Next Article in Journal
Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of the Port of Sines: Contribution to Maritime Transport Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Re-Estimating China’s Cotton Green Production Efficiency with Climate Factors: An Empirical Analysis Using County-Level Panel Data from Xinjiang
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying the Main Urban Density Factors and Their Heterogeneous Effects on PM2.5 Concentrations in High-Density Historic Neighborhoods from a Social-Biophysical Perspective: A Case Study in Beijing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Trends, and Climate Effects

1
School of Geographic Science and Tourism, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China
2
College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
3
Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3381; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083381
Submission received: 2 March 2025 / Revised: 2 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 10 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
During the South Asian Summer Monsoon (SASM), intense large-scale uplift and strong deep convective activity over South Asia lead to the formation of a high aerosol concentration zone in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS), known as the Asian Troposphere Aerosol Layer (ATAL), which appears from June to August. ATAL not only influences the exchange processes of material and energy between the troposphere and stratosphere, but also affects the global climate by altering radiation, cloud formation, and precipitation processes. Therefore, examining the spatiotemporal distribution and climate impacts of ATAL is essential for understanding climate change and evaluating the feasibility of geoengineering. This study systematically reviews research progress on the three-dimensional spatiotemporal distribution, trends, sources, and climatic effects of ATAL. Findings reveal a prominent aerosol layer at the top of the Asian troposphere, and the SASM region potentially serving as a critical conduit for constituents of the boundary layer to reach the stratosphere. However, simulated ATAL components differ significantly across models, particularly in terms of vertical distribution patterns. The precise three-dimensional structure and long-term evolution of ATAL remain unclear, presenting challenges for assessing its climate impact. To advance the understanding of the roles of ATAL in climate change, three future research directions are proposed.

1. Introduction

Since the Industrial Revolution, human society has experienced rapid development. The expansion of industrial activities, along with the growth of the transportation and energy sectors, has led to increasingly severe pollution problems [1,2]. Substantial emissions of pollutants have formed aerosols in the atmosphere, which not only harm human health and environmental quality [3,4,5,6], but also play a notable role in the climate system and global climate change [7,8,9,10,11]. The formation, transport, and transformation of aerosols contribute to the occurrence of haze events [12] and are considered significant short-lived climate forcers that contribute to global warming [13,14]. This impact is especially evident in climate-sensitive regions such as the Polar regions and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), where aerosols severely affect the glacial hydrological environment of the QTP and its surrounding areas [15,16].
Anthropogenic aerosols not only lead to severe pollution within the boundary layer, but can also be transported upward into the middle and upper troposphere and even into the stratosphere [17]. These pollutants are then distributed globally through long-range transport, exerting substantial effects on global climate change [18,19,20,21,22,23]. High concentrations of anthropogenic pollutants, such as black carbon aerosols and trace gases, have been detected in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) regions [24].
Rapid economic development in South Asia has significantly worsened regional atmospheric pollution [25,26]. This region lies within the influence of the Asian Summer Monsoon (ASM) and is characterized by a complex surface and unique climatic conditions. In particular, the QTP, with its distinctive terrain, serves as a crucial channel for stratosphere–troposphere exchange and plays a key role in the upward transport of aerosols into the UTLS region [17,27]. The QTP profoundly influences atmospheric circulation through its strong thermal and dynamic effects, leading to a sharp descent of the tropopause along the northern side of the plateau [28,29]. This unique combination of topography and atmospheric circulation facilitates the entrainment of aerosols from the plateau into the UTLS. During the South Asian Summer Monsoon (SASM), strong vertical motions transport surface-level pollutants into the UTLS. The “trapping effect” of the South Asian High leads to the accumulation of these pollutants, effectively forming a central hub for aerosol distribution [30,31].
Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) was discovered in the early 21st century [32]. Subsequent studies have revealed that anthropogenic emissions originating at the surface are transported upward into the UTLS region, where they accumulate to form the ATAL. Aerosols that enter the stratosphere have longer residence times and are more prone to dispersion across larger areas. Through their interaction with ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation, they play a significant role in the Earth’s radiative budget and climate change [33]. Simulations conducted for stratospheric geoengineering using sulfate aerosols or black carbon aerosols have shown that continuous injection of aerosols into the lower stratosphere can lead to significant temperature changes in the UTLS [34,35]. Evidently, the ATAL plays a crucial role in atmospheric circulation, radiation processes, and atmospheric chemistry, exerting a profound influence on the global climate [34,36].
The discovery of the ATAL has attracted considerable research attention, leading to extensive studies on its formation mechanisms and composition. Findings indicate that during the SASM, the combined effects of the South Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone (SASMA) and frequent deep convection, near-surface air is lifted upward, then influenced by the trapping effect of SASMA [37,38,39]. Research on ATAL composition mainly relies on in situ and sounding observations, as well as modeling studies. However, despite substantial efforts to understand its formation and composition, significant discrepancies remain among research findings, and considerable debate persists regarding the specific components of ATAL. Moreover, due to the limited availability of high-altitude observations and the pronounced vertical variability of aerosols, the three-dimensional structure and long-term evolution of ATAL remain poorly understood. Additionally, the reliability of reanalysis data in characterizing the spatiotemporal distribution of ATAL has yet to be validated, contributing to uncertainties regarding its climatic impact [40].
Therefore, it is imperative to clarify the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of ATAL, explore its impact on the global climate, and assess possible future changes in ATAL and its interactions with the climate. Therefore, it is essential to clarify the spatiotemporal distribution of ATAL, examine its impact on the global climate, and assess potential future changes and interactions with the climate system. A deeper understanding of its three-dimensional spatiotemporal distribution and climatic effects is critical for formulating effective emission reduction strategies to mitigate climate change [41]. This study systematically reviews research progress on the three-dimensional spatiotemporal distribution, trends, sources, and climatic effects of ATAL. The purpose of this study is to clarify the mechanisms of formation, spatiotemporal distribution characteristics, and climate impacts of ATAL in both historical and contemporary contexts, highlight current research gaps, and offer directions for future studies. These efforts aim to provide scientific references and data support for predicting and responding to climate change.

2. Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Components of ATAL

In situ observations of upper tropospheric aerosols are typically conducted using aircraft and balloon platforms [40]. Compared to observations in the lower troposphere, these are more challenging due to limited data availability, making the analysis of vertical distribution characteristics more complex [42]. These limitations complicate efforts to study the spatiotemporal distribution of ATAL. Nevertheless, early researchers have identified key features of ATAL. Using Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (SAGE II) satellite data from 1985 to 1993, Li et al. [43] identified a significant aerosol maximum region near 100 hPa during summer, stretching from the Bay of Bengal to the southeastern QTP, providing early evidence for the presence and concentration patterns of ATAL. Kim et al. [44] later confirmed the existence of ATAL through ground-based lidar observations over Lhasa in the summer of 1999, detecting aerosol concentrations significantly higher than background values within the 14–19 km altitude range. This provided direct observational support for ATAL. Zhou et al. [45] subsequently analyzed the vertical distribution and spatiotemporal variation characteristics of aerosols over the QTP using Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) satellite data from 1991 to 2005. They found a peak in aerosol number density near the tropopause, with summer concentrations significantly higher than those in other seasons. This study not only further confirms the existence of ATAL but also reveals its seasonal variation characteristics. These early studies consistently showed that during the SASM, large quantities of aerosols are transported into the upper troposphere, forming ATAL. These findings laid a foundation for subsequent investigations.
ATAL spans a broad geographical area, extending from the eastern Mediterranean to western China, and is primarily observed during summer at altitudes between 12 and 18 km, as initially noted by Vernier et al. [46] (Figure 1). Vernier et al. further emphasized that ATAL forms through mechanisms distinct from those governing the stratospheric aerosol layer, which is typically influenced by volcanic eruptions. In contrast, ATAL is a persistent feature of the Asian summer monsoon that is unrelated to volcanic activity. Numerous studies have since confirmed the existence of ATAL using various datasets. Thomason and Vernier identified ATAL in the SAGE II satellite observations [47], while, Vernier et al. [48] and Yu et al. [49] provided additional validation by conducting in situ soundings in India and China. These observations also pointed to vertical transport channels in the UTLS over the QTP, which were later corroborated by modeling studies. Their analyses revealed that during the SASM, significant vertical distributions of aerosols extend up to 12 km above the tropopause across a wide region, including India, the northern Arabian Sea, the southeastern QTP, and the northern Bay of Bengal.
Satellite remote sensing has allowed many researchers to confirm the presence of ATAL, and subsequent sounding observations have helped elucidate its spatiotemporal variations. However, high-altitude soundings are costly and offer limited spatial and temporal coverage. In contrast, reanalysis data and numerical models provide long-term, high-resolution datasets and are widely used to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution, composition, and radiation effects of ATAL. Wu et al. [50] compared Modern Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis data with CALIPSO observations, and found that MERRA-2 effectively captures the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of ATAL. Liu et al. [17] compared and analyzed the long-term three-dimensional spatiotemporal variation characteristics of ATAL using multi-source (CALIPSO, MERRA-2 and SAGEII) data, indicating that ATAL began forming in the mid-to-late 1990s and intensified until 2010, after which its upward trend plateaued (Figure 2).
In terms of the composition of ATAL, research findings vary considerably due to differences in models, observational methods, and parameters considered. Using the CESM1 model coupled with CARMA, Yu et al. [51] suggested that ATAL primarily consists of secondary organic aerosols, sulfate aerosols, and primary organic aerosols. Fairlie et al. [52], employing the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, highlighted the significant role of nitrate, along with sulfate, ammonium, and organic aerosols, consistent with the earlier findings of Gu et al. [53]. Fadnavis et al. [54] used the ECHAM6-HAM global aerosol-climate model and identified large quantities of carbonaceous aerosols in the ATAL region. Using the ECHAM/MESSy model combined with GMXe, Ma et al. [55] proposed that mineral dust and water-soluble compounds like nitrates and sulfates dominate aerosol types over the QTP. Zhang et al. [56] conducted a comprehensive study integrating experimental and modeling data to characterize ATAL and found that they are primarily submicron in size (mostly ≤ 0.25 µm), with peak number concentrations at the tropopause and notable vertical gradients.
More recently, Bossolasco et al. [57] used the CESM1.2 model coupled with the Community Atmosphere Model 5 (CAM5) and Modal Aerosol Model 7 (MAM7) to simulate the composition and long-term trends of ATAL, revealing a typical “bimodal” vertical distribution structure primarily composed of mineral dust with no significant interannual variation. The discrepancies in these research results stem from various factors. First, diverse models and observational techniques introduce inherent biases in simulation outputs. Second, the composition and spatiotemporal distribution of ATAL are influenced by multiple factors, including atmospheric circulation, climate variability, and anthropogenic emissions. Notably, the dynamic variations in the SASM strongly affects the formation, distribution, and composition of ATAL. Variations in SASM strength and spatial reach, as well as interannual differences in monsoon activity directly influence ATAL characteristics.
Additionally, the SASM exhibits intraseasonal oscillations, particularly between the Iranian Plateau and the QTP, typically on a quasi-biweekly timescale. These fluctuations introduce further uncertainty into the understanding of the composition and spatiotemporal distribution of ATAL. Consequently, despite extensive efforts, substantial uncertainties remain regarding the composition of ATAL, posing challenges for assessing its climate impacts. To improve accuracy in determining the composition, spatiotemporal distribution, and climatic impacts of ATAL, future studies must integrate multiple factors and adopt advanced, high-precision observational technologies, simulation models, and analytical approaches to reduce uncertainty and improve the robustness of research outcomes.

3. Formation Mechanism and Sources of ATAL

The SASM provides a significant pathway for transporting water vapor and atmospheric constituents from the boundary layer to the stratosphere. Both natural and anthropogenic pollutants that ascend through this channel can influence regional and even global climates through a range of atmospheric chemical, physical, and radiative processes. The vertical transport of pollutants during the SASM is primarily governed by the SASMA, which emerges in June and dissipates by September. The SASMA exhibits distinct intra-seasonal variability in its horizontal structure and displays a characteristic bimodal pattern with east–west movement [24]. Satellite observations show that the South Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone or the South Asian High, centered over the QTP, forms a closed circulation region in which the concentrations of atmospheric components can increase or decrease significantly [30]. Gettelman et al. [58], through observations and simulations, demonstrated that water vapor concentrations in the lower tropical stratosphere are approximately 60% higher in the Northern Hemisphere summer compared to winter, with approximately 75% of the water vapor entering the global stratosphere during summer originating from the Asian monsoon region.
Simulations using three-dimensional global chemical transport models further reveal that most pollutants reaching the UTLS region, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), HCN, and CO, are closely linked to SASM-driven transport [24,59]. Additional studies have shown that ATAL concentrations are significantly higher during the monsoon season than during the pre-monsoon period [60,61,62]. Collectively, these findings highlight the central role of the SASM in shaping the composition and distribution of the atmosphere, particularly in the UTLS region, and its subsequent impacts on regional and global climate systems. Numerous researchers have emphasized that the intense upward airflows and deep convection associated with the SASM are key drivers of ATAL formation [31,51,63,64,65]. Vernier et al. [32] highlighted the distinction between the ATAL and stratospheric aerosol layers, noting that the latter are mainly influenced by volcanic eruptions, whereas the ATAL is a stable, recurring feature during the SASM with no apparent volcanic connection.
Consistent evidence from satellite observations and model simulations confirms that the SASM circulation provides an important channel for the upward transport of near-surface pollutants into the stratosphere. The transport pathways of ATAL have also been widely explored among researchers. Due to its significant dynamic lifting capacity, the QTP is often considered a major ATAL transport route [30,61,63,66,67]. Lau et al. [61] emphasized the roles of the Himalaya-Ganges Plain on the southern edge of the QTP and the Sichuan Basin in eastern China as channels for aerosol uplift via deep convection. These findings improve the understanding of atmospheric dynamics during the SASM and highlight the need for continued monitoring to evaluate the impacts of these pollutants on regional and global climate systems.
The formation mechanism of ATAL involves complex interactions among various processes. The “Elevated Heat Pump” (EHP) hypothesis proposed by Lau in 2006 provides an important framework for understanding this mechanism. This hypothesis emphasizes the coupling between the monsoon system and aerosol transport, especially the role of absorptive aerosols such as black carbon and dust. During mixing or encapsulation, these aerosols enhance their absorptive capacity and heat the surrounding atmosphere by absorbing radiation. This heating effect significantly influences the static feedback of atmospheric water vapor. As the SASM intensifies, large volumes of water vapor are transported to the southern slopes of the QTP. Upon encountering the barrier of the QTP, this water vapor is forced upward, resulting in frequent convective activity over northern India and the Himalayan foothills during the early onset of the SASM. These convective processes not only lift water vapor into the UTLS region but also transport substantial quantities of aerosols. Moreover, by absorbing shortwave radiation, aerosols heat the lower and middle layers of the atmosphere. This heating contributes to the development of an inversion layer through dry convection in the mid-to-upper atmosphere, which further promotes the vertical transport of aerosols into the UTLS. Simultaneously, rising warm air masses draw in additional heat and water vapor from the Indian subcontinent, thus facilitating the earlier onset of the SASM.
These interconnected physical and chemical processes jointly contribute to the formation of the ATAL. Notably, the ATAL formation is not only influenced by the monsoon system, aerosol transport, and radiative heating but also by terrain features, atmospheric circulation patterns, and water vapor availability. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the ATAL formation mechanism requires further in-depth and systematic research. Numerous studies have identified India, southwestern China, and southeastern China as major sources of ATAL [52,58,63,65,68,69]. According to the numerical simulation results by Zhang et al. [56], ATAL primarily originates from two key surface sources. The first is the region south of the Himalayas, characterized by intense convective activity capable of vertically transporting near-surface pollutants to UTLS altitudes. The second is the spiral upward motion along isentropic surfaces, which facilitates the transport of aerosols from the upper troposphere to the lower stratosphere within the SASM region. These findings suggest that aerosols present in the upper troposphere across the SASM region may all contribute to the development of ATAL.

4. Climate Effects of the ATAL

As a key factor influencing the radiative budget of the Earth-atmosphere system, cloud formation, and precipitation processes, aerosols exert substantial impacts on the climate system and global change. Moreover, they are among the most uncertain and complex variables at different meteorological scales [70]. The climatic effects of aerosols are typically categorized into two aspects. The first is the direct effect, referring to aerosol–radiation interactions, in which aerosols modify the radiative budget at the surface and in the atmosphere by scattering and absorbing solar radiation [71]. Studies have shown that since the 1960s, surface incident shortwave radiation in China has declined, particularly in the QTP region [72,73]. However, cloud cover has not changed significantly during this period [74]. This trend is primarily attributed to increased pollutant emissions. Different aerosol types affect the radiative budget in different ways. For instance, black carbon, brown carbon, and certain mineral dust particles absorb solar radiation directly [75,76], whereas sulfates, nitrates, and most organic carbon and dust aerosols primarily scatter solar radiation [77,78]. The reduction in surface incident radiation may lead to temperature changes. From 1960 to 1990, as aerosol concentrations increased rapidly in China, most regions experienced rising temperatures. However, in heavily polluted areas such as eastern China, temperatures exhibited a decreasing trend. The overall increase in temperature is closely linked to climate warming. Research suggests that in eastern China, the radiative forcing from increased aerosol concentrations can be several times greater than that from increased CO2 [79]. Nevertheless, aerosols have a much shorter residence time compared to greenhouse gases. Therefore, when considering a longer time frame, China generally exhibits a warming trend. Aerosol-induced changes in radiative forcing can also influence atmospheric stability and circulation patterns [7].
The second aspect of aerosol climatic effects is their role as cloud condensation nuclei, influencing cloud formation and precipitation, also known as the indirect effect of aerosols [80,81,82,83]. Studies have indicated that increased aerosol concentrations alter the energy balance between the Earth’s surface and the atmosphere and impact the global water cycle [84,85]. Ramanathan et al. [86] pointed out that black carbon aerosols, organic carbon, and dust aerosols in the Asian monsoon region contribute to weakened summer monsoon rainfall. However, Lau et al. [76] argued that due to the high surface albedo in the high-altitude regions of the QTP, absorptive aerosols can strengthen the Indian summer monsoon through an intensified heat pump effect. A strong SASM circulation means a strong upward branch of the circulation located in the southern foothills of the QTP. Strong upward movement can transport aerosols near the surface upwards to the UTLS region. These contrasting findings reflect the considerable uncertainty in current research on the climatic effects of aerosols. Given the complexity and variability of aerosol behavior, it is crucial to conduct further research, both experimental and through numerical simulations, to better understand their role in climate change and global environmental systems. Such research would aid in improving our ability to predict and mitigate the potential negative impacts of aerosols on the climate and weather patterns.
Similarly to aerosols in the troposphere, those in the mid-to-upper atmosphere also influence the radiative energy budget by scattering and absorbing solar radiation. Scattering aerosols contribute to atmospheric cooling, whereas absorbing aerosols warm the atmosphere through aerosol-radiation interactions. However, if aerosols exist in the upper atmosphere, especially the absorbing ones, the impacts will be different. For instance, the presence of scattering aerosols at high altitudes is expected to cause cooling at the surface, while absorbing aerosols may induce warming. Furthermore, there are differences between tropospheric aerosols and stratospheric aerosols. Stratospheric aerosols exhibit longer residence times and greater dispersion, significantly affecting the temperatures of the UTLS and altering surface precipitation patterns, thereby affecting regional and global climates [34,35,63]. Additionally, the vertically inhomogeneous distribution of aerosol types creates variability in incoming shortwave and upward surface radiation, posing a significant challenge in studying aerosol radiative effects [87]. This contributes to an estimated uncertainty of 0.5 W m−2 in global radiative forcing [88].
In Central and East Asia, rapid population growth and industrialization have led to increased emissions of tropospheric aerosols and precursors, suggesting that ATAL may continue to intensify. Aerosols within ATAL can be transported into the tropical lower stratosphere via southward airflow on the eastern flank of the SASMA, thereby affecting the global stratospheric aerosol content. Vernier et al. [46] estimated that ATAL caused an average radiative forcing of approximately −0.1 W m−2 at the local atmospheric top between 1996 and 2013. However, variations in aerosol type and study period may yield different results. Gao et al. [71] found that ATAL increased incoming shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere by 0.15 W m−2 and reduced surface incoming shortwave radiation by 0.72 W m−2. Given the complexity and varying impacts of aerosols in different atmospheric layers, further investigation is essential to clarify their behavior and interactions with the environment. This includes understanding how aerosols are transported and transformed, as well as their long-term effects on climate systems. Such research is crucial for improving climate model accuracy and enhancing projections of weather patterns and global temperature trends.
Aerosols such as ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate may serve as ice nuclei, facilitating inhomogeneous ice formation and affecting the radiative properties of cirrus clouds in the upper troposphere [89]. This, in turn, has implications for climate. Satellite data analyses indicate that rising surface pollutant emissions in Asia enhance water vapor flux into the stratosphere during summer [90]. Satellite observations indicate that, compared to cleaner regions, polluted areas at the tropical tropopause exhibit smaller ice particle radii, higher temperatures, and elevated water vapor content within cirrus clouds. Based on these observations, Su et al. [90] speculated that increased aerosol concentrations elevate the ice particle number density in cirrus clouds, reducing their size and prolonging their residence in the upper troposphere. Furthermore, the enhanced radiative heating from increased cirrus cloud cover subsequently raises temperatures near the tropopause, increasing water vapor and promoting upward motion. This process further boosts water vapor flux into the stratosphere, ultimately affecting the global radiative budget.
Conversely, variations in the chemical composition and aerosol concentrations in the UTLS region exert profound influences on near-surface climate through radiative interactions. For instance, interdecadal fluctuations in stratospheric water vapor levels have been shown to significantly affect surface temperatures [91]. This complex interaction between aerosols, clouds, and radiation across atmospheric layers highlights the ongoing need for comprehensive research to understand and predict their cumulative impacts on the global climate.

5. Conclusions and Discussion

The interaction between the stratosphere and troposphere is currently a frontier and hot research area. In recent years, with the increasing availability of satellite observation data and the rapid development of atmospheric chemical climate models, including those addressing stratospheric processes, have significantly enhanced research efforts in this field and yielded important preliminary findings. In the Asian monsoon region, rapid development in countries such as China, India, and Southeast Asia has led to severe tropospheric pollution. The SASM may serve as a crucial pathway for transporting tropospheric pollutants into the stratosphere. By analyzing the distribution, transport and chemical transformation of pollutants, researchers can better understand their effects on the stratosphere and, conversely, how stratospheric processes influence the troposphere. This research is particularly important for advancing the understanding of the global climate system and assessing the impacts of anthropogenic activities. A deeper understanding of stratosphere–troposphere interactions may enhance our ability to predict and mitigate climate change, especially regarding how tropospheric pollution influences the stratosphere and the global radiative balance. In summary, investigating the interaction between the stratosphere and troposphere—especially in the context of tropospheric pollution in the Asian monsoon region—represents a valuable and timely research direction.
To date, most studies have relied heavily on satellite observations and numerical simulations, while in situ observational data from the Asian monsoon region remain limited. Additionally, the performance of satellite-derived products in this region often lacks validation through ground-based or in situ measurements. To better understand the distribution and variability of aerosol components near the Asian tropopause and their impacts on global climate and the environment, there is an urgent need for expanded in situ observations of ATAL constituents. This includes balloon-borne measurements and aircraft-based observations to supplement and validate satellite and model-based findings.

6. Recommendations

Due to limitations in traditional observational capabilities, the current understanding of ATAL remains incomplete. Future research should focus on the following key directions:
(1) Atmospheric chemical processes and aerosol composition within ATAL: Given the diverse aerosol types present in ATAL and the substantial variability in their radiative and climatic effects, clarifying the chemical composition of these aerosols is essential for accurately assessing their climate impacts. Moreover, the aging effect of aerosols during atmospheric transport—driven by heterogeneous chemical and photochemical reactions—can alter their properties and composition. These transformations warrant further investigation.
(2) Impact of ATAL on the climate and implications for geoengineering: What are the specific climate impacts of ATAL? How can the climatic signals attributed to ATAL be isolated from a broader climate system? What implications might these findings hold for solar radiation management within geoengineering frameworks? Addressing these questions requires a precise understanding of the three-dimensional structure of ATAL. Research into ATAL’s climatic effects could provide valuable insights for evaluating the feasibility and risks of artificial climate interventions.
(3) Improvement of numerical simulation results of ATAL: Numerical modeling remains a crucial tool for investigating climate processes. However, the performance of existing models in simulating ATAL remains uneven and requires further evaluation. Therefore, enhancing the performance of climate models and accurately simulating the climate effects of ATAL using observational data represents a key direction for future research.
(4) Future prediction of ATAL changes and global climate responses: In the context of ongoing global climate change, what future trends can be expected in ATAL under different socioeconomic development trajectories? How do shifts in ATAL characteristics influence the climate system? As societies intensify efforts to combat climate change, ATAL is likely to evolve differently under varying pollutant emission scenarios, leading to distinct climate responses. These questions underscore the complexity of ATAL–climate interactions and highlight the need for deeper, targeted research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and J.M.; methodology, H.L.; software, H.L.; validation, H.L. and J.M.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, H.L.; resources, J.M.; data curation, H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, H.L., and J.M.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. and J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (252300421758), the PhD Special Project of Nanyang Normal University (No. 2025ZX025), Nanyang Normal University National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Project (No. 2025PY002) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR5RA054).

Data Availability Statement

This article did not use any new data.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (252300421758), the PhD Special Project of Nanyang Normal University (No. 2025ZX025), National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Project of Nanyang Normal University (No. 2025PY002) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR5RA054).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bucci, S.; Legras, B.; Sellitto, P.; d’Amato, F.; Viciani, S.; Montori, A.; Chiarugi, A.; Ravegnani, F.; Ulanovsky, A.; Cairo, F. Deep-convective influence on the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere composition in the Asian monsoon anticyclone region: 2017 StratoClim campaign results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 12193–12210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ohara, T.; Akimoto, H.; Kurokawa, J.; Horii, N.; Yamaji, K.; Yan, X.; Hayasaka, T. An Asian emission inventory of anthropogenic emission sources for the period 1980–2020. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7, 4419–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ghan, S.J.; Zaveri, R.A. Parameterization of optical properties for hydrated internally mixed aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2007, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Morakinyo, O.M.; Mokgobu, M.I.; Mukhola, M.S.; Hunter, R.P. Health outcomes of exposure to biological and chemical components of inhalable and respirable particulate matter. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Niu, H.; Kang, S.; Gao, W.; Wang, Y.; Paudyal, R. Vertical distribution of the Asian tropopause aerosols detected by CALIPSO. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 253, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, A.; Agrawal, M. Acid rain and its ecological consequences. J. Environ. Biol. 2007, 29, 15. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Z.; Lau, W.M.; Ramanathan, V.; Wu, G.; Ding, Y.; Manoj, M.; Liu, J.; Qian, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, T. Aerosol and monsoon climate interactions over Asia. Rev. Geophys. 2016, 54, 866–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, C.; Cribb, M.C.; Dong, X.; Fan, J.; Gong, D.; Huang, J.; Jiang, M. East Asian study of tropospheric aerosols and their impact on regional clouds, precipitation, and climate (EAST-AIRCPC). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 13026–13054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Menon, S.; Hansen, J.; Nazarenko, L.; Luo, Y. Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India. Science 2002, 297, 2250–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qian, Y.; Gong, D.; Fan, J.; Leung, L.R.; Bennartz, R.; Chen, D.; Wang, W. Heavy pollution suppresses light rain in China: Observations and modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, G.; Li, Z.; Fu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, T.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, D. Advances in studying interactions between aerosols and monsoon in China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2016, 59, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schwartz, S.E. The whitehouse effect—Shortwave radiative forcing of climate by anthropogenic aerosols: An overview. J. Aerosol Sci. 1996, 27, 359–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shindell, D.; Kuylenstierna, J.C.; Vignati, E.; van Dingenen, R.; Amann, M.; Klimont, Z.; Anenberg, S.C.; Muller, N.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Raes, F. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 2012, 335, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Qian, Y.; Ji, Z.; Li, C.; Cong, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, J.; Du, W.; Huang, J. Linking atmospheric pollution to cryospheric change in the Third Pole region: Current progress and future prospects. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Kang, S.; Gao, T.; Sprenger, M.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z. Black Carbon Size in Snow of Chinese Altai Mountain in Central Asia. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2023, 40, 1199–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, H.; Li, R.; Ma, J. Spatiotemporal and Vertical Distribution of Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer Using Long-Term Multi-Source Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aquila, V.; Oman, L.D.; Stolarski, R.S.; Colarco, P.R.; Newman, P.A. Dispersion of the volcanic sulfate cloud from a Mount Pinatubo–like eruption. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Babu, S.S.; Moorthy, K.K.; Manchanda, R.K.; Sinha, P.R.; Satheesh, S.; Vajja, D.P.; Srinivasan, S.; Kumar, V.A. Free tropospheric black carbon aerosol measurements using high altitude balloon: Do BC layers build “their own homes” up in the atmosphere? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kloss, C.; Sellitto, P.; Legras, B.; Vernier, J.P.; Jegou, F.; Venkat Ratnam, M.; Suneel Kumar, B.; Lakshmi Madhavan, B.; Berthet, G. Impact of the 2018 Ambae eruption on the global stratospheric aerosol layer and climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2020, 125, e2020JD032410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kulkarni, P.; Ramachandran, S.; Bhavani Kumar, Y.; Narayana Rao, D.; Krishnaiah, M. Features of upper troposphere and lower stratosphere aerosols observed by lidar over Gadanki, a tropical Indian station. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pitari, G.; Cionni, I.; Di Genova, G.; Visioni, D.; Gandolfi, I.; Mancini, E. Impact of stratospheric volcanic aerosols on age-of-air and transport of long-lived species. Atmosphere 2016, 7, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tobo, Y.; Iwasaka, Y.; Shi, G.-Y.; Kim, Y.-S.; Ohashi, T.; Tamura, K.; Zhang, D. Balloon-borne observations of high aerosol concentrations near the summertime tropopause over the Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Res. 2007, 84, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Randel, W.J.; Park, M.; Emmons, L.; Kinnison, D.; Bernath, P.; Walker, K.A.; Boone, C.; Pumphrey, H. Asian monsoon transport of pollution to the stratosphere. Science 2010, 328, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.; Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 2005, 435, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Venkataraman, C.; Habib, G.; Eiguren-Fernandez, A.; Miguel, A.; Friedlander, S. Residential biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science 2005, 307, 1454–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, J.; Wang, G.; Yang, P. Study on the sensitivity of summer ozone density to the enhanced aerosol loading over the tibetan Plateau. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duan, A.; Wu, G.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, P. Weather and climate effects of the Tibetan Plateau. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2012, 29, 978–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, G.; Liu, Y.; He, B.; Bao, Q.; Duan, A.; Jin, F.-F. Thermal controls on the Asian summer monsoon. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bian, J.; Li, D.; Bai, Z.; Li, Q.; Lyu, D.; Zhou, X. Transport of Asian surface pollutants to the global stratosphere from the Tibetan Plateau region during the Asian summer monsoon. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 516–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pan, L.L.; Honomichl, S.B.; Kinnison, D.E.; Abalos, M.; Randel, W.J.; Bergman, J.W.; Bian, J. Transport of chemical tracers from the boundary layer to stratosphere associated with the dynamics of the Asian summer monsoon. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2016, 121, 14159–14174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vernier, J.P.; Thomason, L.W.; Pommereau, J.P.; Bourassa, A.; Pelon, J.; Garnier, A.; Hauchecorne, A.; Blanot, L.; Trepte, C.; Degenstein, D. Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dodion, J.; Fussen, D.; Vanhellemont, F.; Bingen, C.; Mateshvili, N.; Gilbert, K.; Skelton, R.; Turnbull, D.; McLeod, S.; Boone, C. Aerosols and clouds in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere region detected by GOMOS and ACE: Intercomparison and analysis of the years 2004 and 2005. Adv. Space Res. 2008, 42, 1730–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Heckendorn, P.; Weisenstein, D.; Fueglistaler, S.; Luo, B.P.; Rozanov, E.; Schraner, M.; Thomason, L.W.; Peter, T. The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 045108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kravitz, B.; Robock, A.; Shindell, D.T.; Miller, M.A. Sensitivity of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon to aerosol size and altitude of injection. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hossaini, R.; Chipperfield, M.; Montzka, S.; Rap, A.; Dhomse, S.; Feng, W. Efficiency of short-lived halogens at influencing climate through depletion of stratospheric ozone. Nat. Geosci. 2015, 8, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bergman, J.W.; Fierli, F.; Jensen, E.J.; Honomichl, S.; Pan, L.L. Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to a vertical conduit. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 2560–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, M.; Randel, W.J.; Gettelman, A.; Massie, S.T.; Jiang, J.H. Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder tracers. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2007, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tzella, A.; Legras, B. A Lagrangian view of convective sources for transport of air across the Tropical Tropopause Layer: Distribution, times and the radiative influence of clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 12517–12534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santhosh, V.N.; Madhavan, B.L.; Akhil Raj, S.T.; Ratnam, M.V.; Vernier, J.-P.; Wienhold, F.G. Shortwave Radiative Impacts of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) using Balloon-borne In-situ measurements at three distinct locations in India. EGUsphere 2024, 2024, 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ebert, M.; Weigel, R.; Weinbruch, S.; Schneider, L.; Kandler, K.; Lauterbach, S.; Köllner, F.; Plöger, F.; Günther, G.; Vogel, B. Characterization of refractory aerosol particles collected in the tropical upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) within the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2024, 24, 4771–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kloss, C.; Bossolasco, A.; Thomason, L.; Legras, B.; Berthet, G.; Jegou, F.; Fadnavis, S.; Sellitto, P. Reconsidering the existence of a trend in the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL) from 1979 to 2017. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2024, 129, e2023JD039784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, W.L.; Yu, S.M. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of aerosols in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau region and numerical simulation of their radiative forcing and climate effects. Chin. Sci. (Vol. D Earth Sci.) 2001, 31, 300–307. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, Y.-S.; Shibata, T.; Iwasaka, Y.; Shi, G.; Zhou, X.; Tamura, K.; Ohashi, T. Enhancement of aerosols near the cold tropopause in summer over Tibetan Plateau: Lidar and balloonborne measurements in 1999 at Lhasa, Tibet, China. In Proceedings of the Lidar Remote Sensing for Industry and Environment Monitoring III, Hangzhou, China, 24–25 October 2002; pp. 496–503. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhou, R.J.; Chen, Y.J.; Bi, Y.; Yi, M. Distribution characteristics of aerosol content in the air over the Qinghai Tibet Plateau and its relationship with ozone. Plateau Meteorol. 2008, 27, 500–508. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vernier, J.P.; Fairlie, T.; Natarajan, M.; Wienhold, F.; Bian, J.; Martinsson, B.; Crumeyrolle, S.; Thomason, L.; Bedka, K. Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2015, 120, 1608–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomason, L.; Vernier, J.-P. Improved SAGE II cloud/aerosol categorization and observations of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer: 1989–2005. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 4605–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vernier, J.-P.; Fairlie, T.; Deshler, T.; Venkat Ratnam, M.; Gadhavi, H.; Kumar, B.; Natarajan, M.; Pandit, A.; Akhil Raj, S.; Hemanth Kumar, A. BATAL: The balloon measurement campaigns of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2018, 99, 955–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, P.; Rosenlof, K.H.; Liu, S.; Telg, H.; Thornberry, T.D.; Rollins, A.W.; Portmann, R.W.; Bai, Z.; Ray, E.A.; Duan, Y. Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6972–6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, D.; Shi, T.; Niu, X.; Chen, Z.; Cui, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Ji, M.; Wang, X. Seasonal to sub-seasonal variations of the Asian Tropopause Aerosols Layer affected by the deep convection, surface pollutants and precipitation. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 114, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, P.; Toon, O.B.; Neely, R.R.; Martinsson, B.G.; Brenninkmeijer, C.A. Composition and physical properties of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer and the North American tropospheric aerosol layer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 2540–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fairlie, T.D.; Liu, H.; Vernier, J.P.; Campuzano-Jost, P.; Jimenez, J.L.; Jo, D.S.; Zhang, B.; Natarajan, M.; Avery, M.A.; Huey, G. Estimates of regional source contributions to the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer using a chemical transport model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2020, 125, e2019JD031506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gu, Y.; Liao, H.; Bian, J. Summertime nitrate aerosol in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere over the Tibetan Plateau and the South Asian summer monsoon region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 6641–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fadnavis, S.; Kalita, G.; Kumar, K.R.; Gasparini, B.; Li, J.-L.F. Potential impact of carbonaceous aerosol on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) and precipitation during Asian summer monsoon in a global model simulation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 11637–11654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, J.; Brühl, C.; He, Q.; Steil, B.; Karydis, V.A.; Klingmüller, K.; Tost, H.; Chen, B.; Jin, Y.; Liu, N. Modeling the aerosol chemical composition of the tropopause over the Tibetan Plateau during the Asian summer monsoon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 11587–11612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, S.; Bai, Z.; Xia, X.; Chen, B.; Zong, X.; Bian, J. In situ measurements and backward-trajectory analysis of high-concentration, fine-mode aerosols in the UTLS over the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 124068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bossolasco, A.; Jegou, F.; Sellitto, P.; Berthet, G.; Kloss, C.; Legras, B. Global modeling studies of composition and decadal trends of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 2745–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gettelman, A.; Kinnison, D.E.; Dunkerton, T.J.; Brasseur, G.P. Impact of monsoon circulations on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2004, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, M.; Randel, W.J.; Emmons, L.K.; Livesey, N.J. Transport pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frey, W.; Schofield, R.; Hoor, P.; Kunkel, D.; Ravegnani, F.; Ulanovsky, A.; Viciani, S.; D’Amato, F.; Lane, T.P. The impact of overshooting deep convection on local transport and mixing in the tropical upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 6467–6486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lau, W.K.; Yuan, C.; Li, Z. Origin, maintenance and variability of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL): The roles of monsoon dynamics. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yuan, C.; Lau, W.K.; Li, Z.; Cribb, M. Relationship between Asian monsoon strength and transport of surface aerosols to the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL): Interannual variability and decadal changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 1901–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fadnavis, S.; Semeniuk, K.; Pozzoli, L.; Schultz, M.; Ghude, S.; Das, S.; Kakatkar, R. Transport of aerosols into the UTLS and their impact on the Asian monsoon region as seen in a global model simulation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 8771–8786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Neely III, R.; Yu, P.; Rosenlof, K.; Toon, O.; Daniel, J.; Solomon, S.; Miller, H. The contribution of anthropogenic SO2 emissions to the Asian tropopause aerosol layer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vogel, B.; Günther, G.; Müller, R.; Grooß, J.-U.; Riese, M. Impact of different Asian source regions on the composition of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and of the extratropical lowermost stratosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 13699–13716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Legras, B.; Bucci, S. Confinement of air in the Asian monsoon anticyclone and pathways of convective air to the stratosphere during the summer season. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 11045–11064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tissier, A.-S.; Legras, B. Convective sources of trajectories traversing the tropical tropopause layer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 3383–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bergman, J.W.; Jensen, E.J.; Pfister, L.; Yang, Q. Seasonal differences of vertical-transport efficiency in the tropical tropopause layer: On the interplay between tropical deep convection, large-scale vertical ascent, and horizontal circulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wen, H.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, T.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Q.; Li, W.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, T. Water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric aerosols along the transport pathway of Asian dust: Optical properties, chemical compositions, and potential sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 789, 147971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ramaswamy, V.; Collins, W.; Haywood, J.; Lean, J.; Mahowald, N.; Myhre, G.; Naik, V.; Shine, K.P.; Soden, B.; Stenchikov, G. Radiative forcing of climate: The historical evolution of the radiative forcing concept, the forcing agents and their quantification, and applications. Meteorol. Monogr. 2019, 59, 14.1–14.101. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gao, J.; Huang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wright, J.S. Aerosol Effects on Clear-Sky Shortwave Heating in the Asian Monsoon Tropopause Layer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2023, 128, e2022JD036956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gao, K.; Duan, A.; Chen, D.; Wu, G. Surface energy budget diagnosis reveals possible mechanism for the different warming rate among Earth’s three poles in recent decades. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 1140–1143. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shi, G.-Y.; Hayasaka, T.; Ohmura, A.; Chen, Z.-H.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J.-Q.; Che, H.-Z.; Xu, L. Data quality assessment and the long-term trend of ground solar radiation in China. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2008, 47, 1006–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Qian, Y.; Kaiser, D.P.; Leung, L.R.; Xu, M. More frequent cloud-free sky and less surface solar radiation in China from 1955 to 2000. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Johnson, B.; Haywood, J.; Hawcroft, M. Are changes in atmospheric circulation important for black carbon aerosol impacts on clouds, precipitation, and radiation? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 7930–7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lau, K.M.; Kim, K.M. Observational relationships between aerosol and Asian monsoon rainfall, and circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Volten, H.; Munoz, O.; Rol, E.; De Haan, J.; Vassen, W.; Hovenier, J.; Muinonen, K.; Nousiainen, T. Scattering matrices of mineral aerosol particles at 441.6 nm and 632.8 nm. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001, 106, 17375–17401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Whitby, K.T. The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols. In Sulfur in the Atmosphere; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978; pp. 135–159. [Google Scholar]
  79. Li, Z. Overview of the impact of aerosols on weather, climate, and environment in China. J. Atmos. Sci. 2020, 43, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Twomey, S. The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 1977, 34, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar]
  81. Albrecht, B.A. Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science 1989, 245, 1227–1230. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kreidenweis, S.M.; Petters, M.; Lohmann, U. 100 years of progress in cloud physics, aerosols, and aerosol chemistry research. Meteorol. Monogr. 2019, 59, 11.1–11.72. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lohmann, U.; Feichter, J. Global indirect aerosol effects: A review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 715–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, M.-K.; Lau, W.K.; Chin, M.; Kim, K.-M.; Sud, Y.; Walker, G.K. Atmospheric teleconnection over Eurasia induced by aerosol radiative forcing during boreal spring. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 4700–4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ming, Y.; Ramaswamy, V.; Chen, G. A model investigation of aerosol-induced changes in boreal winter extratropical circulation. J. Clim. 2011, 24, 6077–6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ramanathan, V.; Chung, C.; Kim, D.; Bettge, T.; Buja, L.; Kiehl, J.T.; Washington, W.M.; Fu, Q.; Sikka, D.R.; Wild, M. Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5326–5333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Toth, T.D.; Zhang, J.; Campbell, J.R.; Reid, J.S.; Vaughan, M.A. Temporal variability of aerosol optical thickness vertical distribution observed from CALIOP. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2016, 121, 9117–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Choi, J.-O.; Chung, C.E. Sensitivity of aerosol direct radiative forcing to aerosol vertical profile. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 2014, 66, 24376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cziczo, D.; Abbatt, J. Ice nucleation in NH4HSO4, NH4NO3, and H2SO4 aqueous particles: Implications for cirrus cloud formation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Su, H.; Jiang, J.H.; Liu, X.; Penner, J.E.; Read, W.G.; Massie, S.; Schoeberl, M.R.; Colarco, P.; Livesey, N.J.; Santee, M.L. Observed increase of TTL temperature and water vapor in polluted clouds over Asia. J. Clim. 2011, 24, 2728–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Solomon, S.; Rosenlof, K.H.; Portmann, R.W.; Daniel, J.S.; Davis, S.M.; Sanford, T.J.; Plattner, G.-K. Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming. Science 2010, 327, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. On 4 July 2016, (a) the orbital projection of the CALIPSO satellite, and (b) the vertical distribution of the Total Attenuated Backscatter (TAB) of CALIPSO between 0 and 50 °N (adopted by Liu et al. [17]).
Figure 1. On 4 July 2016, (a) the orbital projection of the CALIPSO satellite, and (b) the vertical distribution of the Total Attenuated Backscatter (TAB) of CALIPSO between 0 and 50 °N (adopted by Liu et al. [17]).
Sustainability 17 03381 g001
Figure 2. ATAL time series represented by SAGEII, CALIPSO, MERRA-2 from 2006 to 2019 (adopted by Liu et al. [17]).
Figure 2. ATAL time series represented by SAGEII, CALIPSO, MERRA-2 from 2006 to 2019 (adopted by Liu et al. [17]).
Sustainability 17 03381 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Ma, J. The Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Trends, and Climate Effects. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083381

AMA Style

Liu H, Ma J. The Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Trends, and Climate Effects. Sustainability. 2025; 17(8):3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Hongchao, and Junjie Ma. 2025. "The Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Trends, and Climate Effects" Sustainability 17, no. 8: 3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083381

APA Style

Liu, H., & Ma, J. (2025). The Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Trends, and Climate Effects. Sustainability, 17(8), 3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop