Next Article in Journal
Combining Radar and Optical Imagery to Map Oil Palm Plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia, Using the Google Earth Engine
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Landfast Sea Ice Ridging near UtqiaġVik Alaska Using TanDEM-X Interferometry
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Hierarchical Gaussian Mixture Model for High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity of Arctic Sea Ice Extent to Sea Ice Concentration Threshold Choice and Its Implication to Ice Coverage Decadal Trends and Statistical Projections
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Satellite Observations for Detecting and Forecasting Sea-Ice Conditions: A Summary of Advances Made in the SPICES Project by the EU’s Horizon 2020 Programme

Remote Sens. 2020, 12(7), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071214
by Marko Mäkynen 1,*, Jari Haapala 1, Giuseppe Aulicino 2, Beena Balan-Sarojini 3, Magdalena Balmaseda 3, Alexandru Gegiuc 1, Fanny Girard-Ardhuin 4, Stefan Hendricks 5, Georg Heygster 6, Larysa Istomina 5, Lars Kaleschke 5, Juha Karvonen 1, Thomas Krumpen 5, Mikko Lensu 1, Michael Mayer 3,7, Flavio Parmiggiani 8, Robert Ricker 4,5, Eero Rinne 1, Amelie Schmitt 9, Markku Similä 1, Steffen Tietsche 3, Rasmus Tonboe 10, Peter Wadhams 11, Mai Winstrup 12 and Hao Zuo 3add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(7), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071214
Submission received: 25 February 2020 / Revised: 3 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 10 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polar Sea Ice: Detection, Monitoring and Modeling)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very well written paper providing comprehensive description of new sea ice products in the SPICES project.There are just a few questions I am not clear in the combined SMOS/SMAP SIT retrieval. In line 282, which polarization is 2.7K bias in? When the linear fit is applied, does it adjust both SMOS and SMAP Tb's? Are both polarizations used in SIT retrieval? Any ground truth to validate the combined retrieval?  Other than that, I consider this paper ready to be published. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment which includes comments by all three reviewers and our responses to them.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Check the correct use of the preposition “on” in the text. For example, “New Products on Sea Ice Conditions” (Line 107). Better “New Products of Sea Ice Conditions” or “New Sea Ice Conditions Products”.

Line 4. Remove “Horizon 2020” from the name because it is a source of financing (the information is in the annotation) or write so “... SPICES Project by the EU Horizon 2020 program”.

Line 79. "... some of the sea ice models assimilating satellite data" - provide links to work on this topic

Line 85-86. "Today’s numerical weather and climate prediction models include a 85 comprehensive representation of large-scale physical processes of sea ice" - provide links to work on this topic. ‘Today’s’ change on “Present”.

Line 113. “... CryoSat-2 radar altimeter (RA)” - correctly “SAR Interferometer Radar Altimeter (SIRAL)”. There is a fundamental difference between the "classic" radar altimeter (Low resolution mode - LRM) and SAR (or delay-Doppler) Radar Altimeter.

Line 174. "... wavelength of waves ...". What is it?

Line 230. “... RA waveform ...” change on “... RA echo waveform ...”.

Line 244. “... to other delay-Doppler RAs, ...” change on “... to other SAR (or delay-Doppler) RAs, ...”.

Line 261. “... CryoSat-2 RA, ...” change on “... CryoSat-2 SIRAL, ...”.

Line 323. “... a result of a temperature increase, ...”. Water or air temperature? When talking about an temperature increase, it is necessary to indicate what value.

Author Response

Please see the attachment which includes comments by all three reviewers and our responses to them.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

I would like to thank you for your work and for preparing this paper. It is a important and current topic, with applicability for both the advancement of scientific method but, perhaps most importantly, for their adoption by operational services activity sectors.

Minor revisions:

Lines 85 – 86: please cite

Lines 91 – 93: please cite

Line 135: please define NM (nautical mile)

Some figures are at a low resolution; please solve this issue.

This paper uses a lot of acronyms. I kindly ask the authors to create a new subsection with a list of all acronyms. It is quite difficult for readers to remember which one is which [even if there are defined first time in text].

Author Response

Please see the attachment which includes comments by all three reviewers and our responses to them.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop