Next Article in Journal
Feasibility of Combining Deep Learning and RGB Images Obtained by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Leaf Area Index Estimation in Rice
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Penman-Monteith Model Based on Sentinel-2 Data for the Estimation of Actual Evapotranspiration in Vineyards
Previous Article in Journal
Interannual and Seasonal Variability of Glacier Surface Velocity in the Parlung Zangbo Basin, Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Special Issue
A First Assessment of the 2018 European Drought Impact on Ecosystem Evapotranspiration
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures

Remote Sens. 2021, 13(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010082
by Rajen Bajgain 1,2,*, Xiangming Xiao 2, Pradeep Wagle 3, John S. Kimball 4, Colin Brust 4, Jeffrey B. Basara 5,6, Prasanna Gowda 7, Patrick J. Starks 3 and James P. S. Neel 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010082
Submission received: 25 November 2020 / Revised: 20 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 29 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration (ET) II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very interesting study analyzing the differences in ET over different types of grasslands in Central US by remote sensing. The scope of the study an presentation of the results is adequate. I would like to see a Figure showing the spatial location of the sites, e.g. a high resolution satellite image or photos, and also a separation between the Results and Discussion prior to the publication.

Author Response

Dec 20, 2020

 

To,

Editor-in-Chief

Remote Sensing

 

We would like to thank editor/reviewer for their useful comments on the manuscript. We revised the manuscript closely following all their comments.

 

Here we have submitted the revised version of our manuscript and response to the reviewer’s comments is mentioned at the end of this cover letter.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact if you need any further information or clarifications.

 

Yours sincerely,

Rajen Bajgain

 

………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Rajen Bajgain, PhD

Research Agro-Ecologist

USDA-ARS, Sustainable Water Management Research Unit (SWMRU)

141 Experiment Station Rd, Stoneville, MS 38776

Phone: (662) 686-3753

Cell: 405-714-4360

Email:   [email protected]

Google Scholar:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C25&q=rajen+Bajgain&btnG=

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewer 1

 

This is a very interesting study analyzing the differences in ET over different types of grasslands in Central US by remote sensing. The scope of the study an presentation of the results is adequate.

Response: Thank you very much for your positive feedback on our manuscript.

 

I would like to see a Figure showing the spatial location of the sites, e.g. a high resolution satellite image or photos, and also a separation between the Results and Discussion prior to the publication.

Response: We have added a figure with the location of the two sites. Now, in this revised version we presented our Result and Discussion separately.

 

Reviewer 2

The work is very interesting, well written with clear defined the methodology and analysis undertaken. I would recommend it for publishing after some minor revision.

Response: Thank you for your positive comments and the opportunity to revise our manuscript.

I would suggest from the introduction missing the key research point and from the conclusions an shortly but inclusive discussion on the findings.

Response: Thank you for the suggestions. Although the comments are not explicit, we highlighted the key research point in the introduction section ( Please see L94-98) and also added a couple of sentences in the conclusion highlighting main findings and implication of this study ( L 482-483 and L491-496)

“Results from this study showed that when native pastures undergo different management activities for enhancing higher grass production, the water use and loss from are dependent on climate variability and the heterogeneities within management units. Therefore, a better estimation of the water uses and loss from differently managed pasture at finer scale would require for establishing resilient and higher productive pasture”

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is very interesting, well written with clear defined the methodology and analysis undertaken. I would recommend it for publishing after some minor revision. I would suggest from the introduction missing the key research point and from the conclusions an shortly but inclusive discussion on the findings.

Author Response

Dec 20, 2020

 

To,

Editor-in-Chief

Remote Sensing

 

We would like to thank editor/reviewer for their useful comments on the manuscript. We revised the manuscript closely following all their comments.

 

Here we have submitted the revised version of our manuscript and response to the reviewer’s comments is mentioned at the end of this cover letter.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact if you need any further information or clarifications.

 

Yours sincerely,

Rajen Bajgain

 

………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Rajen Bajgain, PhD

Research Agro-Ecologist

USDA-ARS, Sustainable Water Management Research Unit (SWMRU)

141 Experiment Station Rd, Stoneville, MS 38776

Phone: (662) 686-3753

Cell: 405-714-4360

Email:   [email protected]

Google Scholar:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C25&q=rajen+Bajgain&btnG=

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewer 1

 

This is a very interesting study analyzing the differences in ET over different types of grasslands in Central US by remote sensing. The scope of the study an presentation of the results is adequate.

Response: Thank you very much for your positive feedback on our manuscript.

 

I would like to see a Figure showing the spatial location of the sites, e.g. a high resolution satellite image or photos, and also a separation between the Results and Discussion prior to the publication.

Response: We have added a figure with the location of the two sites. Now, in this revised version we presented our Result and Discussion separately.

 

Reviewer 2

The work is very interesting, well written with clear defined the methodology and analysis undertaken. I would recommend it for publishing after some minor revision.

Response: Thank you for your positive comments and the opportunity to revise our manuscript.

I would suggest from the introduction missing the key research point and from the conclusions an shortly but inclusive discussion on the findings.

Response: Thank you for the suggestions. Although the comments are not explicit, we highlighted the key research point in the introduction section ( Please see L94-98) and also added a couple of sentences in the conclusion highlighting main findings and implication of this study ( L 482-483 and L491-496)

“Results from this study showed that when native pastures undergo different management activities for enhancing higher grass production, the water use and loss from are dependent on climate variability and the heterogeneities within management units. Therefore, a better estimation of the water uses and loss from differently managed pasture at finer scale would require for establishing resilient and higher productive pasture”

 

 

 

 

 

Back to TopTop