Actions Targeting the Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
2.2. Inclusion Criteria
2.3. Exclusion Criterion
2.4. Identification of The Research Question.
2.5. Study Selection
2.5.1. Population
2.5.2. Intervention
2.5.3. Comparison
2.5.4. Outcome(s)
2.6. Extraction of Data
2.7. Synthesis of Findings
3. Results
3.1. Study Population
3.2. Study Design
3.3. Geographical Location
3.4. Key Findings
3.4.1. Local, Regional, and National Policies
3.4.2. Regional Changes in Minimum Wage
3.4.3. National Food Fortification Programs
3.4.4. School-Based Interventions
3.4.5. Behavioural Interventions Targeting Mothers
4. Discussion
4.1. Synthesis of Findings
4.2. Strengths and Limitations
4.3. Public Health Impact of Findings
4.4. What is The Way Forward?
4.5. Epidemiological and Operational Research Gaps
4.5.1. Epidemiological Research Gaps
4.5.2. Operational Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
SECTION | ITEM | PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM | REPORTED ON PAGE # |
---|---|---|---|
TITLE | |||
Title | 1 | Identify the report as a scoping review. | 1 |
ABSTRACT | |||
Structured summary | 2 | Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives. | 2 |
INTRODUCTION | |||
Rationale | 3 | Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach. | 4 |
Objectives | 4 | Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives. | 4 |
METHODS | |||
Protocol and registration | 5 | Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number. | No protocol exists |
Eligibility criteria | 6 | Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale. | 4 |
Information sources | 7 | Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed. | 4 |
Search | 8 | Present the full electronic search strategy for at least one database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. | 4 |
Selection of sources of evidence | 9 | State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review. | 5, and Figure 1 |
Data charting process | 10 | Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. | 5 |
Data items | 11 | List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made. | 5 |
Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence | 12 | If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate). | |
Synthesis of results | 13 | Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted. | 5 |
RESULTS | |||
Selection of sources of evidence | 14 | Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram. | Figure 1 |
Characteristics of sources of evidence | 15 | For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations. | Table 1 |
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence | 16 | If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12). | |
Results of individual sources of evidence | 17 | For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives. | 5–8, and Table 1 |
Synthesis of results | 18 | Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives. | Table 1 |
DISCUSSION | |||
Summary of evidence | 19 | Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups. | 8–9 |
Limitations | 20 | Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. | 10 |
Conclusions | 21 | Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps. | 10–13 |
FUNDING | |||
Funding | 22 | Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review. | No sources of funding |
References
- WHO Obesity and Overweight. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 8 November 2019).
- WHO Childhood Overweight and Obesity. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/ (accessed on 8 November 2019).
- WHO Double Burden Malnutrition. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/nutrition/double-burden-malnutrition/en/ (accessed on 1 November 2019).
- Galicia, L.; de Romaña, D.L.; Harding, K.B.; De-Regil, L.M.; Grajeda, R. Tackling malnutrition in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and opportunities. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 2016, 40, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- WHO Double Duty Actions for Nutrition. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255414/WHO-NMH-NHD-17.2-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 1 November 2019).
- Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Smith, V.E. Linear programming models for the determination of palatable human diets. J. Farm Econ. 1959, 41, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darmon, N.; Ferguson, E.; Briend, A. Linear and nonlinear programming to optimize the nutrient density of a population’s diet: An example based on diets of preschool children in rural Malawi. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 75, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rambeloson, Z.J.; Darmon, N.; Ferguson, E.L. Linear programming can help identify practical solutions to improve the nutritional quality of food aid. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nykänen, E.A.; Dunning, H.E.; Aryeetey, R.N.O.; Robertson, A.; Parlesak, A. Nutritionally optimized, culturally acceptable, cost-Minimized diets for low income Ghanaian families using linear programming. Nutrients 2018, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Conklin, A.I.; Ponce, N.A.; Crespi, C.M.; Frank, J.; Nandi, A.; Heymann, J. Economic policy and the double burden of malnutrition: Cross-national longitudinal analysis of minimum wage and women’s underweight and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Faber, M.; van Jaarsveld, P.J.; Kunneke, E.; Kruger, H.S.; Schoeman, S.E.; van Stuijvenberg, M.E. Vitamin A and anthropometric status of South African preschool children from four areas with known distinct eating patterns. Nutrition 2015, 31, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielderman, I.; Vossenaar, M.; Melse-Boonstra, A.; Solomons, N.W. The potential double-burden of vitamin A malnutrition: Under- and overconsumption of fortified table sugar in the Guatemalan highlands. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delisle, H.F.; Receveur, O.; Agueh, V.; Nishida, C. Pilot project of the Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative (NFSI) in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Cotonou, Benin, in West Africa. Glob. Health Promot. 2013, 20, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elkhouri Edde, C.; Delisle, H.; Dabone, C.; Batal, M. Impact of the Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative: Analysis of anthropometric and biochemical data among school-aged children in Ouagadougou. Glob. Health Promot. 2019, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekiyama, M.; Roosita, K.; Ohtsuka, R. Locally Sustainable School Lunch Intervention Improves Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Levels and Body Mass Index among Elementary Schoolchildren in Rural West Java, Indonesia. Nutrients 2017, 9, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mahmudiono, T.; Mamun, A.A.; Nindya, T.S.; Andrias, D.R.; Megatsari, H.; Rosenkranz, R.R. The Effectiveness of Nutrition Education for Overweight/Obese Mother with Stunted Children (NEO-MOM) in Reducing the Double Burden of Malnutrition. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Global Nutrition Report. 2018. Available online: https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/global-nutrition-report-2018/ (accessed on 6 November 2019).
- UNICEF The State of the World’s Children. 2019. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-of-worlds-children-2019 (accessed on 15 November 2019).
- Pradeilles, R.; Baye, K.; Holdsworth, M. Addressing malnutrition in low-and middle-income countries with double-duty actions. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2018, 78, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rothman, K.J.; Moore, L.L.; Singer, M.R.; Nguyen, U.S.; Mannino, S.; Milunsky, A. Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 1369–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, L.H.; Haskell, M. Estimating the potential for vitamin A toxicity in women and young children. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2907S–2919S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirasa, F.; Mitchell, L.J.; Rigby, R.; Harris, N. Family and community factors shaping the eating behaviour of preschool-aged children in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review of interventions. Prev. Med. 2019, 129, 105827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chavasit, V.; Kasemsup, V.; Tontisirin, K. Thailand conquered under-nutrition very successfully but has not slowed obesity. Obes. Rev. 2013, 14, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wojtyła, A. Application of the hypothesis of Developmental Origin of Health and Diseases (DOHaD) in epidemiological studies of women at reproductive age and pregnant women in Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2011, 18, 355–364. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, J.; Williams, R.; McEvoy, M.; MacDonald-Wicks, L.; Patterson, A. Is Higher Consumption of Animal Flesh Foods Associated with Better Iron Status among Adults in Developed Countries? A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2016, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uzhova, I.; Penalvo, J.L. Mediterranean diet and cardio-metabolic health: What is the role of meat. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Englberger, L.; Lorens, A.; Pretrick, M.; Tara, M.J.; Johnson, E. Local food policies can help promote local foods and improve health: A case study from the Federated States of Micronesia. Hawaii Med. J. 2011, 70, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
- Buonomo, E.; Moramarco, S.; Tappa, A.; Palmieri, S.; Di Michele, S.; Biondi, G.; Agosti, G.; Alessandroni, C.; Caredda, E.; Palombi, L. Access to health care, nutrition and dietary habits among school-age children living in socio-economic inequality contexts: Results from the “For Good: Sport is Well-Being” programme. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. WHO Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Policy Brief Series; WHO Reference No. WHO/NMH/NHD/14.2; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Double-Duty Actions to Tackle the Double Burden of Malnutrition [5] |
---|
Promotion and protection of exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months Promotion of appropriate early and complementary feeding in infants Maternal nutrition and antenatal care programs Regulations on marketing School food policies and programs |
Reference | Year | Country | Study Design | Intervention | Sample Size | Age | Key Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faber et al. [12] | 2015 | South Africa | Post intervention survey | National vitamin A supplementation program introduced in 2002, targeting children ages 6 to 59 months from low socioeconomic communities | KwaZulu-Natal (n = 140) and Limpopo (n = 206); an urban area in the Northern Cape (n = 194); and an urban metropolitan area in the Western Cape (n = 207) | Mean age of the children: 3.7 ± 1.1 years | Large variations in anthropometric status highlight the importance of targeting specific nutrition interventions, taking into account the double burden of overnutrition and undernutrition |
Bielderman et al. [13] | 2016 | Guatemala | Post intervention survey | Population-wide vitamin A fortification of table sugar program spanning two decades | Convenience sample of 234 pregnant and lactating women in the Western Highlands | Mean age of the mothers: 24 ± 6 years | There was a differential impact of the national program; rural women not meeting their status-specific vitamin A were 3.5 times more common than urban women. In the urban area, 26 women (21%) had vitamin A intakes above 1500 μg on the day of data collection |
Sekiyama et al. [16] | 2017 | Indonesia | Pre-post study | One-month school lunch intervention aiming at sustainability and based on children’s nutritional intake, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and body mass index (BMI) | 68 | 114.6 months ± 8.8 (fourth grade) | After the intervention, hemoglobin (p < 0.05) and hematocrit (p < 0.05) levels were significantly improved. BMI significantly increased in the baseline underweight/normal group (p < 0.001) but not in the overweight/obese group |
Mahmudiono et al. [17] | 2018 | Indonesia | Randomized controlled trial | Behavioral intervention (including home visits) coupled with a government food supplementation program and educational materials for children | Seventy-one mother–child pairs | 39.57 months in intervention group (Neo Mom group) and 40.24 months (control group) | Strong improvement in maternal self-efficacy to engage in physical activity, eat fruits and vegetables, and to provide children with growth-promoting animal protein, but no significant influence on child height gain |
Nykänen et al. [10] | 2018 | Ghana | Modelling study | Calculations included implementing cultural acceptability for families living in extreme and moderate poverty | NA | NA | Using culturally acceptable food baskets (FB) of minimum cost could be developed for urban and rural low-income Ghanaian families for a month when assuming that half of the household income is spent on food. These FBs would fulfil all nutrient recommendations, and at the same time can help to prevent obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs). |
Conklin et al. [11] | 2018 | Twenty-four low-income countries | Modelling study | Examine changes in minimum wage associated with changes in women’s weight status | NA | NA | A US $10 rise in monthly minimum wage significantly accelerated the decline in women’s underweight prevalence, but had no association with the pace of growth in obesity prevalence. |
Edde et al. [15] | 2019 | Burkina Faso | Pre and post interventions with controls | Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative (NFSI) | 699 and 651 pupils in 2009 and 2014, respectively | 2009: 8 to 11 years (454 or 70 %); 12 to 14 years (195 or 30%) | A modest role for the Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative in reducing thinness, but not overweight |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Menon, S.; Peñalvo, J.L. Actions Targeting the Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010081
Menon S, Peñalvo JL. Actions Targeting the Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12(1):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010081
Chicago/Turabian StyleMenon, Sonia, and José L. Peñalvo. 2020. "Actions Targeting the Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review" Nutrients 12, no. 1: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010081
APA StyleMenon, S., & Peñalvo, J. L. (2020). Actions Targeting the Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review. Nutrients, 12(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010081