The Responses of Ozone to the Solar Eclipse on the 21st of June 2020 in the Mesosphere and Upper Stratosphere
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Solar Eclipse Event and Data
2.1. Description of This Solar Eclipse
2.2. Data from MLS
3. Results
3.1. The Variation of the Vertical Distribution of Ozone
3.2. The Spatial Distribution of Ozone Variations
3.3. Formatting of Mathematical Components
3.4. The Vertical Distributions of CO Concentration and Variation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Ozone concentration obviously increased during the solar eclipse on 21 June 2020 at the heights of 45–65 km compared to the variation in quiet time, and it reduced slightly by −3–−5% from 30 km to 35 km. Also, the variation becomes stronger with height increases. This variation recovered after 22nd June.
- Ozone concentration decreased around 40 km in the region of 24°N–36°N during the solar eclipse, and it increased in low latitudes at this height. Then, it increased in most of the regions at the heights of 45–60 km. Between 60 and 65 km, the variation of ozone concentration was obvious both for increase and decrease. The nighttime ozone variation was smaller than that in the daytime, especially in the height of 60–65 km. Aside from that, the decrease in the height of 1 hPa in the daytime changed into an increase in the nighttime in the low latitudes.
- At the height of 40 km, ozone concentration slightly increased by 2–6% in low latitudes and decreased by −2–−4% at 32°N–40°N. As a result, ozone concentration decreased near the track of the solar eclipse with a slight increase near the equator under the impact of the solar eclipse. At the height of 46 km, ozone concentration increased in most of the regions. At the height of 62 km, the increase and decrease were both obvious, with a maximum value of over 30% for both increase and decrease. Also, enhancement plays a leading role in the ozone variation at this height.
- HO2 increased to over 150% in 40 km, where ozone decreased slightly. HO2 also decreased by 70–90% at the height of 1 hPa, which corresponded with the increase in ozone concentration at this height. In most of the regions of 60 km–65 km, it increased by 10–90%, where ozone mainly decreased in the middle and high latitudes. The variation of HO2 was mostly reversed to the variation of ozone concentration during the solar eclipse. Therefore, the variation of ozone during the solar eclipse is mostly due to the photochemical reactions related to HO2.
- In the heights of 32–39 km, CO concentration increased with the maximum value of 90% in the regions of 20°N–36°N. This indicated the upwelling motion and was related to the decrease in ozone near 40 km. Also, the CO decrease of −10–−50% in 52–60 km indicated the upwelling motion and was related to the ozone increase in this region. From 60 km–65 km, the downward motion in 32°N–40°N caused a decline in ozone, which was associated with the increase in CO concentration by over 100%. Accordingly, ozone variations are also related to dynamic transportation.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kerr, J.B.; McElroy, C.T. Evidence for Large Upward Trends of Ultraviolet-B Radiation Linked to Ozone Depletion. Science 1993, 262, 1032–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lubin, D.; Jensen, E. Effects of clouds and stratospheric ozone depletion on ultraviolet radiation trends. Nature 1995, 377, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waugh, D.W.; Oman, L.; Newman, P.A.; Stolarski, R.S.; Pawson, S.; Nielsen, J.E.; Perlwitz, J. Effect of zonal asymmetries in stratospheric ozone on simulated Southern Hemisphere climate trends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36, 2009GL040419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Tian, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, M.; Lian, T.; Hu, D.; Qie, K. Surface ocean current variations in the North Pacific related to Arctic stratospheric ozone. Clim. Dyn. 2022, 59, 3087–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Tian, W.; Lin, Y.; Gou, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Xie, F. Decadal changes in the relationship between Arctic stratospheric ozone and sea surface temperatures in the North Pacific. Atmos. Res. 2023, 292, 106870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedoseev, L.I.; Krasilnikov, A.A.; Kulikov, Y.Y.; Ryskin, V.G. Microwave observations of stratospheric ozone variations during a solar eclipse. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Kharkov Symposium on Physics and Engineering of Microwaves, Millimeter, and Submillimeter Waves (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX828), Kharkov, Ukraine, 21–26 June 2004; Volume 2, pp. 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manchanda, R.K.; Sinha, P.R.; Sreenivasan, S.; Trivedi, D.B.; Kapardhi, B.V.N.; Kumar, B.S.; Kumar, P.R.; Satyaprakash, U.; Rao, V.N. In-situ measurements of vertical structure of ozone during the solar eclipse of 15 January 2010. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2012, 84, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, C.; Cui, J.; Shen, F.; Lu, J.; Xiong, S.; Wei, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; et al. Effects of the annular eclipse on the surface O3 in Yunnan province, China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 968507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, G.; Kumar, P.V.; Ratnam, M.V.; Mohammad, S.; Kumar, M.A.; Rao, P.V.; Rahaman, K.; Basha, H.A. Response of tropical lower atmosphere to the annular solar eclipse of 15 January, 2010. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2011, 73, 1907–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerasopoulos, E.; Zerefos, C.S.; Tsagouri, I.; Founda, D.; Amiridis, V.; Bais, A.F.; Belehaki, A.; Christou, N.; Economou, G.; Kanakidou, M.; et al. The total solar eclipse of March 2006: Overview. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 5205–5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K.K.; Subrahmanyam, K.V.; John, S.R. New insights into the stratospheric and mesosphere-lower thermospheric ozone response to the abrupt changes in solar forcing. In Annales Geophysicae; Copernicus Publications: Göttingen, Germany, 2011; Volume 29, pp. 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratnam, M.V.; Basha, G.; Roja Raman, M.; Mehta, S.K.; Krishna Murthy, B.V.; Jayaraman, A. Unusual enhancement in temperature and ozone vertical distribution in the lower stratosphere observed over Gadanki, India, following the 15 January 2010 annular eclipse. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38, L02803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulikov, Y.Y.; Krasilnikov, A.A.; Shchitov, A.M. New Mobile Ground-Based Microwave Instrument to Research of Stratospheric Ozone (Some Results of Observations). In Proceedings of the 2007 International Kharkov Symposium Physics and Engrg. of Millimeter and Sub-Millimeter Waves (MSMW), Kharkov, Ukraine, 25–30 June 2007; Volume 1, pp. 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imai, K.; Imamura, T.; Takahashi, K.; Akiyoshi, H.; Yamashita, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Ebisawa, K.; Shiotani, M. SMILES observations of mesospheric ozone during the solar eclipse. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 3576–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prather, M.J. Ozone in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 1981, 86, 5325–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Jacob, D.J.; Turquety, S. Atmospheric acetylene and its relationship with CO as an indicator of air mass age. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, D12305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, F.T.; Mayr, H.G.; Russell, J.M., III; Mlynczak, M.G. Ozone diurnal variations in the stratosphere and lower mesosphere, based on measurements from SABER on TIMED. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2010, 115, 2010JD014484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakazaki, T.; Fujiwara, M.; Mitsuda, C.; Imai, K.; Manago, N.; Naito, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Akiyoshi, H.; Kinnison, D.; Sano, T.; et al. Diurnal ozone variations in the stratosphere revealed in observations from the Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission Sounder (SMILES) on board the International Space Station (ISS). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 2991–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallister, R.C.; Tuck, A.F. The diurnal variation of ozone in the upper stratosphere as a test of photochemical theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1983, 109, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, J.; Jiang, S.; Yao, J.; Cui, J.; Lu, J.; Tian, Y.; Yang, C.; Xiong, S.; Wei, G.; Zhang, X.; et al. The Responses of Ozone to the Solar Eclipse on the 21st of June 2020 in the Mesosphere and Upper Stratosphere. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010014
Li J, Jiang S, Yao J, Cui J, Lu J, Tian Y, Yang C, Xiong S, Wei G, Zhang X, et al. The Responses of Ozone to the Solar Eclipse on the 21st of June 2020 in the Mesosphere and Upper Stratosphere. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010014
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Jingyuan, Shuwen Jiang, Jingrui Yao, Jingqi Cui, Jianyong Lu, Yufeng Tian, Chaolei Yang, Shiping Xiong, Guanchun Wei, Xiaoping Zhang, and et al. 2024. "The Responses of Ozone to the Solar Eclipse on the 21st of June 2020 in the Mesosphere and Upper Stratosphere" Remote Sensing 16, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010014
APA StyleLi, J., Jiang, S., Yao, J., Cui, J., Lu, J., Tian, Y., Yang, C., Xiong, S., Wei, G., Zhang, X., Fu, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Li, Z., & Zhang, H. (2024). The Responses of Ozone to the Solar Eclipse on the 21st of June 2020 in the Mesosphere and Upper Stratosphere. Remote Sensing, 16(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010014