Next Article in Journal
Continuity of MODIS and VIIRS Snow Cover Extent Data Products for Development of an Earth Science Data Record
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Detection of Ganoderma boninense in Oil Palm Seedlings Using Support Vector Machines
Previous Article in Journal
GEO–GEO Stereo-Tracking of Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) from the Geostationary Ring
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Machine Learning for Estimating Rice Chlorophyll Content from In Situ Hyperspectral Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status Estimation Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery and Gaussian Processes Regression

1
Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
3
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China
4
School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
5
Beijing Research Center of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(22), 3778; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223778
Submission received: 26 September 2020 / Revised: 3 November 2020 / Accepted: 16 November 2020 / Published: 18 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture)

Abstract

Predicting the crop nitrogen (N) nutrition status is critical for optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application. The present study examined the ability of multiple image features derived from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) RGB images for winter wheat N status estimation across multiple critical growth stages. The image features consisted of RGB-based vegetation indices (VIs), color parameters, and textures, which represented image features of different aspects and different types. To determine which N status indicators could be well-estimated, we considered two mass-based N status indicators (i.e., the leaf N concentration (LNC) and plant N concentration (PNC)) and two area-based N status indicators (i.e., the leaf N density (LND) and plant N density (PND)). Sixteen RGB-based VIs associated with crop growth were selected. Five color space models, including RGB, HSV, L*a*b*, L*c*h*, and L*u*v*, were used to quantify the winter wheat canopy color. The combination of Gaussian processes regression (GPR) and Gabor-based textures with four orientations and five scales was proposed to estimate the winter wheat N status. The gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based textures with four orientations were extracted for comparison. The heterogeneity in the textures of different orientations was evaluated using the measures of mean and coefficient of variation (CV). The variable importance in projection (VIP) derived from partial least square regression (PLSR) and a band analysis tool based on Gaussian processes regression (GPR-BAT) were used to identify the best performing image features for the N status estimation. The results indicated that (1) the combination of RGB-based VIs or color parameters only could produce reliable estimates of PND and the GPR model based on the combination of color parameters yielded a higher accuracy for the estimation of PND (R2val = 0.571, RMSEval = 2.846 g/m2, and RPDval = 1.532), compared to that based on the combination of RGB-based VIs; (2) there was no significant heterogeneity in the textures of different orientations and the textures of 45 degrees were recommended in the winter wheat N status estimation; (3) compared with the RGB-based VIs and color parameters, the GPR model based on the Gabor-based textures produced a higher accuracy for the estimation of PND (R2val = 0.675, RMSEval = 2.493 g/m2, and RPDval = 1.748) and the PLSR model based on the GLCM-based textures produced a higher accuracy for the estimation of PNC (R2val = 0.612, RMSEval = 0.380%, and RPDval = 1.601); and (4) the combined use of RGB-based VIs, color parameters, and textures produced comparable estimation results to using textures alone. Both VIP-PLSR and GPR-BAT analyses confirmed that image textures contributed most to the estimation of winter wheat N status. The experimental results reveal the potential of image textures derived from high-definition UAV-based RGB images for the estimation of the winter wheat N status. They also suggest that a conventional low-cost digital camera mounted on a UAV could be well-suited for winter wheat N status monitoring in a fast and non-destructive way.
Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle; winter wheat; nitrogen status indicators; color space models; Gabor-based textures; Gaussian processes regression unmanned aerial vehicle; winter wheat; nitrogen status indicators; color space models; Gabor-based textures; Gaussian processes regression

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.; Yang, G.; Li, Z.; Song, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, C. Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status Estimation Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery and Gaussian Processes Regression. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3778. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223778

AMA Style

Fu Y, Yang G, Li Z, Song X, Li Z, Xu X, Wang P, Zhao C. Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status Estimation Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery and Gaussian Processes Regression. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(22):3778. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Yuanyuan, Guijun Yang, Zhenhai Li, Xiaoyu Song, Zhenhong Li, Xingang Xu, Pei Wang, and Chunjiang Zhao. 2020. "Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status Estimation Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery and Gaussian Processes Regression" Remote Sensing 12, no. 22: 3778. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223778

APA Style

Fu, Y., Yang, G., Li, Z., Song, X., Li, Z., Xu, X., Wang, P., & Zhao, C. (2020). Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status Estimation Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery and Gaussian Processes Regression. Remote Sensing, 12(22), 3778. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop