Next Article in Journal
Non-Ellipsoidal Infrared Group/Extended Target Tracking Based on Poisson Multi-Bernoulli Mixture Filter and B-Spline
Next Article in Special Issue
Voronoi Centerline-Based Seamline Network Generation Method
Previous Article in Journal
A Compact High-Order Finite-Difference Method with Optimized Coefficients for 2D Acoustic Wave Equation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Self-Supervised Depth Completion Based on Multi-Modal Spatio-Temporal Consistency
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Two-View Structure-from-Motion with Multiple Feature Detector Operators

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030605
by Elisabeth Johanna Dippold 1 and Fuan Tsai 1,2,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030605
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the submission, see my reviews in the pdf attached.

The paper needs a huge check in the presentation of the results

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper needs to be more explicit about the primary contributions and needs to focus on their own work. A big chunk of the paper is introductions/descriptions of others’ work. The most important part, the details of how the multiple FDO is implemented, are missing. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper presents an approach of SfM with fusion of different feature descripton. Though that is not a novelty at all, the authors extend its application to wider PCL generation and tested over real datasets, fact that confers the work more robustness and validity to be appreciated as a contribution (at least from a practical point of view) to the scientific community.

Other comments:

- Section about Epipolar Geometry definitions and theory, as well as, feature detectors essentials are mainstream and very outdated (the explanation itself). Please sum up and simply cite.

- Please revise in depth the use of acronyms with capital letters, and introduced from the very fist time.

- Also, double check the use of numbers in the text, when it looks formal by texting the number (ie "divided in to 2" looks very unformal, line 355, page 9).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I think the authors have reviewed the paper accordingly with the suggestins

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop