Next Article in Journal
Target Localization Based on Bistatic T/R Pair Selection in GNSS-Based Multistatic Radar System
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Fully Convolutional Embedding Networks for Hyperspectral Images Dimensionality Reduction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Single-Satellite Integrated Navigation Algorithm Based on Broadband LEO Constellation Communication Links

Remote Sens. 2021, 13(4), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040703
by Lvyang Ye 1, Yikang Yang 1,*, Xiaolun Jing 1, Jiangang Ma 1, Lingyu Deng 1 and Hengnian Li 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(4), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040703
Submission received: 30 December 2020 / Revised: 3 February 2021 / Accepted: 11 February 2021 / Published: 15 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper ‘Single-satellite integrated navigation algorithm based on broadband LEO constellation communication link' provides an advance in the current knowledge. Generally, it is written in correct English. There are some minor errors, however. The aim of the study would be interesting to the journal’s readership. The mathematical model is well-presented. There is an issue with the interpretation of one equation. The study is well motivated and related to the previous studies. The calculation process gives valid results. I suggest a correction of the Abstract and Results sections. The first point is that the abstract is longer than the results section. Also, the discussion with other studies is difficult to find, it should be the main point of the conclusions/results section. I suggest acceptance for publication after minor revision.

 

Remarks:

  • Shorten the abstract, make it more concise and precise.
  • The discussion should be highlighted.
  • The results section is surprisingly short and poor, compared to the used methodology, please correct it to present the summary of the research and the results obtained
  • Please remove repetitions in the text, eg. in the abstract: challenging environments (10-11), traditional algorithms (11-14)
  • Please explain the operators used in the formula 28 
  • sub- and superscripts in Eq. 28 are confusing as they resemble dot product notation
  • what reference system was used in the study? WGS84? Please explain it in the text

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Good work. No more comments from me. Thanks.

Back to TopTop