Next Article in Journal
Infant Gut Microbiota Associated with Fine Motor Skills
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) with the Clinical Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (Acne Inversa)
Previous Article in Journal
The Association between Nutritional Status and In-Hospital Mortality among Patients with Heart Failure—A Result of the Retrospective Nutritional Status Heart Study 2 (NSHS2)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diarrhea Predominant-Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D): Effects of Different Nutritional Patterns on Intestinal Dysbiosis and Symptoms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/nu13051671
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of the Chronotype Score with Circulating Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Concentrations

by
Luigi Barrea
1,2,*,†,
Giovanna Muscogiuri
2,3,4,†,
Gabriella Pugliese
2,3,
Chiara Graziadio
2,
Maria Maisto
5,
Francesca Pivari
6,
Andrea Falco
7,
Gian Carlo Tenore
5,
Annamaria Colao
2,3,4 and
Silvia Savastano
2,3
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Umanistiche, Università Telematica Pegaso, 80143 Napoli, Italy
2
Centro Italiano per la cura e il Benessere del Paziente con Obesità (C.I.B.O), Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Unit of Endocrinology, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University Medical School of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Cattedra Unesco “Educazione alla Salute e allo Sviluppo Sostenibile”, University Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
6
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
7
Department of Science and Technology (DST), Università del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These Authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2021, 13(5), 1671; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051671
Submission received: 21 March 2021 / Revised: 10 May 2021 / Accepted: 13 May 2021 / Published: 14 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microbiota in Human Health and Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Individual differences in the chronotype, an attitude that best expresses the individual circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms, have been associated with cardiometabolic risk and gut dysbiosis. Up to now, there are no studies evaluating the association between chronotypes and circulating TMAO concentrations, a predictor of cardiometabolic risk and a useful marker of gut dysbiosis. In this study population (147 females and 100 males), subjects with the morning chronotype had the lowest BMI and waist circumference (p < 0.001), and a better metabolic profile compared to the other chronotypes. In addition, the morning chronotype had the highest adherence to the Mediterranean diet (p < 0.001) and the lowest circulating TMAO concentrations (p < 0.001). After adjusting for BMI and adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score was still kept (r = −0.627, p < 0.001). Using a linear regression analysis, higher chronotype scores were mostly associated with lower circulating TMAO concentrations (β = −0.479, t = −12.08, and p < 0.001). Using a restricted cubic spline analysis, we found that a chronotype score ≥59 (p < 0.001, R2 = −0.824) demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with knots <59 (neither chronotype) and <41 (evening chronotype). The current study reported the first evidence that higher circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with the evening chronotype that, in turn, is usually linked to an unhealthy lifestyle mostly characterized by low adherence to the MD.

1. Introduction

Circadian rhythms, endogenously driven cycles entrained to the 24 h external environment, exert broad-ranging control over many biological processes, including feeding behavior, the activity of the gastrointestinal system, and gut microbiota [1]. On the other side, a plausible role for the feeding behavior and gut microbiota in modifying metabolism and circadian rhythms has been well described [2]. In humans, there are large interindividual differences in behavioral and biological rhythms [3,4], which lead to different circadian phenotypes, named chronotypes [5]. In particular, there are three different chronotypes expressed as a continuum between two extremes, from morningness to eveningness, with a third in an intermediate position. The morning chronotype is associated with greater morning energy to go to bed earlier and wake up early, and, in summary, a preference for diurnal activities [6]. Contrariwise, the evening chronotype is related to irregular sleep and wake-up patterns, later sleep and rising, with a tendency for nocturnal activities [7,8,9]. Disruption of the endogenous central and peripheral clocks is associated with adverse health outcomes, such as excess weight, metabolic dysfunctions, and gut dysbiosis [10]. Gut dysbiosis is an abnormal intestinal microbiota community of organisms resident in the gastrointestinal tract, with increased host susceptibility to pro-inflammatory diseases [11]. Several epidemiological studies have shown that the evening chronotype tends to have more health problems and greater mortality compared to the morning chronotype [12,13]. More recently, a dangerous connection has been established between a blunted microbial profile and unhealthy feeding behavior in subjects with the evening chronotype [14].
Trimethylamine (TMA) is the product of the metabolism of dietary nutrients commonly present in the Western diet, such as choline and carnitine, which are found in red meat, eggs, milk, and cheese [15]. TMA is further metabolized in the liver to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) [15]. Despite the fact that there is a large consensus that circulating TMAO concentrations are mainly dependent on dietary patterns, a relevant contribution to the liver production of TMAO is provided by the fermentation of dietary TMA produced by gut bacteria, including Proteobacteria and Firmicutes [16]. Through mediating inflammatory processes, TMAO would have a potential association with most chronic non-communicable diseases, including cancer, type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and Alzheimer’s disease [15]. In the case of gut dysbiosis, an increase in the microorganisms that produce TMAO has been observed, thus suggesting TMAO as one of the biomarkers for metabolite profiling and diagnostic suitability for dysbiosis [17].
The Mediterranean dietary pattern, along with physical activity promotion and circadian clock entrainment, seems to represent a useful combination for dealing with several chronic non-communicable diseases [18]. In addition, the Mediterranean dietary pattern is also the most characterized factor that influences the gut microbiota [19]. The complexity of studying the gut microbiota is, however, characterized by a high intra-individual variability of the daily food consumption of each subject that might potentially hinder the robustness and reproducibility of microbiota—disease associative studies [20]. We previously reported that the lowest adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) was associated with the highest circulating TMAO concentrations [21]. Up to now, there are no studies evaluating the association between the three chronotypes and circulating TMAO concentrations.
Considering the influence of the MD on both chronotypes and circulating TMAO concentrations, this study aimed to evaluate the possible association of the three chronotypes with circulating TMAO concentrations in a sample of the adult population according to sex, lifestyle habits, BMI, and adherence to the MD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Setting

We carried out an observational cross-sectional study from December 2016 to January 2021 at the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Endocrinology, University Federico II, Naples (Italy). The Ethical Committee “Federico II” approved this study (n. 173/16), which was carried out following the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for clinical studies. All study participants, after being informed of the purpose and procedures, provided informed consent.

2.2. Population Study

Two hundred forty-seven Caucasian adult subjects aged between 20 and 68 years of both sexes were consecutively enrolled in the same urban area in Naples in Italy among patients of our clinic, volunteers, hospital employees, and participants in the Obesity, Programs of nutrition, Education, Research and Assessment of the best treatment (OPERA) project [22]. It was confirmed that all women were neither pregnant nor lactating. The pathological and pharmacological anamnesis of all participating subjects was collected. We decided to enroll only adults aiming at increasing sample homogeneity, and the following exclusion criteria were applied:
  • Impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation <90 mL/min/1.73 m2);
  • A confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (in accordance with the American Diabetes Association criteria: two confirmations of fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol)). Subjects taking hypoglycemic drugs were considered to have type 2 diabetes [23];
  • Cardiovascular disease, including: previous cardiovascular events, atherosclerosis, coronary artery or peripheral vascular disease;
  • Current use of hypolipidemic or anti-inflammatory drugs;
  • Current therapy or in the two months prior to enrollment with antibiotics or probiotics;
  • Specific diets such as vegetarian or vegan regimes;
  • Current supplementation with vitamins, minerals, or antioxidants;
  • Alcohol abuse was diagnosed according to the criteria of DSM-V [24];
  • Shift working.

2.3. Lifestyle Information

Information on lifestyle, including cigarette smoking habits and physical activity, was collected from all participants. In particular, current smokers have been defined as those who smoke at least one cigarette a day, former smokers are those who have not smoked for at least a year, while all others have been defined as non-current smokers. If subjects performed at least 30 min of physical activity per day, they were classified as “Physical activity YES”, if not “Physical activity NO”, as previously reported in other studies [25,26,27].

2.4. Anthropometric Measurements and Blood Pressure

All participants were evaluated in the morning after at least 8 h of fasting by the same nutritionist with proven experience in assessing body composition and nutritional status, as previously reported [28,29,30]. All subjects were measured wearing light clothing and without shoes: height was obtained using a wall-mounted stadiometer (Seca 711; Seca, Hamburg, Germany) and body weight was assessed with a calibrated balance beam scale (Seca 711; Seca, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 kg. Weight and height were measured to calculate the body mass index (BMI) (weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2), kg/m2), which was used to classify subjects in accordance with WHO’s criteria as normal weight: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25.0–29.9 kg/m2; grade I obesity, 30.0–34.9 kg/m2; grade II obesity, 35.0–39.9 kg/m2; grade III obesity ≥40.0 kg/m2 [31]. Waist circumference (WC) was obtained using a non-stretchable measuring tape to the closest 0.1 cm according to the National Center for Health Statistics [32], at the narrowest point of the abdomen or, if this was not visible, at the point between the lower edge of the rib cage and the iliac crest. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) were measured in all subjects three times using a random zero sphygmomanometer (Gelman Hawksley Ltd., Sussex, UK) after 10 min sitting at rest, finally reporting the average of the last two values.

2.5. Determination of Circulating TMAO Concentrations

Circulating TMAO concentrations were obtained in all participants and samples were stored at −80 °C, having been shown that under these conditions TMAO remains stable for years [33]. Circulating TMAO concentrations were measured using the method described by Beale and Airs [34], and reported in our previous study [35,36,37]. The chromatographic separation was carried out with a guard column (HILIC), in combination with a Luna HILIC column (150 × 3 mm, 5 µm particles), both supplied by Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA).

2.6. Assay Methods

All participants underwent a blood draw during the morning (8–10 a.m.) in a state of fasting for at least 8 h and all samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Roche Modular Analytics System was used to perform all biochemical analyses including fasting glucose, lipid profile, and transaminases, and a direct method of homogeneous enzymatic assay was used to measure low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The Immunolite Diagnostic Products Co, Los Angeles, CA, USA with solid-phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay kit was used to measure fasting insulin levels. As already reported [38,39,40], the intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was <5.5%.

2.7. Adherence to MD

A qualified nutritionist during a face-to-face interview assessed adherence to MD using the 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) developed for the PREvencion con DIetaMEDiterranea (PREDIMED) study [41], as previously reported [42,43,44]. For each item, a score from 0 to 1 can be assigned; therefore, MEDAS-derived MD score was calculated as follows: lowest adherence (Score 0–5), average adherence (Score 6–9) and highest adherence (Score ≥ 10) [41].

2.8. Evaluation of Chronotype

Chronotype was obtained with the questionnaire MEQ [6], including 19 items about the subjective sensation of sleep and energy during the day and the preferred time to rest and to carry out demanding activities, with a score ranging from 16–84. Based on the score obtained, the participants were classified as being a morning (59–86), neither (42–58), or evening (16–41) chronotype, as previously reported [45].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were collected and analyzed using the MedCalc® package and SAS 9.3 program. The data distribution was evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the abnormal data were normalized by logarithm. Skewed variables (age, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, circulating TMAO concentrations, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, AST, ALT, γGT, MEDAS-derived MD score, and chronotype score) were converted into figures and tables. Results have been described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage/number.
Differences according to sex and lifestyle habits were analyzed by Student’s unpaired t-test, while the differences among the classes of BMI and categories of MEDAS and chronotype were evaluated by ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. The chi square (χ2) test was used to evaluate the differences in the frequency distribution of physical activity, smoke, and MEDAS categories. The correlations between the study variables were performed using Pearson r correlation coefficients after adjusting for BMI and MEDAS-derived MD score. Proportional Odds Ratio (OR) models, 95% Interval Confidence (IC), and R2 were used to assess the associations among both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype scores on sex, lifestyle habits, and MEDAS categories. A linear regression was performed with circulating TMAO concentrations as the dependent variable and chronotype score, age, physical activity, smoking, BMI, and MEDAS-derived MD score as independent variables. Tolerance and variance inflation factor were calculated to determine the presence of collinearity. In addition, a logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between chronotype score and circulating TMAO concentrations above the median (6.80 µM). A restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to smooth the nonlinear relationship between chronotype score predictive of circulating TMAO concentrations and predict the factor levels that explain the pattern of linear correlation within variables. A separate curve was fit to each segment. The location of the knots was set according to the three categories of the chronotype: evening (16–41), neither (42–58), and morning (59–86) chronotype [6].

3. Results

The study population consisted of 247 participants, 147 females (49.5%) and 100 males (40.5%), aged 20–68 years. Ninety-seven subjects practiced physical activity at least 5 days a week (39.3%), while current smokers were 86 individuals (34.8%). BMIs ranged from 19 to 59 kg/m2.
Table 1 summarizes the lifestyle information, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, nutritional parameter, and chronotype in the total study population. As shown in Table 1, most of the participants were normal weight (58.7%), had an average adherence to the MD (40.9%) and a morning chronotype type (62.3%).
Table 2 reports circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score according to sex, smoking, physical activity, BMI categories, and MEDAS categories. Circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score were significantly lower and higher, respectively, either in females (p < 0.001), or among physically active subjects or non-smokers (p < 0.001). Using the BMI and MEDAS categories to stratify the sample, circulating TMAO concentrations increased significantly along with the increase in BMI and decreased with increased MEDAS-derived MD score (p < 0.001). Contrariwise, the score of chronotype reduced significantly along with the increase in BMI and increased with a higher MEDAS-derived MD score (p < 0.001).
Table 3 reports sex, age, lifestyle information, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and nutritional parameter in the study population grouped based on chronotype categories. Subjects with morning and evening chronotypes were older than those with the evening chronotype (p < 0.001). Participants with the morning chronotype followed a healthier lifestyle; in particular, they performed more regular physical activity (p = 0.006) and most of them were non-smokers (p = 0.004). Subjects with the morning chronotype had the lowest BMI (p < 0.001), WC (p < 0.001), PAS (p = 0.013), and the best metabolic profile compared to subjects with the other chronotypes. In addition, subjects with the morning chronotype had the highest MEDAS-derived MD score (p < 0.001), with the highest percentage of subjects with higher adherence to the MD (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 3.
Figure 1 reports circulating TMAO concentrations across the chronotype categories. In detail, stratifying the sample population according to the three chronotype categories, circulating TMAO concentrations increased significantly (p < 0.001), with the lowest score in the subjects with the morning chronotype category (4.1 ± 2.6 µM).

Correlation Analysis

The correlations between both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype scores with continuous variables age, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and MEDAS-derived MD score are summarized in Table 4. All parameters evaluated in this study were significantly associated with both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype.
The correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score was still evident (p < 0.001) after adjusting for BMI and the MEDAS-derived MD score (Figure 2).
The results of a bivariate proportional OR model carried out to assess the association of both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score with the categorical variables are reported in Table 5. Both circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score were significantly associated with sex (p < 0.001), smoking (p < 0.001), and physical activity (p < 0.001). In addition, the highest circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with the lowest adherence to the MD (OR 1.53, p < 0.001) and the evening chronotype (OR 2.31, p < 0.001). Likewise, the lowest chronotype score was associated with the lowest adherence to the MD (OR 0.95, p < 0.001) (Table 5).
We performed a linear regression model to evaluate the association between circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score, adjusting for potential confounders including age, BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, smoking, and MEDAS-derived MD score. In this model, the chronotype score was strongly associated with circulating TMAO concentrations (β = −0.479, t = −12.08, and p < 0.001). Results are reported in Table 6.
A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the chronotype score and circulating TMAO concentrations above the median (6.80 µM). In this model, the chronotype score was significantly associated with the circulating TMAO concentrations above the median value (OR = 0.50, p < 0.001, 95% IC = 0.38 to 0.65, R2 = 0.66).
A restricted cubic spline analysis was then used to obtain the range of values of the chronotype score that split up with knots (evening, neither, and morning chronotype) defining the relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations at the end of one segment and the start of the next. In particular, a chronotype score ≥59 (p < 0.001, estimator = −0.0037, standard error = 0.0004, R2 = −0.824) demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with knots <59 (neither chronotype) and <41 (evening chronotype); Figure 3.

4. Discussion

In this cross-sectional observational study, we investigated circulating TMAO concentrations, a gut-derived metabolite that has proven to be a marker of gut dysbiosis, and cardiometabolic risk in three different chronotypes (morning, evening, and neither) according to sex, lifestyle habits, BMI, and adherence to the MD. The morning chronotype was observed in 62.3% of the subjects and was associated with the lowest anthropometric measurements, the better metabolic profile, and the higher adherence to the MD compared to intermediate and evening chronotypes. In addition, the highest percentage of morning chronotype was present in women, non-smokers, and physically active subjects. Stratifying the sample population according to the three chronotype categories, circulating TMAO concentrations decreased significantly along with the chronotype score, with the lowest values in the subjects with the morning chronotype category. As expected, while circulating TMAO concentrations were positively correlated with altered anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and lower MEDAS-derived MD score, the chronotype score was inversely correlated with those variables. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that reported a significant inverse correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score, independently of common potential confounding covariates, such as anthropometric measurements and adherence to the MD. In particular, lower chronotype scores were mostly associated with higher circulating TMAO concentrations. Finally, using a restricted cubic spline analysis, we found that the morning chronotype demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with neither and evening chronotypes.
Chronotype can be defined as an attitude of behavioral preference for eveningness or morningness, or an individual measurement based on the timing of reported behaviors related to the sleep–wake cycle [46]. On the other side, in a given population, both genetic and environmental factors, including diet and gut microbiota, influence the distribution of chronotypes [2,46,47,48]. In particular, subjects with the evening chronotype are often chronically affected by misalignment in biological rhythms and irregular sleep and wake-up patterns, with a preference for nocturnal activities [49]; these conditions may increase, in the long term, the levels of both oxidative stress and chronic inflammation and alter the intestinal microbiota, thus increasing the risk of chronic diseases [50]. Consistently, a growing amount of evidence indicates that the evening chronotype is associated with chronic non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, obesity, metabolic syndrome [7,51,52], and gut dysbiosis [2,46,47,48]. Lately, the role of the circadian rhythm in the regulation of the gastrointestinal tract has been gaining a lot of interest [53]. Of interest, Nojkov et al. [54] reported that circadian alterations associated with shift work can lead to an increased incidence of diseases of the digestive system.
TMAO is a gut-derived metabolite depending on the function of the intestinal barrier, which is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and mortality [55]. Besides the gut microbiota, circulating TMAO concentrations are determined by many factors, such as age, gender, and dietary nutrients [15]. We previously reported that the circulating TMAO concentrations were negatively associated with a healthy dietary pattern, such as MD and 25-OH vitamin D levels [35,36]. In addition, we also found that the circulating TMAO concentrations represented an early biomarker of adipose dysfunction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [36]. In this context, the present study further increased the knowledge on the link between circulating TMAO concentrations and the adherence to the MD, as we evidenced that higher circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with an unhealthy lifestyle expressed not only by the low adherence to the MD, but also by the evening chronotype, a trait that best expresses the individual circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms and that has been previously associated with gut dysbiosis [2,10,46,47,48].
In line with our findings, it is well described that the low chronotype score, characterized by the evening chronotype on the one side, and higher circulating TMAO concentrations on the other side, is associated with an unhealthy metabolic profile, gut dysbiosis, and higher cardiovascular risk [7,56,57,58]. Thus, it is tempting to speculate on the association between the evening chronotype and gut dysbiosis, and the increased circulating TMAO concentrations, as the product of the oxygenation of TMA, might represent a biomarker of the increased intestinal translocation of TMA linked to gut dysbiosis and the altered intestinal barrier.
As a potential translational application, this study suggests that the association between evening chronotype and high circulating TMAO concentrations might potentiate the cardiometabolic risk. The possible bidirectional relationship between chronotype score and circulating TMAO concentrations has been resumed in Figure 4.
This association might be of strategic utility considering that a dose–response meta-analysis of clinical studies indicated that the risk of all-cause mortality increased by 7.6% per 10 μM increment of circulating TMAO concentrations [59]. Nevertheless, it should be considered that the 19-item MEQ chronotype questionnaire is easy to administer and to analyze, while the detection of circulating TMAO concentrations requires venous sampling and dedicated laboratory facilities.
The main limitation of this study is that the cross-sectional design does not allow us to identify any causal associations between the variables analyzed. Therefore, we cannot establish the prognostic value of the chronotype score for predicting circulating TMAO concentrations. Secondly, we did not include in this study the metagenome analysis to explore gut microbiota dysbiosis in subjects with different chronotypes closely. However, it is well known that the very changeable composition of the gut microbiota might potentially hinder the robustness and reproducibility of microbiota—disease associative studies [20,60,61,62]. In addition, circulating TMAO concentrations have recently been included among the reliable biomarkers for gut dysbiosis [17]. A further limitation was that we did not include other metabolites involved in the same pathway of TMAO, such as carnitine, betaine, or choline. Nevertheless, the relationships between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronic non-communicable diseases were also independent of choline or other metabolites [63,64,65]. A further issue could arise from the use of the 14-item MEDAS questionnaire in an Italian sample population. The 14-item MEDAS questionnaire was previously validated for the Spanish population in the PREDIMED study. Nevertheless, the 14-item MEDAS questionnaire has been widely applied as a suitable tool for identifying the dietary habits of a population different from the Spanish one in several other countries around the world. In particular, very recently the 14-item MEDAS questionnaire was simultaneously validated by García-Conesa, M.T. et al. (2020) [66] in different Mediterranean countries, including Italy. The results of this study supported a general fair-to-moderate concordance for many of the food items of the 14-item MEDAS questionnaire principally in several Southern European countries around the Mediterranean area, thus pointing out the validity of this questionnaire as a rapid and flexible tool to evaluate the adherence to the MD. Finally, although the influence of chronotype upon sleep behavior is well recognized, we did not evaluate sleep quality in this study.
A major strength of this cross-sectional study is the strong characterization of our sample population, with the exclusion of conditions that can alter the metabolism of TMAO, such as type 2 diabetes and impaired kidney function. In addition, the single-center study allowed us to increase the homogeneity of the sample. Furthermore, we included a variety of potential covariates, such as adherence to the MD, anthropometric measurements and lifestyle, to limit the effect of confounding factors on the association of circulating TMAO concentrations with the chronotypes. A further strength was the assessment of circulating TMAO concentrations in plasma samples rather than in urine ones. Circulating TMAO concentrations are largely dependent upon dietary intake and urinary excretion, with an overlap in distribution among both healthy and diseased populations [67]. However, Krüger et al. [68] reported that although TMAO concentrations in plasma and urine might be differentially affected depending on the food source, the current fish consumption, one of the items included in the MEDAS-derived MD score, affected more urinary than plasma TMAO. In addition, the chronotype questionnaire was evaluated using a validated questionnaire, the 19-item MEQ questionnaire [6]. In particular, this questionnaire is poorly time demanding, requires poor collaboration from individuals, and provides a clear result to the interviewees immediately after finishing the questionnaire. Moreover, the MEQ questionnaire is not self-reported as it is face-to-face, administered by only one expert nutritionist to limit any bias regarding proper completion of the questionnaire and to avoid inter-operator variability.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the current study presented the first evidence that high circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with an unhealthy lifestyle expressed not only by low adherence to the MD, but also by the evening chronotype, a trait that best expresses the individual circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms. Our results support the evidence that that the evaluation of the chronotype should be included in the management of patients in a nutrition and dietetics clinic by a qualified nutritionist. This allows speculation on the plausible positive and cost-effective effects of carrying out dietary interventions according to the chronotype as support for clinical trials aiming to reduce circulating TMAO concentrations, and consequently, cardiometabolic risk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B., G.M. and S.S.; methodology, L.B., G.M. and S.S.; software, L.B., G.M., G.P. and S.S.; validation, A.C. and S.S.; formal analysis, L.B., G.M., A.F. and S.S.; investigation, G.P., C.G., M.M., F.P.; resources, A.C.; data curation, L.B., G.M., A.F. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B., G.M. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, A.C., G.C.T., S.S.; visualization, A.C.; supervision, S.S. and A.C.; project administration, L.B., G.M. and S.S.; funding acquisition, A.C. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca: PRIN 2017FM74HK.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Federico II University (protocol code n. 173/16 approved in 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Results attained in this study are included in the manuscript. Individual data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

CibEndo: Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) http://www.societaitalianadiendocrinologia.it/html/cnt/cibendo.asp, accessed on 21 January 2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frank, J.; Gupta, A.; Osadchiy, V.; Mayer, E.A. Brain-Gut-Microbiome Interactions and Intermittent Fasting in Obesity. Nutrients 2021, 13, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Parkar, S.G.; Kalsbeek, A.; Cheeseman, J.F. Potential role for the gut microbiota in modulating host circadian rhythms and metabolic health. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mongrain, V.; Lavoie, S.; Selmaoui, B.; Paquet, J.; Dumont, M. Phase relationships between sleep-wake cycle and underlying circadian rhythms in morningness-eveningness. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2004, 19, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adan, A.; Natale, V. Gender differences in morningness-eveningness preference. Chronobiol. Int. 2002, 19, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roenneberg, T.; Allebrandt, K.V.; Merrow, M.; Vetter, C. Social jetlag and obesity. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 939–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Horne, J.A.; Ostberg, O. A self assessment questionnaire to determine Morningness Eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int. J. Chronobiol. 1976, 4, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Makarem, N.; Paul, J.; Giardina, E.G.V.; Liao, M.; Aggarwal, B. Evening chronotype is associated with poor cardiovascular health and adverse health behaviors in a diverse population of women. Chronobiol. Int. 2020, 37, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aguilar-Galarza, A.; García-Gasca, T.; Mejía, C.; Díaz-Muñoz, M.; Pérez-Mendoza, M.; Anaya-Loyola, M.A.; Garaulet, M. Evening chronotype associates with increased triglyceride levels in young adults in two independent populations. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 40, 2373–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Henry, C.J.; Kaur, B.; Quek, R.Y.C. Chrononutrition in the management of diabetes. Nutr. Diabetes 2020, 10, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mazri, F.H.; Manaf, Z.A.; Shahar, S.; Ludin, A.F.M. The association between chronotype and dietary pattern among adults: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 17, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Voigt, R.M.; Forsyth, C.B.; Keshavarzian, A. Circadian rhythms: A regulator of gastrointestinal health and dysfunction. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 13, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fabbian, F.; Zucchi, B.; De Giorgi, A.; Tiseo, R.; Boari, B.; Salmi, R.; Cappadona, R.; Gianesini, G.; Bassi, E.; Signani, F.; et al. Chronotype, gender and general health. Chronobiol. Int. 2016, 33, 863–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Basnet, S.; Merikanto, I.; Lahti, T.; Männistö, S.; Laatikainen, T.; Vartiainen, E.; Partonen, T. Associations of common noncommunicable medical conditions and chronic diseases with chronotype in a population-based health examination study. Chronobiol. Int. 2017, 34, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Redondo-Useros, N.; Nova, E.; González-Zancada, N.; Díaz, L.E.; Gómez-Martínez, S.; Marcos, A. Microbiota and lifestyle: A special focus on diet. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coutinho-Wolino, K.S.; Ludmila, L.F.M.; de Oliveira Leal, V.; Mafra, D.; Stockler-Pinto, M.B. Can diet modulate trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) production? What do we know so far? Eur. J. Nutr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zeisel, S.H.; Warrier, M. Trimethylamine N-Oxide, the Microbiome, and Heart and Kidney Disease. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2017, 37, 157–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rüb, A.M.; Tsakmaklis, A.; Gräfe, S.K.; Simon, M.-C.; Vehreschild, M.J.; Wuethrich, I. Biomarkers of human gut microbiota diversity and dysbiosis. Biomark. Med. 2021, 15, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Caprara, G. Mediterranean-type dietary pattern and physical activity: The winning combination to counteract the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDS). Nutrients 2021, 13, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. García-Montero, C.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Gómez-Lahoz, A.M.; Pekarek, L.; Castellanos, A.J.; Noguerales-Fraguas, F.; Coca, S.; Guijarro, L.G.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Asúnsolo, A.; et al. Nutritional Components in Western Diet Versus Mediterranean Diet at the Gut Microbiota-Immune System Interplay. Implications for Health and Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leeming, E.R.; Louca, P.; Gibson, R.; Menni, C.; Spector, T.D.; Le Roy, C.I. The complexities of the diet-microbiome relationship: Advances and perspectives. Genome. Med. 2021, 13, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barrea, L.; Annunziata, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Laudisio, D.; Di Somma, C.; Maisto, M.; Tenore, G.C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Trimethylamine N-oxide, Mediterranean diet, and nutrition in healthy, normal-weight adults: Also a matter of sex? Nutrition 2019, 62, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L.; Laudisio, D.; Pugliese, G.; Aprano, S.; Framondi, L.; Di Matteo, R.; Riccio, P.A.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A. The opera prevention project. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 72, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. American Diabetes Association. Summary of Revisions: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020, 43 (Suppl. 1), S4–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Grant, B.F.; Goldstein, R.B.; Saha, T.D.; Patricia Chou, S.; Jung, J.; Zhang, H.; Pickering, R.P.; June Ruan, W.; Smith, S.M.; Huang, B.; et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions III. JAMA Psychiatry 2015, 72, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Barrea, L.; Altieri, B.; Muscogiuri, G.; Laudisio, D.; Annunziata, G.; Colao, A.; Faggiano, A.; Savastano, S. Impact of nutritional status on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) aggressiveness. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Di Somma, C.; Annunziata, G.; Megna, M.; Falco, A.; Balato, A.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Coffee consumption, metabolic syndrome and clinical severity of psoriasis: Good or bad stuff? Arch. Toxicol. 2018, 92, 1831–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Barrea, L.; Di Somma, C.; Macchia, P.E.; Falco, A.; Savanelli, M.C.; Orio, F.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Influence of nutrition on somatotropic axis: Milk consumption in adult individuals with moderate-severe obesity. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Savanelli, M.C.; Scarano, E.; Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L.; Vuolo, L.; Rubino, M.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A.; Di Somma, C. Cardiovascular risk in adult hypopituitaric patients with growth hormone deficiency: Is there a role for vitamin D? Endocrine 2016, 52, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Savastano, S.; Di Somma, C.; Colao, A.; Barrea, L.; Orio, F.; Finelli, C.; Pasanisi, F.; Contaldo, F.; Tarantino, G. Preliminary data on the relationship between circulating levels of Sirtuin 4, anthropometric and metabolic parameters in obese subjects according to growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 status. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2015, 25, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L.; Di Somma, C.; Laudisio, D.; Salzano, C.; Pugliese, G.; de Alteriis, G.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Sex differences of vitamin D status across BMI classes: An observational prospective cohort study. Nutrients 2019, 11, 3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. WHO|World Health Organization. Body Mass Index—BMI. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  32. Nishida, C.; Ko, G.T.; Kumanyika, S. Body fat distribution and noncommunicable diseases in populations: Overview of the 2008 WHO Expert Consultation on Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Hazen, J.E.; Donahue, L.; Li, X.M.; Hazen, S.L. Measurement of trimethylamine-N-oxide by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 455, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Beale, R.; Airs, R. Quantification of glycine betaine, choline and trimethylamine N-oxide in seawater particulates: Minimisation of seawater associated ion suppression. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 938, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Annunziata, G.; Laudisio, D.; Tenore, G.C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. A new light on vitamin d in obesity: A novel association with trimethylamine-n-oxide (tmao). Nutrients 2019, 11, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Barrea, L.; Annunziata, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Di Somma, C.; Laudisio, D.; Maisto, M.; de Alteriis, G.; Tenore, G.C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) as novel potential biomarker of early predictors of metabolic syndrome. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yu, W.; Xu, C.; Li, G.; Hong, W.; Zhou, Z.; Xiao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Huang, M.; Jin, J. Simultaneous determination of trimethylamine N-oxide, choline, betaine by UPLC-MS/MS in human plasma: An application in acute stroke patients. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 152, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barrea, L.; Tarantino, G.; Somma, C.D.; Muscogiuri, G.; Macchia, P.E.; Falco, A.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Circulating Levels of Sirtuin 4 in Obese Patients: A Novel Association. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 6101254–6101268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L.; Laudisio, D.; Di Somma, C.; Pugliese, G.; Salzano, C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Somatotropic axis and obesity: Is there any role for the Mediterranean diet? Nutrients 2019, 11, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Barrea, L.; Fabbrocini, G.; Annunziata, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Donnarumma, M.; Marasca, C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Role of nutrition and adherence to the mediterranean diet in the multidisciplinary approach of hidradenitis suppurativa: Evaluation of nutritional status and its association with severity of disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Martínez-González, M.A.; García-Arellano, A.; Toledo, E.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Buil-Cosiales, P.; Corella, D.; Covas, M.I.; Schröder, H.; Arós, F.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; et al. A 14-item mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: The PREDIMED trial. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43134–e43144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Di Somma, C.; Tramontano, G.; De Luca, V.; Illario, M.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Association between Mediterranean diet and hand grip strength in older adult women. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Macchia, P.E.; Di Somma, C.; Falco, A.; Savanelli, M.C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Mediterranean diet and phase angle in a sample of adult population: Results of a pilot study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barrea, L.; Arnone, A.; Annunziata, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Laudisio, D.; Salzano, C.; Pugliese, G.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Adherence to the mediterranean diet, dietary patterns and body composition in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Nutrients 2019, 11, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L.; Aprano, S.; Framondi, L.; Di Matteo, R.; Laudisio, D.; Pugliese, G.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A. Chronotype and adherence to the mediterranean diet in obesity: Results from the opera prevention project. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Almoosawi, S.; Vingeliene, S.; Gachon, F.; Voortman, T.; Palla, L.; Johnston, J.D.; Van Dam, R.M.; Darimont, C.; Karagounis, L.G. Chronotype: Implications for Epidemiologic Studies on Chrono-Nutrition and Cardiometabolic Health. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Nobs, S.P.; Tuganbaev, T.; Elinav, E. Microbiome diurnal rhythmicity and its impact on host physiology and disease risk. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20, e47129–e47144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carasso, S.; Fishman, B.; Lask, L.S.; Shochat, T.; Geva-Zatorsky, N.; Tauber, E. Metagenomic analysis reveals the signature of gut microbiota associated with human chronotypes. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Juda, M.; Vetter, C.; Roenneberg, T. Chronotype modulates sleep duration, sleep quality, and social jet lag in shift-workers. J. Biol. Rhythms 2013, 28, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Buxton, O.M.; Cain, S.W.; O’Connor, S.P.; Porter, J.H.; Duffy, J.F.; Wang, W.; Czeisler, C.A.; Shea, S.A. Adverse metabolic consequences in humans of prolonged sleep restriction combined with circadian disruption. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 11, 129ra43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Hittle, B.M.; Gillespie, G.L. Identifying shift worker chronotype: Implications for health. Ind. Health 2018, 56, 512–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Merikanto, I.; Kronholm, E.; Peltonen, M.; Laatikainen, T.; Vartiainen, E.; Partonen, T. Circadian preference links to depression in general adult population. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 188, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sobolewska-Włodarczyk, A.; Włodarczyk, M.; Szemraj, J.; Stec-Michalska, K.; Fichna, J.; Wiśniewska-Jarosińska, M. Circadian rhythm abnormalities—Association with the course of inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol. Rep. 2016, 68, 847–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nojkov, B.; Rubenstein, J.H.; Chey, W.D.; Hoogerwerf, W.A. The impact of rotating shift work on the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in nurses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 105, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Swanepoel, I.; Roberts, A.; Brauns, C.; Chaliha, D.R.; Papa, V.; Palmer, R.D.; Vaccarezza, M. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO): A new attractive target to decrease cardiovascular risk. Postgrad Med. J. 2021, 139839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hulsegge, G.; Picavet, H.S.J.; Van Der Beek, A.J.; Verschuren, W.M.M.; Twisk, J.W.; Proper, K.I. Shift work, chronotype and the risk of cardiometabolic risk factors. Eur. J. Public Health 2019, 29, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, Y.; Sauve, A.A. NAD+ metabolism: Bioenergetics, signaling and manipulation for therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1864, 1787–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Janeiro, M.H.; Ramírez, M.J.; Milagro, F.I.; Martínez, J.A.; Solas, M. Implication of trimethylamine n-oxide (TMAO) in disease: Potential biomarker or new therapeutic target. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Schiattarella, G.G.; Sannino, A.; Toscano, E.; Giugliano, G.; Gargiulo, G.; Franzone, A.; Trimarco, B.; Esposito, G.; Perrino, C. Gut microbe-generated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide as cardiovascular risk biomarker: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 2948–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Kühn, T.; Rohrmann, S.; Sookthai, D.; Johnson, T.; Katzke, V.; Kaaks, R.; Von Eckardstein, A.; Müller, D. Intra-individual variation of plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), betaine and choline over 1 year. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017, 55, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rohrmann, S.; Linseisen, J.; Allenspach, M.; Von Eckardstein, A.; Müller, D. Plasma concentrations of trimethylamine- n-oxide are directly associated with dairy food consumption and low-grade inflammation in a german adult population. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Cho, C.E.; Caudill, M.A. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide: Friend, Foe, or Simply Caught in the Cross-Fire? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Senthong, V.; Li, X.S.; Hudec, T.; Coughlin, J.; Wu, Y.; Levison, B.; Wang, Z.; Hazen, S.L.; Tang, W.H.W. Plasma Trimethylamine N-Oxide, a Gut Microbe–Generated Phosphatidylcholine Metabolite, Is Associated With Atherosclerotic Burden. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 2620–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, W.H.W.; Wang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Levison, B.; Hazen, J.E.; Donahue, L.M.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L. Prognostic value of elevated levels of intestinal microbe-generated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide in patients with heart failure: Refining the gut hypothesis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 1908–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Wang, Z.; Tang, W.H.W.; Buffa, J.A.; Fu, X.; Britt, E.B.; Koeth, R.A.; Levison, B.S.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L. Prognostic value of choline and betaine depends on intestinal microbiota-generated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. García-Conesa, M.T.; Philippou, E.; Pafilas, C.; Massaro, M.; Quarta, S.; Andrade, V.; Jorge, R.; Chervenkov, M.; Ivanova, T.; Dimitrova, D.; et al. Exploring the validity of the 14-item mediterranean diet adherence screener (Medas): A cross-national study in seven european countries around the mediterranean region. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, W.K.; Chen, C.C.; Liu, P.Y.; Panyod, S.; Liao, B.Y.; Chen, P.C.; Kao, H.L.; Kuo, H.C.; Kuo, C.H.; Chiu, T.H.T.; et al. Identification of TMAO-producer phenotype and host-diet-gut dysbiosis by carnitine challenge test in human and germ-free mice. Gut 2019, 68, 1439–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Krüger, R.; Merz, B.; Rist, M.J.; Ferrario, P.G.; Bub, A.; Kulling, S.E.; Watzl, B. Associations of current diet with plasma and urine TMAO in the KarMeN study: Direct and indirect contributions. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 13 01671 g001 550
Figure 1. Circulating TMAO concentrations across chronotype categories. According to the three chronotype categories, circulating TMAO concentrations increased significantly, with the lowest values in the subjects with the morning chronotype category. Differences in the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA test, with the Bonferroni test as post hoc test. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 1. Circulating TMAO concentrations across chronotype categories. According to the three chronotype categories, circulating TMAO concentrations increased significantly, with the lowest values in the subjects with the morning chronotype category. Differences in the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA test, with the Bonferroni test as post hoc test. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.
Nutrients 13 01671 g001
Nutrients 13 01671 g002 550
Figure 2. Partial correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score. Circulating TMAO concentrations were negatively associated with the chronotype score, after adjusting for BMI and MEDAS-derived MD score. Correlations between variables were performed using Pearson r correlation coefficients. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 2. Partial correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score. Circulating TMAO concentrations were negatively associated with the chronotype score, after adjusting for BMI and MEDAS-derived MD score. Correlations between variables were performed using Pearson r correlation coefficients. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.
Nutrients 13 01671 g002
Nutrients 13 01671 g003 550
Figure 3. Association between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score based on restricted cubic spline model in study population. A chronotype score ≥59 demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with knots <59 (neither chronotype) and <41 (evening chronotype).
Figure 3. Association between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score based on restricted cubic spline model in study population. A chronotype score ≥59 demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with knots <59 (neither chronotype) and <41 (evening chronotype).
Nutrients 13 01671 g003
Nutrients 13 01671 g004 550
Figure 4. The possible bidirectional relationship between the evening chronotype and high circulating TMAO concentrations.
Figure 4. The possible bidirectional relationship between the evening chronotype and high circulating TMAO concentrations.
Nutrients 13 01671 g004
Table
Table 1. Lifestyle information, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, MEDAS-derived MD score, and chronotype of study participants.
Table 1. Lifestyle information, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, MEDAS-derived MD score, and chronotype of study participants.
ParametersMean ± SD or n. (%)
n. 247
Lifestyle Habits
Age (years)36.6 ± 11.0
Smoking (yes)86 (34.8%)
Physical activity (yes)97 (39.3%)
Anthropometric measurement
BMI (kg/m2)28.8 ± 9.1
Normal weight145 (58.7%)
Overweight28 (11.3%)
Grade I obesity21 (8.5%)
Grade II obesity15 (6.1%)
Grade III obesity38 (15.4%)
WC (cm)98.6 ± 23.1
WC (cm) males109.7 ± 22.3
WC (cm) females91.1 ± 20.5
Blood pressure
SBP (mmHg)128.4 ± 12.8
DBP (mmHg)80.6 ± 9.1
Metabolic profile
Circulating TMAO concentrations (µM)6.2 ± 3.6
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)91.3 ± 14.5
Triglycerides (mg/dL)117.5 ± 42.6
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)160.6 ± 36.1
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)85.7 ± 40.6
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)51.4 ± 11.3
AST (U/L)27.4 ± 13.9
ALT (U/L)26.9 ± 14.0
γGT (U/L)30.2 ± 16.5
Nutritional parameter
MEDAS-derived MD score8.1 ± 2.7
Low adherence to the MD56 (22.7%)
Average adherence to the MD101 (40.9%)
High adherence to the MD90 (36.4%)
Chronotype
Chronotype score57.5 ± 19.3
Morning Type154 (62.3%)
Neither Type30 (12.2%)
Evening Type63 (25.5%)
Most of the participants were normal weight (58.7%), had an average adherence to the MD (40.9%), and had a morning chronotype type (62.3%). Results were expressed as mean ± SD or number (%). BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet.
Table
Table 2. Circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score in the study population according to sex, lifestyle habits, and BMI/MEDAS categories.
Table 2. Circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score in the study population according to sex, lifestyle habits, and BMI/MEDAS categories.
Parameters Circulating TMAO Concentrations (µM)p-ValueChronotype Scorep-Value
SexMales (n 100, 40.5%)8.4 ± 3.1<0.00146.7 ± 19.2<0.001
Females (n 147, 49.5%)4.8 ± 3.364.8 ± 15.7
SmokingYes (n 86, 34.8%)7.6 ± 3.4<0.00149.9 ± 19.8<0.001
No (n 161, 65.2%)5.5 ± 3.661.5 ± 17.9
Physical activityYes (n 97, 39.3%)4.7 ± 3.2<0.00163.9 ± 16.8<0.001
No (n 150, 60.7%)7.3 ± 3.753.3 ± 19.7
BMINormal weight (n 145, 58.7%)3.7 ± 2.3<0.00169.8 ± 10.4<0.001
Overweight (n 28, 11.3%)8.2 ± 0.748.4 ± 14.4
Grade I obesity (n 21, 8.5%)9.0 ± 0.939.7 ± 12.7
Grade II obesity (n 15, 6.1%)9.9 ± 0.840.6 ± 14.0
Grade III obesity (n 38, 15.4%)11.5 ± 0.933.5 ± 14.3
MEDAS-derived MD scoreLow adherence to the MD (n 56, 22.7%)9.5 ± 2.9<0.00141.9 ± 18.7<0.001
Average adherence to the MD (n 101, 40.9%)6.7 ± 3.156.4 ± 17.6
High adherence to the MD (n 90, 36.4%)3.8 ± 2.768.4 ± 13.8
Both circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score were significantly different in all categories examined (p < 0.001). Differences according to sex and lifestyle habits were analyzed by Student’s unpaired t-test, while the differences among the classes of BMI and MEDAS were evaluated by ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Results were expressed as mean ± SD. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; BMI, body mass index; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet.
Table
Table 3. Sex, age, lifestyle habits, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and nutritional parameter in the study population grouped based on chronotype categories.
Table 3. Sex, age, lifestyle habits, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and nutritional parameter in the study population grouped based on chronotype categories.
ParametersMorning Type
n = 154, 62.3%		Neither Type
n = 30, 12.2%		Evening Type
n = 63, 25.5%		p-Value
Gender
Males (n, %)41, 26.6%12, 40.0%47, 74.6%χ2 = 42.7
p < 0.001
Females (n, %)113, 73.4%18, 60.0%16, 25.4%
Age (years)38.5 ± 11.040.0 ± 11.530.3 ± 8.2<0.001
Smoking
Yes42, 27.3%12, 40.0%32, 49.2%χ2 = 11.3
p = 0.004
No112, 72.7%18, 60.0%31, 50.8%
Physical activity
Yes72, 46.8%10, 33.3%15, 23.8%χ2 = 10.4
p = 0.006
No82, 53.2%20, 66.7%48, 76.2%
Anthropometric measurements
BMI (kg/m2)23.8 ± 4.032.9 ± 7.539.1 ± 9.3<0.001
WC (cm)87.4 ± 14.4109.0 ± 21.3121.1 ± 22.5<0.001
Blood pressure
SBP (mmHg)120.6 ± 10.9127.3 ± 12.5130.9 ± 12.60.013
DBP (mmHg)78.8 ± 7.980.9 ± 9.180.9 ± 9.50.692
Metabolic profile
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)86.1 ± 12.496.5 ± 13.3101.4 ± 13.8<0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)111.4 ± 41.1124.7 ± 33.0129.2 ± 47.40.012
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)151.7 ± 30.5184.7 ± 29.8170.5 ± 43.4<0.001
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)75.6 ± 35.3113.9 ± 33.996.8 ± 46.7<0.001
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)53.8 ± 11.245.9 ± 9.947.5 ± 10.3<0.001
AST (U/L)24.4 ± 10.833.3 ± 17.530.2 ± 17.30.001
ALT (U/L)24.0 ± 13.234.9 ± 16.231.9 ± 12.1<0.001
γGT (U/L)26.1 ± 10.535.1 ± 19.637.7 ± 22.9<0.001
Nutritional parameter
MEDAS-derived MD score9.0 ± 2.47.1 ± 2.56.2 ± 2.4<0.001
Low adherence to the MD15, 9.7%9, 30.0%32, 50.8%χ2 = 44.0, p < 0.001
Average adherence to the MD61, 39.6%16, 53.3%24, 38.1%χ2 = 2.2, p = 0.328
High adherence to the MD78, 50.6%5, 16.7%7, 11.1%χ2= 35.9, p < 0.001
Participants with the morning chronotype followed a healthier lifestyle, had the lowest anthropometric measurements, SBP, and the best metabolic profile compared to the other chronotypes. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences in the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA test, with the Bonferroni test as post hoc test. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet.
Table
Table 4. Correlations between circulating TMAO concentrations with chronotype scores, age, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and MEDAS-derived MD score.
Table 4. Correlations between circulating TMAO concentrations with chronotype scores, age, BMI, WC, blood pressure, metabolic profile, and MEDAS-derived MD score.
ParametersCirculating TMAO
Concentrations
(µM)		Chronotype
Score
rp-Valuerp-Value
Age (years)−0.277<0.0010.361<0.001
Anthropometric measurements
BMI (kg/m2)0.842<0.001−0.746<0.001
WC (cm)0.785<0.001−0.670<0.001
Blood pressure
SBP (mmHg)0.357<0.001−0.2860.003
DBP (mmHg)0.2450.013−0.0420.672
Metabolic profile
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)0.519<0.001−0.439<0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)0.253<0.001−0.1750.006
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)0.264<0.001−0.1330.037
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)0.255<0.001−0.1210.050
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)−0.261<0.0010.1400.028
AST (U/L)0.261<0.001−0.1940.002
ALT (U/L)0.1950.002−0.1370.031
γGT (U/L)0.320<0.001−0.297<0.001
Nutritional parameter
MEDAS-derived MD score−0.632<0.0010.525<0.001
All parameters evaluated in this study were significantly associated with both circulating TMAO concentrations and the chronotype score. Correlations between variables were performed using Pearson r correlation coefficients. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet.
Table
Table 5. Bivariate proportional odds ratio model to assess the association between both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score with sex, lifestyle habits, MEDAS/chronotype categories.
Table 5. Bivariate proportional odds ratio model to assess the association between both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score with sex, lifestyle habits, MEDAS/chronotype categories.
ParametersCirculating TMAO Concentrations (µM)Chronotype Score
ORp-Value95% ICR2ORp-Value95% ICR2
Sex1.37<0.0011.25–1.500.220.95<0.0010.93–0.960.20
Smoking1.18<0.0011.09–1.280.070.97<0.0010.96–0.980.08
Physical activity0.08<0.0010.75–0.870.121.03<0.0011.02–1.050.07
MEDAS categories
Low adherence to the MD1.53<0.0011.34–1.740.230.95<0.0010.93–0.960.17
Average adherence to the MD1.060.0070.98–1.130.010.690.0040.98–1.000.01
High adherence to the MD0.69<0.0010.63–0.760.261.07<0.0011.04–1.090.19
Chronotype
Morning Type0.27<0.0010.18–0.400.59----
Neither Type1.34<0.0011.17–1.530.09----
Evening Type2.31<0.0011.82–2.920.43----
Both circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score were significantly associated with sex, smoking, and physical activity. In particular, the highest circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with the lowest adherence to the MD and the evening chronotype. Likewise, the lowest chronotype score was associated with the lowest adherence to the MD. Bivariate proportional OR model, 95% IC, and R2. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet; OR, odds ratio; IC, Interval Confidence.
Table
Table 6. Linear regression model for the association between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score, adjusting for potential confounders including age, physical activity, smoking, BMI, MEDAS-derived MD score.
Table 6. Linear regression model for the association between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score, adjusting for potential confounders including age, physical activity, smoking, BMI, MEDAS-derived MD score.
ParametersLinear Regression Model
Non-Standardized
Coefficients		Standardized
Coefficients		 Collinearity
Statistics
TSEβtp-Value95% ICToleranceVIF
Chronotype score−0.0900.007−0.479−12.08<0.001−0.11 to −0.080.3932.54
MEDAS-derived MD score−0.1920.043−0.141−4.50<0.001−0.28 to −0.110.6271.60
BMI (kg/m2)0.0980.0250.2473.86<0.0010.05 to 0.150.1516.60
Waist circumference (cm)0.0250.0090.1562.750.0060.01 to 0.040.1945.16
Smoking0.4570.2020.0602.260.0250.06 to 0.860.8831.13
Physical activity−0.3990.198−0.053−2.010.045−0.79 to 0.010.8771.14
Age (years)0.0150.0090.0451.680.094−0.01 to 0.030.8491.18
Using a linear regression model, the chronotype score was strongly associated with circulating TMAO concentrations. TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; BMI, body mass index; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score; MD, Mediterranean diet; SE, standard error; IC, Interval Confidence; VIF, variance inflation factor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Pugliese, G.; Graziadio, C.; Maisto, M.; Pivari, F.; Falco, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Association of the Chronotype Score with Circulating Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Concentrations. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051671

AMA Style

Barrea L, Muscogiuri G, Pugliese G, Graziadio C, Maisto M, Pivari F, Falco A, Tenore GC, Colao A, Savastano S. Association of the Chronotype Score with Circulating Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Concentrations. Nutrients. 2021; 13(5):1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrea, Luigi, Giovanna Muscogiuri, Gabriella Pugliese, Chiara Graziadio, Maria Maisto, Francesca Pivari, Andrea Falco, Gian Carlo Tenore, Annamaria Colao, and Silvia Savastano. 2021. "Association of the Chronotype Score with Circulating Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Concentrations" Nutrients 13, no. 5: 1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop