Next Article in Journal
Automated High-Resolution Bathymetry from Sentinel-1 SAR Images in Deeper Nearshore Coastal Waters in Eastern Florida
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Main Lobe Cancellation Method for Suppression Directional Noise in HFSWR Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A Feasibility Study of Thermal Infrared Imaging for Monitoring Natural Terrain—A Case Study in Hong Kong
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chaotic Properties of Gravity Waves during Typhoons Observed by HFSWR
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Antenna Pattern Calibration Method for Phased Array of High-Frequency Surface Wave Radar Based on First-Order Sea Clutter

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(24), 5789; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245789
by Hongbo Li 1, Aijun Liu 2,*, Qiang Yang 1, Changjun Yu 2 and Zhe Lyv 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(24), 5789; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245789
Submission received: 18 November 2023 / Revised: 11 December 2023 / Accepted: 16 December 2023 / Published: 18 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Applications of HF Radar)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript by Li et al. entitled “Antenna pattern calibration method for phased array of high-frequency surface wave radar based on first-order sea clutter,” as the title implies, investigates the effect of antenna pattern distortions on backscatter data obtained from shore based high frequency (HF) radar systems. This topic has been addressed by other authors but this work is novel in that: 1) it looks explicitly at the effect of antenna pattern distortions on phased array systems, which has been ignored to date, 2) it provides a theoretical derivation of the distortion effects, and 3) it presents a self-contained method to estimate antenna pattern distortions from the collected backscatter data.

 

The use of shore-based HF radar systems for marine science, military, and coastal resource management applications has grown in recent years. Furthermore, the users of these systems are most often environmental scientists without the in-depth background in signal processing required to fully understand or to minimize errors associated with the measurements. This author team represents an exception to that rule. They have been conducting detailed analyses of backscatter data and detailed theoretical derivations based on the complicated signal processing algorithms typically employed by the HF radar systems. Others have done so as well and the authors here do a good job reviewing and referencing past work.

 

The manuscript is clearly written and illustrated with only a few minor exception as noted below. The validation results presented using numerical simulations and collected backscatter data are convincing and should be of interest to users of HF radar systems. For these reasons, I recommend the manuscript for publication with only minor corrections.

 

MINOR COMMENTS:

 

Line 8: “method which” should be “method, which”

 

Line 46: “mature since their” should be “mature due to their”

 

Line 46: “models which” should be “models, which”

 

Line 79: “through the iterative way” should be “through iteration”

 

Line 131: “Since its” should be “Due to its”

 

Line 294: “means that employ” should be “this means that we can employ”

 

Line 362: “steps the” should be “steps in the”

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Antenna pattern distortion will decrease the direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation performance of the direction finding algorithm using the phase manifold of HF radar. The authors propose a method for array calibration from first-order sea clutter spectrum and single-DOA spectrum points. The antenna pattern calibration has been focused for Direction-finding HF radars over long years, while the phase distortion has been found recently for phased-array HF radar, which is focused in this work. The paper is well written and is a good report for the HF radar community. Some minor comments for the paper. 

1. line 269, this is not range-Doppler spectrum. It is Doppler spectrum.

2. line 271-272, “affected by … spectrum broadening”. I’m confused. To my knowledge, spectrum broadening is complicated.

3. In fig 8 and 12, it is strange for the phase_ideal line, please give more details on it.

4. part 3 can be found in other literature, I suggest that this part can be cited.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I congratulate the authors to provide a detailed rebuttal to the major comments. Then, the paper is OK to be published.

Back to TopTop