid buying products and services that are potentially harmful to the tourist places. | ||
Health consciousness | HC1: When traveling, I pay close attention to my health and consider health factors when purchasing products for others. | [18,71] |
HC2: I take responsibility for the state of my health and the health of others for whom I shop for while traveling. | ||
HC3: I am very involved with my health and the health of others for whom I shop for while traveling. |
References
- Ukaogo, P.O.; Ewuzie, U.; Onwuka, C.V. Environmental pollution: Causes, effects, and the remedies. In Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 419–429. [Google Scholar]
- Harrisson, T. Tourism Responsible for 8% of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Study Finds. Carbon Brief. Available online: https://www.carbonbrief.org/tourism-responsible-for-8-of-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-study-finds (accessed on 22 September 2024).
- Saari, U.A.; Damberg, S.; Frömbling, L.; Ringle, C.M. Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 189, 107155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilkaite-Vaitone, N.; Tamuliene, V. Unveiling the Untapped Potential of Green Consumption in Tourism. Sustainability 2023, 16, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fauzi, M.A.; Hanafiah, M.H.; Kunjuraman, V. Tourists’ intention to visit green hotels: Building on the theory of planned behaviour and the value-belief-norm theory. J. Tour. Futur. 2024, 10, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.L. Understanding consumers’ preferences for green hotels—The roles of perceived green benefits and environmental knowledge. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2023, 6, 1309–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W.; Narayanan Alagas, E. Antecedents of green purchase behaviour: An examination of altruism and environmental knowledge. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2020, 14, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Tao, Y.; Shao, M.; Yu, C. Understand the Chinese Z Generation consumers’ Green hotel visit intention: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Sethia, N.K.; Srinivas, S. Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 39, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onwezen, M.C.; Antonides, G.; Bartels, J. The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 2013, 39, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, C.; Gentina, E.; Kaur, T. Mindfulness and green purchase intention: A mediated moderation model uncovering the role of ethical self-identity. Ecol. Econ. 2023, 209, 107810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lathabhavan, R.; Lathabhavan, R. Understanding the behavioural drivers of mindful consumption: A study on the use of sustainable menstrual products. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2024, 16, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manchanda, P.; Arora, N.; Nazir, O.; Islam, J.U. Cultivating sustainability consciousness through Mindfulness: An application of theory of mindful consumption. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 75, 103527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawaz, S.; Jiang, Y.; Nawaz, M.Z.; Manzoor, S.F.; Zhang, R. Mindful consumption, ego-involvement, and social norms impact on buying SHC: Role of platform trust and impulsive buying tendency. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 215824402110566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tewari, A.; Srivastava, S.; Gangwar, D.; Verma, V.C. Young consumers’ purchase intention toward organic food: Exploring the role of Mindfulness. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahid, N.M.; Khan, J.; Tao, M. Exploring mindful consumption, ego involvement, and social norms influencing second-hand clothing purchase. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 13960–13974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, U.; Lavuri, R.; Bilal, M.; Hameed, I.; Byun, J. Exploring the roles of green marketing tools and green motives on green purchase intention in sustainable tourism destinations: A cross-cultural study. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2024, 41, 453–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benos, T.; Burkert, M.; Hüttl-Maack, V.; Petropoulou, E. When mindful consumption meets short food supply chains: Empirical evidence on how higher-level motivations influence consumers. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 33, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liobikienė, G.; Poškus, M.S. The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere pro-environmental behavior: Modifying the value-belief-norm theory. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Al Mamun, A.; Naznen, F.; Siyu, L.; Makhbul, Z.K.M. Modelling the significance of health values, beliefs and norms on the intention to consume and the consumption of organic foods. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, B.; Yang, Z. The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 59, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barber, N.A.; Deale, C. Tapping Mindfulness to Shape Hotel Guests’ Sustainable Behavior. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2014, 55, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadhavi, P.; Sahni, H. Analyzing the ‘Mindfulness’ of Young Indian Consumers in their Fashion Consumption. J. Glob. Mark. 2020, 33, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabat-Zinn, J. Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2003, 10, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langer, E.J. Minding Matters: The Consequences of Mindlessness-Mindfulness. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 22, 137–173. [Google Scholar]
- Carson, S.H.; Langer, E.J. Mindfulness and self-acceptance. J. Ration.-Emot. Cogn.-Behav. Ther. 2006, 24, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milne, G.R.; Villarroel Ordenes, F.; Kaplan, B. Mindful Consumption: Three Consumer Segment Views. Australas. Mark. J. 2020, 28, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.; Sheth, J. Mindful consumption: Its conception, measurement, and implications. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2023, 52, 1531–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahl, S.; Milne, G.R.; Ross, S.M.; Mick, D.G.; Grier, S.A.; Chugani, S.K.; Chan, S.S.; Gould, S.; Cho, Y.N.; Dorsey, J.D.; et al. Mindfulness: Its transformative potential for consumer, societal, and environmental well-being. J. Public Policy Mark. 2016, 35, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, R.; Bansal, S.; Rathi, R.; Bhowmick, S. Mindful consumption—A systematic review and research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 459, 142373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhandra, T.K. Achieving triple dividend through Mindfulness: More sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption, and more life satisfaction. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 161, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Prabha, V.; Kumar, V.; Saxena, S. Mindfulness in marketing and consumption: A review and research agenda. Manag. Rev. Q. 2023, 74, 977–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sermboonsang, R.; Tansuhaj, P.S.; Silpakit, C.; Chaisuwan, C. Mindfulness-based transformational learning for managing impulse buying. J. Educ. Bus. 2020, 95, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parashar, S.; Singh, S.; Sood, G. Examining the role of health consciousness, environmental awareness and intention on purchase of organic food: A moderated model of attitude. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 386, 135553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellini, G.; Acampora, M.; Provenzi, L.; Cagliero, L.; Lucini, L.; Barello, S. Health consciousness and pro-environmental behaviors in an Italian representative sample: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donald, J.N.; Lomas, T.; Ekas, N.V.; Easterbrook, M.J.; Ciarrochi, J. Does your Mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the link between Mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. Br. J. Psychol. 2019, 110, 101–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Vansteenkiste, M. Self-determination theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2023; pp. 3–30. [Google Scholar]
- Geiger, S.M.; Otto, S.; Schrader, U. Mindfully green and healthy: An indirect path from Mindfulness to ecological behavior. Front. Psychol. 2018, 8, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertz, S.G.; Krettenauer, T. Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2016, 20, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanel, V.; Basil, D.Z. Socially conscious consumer behavior: The role of ethical self-identity and priming. Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark. 2023, 20, 427–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wei, L.; Zeng, X.; Zhu, J. Mindfulness in ethical consumption: The mediating roles of connectedness to nature and self-control. Int. Mark. Rev. 2021, 38, 756–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H. Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1977; Volume 10, pp. 221–279. [Google Scholar]
- Bonnett, M. Environmental consciousness, sustainability, and the character of philosophy of education. Stud. Philos. Educ. 2017, 36, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.N. Elucidating the effects of environmental consciousness and environmental attitude on green travel behavior: Moderating role of green self-efficacy. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 32, 2223–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunecke, M.; Richter, N. Mindfulness, construction of meaning, and sustainable food consumption. Mindfulness 2019, 10, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maduku, D.K. How environmental concerns influence consumers’ anticipated emotions towards sustainable consumption: The moderating role of regulatory focus. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 76, 103593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Hu, J.; Chen, M.; Tang, S. Motives and antecedents affecting green purchase intention: Implications for green economic recovery. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 77, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schutte, N.S.; Malouff, J.M. Mindfulness and connectedness to nature: A meta-analytic investigation. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2018, 127, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, J.; Paul, J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 38, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, S.; Narwal, K.P.; Kumar, S. Exploring the determinants of purchase intention of organic consumers for organic food items: An exploratory study in India. Br. Food J. 2023, 126, 1238–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akerlof, G.A.; Kranton, R.E. Economics and identity. Q. J. Econ. 2000, 115, 715–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geiger, S.M.; Grossman, P.; Schrader, U. Mindfulness and sustainability: Correlation or causation? Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2019, 28, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, P.C.; Ge, J.; Craig, T.; Brewer, M.J.; Thronicker, I. Does work-life balance affect pro-environmental behaviour? Evidence for the UK using longitudinal microdata. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 145, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavuri, R.; Thaichon, P. Do extrinsic factors encourage shoppers’ compulsive buying? Store environment and product characteristics. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2023, 41, 722–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talwar, S.; Jabeen, F.; Tandon, A.; Sakashita, M.; Dhir, A. What drives willingness to purchase and stated buying behavior toward organic food? A Stimulus–Organism–Behavior–Consequence (SOBC) perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 293, 125882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trudel, R.; Argo, J.J.; Meng, M.D. The recycled self: Consumers’ disposal decisions of identity-linked products. J. Consum. Res. 2016, 43, 246–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zollo, L. Ethical identity, social image and sustainable fashion: Still an impossible deal? A sociopsychological framework of ethical consumers’ attitude-behavior gaps. J. Consum. Mark. 2024, 41, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; Li, G. Factors affecting green purchase intention: A perspective of ethical decision making. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, D.; Shiu, E. The role of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer choice. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2002, 26, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nekmahmud, M.; Ramkissoon, H.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Green purchase and sustainable consumption: A comparative study between European and non-European tourists. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 43, 100980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.; Lee, K. Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: The moderating impact of situational context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laheri, V.K.; Lim, W.M.; Arya, P.K.; Kumar, S. A multidimensional lens of environmental consciousness: Towards an environmentally conscious theory of planned behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2024, 41, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, C.S.R.; Costa, M.F.D.; Maciel, R.G.; Aguiar, E.C.; Wanderley, L.O. Consumer antecedents towards green product purchase intentions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 313, 127964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simanjuntak, M.; Nafila, N.L.; Yuliati, L.N.; Johan, I.R.; Najib, M.; Sabri, M.F. Environmental care attitudes and intention to purchase green products: Impact of environmental knowledge, word of mouth, and green marketing. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Cudjoe, D.; Bai, R.; Farrukh, M. How does perceived severity of COVID-19 influence purchase intention of organic food? Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 3353–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.-C.; Chang, H.-H.; Chang, A. Consumer personality and green buying intention: The mediate role of consumer ethical beliefs. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 127, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.; Verma, H. Mindful consumption behaviour: Scale development and validation. Asian J. Multidimens. Res. (AJMR) 2019, 8, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.T.; Liu, Y.; Mo, Z. Moral norm is the key: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) on Chinese consumers’ green purchase intention. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 1823–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, T.K.; Kumar, A.; Jakhar, S.; Luthra, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kazancoglu, I.; Nayak, S.S. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, D.; Memery, J.; De Silva Kanakaratne, M. The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sparks, P.; Shepherd, R. Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism”. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1992, 55, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, J.-M.; Klein, K.; Wetzels, M. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Plan. 2012, 45, 359–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Mitchell, R.; Gudergan, S.P. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 1617–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Howard, M.C.; Nitzl, C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 109, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etikan, I.; Musa, S.A.; Alkassim, R.S. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2016, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N.P.; Ray, S. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gannon, M.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Taheri, B. Assessing the mediating role of residents’ perceptions toward tourism development. J. Travel Res. 2021, 60, 149–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrión, G.C.; Nitzl, C.; Roldán, J.L. Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and empirical examples. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling; Latan, H., Noonan, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 173–195. [Google Scholar]
- People’s Daily Commentary Department. Lucid Waters and Lush Mountains Are Mountains of Gold and Silver. People’s Daily Online. Available online: http://m.people.cn/n4/2022/0929/c25-20291536.html (accessed on 4 September 2024).
- Bazhan, M.; Shafiei Sabet, F.; Borumandnia, N. Factors affecting purchase intention of organic food products: Evidence from a developing nation context. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 3469–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gundala, R.R.; Singh, A. What motivates consumers to buy organic foods? Results of an empirical study in the United States. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, H.; Wu, Z.; Du, S. Study on the impact of environmental awareness, health consciousness, and individual basic conditions on the consumption intention of green furniture. Sustain. Futur. 2024, 8, 100245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosany, S.; Sthapit, E.; Björk, P. Memorable tourism experience: A review and research agenda. Psychol. Mark. 2022, 39, 1467–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.; Zhong, X.; Kang, T.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. Individualism vs. collectivism: Influences on attitudes in China toward the search for meaning in life. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 14738–14750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro Campos, B.; Qi, X. A literature review on the drivers and barriers of organic food consumption in China. Agric. Food Econ. 2024, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conner, M.; Norman, P. Understanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 923464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.I.-L.; Scott, N.; Benckendorff, P. Mindful tourist experiences: A Buddhist perspective. Ann. Tour. Res. 2017, 64, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ripoll González, L.; Yanotti, M.B.; Lehman, K. Local focus: Farmers’ markets as an approach to sustainable tourism. In Planning and Managing Sustainability in Tourism. Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management; Farmaki, A., Altinay, L., Font, X., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 95–113. [Google Scholar]
Ingredient 1 (SE) | Ingredient 2 (PR) | |
---|---|---|
A1 | 0.771 | |
A2 | 0.692 | |
A3 | 0.575 | |
C1 | 0.765 | |
C2 | 0.792 | |
C3 | 0.765 | |
C4 | 0.541 | |
C5 | 0.658 | |
T1 | 0.875 | |
T2 | 0.798 | |
T3 | 0.751 |
Construct | Items | Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE | A1 | 0.793 | 0.852 | 0.891 | 0.577 |
A2 | 0.755 | ||||
A3 | 0.622 | ||||
C1 | 0.825 | ||||
C2 | 0.78 | ||||
C3 | 0.768 | ||||
PR | C4 | 0.726 | 0.83 | 0.881 | 0.597 |
C5 | 0.795 | ||||
T1 | 0.865 | ||||
T2 | 0.767 | ||||
T3 | 0.7 | ||||
EC | EC1 | 0.775 | 0.734 | 0.85 | 0.655 |
EC2 | 0.875 | ||||
EC3 | 0.773 | ||||
EI | EI1 | 0.842 | 0.786 | 0.875 | 0.7 |
EI2 | 0.856 | ||||
EI3 | 0.812 | ||||
GPI | GPI1 | 0.848 | 0.882 | 0.914 | 0.682 |
GPI2 | 0.878 | ||||
GPI3 | 0.823 | ||||
GPI4 | 0.836 | ||||
GPI5 | 0.736 | ||||
HC | HC1 | 0.894 | 0.841 | 0.903 | 0.756 |
HC2 | 0.887 | ||||
HC3 | 0.826 | ||||
Formative Construct | Items | Outer Weight | t-value | p-value | VIF |
Mindful consumption (MC) | Social and environmental consciousness (SE) | 0.650 | 7.589 | 0.000 | 1.433 |
Personal and social resource conservation (PR) | 0.483 | 5.066 | 0.000 | 1.433 |
Fornell–Larcker Criterion | HTMT Criterion | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC | EI | GPI | HC | PR | SE | EC | EI | GPI | HC | PR | SE | |
EC | 0.809 | |||||||||||
EI | 0.38 | 0.837 | 0.492 | |||||||||
GPI | 0.474 | 0.622 | 0.826 | 0.588 | 0.739 | |||||||
HC | 0.17 | 0.46 | 0.283 | 0.87 | 0.206 | 0.571 | 0.319 | |||||
PR | 0.287 | 0.582 | 0.584 | 0.284 | 0.773 | 0.369 | 0.718 | 0.685 | 0.331 | |||
SE | 0.341 | 0.592 | 0.685 | 0.249 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.423 | 0.716 | 0.795 | 0.284 | 0.646 |
Hypothesis | β | S.D. | CI (5%, 95%) | t-Value | p-Value | Decision | f2 | R2 | Q2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: MC -> GPI | 0.521 | 0.071 | (0.376, 0.654) | 7.380 | 0.000 | Accepted | 0.396 | 0.600 | 0.516 |
H2: MC -> HC | 0.299 | 0.077 | (0.161, 0.459) | 3.866 | 0.000 | Accepted | 0.098 | 0.090 | 0.114 |
H3: MC -> EI | 0.666 | 0.040 | (0.588, 0.745) | 16.473 | 0.000 | Accepted | 0.798 | 0.444 | 0.427 |
H4: MC -> EC | 0.361 | 0.063 | (0.234, 0.485) | 5.733 | 0.000 | Accepted | 0.149 | 0.130 | 0.065 |
H5: HC -> GPI | 0.002 | 0.040 | (−0.071, 0.085) | 0.055 | 0.956 | Rejected | 0.000 | ||
H6: EI -> GPI | 0.192 | 0.078 | (0.047, 0.349) | 2.471 | 0.014 | Accepted | 0.043 | ||
H7: EC -> GPI | 0.213 | 0.062 | (0.087, 0.334) | 3.409 | 0.001 | Accepted | 0.095 |
Hypothesis | β | CI (5%, 95%) | S.D. | t-Value | p-Value | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H8a: MC -> HC -> GPI | 0.001 | (−0.023, 0.031) | 0.013 | 0.05 | 0.96 | Rejected |
H8b: MC -> EI -> GPI | 0.128 | (0.031, 0.24) | 0.054 | 2.372 | 0.018 | Accepted |
H8c: MC -> EC -> GPI | 0.077 | (0.031, 0.13) | 0.025 | 3.014 | 0.003 | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ji, D.; Pongsakornrungsilp, S.; Pongsakornrungsilp, P.; Kumar, V. When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031266
Ji D, Pongsakornrungsilp S, Pongsakornrungsilp P, Kumar V. When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists. Sustainability. 2025; 17(3):1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031266
Chicago/Turabian StyleJi, Dongyi, Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp, Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp, and Vikas Kumar. 2025. "When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists" Sustainability 17, no. 3: 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031266
APA StyleJi, D., Pongsakornrungsilp, S., Pongsakornrungsilp, P., & Kumar, V. (2025). When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists. Sustainability, 17(3), 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031266