Next Article in Journal
Economic Potential of Algae Biostimulant for Sustainable Agriculture in the Baltic Sea Region: Impact of Furcellaria lumbricalis Digestate Extract on Basil Growth Promotion
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Impact of Polycentric City Network on Economic Growth in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Environmental Social and Governance Performance on Systematic Tail Risk of Chinese Corporations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis

by
Erasmia Angelaki
,
Alexandros Garefalakis
,
Markos Kourgiantakis
,
Ioannis Sitzimis
and
Ioannis Passas
*
Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(7), 3266; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073266
Submission received: 13 February 2025 / Revised: 2 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Governance: ESG Practices in the Modern Corporation)

Abstract

:
As businesses increasingly prioritize sustainability, integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles with green computing has emerged as a critical strategy. However, research remains fragmented regarding how these two domains interact within the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 750 articles published between 2004 and 2024, using multiple correspondence and co-citation analyses to identify key trends. The findings highlight a strong correlation between green computing practices and improved economic outcomes. The results indicate that China and the United States lead research output in this field, with a significant rise in publications post-2018, driven by regulatory pressures and corporate sustainable initiatives. Our findings emphasize that companies integrating green computing with ESG strategies can achieve long-term financial sustainability while meeting environmental and social responsibilities. This study provides insights from business leaders, policymakers, and researchers by identifying critical gaps and future research directions, including industry-specific applications and policy frameworks to accelerate ESG adoption in technology-driven enterprises. Future research should address practical challenges in implementing these practices across different industries and explore the long-term impacts of ESG integration on business performance.

1. Introduction

The intersection of digital technology, information systems, and green computing has created a dynamic environment for contemporary businesses. As organizations increasingly prioritize sustainability, integrating ESG criteria has emerged as a focal point. This shift is particularly significant with the advent of the TBL business model, which incorporates economic considerations alongside social and environmental aspects [1,2]. Simultaneously, green computing, a field focusing on reducing the environmental footprint on Information Technology (IT), has emerged as a critical tool for achieving sustainable corporate practices [3,4]. Digital technologies enhance green innovation performance through green technology upgrading, cost reduction, and optimized resource allocation, while the convergence of ESG and green computing creates opportunities to improve resource efficiency, strengthen corporate governance, and promote social responsibility while sustaining economic growth [5,6].
The TBL framework introduced by Elkington [7] provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating corporate success by considering economic, environmental, and social dimensions. Traditional business models prioritize financial performance, but the rising urgency of climate change, energy consumption, and regulatory compliance has necessitated a broader focus on sustainability [8,9]. Within this framework, green computing plays a pivotal role by reducing energy consumption, minimizing e-waste, and enhancing IT system efficiency [6,10]. Additionally, digital transformation has a greater impact on driving green technology innovation in state-owned and large-scale enterprises, with advanced digital technologies such as cloud computing, blockchain, and artificial intelligence being leveraged to improve ESG reporting, track carbon emissions, and develop energy-efficient computing infrastructures [11,12].
Despite the growing interest in ESG and green computing, research remains fragmented, with studies often addressing these areas separately. While the existing literature explores the economic benefits of ESG adoption [8] and the environmental impact of IT systems [11,13], there is limited analysis of how green computing aligns with the ESG principles within the TBL framework. Understanding this relationship is crucial, as businesses seek strategies to enhance sustainability, comply with environmental policies, and maintain profitability [12,14].
This study aims to bridge the gap by conducting a bibliometric analysis of 750 articles published between 2004 and 2024, focusing on key research trends, co-citation networks, and emerging key themes in ESG and green computing. Using VOSviewer 1.6.20 and Biblioshiny, we identify the most influential publications, key geographical contributors, and evolving research themes. The findings reveal that China and the United States lead global research output, with a sharp increase in publications post-2018, coinciding with stronger environmental regulations and corporate sustainability initiatives [12,15].
The current paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides a comprehensive literature review, discussing prior research on ESG integration, green computing, and the TBL framework. Section 3 outlines the methodology, detailing the bibliometric approach, data collection process, and the analytical techniques used in this study. Section 4 presents the results and key findings, including co-citation analysis, keyword clustering, and geographical research trends. Section 5 offers a discussion of the findings, linking them to theoretical perspectives and practical implications. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper by summarizing key contributions, highlighting study limitations, and suggesting future research directions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. ESG and Green Computing

The rapid growth of digital technologies has significantly influenced global sustainability efforts, leading to the emergence of green computing—a field focused on reducing the environmental footprint of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems [8]. Green computing encompasses several strategies, including energy-efficient hardware, optimized software algorithms, virtualization, and sustainable data center management [3,16]. These approaches aim to reduce carbon emissions, minimize electronic waste, and improve resource efficiency in IT infrastructures. As businesses and industries worldwide move toward net-zero emissions goals, integrating green IT solutions into corporate sustainability strategies has become not only an environmental necessity but also a financial and regulatory imperative [3].
Simultaneously, ESG criteria have emerged as a critical framework for corporate sustainability, guiding organizations toward responsible environmental practices, ethical governance structures, and socially inclusive policies [16,17]. ESG frameworks have gained prominence due to increasing regulatory pressures, investor demands, and shifting consumer preferences toward environmentally responsible businesses [18,19]. International agreements such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Climate Accord have further reinforced the need for businesses to align their operational strategies with ESG and green computing principles [20,21].

Evolution of Green Computing in ESG Context

Green computing has evolved from a niche concern into a strategic corporate priority, particularly as energy-intensive industries seek to reduce their carbon footprints. Early discussions on sustainable IT practices focused primarily on hardware efficiency and power-saving mechanisms, emphasizing improvements in processor efficiency, low-power computing devices, and energy-conscious software development [22]. However, with the rise of big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain technologies, the scope of green computing has expanded to include sustainable software development, circular economy principles, and AI-driven ESG tracking systems [23,24].
One of the most significant advancements in green computing has been the development and widespread adoption of cloud computing, which enables businesses to reduce reliance on physical infrastructure, optimize server usage, and minimize overall energy consumption [25]. Major cloud service providers such as Amazon Web Services (AWSs), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud have committed to achieving carbon neutrality by investing in renewable energy-powered data centers [26]. Similarly, innovations in edge computing have enabled companies to process data closer to the source, reducing network energy consumption and enhancing real-time analytics, which is particularly beneficial for industrial applications and Internet of Things ecosystems [27].
In addition to cloud and edge computing, AI-driven energy management systems have further revolutionized green computing by dynamically adjusting IT infrastructure power and usage, predicting workload demands, and automating ESG compliance tracking [28]. These AI-powered solutions allow businesses to optimize their energy consumption while maintaining computational efficiency, demonstrating that green computing is no longer just an environmental initiative but an essential component of an ESG-aligned corporate strategy.

2.2. ESG in Business Sustainability and Green Computing Adoption

Green computing has become an integral part of ESG adoption as companies seek ways to align their technology investments with sustainability goals. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail are increasingly leveraging sustainable computing models to improve efficiency while maintaining ESG compliance [29]. The finance sector, for example, has adopted blockchain technology to enhance ESG tracking, improve supply chain transparency, and facilitate carbon credit verification. Similarly, healthcare organizations are utilizing cloud-based electronic medical records (EMRs) and AI-driven patient monitoring systems to reduce unnecessary data storage and enhance resource efficiency, leading to lower carbon emissions and optimized healthcare operations [26].
From a governance perspective, ESG-aligned green computing policies require organizations to implement responsible e-waste disposal, IT lifecycle management, and regulatory compliance in digital operations [30]. As part of this transition, governments and regulatory bodies have introduced green IT policies aimed at encouraging companies to adopt sustainable digital [31]. In the European Union, the Green Deal and CSRD have introduced strict ESG reporting standards, requiring businesses to disclose their energy consumption and environmental impact across their IT infrastructures [32]. Likewise, China’s Green Data Center Initiative has set ambitious targets to make 80% of IT facilities energy-efficient by 2030 [33]. These policies underscore the increasing role of regulatory frameworks in accelerating green computing adoption within ESG-driven business strategies.
The role of corporate leadership and stakeholder engagement is also critical in ensuring the success of green computing initiatives. Many companies are incorporating sustainable objectives into their corporate governance frameworks, linking executive compensation to ESG performance metrics and publishing annual sustainability reports detailing their IT energy consumption, carbon reduction strategies, and environmental impact [10,34,35]. These efforts demonstrate that green computing is not only an operational shift but also a governance commitment that requires active involvement from business leaders, policymakers, and investors.

2.3. Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite the rapid development of green computing and ESG integration, several challenges remain unaddressed. One of the primary challenges is the lack of standardized ESG measurement frameworks for IT sustainability. Many companies struggle to quantify the direct impact of their IT operations on ESG goals due to the absence of universally accepted key performance indicators (KPIs) [36]. While sustainability reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) provide some guidelines, they do not specifically account for the complexity of green computing initiatives in different industries.
Another major challenge is the implementation barriers faced by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). While large corporations have the financial and technological resources to adopt sustainable computing models, SMEs often lack access to cost-effective green computing solutions and face difficulties in securing funding for energy-efficient IT infrastructure [37]. Additionally, the cost–benefit analysis of green computing remains unclear for many organizations, particularly in industries where IT operations are not the primary driver of business performance.
Furthermore, cybersecurity risks associated with sustainable IT infrastructure present an emerging concern. As companies increasingly rely on cloud-based and decentralized computing systems for ESG tracking and reporting, they become more vulnerable to cyber threats and data breaches [38]. Strengthening data protection measures while ensuring sustainable IT infrastructure remains cost-effective will require future research into advanced encryption, decentralized cloud security protocols, and AI-driven threat detection for ESG-related IT ecosystems.
Given these challenges, future research should focus on developing ESG metrics that integrate green computing indicators for standardized reporting. Additionally, further studies should explore AI-driven solutions for automated ESG compliance and sustainability tracking, enabling businesses to monitor their environmental impact in real time. Longitudinal studies assessing the long-term economic impact of sustainable computing investments across different industries would also provide valuable insights for corporate decision-making.
As ESG regulations continue to evolve, businesses must proactively embrace green IT innovations to maintain regulatory compliance, improve operational efficiency, and enhance long-term sustainability performance [15]. By leveraging the latest advancements in AI, blockchain, and cloud computing, organizations can integrate green computing into their ESG strategies, ensuring both environmental responsibility and financial resilience in an increasingly sustainability-driven global economy.

3. Methodology

Bibliometric analysis methods were employed to synthesize the existing literature, leveraging data from the Scopus database [29]. Bibliometric research involves quantitative and statistical techniques applied to bibliographic data [34,35,39]. This includes methods such as descriptive statistical analysis, performance and cluster analysis, and science mapping. Performance mapping measures publication and citation-related variables, while science mapping examines the impact and relationships among various article attributes, such as co-occurrence weight and total strength [40,41,42]. Techniques like citation analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, keyword, and co-authorship analysis were utilized in this research.
Given the fragmented nature of existing studies, this approach allows for a structured synthesis of key contributions, identifying thematic trends, co-citation networks, and influential research clusters. The bibliometric method is particularly relevant for understanding how ESG principles and green IT have evolved over time, as it enables the visualization of scholarly discourse and research impact. To ensure a rigorous analysis, we employed a systematic literature review (SLR) framework, which involved defining clear inclusion criteria, conducting database searches using Scopus, and applying advanced bibliometric techniques such as keyword co-occurrence analysis and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) [43,44]. This methodology provides a comprehensive and replicable foundation for assessing the development of ESG-driven digital strategies. Additionally, we acknowledge the need for stronger alignment between the research question and the conclusions. While our analysis identified three dominant research clusters—corporate ESG strategies, green computing innovations, and regulatory perspectives—we recognize that these themes must be explicitly linked back to the study’s core objective. In response, we have refined our discussion to highlight how these clusters contribute to understanding the broader relationship between ESG and green computing. By situating our findings within the TBL framework, we illustrate how ESG-oriented digital innovations drive sustainable business practices, align with regulatory pressures, and create value across economic, environmental, and social dimensions.
Data for this study were retrieved from the Scopus database in May 2024. Established in 2004, Scopus is an international bibliographic database providing abstracts and citations for academic publications from reputable scientific journals. It includes over 36,377 papers from 11,628 publishers and 34,346 peer-reviewed journals in science, technology, medicine, humanities, arts, and social sciences [34].
The search of the Scopus database using terms such as “ESG”, “Triple Bottom Line”, and “business development” yielded 53 initial results. The final search formula was as follows: (“ESG performance” OR “sustainability”) AND (“green computing” OR “sustainable computing” OR “green IT”) AND (“triple bottom line” OR “TBL” OR “sustainable development”). This resulted in 750 articles. For data visualization and analysis, covering publications from 2004 to 2024, we utilized VOSviewer and Biblioshiny, as Figure 1 shows.

4. Results

4.1. Evolution of Numbers of Articles

Figure 2 illustrates the annual scientific production related to the subject area studied from 2004 to 2024, based on 750 articles. The data reveal an overall upward trend in publications annually, indicating growing interest and research activity in these fields. From 2004 to 2008, the number of articles was relatively low, starting near zero, reflecting the nascent stage of ESG awareness, which gained prominence following the UN Global Compact’s “Who Cares Wins” report in 2004 [45]. The integration of ESG and green computing began to gain momentum around 2010, driven by increasing recognition of sustainable business practices and stakeholder pressure for environmental and social accountability [46].
A noticeable increase in publications occurred around 2008, peaking in 2011, attributed to heightened awareness and rigorous research efforts in sustainability and green computing. The global economic crisis of 2007–2009 further underscored the importance of corporate sustainability, leading to increased scholarly attention [38].
From 2018 onwards, there was a significant rise in article production, peaking in 2022. This surge reflects the global emphasis on sustainability, environmental regulation, and integrating ESG principles into corporate strategies. Research highlights, such as those by [15], demonstrate that ESG performance significantly impacts green innovation, particularly in the Chinese industrial sector, enhancing green innovation by alleviating financial constraints and improving human capital. The peak in 2023 aligns with the heightened focus on sustainable development and the creation of the TBL project, which is critical for assessing nations’ economic development beyond traditional economic measures [3].
Figure 3 depicts multiple color-coded clusters that indicate distinct thematic areas. In the central part of the network, larger nodes such as MIS Quarterly, Sustainability, and IEEE Access suggest that these are among the most influential journals in this research domain. Their prominence in the visualization indicates frequent co-citation, meaning they are often referenced together in the literature. The presence of the Journal of Cleaner Production and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews within the same cluster suggests a strong focus on environmental sustainability and corporate green computing initiatives. The right side of the visualization, where Science, Environmental Science & Technology and Energy Policy appear, reflects an emphasis on environmental science and policy-driven research. These nodes are connected to others within the network, indicating that ESG and green computing discussions are linked to broader scientific and regulatory frameworks. The upper section of the network, featuring Computers & Chemical Engineering and Annals of Operations Research, suggests an intersection between green computing and industrial applications, particularly in engineering and technical fields. The visualization also suggests strong collaboration between technological, environmental, and business-oriented journals, reinforcing the argument that sustainability in IT is not just an environmental issue but also a business and governance concern. The linkages between clusters further suggest that research on green computing and ESG is not isolated but integrated with broader technological advancements, policy initiatives, and sustainability goals. This structure indicates that while research in this area has distinct subfields, there is also significant overlap, supporting the idea that sustainable computing is a multifaceted issue that requires contributions from various academic disciplines.

4.2. Geographical Collaboration Analysis

Figure 4 presents the global distribution of scientific publications related to ESG and green computing, emphasizing their contributions to the TBL. The data show that the USA is leading with 401 documents, reflecting a strong focus on sustainability and technological innovation. Studies by [31,32] highlight the significance of transparent ESG practices in enhancing performance and economic development. Other key contributors include China, demonstrating broad international engagement in integrating ESG principles and green computing for enhanced performance. Min-Jae Lee’s research underscores the impact of ESG and green computing on the TBL of Chinese companies [31].
India also emerges as a key contributor to research on ESG and green computing. The bibliometric analysis highlights India’s growing research activity in sustainable computing, renewable energy integration, and ESG-driven technological advancements. Indian institutions and researchers have actively participated in global collaborations, contributing to the development of sustainability-focused digital transformation strategies. This increasing presence underscores India’s role in shaping discussions on ESG adoption and green IT solutions, positioning the country as a significant player in the global sustainability research landscape.
Figure 5 illustrates the regional collaboration among experts on the research topic of how ESG and green mapping boost the TBL, which Biblioshiny created. Brown lines crisscross the map, connecting various countries and representing collaborative links between them. The density and number of these lines indicate the extent and strength of these collaborative relationships. The United States stands out as a central hub for international research collaboration, with numerous lines extending mostly to Europe and China. European countries also display dense interconnections, suggesting strong international collaboration.

4.3. Keyword Analysis

The author keyword analysis helps researchers and research engines locate relevant publications. This analysis can boost the paper’s readership and citations, reveal research trends, and identify gaps [39]. Figure 6 shows the Word Treemap with the top 50 keywords in ESG and green computing research from 2004 to 2024. “Sustainable development” dominates the map with 717 occurrences (19%), reflecting its central role in research. The TBL framework emphasizes sustainability in value-creation activities, boosting economic growth and competitiveness [47,48,49].
Moreover, the critical role of sustainability and green computing and their impact on the TBL is highlighted in Figure 7. This figure highlights the co-occurrence of author keywords. We used VOSviewer to create and visualize the bibliometric networks. Each circle represents keyword occurrences, with larger circles indicating higher co-occurrence. Keywords are organized into clusters which indicate their connections. The articles’ similar colors denote keyword clusters, while the line linking the circles shows keyword relationships. A total of 86 were separated into 7 clusters, each with a distinct hue. Yellow and purple clusters represent green IT and data center-related terms and suggest a focus on the intersection of IT and sustainability practices, exploring how IT can be leveraged to achieve environmental goals. The light blue and green clusters are related to energy efficiency terms and emphasize optimizing energy use, improving efficiency, and integrating renewable energy sources within various technologies. Red and orange clusters represent environmental impact and measurement-related items. Finally, the blue cluster includes sustainability-related terms and focuses on designing, developing, and managing software in the most environmentally friendly way possible.
Figure 8 shows the research themes derived from the bibliometric analysis. The map is divided into four quadrants. Motor themes (upper right) are well developed and highly relevant. Basic themes (lower right) are foundational but underdeveloped. Niche themes (upper left) are specialized but not central. Though not yet fully developed, these themes are foundational and essential to the field. In the map, themes of “sustainable development”, “green computing”, and “energy efficiency” are positioned in this field, emphasizing their core importance but indicating the need for further research and development to fully integrate them into research. According to [50,51], there will be many studies on green computing and its impact on sustainable development.
Finally, Figure 9 illustrates the findings of the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) performed using VOSviewer software. Keywords close together are more related, with a red polygon indicating significant relationships. Keywords like “Internet of Things”, “renewable energy resources”, and “sustainable computing” are clustered together, suggesting that they frequently co-occur. Technological keywords like “cloud computing”, “data centers”, “information technology”, and “software engineering” are interrelated in the context of sustainable practices and green IT. Energy efficiency is a key focus for creating sustainable networks, with computing technology enhancing performance computing and storage solutions [52]. The two main dimensions, Dim 1 and Dim 2, represent latent factors that differentiate research themes based on their co-occurrence patterns. Dim 1 primarily captures variations related to technological and policy-driven aspects of green computing and ESG, distinguishing between studies focused on digital innovation and those centered on regulatory frameworks. Dim 2, on the other hand, reflects the level of integration between green computing strategies and corporate ESG initiatives, with higher values indicating stronger links to business sustainability and financial performance.
By mapping the intellectual structure of this research field, the MCA visualization provides valuable insights into the dominant themes and emerging trends in ESG and green computing studies. It underscores the multidimensional nature of sustainability research, highlighting the convergence of technological advancements, corporate strategies, and regulatory frameworks. This analysis reinforces the study’s findings that ESG-driven digital transformation is not only a technical innovation but also a strategic imperative shaping modern business and environmental policies.

5. Discussion

The results of this study indicate a clear upward trend in research on ESG and green computing, reflecting the growing corporate and regulatory emphasis on sustainability-driven digital transformation. The increase in annual publications, particularly after 2015, suggests that ESG integration and sustainable IT practices have become mainstream topics in academic research and business policies.
The most influential studies identified in this analysis provide a strong foundation for understanding the intersection of ESG and green computing. Research by [19,20] highlights the environmental benefits of AI-powered energy optimization and cloud computing, while works by [13] emphasize the financial and governance aspects of ESG-aligned IT strategies. These findings align with the argument that green computing is no longer a purely technical concern but a fundamental component of corporate ESG strategies.
The keyword co-occurrence analysis reveals that corporate social responsibility (CSR), energy efficiency, and regulatory compliance are among the most frequently studied topics in ESG and green computing research. This study investigates the intersection of ESG integration and green computing through a bibliometric and systematic literature review, with the aim of mapping research trends, identifying thematic clusters, and assessing how these domains contribute to sustainable business practices. While the bibliometric analysis identified three dominant research clusters—corporate ESG strategies, green computing innovations, and regulatory perspectives—these findings must be explicitly tied to the study’s central research question of how ESG and green computing interact within the TBL framework.
To ensure alignment, we refine the scope of our study by emphasizing that these three clusters represent the key mechanisms through which ESG and green computing are operationalized in business and policy contexts. Corporate ESG strategies illustrate how organizations integrate sustainable IT practices into their governance and investment frameworks, directly influencing financial and operational performance. Green computing innovations highlight the technological advancements that drive energy efficiency, emissions reduction, and IT resource optimization, reinforcing the environmental component of the TBL. Finally, regulatory perspectives contextualize the role of global policies, compliance requirements, and sustainability reporting mandates in shaping corporate behavior. Together, these clusters provide a comprehensive response to our research question by demonstrating that ESG-driven green computing is not a standalone phenomenon but an integrated approach to achieving corporate sustainability.
This suggests that organizations are not only focused on adopting greener IT solutions but also ensuring that these solutions align with broader ESG goals, financial performance, and compliance requirements. These findings are consistent with prior studies demonstrating that companies integrating ESG-focused IT governance outperform those that do not in terms of risk management and investor confidence [53].
The geographical analysis shows that China and the United States dominate research output, likely due to the strong policy support and high corporate investment in sustainable IT infrastructure in these regions. While lower in volume, European contributions reflect a policy-driven approach where stringent regulatory requirements influence research focus areas. The collaboration networks indicate the growing globalization of ESG and green computing research, reinforcing the need for cross-border cooperation in sustainable digital transformation.
Despite these advances, there are still gaps in ESG and green computing research. The results suggest that while environmental and governance-related themes are well explored, there is less emphasis on social sustainability aspects, such as ethical sourcing in IT hardware, labor conditions in supply chains, and digital inclusivity. Addressing these gaps will be crucial for advancing a more holistic ESG-driven approach to sustainable computing.

6. Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the ESG integration and green computing research landscape over the past two decades, highlighting key trends, influential contributions, and thematic clusters. The results indicate that research in this field has experienced substantial growth, particularly since 2015, reflecting the increasing corporate and regulatory focus on sustainable IT practices. The analysis of citation patterns and co-occurrence networks reveals that energy efficiency, ESG governance, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are among the most frequently explored topics, underscoring the role of green computing as a fundamental component of ESG strategies.
The keyword analysis identified three major research clusters: corporate ESG strategies, green computing innovations, and regulatory perspectives. The first cluster focuses on integrating ESG frameworks into business models and IT governance, highlighting how organizations align their digital transformation efforts with sustainability goals. The second cluster examines technological advancements in green computing, including AI-driven energy management systems, cloud computing efficiency, and sustainable IT infrastructures. The third cluster pertains to government regulations and policy frameworks, crucial in shaping corporate sustainability initiatives. The geographical analysis further reveals that China, the United States, and Europe dominate the research output, with notable collaborations among leading institutions such as Tsinghua University, MIT, and Cambridge University.
The findings of this study reinforce the argument that green computing is no longer just technical innovation but a strategic imperative for businesses and policymakers. The alignment of sustainable IT solutions with ESG principles enhances financial performance, reduces environmental impact, and improves corporate governance standards. Organizations that adopt energy-efficient IT infrastructures and transparent ESG reporting mechanisms gain a competitive advantage as investors and stakeholders increasingly prioritize sustainability metrics in decision-making. Moreover, regulatory frameworks such as the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) drive corporations toward greater accountability in ESG implementation, further solidifying the need for green IT governance [38].
Despite these achievements, this study also identifies significant research gaps warranting further investigation. While much of the existing literature focuses on environmental and governance aspects of ESG, there is relatively less emphasis on the social dimension, particularly in areas such as ethical sourcing of IT components, digital inclusivity, and labor rights in technology manufacturing. Future research should explore how green computing can contribute to social equity, particularly in emerging economies with limited access to sustainable digital infrastructure. Additionally, the economic impact of green computing on SMEs is an underexplored area that deserves further study.
This study acknowledges the limitations of bibliometric analysis, particularly in capturing the qualitative dimensions of ESG integration in IT governance. Bibliometric techniques rely on quantitative citation-based metrics, which may not fully reflect the practical impact of green computing initiatives on businesses and society. Future studies could complement bibliometric findings with qualitative methodologies, expert interviews, and case studies to provide a more holistic understanding of the field. Expanding the dataset to include multiple bibliographic sources, such as Web of Science and IEEE Xplore, would also enhance the scope and reliability of future bibliometric analyses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A. and A.G.; methodology, E.A. and I.P.; software, E.A. and I.P.; validation, M.K., E.A., I.P., and I.S.; formal analysis, E.A., M.K., and I.S.; investigation, A.G. and I.P.; resources, E.A.; data curation, A.G.; writing—original draft, E.A., I.S., I.P., A.G., and M.K.; writing—review and editing, E.A., I.P., and A.G.; visualization, E.A.; supervision, I.P.; project administration, I.P.; funding acquisition, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, M.J.; Pak, A.; Roh, T. The interplay of institutional pressures, digitalization capability, environmental, social, and governance strategy, and triple bottom line performance: A moderated mediation model. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2024, 33, 5247–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vortelinos, D.; Passas, I.; Floros, C.; Garefalakis, A. Corporate Social Responsibility and Country Governance: An International Comparative Study Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 2024, 12, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmed, T.; Abdullah, J. A Review of Issues and Challenges to Address the Problem of Implementing Green Computing for Sustainability. Al-Rafidain Eng. J. 2023, 28, 300–311. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheliatsidou, A.; Sariannidis, N.; Garefalakis, A.; Passas, I.; Spinthiropoulos, K. Exploring Attitudes towards Whistleblowing in Relation to Sustainable Municipalities. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hba, R.; El Manouar, A. ICT Green Governance: New generation model based on Corporate Social Responsibility and Green IT. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1701.08714. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Qin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Li, J. A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. J. Bus. Ethics 2000, 23, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nogueira, E.; Gomes, S.; Lopes, J.M. Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6706. [Google Scholar]
  9. Passas, I. Accounting for Integrity: ESG and Financial Disclosures: The Challenge of Internal Fraud in Management Decision-Making; Hellenic Mediterranean University: Chania, Greece, 2023; Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/55359 (accessed on 23 February 2025).
  10. Liu, L. Environmental performance factors: Insights from CSR-linked compensation, committees, disclosure, targets, and board composition. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 2024, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, Z.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, K.; Fu, L.; Song, Y. How Does the Digital Transformation Affect the Carbon Emissions of Manufacturing Enterprises in China? The Perspective of Green Technology Innovation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xue, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation? Sustainability 2022, 14, 7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ragazou, K.; Passas, I.; Garefalakis, A.; Galariotis, E.; Zopounidis, C. Big Data Analytics Applications in Information Management Driving Operational Efficiencies and Decision-Making: Mapping the Field of Knowledge with Bibliometric Analysis Using R. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zopounidis, C.; Garefalakis, A.; Lemonakis, C.; Passas, I. Environmental, social and corporate governance framework for corporate disclosure: A multicriteria dimension analysis approach. Manag. Decis. 2020, 58, 2473–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Liu, Z. Study on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Green Innovation Performance—Evidence from Listed Companies in China A-Shares. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sprague, R.H. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii, 5–8 January 2010; Abstracts and CD-ROM of full papers; IEEE Computer Society Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Passas, I.; Ragazou, K.; Zafeiriou, E.; Garefalakis, A.; Zopounidis, C. ESG Controversies: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis for the Sociopolitical Determinants in EU Firms. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Friede, G.; Busch, T.; Bassen, A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 2015, 5, 210–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ragazou, K.; Passas, I.; Garefalakis, A.; Dimou, I. Investigating the Research Trends on Strategic Ambidexterity, Agility, and Open Innovation in SMEs: Perceptions from Bibliometric Analysis. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, B.X.; Kjaerulf, F.; Turner, S.; Cohen, L.; Donnelly, P.D.; Muggah, R.; Davis, R.; Realini, A.; Kieselbach, B.; MacGregor, L.S.; et al. Transforming Our World: Implementing the 2030 Agenda Through Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. J. Public Health Policy 2016, 37, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stavropoulou, E.; Spinthiropoulos, K.; Ragazou, K.; Papademetriou, C.; Passas, I. Green Balanced Scorecard: A Tool of Sustainable Information Systems for an Energy Efficient Business. Energies 2023, 16, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Clifton, M. Green IT: An Analysis of Eco-Friendly Information Technology Strategies. Int. J. Green Technol. 2019, 5, 65. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bashar, D.A. Review on Sustainable Green Internet of Things and Its application. IRO J. Sustain. Wirel. Syst. 2019, 1, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ragazou, K.; Lemonakis, C.; Passas, I.; Zopounidis, C.; Garefalakis, A. ESG-driven ecopreneur selection in European financial institutions: Entropy and TOPSIS analysis. Manag. Decis. 2024, 63, 1316–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patel, Y.S.; Jaiswal, R.; Misra, R. Deep learning-based multivariate resource utilization prediction for hotspots and coldspots mitigation in green cloud data centers. J. Supercomput. 2022, 78, 5806–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baliga, J.; Ayre, R.; Hinton, K.; Tucker, R.S. Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Paolone, G.; Iachetti, D.; Paesani, R.; Pilotti, F.; Marinelli, M.; Di Felice, P. A Holistic Overview of the Internet of Things Ecosystem. IoT 2022, 3, 398–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Passas, I. The Evolution of ESG: From CSR to ESG 2.0. Encyclopedia 2024, 4, 1711–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Passas, I. Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia 2024, 4, 1014–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yigitcanlar, T.; Mehmood, R.; Corchado, J.M. Green artificial intelligence: Towards an efficient, sustainable and equitable technology for smart cities and futures. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, B.C.; Brooks, D.; van Benthem, A.; Gupta, U.; Hills, G.; Liu, V.; Pierce, B.; Stewart, C.; Strubell, E.; Wei, G.-Y.; et al. Carbon Connect: An Ecosystem for Sustainable Computing. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.13858. [Google Scholar]
  32. Celli, M.; Arduini, S.; Beck, T. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and His Future Application Scenario for Italian SMEs. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2024, 19, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, G.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wang, S.; Huang, K.; Zhao, N.; Di, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, Z. China’s green data center development:Policies and carbon reduction technology path. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ragazou, K.; Passas, I.; Sklavos, G. Investigating the Strategic Role of Digital Transformation Path of SMEs in the Era of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Petropoulou, A.; Angelaki, E.; Rompogiannakis, I.; Passas, I.; Garefalakis, A.; Thanasas, G. Digital Transformation in SMEs: Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Era: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2024, 16, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rastogi, S.; Singh, K. The impact of ESG on the bank valuation: Evidence of moderation by ICT. J. Glob. Responsib. 2023, 14, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alsayegh, M.F.; Rahman, R.A.; Homayoun, S. Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chopra, S.S.; Senadheera, S.S.; Dissanayake, P.D.; Withana, P.A.; Chib, R.; Rhee, J.H.; Ok, Y.S. Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, B.; Bu, Y.; Huang, W.B. Document- and Keyword-based Author Co-citation Analysis. Data Inf. Manag. 2018, 2, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, D.; Breslin, D.; Callahan, J.L.; Iszatt-White, M. Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2022, 24, 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kirby, A. Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool. Publications 2023, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ellili, N.O.D. Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 8183–8209. [Google Scholar]
  44. Adeabah, D.; Abakah, E.J.A.; Tiwari, A.K.; Hammoudeh, S. How far have we come and where should we go after 30+ years of research on Africa’s emerging financial markets? A systematic review and a bibliometric network analysis. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 2023, 55, 101030. [Google Scholar]
  45. United Nations. The Global Compact. Who Cares Wins: Connecting the Financial Markets to a Changing World? 2004. Available online: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  46. Marcucci, G.; Ciarapica, F.; Poler, R.; Sanchis, R. A bibliometric analysis of the emerging trends in silver economy. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 936–941. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ahmad, S.; Mishra, S.; Sharma, V. Green computing for sustainable future technologies and its applications. In Contemporary Studies of Risks in Emerging Technology, Part A; Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.: Bingley, UK, 2023; pp. 241–256. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yun, G.; Yalcin, M.G.; Hales, D.N.; Kwon, H.Y. Interactions in sustainable supply chain management: A framework review. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2019, 30, 140–173. [Google Scholar]
  49. Onofrei, G.; Nguyen, H.; Yang, Y.; Filieri, R. Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Triple Bottom Line: Does Supply Chain Learning Matter? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 10054–10065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dissanayake, K.; Pal, R. Sustainability dichotomies of used clothes supply chains: A critical review of key concerns and strategic resources. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2023, 34, 75–97. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dicuonzo, G.; Donofrio, F.; Ranaldo, S.; Dell’Atti, V. The effect of innovation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices. Meditari Account. Res. 2022, 30, 1191–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ferrigno, G.; Crupi, A.; Di Minin, A.; Ritala, P. 50+ years of R&D Management: A retrospective synthesis and new research trajectories. R D Manag. 2023, 53, 900–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alsharif, M.H.; Kelechi, A.H.; Jahid, A.; Kannadasan, R.; Singla, M.K.; Gupta, J.; Geem, Z.W. A comprehensive survey of energy-efficient computing to enable sustainable massive IoT networks. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 91, 12–29. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flow of methodology.
Figure 1. Flow of methodology.
Sustainability 17 03266 g001
Figure 2. Annual production of scientific research on green computing and ESG by Biblioshiny.
Figure 2. Annual production of scientific research on green computing and ESG by Biblioshiny.
Sustainability 17 03266 g002
Figure 3. Co-citation analysis map of key publications on ESG, green computing, and their contribution to the TBL using VOSviewer.
Figure 3. Co-citation analysis map of key publications on ESG, green computing, and their contribution to the TBL using VOSviewer.
Sustainability 17 03266 g003
Figure 4. Scientific output of leading countries related to green computing and ESG contributions to TBL, created using Biblioshiny.
Figure 4. Scientific output of leading countries related to green computing and ESG contributions to TBL, created using Biblioshiny.
Sustainability 17 03266 g004
Figure 5. Map of country collaborations created by using Biblioshiny.
Figure 5. Map of country collaborations created by using Biblioshiny.
Sustainability 17 03266 g005
Figure 6. Word TreeMap created by using Biblioshiny.
Figure 6. Word TreeMap created by using Biblioshiny.
Sustainability 17 03266 g006
Figure 7. Visualization of co-occurrence of author keywords by using VOSviewer software.
Figure 7. Visualization of co-occurrence of author keywords by using VOSviewer software.
Sustainability 17 03266 g007
Figure 8. Research themes derived from bibliometric analysis.
Figure 8. Research themes derived from bibliometric analysis.
Sustainability 17 03266 g008
Figure 9. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) using VOS viewer.
Figure 9. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) using VOS viewer.
Sustainability 17 03266 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Angelaki, E.; Garefalakis, A.; Kourgiantakis, M.; Sitzimis, I.; Passas, I. ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073266

AMA Style

Angelaki E, Garefalakis A, Kourgiantakis M, Sitzimis I, Passas I. ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2025; 17(7):3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Angelaki, Erasmia, Alexandros Garefalakis, Markos Kourgiantakis, Ioannis Sitzimis, and Ioannis Passas. 2025. "ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis" Sustainability 17, no. 7: 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073266

APA Style

Angelaki, E., Garefalakis, A., Kourgiantakis, M., Sitzimis, I., & Passas, I. (2025). ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 17(7), 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop