Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Overview of Deep Learning
2.1. Overview of Deep Learning Techniques
- High energy consumption and carbon emissions: In recent years, the training scale of deep learning models (e.g., Transformer, BERT, GPT) has grown exponentially, leading to a sharp increase in computational costs and energy consumption. This trend accelerates the depletion of non-renewable energy sources and poses a threat to future energy security. For instance, training a BERT model generates approximately 1438 pounds of CO2 emissions, equivalent to the carbon footprint of a car traveling 1000 miles [39]. These emissions contribute to air pollution and global warming, contradicting the principles of sustainable agriculture. To achieve sustainable applications of deep learning in agriculture, model architectures and training strategies need to be optimized to reduce computational energy consumption and minimize environmental impact. Lightweight networks (e.g., MobileNet, EfficientNet) can reduce computational complexity and enable efficient operation of low-computing-power devices. Knowledge distillation techniques utilize large models to guide the learning of small models, reducing resource requirements while maintaining performance. Model pruning reduces computation by removing redundant parameters and increases inference speed. Combined with low-power hardware (e.g., Raspberry Pi, NVIDIA Jetson), efficient local computation can be realized in field environments, reducing energy consumption for cloud transmission. Future research should synthesize these approaches to promote energy-efficient applications of deep learning in agriculture and improve its sustainability and scalability.
- Computational resource demands and accessibility issues: The training of deep learning models heavily relies on high-performance computing resources such as GPUs and TPUs. However, many agricultural research institutions and farmers, particularly those in developing countries, struggle to afford such costly hardware. Additionally, the centralization of computing resources (e.g., cloud-based data centers) may further exacerbate regional disparities in agricultural technology development, allowing technologically advanced regions to dominate while limiting access to underdeveloped areas. To address the challenges of deep learning applications in resource-constrained environments, algorithms, model optimization, and computational architectures are needed. The development of low computational cost algorithms reduces complexity and improves adaptability, such as efficient network structures based on sparse representations or self-attentive mechanisms. Model parameter optimization involves not only pruning and quantization but can also be combined with dynamic computational mechanisms that allow the model to adjust computational resources according to task demands. The introduction of edge computing can be combined with distributed reasoning to reasonably allocate computational tasks to multiple devices and achieve load balancing, while combining adaptive data sampling and transmission strategies to reduce bandwidth requirements and improve real-time response capabilities in agricultural environments.
- Risk of declining crop diversity: The stability of agricultural ecosystems largely depends on biodiversity. Studies have shown that biodiversity can enhance lettuce productivity through the complementary effect and reduce disease transmission risks via the dilution effect [40]. However, deep learning-driven agricultural practices may prioritize optimizing high-yield or high-profit cultivars while neglecting crop diversity, thus promoting monoculture farming. This practice can reduce the resilience of farmland ecosystems, making crops more susceptible to diseases and extreme climate conditions, ultimately threatening agricultural sustainability. Therefore, when applying deep learning to optimize lettuce production, it is crucial to consider ecosystem stability and incorporate intelligent optimization techniques, such as multi-objective optimization algorithms, to encourage the cultivation of diverse lettuce varieties, thereby enhancing long-term sustainability and resilience in agricultural systems.
2.2. Overview of Common Deep Learning Methods in Agriculture
2.2.1. Discriminative Learning
- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [42]: CNNs are widely utilized in image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation due to their superior feature extraction capabilities. In agricultural production, CNNs have been extensively applied to crop health monitoring, lettuce growth stage recognition, pest and disease detection, and plant phenotyping [43,44,45].
- Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and its variants (Long Short-Term Memory, LSTM; Gated Recurrent Unit, GRU) [46]: RNNs are well-suited for handling sequential data, such as environmental parameter prediction and meteorological condition analysis. However, traditional RNNs suffer from gradient vanishing issues, limiting their ability to model long-term dependencies. To address this, LSTM and GRU were introduced to enhance long-range dependency learning. For example, LSTM can be used to predict temperature, humidity, and light variation in lettuce cultivation environments, aiding in optimized cultivation management strategies.
- Deep Neural Networks (DNN) [47]: DNNs, characterized by their hierarchical structure and strong representational capabilities, can automatically extract complex features and process high-dimensional nonlinear data. Their advantages include powerful learning ability, good generalization performance, and adaptability to large-scale data, making them widely applicable in image recognition, speech processing, and intelligent control [48]. Through end-to-end learning and integration with various techniques, DNNs can be applied in agriculture for automated decision-making tasks such as soil quality assessment and crop yield prediction.
2.2.2. Generative Learning
- Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) [50]: GANs consist of a generator and a discriminator, which compete during training to produce high-quality synthetic data. In agriculture, GANs can be used to generate synthetic crop disease images, enhancing datasets and improving the robustness and generalization capability of pest and disease identification models.
- Variational Autoencoders (VAE) [51]: VAEs generate new data through probabilistic modeling and are commonly applied in crop phenotyping data augmentation. For instance, in lettuce phenotype research, VAEs can generate virtual images of different growth stages, thereby improving the generalization ability of deep learning models.
2.2.3. Hybrid Learning
- CNN + LSTM hybrid model: CNN extracts image features, while LSTM processes temporal sequences. In lettuce production, this approach enables the integration of image data and environmental sensor data for growth monitoring and yield prediction.
- Autoencoder (AE) + CNN: The autoencoder performs dimensionality reduction and feature extraction, while CNN handles classification tasks. For instance, in autonomous farm management, this method can be applied in intelligent monitoring systems for real-time surveillance of lettuce cultivation areas.
- Transformer architecture: In recent years, Transformer models, based on self-attention mechanisms, have demonstrated outstanding performance in computer vision tasks. For example, Vision Transformer has been applied in lettuce growth stage recognition and pest and disease diagnosis [20], providing higher classification accuracy.
3. The Applications of Deep Learning in Lettuce Cultivation
- Pest and disease control:
- (a)
- Pest and disease diagnosis;
- (b)
- Precision spraying;
- (c)
- Pesticides residue detection.
- Crop monitoring:
- (a)
- Condition monitoring;
- (b)
- Classification of growth stages;
- (c)
- Yield prediction.
- Field management:
- (a)
- Weed management;
- (b)
- Irrigation and fertilization management.
3.1. Pest and Disease Control
3.1.1. Pest and Disease Diagnosis
3.1.2. Precision Spraying
3.1.3. Pesticides Residue Detection
- Data scarcity: A major bottleneck for deep learning applications in lettuce is the lack of comprehensive datasets. Unlike staple crops such as rice and wheat, lettuce—an economic crop—has received less research attention, resulting in fragmented and limited annotated datasets. This scarcity restricts model training capabilities and generalization performance.
- Environmental adaptability: The diverse ecological conditions, pest and disease types, and cultivation practices across regions hinder data integration, limiting model adaptability in cross-regional applications.
- Economic costs: High implementation costs remain a key challenge for intelligent precision agriculture. Although deep learning models offer high detection accuracy, their deployment in real-world agricultural settings requires high-performance computing resources (GPU/TPU), sensors, drones, or automated systems, which are often unaffordable for small and medium-sized farms.
- Technical barriers: The specialized nature of deep learning technology creates a significant adoption hurdle. From data collection and model training to system deployment, implementing deep learning requires advanced technical expertise, yet most agricultural producers lack the necessary AI knowledge and skills, restricting its practical applications.
- Impact of environmental factors: The complexity of environmental variables poses a major challenge for deep learning models. Lettuce growth is influenced by light, temperature, humidity, soil nutrients, and nutrient solution concentrations, and fluctuations in these variables can destabilize model predictions, reducing model robustness across different growing conditions.
- Pesticide residue accumulation: Although precision spraying technology reduces pesticide usage, residue accumulation remains a critical concern. Further research is needed to optimize spraying strategies, minimize harmful element absorption by crops, and develop intelligent monitoring and control systems to ensure food safety and environmental sustainability.
3.2. Crop Monitoring
3.2.1. Condition Monitoring
3.2.2. Classification of Growth Stages
3.2.3. Yield Prediction
- Environmental variations affecting image quality: Fluctuations in light intensity may lead to brightness variations in lettuce images, reducing the detection accuracy of target recognition models.
- External factors causing image blur: Biotic and abiotic factors in agricultural fields, such as insect activity and strong winds causing leaf movement, may result in blurry images, thereby reducing model stability and robustness.
- Diversity of cultivation environments: Environmental conditions in different growing regions may significantly differ from the training dataset, leading to a decline in model generalization ability and affecting prediction accuracy.
Research Direction | Main Methodology | Key Results | References |
---|---|---|---|
Condition Monitoring | Traditional Spectral Analysis + Machine Learning (PLS, ELM, GA-siPLS) |
| [73,74,75,76,77,78] |
Deep Learning (YOLO-NPK, VGG16, VGG19, Inception, ResNet, RNN) | |||
Growth Stage Classification | YOLOv10, DETR |
| [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86] |
YOLOXs (Attention Mechanism + Adaptive Spatial Feature Fusion) | |||
AUNet, U-Net, DeepLabV3+ | |||
Yield Prediction | Multi-branch deep learning (U-Net + RGB-D features + iterative regression) |
| [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97] |
RNN (time series data fusion) | |||
CNN + Spectral Attention Mechanism |
3.3. Field Management
3.3.1. Weed Management
3.3.2. Irrigation and Fertilization Management
- Limited generalization ability in weed recognition: The high diversity of weed species and variability in growth environments present challenges for deep learning models. Some weeds closely resemble lettuce in appearance, reducing model generalization in complex environments.
- High computational resource requirements: Despite achieving high speed and accuracy in object detection tasks, deep learning models demand significant computational resources, leading to high application costs in agricultural production and imposing an additional burden on farms [122]. Future research should focus on developing lighter models to improve real-time detection performance and reduce hardware costs.
- Herbicide resistance: Prolonged use of the same herbicide can lead to weed resistance, reducing weed control effectiveness. Therefore, integrating biological control, crop rotation, and novel herbicide strategies is essential to mitigate resistance risks.
- Ecological impact of herbicides: Certain herbicides can negatively affect the environment and biodiversity, hindering the ecological sustainability of lettuce farming. To address this, more environmentally friendly weeding techniques, such as laser-based or mechanical methods, should be developed to minimize chemical herbicide use.
- Economic feasibility challenges: The high cost of smart irrigation and fertilization systems, including sensors, control systems, and automation hardware, makes it difficult for small farms to afford installation and maintenance, limiting economic sustainability. Future research should explore low-cost, high-efficiency solutions to facilitate the widespread adoption of intelligent agricultural technologies.
Research Direction | Main Methodology | Key Results | References |
---|---|---|---|
Weed Management | SVM, YOLOv3, Mask R-CNN, NDVI |
| [98,103,104,105,108,109] |
YOLOv5x, YOLOv7-L (incorporating Efficient Channel Attention, Coordinate Attention, ELAN-B3, and DownC modules) | |||
SPH-YOLOv5x (SPPF replaced by SPPFCSPC, CBAM attention mechanism) | |||
Geometric appearance detection + UV illumination + multi-angle mirror imaging | |||
YOLOv5-based system with color correction and lightweight feature extraction network | |||
Irrigation and Fertilization Management | Solar-powered IoT irrigation, K-means clustering for irrigation scheduling |
| [110,114,116,117,118,119,120,121] |
Faster R-CNN-Inception-V2, motor-driven irrigation systems, deep learning-based Line Generation Method | |||
MobileNetV2-SVM-based vision system, MFC-CNN for moisture content prediction, thermal imaging with YOLOv4 | |||
Integrated infrared thermal imaging with deep learning models for stress detection |
4. Discussion
4.1. Advantages of Deep Learning in Lettuce Cultivation
4.2. Challenges of Deep Learning in Lettuce Cultivation
4.3. Future Perspectives
- Sensor Fusion: The integration of RGB, multispectral, thermal imaging, and SAR high-resolution sensors can enhance lettuce phenotypic prediction, soil analysis, and yield estimation, while also contributing to the development of fully autonomous farms [92,153,154,155,156]. Although multimodal data fusion—such as integrating hyperspectral imaging with IoT-based sensors—has been proposed as a promising direction, several technical challenges must be addressed to enable real-time decision-making. First, synchronizing heterogeneous data streams from different sensors remains a major obstacle, as variations in data acquisition rates and environmental conditions can introduce temporal misalignment. Second, interpreting fused data requires advanced deep learning models capable of extracting relevant features while filtering out noise from multimodal inputs. Third, computational efficiency is a critical concern, particularly for edge computing applications, where processing power is limited. Moreover, optical field optimization strategies offer innovative solutions for precision laser manipulation, enhanced machine vision, and multimodal sensor fusion in intelligent agricultural equipment, especially in complex environments where adaptive navigation and real-time visual feedback systems are essential [157].
- Drone Technology: Drones equipped with deep learning algorithms and sensors enable intelligent pesticide spraying and fertilization, reducing manual intervention and minimizing agriculture’s ecological impact [158].
- Irrigation and Fertilization Robots: Compared to traditional agricultural machinery, deep learning-enabled smart irrigation and fertilization robots possess precision sensing, autonomous decision-making, and intelligent control capabilities, allowing them to adapt to complex agricultural environments and perform highly efficient precision operations [159].
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lindqvist, K. On the Origin of Cultivated Lettuce. Hereditas 1960, 46, 319–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Moon, Y.; Tou, J.C.; Mou, B.; Waterland, N.L. Nutritional Value, Bioactive Compounds and Health Benefits of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 49, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, L. Lettuce-Manufactured Pharmaceuticals. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shatilov, M.; Razin, A.; Ivanova, M. Analysis of the World Lettuce Market. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 395, 012053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.-T.; Wang, R.-F.; Tu, Y.-H.; Pang, X.-X.; Su, W.-H. Automatic Lettuce Weed Detection and Classification Based on Optimized Convolutional Neural Networks for Robotic Weed Control. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, T.M.; Cividanes, F.J.; Salles, F.A.; Pacífico Manfrim Perticarrari, A.L.; Zambon da Cunha, S.B.; Monteiro dos Santos-Cividanes, T. Insect Pests and Natural Enemies Associated with Lettuce Lactuca sativa L. (Asteraceae) in an Aquaponics System. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Embaby, E.-S.M.; Lotfy, D.E.-S. Ecological Studies on Cabbage Pests. J. Agric. Technol. 2015, 11, 1145–1160. [Google Scholar]
- Simko, I.; Atallah, A.J.; Ochoa, O.E.; Antonise, R.; Galeano, C.H.; Truco, M.J.; Michelmore, R.W. Identification of QTLs Conferring Resistance to Downy Mildew in Legacy Cultivars of Lettuce. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- German-Retana, S.; Walter, J.; Le Gall, O. Lettuce Mosaic Virus: From Pathogen Diversity to Host Interactors. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamberoglu, M.; Alan, B. Occurrence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Lettuce in Cukurova Region of Turkey. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13, 431–434. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, J.; Xu, F.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.; Wang, S.; Du, L.; Ding, G. Evaluation of the Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Applications on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.Z.; Guo, S.S.; Ai, W.D.; Tang, Y.K. Effects of Illuminants and Illumination Time on Lettuce Growth, Yield and Nutritional Quality in a Controlled Environment. Life Sci. Space Res. 2014, 2, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda, A.; Moreno, G.; Martínez, O. Effects of Environmental Factors on the Morphometric Characteristics of Cultivated Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agron. Colomb. 2012, 30, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.-F.; Su, W.-H. The Application of Deep Learning in the Whole Potato Production Chain: A Comprehensive Review. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, G.; Wang, R.-F. The Heterogeneous Network Community Detection Model Based on Self-Attention. Symmetry 2025, 17, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, C.-H.; Qu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Wang, M.-J.-S. HybridGNN: A Self-Supervised Graph Neural Network for Efficient Maximum Matching in Bipartite Graphs. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.-H.; Wang, R.-F.; Su, W.-H. Active Disturbance Rejection Control—New Trends in Agricultural Cybernetics in the Future: A Comprehensive Review. Machines 2025, 13, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camalan, S.; Cui, K.; Pauca, V.P.; Alqahtani, S.; Silman, M.; Chan, R.; Plemmons, R.J.; Dethier, E.N.; Fernandez, L.E.; Lutz, D.A. Change Detection of Amazonian Alluvial Gold Mining Using Deep Learning and Sentinel-2 Imagery. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latif, G.; Abdelhamid, S.E.; Mallouhy, R.E.; Alghazo, J.; Kazimi, Z.A. Deep Learning Utilization in Agriculture: Detection of Rice Plant Diseases Using an Improved CNN Model. Plants 2022, 11, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Lai, T.; Zhang, M. Self-Supervised Transformer-Based Pre-Training Method with General Plant Infection Dataset. In Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision, Urumqi, China, 18–20 October 2024; Lin, Z., Cheng, M.-M., He, R., Ubul, K., Silamu, W., Zha, H., Zhou, J., Liu, C.-L., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 189–202. [Google Scholar]
- Nasiri, A.; Omid, M.; Taheri-Garavand, A.; Jafari, A. Deep Learning-Based Precision Agriculture through Weed Recognition in Sugar Beet Fields. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2022, 35, 100759. [Google Scholar]
- Su, D.; Kong, H.; Qiao, Y.; Sukkarieh, S. Data Augmentation for Deep Learning Based Semantic Segmentation and Crop-Weed Classification in Agricultural Robotics. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106418. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Z.; Yin, C.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Gu, Z. Research on Apple Recognition and Localization Method Based on Deep Learning. Agronomy 2025, 15, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escorcia-Gutierrez, J.; Gamarra, M.; Soto-Diaz, R.; Pérez, M.; Madera, N.; Mansour, R.F. Intelligent Agricultural Modelling of Soil Nutrients and pH Classification Using Ensemble Deep Learning Techniques. Agriculture 2022, 12, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Bai, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, R. Yield Estimation of High-Density Cotton Fields Using Low-Altitude UAV Imaging and Deep Learning. Plant Methods 2022, 18, 55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- El-Habil, B.Y.; Abu-Naser, S.S. Global Climate Prediction Using Deep Learning. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2022, 100, 4824–4838. [Google Scholar]
- Prodhan, F.A.; Zhang, J.; Yao, F.; Shi, L.; Pangali Sharma, T.P.; Zhang, D.; Cao, D.; Zheng, M.; Ahmed, N.; Mohana, H.P. Deep Learning for Monitoring Agricultural Drought in South Asia Using Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sami, M.; Khan, S.Q.; Khurram, M.; Farooq, M.U.; Anjum, R.; Aziz, S.; Qureshi, R.; Sadak, F. A Deep Learning-Based Sensor Modeling for Smart Irrigation System. Agronomy 2022, 12, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathew, M.P.; Elayidom, S.; Jagathy Raj, V.; Abubeker, K. Development of a Handheld GPU-Assisted DSC-TransNet Model for the Real-Time Classification of Plant Leaf Disease Using Deep Learning Approach. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3579. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, T.; Rehman, S.U.; Ali, S.; Mahmood, K.; Obregon, S.A.; Iglesias, R.C.; Khurshaid, T.; Ashraf, I. Smart Agriculture: Utilizing Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Drought Stress Identification in Crops. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 30062. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Lu, W.; Gao, B.; Kimura, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Rapid Identification of Chrysanthemum Teas by Computer Vision and Deep Learning. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1968–1977. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, P.; Hu, L.; Gao, W.; Gu, L. Identifying Tomato Growth Stages in Protected Agriculture with StyleGAN3–Synthetic Images and Vision Transformer. Agriculture 2025, 15, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Hong, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Li, X.; Yan, Y.; Li, Q. Integrating Convolutional Attention and Encoder–Decoder Long Short-Term Memory for Enhanced Soil Moisture Prediction. Water 2024, 16, 3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cynthia, E.P.; Ismanto, E.; Arifandy, M.I.; Sarbaini, S.; Nazaruddin, N.; Manuhutu, M.A.; Akbar, M.A.; Abdiyanto. Convolutional Neural Network and Deep Learning Approach for Image Detection and Identification. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2394, 012019. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.-S.G.; Moon, S.; Park, J.; Kim, T.; Chung, S. Development of a Machine Vision-Based Weight Prediction System of Butterhead Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Using Deep Learning Models for Industrial Plant Factory. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1365266. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.; Yang, R.; Gao, F.; Wang, W.; Fu, L.; Li, R. Segmentation of Abnormal Leaves of Hydroponic Lettuce Based on DeepLabV3+ for Robotic Sorting. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106443. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, H.; Woodruff, A.; Yadav, A. Improving Lives of Indebted Farmers Using Deep Learning: Predicting Agricultural Produce Prices Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA, 7–12 February 2020; Volume 34, pp. 13294–13299. [Google Scholar]
- Alzubaidi, L.; Zhang, J.; Humaidi, A.J.; Al-Dujaili, A.; Duan, Y.; Al-Shamma, O.; Santamaría, J.; Fadhel, M.A.; Al-Amidie, M.; Farhan, L. Review of Deep Learning: Concepts, CNN Architectures, Challenges, Applications, Future Directions. J. Big Data 2021, 8, 53. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.-J.; Raghavendra, R.; Gupta, U.; Acun, B.; Ardalani, N.; Maeng, K.; Chang, G.; Aga, F.; Huang, J.; Bai, C.; et al. Sustainable Ai: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities. Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. 2022, 4, 795–813. [Google Scholar]
- Cappelli, S.L.; Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Loaiza, V.; Laine, A.-L. Plant Biodiversity Promotes Sustainable Agriculture Directly and via Belowground Effects. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 674–687. [Google Scholar]
- Sarker, I.H. Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Overview on Techniques, Taxonomy, Applications and Research Directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2021, 2, 420. [Google Scholar]
- Lecun, Y.; Bottou, L.; Bengio, Y.; Haffner, P. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. Proc. IEEE 1998, 86, 2278–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, L. A Tutorial Survey of Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications for Deep Learning. APSIPA Trans. Signal Inf. Process. 2014, 3, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, C.; Paterson, A.H.; Robertson, J.S. DeepSeedling: Deep Convolutional Network and Kalman Filter for Plant Seedling Detection and Counting in the Field. Plant Methods 2019, 15, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, C.; Li, C.; He, D.; Song, H. Anchor-Free Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Tracking and Counting Cotton Seedlings and Flowers. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 215, 108359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherstinsky, A. Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network. Phys. Nonlinear Phenom. 2020, 404, 132306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Sun, S.; Duan, X.; Chen, Z. A Study on Deep Neural Networks Framework. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China, 3–5 October 2016; pp. 1519–1522. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, N.; Dai, F.; Chai, X.; Liu, G.; Wu, X.; Huang, B. Review of Collaborative Inference in Edge Intelligence: Emphasis on DNN Partition. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Cyber Science and Technology Congress (CyberSciTech), Boracay Island, Philippines, 5–8 November 2024; pp. 15–22. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, D.; Li, Z.; Wu, Z.; Li, C. Digital Twin/MARS-CycleGAN: Enhancing Sim-to-Real Crop/Row Detection for MARS Phenotyping Robot Using Synthetic Images. J. Field Robot. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodfellow, I.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Generative Adversarial Networks. Commun ACM 2020, 63, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kingma, D.P.; Welling, M. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1312.6114. [Google Scholar]
- Hua, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, H. Deep Belief Networks and Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things, Harbin, China, 17–18 January 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, N.; Ding, S.; Zhang, J.; Xue, Y. An Overview on Restricted Boltzmann Machines. Neurocomputing 2018, 275, 1186–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidon, M.H.; Ahamed, T. Detection of Tip-Burn Stress on Lettuce Grown in an Indoor Environment Using Deep Learning Algorithms. Sensors 2022, 22, 7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macioszek, V.K.; Marciniak, P.; Kononowicz, A.K. Impact of Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum Infection on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Survival and Phenolics Content—A Case Study in a Horticulture Farm in Poland. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Du, M.; Li, Z.; Yu, L.; Lan, G.; Ding, S.; Farooq, T.; He, Z.; She, X. Identification and Genome Characterization of Begomovirus and Satellite Molecules Associated with Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Leaf Curl Disease. Plants 2025, 14, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PlantVillage. Available online: https://plantvillage.psu.edu/ (accessed on 31 March 2025).
- Wissemeier, A.H.; Zühlke, G. Relation between Climatic Variables, Growth and the Incidence of Tipburn in Field-Grown Lettuce as Evaluated by Simple, Partial and Multiple Regression Analysis. Sci. Hortic. 2002, 93, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, S.; Tian, M.; Hu, D.; Xu, M.; Yuan, T.; Zheng, X.; Li, L.; Wei, S. Evaluation and Early Detection of Downy Mildew of Lettuce Using Hyperspectral Imagery. Agriculture 2025, 15, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, R.; Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R. Crop Diagnostic System: A Robust Disease Detection and Management System for Leafy Green Crops Grown in an Aquaponics Facility. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2023, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, A.M.; Słowik, A.; Hezam, I.M.; Abdel-Basset, M. Sustainable Smart System for Vegetables Plant Disease Detection: Four Vegetable Case Studies. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 227, 109672. [Google Scholar]
- Barcenilla, J.A.G.; Maderazo, C.V. Identifying Common Pest and Disease of Lettuce Plants Using Convolutional Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT), Belagavi, India, 24–26 November 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Shen, Y. Identifying the Growth Status of Hydroponic Lettuce Based on YOLO-EfficientNet. Plants 2024, 13, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, G.; Wang, R.-F.; Cui, K. A Local Perspective-Based Model for Overlapping Community Detection. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.21558. [Google Scholar]
- Bari, P.; Ragha, L. Optimizing Pesticide Decisions with Deep Transfer Learning by Recognizing Crop Pest. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on New Frontiers in Communication, Automation, Management and Security (ICCAMS), Bangalore, India, 27–28 October 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; Volume 1, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, N.; Su, D.; Wang, S.; Nyamsuren, P.; Qiao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Cai, Y. LettuceTrack: Detection and Tracking of Lettuce for Robotic Precision Spray in Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1003243. [Google Scholar]
- Maione, C.; Araujo, E.M.; dos Santos-Araujo, S.N.; Boim, A.G.F.; Barbosa, R.M.; Alleoni, L.R.F. Determining the Geographical Origin of Lettuce with Data Mining Applied to Micronutrients and Soil Properties. Sci. Agric. 2021, 79, e20200011. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.; Sun, J.; Lu, B.; Ge, X.; Zhou, X.; Zou, M. Application of Deep Brief Network in Transmission Spectroscopy Detection of Pesticide Residues in Lettuce Leaves. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e13005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.; Peng, K.; Wang, Q.; Sun, C. Lettuce Plant Trace-Element-Deficiency Symptom Identification via Machine Vision Methods. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Sun, J.; Tian, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wu, X.; Hang, Y. A Deep Learning Based Regression Method on Hyperspectral Data for Rapid Prediction of Cadmium Residue in Lettuce Leaves. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2020, 200, 103996. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, X.; Sun, J.; Tian, Y.; Lu, B.; Hang, Y.; Chen, Q. Hyperspectral Technique Combined with Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Compound Heavy Metals in Lettuce. Food Chem. 2020, 321, 126503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Cui, X.; Fan, X.; Suo, X.; Fan, B.; Zhang, X. Automatic Detection of Pesticide Residues on the Surface of Lettuce Leaves Using Images of Feature Wavelengths Spectrum. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 929999. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, H.; Mao, H.; Zhang, X. Determination of Lettuce Nitrogen Content Using Spectroscopy with Efficient Wavelength Selection and Extreme Learning Machine. Zemdirb.-Agric. 2015, 102, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikati, J.; Nouaze, J.C. YOLO-NPK: A Lightweight Deep Network for Lettuce Nutrient Deficiency Classification Based on Improved YOLOv8 Nano. Eng. Proc. 2023, 58, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahsan, M.; Eshkabilov, S.; Cemek, B.; Küçüktopcu, E.; Lee, C.W.; Simsek, H. Deep Learning Models to Determine Nutrient Concentration in Hydroponically Grown Lettuce Cultivars (Lactuca sativa L.). Sustainability 2021, 14, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Fan, J.; Lu, X.; Wen, W.; Shao, S.; Liang, D.; Yang, X.; Guo, X.; Zhao, C. Deep Learning Models Based on Hyperspectral Data and Time-Series Phenotypes for Predicting Quality Attributes in Lettuces under Water Stress. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 211, 108034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidon, M.H.; Ahamed, T. Detection of Defective Lettuce Seedlings Grown in an Indoor Environment under Different Lighting Conditions Using Deep Learning Algorithms. Sensors 2023, 23, 5790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clave, J.; Formales, K.P.; Godoy, G.S.; Macatangay, A.P.; Pedrasa, J.R. Mobile Detection of Macronutrient Deficiencies in Lettuce Plants Using Convolutional Neural Network. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2024—2024 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Singapore, 1–4 December 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1377–1380. [Google Scholar]
- Nagano, S.; Moriyuki, S.; Wakamori, K.; Mineno, H.; Fukuda, H. Leaf-Movement-Based Growth Prediction Model Using Optical Flow Analysis and Machine Learning in Plant Factory. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Xu, D.; Ma, J.; Chen, Y.; Fu, Z. Growth Monitoring of Greenhouse Lettuce Based on a Convolutional Neural Network. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 124. [Google Scholar]
- Malabanan, J.A.B.; Buenventura, V.A.N.; Domondon, J.Y.F.; Canada, L.A.; Rosales, M.A. Growth Stage Classification on Lettuce Cultivars Using Deep Learning Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), Tokyo, Japan, 14–16 October 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Li, D. CBAM+ ASFF-YOLOXs: An Improved YOLOXs for Guiding Agronomic Operation Based on the Identification of Key Growth Stages of Lettuce. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 203, 107491. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, H.; Dong, M.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, L.; Sui, Y. Research on Precise Phenotype Identification and Growth Prediction of Lettuce Based on Deep Learning. Environ. Res. 2024, 252, 118845. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Chang, S.; Lee, U.; Hong, M.J.; Jo, Y.D.; Kim, J.-B. Lettuce Growth Pattern Analysis Using U-Net Pre-Trained with Arabidopsis. Agriculture 2021, 11, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojo, M.O.; Zahid, A.; Masabni, J.G. Estimating Hydroponic Lettuce Phenotypic Parameters for Efficient Resource Allocation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 218, 108642. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, N.; Liu, Z.; You, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J. Study on Utilizing Mask R-CNN for Phenotypic Estimation of Lettuce’s Growth Status and Optimal Harvest Timing. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, N.; Snider, J.L.; Paterson, A.H.; Virk, G.; Parkash, V.; Roberts, P.; Li, C. Genotypic Variation in Functional Contributors to Yield for a Diverse Collection of Field-Grown Cotton. Crop Sci. 2024, 64, 1846–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Li, C.; Paterson, A.H.; Chee, P.W.; Robertson, J.S. Image Processing Algorithms for Infield Single Cotton Boll Counting and Yield Prediction. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 166, 104976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Fu, R.; Ren, G.; Zhong, R.; Ying, Y.; Lin, T. Automatic Monitoring of Lettuce Fresh Weight by Multi-Modal Fusion Based Deep Learning. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 980581. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, D.; Chen, J.; Li, B.; Ma, J. Improving Lettuce Fresh Weight Estimation Accuracy through RGB-D Fusion. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.; Sun, J.; Song, H.; Li, C. A Customized Density Map Model and Segment Anything Model for Cotton Boll Number, Size, and Yield Prediction in Aerial Images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 232, 110065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Fan, J.; Lu, X.; Wen, W.; Shao, S.; Guo, X.; Zhao, C. Hyperspectral Technique Combined with Deep Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Phenotyping Traits in Lettuce. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 927832. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Z.; Tan, X.; Dai, M.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Kong, D. A Hyperspectral Deep Learning Attention Model for Predicting Lettuce Chlorophyll Content. Plant Methods 2024, 20, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer, A.; Bostrom, A.G.; Ball, J.; Applegate, C.; Cheng, T.; Laycock, S.; Rojas, S.M.; Kirwan, J.; Zhou, J. Combining Computer Vision and Deep Learning to Enable Ultra-Scale Aerial Phenotyping and Precision Agriculture: A Case Study of Lettuce Production. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bauer, A.; Bostrom, A.G.; Ball, J.; Applegate, C.; Cheng, T.; Laycock, S.; Rojas, S.M.; Kirwan, J.; Zhou, J. AirSurf-Lettuce: An Aerial Image Analysis Platform for Ultra-Scale Field Phenotyping and Precision Agriculture Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning. bioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machefer, M.; Lemarchand, F.; Bonnefond, V.; Hitchins, A.; Sidiropoulos, P. Mask R-CNN Refitting Strategy for Plant Counting and Sizing in UAV Imagery. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Li, D. Automatic Counting of Lettuce Using an Improved YOLOv5s with Multiple Lightweight Strategies. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 226, 120220. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, B.; Zhang, J.-L.; Su, W.-H.; Hu, R. A SPH-YOLOv5x-Based Automatic System for Intra-Row Weed Control in Lettuce. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oerke, E.-C. Crop Losses to Pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perotti, V.E.; Larran, A.S.; Palmieri, V.E.; Martinatto, A.K.; Permingeat, H.R. Herbicide Resistant Weeds: A Call to Integrate Conventional Agricultural Practices, Molecular Biology Knowledge and New Technologies. Plant Sci. 2020, 290, 110255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, X.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Song, H. Analysis of the Variability of Pesticide Concentration Downstream of Inline Mixers for Direct Nozzle Injection Systems. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 180, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowmik, P.C. Weed Biology: Importance to Weed Management. Weed Sci. 1997, 45, 349–356. [Google Scholar]
- Osorio, K.; Puerto, A.; Pedraza, C.; Jamaica, D.; Rodríguez, L. A Deep Learning Approach for Weed Detection in Lettuce Crops Using Multispectral Images. AgriEngineering 2020, 2, 471–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.-L.; Su, W.-H.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Peng, Y. SE-YOLOv5x: An Optimized Model Based on Transfer Learning and Visual Attention Mechanism for Identifying and Localizing Weeds and Vegetables. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, R.; Su, W.-H.; Li, J.-L.; Peng, Y. Real-Time Lettuce-Weed Localization and Weed Severity Classification Based on Lightweight YOLO Convolutional Neural Networks for Intelligent Intra-Row Weed Control. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 226, 109404. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.-F.; Tu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Q.; Zhao, C.-T.; Su, W.-H. A Lettpoint-Yolov11l Based Intelligent Robot for Precision Intra-Row Weeds Control in Lettuce. 2025. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5162748 (accessed on 2 April 2025).
- Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, C.; Sun, L. Segmentation Algorithm for Overlap Recognition of Seedling Lettuce and Weeds Based on SVM and Image Blocking. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 201, 107284. [Google Scholar]
- Raja, R.; Nguyen, T.T.; Slaughter, D.C.; Fennimore, S.A. Real-Time Robotic Weed Knife Control System for Tomato and Lettuce Based on Geometric Appearance of Plant Labels. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 194, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, M.; Gao, X.; Wang, G.; Qi, J.; Qu, M.; Ma, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhou, Z.; Song, K. An Application Oriented All-Round Intelligent Weeding Machine with Enhanced YOLOv5. Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 248, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Sigrimis, N.A. Investigation of Strawberry Irrigation Strategy Based on K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Georgieva, T.; Ferentinos, K.; Arvanitis, K.; Sygrimis, N. Sustainable Energy Management of Solar Greenhouses Using Open Weather Data on MACQU Platform. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, H.; Cheng, M.; Pang, S.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Sigrims, N.A. Construction and Performance Experiment of Integrated Water and Fertilization Irrigation Recycling System. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Fu, Q.; Meng, F.; Mei, S.; Wang, J.; Li, L. Optimal Design and Experiment of Fertilizer EC Regulation Based on Subsection Control Algorithm of Fuzzy and PI. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2016, 32, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
- Jarrar, E.; Hasan, A.R.; Alimari, A.; Saleh, M. Water and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Lettuce Plants Cultivated in Soilless Conditions under Different Irrigation Systems. Desalination Water Treat. 2022, 275, 184–195. [Google Scholar]
- Sudkaew, N.; Tantrairatn, S. Foliar Fertilizer Robot for Raised Bed Greenhouse Using NDVI Image Processing System. In Proceedings of the 2021 25th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC), Chiang Rai, Thailand, 18–20 November 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 222–227. [Google Scholar]
- Moraitis, M.; Vaiopoulos, K.; Balafoutis, A.T. Design and Implementation of an Urban Farming Robot. Micromachines 2022, 13, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, C.-L.; Chen, H.-W. Straight-Line Generation Approach Using Deep Learning for Mobile Robot Guidance in Lettuce Fields. In Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Chiba, Japan, 21–25 April 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 187–189. [Google Scholar]
- Flores, E.J.C.; Gonzaga, J.A.; Augusto, G.L.; Chua, J.A.T.; Lim, L.A.G. Deep Learning-Based Vision System for Water Stress Classification of Lettuce in Pot Cultivation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), Coron, Philippines, 19–23 November 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hao, X.; Jia, J.; Gao, W.; Guo, X.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, L.; Wang, M. MFC-CNN: An Automatic Grading Scheme for Light Stress Levels of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Leaves. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105847. [Google Scholar]
- Concepcion, R., II; Lauguico, S.; Almero, V.J.; Dadios, E.; Bandala, A.; Sybingco, E. Lettuce Leaf Water Stress Estimation Based on Thermo-Visible Signatures Using Recurrent Neural Network Optimized by Evolutionary Strategy. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 8th R10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), Kuching, Malaysia, 1–3 December 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wolter-Salas, S.; Canessa, P.; Campos-Vargas, R.; Opazo, M.C.; Sepulveda, R.V.; Aguayo, D. WS-YOLO: An Agronomical and Computer Vision-Based Framework to Detect Drought Stress in Lettuce Seedlings Using IR Imaging and YOLOv8. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability, Madrid, Spain, 18–20 October 2023; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 339–351. [Google Scholar]
- Teshome, F.T.; Bayabil, H.K.; Schaffer, B.; Ampatzidis, Y.; Hoogenboom, G. Improving Soil Moisture Prediction with Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 226, 109414. [Google Scholar]
- Reganold, J.P.; Papendick, R.I.; Parr, J.F. Sustainable Agriculture. Sci. Am. 1990, 262, 112–121. [Google Scholar]
- Velten, S.; Leventon, J.; Jager, N.; Newig, J. What Is Sustainable Agriculture? A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2015, 7, 7833–7865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, G.P. A Sustainable Agriculture? Daedalus 2015, 144, 76–89. [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty, S.P.; Hughes, D.P.; Salathé, M. Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 215232. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Wang, X. Plant Diseases and Pests Detection Based on Deep Learning: A Review. Plant Methods 2021, 17, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grinblat, G.L.; Uzal, L.C.; Larese, M.G.; Granitto, P.M. Deep Learning for Plant Identification Using Vein Morphological Patterns. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 127, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Z. Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Spectral–Spatial Double-Branch Attention Mechanism. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.; Lu, J.; Jiang, H. Tomato Leaf Diseases Classification Based on Leaf Images: A Comparison between Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods. AgriEngineering 2021, 3, 542–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kattenborn, T.; Leitloff, J.; Schiefer, F.; Hinz, S. Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in Vegetation Remote Sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2021, 173, 24–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cravero, A.; Sepúlveda, S. Use and Adaptations of Machine Learning in Big Data—Applications in Real Cases in Agriculture. Electronics 2021, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, M. An Improved YOLOv5-Based Vegetable Disease Detection Method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 202, 107345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Shang, S.; Wang, D.; He, X.; Feng, K.; Zhu, H. Plant Disease Detection and Classification Method Based on the Optimized Lightweight YOLOv5 Model. Agriculture 2022, 12, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajendiran, G.; Rethnaraj, J.; Malaisamy, J. Enhanced CNN Model for Lettuce Disease Identification in Indoor Aeroponic Vertical Farming Systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems (ICSES), Kaski, Nepal, 15–17 October 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1407–1412. [Google Scholar]
- Missio, J.C.; Rivera, A.; Figàs, M.R.; Casanova, C.; Camí, B.; Soler, S.; Simó, J. A Comparison of Landraces vs. Modern Varieties of Lettuce in Organic Farming during the Winter in the Mediterranean Area: An Approach Considering the Viewpoints of Breeders, Consumers, and Farmers. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lages Barbosa, G.; Almeida Gadelha, F.D.; Kublik, N.; Proctor, A.; Reichelm, L.; Weissinger, E.; Wohlleb, G.M.; Halden, R.U. Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2015, 12, 6879–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan Mhya, D.; Mohammed, A. Pesticides’ Impact on the Nutritious and Bioactive Molecules of Green Leafy Vegetables: Spinach and Lettuce. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-Y.; Li, Z.-W.; Yang, C.-H.; Huang, Y.-M. Automatic Path Planning for Spraying Drones Based on Deep Q-Learning. J. Internet Technol. 2023, 24, 565–575. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Peng, F.; Su, J. Design and Research of an Intelligent Pesticide Spraying Robot. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 7th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China, 15–17 September 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; Volume 7, pp. 1907–1911. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez-Ispizua, E.; Calatayud, Á.; Marsal, J.I.; Basile, F.; Cannata, C.; Abdelkhalik, A.; Soler, S.; Valcárcel, J.V.; Martínez-Cuenca, M.-R. Postharvest Changes in the Nutritional Properties of Commercial and Traditional Lettuce Varieties in Relation with Overall Visual Quality. Agronomy 2022, 12, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picon, A.; San-Emeterio, M.G.; Bereciartua-Perez, A.; Klukas, C.; Eggers, T.; Navarra-Mestre, R. Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Multiple Species of Weeds and Corn Crop Using Synthetic and Real Image Datasets. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 194, 106719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gang, M.-S.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, D.-W. Estimation of Greenhouse Lettuce Growth Indices Based on a Two-Stage CNN Using RGB-D Images. Sensors 2022, 22, 5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillén, M.A.; Llanes, A.; Imbernón, B.; Martínez-España, R.; Bueno-Crespo, A.; Cano, J.-C.; Cecilia, J.M. Performance Evaluation of Edge-Computing Platforms for the Prediction of Low Temperatures in Agriculture Using Deep Learning. J. Supercomput. 2021, 77, 818–840. [Google Scholar]
- Reyes, A.K.; Caicedo, J.C.; Camargo, J.E. Fine-Tuning Deep Convolutional Networks for Plant Recognition. In Proceedings of the Working Notes of CLEF 2015—Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, Toulouse, France, 8–11 September 2015; Volume 1391. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, M.; Mei, S. Coupling Technology of OpenSURF and Shannon-Cosine Wavelet Interpolation for Locust Slice Images Inpainting. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107110. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Mei, S.-L. Shannon Wavelet Precision Integration Method for Pathologic Onion Image Segmentation Based on Homotopy Perturbation Technology. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 2014, 601841. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Mei, S. Shannon-Cosine Wavelet Precise Integration Method for Locust Slice Image Mixed Denoising. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 4989735. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, W.; Yang, T.; Zeng, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; You, L.; Liu, Y.; Du, W.; Yang, F.; et al. LettuceDB: An Integrated Multi-Omics Database for Cultivated Lettuce. Database 2024, 2024, baae018. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Z.; Li, B.; Du, J.; Shen, F.; Zhao, Y.; Deng, Y.; Kuang, Z.; Tao, Y.; Wan, M.; Lu, X.; et al. LettuceGDB: The Community Database for Lettuce Genetics and Omics. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cui, K.; Li, R.; Polk, S.L.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, H.; Murphy, J.M.; Plemmons, R.J.; Chan, R.H. Superpixel-Based and Spatially-Regularized Diffusion Learning for Unsupervised Hyperspectral Image Clustering. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 4405818. [Google Scholar]
- Polk, S.L.; Cui, K.; Chan, A.H.; Coomes, D.A.; Plemmons, R.J.; Murphy, J.M. Unsupervised Diffusion and Volume Maximization-Based Clustering of Hyperspectral Images. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, C.; Yang, F.; Huang, D.; Lyu, W. Data-Driven Soft Sensor Development Based on Deep Learning Technique. J. Process Control 2014, 24, 223–233. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Cao, W.; Zhang, F.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Wu, X. A Review of Deep Learning in Multiscale Agricultural Sensing. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, M.; Wei, N.; Dong, J.; Tao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J. Multimodal Data Fusion for Precise Lettuce Phenotype Estimation Using Deep Learning Algorithms. Plants 2024, 13, 3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Nolasco, C.; Padilla-Medina, J.A.; Nolasco, J.J.M.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.G.; Barranco-Gutiérrez, A.I.; Diaz-Carmona, J.J. Non-Invasive Monitoring of the Thermal and Morphometric Characteristics of Lettuce Grown in an Aeroponic System through Multispectral Image System. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Sun, C.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.-F. Hybrid Optimization of Phase Masks: Integrating Non-Iterative Methods with Simulated Annealing and Validation via Tomographic Measurements. Symmetry 2025, 17, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouguettaya, A.; Zarzour, H.; Kechida, A.; Taberkit, A.M. Deep Learning Techniques to Classify Agricultural Crops through UAV Imagery: A Review. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 9511–9536. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, C.; Fan, B.; Li, J.; Feng, Q. Agricultural Robots: Technology Progress, Challenges and Trends. Smart Agric. 2023, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Albahar, M. A Survey on Deep Learning and Its Impact on Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities. Agriculture 2023, 13, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukaegbu, U.F.; Tartibu, L.K.; Okwu, M.O.; Olayode, I.O. Development of a Light-Weight Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Precision Agriculture. Sensors 2021, 21, 4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukaegbu, U.; Tartibu, L.; Okwu, M. An Overview of Deep Learning Hardware Accelerators in Smart Agricultural Applications. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering Conference, Virtual, 5–7 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.-I.; Galindo, M.; Xie, H.; Wong, L.-K.; Shuai, H.-H.; Li, Y.-H.; Cheng, W.-H. Lightweight Deep Learning for Resource-Constrained Environments: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 2024, 56, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Guo, X.; Zhong, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, M. Extracting the Height of Lettuce by Using Neural Networks of Image Recognition in Deep Learning. Authorea Prepr. 2022. Available online: https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/105790/preprint_pdf/e6fc785d5b7ce07b655625a991504e49.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2025).
- Adianggiali, A.; Irawati, I.D.; Hadiyoso, S.; Latip, R. Classification of Nutrient Deficiencies Based on Leaf Image in Hydroponic Lettuce Using MobileNet Architecture. ELKOMIKA J. Tek. Energi Elektr. Tek. Telekomun. Tek. Elektron. 2023, 11, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, K.; Zhu, R.; Wang, M.; Tang, W.; Larsen, G.D.; Pauca, V.P.; Alqahtani, S.; Yang, F.; Segurado, D.; Lutz, D.; et al. Detection and Geographic Localization of Natural Objects in the Wild: A Case Study on Palms. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.13023. [Google Scholar]
- Wan, S.; Zhao, K.; Lu, Z.; Li, J.; Lu, T.; Wang, H. A Modularized IoT Monitoring System with Edge-Computing for Aquaponics. Sensors 2022, 22, 9260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Xu, R.; Li, C.; Munoz, P.; Takeda, F.; Leme, B. In-Field Blueberry Fruit Phenotyping with a MARS-PhenoBot and Customized BerryNet. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 232, 110057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Li, C.; Fu, L. Apple Tree Architectural Trait Phenotyping with Organ-Level Instance Segmentation from Point Cloud. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 229, 109708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, K.; Shao, Z.; Larsen, G.; Pauca, V.; Alqahtani, S.; Segurado, D.; Pinheiro, J.; Wang, M.; Lutz, D.; Plemmons, R.; et al. PalmProbNet: A Probabilistic Approach to Understanding Palm Distributions in Ecuadorian Tropical Forest via Transfer Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Southeast Conference, Marietta, GA, USA, 18–20 April 2024; pp. 272–277. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, H.; Zhao, L.; Yan, J.; Feng, H.-Y. Implementation of Digital Twin in Actual Production: Intelligent Assembly Paradigm for Large-Scale Industrial Equipment. Machines 2023, 11, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type | Methods | Agricultural Applications |
---|---|---|
Supervised or discriminative learning | CNN | Crop health monitoring, lettuce growth stage recognition, and pest and disease detection. |
RNN, LSTM, GRU | Environmental parameter prediction (e.g., temperature, humidity, light variation). | |
DNN | Soil quality assessment and crop yield prediction. | |
Unsupervised or generative learning | GAN | Synthetic crop disease image generation for dataset augmentation. |
VAE | Virtual crop growth stage image generation to enhance deep learning model generalization. | |
DBN, RBM | Soil composition analysis and unsupervised pest and disease classification. | |
Hybrid learning | CNN + LSTM | Integration of image and environmental data for lettuce growth monitoring and yield prediction. |
AE + CNN | Autonomous farm monitoring for real-time tracking of lettuce cultivation areas. | |
Transformer | High-precision classification for lettuce growth stage recognition. |
Research Direction | Main Methodology | Key Results | References |
---|---|---|---|
Pest and Disease Diagnosis | YOLOv5, YOLOv8, EfficientNet-v2s |
| [54,58,60,61,62,63] |
CNN, VGG16, MobileNet | |||
Migration Learning, Data Enhancement | |||
Precision Spraying | YOLOv5 + multi-target tracking (LettuceTrack) |
| [65,66] |
VGG16 combines disease identification with pesticide recommendation | |||
Pesticide Residue Detection | SVM, LDA |
| [67,68,69,70,71,72] |
NIR spectroscopy + Deep Belief Networks (DBN) | |||
Visible-NIR hyperspectral imaging + SAE-LSSVR | |||
CNN trained pesticide residue detection model |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qin, Y.-M.; Tu, Y.-H.; Li, T.; Ni, Y.; Wang, R.-F.; Wang, H. Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073190
Qin Y-M, Tu Y-H, Li T, Ni Y, Wang R-F, Wang H. Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation. Sustainability. 2025; 17(7):3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073190
Chicago/Turabian StyleQin, Yi-Ming, Yu-Hao Tu, Tao Li, Yao Ni, Rui-Feng Wang, and Haihua Wang. 2025. "Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation" Sustainability 17, no. 7: 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073190
APA StyleQin, Y.-M., Tu, Y.-H., Li, T., Ni, Y., Wang, R.-F., & Wang, H. (2025). Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation. Sustainability, 17(7), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073190