Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Economic Financialization on the Income Gap Between Urban and Rural Residents: Evidence from China
Next Article in Special Issue
Determinants of Travel Experience-Sharing Behavior on Chinese Social Media Platforms
Previous Article in Journal
NDVI Performance for Monitoring Agricultural Energy Inputs Using Landsat Imagery: A Study in the Ecuadorian Andes (2012–2023)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toward Sustainable Tourism: An Activity-Based Segmentation of the Rural Tourism Market in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era

by
Adelina Zeqiri
1,*,
Adel Ben Youssef
1 and
Teja Maherzi Zahar
2
1
Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG)—Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University Côte d’Azur, EUR ELMI 24, Avenue des Diables Bleus, 06300 Nice, France
2
Tunis Higher Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Tunis 1007, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3482; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083482
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 8 April 2025 / Accepted: 11 April 2025 / Published: 14 April 2025

Abstract

:
The intersection of digitalization and sustainability is reshaping the tourism industry, with digital platforms playing a transformative role in optimizing travel experiences while simultaneously influencing economic inclusivity, labor dynamics, and environmental responsibility. This paper explores how Industry 4.0 technologies—such as artificial intelligence (AI), big data, blockchain, virtual reality (VR), and the Internet of Things (IoT)—are integrated into digital tourism platforms, assessing their dual impact on sustainability and market structures. The study develops a conceptual framework around five key dimensions: market power and digital dependency, AI-driven automation and workforce transformation, innovation and digital inclusion, sustainability innovations, and data security and governance. While digital platforms enhance personalization, operational efficiency, and eco-conscious travel, they also reinforce economic disparities, monopolization, and regulatory challenges, raising concerns related to SDGs such as SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption, and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions). The study highlights the need for equitable governance frameworks to mitigate risks associated with AI-driven monopolization, algorithmic bias, and data privacy violations while ensuring digital accessibility for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The findings contribute to ongoing discussions on platform economics, digital governance, and sustainable tourism transformation, offering policy and managerial implications for fostering an inclusive and environmentally responsible tourism industry.

1. Introduction

The tourism industry is undergoing a profound transformation driven by the dual forces of digitalization and sustainability [1,2,3]. The confluence of digital technologies, which is reshaping the manner in which individuals interact, and the escalating global awareness of environmental and social challenges, has positioned the sector to seamlessly integrate innovation with responsibility [4]. Digital platforms have played a pivotal role in this evolution, streamlining travel planning and offering tools to book accommodations, customize itineraries, and explore destinations effortlessly [5,6]. Concurrently, mounting concerns regarding overtourism, cultural commodification, and ecosystem degradation have underscored the imperative for sustainable practices that prioritize environmental conservation, cultural heritage, and local empowerment [7,8]. These challenges have prompted a reimagining of tourism, where technology and sustainability converge to shape the future of travel.
Digital platforms, which are defined as algorithm-driven online systems connecting stakeholders and structuring economic activities [9,10,11,12], are at the heart of this transformation. Notable platforms such as Airbnb (https://www.airbnb.com/, accessed on 30 December 2024) and Booking.com (https://www.booking.com/, accessed on 30 December 2024) have effectively transformed conventional business models, thereby establishing direct connections between travelers, service providers, and local communities. These platforms have also contributed to rural revitalization by promoting lesser-known destinations and empowering local businesses, directly advancing goals such as SDG 8, which emphasizes economic growth and inclusive development [13]. For instance, while rural areas constituted a mere 16% of European accommodation sales in 2019, this figure increased to 38% when bookings were made via online travel platforms. However, this rapid expansion has concomitant challenges, including heightened competition among destinations and the dependency on third-party intermediaries, which often take a share of revenues and increase competitive pressures [14].
The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies—namely, AI, the IoT, and big data analytics—has further revolutionized all sectors of the economy [15] including tourism and hospitality value chain. These technologies have transformed platforms into drivers of personalization, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction [16,17]. The introduction of new participants, such as analytics providers and energy management systems, has led to the diversification of the ecosystem and the fostering of innovation. This phenomenon aligns with the tenets of platform theory, which underscores the pivotal role of digital platforms in reconfiguring economic interactions and facilitating collaborative business models among small and medium-sized enterprises [18,19]. The presence of such collaborative ecosystems is crucial for ensuring the participation of smaller firms in the digital economy, thereby fostering equitable growth across various regions.
Despite the significant advancements in digital platforms, critical gaps remain in understanding their role in fostering sustainable tourism. Sustainable tourism is defined by the World Tourism Organization as “tourism that takes full account of its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the industry, the environment and host communities” [13]. While existing research has explored the disruptive impact of platforms such as Airbnb, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor on traditional market structures, there is limited investigation into how their integration of Industry 4.0 technologies—such as AI, blockchain, and immersive digital tools—affects competition, market inclusivity, and sustainability outcomes [20,21,22]. Moreover, questions persist regarding the extent to which these platforms contribute to sustainable resource management, equitable economic participation, and responsible tourism governance. While digital platforms have demonstrated potential in optimizing pricing strategies, streamlining booking processes, and facilitating more personalized experiences, they also raise concerns related to market concentration, data privacy, and the digital divide among tourism operators [23].
This study seeks to address these gaps by analyzing the dual role of digital platforms in promoting sustainable tourism while also presenting challenges related to digital dependency, economic concentration, and regulatory oversight. By examining the intersections of AI-driven personalization, automation, digital inclusion, sustainability innovations, and data governance, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of how digital platforms are reshaping tourism business models in alignment with sustainability principles. Specifically, this research investigates how digital platforms impact market structures, labor dynamics, accessibility, gender equality, and environmental responsibility, linking these transformations to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 1, SDG 5, SDG 8, SDG 9, SDG 10, SDG 12, SDG 13, and SDG 16. Accordingly, the central research question guiding this study is: How do digital tourism platforms leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies advance sustainable tourism, and how can challenges related to digital dependency, economic inequalities, gender disparities, and governance be effectively addressed?
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a comprehensive literature review. Section 3 details the methodological framework. Section 4 presents the key dimensions of the framework with propositions. Finally, Section 5 offers conclusions, policy implications, and future research.

2. Literature Review

A substantial body of research has been dedicated to examining the nexus between the tourism industry and sustainability. The field of sustainable tourism research is characterized by its broad scope and diverse range of perspectives, reflecting its inherent complexity and multidimensionality. From a macro perspective, studies investigate the interplay between tourism and sustainability, examining issues such as the role of tourism in advancing social sustainability during the pandemic [24,25], the impact of sustainable development goals on tourism performance [26], and the connections between tourism and climate sustainability [27]. At the meso level, research explores the relationships between sustainable tourism and various sectors, including its links to cultural heritage preservation, urbanization, rural development, green consumption, and environmental governance [20,28,29]. At the micro-level, studies emphasize individuals and organizations, underscoring how travelers’ attitudes and residents’ participation influence sustainable tourism. These studies also highlight the benefits for stakeholders’ quality of life and organizational growth, including enhanced innovation and competitiveness [30,31]. Moreover, literature reviews employing varied methodologies, including bibliometric and content analysis, have synthesized insights on niche subjects such as ecotourism, destination resilience, and tourism education [32,33,34]. Notwithstanding its extensive scope, sustainable tourism research is subject to criticism for its conceptual and theoretical limitations, as well as its inability to consistently provide actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders [35,36]. Challenges such as a lack of focus, disciplinary silos, and weak theoretical foundations [37,38] continue to hinder the field’s progress towards addressing urgent issues such as climate change and sustainable development.
Literature exploring digital platforms highlights their transformative role across multiple sectors, focusing particularly on governance, ecosystem innovation, and industry-wide transformations [39,40,41]. Studies on platform governance underline how diverse actors—including governments, NGOs, and corporations—influence policy instruments and regulate digital marketplaces [41]. Platforms are recognized as crucial innovation catalysts within service ecosystems, orchestrating interactions among diverse stakeholders to drive sectoral transformations through matching, resourcing, and valuation [39]. However, digital platforms have also created governance challenges related to data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and market concentration, prompting calls for regulatory intervention [40]. These issues underline the importance of balanced governance frameworks capable of managing digital platforms’ benefits while mitigating associated risks such as monopolistic behaviors and ethical concerns related to data use [41,42].
In tourism specifically, digital platforms such as Airbnb, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor have disrupted conventional business models by democratizing market access and facilitating peer-to-peer interactions [12,20,43,44,45,46]. Integrating advanced Industry 4.0 technologies—such as AI, VR, blockchain, and big data analytics—these platforms have enhanced customer experiences, personalization, and operational efficiency [47]. Concepts such as “Tourism 4.0”, which integrates IoT and blockchain into tourism operations, promise significant sustainability benefits through improved collaboration and reduced environmental impacts [47,48]. Nevertheless, digitalization in tourism introduces substantial ethical and regulatory challenges. For example, platform-driven market centralization contributes to economic inequalities, housing affordability issues, and urban gentrification in popular destinations [49]. Additionally, while platforms have promoted responsible travel by highlighting eco-friendly accommodations, they have simultaneously exacerbated overtourism by directing tourists toward already congested destinations [45]. Addressing these tensions requires research on effective regulatory frameworks that ensure digital tourism innovations promote equitable and sustainable development [40].
Despite extensive analysis, notable gaps persist regarding how digital platforms directly contribute to achieving sustainable development goals within tourism contexts. Few studies explicitly link digital platforms to SDG outcomes, particularly regarding inclusivity, equity, and governance [20,21,22,25]. This study directly addresses these gaps, investigating how digital platforms utilizing Industry 4.0 technologies can foster sustainable tourism aligned with global sustainability goals.

3. Methodology

3.1. Research Design

This study employs a conceptual, theory-building research design to explore how digital tourism platforms contribute to sustainable tourism development. This approach is aligned with guidelines for rigorous conceptual research [50] and is appropriate given the emerging nature of Industry 4.0 phenomena in tourism. Rather than collecting primary data, the study builds new theoretical insights by integrating diverse sources of knowledge. The rationale for a conceptual design is to holistically examine the transformative role of Industry 4.0 technologies—AI, big data analytics, blockchain, VR, and the IoT—in reshaping tourism business models towards sustainability principles. By adopting this theory-building stance, the research can synthesize fragmented insights and propose a structured framework for how digital platforms drive sustainable tourism innovations and what challenges arise in this process. The design is inherently exploratory and integrative, aiming to develop propositions and a framework that illuminate the mechanisms linking digital platform advancements with sustainable tourism outcomes. This provides a foundation for understanding the topic that future empirical studies can build upon.

3.2. Data Sources and Selection

To ensure a robust foundation for conceptual analysis, the study draws on multiple data sources from both academia and practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, covering peer-reviewed academic publications (journal articles, conference proceedings, and relevant book chapters) as well as pertinent industry and policy documents. Key sources included scholarly research on tourism, sustainability, and digital innovation, alongside reports and white papers from organizations such as the UNWTO and the European Commission. These sources were selected to capture both theoretical perspectives and real-world policy and industry insights on digital tourism and sustainability. Selection criteria were defined to identify the most relevant literature. The review targeted works at the intersection of digitalization, tourism, and sustainable development. In particular, sources discussing topics like platform economics in tourism, AI-driven personalization of travel services, sustainability-oriented innovations (e.g., eco-friendly travel apps, blockchain for carbon tracking), and governance challenges in platform ecosystems were prioritized. The search strategy spanned multiple academic databases (such as Scopus and Web of Science) and used focused keywords including “digital platforms AND sustainable tourism”, “Industry 4.0 tourism”, “AI in hospitality”, “blockchain tourism governance”, and “tourism platform regulation”. This process was iteratively expanded using snowball techniques (reviewing references of key papers) to ensure comprehensive coverage. The final selection encompassed a multidisciplinary range of perspectives—from tourism management and sustainability science to information systems and economics—providing a rich knowledge base. By synthesizing information across these diverse sources, the study grounds its conceptual arguments in well-established research findings and practical observations, enhancing the credibility and breadth of the methodology.

3.3. Conceptual Framework Development

Using insights from the collected literature, the study developed a conceptual framework (Figure 1) through a process of deductive reasoning and thematic synthesis. Following the approach suggested by [51] for conceptual model building, first, were distilled recurrent themes and constructs from the literature that explain how digital platforms intersect with sustainable tourism. Five key thematic dimensions emerged, each representing a critical facet of Industry 4.0’s impact on tourism business models and sustainability. These dimensions include (1) Platform market power and digital dependency, (2) AI-driven automation and workforce transformation, (3) Innovation and digital inclusion, (4) Sustainability-focused digital innovations, and (5) Data security and governance. Each theme captures a set of related issues identified in prior studies—for example, market power and dependency highlight the influence of dominant platforms on market structure and small firms, while the innovation and inclusion dimension addresses how advanced technologies like VR/AI can both enhance experiences and create access gaps. By organizing the framework around these themes, the study ensures that it covers a comprehensive scope of both the opportunities and the challenges introduced by digital platforms in tourism’s sustainable transition. For each of the five dimensions, the research formulated specific theoretical propositions that articulate the expected relationships or outcomes. These propositions serve as formal statements hypothesizing how a given aspect of digital platform integration influences sustainable tourism objectives (positively or negatively). In line with best practices for conceptual research, the propositions were derived logically from the reviewed literature and existing theory, rather than from empirical observation. This proposition-driven modeling is consistent with methods used in similar recent studies on tourism and technology (e.g., [34,52]).
Each proposition was crafted to reflect a dual perspective: highlighting how Industry 4.0 technologies can enable progress toward certain SDGs in tourism, while also acknowledging potential unintended consequences or trade-offs. For instance, one proposition might posit that AI-driven personalization improves resource efficiency and customer satisfaction (supporting economic and environmental SDGs), yet it could concurrently raise concerns about data privacy or algorithmic bias (posing governance and equity challenges). By explicitly addressing both benefits and drawbacks in the propositions, the framework remains balanced and critical, aligning with scientific rigor and transparency. The end result of this analytical process is a conceptual model that integrates findings across disciplines into a coherent structure, providing new theoretical insights into how digital tourism platforms simultaneously advance and hinder sustainability. This framework is intended not only to organize current knowledge but also to guide analysis in the subsequent sections of the paper, where each dimension and its propositions are discussed in detail.

3.4. Limitations of Conceptual Study

As a conceptual study, this research inherently lacks empirical validation, presenting theoretical propositions derived solely through literature synthesis and deductive reasoning. Consequently, the relationships proposed between digital platforms, Industry 4.0 technologies, and sustainability outcomes might oversimplify complex realities or omit contextual nuances across diverse tourism settings. Future empirical studies are necessary to test, validate, and refine these propositions, ensuring broader applicability and robustness.

4. Main Research Results

The advent of digital platforms in the tourism industry has led to a fundamental change in the way companies operate, driving innovation and competition. The emergence of global distribution systems (GDSs) and online travel agencies (OTAs), such as Expedia, has marked a pivotal transition. These platforms have restructured market dynamics, democratized access, and introduced consumer-driven decision-making processes [53]. Furthermore, the emergence of Industry 4.0, driven by the integration of advanced technologies such as IoT, AI, and big data, is having a profound impact on tourism business models [23]. This transformation is consistent with theoretical frameworks such as dynamic capabilities [54,55,56], platform theory, and techno-determinism, which emphasize the need for organizations to adapt, innovate, and leverage technological advances to remain competitive. As shown in Table 1, the key challenges and strategies for monitoring Industry 4.0 technologies in tourism underscore the complex interplay of these factors. The subsequent sections present the main findings, accompanied by the key propositions derived from the conceptual framework illustrated in Figure 1.

4.1. Market Power and Digital Dependency in Platform-Driven Tourism

The transformation of tourism business models through digital platforms presents both opportunities and challenges. The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies, such as AI, big data, and immersive digital experiences, has significantly enhanced efficiency, personalization, and market reach. These advancements enable businesses to optimize pricing strategies, streamline booking systems, and improve customer experiences. However, they have also contributed to growing digital dependency, widened economic disparities, and increased market concentration, particularly in favor of dominant OTAs and multinational tourism platforms. While these technologies facilitate operational improvements, their benefits are not evenly distributed, with smaller tourism operators facing structural barriers that limit their ability to compete [23]. The increasing digital divide in tourism raises concerns related to SDG 1, as economic exclusion from digital transformation may worsen financial instability for small operators, particularly in developing economies where tourism plays a crucial role in local livelihoods.
The increasing role of AI in tourism platforms exemplifies the dual impact of digital transformation. On one hand, AI-powered personalization has significantly enhanced customer engagement by providing tailored recommendations, automated service delivery, and data-driven marketing. OTAs such as Expedia and Booking.com leverage AI to enhance hotel sales, predict consumer behavior, and adjust prices dynamically. The new forms of tourism improve booking conversion rates and increase customer satisfaction [53]. However, on the other hand, AI-driven personalization has created strong dependencies on dominant platforms, particularly for SMEs that lack the financial and technical capacity to develop proprietary AI solutions. As a result, independent tourism operators increasingly rely on large OTAs for visibility, pricing algorithms, and customer access, which limits their control over their own market strategies. This growing dependency raises concerns regarding technological accessibility and economic inclusivity, highlighting disparities in digital infrastructure. AI-driven personalization aligns with SDG 9, which emphasizes the role of technological innovation in economic development. However, the concentration of AI capabilities within a few dominant platforms limits the distribution of these benefits, restricting SMEs’ ability to leverage AI for competitive advantage. Moreover, this reliance on centralized AI-driven personalization exacerbates SDG 10, reinforcing structural barriers that prevent smaller operators from establishing direct relationships with consumers and leading to further economic stratification. Additionally, since women-led businesses in tourism face greater challenges in accessing digital tools and financing, the monopolization of AI-driven platforms risks further marginalizing female entrepreneurs in tourism, aligning with SDG 5.
Proposition 1.
AI-driven personalization in digital tourism platforms enhances customer experience and operational efficiency but increases dependency on dominant platform ecosystems, limiting economic inclusivity.
The expansion of AI-driven revenue management tools has introduced further complexities in market competition. Platforms now employ sophisticated algorithmic pricing models, leveraging real-time demand forecasting and dynamic price optimization [57]. These advances enhance economic efficiency by maximizing occupancy rates and optimizing seasonal pricing strategies. However, the benefits of these pricing mechanisms are not equitably distributed. Dominant OTAs possess superior algorithmic capabilities, enabling them to adjust prices instantaneously based on demand fluctuations. In contrast, smaller operators lack access to similar pricing intelligence and automation capabilities, making them increasingly vulnerable in competitive price settings. This technological asymmetry results in financial instability for independent hotels and travel agencies, forcing them to either participate in aggressive price wars or become increasingly reliant on third-party platforms for distribution. The capacity of dominant platforms to control pricing through AI-based forecasting contributes to economic exclusion for smaller service providers, as they are unable to compete with the sophisticated revenue optimization tools employed by larger firms [58]. From a policy perspective, this raises concerns related to SDG 8, which promotes sustainable and inclusive economic participation. While dynamic pricing enhances economic efficiency and allows for revenue maximization, it simultaneously exacerbates SDG 10 by reinforcing market concentration and reducing profitability for smaller operators who lack the ability to compete with AI-driven pricing strategies. Additionally, as AI-powered pricing models influence tourism demand, they play a role in optimizing travel routes and accommodation occupancy, contributing to SDG 12 by reducing unnecessary resource consumption. However, the financial pressures created by these models also disproportionately affect low-income operators, raising further concerns under SDG 1.
Proposition 2.
Industry 4.0 technologies improve pricing efficiency and revenue optimization but exacerbate market concentration, reducing profitability for traditional service providers.
The consolidation of power within a few dominant digital platforms has fundamentally reshaped market dynamics in tourism. By leveraging vast consumer data, AI-driven personalization, and predictive analytics, platforms have gained significant control over market trends and consumer access [19,59]. While these capabilities improve service delivery and operational efficiency, they also present serious risks related to monopolistic control and limited market fairness. The ability of platforms such as Expedia, Airbnb, and Google Travel to aggregate and analyze consumer data has enabled them to establish near-monopolistic market positions. Through AI-powered demand forecasting and real-time price adjustments, these platforms dictate pricing trends, control consumer access, and influence supplier visibility, leaving smaller tourism operators with minimal bargaining power. This situation is further aggravated by the increased reliance of independent tourism providers on OTAs for online bookings. Hotels and local operators often pay high commission fees to OTAs while remaining subject to platform-controlled pricing strategies, making it difficult for them to achieve financial sustainability. This structural dependency on a few dominant platforms aligns with concerns raised by SDG 10, which emphasizes fair economic participation. The growing concentration of power within a small number of digital tourism platforms creates barriers to entry for new market participants and restricts economic diversification within the sector. Smaller operators are left with fewer options to engage directly with consumers, forcing them to comply with platform algorithms that dictate pricing, ranking, and visibility. This also has broader implications for SDG 16, as it raises regulatory concerns related to market fairness, data privacy, and platform governance. Moreover, AI-driven market control has indirect environmental implications linked to SDG 13, as dominant platforms influence tourism demand flows, which can exacerbate overtourism in high-demand destinations or, conversely, help distribute tourism more sustainably if managed responsibly. Without stronger regulatory oversight, these market imbalances may deepen, reinforcing economic dependence on platform giants.
Proposition 3.
The dominance of AI-driven digital platforms in tourism enhances efficiency but creates dependency, limiting competition and market fairness.
The increasing reliance on platform-driven distribution channels in tourism reflects broader trends in digital platform economics, where data concentration and algorithmic decision-making reinforce structural inequalities. While these platforms have improved customer experiences and operational efficiency, they have simultaneously reduced market diversity by prioritizing large-scale operators over smaller businesses. The shift toward algorithmically controlled tourism ecosystems raises important regulatory questions about competition law, data ownership, and economic fairness. As digital tourism continues to evolve, ensuring that AI-driven personalization, revenue optimization, and platform economics align with inclusive growth objectives will be critical. The ability of smaller tourism operators to leverage digital transformation without being entirely dependent on dominant platforms will determine the sustainability of market competition. While technological advancements present opportunities for improved efficiency, their governance and distribution must be structured to foster inclusive participation and equitable economic outcomes.

4.2. AI, Automation, and the Transformation of Work in Tourism

The integration of AI, automation, and digital platforms into tourism and hospitality is redefining work processes, customer interactions, and operational efficiency. While these technological advancements enhance personalization, streamline service delivery, and improve sustainability, they also pose challenges related to employment, market concentration, and accessibility. As platforms such as Expedia, Airbnb, Booking.com, and Google Travel continue embedding AI-driven automation, they contribute to both economic growth and workforce displacement. The increasing reliance on automated systems has significant implications for market structures and labor dynamics, shaping the future of tourism employment. This dual impact aligns with SDG 9, which promotes technological advancement as a driver of economic development but also raises concerns about SDG 8 and SDG 1, as automation can lead to job losses, particularly affecting low-income workers.
AI-driven customer engagement tools, such as chatbots, virtual assistants, and predictive analytics, are now widely deployed across digital platforms to enhance service efficiency and improve customer interactions [60]. Automated booking systems, AI-powered travel assistants, and dynamic pricing mechanisms contribute to seamless travel experiences while allowing businesses to optimize occupancy rates [61]. Additionally, robotics is revolutionizing hospitality operations, with automated room service, cleaning robots, and contactless check-ins reducing dependence on human labor. While these innovations enhance productivity and reduce operational costs, they disrupt traditional employment structures, particularly for low-skilled workers in front-desk operations, housekeeping, and customer service. This transformation aligns with SDG 9, as it supports efficiency and economic modernization, but also raises concerns under SDG 8, as it alters job structures and requires new workforce strategies. Furthermore, SDG 1 is at risk, as workers without digital skills face job displacement, exacerbating economic vulnerabilities, particularly in developing economies. A critical challenge emerging from AI-driven automation is the need for workforce reskilling. Many workers in the tourism and hospitality sectors are at risk of losing their jobs due to automation, creating an urgent need for investment in training programs that help employees transition into roles that complement AI rather than being replaced by it [62]. Businesses and policymakers must ensure that technological adoption does not come at the expense of inclusive employment opportunities. Training programs focused on digital skills, AI oversight, and customer experience management could enable workers to adapt to evolving industry demands. Moreover, algorithmic transparency is essential to ensure that AI-driven hiring and pricing mechanisms remain fair and do not reinforce existing biases [63]. Ensuring fair and ethical AI implementation aligns with SDG 16, which emphasizes transparency, fairness, and governance in technological decision-making.
Proposition 4.
Digital platforms leveraging AI and robotics improve efficiency and sustainability in tourism and hospitality, but they require workforce reskilling to mitigate job displacement and ensure equitable digital transformation.
The increasing sophistication of AI-driven hyper-personalization in tourism services has also transformed customer experiences. Digital platforms now analyze real-time guest data to customize services, from automated check-ins via facial recognition to smart room controls that adjust lighting and temperature based on user preferences [64]. This hyper-personalization enhances convenience, improves brand loyalty, and optimizes energy use, directly aligning with SDG 9, as it fosters innovation in service delivery and operational efficiency. Predictive maintenance powered by AI further reduces downtime, optimizing resource utilization and contributing to SDG 12 by minimizing waste and improving sustainability. However, AI-driven personalization remains concentrated in large hospitality brands and luxury travel operators, with smaller businesses struggling to afford the required investments in data infrastructure and machine learning capabilities. This growing digital divide raises concerns regarding the accessibility of AI-powered solutions, particularly for SMEs and independent service providers. Smaller tourism operators often lack the financial and technical resources to implement AI-driven personalization, limiting their ability to compete in an increasingly technology-driven market. The lack of access to data-driven customization tools reinforces SDG 10, as economic disparities widen between well-funded tourism firms and smaller businesses unable to keep pace with digital transformation. Additionally, the extensive collection of personal guest data raises privacy concerns, making it necessary to establish clear governance frameworks to protect consumer rights and ensure ethical AI use. This aligns with SDG 16, as it underscores the need for ethical governance, institutional transparency, and consumer protection in AI-driven personalization.
Proposition 5.
AI-driven digital platforms enhance hyper-personalized guest experiences and operational efficiency, but their widespread adoption depends on accessibility and data governance.
Beyond individual customer interactions, digital platforms are increasingly integrating multiple tourism services—such as lodging, transportation, dining, and local experiences—into seamless travel ecosystems. AI-powered travel platforms now offer dynamic itinerary recommendations, real-time pricing adjustments, and integrated service bookings, significantly simplifying travel planning [59]. These innovations improve market efficiency and create economies of scale, aligning with SDG 9, as they enhance digital infrastructure and foster innovation-driven growth. However, while these integrated ecosystems provide greater convenience for consumers, they also risk reinforcing monopolization and increasing dependency on dominant travel intermediaries [65]. The network effects generated by large digital platforms strengthen their competitive advantage, making it difficult for smaller operators to compete independently. As tourism ecosystems become more centralized, independent service providers often face high commission fees to participate in dominant platforms, limiting their profitability and increasing their reliance on third-party digital marketplaces. This scenario reflects concerns related to SDG 10, as smaller tourism businesses struggle to maintain competitive autonomy within an industry increasingly shaped by a few major players. The consolidation of digital travel platforms also raises regulatory concerns under SDG 16, as market fairness, data ownership, and economic accessibility come into question. Without stronger regulatory oversight, these ecosystems risk creating barriers to entry for smaller service providers, reinforcing economic concentration and limiting market diversity. Furthermore, AI-driven travel platforms influence sustainability outcomes by shaping travel demand, suggesting eco-friendly accommodations, and promoting sustainable transportation choices. In this regard, well-regulated AI-powered ecosystems could contribute positively to SDG 12 and SDG 13 by encouraging low-carbon tourism alternatives.
Proposition 6.
Platform-based travel ecosystems simplify travel planning and optimize resource management, but they also risk reinforcing monopolization and dependency on dominant platforms.
The rapid adoption of AI and automation in tourism presents a paradox: while these innovations enhance efficiency, personalization, and sustainability, they simultaneously create challenges related to employment, market accessibility, and economic fairness. As tourism platforms continue evolving, ensuring that AI-driven transformation aligns with inclusive economic policies will be crucial. Addressing workforce reskilling, data privacy, and regulatory fairness in digital ecosystems will determine whether AI-driven tourism promotes sustainable development or exacerbates existing inequalities.

4.3. Innovation, Accessibility, and Digital Inclusion in Tourism

The rise of immersive technologies, such as VR and augmented reality (AR), is reshaping digital tourism by enhancing pre-travel engagement, facilitating real-time interactions, and transforming workforce training. These innovations offer new ways for consumers to explore destinations, allowing them to make informed decisions about their travel experiences while reducing uncertainties. However, despite their potential to revolutionize the tourism industry, their adoption remains uneven, reinforcing technological inequalities and limiting access for smaller tourism operators. This imbalance reflects SDG 10, as financial and technical constraints prevent SMEs from fully benefiting from immersive digital tools.
VR and AR technologies enable travelers to engage with destinations before booking by providing interactive previews of hotels, cultural sites, and experiences [66]. AI-driven immersive simulations further enhance these previews by allowing consumers to visualize accommodations, amenities, and even virtual tourist attractions. These tools contribute to SDG 12, as they reduce unnecessary travel, alleviate pressure on over-visited locations, and promote sustainable tourism choices [45]. However, the financial and technical requirements associated with VR/AR create significant accessibility challenges. Large-scale tourism operators and dominant digital platforms have the resources to invest in high-quality VR/AR content, whereas SMEs struggle due to capital constraints and lack of specialized expertise [67]. This further reinforces SDG 10, as well-funded corporations gain a competitive edge in immersive tourism while smaller operators remain excluded from these innovations. Beyond accessibility concerns, AI, big data, and immersive technologies contribute to an increasingly data-driven tourism economy. While multinational corporations continuously invest in AI-powered personalization, smaller operators remain dependent on third-party distribution platforms that control pricing, visibility, and customer engagement [68]. This creates a structural imbalance, where digital leaders consolidate their competitive advantage through superior data capabilities, while SMEs struggle to maintain autonomy within the tourism ecosystem. Addressing this growing digital divide requires targeted policy interventions that facilitate SME access to advanced technologies, encourage digital literacy programs, and implement regulations that prevent monopolistic control over data and AI tools. Expanding access to immersive technology aligns with SDG 9, as it promotes broader technological integration and innovation within tourism.
Proposition 7.
The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies, including AI-driven personalization, and immersive tourism, enhances operational efficiency and customer experience but reinforces economic and technological inequalities in the tourism sector.
To mitigate these technological disparities, digital platforms are integrating more interactive and immersive tools, such as 3D mapping, photorealistic rendering, and AI-enhanced virtual tours. These innovations enhance customer decision-making by providing dynamic, high-resolution previews of destinations, accommodations, and tourist attractions [69]. For instance, platforms like Google’s Arts and Culture offer digital replications of cultural sites, improving accessibility to heritage locations while reducing the environmental impact of travel. These efforts align with SDG 12, as AI-powered digital tourism alternatives support more sustainable travel behaviors by reducing physical congestion at major destinations. Furthermore, digital previews of eco-friendly tourism options promote responsible consumption, encouraging travelers to prioritize low-impact accommodations and services, contributing to SDG 13. However, the scalability of these innovations remains limited, as the high cost of VR-driven marketing tools, AI-powered sustainability tracking, and digital content development prevents widespread adoption. The dominance of well-funded tourism firms in immersive tourism technology creates a competitive divide, restricting access for SMEs and independent service providers. Without broader regulatory support, technological exclusivity will persist, limiting the potential of immersive digital tourism to serve as an inclusive industry-wide innovation. Public-private partnerships and investment incentives could bridge this gap, ensuring that smaller tourism operators can also benefit from digital sustainability tools and immersive marketing solutions.
Proposition 8.
AI-powered and immersive digital platforms enhance sustainable decision-making and reduce overtourism, yet their accessibility remains limited to well-funded operators).
The applications of immersive technologies extend beyond customer engagement and sustainability—they are also transforming workforce training in tourism and hospitality. VR simulations enable employees to practice customer interactions, emergency procedures, and operational scenarios in controlled digital environments, improving service quality and preparedness [70]. These tools offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional training programs, particularly for multinational hospitality chains and large-scale tourism providers. By integrating AR-based guidance systems, hotels and resorts can further optimize real-time service delivery, ensuring that employees receive live, context-specific instructions during customer interactions [60]. These innovations align with SDG 9, as they drive efficiency and innovation within tourism service delivery while reducing resource-intensive training methods. However, similar to the challenges faced in customer-facing applications, VR-based workforce training remains financially inaccessible for many smaller businesses. The high costs associated with VR hardware, software development, and content licensing create entry barriers for independent tourism operators, limiting their ability to compete with larger corporations in talent development. This issue ties into SDG 10, as the digital divide in workforce training mirrors broader inequalities in technology adoption within the tourism industry. Expanding access to VR-based training through subsidized programs, open-source content, and collaborative training initiatives could mitigate these disparities, ensuring that all tourism employees have equal opportunities to develop digital competencies. Moreover, investment in digital workforce training also aligns with SDG 8, as it enhances job preparedness, reduces skill gaps, and promotes workforce adaptability in an increasingly tech-driven tourism sector. By ensuring that employees at all levels—from entry-level hospitality workers to management—have access to immersive training, the industry can foster more equitable opportunities for career progression and professional development.
Proposition 9.
AR and VR platforms expand digital tourism experiences and workforce training, but high implementation costs limit accessibility for smaller operators.
The integration of AI, VR, and AR into tourism presents both opportunities and challenges. While these technologies enhance consumer decision-making, promote sustainable travel, and improve workforce training, their adoption remains concentrated within well-funded tourism firms. Ensuring that digital innovation benefits the entire tourism ecosystem requires policies that promote accessibility, affordability, and inclusivity in immersive tourism technologies. Governments and industry stakeholders must work together to establish funding mechanisms, encourage knowledge-sharing initiatives, and regulate digital market concentration to prevent further economic disparities. Expanding access to VR-based workforce training and AI-driven immersive tourism aligns with SDG 9, SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 13.

4.4. Digital Sustainability and Responsible Tourism Innovations

Digital platforms are fundamentally reshaping tourism by embedding sustainability into multiple stages of the travel experience. By leveraging AI, big data, VR, and AR, these platforms facilitate eco-conscious decision-making and encourage collaboration among travelers, businesses, and policymakers [71,72]. Their ability to optimize travel planning, enhance in-destination experiences, and promote post-travel environmental engagement contributes to the emergence of more sustainable tourism models. These innovations support SDG 9 by integrating advanced technologies to improve sustainability across the tourism sector and SDG 13 by reducing tourism-related carbon emissions. However, their effectiveness remains contingent on the accessibility of digital infrastructure, regulatory oversight, and equitable integration of sustainability-driven tools, which aligns with SDG 10 by ensuring that all tourism operators, including SMEs in developing economies, can benefit from these innovations.
A major driver of digital sustainability is user-generated content, which plays a crucial role in shaping consumer choices and encouraging responsible tourism behavior. Digital platforms aggregate traveler-generated photos, videos, and reviews, providing a rich repository of experiential knowledge that increases transparency and enables informed decision-making [73]. This aligns with SDG 12 by directing tourists toward eco-friendly accommodations, carbon-conscious travel options, and locally responsible tourism providers. However, conventional static content often lacks real-time interactivity, reducing its ability to actively influence sustainability-driven decisions [70]. Furthermore, the rise of unverified peer-driven reviews raises concerns about greenwashing, where businesses exaggerate or fabricate their sustainability credentials to attract eco-conscious travelers. This underscores the necessity of stronger governance frameworks under SDG 16, which aims to ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical business practices within the tourism sector.
During travel, as shown in Figure 2, digital platforms integrate AI-driven sustainability features that guide tourists toward environmentally responsible behaviors in real time [74,75]. AI-powered transportation tools, such as Google Maps’ eco-routing feature, optimize routes to minimize carbon emissions, directly supporting SDG 13. AR applications enhance visitor experiences by providing interactive historical and cultural insights, fostering SDG 11 through the conservation of cultural heritage and deeper local engagement [67,76]. In parallel, AI-driven waste management systems use predictive analytics to improve resource efficiency in tourism hotspots such as hotels, airports, and heritage sites, supporting SDG 12 by promoting waste reduction and SDG 9 by optimizing urban tourism infrastructure [45]. However, the widespread implementation of AI-based sustainability tools is constrained by disparities in digital infrastructure, particularly in developing countries, limiting the ability of all stakeholders to benefit from these innovations. This highlights the interplay between SDG 9 and SDG 10, as unequal access to digital tools restricts sustainability adoption and reinforces global inequalities in tourism development.
Proposition 10.
AI-driven real-time tools enable resource efficiency and lower tourism’s environmental impact, but their implementation depends on digital infrastructure readiness.
Post-travel digital platforms reinforce sustainability commitments by encouraging travelers to document, share, and reflect on their eco-friendly behaviors. Platforms such as TerraPass (https://terrapass.co.uk/, accessed on 30 December 2024) allow users to offset their carbon emissions, contributing directly to SDG 13 by incentivizing sustainable travel decisions. Additionally, AI-powered feedback loops enable tourism platforms to analyze traveler preferences and continuously refine sustainable tourism offerings, reinforcing a cyclical process where user engagement fosters future eco-conscious travel decisions [77]. This supports SDG 12 by encouraging responsible tourism choices and promoting long-term environmental accountability. Virtual tourism, driven by VR-based and metaverse-integrated platforms, represents a frontier in sustainable digital travel solutions. These technologies allow users to explore destinations remotely, reducing the need for physical travel while preserving fragile ecosystems [25]. VR-based previews of destinations enable travelers to engage with cultural and natural heritage sites before making travel decisions, minimizing unnecessary long-haul flights and alleviating overtourism, which supports SDG 9 and SDG 13 by reducing tourism-related carbon footprints [66]. However, VR-driven tourism remains financially and technologically intensive, requiring significant investment in hardware, software, and high-quality immersive content development. The high costs associated with these technologies create barriers for SMEs and tourism providers in emerging markets, aligning with SDG 10. It is imperative to underscore that training, sustaining, and operating AI models necessitates substantial energy consumption, which can have adverse environmental consequences and hinder progress toward SDG 13. Without targeted investments in digital infrastructure and open-access VR tourism platforms, the benefits of metaverse-driven tourism will remain concentrated among technologically advanced economies, increasing inequalities in the tourism sector.
Proposition 11.
The expansion of VR and metaverse-driven tourism reduces carbon footprints and alleviates overtourism, but its accessibility remains constrained by financial and technological barriers.
Beyond AI and VR-driven solutions, digital platforms play a pivotal role in shaping eco-conscious travel behaviors through sustainability certifications, responsible tourism labels, and carbon offsetting mechanisms. Many platforms now incorporate sustainability filters that allow travelers to select accommodations, airlines, and experiences based on their environmental impact. AI-powered recommendation algorithms further prioritize green-certified accommodations, community-based tourism initiatives, and low-carbon travel options, aligning with SDG 12 by guiding travelers toward more sustainable choices. However, the increasing prevalence of self-reported sustainability claims without independent verification raises concerns about greenwashing. Many tourism businesses lack external auditing, which allows them to exaggerate their sustainability credentials [66]. While digital platforms offer valuable tools for promoting responsible tourism, stronger governance mechanisms are needed to ensure transparency in sustainability certifications. The adoption of blockchain-based tracking systems for sustainability claims and mandatory third-party audits for eco-certifications could enhance consumer trust and credibility, reinforcing SDG 16.
Proposition 12.
Digital platforms promote sustainable tourism through eco-certifications and responsible travel options, but stronger verification mechanisms are needed to prevent greenwashing and ensure consumer trust.
Parallel to AI-driven decision-making and sustainability certifications, the integration of IoT-based environmental monitoring solutions is shaping the future of responsible tourism. Smart sensors and AI-powered energy management systems are being deployed in hotels and resorts to optimize water consumption, energy efficiency, and waste reduction [34]. Automated sustainability monitoring systems, already implemented by high-end hospitality brands, track carbon footprints and ensure compliance with environmental regulations [17]. These innovations support SDG 12 by reducing the resource intensity of tourism operations and ensuring compliance with sustainability regulations. However, the financial burden of adopting IoT-based sustainability solutions remains a significant barrier for smaller tourism operators, particularly in emerging markets. The lack of standardized sustainability metrics further complicates industry-wide accountability efforts. To ensure that IoT-driven environmental innovations benefit the entire sector, establishing universal sustainability standards and financial incentives for green digital adoption will be critical, reinforcing SDG 9 and SDG 10.
Proposition 13.
Digital platforms incorporating IoT-driven sustainability solutions enhance environmental responsibility, but their implementation requires industry-wide cooperation and policy alignment.
The future of sustainable digital tourism depends on balancing technological innovation with equitable adoption. While AI, VR, and IoT-based sustainability tools offer transformative potential, their accessibility challenges and regulatory gaps must be addressed to ensure that responsible tourism innovations benefit the entire industry. Policymakers and industry leaders must collaborate to establish financial incentives, enhance regulatory frameworks, and promote knowledge-sharing initiatives that facilitate the adoption of sustainability-driven digital tools across diverse tourism markets.

4.5. Data Security, Governance, and Trust in Digital Tourism

Digital platforms have become indispensable to modern tourism, offering AI-driven personalization, data analytics, and blockchain-based security solutions that enhance customer experiences and operational efficiency. However, as these technologies expand, concerns regarding data privacy, governance, and consumer trust have intensified. Many small tourism operators struggle with financial and technical barriers to implementing AI-powered sustainability tracking or digital marketing tools, widening inequalities in digital adoption [66]. This highlights the link to SDG 10, as disparities in access to AI-driven tools reinforce existing digital divides between well-resourced multinational platforms and smaller independent tourism operators. In parallel, the vast amount of personal consumer data collected by tourism platforms—including travel history, purchasing patterns, and behavioral analytics—has raised significant concerns about data misuse, algorithmic biases, and privacy breaches. Without appropriate governance mechanisms, these same technological advancements that enhance efficiency could also erode consumer trust, create unfair market conditions, and expose users to risks of digital exploitation. This necessitates stronger regulatory oversight, standardized ethical frameworks, and collaboration among technology providers, policymakers, and tourism businesses to ensure responsible digital governance. Ensuring transparency and consumer protection in data usage aligns with SDG 16, which emphasizes institutional accountability and ethical governance.
One of the most pressing concerns in digital tourism governance is data privacy. AI-driven platforms rely heavily on predictive analytics to personalize services, optimize pricing, and enhance user experiences. However, this extensive reliance on consumer data increases risks related to unauthorized data collection, surveillance, and potential security breaches. Privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union have attempted to establish legal safeguards for data protection, ensuring that consumers have greater control over their digital footprints. However, enforcement remains inconsistent across jurisdictions and platform models [78]. Many digital platforms operate across multiple countries, making compliance with fragmented regulatory frameworks a challenge. Without harmonized international data protection standards, gaps in enforcement could increase consumer vulnerability to data exploitation, reinforcing SDG 16, which advocates for strong regulatory institutions and transparent governance. Another emerging issue is algorithmic bias in AI-driven personalization. The integration of AI-powered behavioral tracking has enabled digital platforms to dynamically adjust pricing based on users’ browsing history, location, or purchasing behavior. While this enhances revenue optimization, it raises ethical concerns about pricing discrimination, potentially leading to economic exclusion for certain consumer segments. Travelers with lower digital literacy or bargaining power may unknowingly pay higher rates, reinforcing inequalities in tourism accessibility. Addressing this issue aligns with SDG 10, as opaque pricing models disproportionately impact vulnerable consumers and exacerbate economic disparities in digital tourism. Without regulatory oversight, AI-driven pricing risks deepening market imbalances, reducing consumer trust in digital platforms, and distorting competition. To mitigate these challenges, strengthening ethical AI policies, increasing transparency in data usage, and expanding consumer control over digital data will be essential. Ensuring compliance with internationally recognized data protection frameworks such as GDPR and expanding such policies globally would be critical in mitigating risks related to privacy violations and algorithmic bias. These efforts support SDG 9, as they promote resilient and secure digital ecosystems while ensuring that technological innovation is aligned with ethical standards.
Proposition 14.
Digital platforms enhance customer personalization through AI and data analytics, but stronger data privacy regulations are needed to protect consumers from misuse and security breaches.
Beyond data privacy, security risks related to financial transactions and digital identity verification have emerged as key governance challenges in tourism platforms. The increasing reliance on online bookings, digital payments, and customer loyalty programs has heightened the need for secure and transparent transactions. Blockchain technology has emerged as a potential solution, enabling decentralized and tamper-proof transaction systems. Through smart contracts, blockchain-powered platforms can automate and secure hotel bookings, cross-border payments, and loyalty rewards, reducing fraud risks and ensuring transaction integrity [79]. By facilitating secure identity verification, blockchain enhances security for international travelers, eliminating redundant identity checks across multiple platforms, streamlining booking processes, and reducing exposure to data breaches [19]. The potential of blockchain-based security solutions aligns with SDG 9, which advocates for digital resilience and secure financial technologies. However, despite these advantages, blockchain technology remains largely unregulated in the tourism sector. Many countries lack standardized policies for blockchain adoption, creating uncertainty regarding consumer rights, the enforceability of smart contracts, and liability in digital transactions. Furthermore, while blockchain enhances security, it does not eliminate the need for broader cybersecurity measures, particularly in cases where blockchain networks interact with traditional digital payment systems. To ensure responsible blockchain adoption, regulatory frameworks must evolve to establish standardized guidelines for decentralized transactions and digital identity verification. Tourism platforms should collaborate with financial regulators to develop interoperable blockchain solutions that align with international data protection laws. Strengthening governance around blockchain adoption will increase trust and security in digital tourism transactions, aligning with SDG 16, which prioritizes accountability and secure institutions. Moreover, blockchain’s ability to facilitate financial inclusion in global tourism markets directly supports SDG 10, as it can lower transaction costs and improve accessibility for underserved travelers and small tourism operators.
Proposition 15.
Blockchain-enabled digital platforms improve transactional security and transparency, but regulatory oversight is needed to standardize adoption and prevent misuse.
The expansion of digital tourism will continue to depend on the ability of platforms to build trust through ethical data governance, transparent AI decision-making, and secure financial transactions. The successful implementation of AI-driven technologies underscores their potential to significantly reshape customer experiences and service delivery, creating pathways toward more personalized, efficient, and competitive tourism offerings [80,81,82,83,84]. As digital tourism grows, ensuring that innovation aligns with responsible governance and ethical standards will be key to maintaining consumer confidence and protecting the integrity of platform-driven travel experiences. A summary of the main impacts is shown in Figure 3.

5. Conclusions and Policy Implications

5.1. Conclusions

This study underscores the transformative impact of digital platforms in promoting sustainable tourism within the Industry 4.0 context. Leveraging advanced technologies such as AI, blockchain, VR, AR, and IoT, digital tourism platforms significantly enhance travel personalization, operational efficiency, and environmentally responsible practices. These technologies have the potential to optimize resource use, reduce operational waste, and improve the overall sustainability of tourism operations. However, alongside these benefits, digital transformation introduces considerable challenges, including market centralization, algorithmic bias, economic inequalities, data privacy risks, and uneven accessibility, particularly impacting SMEs.
To fully realize the potential of digital platforms in aligning tourism practices with the SDGs, robust governance structures and comprehensive regulatory frameworks are necessary. It is essential to implement inclusive strategies that address ethical considerations, mitigate structural inequalities, and ensure transparency and equity across different tourism markets. Policymakers should prioritize investments in digital infrastructure, especially in less developed regions, to bridge technological gaps and support SMEs. Additionally, targeted policy interventions, multi-stakeholder collaboration, capacity-building initiatives, and proactive management strategies will be crucial in harnessing digital innovations to foster sustainable, resilient, and inclusive tourism development in the Industry 4.0 era. Ultimately, achieving these outcomes will depend on continuous monitoring, adaptive regulatory mechanisms, and sustained stakeholder engagement across the tourism ecosystem.

5.2. Policy and Managerial Recommendations

Aligned with the findings presented, several policy and managerial actions are recommended to maximize the potential of digital platforms in fostering sustainable tourism while addressing economic and technological disparities within the industry. First, governments should prioritize investments in digital infrastructure to ensure equitable access to advanced Industry 4.0 technologies, particularly in developing regions and remote destinations. Enhancing connectivity and digital accessibility will empower smaller operators to leverage digital innovation, promoting inclusive growth. Second, regulatory frameworks should be strengthened to address market concentration, algorithmic fairness, and the risks associated with dependency on dominant platforms. Policymakers must establish clear antitrust guidelines and transparency measures for pricing algorithms to protect SMEs from unfair competition and market exclusion. Third, targeted financial incentives, including subsidies, grants, and tax reliefs, should be introduced by governments to support SMEs in adopting and integrating digital technologies such as AI, VR, AR, IoT, and blockchain. These measures should be coupled with capacity-building and digital literacy training initiatives to enable smaller tourism businesses to compete effectively and sustainably in a digitally driven marketplace. Fourth, comprehensive data governance policies must be enforced to safeguard consumer privacy, ensure ethical AI applications, and secure digital transactions. Harmonization of data protection standards internationally, akin to GDPR, alongside responsible blockchain integration, will enhance consumer trust, mitigate risks of data misuse, and strengthen transactional security. Fifth, policymakers and industry leaders should collaborate on standardizing sustainability metrics and certifications integrated into digital platforms, backed by third-party verification mechanisms. Adopting transparent blockchain-based tracking solutions will help mitigate greenwashing risks, reinforce responsible consumer choices, and contribute to achieving sustainability targets aligned with the SDGs. Sixth, proactive investment in workforce reskilling programs and digital training initiatives is essential to prepare employees for Industry 4.0-driven changes. Strategic partnerships between public institutions, educational entities, and private companies can facilitate the adoption of VR and AR-based training tools, ensuring inclusive and equitable opportunities for workforce development across the tourism sector. Finally, fostering cross-sector collaborations and creating innovation-driven ecosystems involving public-private partnerships and knowledge-sharing platforms is crucial. Establishing dedicated innovation hubs focused on sustainability can accelerate technological diffusion, enable collective resource utilization, and support the entire tourism industry in transitioning toward sustainable and inclusive digital transformation.

5.3. Limitations and Future Research

This study provides a conceptual examination of digital tourism platforms and their transformative potential in advancing sustainable development goals within the tourism sector. However, it acknowledges several limitations. Firstly, the propositions and conceptual framework developed in this study are based solely on theoretical integration and literature synthesis, thus lacking empirical validation. Future research should empirically test and validate these propositions using case studies, surveys, or quantitative analyses. Secondly, although this paper discusses the potential environmental benefits of advanced digital technologies such as AI, IoT, and blockchain, it explicitly recognizes the limitations related to evaluating the full environmental impact of these technologies. Specifically, the energy consumption and resource intensity associated with the development, training, and maintenance of AI infrastructure are significant concerns that this conceptual study does not empirically address. Consequently, further studies should explicitly assess the net sustainability impacts, including the hidden environmental costs of these technologies, to provide comprehensive insights. Thirdly, this research broadly covers multiple digital technologies and sustainability dimensions without considering detailed contextual factors. Therefore, subsequent studies should examine how local regulatory environments, market dynamics, and socio-economic conditions in different geographic regions shape the adoption, effectiveness, and sustainability outcomes of digital tourism platforms. Fourthly, while the paper acknowledges the risks of increasing inequalities due to technological disparities between affluent and economically disadvantaged tourist regions, it does not empirically investigate these effects. Future research should explicitly explore how advanced technology adoption impacts inequality, particularly examining disparities between resource-rich and resource-poor destinations. Lastly, this paper highlights emerging ethical and governance challenges, including algorithmic bias, digital monopolies, and data privacy concerns, but provides conceptual insights only. Future empirical research is recommended to rigorously explore these ethical dimensions and governance challenges, focusing on regulatory frameworks, accountability mechanisms, and their effectiveness in balancing technological innovation with sustainable and equitable tourism outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Methodology, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Software, A.Z. and A.B.Y.; Validation, A.Z. and A.B.Y.; Formal analysis, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Investigation, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Resources, A.Z. and A.B.Y.; Writing—original draft, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Writing—review & editing, A.Z., A.B.Y. and T.M.Z.; Visualization, A.Z. and A.B.Y.; Supervision, A.B.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gonçalves, A.R.; Dorsch, L.L.P.; Figueiredo, M. Digital Tourism: An Alternative View on Cultural Intangible Heritage and Sustainability in Tavira, Portugal. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kurnaz, H.A.; Ön, F.; Yüksel, F. A New Age in Tourist Guiding: Digital Tourism and Sustainability. In Sustainability, Big Data, and Corporate Social Responsibility; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; Ön, F. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tiago, F.; Gil, A.; Stemberger, S.; Borges-Tiago, T. Digital sustainability communication in tourism. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akhtar, N.; Khan, N.; Mahroof Khan, M.; Ashraf, S.; Hashmi, M.S.; Khan, M.M.; Hishan, S.S. Post-COVID-19 tourism: Will digital tourism replace mass tourism? Sustainability 2021, 13, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mia, M.R.; Hossain, S.S.; Toma, T.R.; Mahmud, I.; Roy, J. Usability testing of tourism apps in Bangladesh. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 2793–2797. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wynn, M.; Jones, P. Digital Technology Deployment and the Circular Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niñerola, A.; Sánchez-Rebull, M.V.; Hernández-Lara, A.B. Tourism research on sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Making Tourism More Sustainable: A Guide for Policy Makers; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kenney, M.; Zysman, J. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ben Youssef, A. Introducing platforms: A transdisciplinary journal on platform management, services, and policy and all related research. Platforms 2023, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dahmani, M.; Ben Youssef, A. Unraveling the determinants of platform economy adoption in developing countries: An extended application of the UTAUT2 model with a privacy calculus perspective. Platforms 2023, 1, 34–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeqiri, A. From Traditional to Digital: The Evolution of Business Models in Hospitality Through Platforms. Platforms 2024, 2, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2015; Available online: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284417254 (accessed on 22 December 2024).
  14. Law, R.; Leung, K.; Wong, R. The impact of the internet on travel agencies. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2004, 16, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ben Youssef, A.; Mejri, I. Linking digital technologies to sustainability through Industry 5.0: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gössling, S.; Hall, C.M. Sharing versus collaborative economy: How to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism? J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 74–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nikopoulou, M.; Kourouthanassis, P.; Chasapi, G.; Pateli, A.; Mylonas, N. Determinants of digital transformation in the hospitality industry: Technological, organizational, and environmental drivers. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gawer, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kazantsev, N.; Martens, I. Industry 4.0 digital platforms: Collaborative business models for SMEs. In Digital Business Models in Industrial Ecosystems: Lessons Learned from Industry 4.0 Across Europe; Voigt, K.-I., Müller, J.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Y.; Zhang, N.; Cheng, X. The spillover effects of online tourism platforms on sustainable development. Inf. Syst. J. 2024, 34, 788–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaur, R.; Saini, A.; Singh, S. The role of digital tourism platforms in sustainable tourism development. In The Need for Sustainable Tourism in an Era of Global Climate Change: Pathway to a Greener Future; Singh, P., Daga, S., Yadav, K., Jain, A., Eds.; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2024; pp. 195–214. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mariani, M.; Borghi, M. Exploring environmental concerns on digital platforms through big data: The effect of online consumers’ environmental discourse on online review ratings. J. Sustain. Tour. 2023, 31, 2592–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ben Youssef, A.; Redžepagić, S.; Zeqiri, A. The key changes to the hospitality business model under COVID-19. Strateg. Manag. 2022, 27, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  24. Palacios-Florencio, B.; Santos-Roldán, L.; Berbel-Pineda, J.M.; Castillo-Canalejo, A.M. Sustainable tourism as a driving force of the tourism industry in a post-COVID-19 scenario. Soc. Indic. Res. 2021, 158, 991–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeqiri, A. Virtual tourism as a substitute for physical tourism during COVID-19 pandemic. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2024, 26, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fauzi, M.A. Sustainable tourism and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A state-of-the-art review of past, present, and future trends. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 27, 2841–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, W.S. Climate change and tourism sustainability in Jeju Island landscape. Sustainability 2023, 15, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahendru, M.; Arora, V.; Chatterjee, R.; Sharma, G.D.; Shahzadi, I. From overtourism to under-tourism via COVID-19: Lessons for sustainable tourism management. Eval. Rev. 2024, 48, 177–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Firman, A.; Moslehpour, M.; Qiu, R.F.; Lin, P.K.; Ismail, T.; Rahman, F.F. The impact of eco-innovation, ecotourism policy, and social media on sustainable tourism development: Evidence from the tourism sector of Indonesia. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2022, 36, 2143847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chandran, C.; Bhattacharya, P. Tourist’s level of awareness and attitude about destination ecotourism development: A case study of Munnar, Kerala, India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 26, 26607–26622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Amrullah, K.; Kaltum, U.; Sondari, M.C.; Pranita, D. The influence of capability, business innovation, and competitive advantage on a smart sustainable tourism village and its impact on the management performance of tourism villages on Java Island. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, H.B.; Ayamba, E.C.; Udimal, T.B.; Agyemang, A.O.; Ruth, A. Tourism and sustainable development in China: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 39077–39093. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wut, T.M.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.W. Does attitude or intention affect behavior in sustainable tourism? A review and research agenda. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ben Youssef, A.; Zeqiri, A. Hospitality industry 4.0 and climate change. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2022, 2, 1043–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hall, C.M. Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 649–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Scott, D. Why sustainable tourism must address climate change. J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cooper, C. Sustainability and tourism visions. In Companion to Tourism; Lew, A., Hall, C.M., Williams, A., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 321–334. [Google Scholar]
  38. McKercher, B.; Prideaux, B. Issues in sustainable tourism research. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 381–394. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tronvoll, B.; Edvardsson, B. Explaining how platforms foster innovation in service ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rietveld, J.; Schilling, M.A. Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Manag. 2020, 47, 1528–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vlassis, A. Platform governance and the politics of media regulation: The review of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive. J. Digit. Media Policy 2023, 14, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rohn, D.; Bican, P.M.; Brem, A.; Kraus, S.; Clauss, T. Digital platform-based business models—An exploration of critical success factors. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2021, 60, 101625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guttentag, D. Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Curr. Issues Tour. 2015, 18, 1192–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xiang, Z.; Magnini, V.P.; Fesenmaier, D.R. Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: Insights from travel planning using the internet. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 22, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scheyvens, R.; Biddulph, R. Inclusive tourism development. Tour. Geogr. 2018, 20, 589–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qiu, L.; Li, X.; Choi, S. Exploring the influence of short video platforms on tourist attitudes and travel intention: A social–technical perspective. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2024, 31, 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Buhalis, D.; Harwood, T.; Bogicevic, V.; Viglia, G.; Beldona, S.; Hofacker, C. Technological disruptions in services: Lessons from tourism and hospitality. J. Serv. Manag. 2019, 30, 484–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Evans, D.S.; Schmalensee, R. Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms; Harvard Business Review Press: Brighton, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cocola-Gant, A.; Gago, A. Airbnb, buy-to-let investment and tourism-driven displacement: A case study in Lisbon. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2019, 51, 1371–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jaakkola, E. Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Rev. 2020, 10, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. MacInnis, D.J. A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Assiouras, I.; Laserer, C.; Buhalis, D. The evolution of artificial empathy in the hospitality metaverse era. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 126, 104063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Triarchi, E.; Karamanis, K. The evolution of alternative forms of tourism: A theoretical background. Bus. Entrep. J. 2017, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  54. Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teece, D.J. The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2014, 28, 328–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Teece, D.J. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1367–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lv, X.; Li, N.; Xu, X.; Yang, Y. Understanding the emergence and development of online travel agencies: A dynamic evaluation and simulation approach. Internet Res. 2020, 30, 1783–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zeqiri, A.; Mejri, I.; Ben Youssef, A. Metaverse and virtual reality in tourism and hospitality: A bibliometric study and a research agenda. GREDEG Working Paper 2024. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adelina-Zeqiri/publication/382910279_The_Metaverse_and_Virtual_Reality_in_Tourism_and_Hospitality_50_A_Bibliometric_Study_and_a_Research_Agenda/links/66b2556a2361f42f23b8e5dd/The-Metaverse-and-Virtual-Reality-in-Tourism-and-Hospitality-50-A-Bibliometric-Study-and-a-Research-Agenda.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2024).
  59. Veile, J.W.; Schmidt, M.-C.; Voigt, K.-I. Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 143, 387–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gursoy, D.; Li, Y.; Song, H. ChatGPT and the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2023, 32, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iranmanesh, M.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Nilashi, M.; Tseng, M.-L.; Yadegaridehkordi, E.; Leung, N. Applications of disruptive digital technologies in the hotel industry: A systematic review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 107, 103304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ben Youssef, A.; Dahmani, M.; Zeqiri, A. Do e-skills enhance use of e-services in the hospitality industry? A conditional mixed-process approach. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2021, 5, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Balsiger, P.; Jammet, T.; Cianferoni, N.; Surdez, M. Coping with digital market re-organization: How the hotel industry strategically responds to digital platform power. Compet. Change 2023, 27, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Busulwa, R.; Pickering, M.; Mao, I. Digital transformation and hospitality management competencies: Toward an integrative framework. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 102, 103132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Perelygina, M.; Küçükusta, D.; Law, R. Digital business model configurations in the travel industry. Tour. Manag. 2022, 88, 104408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Buhalis, D.; Leung, R. Smart hospitality—Interconnectivity and interoperability towards an ecosystem. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Buhalis, D.; Karatay, N. Mixed reality for Generation Z in cultural heritage tourism towards Metaverse. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2022; Stienmetz, J.L., Ferrer-Rosell, B., Massimo, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 16–27. [Google Scholar]
  68. Go, H.; Kang, M. Metaverse tourism for sustainable tourism development: Tourism agenda 2030. Tour. Rev. 2022, 78, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Ribeiro-Navarrete, S.; Giannakis, M.; Al-Debei, M.M.; Dennehy, D.; Metri, B.; Buhalis, D.; Wamba, F. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 66, 102542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alyahya, M.; McLean, G. Examining tourism consumers’ attitudes and the role of sensory information in virtual reality experiences of a tourist destination. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 1666–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tsai, S. Investigating metaverse marketing for travel and tourism. J. Vacat. Mark. 2022, 30, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Buhalis, D. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing. Tour. Manag. 2023, 97, 104724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Meier, A.; Gilbert, A.; Börner, S.; Possler, D. Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. J. Commun. 2020, 70, 721–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zeqiri, A.; Dahmani, M.; Ben Youssef, A. Digitalization of the tourism industry: What are the impacts of the new wave of technologies? Balk. Econ. Rev. 2020, 2, 63–82. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zeqiri, A.; Dahmani, M.; Ben Youssef, A. Determinants of the use of e-services in the hospitality industry in Kosovo. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2021, 5, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zeqiri, A.; Dahmani, M.; Maherzi, T. The city as a service: Unlocking the potential of augmented reality in tourism and hospitality. In AI, Blockchain, and Metaverse in Hospitality and Tourism Industry 4.0: Case Studies and Analysis; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 118–129. [Google Scholar]
  77. Filimonau, V.; Dickinson, J.; Robbins, D. The carbon impact of short-haul tourism: A case study of UK travel to Southern France using life cycle analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 64, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Verevka, T.V. Development of Industry 4.0 in the hotel and restaurant business. IBIMA Bus. Rev. 2019, 2019, 324071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ratna, S.; Saide, S.; Putri, A.M.; Indrajit, R.E.; Muwardi, D. Digital transformation in tourism and hospitality industry: A literature review of blockchain, financial technology, and knowledge management. EuroMed J. Bus. 2023, 19, 84–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bulchand-Gidumal, J. Impact of artificial intelligence in travel, tourism, and hospitality. In Handbook of e-Tourism; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1943–1962. [Google Scholar]
  81. Filieri, R.; D’Amico, E.; Destefanis, A.; Paolucci, E.; Raguseo, E. Artificial intelligence (AI) for tourism: An European-based study on successful AI tourism start-ups. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 4099–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ghouse, S.M.; Chaudhary, M. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Tourism Start-Ups. In Innovative Technologies for Increasing Service Productivity; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 161–178. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sahani, G.; Chaudhary, M.; Ghouse, S.M.M. Artificial Intelligence and Hyper-Personalisation in Travel Platforms. In AI Technologies for Personalized and Sustainable Tourism; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 149–180. [Google Scholar]
  84. Solakis, K.; Katsoni, V.; Mahmoud, A.B.; Grigoriou, N. Factors affecting value co-creation through artificial intelligence in tourism: A general literature review. J. Tour. Futures 2024, 10, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework (Source: Authors).
Figure 1. Conceptual framework (Source: Authors).
Sustainability 17 03482 g001
Figure 2. Tourism sustainable practices using digital platforms (Source: Authors).
Figure 2. Tourism sustainable practices using digital platforms (Source: Authors).
Sustainability 17 03482 g002
Figure 3. The impact of digital tourism platforms in SDGs in industry 4.0 era (Source: Authors).
Figure 3. The impact of digital tourism platforms in SDGs in industry 4.0 era (Source: Authors).
Sustainability 17 03482 g003
Table 1. Key issues and strategies for managing Industry 4.0 technologies in the tourism industry.
Table 1. Key issues and strategies for managing Industry 4.0 technologies in the tourism industry.
Transformation AreaDescriptionChallengesOpportunities
Data-driven innovationLeveraging big data analytics to tailor services, optimize operations, and enhance the customer experience.Privacy concerns, regulatory challenges, potential for monopolistic behavior by dominant platforms.Improved customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and personalized marketing.
AI and roboticsImplementing AI for customer service (e.g., chatbots), inventory management, predictive maintenance, and robotics for routine tasks.Job displacement, socio-economic impacts, and ethical concerns about the transparency of AI decision-making.Increased efficiency, consistent service quality, and innovative customer interactions.
Virtual worlds and the metaverseLeveraging VR and AR for virtual tours, immersive experiences, and virtual events to transform travel planning and customer engagement.High investment costs, ensuring accessibility and inclusivity, heightened data security and privacy concerns.Increased customer loyalty, new marketing opportunities, and reduced environmental impact through virtual tourism.
Sustainability initiativesAdopting sustainable practices such as renewable energy, waste reduction programs, and green technologies to attract environmentally conscious travelers.High initial investment costs, difficulty for smaller operators to compete, regulatory compliance.Long-term cost savings, enhanced brand reputation, increased customer loyalty, and alignment with global sustainability goals.
Source: Authors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeqiri, A.; Ben Youssef, A.; Maherzi Zahar, T. The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083482

AMA Style

Zeqiri A, Ben Youssef A, Maherzi Zahar T. The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era. Sustainability. 2025; 17(8):3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeqiri, Adelina, Adel Ben Youssef, and Teja Maherzi Zahar. 2025. "The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era" Sustainability 17, no. 8: 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083482

APA Style

Zeqiri, A., Ben Youssef, A., & Maherzi Zahar, T. (2025). The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era. Sustainability, 17(8), 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop