Next Article in Journal
Dietary Intakes and Cardiovascular Health of Healthy Adults in Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Whole-Food Plant-Based Lifestyle Program
Previous Article in Journal
Is Eating Raisins Healthy?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Urinary Cadmium-to-Zinc Intake Ratio and Adult Mortality in a Follow-Up Study of NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004

1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
2
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
3
Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, Section of Nutrition and Metabolism, International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC-WHO), 69372 Lyon, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010056
Submission received: 19 November 2019 / Revised: 18 December 2019 / Accepted: 19 December 2019 / Published: 24 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Micronutrients and Human Health)

Abstract

:
Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic heavy metal associated with increased mortality, but the effect of zinc (Zn) intake on the association between Cd and mortality is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the association of urinary Cd to Zn intake ratio (Cd/Zn ratio) and mortality risk. In total, 15642 US adults in NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 were followed until 2011 (15-year mean follow-up). Of the 5367 total deaths, 1194 were attributed to cancer and 1677 were attributed to CVD. After adjustment for potential confounders, positive associations were observed between urinary Cd and all-cause mortality (HR for highest vs. lowest quartile: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.14–1.68) and cancer mortality (HR: 1.54; CI: 1.05–2.27). Urinary Cd was positively associated with cancer mortality among the lowest Zn consumers, and the association diminished among the highest Zn consumers. Positive relationships were observed between the Cd/Zn ratio and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.54; CI: 1.23–1.93), cancer mortality (HR: 1.65; CI: 1.11–2.47) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.49; CI: 1.18–1.88). In conclusion, these findings indicate that Zn intake may modify the association between Cd and mortality. Furthermore, the Cd/Zn ratio, which was positively associated with mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD, may be an important predictor of mortality.

1. Introduction

During certain industrial processes, cadmium (Cd), a highly toxic and carcinogenic metal, is produced as a byproduct. Cd can then leach into soil and water which are used in agricultural processes, causing Cd to appear in the food supply [1]. The food supply is the primary source of Cd exposure in non-smokers, and tobacco is an additional prime source of Cd in smokers [2]. Due to its long half-life, Cd may be accumulated in multiple tissue types in the human body, thereby leading to many diseases such as kidney dysfunction [3], reproductive dysfunction [4], cardiovascular disease [5], diabetes [6], osteoporosis [7], cancer [8], and increased mortality [9].
Higher Cd exposure has been linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a Swedish cohort study [10] and linked to heart failure and mortality in elderly Australian women [11]. Cd exposure has also been associated with mortality from total, lung and pancreatic cancers in the Strong Heart Study, which included 4545 American Indian participants [12]. Several studies have reported that higher Cd exposure was associated with increased mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD in the general populations of Japan [13], Belgium [14], and the US [15].
Interestingly, the mechanism underlying Cd’s effect on these diseases relates to its interaction with zinc (Zn). Cd competes with Zn in cellular uptake and metallothionein and due to its higher affinity for metallothionein, Cd displaces Zn, resulting in increased synthesis of metallothionein and Cd absorption [16]. Increased saturation of Cd at binding sites within the kidney can lead to microscopic tubular proteinuria (known to occur at urinary Cd concentrations of 2 µg/g creatinine) and renal dysfunction (at urinary Cd concentrations of 10 µg/g creatinine) [1,17]. Due to the competition between Cd and Zn for several key binding sites, dietary Zn may interfere in the absorption, accumulation, and bioavailability of Cd in the body. This has been demonstrated in several animal studies where Zn supplementation protected against Cd toxicity in the spleen, liver, and kidney [18,19,20]. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that Zn intake is linked to lower Cd burden in US adults, presumably due its competitive uptake and metallothionein binding with Cd [21]. Among US men with low Zn consumption and high concentrations of Cd excreted in urine, total prostate-specific antigen, a biomarker indicative of prostate cancer, was elevated, suggesting a relationship between dietary Zn, urinary Cd and cancer [22]. Cancer mortality risk appears to be higher among those with inadequate Zn intake [23].
These studies suggest that dietary Zn may protect against Cd toxicity in humans, indicating that dietary Zn should be considered in investigating the association between Cd exposure and health outcomes, including mortality. There are few studies exploring the relationship between the Cd/Zn ratio and mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the association of the Cd/Zn ratio with mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD among US adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Data from 15,641 participants in NHANES 1988–1994 [24] and 1999–2004 [25,26,27] were used. Exclusion criteria consisted of pregnant or breastfeeding women (n = 458), those with unreliable or incomplete dietary recalls (n = 1128) and those with missing data on urinary creatinine and urinary Cd (n = 7957). Additionally, because cancer and CVD incidence and mortality rates are very low for young people [28,29], we excluded subjects under 30 years old. NHANES study protocols were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics research ethics review board. (Institutional Review Board approval and documented consent from participants for NHANES 1988–1994 and Protocol #98-12 for NHANES 1999–2004).

2.2. Estimation of Dietary Zn Intake

Dietary Zn intake was estimated from one 24-h dietary recall in NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004.

2.3. Biomarker Data

Participants’ spot urine samples were collected in the mobile examination center. Urinary Cd was measured as described in the NHANES Laboratory Procedures Manual [30,31]. While elevated blood Cd confirms recent acute exposure, it does not correlate well with total body burden. Therefore, urinary Cd, which reflects integrated exposure and total body burden [32], was used in this analysis. Urinary Cd concentrations were determined using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and adjusted by creatinine.

2.4. Mortality Data Linked to the NHANES

We combined NHANES data from the survey years 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 with their linked mortality datasets. During a mean of follow-up of 15 years (through 31 December 2011), 5367 deaths occurred [33]. NHANES-linked mortality data were ascertained through probabilistic record matching with the National Death Index (NDI). Follow-up time per person was calculated beginning at the time of the NHANES interview date and ending at death or censoring. The causes of death were determined from the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [34]. The number of deaths, crude mortality rate and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMRs) of all-cause, cancer and CVD according to quartile of urinary Cd were estimated. ASMRs were based on US Census 2000 population data.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). To account for the complex survey design, the appropriate SAS procedures, weight, strata, and cluster variables were used. Participants were grouped into quartiles based on urinary Cd concentration after adjustment for urinary creatinine and into tertiles based on dietary Zn intake for 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. The frequencies and means of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors according to quartiles of urinary Cd concentration were estimated. Significance testing for the differences in urinary Cd between subgroups was conducted by ANOVA or chi-square test.
Poverty income ratio (PIR) was calculated as a ratio of household income to the poverty threshold after accounting for inflation and family size, based on poverty guidelines provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Participants were subsequently dichotomized as PIR ≤1.3 or >1.3. Positive smoking status was defined as having at least 100 lifetime cigarettes. Current smokers were defined as those who did not quit smoking and were stratified as heavy (≥15 cigarettes daily) and light (<15 cigarettes daily). Former smokers were identified as those who had reported quitting smoking by the time of interview. Diabetes mellitus was defined as having a fasting plasma glucose level >126 mg/dl or taking insulin or diabetic medications to lower blood sugar. Hypertension was defined as having a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, diastolic pressure >90 mmHg, or taking any prescribed medication for the treatment of high blood pressure. Aspirin users were defined as those using aspirin regularly during the past month. Supplement users were defined as those using nutritional supplements during the past month by the time of the baseline interview.
The interaction between Zn intake and urinary Cd was tested for significance in Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (HRs), multivariable HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality were estimated by quartile of urinary Cd, quartile of urinary Cd stratified by level of dietary Zn, and quartile of Cd/Zn ratio. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for age and gender. Model 2 additionally included ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, Zn intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD and cancer. Alcohol consumption was included as a covariate based on previous studies [35,36]. Covariates were selected for all cause-specific mortalities based on the existing literature. Model 3 of cancer mortality included all variables in Model 2 except hypertension, saturated fatty acid intake and history of CVD [37,38]. Multivariable model 4 of CVD mortality included all variables of Model 2 except Zn intake and history of cancer [39,40,41]. All p-values reported are two-sided (α = 0.05).

3. Results

When separated into quartiles of Cd exposure using urinary Cd, US adults in the highest quartile were more likely to be women, older, current heavy smokers, and aspirin users compared to those with lower Cd exposures. Those in the highest quartile of Cd exposure also had lower incomes, lower BMIs, and had lower rates of hypertension and histories of cancer, coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke. Adults in the lowest quartile of urinary Cd were more likely to be men, of younger age, non-smokers, have higher levels of income, and higher intakes of Zn and saturated fat (Table 1).
Of the 5367 total deaths that occurred over a mean follow-up of 15 years, 1194 were attributed to cancer and 1677 were attributed to CVD. Table 2 shows the number of deaths and ASMRs of all-cause, cancer and CVD by quartile of urinary Cd concentration among US adults aged 30 years and older in NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. A greater urinary Cd concentration was positively associated with ASMRs of all-cause, cancer and CVD.
Table 3 shows Cox proportional HRs and 95% CIs for all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality by quartiles of urinary Cd concentration. In Model 1, after adjusting for age and gender, a positive linear association between urinary Cd and all-cause mortality was observed (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 2.04; 95% CI = 1.75 to 2.37; p-trend < 0.0001). After further adjustment for potential confounders (Model 2), the association remained significant (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 1.38; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.68; p-trend < 0.0001). In multivariable model 1, adjusting for age and gender, we also observed a positive association between urinary Cd and cancer mortality (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 2.90; 95% CI = 2.14 to 3.93; p-trend < 0.0001) and CVD mortality (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 1.68; 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.13; p-trend < 0.0001). In multivariable model 3 adjusting for cancer-related potential confounders, we observed a positive linear association between urinary Cd and cancer mortality (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 1.54; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.27; p-trend < 0.005). However, after further adjustment for CVD-related potential confounders (Model 4), the association between urinary Cd and CVD mortality was attenuated and no longer significant (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 1.22; 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.57; p-trend 0.0502). CVD: Cardiovascular disease.
There was a marginally significant interaction between Zn intake and urinary Cd (p-value = 0.08), so we analyzed associations within Zn intake subgroups. Among the lowest tertile of Zn consumers, there was a clear positive association between urinary Cd and cancer mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.07–3.01); however, the association was weaker among the highest Zn consumers (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.66; 95% CI: 0.80–3.41) (Table 4). There was no association between urinary Cd and CVD mortality among the lowest tertile and highest tertile of Zn consumers.
Table 5 shows HRs and 95% CIs for all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality by quartile of the Cd/Zn ratio. After adjusting for age and gender, there were positive associations between the Cd/Zn ratio and all-cause mortality (HR for highest vs. lowest quartile (Q4 vs. Q1): 2.17; 95% CI: 1.86–2.52; p-trend < 0.0001), cancer mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 2.86; 95% CI: 2.09–3.92; p-trend < 0.0001), and CVD mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.60–2.55; p-trend < 0.0001). After additional adjustment for related potential confounders, the significance of these positive associations between the Cd/Zn ratio and all-cause mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23–1.93; p-trend < 0.0005), cancer mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11–2.47, p-trend < 0.05) and CVD mortality (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.18–1.88, p-trend < 0.001) remained significant.

4. Discussion

Using nationally representative data, US adults with the highest urinary Cd tended to be older, female, current heavy smokers, normal weight status and lower levels of income, which is consistent with previous findings based on NHANES 1999–2012 data [42]. Moreover, our findings are in agreement with studies showing that urinary Cd was negatively associated with BMI in NHANES 1999–2002 [15,43]. The current study also found that higher urinary Cd was associated with CVD risk factors such as hypertension, aspirin use, and history of CHD or stroke, consistently with a previous report linking urinary Cd to CVD [44]. We also found that greater urinary Cd was associated with cancer history, which is consistent with previous studies showing that higher urinary Cd level was associated with total cancer, lung cancer [45] and breast cancer risk in Japanese women [46].
This study found that greater urinary Cd is associated with greater all-cause mortality and cancer mortality after adjusting for important potential confounders. These results are consistent with previous studies reporting that urinary Cd levels were associated with a greater risk of all-cause cancer mortality [12,15,47]. Garcia-Esquinas [12] et al. showed that Cd exposure was positively associated with total cancer mortality and with mortality from cancers of the lung and pancreas. While Menke [15] and Larsson [47] reported that urinary Cd was positively associated with CVD mortality, the current study shows that the association between urinary Cd and CVD mortality was diminished after adjusting for all relevant covariates and was marginally significant (HR for the highest versus the lowest quartile 1.22; 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.57; p-trend 0.0502).
Several studies reported that Zn can reduce the risk of Cd toxicity by competitive interactions between Zn and Cd [9,16]. Our group previously reported that Zn intake is associated with lower Cd burden [21] and with lower urinary Cd among non-smokers [48]. In our fully adjusted analysis, there was a marginally significant interaction between urinary Cd and Zn intake (p-value = 0.08). This finding suggests that the relationship between Zn intake and urinary Cd may differ by Zn intake level, and that both Zn intake and Cd exposure may need to be considered together to precisely predict mortality risk. We therefore investigated the associations of urinary Cd with mortality by Zn intake level. We found that greater urinary Cd was associated with greater cancer mortality only among the lowest tertile of Zn consumers. Because higher Zn intakes appeared to reduce the strength of the association between Cd and mortality, we investigated the combined relationship of Cd exposure and Zn intake with mortality using the Cd/Zn ratio. As the association of urinary Cd with mortality might be modified by dietary Zn level, the Cd/Zn ratio may be a helpful metric for investigating the combined relationship of Cd exposure, Zn intake and mortality. We found a clear positive association between the Cd/Zn ratio cancer mortality, consistent with a previous study by Lin et al. showing a positive association between Cd exposure and cancer mortality among older adults in NHANES III with low Zn intake levels [23]. Lin et al. [23] also showed that the Zn-to-Cd ratio was more strongly associated with cancer mortality risk than either Zn intake or urinary Cd alone. In addition to confirming the association between the Cd/Zn ratio and cancer mortality, the current study also demonstrated that the Cd/Zn ratio is an important predictor of all-cause and CVD mortality. Furthermore, we characterized these associations, showing that linear trends existed between the Cd/Zn ratio and all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality in adjusted models.
This study is strengthened by its use of a large, nationally representative sample of the US adult population. This large and diverse sample allows for the examination of the relationships between urinary Cd, mortality, and Zn intake across participants with varying lifestyle and sociodemographic characteristics. Additionally, this study included a large number of deaths and a long-term follow-up of 15 years. However, this study has several limitations. Firstly, estimation of Zn intake was based on one day of dietary recall data, which may not accurately reflect usual intake of individual participants. Secondly, competing risks can be present between CVD and cancer mortality. Thirdly, even though we tried to match variables between datasets of 1988–1994 and those of 1999–2004, there might be systematic error in combining two datasets. Finally, residual confounding factors might be present in this analysis, although we attempted to adjust for all relevant covariates available in the NHANES dataset.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a greater Cd/Zn ratio was associated with greater mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD in fully adjusted models, indicating that the Cd/Zn ratio, rather than urinary Cd or Zn intake alone, may be an important predictor of mortality from all causes, cancer, and CVD. Future research should be conducted to establish recommendation for optimal Zn intake for protecting against Cd toxicity and to explain the relationship between Cd-related disease risk and mortality using biomarkers in a prospective cohort study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and O.K.C.; Methodology, K.K. and M.M.M.; Analysis, K.K.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, K.K.; Writing-Review & Editing, K.K., M.M.M., J.R.S., K.H., D.M., H.N. and O.K.C.; Supervision, O.K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2012) Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp5.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  2. Pappas, R.S.; Polzin, G.M.; Zhang, L.; Watson, C.H.; Paschal, D.C.; Ashley, D.L. Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mortensen, M.E.; Wong, L.Y.; Osterloh, J.D. Smoking status and urine cadmium above levels associated with subclinical renal effects in U.S. adults without chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2011, 214, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Godt, J.; Scheidig, F.; Grosse-Siestrup, C.; Esche, V.; Brandenburg, P.; Reich, A.; Groneberg, D.A. The toxicity of cadmium and resulting hazards for human health. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2006, 1, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Peters, J.L.; Perlstein, T.S.; Perry, M.J.; McNeely, E.; Weuve, J. Cadmium exposure in association with history of stroke and heart failure. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bernhoft, R.A. Cadmium toxicity and treatment. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 394652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gallagher, C.M.; Kovach, J.S.; Meliker, J.R. Urinary cadmium and osteoporosis in U.S. Women ≥50 years of age: NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hartwig, A. Cadmium and cancer. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2013, 11, 491–507. [Google Scholar]
  9. McCarty, M.F. Zinc and multi-mineral supplementation should mitigate the pathogenic impact of cadmium exposure. Med. Hypotheses 2012, 79, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, H.; Fagerberg, B.; Sallsten, G.; Borné, Y.; Hedblad, B.; Engström, G.; Barregard, L.; Andersson, E.M. Smoking-induced risk of future cardiovascular disease is partly mediated by cadmium in tobacco: Malmo Diet and Cancer Cohort Study. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Deering, K.E.; Callan, A.C.; Prince, R.L.; Lim, W.H.; Thompson, P.L.; Lewis, J.R.; Hinwood, A.L.; Devine, A. Low-level cadmium exposure and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly Australian women: A cohort study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Garcia-Esquinas, E.; Pollan, M.; Tellez-Plaza, M.; Francesconi, K.A.; Goessler, W.; Guallar, E.; Umans, J.G.; Yeh, J.; Best, L.G.; Navas-Acien, A. Cadmium exposure and cancer mortality in a prospective cohort: The strong heart study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Suwazono, Y.; Nogawa, K.; Morikawa, Y.; Nishijo, M.; Kobayashi, E.; Kido, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Nogawa, K. All-cause mortality increased by environmental cadmium exposure in the Japanese general population in cadmium non-polluted areas. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nawrot, T.S.; Van Hecke, E.; Thijs, L.; Richart, T.; Kuznetsova, T.; Jin, Y.; Vangronsveld, J.; Roels, H.A.; Staessen, J.A. Cadmium-related mortality and long-term secular trends in the cadmium body burden of an environmentally exposed population. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 1620–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Menke, A.; Muntner, P.; Silbergeld, E.K.; Platz, E.A.; Guallar, E. Cadmium levels in urine and mortality among U.S. adults. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brzoska, M.M.; Moniuszko-Jakoniuk, J. Interactions between cadmium and zinc in the organism. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001, 39, 967–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roels, H.A.; Hoet, P.; Lison, D. Usefulness of biomarkers of exposure to inorganic mercury, lead, or cadmium in controlling occupational and environmental risks of nephrotoxicity. Ren. Fail. 1999, 21, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brzoska, M.M.; Roszczenko, A.; Galazyn-Sidorczuk, M.; Majewska, K. Zinc supplementation can protect from enhanced risk of femoral neck fracture in male rats chronically exposed to cadmium. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2011, 63, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rogalska, J.; Pilat-Marcinkiewicz, B.; Brzoska, M.M. Protective effect of zinc against cadmium hepatotoxicity depends on this bioelement intake and level of cadmium exposure: A study in a rat model. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2011, 193, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bulat, Z.P.; Djukic-Cosic, D.; Malicevic, Z.; Bulat, P.; Matović, V. Zinc or magnesium supplementation modulates cd intoxication in blood, kidney, spleen, and bone of rabbits. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 124, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vance, T.M.; Chun, O.K. Zinc Intake Is Associated with Lower Cadmium Burden in U.S. Adults. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 2741–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Van Wijngaarden, E.; Singer, E.A.; Palapattu, G.S. Prostate-specific antigen levels in relation to cadmium exposure and zinc intake: Results from the 2001–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prostate 2008, 68, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, Y.S.; Caffrey, J.L.; Lin, J.W.; Bayliss, D.; Faramawi, M.F.; Bateson, T.F.; Sonawane, B. Increased risk of cancer mortality associated with cadmium exposures in older Americans with low zinc intake. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2013, 76, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1994. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes3/DataFiles.aspx (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 1999–2000. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=1999 (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 2001–2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2001 (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  27. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 2003–2004. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2003 (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  28. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, Based on November 2018 Submission Data (1999–2016); June 2019, U.S.; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kenneth, D.K.; Sherry, L.; Murphy, J.X.; Elizabeth, A. National Vital Statistics Reports; Department of Health and Human Services; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gunter, E.W.; Lewis, B.G.; Koncikowski, S.M. Laboratory Procedures Used for the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994; Atlanta, G.A., Ed.; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  31. National Center for Health Statistics, NHANES. Laboratory/Medical Technologists Procedures Manual (LPM); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jarup, L. Cadmium overload and toxicity. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002, 17, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. National Center for Health Statistics. Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, NCHS 2011 Linked Mortality Files Matching Methodology, September, 2013; National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2013; Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/data_linkage/mortality/linkage_methods_analytical_support/2011_linked_mor tality_file_matching_methodology.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  34. World Health Organization (WHO). International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10); WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ronksley, P.E.; Ronksley, P.E.; Brien, S.E.; Turner, B.J.; Mukamal, K.J.; Ghali, W.A. Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011, 342, d671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Xi, B.; Veeranki, S.P.; Zhao, M.; Ma, C.; Yan, Y.; Mi, J. Relationship of Alcohol Consumption to All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer-Related Mortality in U.S. Adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 913–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Coughlin, S.S.; Calle, E.E.; Patel, A.V.; Thun, M.J. Predictors of pancreatic cancer mortality among a large cohort of United States adults. Cancer Causes Control 2000, 11, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ratnasinghe, L.D.; Graubard, B.I.; Kahle, L.; Tangrea, J.A.; Taylor, P.R.; Hawk, E. Aspirin use and mortality from cancer in a prospective cohort study. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24, 3177–3184. [Google Scholar]
  39. Aluli, N.E.; Reyes, P.W.; Brady, S.K.; Tsark, J.U.; Jones, K.L.; Mau, M.; Howard, W.J.; Howard, B.V. All-cause and CVD mortality in Native Hawaiians. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010, 89, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dacey, L.J.; Munoz, J.J.; Johnson, E.R.; Leavitt, B.J.; Maloney, C.T.; Morton, J.R.; Olmstead, E.M.; Birkmeyer, J.D.; O′Connor, G.T. Effect of preoperative aspirin use on mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000, 70, 1986–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lantz, P.M.; House, J.S.; Lepkowski, J.M.; Williams, D.R.; Mero, R.P.; Chen, J. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: Results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA 1998, 279, 1703–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jain, R.B. Factors affecting the variability in the observed levels of cadmium in blood and urine among former and current smokers aged 20–64 and ≥65years. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 8837–8851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Padilla, M.A.; Elobeid, M.; Ruden, D.M.; Allison, D.B. An examination of the association of selected toxic metals with total and central obesity indices: NHANES 99–02. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3332–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hecht, E.M.; Arheart, K.L.; Lee, D.J.; Hennekens, C.H.; Hlaing, W.M. Interrelation of Cadmium, Smoking, and Cardiovascular Disease (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey). Am. J. Cardiol. 2016, 118, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nawrot, T.S.; Martens, D.S.; Hara, A.; Plusquin, M.; Vangronsveld, J.; Roels, H.A.; Staessen, J.A. Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium: The meta-analytical evidence. Cancer Causes Control 2015, 26, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nagata, C.; Nagao, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Wada, K.; Tamai, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Kashiki, Y. Cadmium exposure and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 138, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Larsson, S.C.; Wolk, A. Urinary cadmium and mortality from all causes, cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kim, K.; Melough, M.M.; Vance, T.M.; Kim, D.; Noh, H.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K. The relationship between zinc intake and cadmium burden is influenced by smoking status. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 125, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of US adults ≥ 30 y in NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration (n = 15,641).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of US adults ≥ 30 y in NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration (n = 15,641).
NHANES 1988–1994p-Value **NHANES 1999–2004p-Value **
Urinary Cd Concentration (µg/g Creatinine) (Range)Urinary Cd Concentration (µg/g Creatinine) (Range)
Q1 *Q2 *Q3 *Q4 *Q1 *Q2 *Q3 *Q4 *
(n = 3033)(n = 3034)(n = 3035)(n = 3033)(n = 876)(n = 877)(n = 877)(n = 876)
(0.00–0.29)(0.29–0.52)(0.52–0.90)(0.90–23.35)(0–0.22)(0.22–0.37)(0.37–0.62)(0.62–4.20)
Follow-up time, mean, years19.0 (0.2)17.9 (0.2)16.9 (0.3)15.4 (0.2)<0.00019.6 (0.1)9.5 (0.2)9.1 (0.1)8.8 (0.2)<0.0001
Age, mean, years43.0 (0.4)49.1 (0.5)53.9 (0.6)57.8 (0.6)<0.000144.7 (0.6)51.3 (0.6)54.8 (0.7)57.8 (0.7)<0.0001
Men, %57.249.843.535.8<0.000163.045.240.033.7<0.0001
Ethnicity <0.0001 0.073
 White, %86.182.383.386.7 81.583.084.983.1
 Black, %9.013.012.39.9 11.110.610.011.9
 Mexican-American, %4.94.74.43.4 7.46.45.14.9
BMI <0.0005 <0.005
 BMI < 25, %40.937.538.144.2 27.424.130.139.8
 25 ≤ BMI < 30, %35.035.034.435.0 39.139.938.234.0
 BMI ≥ 30, %24.127.527.520.8 33.536.031.726.2
Smoking 1 <0.0001 <0.0001
 Never63.248.334.522.5 67.555.840.124.5
 Former25.432.232.932.7 24.730.035.434.2
 Current (<15 cigarettes/d)6.17.58.49.3 5.27.69.310.8
 Current (≥15 cigarettes/d)5.312.024.234.5 2.66.615.230.5
PIR 2 > 1.3, %88.784.782.177.7<0.000186.783.279.274.4<0.0005
Diabetes mellitus 3, %5.77.78.310.4<0.000114.914.120.015.70.374
Hypertension 4, %22.233.740.647.6<0.000126.237.544.045.6<0.0001
Aspirin use 5, %8.412.615.318.4<0.000110.513.815.621.6<0.001
Supplement use 6, %46.643.142.241.10.069554.359.258.857.90.307
History of CHD7 or stroke, %1.73.55.88.2<0.00012.34.97.310.7<0.0001
History of cancer, %4.29.212.813.8<0.00017.68.311.614.4<0.001
Dietary intake, mean
 Zinc, mg/d12.7 (0.2)11.8 (0.2)11.6 (0.4)10.7 (0.4)<0.0113.5 (0.5)11.7 (0.3)11.1 (0.4)10.7 (0.5)<0.0005
 Alcohol, g/d10.4 (1.0)8.7 (0.8)10.0 (1.2)9.5 (0.9)0.11212.6 (1.4)10.8 (1.7)10.1 (1.8)10.6 (1.7)0.311
 Saturated fats, g/d29.5 (0.5)27.0 (0.5)25.6 (0.8)24.5 (0.4)<0.000130.3 (1.0)26.1 (0.8)24.2 (0.7)23.3 (0.6)<0.0001
* First quartile (Q1), second quartile (Q2), third quartile (Q3) and fourth quartile (Q4) ** Tested by ANOVA or chi-square test. 1 Smokers defined as those who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in lifetime, former smokers defined as smokers who quit. 2 Poverty income ratio. 3 Diabetes defined as fasting plasma glucose level greater than 126 mg/dl or taking medication including insulin and/or medication to lower blood sugar. 4 Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure exceeding 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure over 90 mmHg or taking prescribed medicine for high blood pressure. 5 Aspirin users defined as those using aspirin regularly during the past month. 6 Defined as those using nutritional supplements during the past month. 7 Coronary heart disease (CHD).
Table 2. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) of all-cause, cancer and CVD among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration 1 (n = 15,641).
Table 2. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) of all-cause, cancer and CVD among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration 1 (n = 15,641).
Urinary Cd ConcentrationNo. of DeathCrude Mortality RateAge-Standardized Mortality Rate 1
(per 100,000)(per 100,000)
All-cause death
All53671636.52357.7
Quartile 1 (lowest)705653.81918.7
Quartile 210621202.11915.5
Quartile 315342023.92332.8
Quartile 4 (highest)20663065.52935.0
Cancer death
All1194389.2486.9
Quartile 1 139161.0343.4
Quartile 2198225.6321.6
Quartile 3320460.4475.9
Quartile 4 537842.8733.7
CVD death
All1677483.0754.4
Quartile 1 229196.2680.7
Quartile 2347396.7687.3
Quartile 3501611.5741.2
Quartile 4 600831.7840.8
1 Age standardization is based on Census 2000 US population data.
Table 3. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration (n = 15,641).
Table 3. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration (n = 15,641).
Urinary Cd Concentration (µg/g Creatinine) (Range)p for Trend
Q1 (n = 3910)Q2 (n = 3910)Q3 (n = 3911)Q4 (n = 3910)
(0–0.27)(0.27–0.48)(0.48–0.82)(0.82–23.35)
All-cause
Model 1 11.001.13 (0.96–1.33)1.44 (1.26–1.64)2.04 (1.75–2.37)<0.0001
Model 2 21.000.99 (0.82–1.18)1.13 (0.96–1.33)1.38 (1.14–1.68)<0.0001
Cancer
Model 11.001.01 (0.75–1.36)1.68 (1.31–2.14)2.90 (2.14–3.93)<0.0001
Model 3 31.000.84 (0.60–1.18)1.21 (0.90–1.62)1.54 (1.05–2.27)<0.005
CVD
Model 11.001.12 (0.87–1.45)1.29 (0.99–1.66)1.68 (1.32–2.13)<0.0001
Model 4 41.000.95 (0.73–1.25)1.01 (0.77–1.33)1.22 (0.95–1.57)0.052
1 Model 1: Adjusted for age and gender. 2 Model 2: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, Zn intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD and cancer. 3 Model 3: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, alcohol consumption, Zn intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of cancer. 4 Model 4: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD.
Table 4. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration by tertile of Zn intake (n = 15,641).
Table 4. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of urinary Cd concentration by tertile of Zn intake (n = 15,641).
Urinary Cd Concentration (µg/g Creatinine) (Range)
1st Tertile of Dietary Zn Intakepfor trend
Q1 (n = 1303)Q2 (n = 1304)Q3 (n = 1304)Q4 (n = 1303)
(0.00–0.31)(0.31–0.54)(0.54–0.93)(0.93–16.17)
All-cause
Model 1 11.001.03 (0.82–1.30)1.29 (1.04–1.58)1.73 (1.39–2.15)<0.0001
Model 2 21.001.00 (0.80–1.25)1.04 (0.81–1.34)1.25 (0.96–1.63)0.062
Cancer
Model 11.001.10 (0.63–1.91)2.01 (1.13–3.54)3.71 (2.24–6.14)<0.0001
Model 3 31.000.86 (0.49–1.52)1.25 (0.66–2.36)1.79 (1.07–3.01)<0.005
CVD
Model 11.001.01 (0.73–1.39)1.11 (0.81–1.52)1.17 (0.83–1.65)0.293
Model 4 41.000.92 (0.61–1.39)0.97 (0.65–1.47)0.96 (0.59–1.55)0.958
2nd tertile of dietary Zn intake
Q1 (n = 1293)Q2 (n = 1292)Q3 (n = 1294)Q4 (n = 1293)
(0.00–0.27)(0.27–0.47)(0.47–0.81)(0.81–21.65)
All-cause
Model 1 11.001.15 (0.91–1.46)1.33 (1.08–1.64)1.94 (1.55–2.44)<0.0001
Model 2 21.000.98 (0.75–1.30)0.95 (0.75–1.20)1.25 (0.94–1.66)0.067
Cancer
Model 11.001.79 (1.07–2.98)2.41 (1.59–3.68)3.80 (2.34–6.17)<0.0001
Model 3 31.001.47 (0.83–2.60)1.45 (0.96–2.21)1.79 (0.95–3.37)0.070
CVD
Model 11.001.10 (0.71–1.69)1.24 (0.79–1.96)1.73 (1.18–2.54)<0.001
Model 4 41.001.18 (0.70–1.98)1.17 (0.70–1.94)1.49 (0.89–2.49)0.102
3rd tertile of dietary Zn intake
Q1 (n = 1312)Q2 (n = 1315)Q3 (n = 1314)Q4 (n = 1314)
(0–0.23)(0.23–0.42)(0.42–0.74)(0.74–23.35)
All-cause
Model 1 11.001.09 (0.83–1.43)1.62 (1.22–2.14)2.38 (1.89–3.04)<0.0001
Model 2 21.000.94 (0.68–1.32)1.43 (1.01–2.04)1.71 (1.23–2.38)<0.0001
Cancer
Model 11.000.71 (0.38–1.33)1.29 (0.75–2.23)2.22 (1.30–3.77)<0.0005
Model 3 31.000.65 (0.29–1.42)1.23 (0.61–2.47)1.66 (0.80–3.41)<0.05
CVD
Model 11.001.10 (0.62–1.94)1.48 (0.81–2.69)2.30 (1.31–4.02)<0.0005
Model 4 41.000.75 (0.41–1.35)0.93 (0.51–1.67)1.32 (0.77–2.26)0.081
1 Model 1: Adjusted for age and gender. 2 Model 2: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, Zn intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD and cancer. 3 Model 3: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, alcohol consumption, Zn intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of cancer. 4 Model 4: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD.
Table 5. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of Cd/Zn ratio (n = 15,641).
Table 5. Multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality using Cox proportional hazards models among US adults ≥ 30 years old in NHANES 1988–2004 by quartile of Cd/Zn ratio (n = 15,641).
1988–2004p for Trend
Cd/Zn Ratio (Range)
Q1 (n = 3910)Q2 (n = 3910)Q3 (n = 3911)Q4 (n = 3910)
(0–0.002)(0.002–0.005)(0.005–0.011)(0.011–6.464)
All-cause
Model 1 11.001.36 (1.16–1.60)1.68 (1.43–1.96)2.17 (1.86–2.52)<0.0001
Model 2 21.001.27 (1.04–1.57)1.29 (1.05–1.59)1.54 (1.23–1.93)<0.0005
Cancer
Model 11.001.43 (1.06–1.92)1.87 (1.36–2.59)2.86 (2.09–3.92)<0.0001
Model 3 31.001.27 (0.91–1.76)1.33 (0.90–1.96)1.65 (1.11–2.47)<0.05
CVD
Model 11.001.24 (0.95–1.62)1.71 (1.30–2.26)2.02 (1.60–2.55)<0.0001
Model 4 41.001.17 (0.86–1.58)1.28 (0.99–1.67)1.49 (1.18–1.88)<0.001
1 Model 1: Adjusted for age and gender. 2 Model 2: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD and cancer. 3 Model 3: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, alcohol consumption, aspirin use, supplement use and history of cancer. 4 Model 4: Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, PIR, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, saturated fatty acid intake, aspirin use, supplement use and history of CVD.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, K.; Melough, M.M.; Sakaki, J.R.; Ha, K.; Marmash, D.; Noh, H.; Chun, O.K. Association between Urinary Cadmium-to-Zinc Intake Ratio and Adult Mortality in a Follow-Up Study of NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Nutrients 2020, 12, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010056

AMA Style

Kim K, Melough MM, Sakaki JR, Ha K, Marmash D, Noh H, Chun OK. Association between Urinary Cadmium-to-Zinc Intake Ratio and Adult Mortality in a Follow-Up Study of NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Nutrients. 2020; 12(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Kijoon, Melissa M. Melough, Junichi R. Sakaki, Kyungho Ha, Dalia Marmash, Hwayoung Noh, and Ock K. Chun. 2020. "Association between Urinary Cadmium-to-Zinc Intake Ratio and Adult Mortality in a Follow-Up Study of NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004" Nutrients 12, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop