Next Article in Journal
An Improved Method of Mitigating Orbital Errors in Multiple Synthetic-Aperture-Radar Interferometric Pair Analysis for Interseismic Deformation Measurement: Application to the Tuosuo Lake Segment of the Kunlun Fault
Previous Article in Journal
A Priori Estimation of Radar Satellite Interferometry’s Sensitivity for Landslide Monitoring in the Italian Emilia-Romagna Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
BAFormer: A Novel Boundary-Aware Compensation UNet-like Transformer for High-Resolution Cropland Extraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Direction of Arrival Joint Prediction of Underwater Acoustic Communication Signals Using Faster R-CNN and Frequency–Azimuth Spectrum

by
Le Cheng
1,
Yue Liu
2,
Bingbing Zhang
2,
Zhengliang Hu
2,*,
Hongna Zhu
1 and
Bin Luo
1
1
School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2
College of Meteorology and Oceanology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2563; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142563
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024

Abstract

Utilizing hydrophone arrays for detecting underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) signals leverages spatial information to enhance detection efficiency and expand the perceptual range. This study redefines the task of UWAC signal detection as an object detection problem within the frequency–azimuth (FRAZ) spectrum. Employing Faster R-CNN as a signal detector, the proposed method facilitates the joint prediction of UWAC signals, including estimates of the number of sources, modulation type, frequency band, and direction of arrival (DOA). The proposed method extracts precise frequency and DOA features of the signals without requiring prior knowledge of the number of signals or frequency bands. Instead, it extracts these features jointly during training and applies them to perform joint predictions during testing. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing techniques across all signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), particularly excelling in low SNRs. It achieves a detection F1 score of 0.96 at an SNR of −15 dB. We further verified its performance under varying modulation types, numbers of sources, grating lobe interference, strong signal interference, and array structure parameters. Furthermore, the practicality and robustness of our approach were evaluated in lake-based UWAC experiments, and the model trained solely on simulated signals performed competitively in the trials.
Keywords: DOA estimation; faster R-CNN; frequency–azimuth spectrum; modulation recognition; underwater acoustic communication signal DOA estimation; faster R-CNN; frequency–azimuth spectrum; modulation recognition; underwater acoustic communication signal

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, H.; Luo, B. Direction of Arrival Joint Prediction of Underwater Acoustic Communication Signals Using Faster R-CNN and Frequency–Azimuth Spectrum. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142563

AMA Style

Cheng L, Liu Y, Zhang B, Hu Z, Zhu H, Luo B. Direction of Arrival Joint Prediction of Underwater Acoustic Communication Signals Using Faster R-CNN and Frequency–Azimuth Spectrum. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(14):2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Le, Yue Liu, Bingbing Zhang, Zhengliang Hu, Hongna Zhu, and Bin Luo. 2024. "Direction of Arrival Joint Prediction of Underwater Acoustic Communication Signals Using Faster R-CNN and Frequency–Azimuth Spectrum" Remote Sensing 16, no. 14: 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop