Next Article in Journal
Investigating Sex Differences in Rates and Correlates of Food Addiction Status in Women and Men with PTSD
Next Article in Special Issue
Microbiota’s Role in Diet-Driven Alterations in Food Intake: Satiety, Energy Balance, and Reward
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Avian Proteins Are Comparable to Soybean Proteins on the Atherosclerosis Development and Fatty Liver Disease in Apoe-Deficient Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review on the Regional Effects of Gastrointestinal Luminal Stimulation on Appetite and Energy Intake: (Pre)clinical Observations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Function of Gastrointestinal Hormones in Obesity—Implications for the Regulation of Energy Intake

Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Gut Peptide Research Lab, University of Leuven, Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(6), 1839; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061839
Submission received: 20 January 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Appetite and Satiety Control-Gut Mechanisms)

Abstract

:
The global burden of obesity and the challenges of prevention prompted researchers to investigate the mechanisms that control food intake. Food ingestion triggers several physiological responses in the digestive system, including the release of gastrointestinal hormones from enteroendocrine cells that are involved in appetite signalling. Disturbed regulation of gut hormone release may affect energy homeostasis and contribute to obesity. In this review, we summarize the changes that occur in the gut hormone balance during the pre- and postprandial state in obesity and the alterations in the diurnal dynamics of their plasma levels. We further discuss how obesity may affect nutrient sensors on enteroendocrine cells that sense the luminal content and provoke alterations in their secretory profile. Gastric bypass surgery elicits one of the most favorable metabolic outcomes in obese patients. We summarize the effect of different strategies to induce weight loss on gut enteroendocrine function. Although the mechanisms underlying obesity are not fully understood, restoring the gut hormone balance in obesity by targeting nutrient sensors or by combination therapy with gut peptide mimetics represents a novel strategy to ameliorate obesity.

1. Introduction

Obesity has increased dramatically over the past decades and reached epidemic proportions in adults and in children worldwide [1]. The rising prevalence and increased risk of developing chronic diseases exemplify the need for further research to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms that are involved in the pathogenesis of obesity. Obesity is defined by the World Health Organization as “abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health” and is classified by a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, which is a simple index of weight-for-height [2]. Obesity reflects a high dietary intake relative to a low energy expenditure, which causes a disturbed energy balance [3]. However, obesity is a multi-factorial disorder and arises from the complex interaction between genetic, environmental, behavioral and psychological factors [4]. Genetic research has led to the recognition of rare monogenic and more common polygenic forms of obesity with different genes, each contributing to the relative risk of developing obesity [5]. This genetic predisposition is associated with genes that control eating behavior and appetite [6,7].

2. Regulation of Energy Homeostasis

The nuclei of the hypothalamus and brain stem play an important role in the regulation of energy homeostasis [8,9]. These central circuits integrate signals from the periphery to coordinate a response to a change in nutritional status. These signals act on two distinct populations in the arcuate nucleus that have projections to second order neuronal signalling pathways, which transform these inputs into behavioral responses to modify food intake and metabolic rate [9]. In general, peripheral signals can be divided into either long or short acting that communicate the energy status to the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus [10]. Long-term peripheral signals relay information about the extent of adipose tissue. These adiposity signals include the satiety hormone leptin, secreted by adipocytes, and insulin secreted by the pancreas. Their plasma levels are proportional to body fat and they can reach their receptors through an incomplete blood brain barrier at the level of the arcuate nucleus [11,12]. Short-term peripheral signals regulate energy homeostasis through the release of a number of peptide hormones that are secreted from enteroendocrine cells (EECs) in response to feeding and fasting [9]. In general, gut hormones are divided into hunger, orexigenic hormones and satiety, anorexigenic hormones. Ghrelin is the main hormone that is released from the stomach in response to fasting and triggers the onset of eating, thus regulating meal frequency [13]. There is also evidence that motilin is a hunger signal in humans through its stimulatory effect on gastric contractions in the fasted state that signal hunger via a cholinergic pathway [14,15]. The other hormones, including cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), peptide YY (PYY) and oxyntomodulin are satiety signals released after a meal and determine meal size [16,17,18]. However, a study in rats showed that non-nutrient driven GLP-1 release was possible prior to a meal after training the rats with time restricted feeding. The rats secreted GLP-1 cephalically in anticipation of a meal [19]. However, cephalic phase secretion in humans elicited by modified sham feeding was not observed for GLP-1 or ghrelin [20].
Brain regions may be activated either directly via the bloodstream or indirectly via activation of their receptors on the vagal nerve [9]. In addition, the vagus nerve induces satiety in response to nutrients through distension. This distention activates mechanoreceptors on intraganglionic laminar endings, which are present throughout the intestine, and contribute to stretch-induced meal termination [21,22]. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, Bai et al. provided a genetic map of vagal afferents innervating the gastrointestinal tract [23]. Food intake was most potently inhibited by vagal afferents that innervate the intestine. Stimulation of these mechanoreceptors activated satiety-promoting pathways in the brainstem to inhibit the hunger-promoting agouti-related protein (AgRP) neurons in the hypothalamus [23]. Furthermore, increasing intestinal volume was sufficient to inhibit food intake and AgRP activation even in the absence of nutrients.
In high-fat diet (HFD) induced obese mice, gastric and jejunal vagal afferents exhibit a reduced response to stretch which may lead to overconsumption of food and maintenance of the obese state [22].

3. Gut Hormones and Enteroendocrine Cell Plasticity

EECs begin as proliferating pluripotent stem cells in the crypt that commit to the secretory EEC lineage upon migration to the villi. EECs represent only 1% of the epithelial cell population [24]. There are several subtypes of EECs that have been classified based on their morphology and hormone production, e.g., P/D1-cells (ghrelin), L-cells (GLP-1, PYY, oxyntomodulin), I-cells (CCK), K-cells (GIP). However, the one cell-one hormone dogma was abandoned when it was shown, using flow cytometry and microarray-based transcriptomics, that some EEC subtypes were bi- or trihormonal and express members of functionally related peptides. It appeared that some EECs contain only 10% of their primary hormone (L-cells), while other EECs, such as the P/D1-cells, express more than 70% of their primary hormone, ghrelin [25,26]. This made the classification more complicated with up to 20 different cell types. These findings were further refined in a mouse single cell transcriptomic study which provided a clear description of the EEC hierarchy and its sub-lineages, identified regulators of lineage specification and showed that EECs display hormonal plasticity in the course of their maturation [27]. Recently, Beumer et al. provided a high-resolution mRNA and secretome atlas of human EECs using an organoid-based platform [28]. Key differences to murine EECs were found with respect to hormones, sensory receptors and transcription factors. For example, although motilin EECs do not exist in mice, in humans they identified a cluster of cells producing motilin and ghrelin with a gradient from predominantly motilin to mainly ghrelin expressing cells [29]. The authors speculated that these might represent different states of the same cell type that can undergo a bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-controlled switch in hormone expression [28]. Another study from this group showed that upon activation of BMP signalling L-cells lose GLP-1 and increase secretin, neurotensin and PYY expression [30]. Therefore, BMP inhibitors have the potential to boost GLP-1 producing cells to improve glycaemic control in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [30].

4. Altered Gut Hormone Levels in Obesity

Obesity is known to affect the expression of many hormones. Defects in the long-acting peripheral signals can be due to mutations in the leptin gene or leptin receptor, and have been observed in a limited number of patients [31]. Leptin deficiency is entirely treatable with daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human leptin. However, the majority of obese patients have high circulating leptin levels and in these patients administration of recombinant leptin failed to decrease body weight and food intake due to leptin resistance [32]. The latter contributes to the maintenance of obesity. Several mechanisms have been identified as potentially underlying leptin resistance, including changes in transport across the blood brain barrier, endoplasmatic reticulum stress and impaired leptin receptor function and STAT3 signalling [33]. A recent study in aged mice even showed that the leptin sensitizer, celastrol, restored sensitivity and induced decreases in fat mass and body weight, but not in young mice [34]. In addition, the vagal afferent pathway plays an important role in signalling of the nutrient content from the gut to the brain through sensing of the gut hormones [35]. De Lartigue et al. found that leptin resistance by the vagal afferent pathway causes hyperphagia, which contributes to the onset of obesity [36]. The sensitivity of gastric vagal afferents that convey satiety signals is decreased in HFD-induced obese mice. In contrast to lean mice, leptin released from gastric epithelial cells further inhibited the response of vagal afferents to mechanical stimuli in HFD-induced obese mice, thereby worsening the situation [37].
Obesity also alters the short-term meal-related signalling of gut hormones. It is tempting to speculate that changes in the gut hormone balance may contribute to hyperphagia in obese patients. Table 1 summarizes the meal-related fluctuations in gut hormone levels and their alterations in obese and T2DM patients.

4.1. Orexigenic Hormones

4.1.1. Ghrelin

Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid peptide that is activated upon octanoylation of serine on the third N-terminal amino acid position, a posttranslational modification initiated by ghrelin O-acyl-transferase (GOAT) [59,60]. Ghrelin binds to the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR1a) on NPY/AgRP neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus to stimulate food intake [61]. However, ghrelin also stimulates many brain regions that are involved in reward and motivation, including the ventral tegmental area and hippocampus [62]. Ghrelin favors hedonic food consumption by enhancing reward signalling [62,63,64].
Ghrelin is secreted from the P/D1 cells during the preprandial state and influences the frequency of meals [13]. Secretion of ghrelin involves the sympathetic nervous system and is mediated via β1 receptors on the ghrelin cell [65,66]. The magnitude of the postprandial fall is dependent on the macronutrient composition of the meal and caloric content [67,68]. Plasma ghrelin levels are lower in obese patients [38,39,40,41,42,43]. This decrease is thought to be compensatory rather than causal and to represent a physiological adaptation to the positive energy balance. The only exception is patients with Prader–Willi syndrome, who are characterized by high ghrelin levels long before the onset of hyperphagia [69]. At an early age, these patients suffer from persistent cravings, which lead to increased food intake and childhood obesity. In addition, these patients not only show endocrine dysfunctions such as growth hormone deficiency hypogonadism, hypothyroidism and several others, but also behavior problems, social/learning disabilities, mental issues and comorbidities [70].
Furthermore, obese patients have almost no postprandial decline in response to food intake, and the lack of meal-related fluctuations may continuously stimulate appetite [39]. There are inconsistent findings on the effect of obesity on the number of ghrelin-positive cells and ghrelin mRNA expression in biopsies [40,71,72]. In resection specimens, region-dependent differences in ghrelin mRNA expression were observed in the stomach of lean versus obese subjects, with higher expression levels in the distal stomach of obese subjects compared to lean [73]. Studies in human primary fundic cultures revealed that obesity decreased the production of ghrelin at the protein level in the cell, resulting in a decreased secretion in the cell supernatant without affecting steady state secretory mechanisms [74]. Altered responsiveness to noradrenaline has been observed in primary crypt cultures from obese subjects, as well as from diet-induced mice, suggesting that a reduced sympathetic drive may contribute to the disturbed ghrelin regulation [74,75].
Studies in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice suggest that the hypothalamic circuitry, which controls food intake, becomes resistant to ghrelin during obesity [76]. Several mechanisms have been suggested, including hyperleptinemia and inflammation in the hypothalamus and nodose ganglion. Recently, it has been hypothesized that high levels of liver-enriched antimicrobial peptide-2, the endogenous ghrelin receptor antagonist produced in the small intestine, prevent acylated ghrelin from activating ghrelin receptors in the arcuate nucleus in obese individuals [77].
Obese patients may potentially only benefit from treatments with GHSR antagonists or treatments that neutralize ghrelin (e.g., GOAT inhibitors) after diet-induced weight loss, which restores ghrelin sensitivity and is accompanied by an increase in plasma ghrelin levels. Nevertheless, low dose infusion of ghrelin still increased ad libitum energy intake at a buffet meal in obese patients [78]. Therefore, the concept of ghrelin resistance remains to be shown in obese patients.

4.1.2. Motilin

Motilin is a 22-amino acid peptide released by the M-cells in the small intestine that stimulates gastrointestinal motility [79]. It is structurally related to ghrelin, which was originally named motilin-related peptide [80]. Plasma motilin levels fluctuate with the phases of the migrating motor complex (MMC), initiating in the distal stomach or small intestine a pattern of strong contractions during the interdigestive phase that clean the intestine of food remnants [81]. More recently, motilin was identified as a key hunger signal in humans. It was shown that motilin-induced gastric phase III contractions during the MMC signal hunger in the fasting state via a cholinergic pathway [14,15].
Deloose et al. reported higher plasma motilin levels with less fluctuations in the fasting state in obese patients [44]. The lack of elevation in plasma motilin levels before the start of gastric phase III contractions was in line with the switch in origin of phase III contractions from the stomach to the duodenum, initially described by Pieramico et al. [82] This may explain the reduced hunger observed in obese patients during phase III that was restored by pharmacological induction of gastric phase III contractions with the motilin receptor agonist, erythromycin [44].

4.2. Anorexigenic Hormones

4.2.1. Cholecystokinin

Cholecystokinin (CCK) is secreted mainly by duodenal and jejunal I-cells in response to feeding, particularly fat and protein [83]. It is posttranslationally processed to yield various truncated circulating forms including CCK-8, CCK-33 and CCK-58, that can bind to the CCK1 receptor or CCK2 receptor to exert its biological effects. CCK inhibits food intake by acting on vagal afferents, especially in the duodenum [84]. Slowing of gastric emptying is another mechanism of CCK-induced appetite suppression [85]. In pharmacological concentrations, CCK also stimulates insulin secretion [86].
It remains controversial whether obesity affects CCK secretion; both a reduction [43,45], an increase [46] and unaltered [47] postprandial CCK levels have been reported in obese subjects. Furthermore, the responses to macronutrients have been variable [47]. Defects in CCK signalling have been reported to contribute to obesity, since genetic mutations in CCK1 receptor result in increased meal size and food intake [87,88].
Obese humans are still sensitive to the satiating action of CCK [89]. However, in humans the efficacy of molecule CCK1 receptor agonists has been variable [90]. Furthermore, these molecules suffer from lack of specificity and have off-target effects. Novel strategies are needed to target CCK1 receptors more effectively and to dissociate disease activity from undesirable effects [91].

4.2.2. Glucagon-Like-Peptide 1

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a proglucagon-derived hormone that is secreted by L-cells in the small intestine and colon in response to nutrients [16]. L-cells are in direct contact with luminal nutrients and GLP-1 levels increase rapidly upon food intake. The low number of L-cells in the proximal intestine probably accounts, at least in part, for the early postprandial rise in GLP-1 levels, but it has been suggested that neuronal and/or humoral mechanisms contribute as well. GLP-1 is a satiety signal that mainly acts via vagal, rather than, central GLP-1 receptors [16,92]. Once GLP-1 is taken up by capillaries, it is rapidly broken down by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP4). This limits the amount of GLP-1 reaching the systemic circulation and hence, its endocrine activities. GLP-1 is an important incretin hormone that stimulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion by binding to GLP-1 receptors on β-cells [93].
A study in a large cohort of obese patients showed a ~20% reduction in GLP-1 response to oral glucose compared with normal weight individuals [48]. However, when comparing GLP-1 secretion during an oral glucose tolerance test or meal-tolerance test in subjects with obesity or T2DM, increased [53], decreased [48,49,50,51,52] or unchanged [54,55,56] GLP-1 responses have been found. In some studies, patients with T2DM were treated with metformin or DPP4 inhibitors, which enhance GLP-1 secretion, and in others insulin resistance was more pronounced, a factor related to impaired GLP-1 release [94]. If the cohorts are not matched closely to the healthy participants, factors such as age, sex and rate of gastric emptying, may all influence the secretion of GLP-1.
Indeed, the pathology of obesity may change according to age and gender, and therefore affect the changes in the levels of the gut hormones. For example, pre-menopausal women may have higher GLP-1 levels relative to their control groups (post-menopausal women and men of the same age), which may provide premenopausal women with relative protection against metabolic diseases and the associated comorbidities [95,96].
Since reduced GLP-1 levels are not representative for all patients, it remains to be further investigated in longitudinal studies whether a decrease in intestinal GLP-1 secretion contributes to obesity in humans. Studies in animal models are also inconsistent with reports of higher GLP-1 levels in diet-induced obese rats than in control rats [97].
Nevertheless, although obesity may affect postprandial GLP-1 secretion, obese patients are still sensitive to systematically administered GLP-1 with consequent reduced hunger ratings and slowed gastric emptying. In fact, GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP4 inhibitors are widely used classes of anti-diabetic and/or anti-obesity agents [98,99].

4.2.3. Peptide YY

PYY is a 36-amidated amino acid peptide that is secreted by L-cells in the distal gut together with GLP-1, GLP-2 and oxyntomodulin following a meal [100]. Proteins provide the most potent stimuli for the release of PYY [57]. Immediately after an oral nutrient load, PYY levels start to rise even before the nutrients reach the distal gut, implying the involvement of a neural reflex pathway [101]. PYY1-36 is cleaved to PYY3-36 by the enzyme DPP4 immediately after secretion. PYY3-36 acts at Y2 receptors in the arcuate nucleus to inhibit food intake [102]. Meal-induced PYY3-36 release tends to be lower in obese than in lean individuals [43,57,58]. Whether peripheral PYY3-36 acts as a satiety signal in rodents remains controversial [102,103]. After the initial report by Batterham et al. that peripheral injection of PYY3-36 inhibited food intake and reduced body weight in mice but not in Y2R-null mice, several other labs (data from 1000 rodents obtained in 12 labs) failed to replicate these findings [103,104]. Stress was suggested to be a confounding factor. Nevertheless, a follow-up report showed the PYY3-36 reduced appetite by 30% in 12 obese and 12 lean volunteers [58].
There are currently two PYY3-36 compounds, PYY 1875 (Novo Nordisk) and GT-001 (Gila Therapeutics) in phase 1 trials for the treatment of obesity.

5. Altered Nutrient Sensing in Obesity

Nutrient-sensing G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), similar to those in the lingual system, are present on epithelial cells in the gut and respond to luminal compounds (nutrients, bile acids, bacterial metabolites, toxins etc.) to induce a variety of biological functions [105,106]. Chemoreceptors on EECs in the gut tune the balance of appetite-regulating hormones in response to a meal. Both in vitro studies (cell lines, mucosal segments and isolated crypts) and in vivo studies (taste receptor knockout mice) have been used to demonstrate a role for taste receptors in gut hormone release [106]. For example, in the stomach protein breakdown products are sensed by the umami receptor (TAS1R1–TAS1R3) and other amino acid sensors (CaSR and GPRC6A) on P/D1-cells, to regulate the release of ghrelin [73,107]. Carbohydrate sensing (TAS1R2-TAS1R3, Na+-glucose cotransporter type 1 (SGLT1)) occurs mainly in L-cells which secrete GLP-1 [108,109]. In addition, bitter taste receptors on EECs may represent an important target to reduce appetite [110].
The nutrient-sensing mechanisms of EECs may be affected by obesity and influence meal-related gut hormone fluctuations. The expression of amino acid sensors and bitter taste receptors in the mucosa of the human stomach and small intestine is affected by obesity in a region-dependent manner [73,74]. Similar findings were reported in HFD induced obese mice [111]. The effect of a casein hydrolysate on ghrelin release was reduced in mucosal segments of the human fundus, whereas the effect of the broadly tuned bitter agonist denatonium benzoate was apparently selectively blunted by obesity in human small intestinal—but not in fundic— segments [73,74]. Nguyen et al. showed that in morbid obesity, proximal intestinal glucose absorption is accelerated and related to increased expression of SGLT1, and may predispose to T2DM [112]. In patients with T2DM the expression of sweet taste receptors has proven to be dysregulated during acute hyperglycemia, and this may contribute to postprandial hyperglycemia [113]. Stewart et al. showed that the sensing of oleic acid by lingual and also intestinal receptors is compromised in obese patients [45]. Furthermore, the increase in plasma CCK levels in response to oleic acid tended to be reduced in the obese population.
A loss of function mutation has been observed in the long chain fatty acid receptor, FFAR4, in obese individuals that increased the risk of obesity and T2DM [114].
Thus, changes in the nutrient sensing mechanisms of EECs have been observed in obesity. The effects are region- and nutrient-specific and may, therefore, also be influenced by the diet of the obese patients. This may contribute to some of the inconsistent findings related to the effect of obesity on meal-related fluctuations in gut hormone levels.

6. Obesity Alters the Circadian Clock and the Diurnal Fluctuations in Gut Hormone Levels

Apart from meal-related fluctuations, gut hormones also show diurnal fluctuations that are regulated by the circadian clock in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus. The most important entrainment signal of the master clock in mammals is the light–dark cycle, which inevitably determines the feeding–fasting cycle, which in turn indirectly entrains peripheral clocks via local zeitgebers such as nutrients and hormones [115]. A mismatch between the intrinsic circadian clock and behavior, as occurs during shift-work, leads to chronodisruption and is associated with several diseases including metabolic syndrome and obesity. A HFD alters the phase and amplitude of clock genes that regulate the circadian rhythm and contributes to chronodisruption [115,116]. In obese patients, the nocturnal rise in plasma ghrelin levels is blunted while the amplitude of the diurnal rhythm in leptin levels is increased [117]. GLP-1 levels peak during the day in humans, but the rhythmicity was also lost in obese patients [118]. These alterations in the dynamics of appetite-regulating hormones in obesity may alter the relationship among complex systems that regulate energy homeostasis. In humans intermittent fasting has gained popularity as a weight loss diet. Food is then only consumed within a consistent time window during the normal feeding period, thereby lengthening the daily fasting period. Enforcing nutrient utilization rhythms during chronodisruption leads to rhythmic activation of clock genes that amplify nutrient response mechanisms [119]. A recent randomized controlled trial in obese patients reported that time-restricted eating during eight weeks reduced body weight, insulin resistance and oxidative stress versus a control group that had no meal timing restrictions [120]. A similar randomized, isocaloric trial (five weeks) in men with prediabetes reported that time-restricted eating improved insulin sensitivity, blood pressure and oxidative stress even without weight loss in men [121]. It remains to be investigated whether intermittent fasting also results in a restoration of the gut hormone balance.

7. Strategies for the Management of Obesity: Role of Gut Hormones

7.1. Diet-Induced Weight Loss

Caloric restriction induces weight loss in obese individuals and restores the preprandial rise in ghrelin plasma levels [41]. Evidence from animal studies suggests that this increase in ghrelin levels may resensitize the brain and overcome ghrelin resistance to induce rebound weight gain [122]. Thus, ghrelin may act as a survival hormone to prevent further weight loss during a negative energy balance.
The effect of caloric restriction on plasma motilin levels has not been studied and has been hampered by the fact that motilin does not exist in rodents [29].
In obese patients, lower postprandial levels of GLP-1 and PYY were observed along with increased appetite scores, following an 8-week low-energy intake diet and a 2–3 week refeeding period [123]. Similarly, reductions in leptin, PYY and CCK were observed following a weight loss program with a very low energy diet which was accompanied by an increase in subjective appetite scores [124,125]. Importantly, one year after initial weight reduction, levels did not revert to levels recorded before weight loss, suggesting that alterations in gut hormone levels may facilitate regain of lost weight [124].
Interest in prebiotic supplementation with oligofructose or inulin for weight management stems from studies in rodents that reported reductions in body weight and altered gut hormone levels [126,127]. Prebiotic fibers are fermented by the gut microbiota to short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that act on enteroendocrine cells via FFAR2 or FFAR3 to affect gut hormone release [106]. In a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial, oligofructose supplementation for 12 weeks reduced body weight in overweight and obese adults [128]. Ghrelin levels were reduced and PYY, but not GLP-1 levels were increased. Targeted delivery of the SCFA propionate to the colon of overweight patients with an inulin-propionate ester reduced energy intake and increased postprandial plasma PYY and GLP-1 levels in overweight patients [129]. Supplementation for 24 weeks reduced weight gain and prevented the deterioration in insulin sensitivity observed in the inulin control group. However, the rise in PYY and GLP-1 levels was not observed in the long-term study, indicating that desensitization may have occurred. A recent randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of modulation of the microbiome with isoenergetic diets that differed in their concentrations of prebiotics. The high-fiber diet selectively promoted a group of SCFA producers as the major active producers. When the SCFA producers were present in greater diversity and abundance, the improvement in haemoglobin A1c levels was greater, possibly reflecting in part increased GLP-1 production [130]. Evidence of crosstalk between the gut microbiome is also derived from studies with administration of Akkermansia muciniphila, known to prevent diet-induced obesity [131]. This commensal bacterium increased levels of 2-acylglycerols, endogenous cannabinoids, known to stimulate GLP-1 levels via GPR119 [132].

7.2. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Restores the Gut Hormone Balance

A Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, where the pouch of the stomach is bypassed to the small intestine, is an effective way of inducing and maintaining weight loss in morbidly obese patients. After RYGB surgery, the contact of nutrients with much of the stomach and duodenum is bypassed, resulting in a rapid delivery of undigested nutrients to the jejunum. This rerouting has been shown to affect the expression of nutrient sensors in the gut that together with other intestinal adaptations, such as changes in morphology and altered bacterial fermentation, contribute to alterations in gut hormone profiles [133,134,135].
Indeed, the reported weight loss with ensuing improvement in glucose homeostasis in patients undergoing RYGB surgery or sleeve gastrectomy is associated with elevated postprandial PYY and GLP-1 levels, even one year after surgery [136,137]. CCK-secreting cells are mainly located in the bypassed duodenum. In two studies, where the effect of RYGB on CCK was investigated, a faster and higher peak response towards a meal was found [137,138]. In addition, there is a possible association between the higher plasma levels of these satiety hormones and the reduced food reward system in patients after a RYGB surgery, these patients exhibit a modified behavioral and brain reward response to food [139,140].
The reported effects of RYGB surgery on plasma ghrelin levels are inconsistent with a decrease, no change or an increase reported [136]. The size of the created pouch and difficulties inherent to the measurement of biological active octanoylated ghrelin levels have contributed to this. It is therefore unlikely that ghrelin is responsible for the post-surgical metabolic improvements. Regarding the other orexigenic hormone, motilin, Deloose et al. reported decreased motilin plasma levels in parallel with hedonic hunger scores after RYGB [44]. Figure 1 summarizes the differences in gut hormone levels in obese individuals before and after RYGB surgery.

7.3. Combination Therapy

GLP-1R agonists are used widely to treat T2DM. Liraglutide, which is administered once a day, was until now the only GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist to be approved for weight management [141]. Recently, Semaglutide, a long acting GLP-1R agonist, has proven to be effective in weight management as an adjunct to lifestyle by inducing 14.9% weight loss from baseline in overweight and obese individuals [142]. Combined agonism, mostly by combining GLP-1 analogues with other food intake-inhibiting and/or glucose-lowering hormones, may cause a synergistic pharmacological action in obese individuals and patients with T2DM. Therefore, combination therapy is currently considered as the way to go to mimic the beneficial effects of RYGB surgery in a non-surgical manner [143]. Table 2 gives an overview of several combinations with GLP-1R analogues that are currently in clinical trial.

7.3.1. GLP-1 and GIP

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone that is secreted by K-cells in response to nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion through activation of GIP receptors on pancreatic beta cells, and acts as a blood glucose stabilising hormone by regulating insulin and glucagon secretion [144,145]. GIP also exerts direct actions on lipid metabolism, promoting lipogenesis and weight gain, and GIPR agonists have been demonstrated to exacerbate the postprandial glucagon excursion in individuals with T2DM [146]. Therefore, GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonists were initially developed to induce weight loss and to control glycaemia levels in obesity and individuals with T2DM [147]. Even though individuals with T2DM have a decreased insulinotropic effect of GIP, due to impaired responsiveness by beta cells, the loss of GIP has been shown to enhance GLP-1R activity [55,148]. Evidence suggests that GIPR agonism can also positively impact body weight. A recent study showed that injection of a peripherally long acting, selective mouse GIPR agonist in DIO mice, lowered body weight due to reduced food intake [149]. Therefore, dual agonism of GLP-1R, which exerts glycaemic control, and GIPR represents a strategy in treating obesity and T2DM. Coadministration of the selective GIP receptor agonist, ZP4165, together with the GLP-1R agonist, liraglutide, in DIO mice resulted in superior body weight loss and improved blood glucose and plasma cholesterol levels [150]. Currently, tirzepatide, a dual-incretin peptide from Eli Lilly, has reached multi-dose clinical trials and shows promise in the treatment of obesity and T2DM [151].

7.3.2. GLP-1 and GCG

The use of glucagon (GCG) with GLP-1 may intuitively appear contradictory since it antagonizes the effect of insulin and increases glucose levels, evoking hyperglycaemia. Nevertheless, glucagon also induces thermogenesis, increases energy expenditure and has hypolipidemic effects, which are beneficial for weight management in obese individuals [152]. Moreover, while chronic GCG stimulation exhibits glucose intolerance, acute GCG agonism at a lower dose, which is not able to evoke hyperglycaemia, enhances glucose tolerance and improves insulin sensitivity [153]. This suggests the use of GLP1-GCG dual agonists in not only obesity, but also in T2DM. Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the body weight and glucose lowering effects of GLP-1R/GCGR agonists. For example, a single high-dose or multiple low-dose injections of a GLP-1R/GCGR dual agonist induced body weight loss which was associated with increased energy expenditure and thermogenesis [154]. However, the effect of GLP-1R/GCGR dual agonists on body weight in human studies has not yet been found as effective as in animal studies. Cotadutide, a novel dual agonist by AstraZeneca, demonstrated superior results in body weight reduction relative to the GLP-1R agonist liraglutide during preclinical studies in DIO mice and normal weight cynomolgus monkeys [155]. Currently, results from Phase II clinical trials with cotadutide demonstrated beneficial effects on blood glucose levels, changes in liver fat and glycogen stores in patients with T2DM [156].
Oxyntomodulin (OXM) is a naturally occurring GLP1R/GCGR dual agonist that is secreted by L-cells after food intake to induce satiety and increase energy expenditure [157]. As native OXM has a very short half-life due to degradation by DPP4 and fast renal clearance, OXM analogues are being developed as a therapeutic candidate to treat obesity and T2DM. Recently, a PEGylated analogue showed a 27.1% body weight reduction at a high dose in DIO mice, which was significantly higher than the weight loss effect with liraglutide [158].

7.3.3. GLP-1 and PYY3-36

The combination of GLP-1 analogue with PYY3-36 mainly has a role in body weight management. Co-infusion of PYY3-36 and GLP-1 reduced energy intake by 30% compared to placebo in overweight men, which was not achieved when a mono-infusion was administered of PYY3-36 or GLP-1 [159]. In addition, co-administration of PYY3-36 with oxyntomodulin reduced energy intake by 42.7% in overweight and obese volunteers, and the effect was more pronounced than when either hormone was infused separately [160]. No drugs are yet in clinical trials for combinations with PYY3-36.

7.3.4. GLP-1, GCG and GIP

The combination of three gut hormones, triagonists, have emerged as new way of inducing multiple metabolic improvements. An acylated GLP-1R/GCGR/GIPR triagonist exerted in vivo and in vitro receptor activity in rodents with superior metabolic effects, improved glycaemic control and body weight loss, relative to their co-agonists [161]. HM15211 (Hanmi Pharmaceuticals) is a triagonist with high GCG activity for obesity treatment and a balanced GLP-1 and GIP activity, to neutralize the hyperglycemic risk of GCG. Preclinical studies with HM15211 have shown improved weight loss, reduced liver fat and possibly inflammation, and may be effective for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as well [162]. HM15211 is currently in phase II clinical trials with a 30% reduction of liver fat in comparison to placebo after a 12-month treatment [163].
Multi-agonists are the next generation of therapies to treat patients with T2DM and obesity. They avoid the adverse effects of surgery (malnutrition, post-prandial hypoglycaemia, bowel obstruction, etc.) and GLP1R agonists (gastrointestinal symptoms). Multi-agonists can therefore be a solution for these individuals as a way to manage body weight.

8. Conclusions

Gut hormones are important players in the regulation of appetite. Obesity has a clear impact on fasted and meal-related fluctuations in gut hormone release but the effect on some hormones remains controversial. The mechanisms involved are complex and multifactorial, relating to changes in the number/content of EECs, effect of age and gender, alterations in nutrients’ sensing mechanisms that regulate postprandial responses, alterations in diurnal fluctuations, and may also involve alterations in the central responsiveness to gut hormones. Further exploration of the crosstalk between the gut microbiome and EECs is of interest. Restoring the disordered gut hormone balance in obesity by targeting nutrient sensors in selective regions of the gut or by combined administration of gut peptide mimetics represent a major potential therapeutic targets to improve the prevention and management of obesity.

Funding

This work was supported by a Methusalem grant from the KU Leuven. The funder of the study had no role in writing of the review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ng, M.; Fleming, T.; Robinson, M.; Thomson, B.; Graetz, N.; Margono, C.; Mullany, E.C.; Biryukov, S.; Abbafati, C.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization. Obesity. Obesity and Overweight. 2020. Available online: who.int (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  3. Spiegelman, B.M.; Flier, J.S. Obesity and the regulation of energy balance. Cell 2001, 104, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Weinsier, R.L.; Hunter, G.R.; Heini, A.F.; Goran, M.I.; Sell, S.M. The etiology of obesity: Relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. Am. J. Med. 1998, 105, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rohde, K.; Keller, M.; Poulsen, L.L.C.; Blüher, M.; Kovacs, P.; Böttcher, Y. Genetics and epigenetics in obesity. Metabolism 2019, 92, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Montague, C.T.; Farooqi, I.S.; Whitehead, J.; Soos, M.A.; Rau, H.; Wareham, N.J.; Sewter, C.P.; Digby, J.E.; Mohammed, S.N.; Hurst, J.A.; et al. Congenital leptin deficiency is associated with severe early-onset obesity in humans. Nature 1997, 387, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cuevas-Sierra, A.; Ramos-Lopez, O.; Riezu-Boj, J.I.; Milagro, F.I.; Martinez, J.A. Diet, gut microbiota, and obesity: Links with host genetics and epigenetics and potential applications. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S17–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Neary, N.M.; Goldstone, A.P.; Bloom, S.R. Appetite regulation: From the gut to the hypothalamus. Clin. Endocrinol. 2004, 60, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Suzuki, K.; Simpson, K.A.; Minnion, J.; Shillito, J.C.; Bloom, S.R. The role of gut hormones and the hypothalamus in appetite regulation. Endocr. J. 2010, 57, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Owyang, C.; Heldsinger, A. Vagal control of satiety and hormonal regulation of appetite. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2011, 17, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Niswender, K.D.; Schwartz, M.W. Insulin and leptin revisited: Adiposity signals with overlapping physiological and intracellular signaling capabilities. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2003, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Quan, W.; Kim, H.-K.; Moon, E.-Y.; Kim, S.S.; Choi, C.S.; Komatsu, M.; Jeong, Y.T.; Lee, M.-K.; Kim, K.-W.; Kim, M.-S.; et al. Role of hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin neuron autophagy in the control of appetite and leptin response. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 1817–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cummings, D.E.; Purnell, J.Q.; Frayo, R.S.; Schmidova, K.; Wisse, B.E.; Weigle, D.S. A preprandial rise in plasma ghrelin levels suggests a role in meal initiation in humans. Diabetes 2001, 50, 1714–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Deloose, E.; Verbeure, W.; Depoortere, I.; Tack, J. Motilin: From gastric motility stimulation to hunger signalling. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tack, J.; Deloose, E.; Ang, D.; Scarpellini, E.; Vanuytsel, T.; Van Oudenhove, L.; Depoortere, I. Motilin-induced gastric contractions signal hunger in man. Gut 2016, 65, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Müller, T.D.; Finan, B.; Bloom, S.R.; D’Alessio, D.; Drucker, D.J.; Flatt, P.R.; Fritsche, A.; Gribble, F.; Grill, H.J.; Habener, J.F.; et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol. Metab. 2019, 30, 72–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rehfeld, J.F. Cholecystokinin-from local gut hormone to ubiquitous messenger. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Manning, S.; Batterham, R.L. The role of gut hormone peptide YY in energy and glucose homeostasis: Twelve years on. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 2014, 76, 585–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vahl, T.P.; Drazen, D.L.; Seeley, R.J.; D’Alessio, D.A.; Woods, S.C. Meal-anticipatory glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in rats. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Veedfald, S.; Plamboeck, A.; Deacon, C.F.; Hartmann, B.; Knop, F.K.; Vilsboll, T.; Holst, J.J. Cephalic phase secretion of insulin and other enteropancreatic hormones in humans. Am. J. Physiol. 2016, 310, G43–G51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Powley, T.L.; Phillips, R.J. Gastric satiation is volumetric, intestinal satiation is nutritive. Physiol. Behav. 2004, 82, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Page, A.J.; Kentish, S.J. Plasticity of gastrointestinal vagal afferent satiety signals. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2017, 29, e12973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bai, L.; Mesgarzadeh, S.; Ramesh, K.S.; Huey, E.L.; Liu, Y.; Gray, L.A.; Aitken, T.J.; Chen, Y.; Beutler, L.; Ahn, J.S.; et al. Genetic identification of vagal sensory neurons that control feeding. Cell 2019, 179, 1129–1143.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Noah, T.K.; Donahue, B.; Shroyer, N.F. Intestinal development and differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2011, 317, 2702–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Egerod, K.L.; Engelstoft, M.S.; Grunddal, K.V.; Nøhr, M.K.; Secher, A.; Sakata, I.; Pedersen, J.; Windeløv, J.A.; Füchtbauer, E.-M.; Olsen, J.; et al. A major lineage of enteroendocrine cells coexpress CCK, secretin, GIP, GLP-1, PYY, and neurotensin but not somatostatin. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 5782–5795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Habib, A.M.; Richards, P.; Cairns, L.S.; Rogers, G.J.; Bannon, C.A.; Parker, H.E.; Morley, T.C.; Yeo, G.S.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Overlap of endocrine hormone expression in the mouse intestine revealed by transcriptional profiling and flow cytometry. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 3054–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gehart, H.; van Es, J.H.; Hamer, K.; Beumer, J.; Kretzschmar, K.; Dekkers, J.F.; Rios, A.; Clevers, H. Identification of enteroendocrine regulators by real-time single-cell differentiation mapping. Cell 2019, 176, 1158–1173.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Beumer, J.; Puschhof, J.; Martinez, J.B.; Martínez-Silgado, A.; Elmentaite, R.; James, K.R.; Ross, A.; Hendriks, D.; Artegiani, B.; Busslinger, G.A.; et al. High-resolution mRNA and secretome atlas of human enteroendocrine cells. Cell 2020, 182, 1062–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, J.; Irwin, D.M.; Chen, R.; Zhang, Y.-P. Stepwise loss of motilin and its specific receptor genes in rodents. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 44, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Beumer, J.; Artegiani, B.; Post, Y.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.; Nguyen, T.N.; Zeng, H.; Van den Born, M.; Van Es, J.H.; Clevers, H. Enteroendocrine cells switch hormone expression along the crypt-to-villus BMP signalling gradient. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Farooqi, I.S.; O’Rahilly, S. 20 years of leptin: Human disorders of leptin action. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 223, T63–T70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Heymsfield, S.B.; Greenberg, A.S.; Fujioka, K.; Dixon, R.M.; Kushner, R.; Hunt, T.; Lubina, J.A.; Patane, J.; Self, B.; Hunt, P.; et al. Recombinant leptin for weight loss in obese and lean adults: A randomized, controlled, dose-escalation trial. JAMA 1999, 282, 1568–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ye, Z.; Liu, G.; Guo, J.; Su, Z. Hypothalamic endoplasmic reticulum stress as a key mediator of obesity-induced leptin resistance. Obes. Rev. 2018, 19, 770–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chellappa, K.; Perron, I.J.; Naidoo, N.; Baur, J.A. The leptin sensitizer celastrol reduces age-associated obesity and modulates behavioral rhythms. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. De Lartigue, G.; Diepenbroek, C. Novel developments in vagal afferent nutrient sensing and its role in energy homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2016, 31, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. De Lartigue, G.; Ronveaux, C.C.; Raybould, H.E. Deletion of leptin signaling in vagal afferent neurons results in hyperphagia and obesity. Mol. Metab. 2014, 3, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kentish, S.J.; O’Donnell, T.A.; Isaacs, N.J.; Young, R.L.; Li, H.; Harrington, A.; Brierley, S.M.; Wittert, G.; Blackshaw, L.A.; Page, A.J. Gastric vagal afferent modulation by leptin is influenced by food intake status. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 1921–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tschöp, M.; Weyer, C.; Tataranni, P.A.; Devanarayan, V.; Ravussin, E.; Heiman, M.L. Circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in human obesity. Diabetes 2001, 50, 707–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. English, P.J.; Ghatei, M.A.; Malik, I.A.; Wilding, J.P. Food fails to suppress ghrelin levels in obese humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dadan, J.; Hady, H.R.; Zbucki, R.L.; Iwacewicz, P.; Bossowski, A.; Kasacka, I. The activity of gastric ghrelin positive cells in obese patients treated surgically. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2009, 47, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cummings, D.E.; Weigle, D.S.; Frayo, R.S.; Breen, P.A.; Ma, M.K.; Dellinger, E.P.; Purnell, J.Q. Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shiiya, T.; Nakazato, M.; Mizuta, M.; Date, Y.; Mondal, M.S.; Tanaka, M.; Nozoe, S.; Hosoda, H.; Kangawa, K.; Matsukura, S. Plasma ghrelin levels in lean and obese humans and the effect of glucose on ghrelin secretion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zwirska-Korczala, K.; Konturek, S.J.; Sodowski, M.; Wylezol, M.; Kuka, D.; Sowa, P.; Adamczyk-Sowa, M.; Kukla, M.; Berdowska, A.; Rehfeld, J.F.; et al. Basal and postprandial plasma levels of PYY, ghrelin, cholecystokinin, gastrin and insulin in women with moderate and morbid obesity and metabolic syndrome. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2007, 58 (Suppl. 1), 13–35. [Google Scholar]
  44. Deloose, E.; Janssen, P.; Lannoo, M.; Van Der Schueren, B.; Depoortere, I.; Tack, J. Higher plasma motilin levels in obese patients decrease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and regulate hunger. Gut 2016, 65, 1110–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stewart, J.E.; Seimon, R.V.; Otto, B.; Keast, R.S.; Clifton, P.M.; Feinle-Bisset, C. Marked differences in gustatory and gastrointestinal sensitivity to oleic acid between lean and obese men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. French, S.J.; Murray, B.; Rumsey, R.D.; Sepple, C.P.; Read, N.W. Preliminary studies on the gastrointestinal responses to fatty meals in obese people. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1993, 17, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Brennan, I.M.; Luscombe-Marsh, N.D.; Seimon, R.V.; Otto, B.; Horowitz, M.; Wishart, J.M.; Feinle-Bisset, C. Effects of fat, protein, and carbohydrate and protein load on appetite, plasma cholecystokinin, peptide YY, and ghrelin, and energy intake in lean and obese men. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012, 303, G129–G140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Faerch, K.; Torekov, S.; Vistisen, D.; Johansen, N.B.; Witte, D.R.; Jonsson, A.; Pedersen, O.; Hansen, T.; Lauritzen, T.; Sandbaek, A.; et al. GLP-1 response to oral glucose is reduced in prediabetes, screen-detected type 2 diabetes, and obesity and influenced by sex: The addition-pro study. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2513–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ranganath, L.R.; Beety, J.M.; Morgan, L.M.; Wright, J.W.; Howland, R.; Marks, V. Attenuated GLP-1 secretion in obesity: Cause or consequence? Gut 1996, 38, 916–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Vilsbøll, T.; Krarup, T.; Deacon, C.F.; Madsbad, S.; Holst, J.J. Reduced postprandial concentrations of intact biologically active glucagon-like peptide 1 in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2001, 50, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Verdich, C.; Toubro, S.; Buemann, B.; Madsen, J.L.; Holst, J.J.; Astrup, A. The role of postprandial releases of insulin and incretin hormones in meal-induced satiety--effect of obesity and weight reduction. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2001, 25, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Toft-Nielsen, M.B.; Damholt, M.B.; Madsbad, S.; Hilsted, L.M.; Hughes, T.E.; Michelsen, B.K.; Holst, J.J. Determinants of the impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 3717–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fukase, N.; Manaka, H.; Sugiyama, K.; Takahashi, H.; Igarashi, M.; Daimon, M.; Yamatani, K.; Tominaga, M.; Sasaki, H. Response of truncated glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide to glucose ingestion in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Effect of sulfonylurea therapy. Acta Diabetol. 1995, 32, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, S.; Yabe, D.; Nohtomi, K.; Takada, M.; Morita, R.; Seino, Y.; Hirano, T. Intact glucagon-like peptide-1 levels are not decreased in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr. J. 2010, 57, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nauck, M.A.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Orskov, C.; Holst, J.J.; Ebert, R.; Creutzfeldt, W. Preserved incretin activity of glucagon-like peptide 1 [7–36 amide] but not of synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 91, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Vollmer, K.; Holst, J.J.; Baller, B.; Ellrichmann, M.; Nauck, M.A.; Schmidt, W.E.; Meier, J.J. Predictors of incretin concentrations in subjects with normal, impaired, and diabetic glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2008, 57, 678–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Batterham, R.L.; Heffron, H.; Kapoor, S.; Chivers, J.E.; Chandarana, K.; Herzog, H.; le Roux, C.W.; Thomas, E.L.; Bell, J.D.; Withers, D.J. Critical role for peptide YY in protein-mediated satiation and body-weight regulation. Cell Metab. 2006, 4, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Batterham, R.L.; Cohen, M.A.; Ellis, S.M.; Le Roux, C.W.; Withers, D.J.; Frost, G.S.; Ghatei, M.A.; Bloom, S.R. Inhibition of food intake in obese subjects by peptide YY3-36. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gutierrez, J.A.; Solenberg, P.J.; Perkins, D.R.; Willency, J.A.; Knierman, M.D.; Jin, Z.; Witcher, D.R.; Luo, S.; Onyia, J.E.; Hale, J.E. Ghrelin octanoylation mediated by an orphan lipid transferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6320–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 1999, 402, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nakazato, M.; Murakami, N.; Date, Y.; Kojima, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K.; Matsukura, S. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature 2001, 409, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Diano, S.; A Farr, S.; Benoit, S.C.; McNay, E.C.; Da Silva, I.; Horvath, B.; Gaskin, F.S.; Nonaka, N.; Jaeger, L.B.; A Banks, W.; et al. Ghrelin controls hippocampal spine synapse density and memory performance. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Abizaid, A.; Liu, Z.-W.; Andrews, Z.B.; Shanabrough, M.; Borok, E.; Elsworth, J.D.; Roth, R.H.; Sleeman, M.W.; Picciotto, M.R.; Tschöp, M.H.; et al. Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 3229–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Malik, S.; McGlone, F.; Bedrossian, D.; Dagher, A. Ghrelin modulates brain activity in areas that control appetitive behavior. Cell Metab. 2008, 7, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhao, T.-J.; Sakata, I.; Li, R.L.; Liang, G.; Richardson, J.A.; Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L.; Zigman, J.M. Ghrelin secretion stimulated by {beta}1-adrenergic receptors in cultured ghrelinoma cells and in fasted mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15868–15873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Mani, B.K.; Osborne-Lawrence, S.; Vijayaraghavan, P.; Hepler, C.; Zigman, J.M. β1-Adrenergic receptor deficiency in ghrelin-expressing cells causes hypoglycemia in susceptible individuals. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3467–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Foster-Schubert, K.E.; Overduin, J.; Prudom, C.E.; Liu, J.; Callahan, H.S.; Gaylinn, B.D.; Thorner, M.O.; Cummings, D.E. Acyl and total ghrelin are suppressed strongly by ingested proteins, weakly by lipids, and biphasically by carbohydrates. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 1971–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Callahan, H.S.; Cummings, D.E.; Pepe, M.S.; Breen, P.A.; Matthys, C.C.; Weigle, D.S. Postprandial suppression of plasma ghrelin level is proportional to ingested caloric load but does not predict intermeal interval in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 1319–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Kweh, F.A.; Miller, J.L.; Sulsona, C.R.; Wasserfall, C.; Atkinson, M.; Shuster, J.J.; Goldstone, A.P.; Driscoll, D.J. Hyperghrelinemia in Prader-Willi syndrome begins in early infancy long before the onset of hyperphagia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2015, 167A, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Cassidy, S.B.; Schwartz, S.; Miller, J.L.; Driscoll, D.J. Prader-Willi syndrome. Genet. Med. 2012, 14, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Widmayer, P.; Küper, M.; Kramer, M.; Königsrainer, A.; Breer, H. Altered expression of gustatory-signaling elements in gastric tissue of morbidly obese patients. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Ritze, Y.; Schollenberger, A.; Sinno, M.H.; Bühler, N.; Böhle, M.; Bárdos, G.; Sauer, H.; Mack, I.; Enck, P.; Zipfel, S.; et al. Gastric ghrelin, GOAT, leptin, and leptinR expression as well as peripheral serotonin are dysregulated in humans with obesity. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2016, 28, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Vancleef, L.; Thijs, T.; Baert, F.; Ceulemans, L.J.; Canovai, E.; Wang, Q.; Steensels, S.; Segers, A.; Farré, R.; Pirenne, J.; et al. Obesity impairs oligopeptide/amino acid-induced ghrelin release and smooth muscle contractions in the human proximal stomach. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Q.; Liszt, K.I.; Deloose, E.; Canovai, E.; Thijs, T.; Farré, R.; Ceulemans, L.; Lannoo, M.; Tack, J.; Depoortere, I. Obesity alters adrenergic and chemosensory signaling pathways that regulate ghrelin secretion in the human gut. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 4907–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Uchida, A.; Zechner, J.F.; Mani, B.K.; Park, W.-M.; Aguirre, V.; Zigman, J.M. Altered ghrelin secretion in mice in response to diet-induced obesity and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Mol. Metab. 2014, 3, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zigman, J.M.; Bouret, S.G.; Andrews, Z.B. Obesity impairs the action of the neuroendocrine ghrelin system. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 27, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mani, B.K.; Puzziferri, N.; He, Z.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Osborne-Lawrence, S.; Metzger, N.P.; Chhina, N.; Gaylinn, B.; Thorner, M.O.; Thomas, E.L.; et al. LEAP2 changes with body mass and food intake in humans and mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 3909–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Druce, M.R.; Wren, A.M.; Park, A.J.; Milton, J.E.; Patterson, M.; Frost, G.; Ghatei, M.A.; Small, C.; Bloom, S.R. Ghrelin increases food intake in obese as well as lean subjects. Int. J. Obes. 2005, 29, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Brown, J.C.; Cook, M.A.; Dryburgh, J.R. Motilin, a gastric motor activity-stimulating polypeptide: Final purification, amino acid composition, and C-terminal residues. Gastroenterology 1972, 62, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tomasetto, C.; Wendling, C.; Rio, M.-C.; Poitras, P. Identification of cDNA encoding motilin related peptide/ghrelin precursor from dog fundus. Peptides 2001, 22, 2055–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Deloose, E.; Janssen, P.; Depoortere, I.; Tack, J. The migrating motor complex: Control mechanisms and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 9, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pieramico, O.; Malfertheiner, P.; Nelson, D.K.; Glasbrenner, B.; Ditschuneit, H. Interdigestive gastroduodenal motility and cycling of putative regulatory hormones in severe obesity. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1992, 27, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Koop, I.; Schindler, M.; Bosshammer, A.; Scheibner, J.; Stange, E.; Koop, H. Physiological control of cholecystokinin release and pancreatic enzyme secretion by intraduodenal bile acids. Gut 1996, 39, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Rogers, R.C.; Hermann, G.E. Mechanisms of action of CCK to activate central vagal afferent terminals. Peptides 2008, 29, 1716–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Fried, M.; Erlacher, U.; Schwizer, W.; Löchner, C.; Koerfer, J.; Beglinger, C.; Jansen, J.B.; Lamers, C.B.; Harder, F.; Bischof-Delaloye, A.; et al. Role of cholecystokinin in the regulation of gastric emptying and pancreatic enzyme secretion in humans. Studies with the cholecystokinin-receptor antagonist loxiglumide. Gastroenterology 1991, 101, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ahrén, B.; Holst, J.J.; Efendic, S. Antidiabetogenic action of cholecystokinin-8 in type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. De Krom, M.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Hendriks, J.; Ophoff, R.A.; van Gils, C.H.; Stolk, R.P.; Grobbee, D.E.; Adan, R. Common genetic variations in CCK, leptin, and leptin receptor genes are associated with specific human eating patterns. Diabetes 2007, 56, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Marchal-Victorion, S.; Vionnet, N.; Escrieut, C.; Dematos, F.; Dina, C.; Dufresne, M.; Vaysse, N.; Pradayrol, L.; Froguel, P.; Fourmy, D. Genetic, pharmacological and functional analysis of cholecystokinin-1 and cholecystokinin-2 receptor polymorphism in type 2 diabetes and obese patients. Pharmacogenetics 2002, 12, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lieverse, R.J.; Jansen, J.B.; A Masclee, A.; Lamers, C.B. Satiety effects of a physiological dose of cholecystokinin in humans. Gut 1995, 36, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Jordan, J.; Greenway, F.; Leiter, L.; Li, Z.; Jacobson, P.; Murphy, K.; Hill, J.; Kler, L.; Aftring, R. Stimulation of cholecystokinin—A receptors with GI181771X does not cause weight loss in overweight or obese patients. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 83, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Miller, L.J.; Desai, A.J. Metabolic actions of the type 1 cholecystokinin receptor: Its potential as a therapeutic target. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 27, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Krieger, J.P. Intestinal glucagon-like peptide-1 effects on food intake: Physiological relevance and emerging mechanisms. Peptides 2020, 131, 170342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Seino, Y.; Fukushima, M.; Yabe, D. GIP and GLP-1, the two incretin hormones: Similarities and differences. J. Diabetes Investig. 2010, 1, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Migoya, E.M.; Bergeron, R.; Miller, J.L.; Snyder, R.N.K.; Tanen, M.; Hilliard, D.; Weiss, B.; Larson, P.; Gutiérrez, M.; Jiang, G.; et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors administered in combination with metformin result in an additive increase in the plasma concentration of active GLP-1. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 88, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Santos-Marcos, J.A.; Rangel-Zuñiga, O.A.; Jimenez-Lucena, R.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Garcia-Carpintero, S.; Malagon, M.M.; Landa, B.B.; Tena-Sempere, M.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; et al. Influence of gender and menopausal status on gut microbiota. Maturitas 2018, 116, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Vaag, A.A.; Holst, J.J.; Vølund, A.; Beck-Nielsen, H. Gut incretin hormones in identical twins discordant for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)—evidence for decreased glucagon-like peptide 1 secretion during oral glucose ingestion in NIDDM twins. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1996, 135, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hira, T.; Pinyo, J.; Hara, H. What is GLP-1 really doing in obesity? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 31, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Nauck, M.A.; Meier, J.J. Management of endocrine disease: Are all GLP-1 agonists equal in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 181, R211–R234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ahrén, B. DPP-4 Inhibition and the path to clinical proof. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Tatemoto, K. Isolation and characterization of peptide YY (PYY), a candidate gut hormone that inhibits pancreatic exocrine secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 2514–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Gibbons, C.; Caudwell, P.; Finlayson, G.; Webb, D.-L.; Hellström, P.M.; Näslund, E.; Blundell, J.E. Comparison of postprandial profiles of ghrelin, active GLP-1, and total PYY to meals varying in fat and carbohydrate and their association with hunger and the phases of satiety. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E847–E855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Batterham, R.L.; Cowley, M.A.; Small, C.J.; Herzog, H.; Cohen, M.A.; Dakin, C.L.; Wren, A.M.; Brynes, A.E.; Low, M.J.; Ghatei, M.A.; et al. Gut hormone PYY (3-36) physiologically inhibits food intake. Nature 2002, 418, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tschöp, M.; Castaneda, T.R.; Joost, H.G.; Thöne-Reineke, C.; Ortmann, S.; Klaus, S.; Hagan, M.M.; Chandler, P.C.; Oswald, K.D.; Benoit, S.C.; et al. Physiology: Does gut hormone PYY3-36 decrease food intake in rodents? Nature 2004, 430, 165, p. 1 following 165, discussion p. 2, following 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gura, T. Obesity research. Labs fail to reproduce protein’s appetite-suppressing effects. Science 2004, 305, 158–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lee, S.J.; Depoortere, I.; Hatt, H. Therapeutic potential of ectopic olfactory and taste receptors. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2019, 18, 116–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Steensels, S.; Depoortere, I. Chemoreceptors in the Gut. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 2018, 80, 117–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vancleef, L.; Broeck, T.V.D.; Thijs, T.; Steensels, S.; Briand, L.; Tack, J.; Depoortere, I. Chemosensory signalling pathways involved in sensing of amino acids by the ghrelin cell. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Jang, H.-J.; Kokrashvili, Z.; Theodorakis, M.J.; Carlson, O.D.; Kim, B.-J.; Zhou, J.; Kim, H.H.; Xu, X.; Chan, S.L.; Juhaszova, M.; et al. Gut-expressed gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15069–15074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Gorboulev, V.; Sch\ufcrmann, A.; Vallon, V.; Kipp, H.; Jaschke, A.; Klessen, D.; Friedrich, A.; Scherneck, S.; Rieg, T.; Cunard, R.; et al. Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 is pivotal for intestinal glucose absorption and glucose-dependent incretin secretion. Diabetes 2012, 61, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Wang, Q.; Liszt, K.I.; Depoortere, I. Extra-oral bitter taste receptors: New targets against obesity? Peptides 2020, 127, 170284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Nunez-Salces, M.; Li, H.; Feinle-Bisset, C.; Young, R.L.; Page, A.J. The regulation of gastric ghrelin secretion. Acta Physiol. 2020, 231, e13588. [Google Scholar]
  112. Nguyen, N.Q.; Debreceni, T.L.; Bambrick, J.E.; Chia, B.; Wishart, J.; Deane, A.M.; Rayner, C.K.; Horowitz, M.; Young, R.L. Accelerated intestinal glucose absorption in morbidly obese humans: Relationship to glucose transporters, incretin hormones, and glycemia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Young, R.L.; Chia, B.; Isaacs, N.J.; Ma, J.; Khoo, J.; Wu, T.; Horowitz, M.; Rayner, C.K. Disordered control of intestinal sweet taste receptor expression and glucose absorption in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 3532–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Ichimura, A.; Hirasawa, A.; Poulain-Godefroy, O.; Bonnefond, A.; Hara, T.; Yengo, L.; Kimura, I.; Leloire, A.; Liu, N.; Iida, K.; et al. Dysfunction of lipid sensor GPR120 leads to obesity in both mouse and human. Nature 2012, 483, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Segers, A.; Depoortere, I. Circadian clocks in the digestive system. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 239–251. [Google Scholar]
  116. Laermans, J.; Depoortere, I. Chronobesity: Role of the circadian system in the obesity epidemic. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 108–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yildiz, B.O.; Suchard, M.A.; Wong, M.-L.; McCann, S.M.; Licinio, J. Alterations in the dynamics of circulating ghrelin, adiponectin, and leptin in human obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10434–10439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Galindo Muñoz, J.S.; Jiménez Rodríguez, D.; Hernández Morante, J.J. Diurnal rhythms of plasma GLP-1 levels in normal and overweight/obese subjects: Lack of effect of weight loss. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 71, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chaix, A.; Manoogian, E.N.; Melkani, G.C.; Panda, S. Time-restricted eating to prevent and manage chronic metabolic diseases. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2019, 39, 291–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Cienfuegos, S.; Gabel, K.; Kalam, F.; Ezpeleta, M.; Wiseman, E.; Pavlou, V.; Lin, S.; Oliveira, M.L.; Varady, K.A. Effects of 4- and 6-h time-restricted feeding on weight and cardiometabolic health: A randomized controlled trial in adults with obesity. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 366–378.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sutton, E.F.; Beyl, R.; Early, K.S.; Cefalu, W.T.; Ravussin, E.; Peterson, C.M. Early time-restricted feeding improves insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and oxidative stress even without weight loss in men with prediabetes. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 1212–1221.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Briggs, D.I.; Lockie, S.H.; Wu, Q.; Lemus, M.B.; Stark, R.; Andrews, Z.B. Calorie-restricted weight loss reverses high-fat diet-induced ghrelin resistance, which contributes to rebound weight gain in a ghrelin-dependent manner. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Sloth, B.; Due, A.; Larsen, T.M.; Holst, J.J.; Heding, A.; Astrup, A. The effect of a high-MUFA, low-glycaemic index diet and a low-fat diet on appetite and glucose metabolism during a 6-month weight maintenance period. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 1846–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sumithran, P.; Prendergast, L.A.; Delbridge, E.; Purcell, K.; Shulkes, A.; Kriketos, A.; Proietto, J. Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1597–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Chearskul, S.; Delbridge, E.; Shulkes, A.; Proietto, J.; Kriketos, A. Effect of weight loss and ketosis on postprandial cholecystokinin and free fatty acid concentrations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1238–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Rastelli, M.; Cani, P.D.; Knauf, C. The gut microbiome influences host endocrine functions. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1271–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Steensels, S.; Cools, L.; Avau, B.; Vancleef, L.; Farré, R.; Verbeke, K.; Depoortere, I. Supplementation of oligofructose, but not sucralose, decreases high-fat diet induced body weight gain in mice independent of gustducin-mediated gut hormone release. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Parnell, J.A.; Reimer, R.A. Weight loss during oligofructose supplementation is associated with decreased ghrelin and increased peptide YY in overweight and obese adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Chambers, E.S.; Viardot, A.; Psichas, A.; Morrison, D.J.; Murphy, K.G.; Zac-Varghese, S.E.K.; MacDougall, K.; Preston, T.; Tedford, C.; Finlayson, G.S.; et al. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut 2015, 64, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Zhao, L.; Zhang, F.; Ding, X.; Wu, G.; Lam, Y.Y.; Wang, X.; Fu, H.; Xue, X.; Lu, C.; Ma, J.; et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science 2018, 359, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Plovier, H.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Depommier, C.; Van Hul, M.; Geurts, L.; Chilloux, J.; Ottman, N.; Duparc, T.; Lichtenstein, L.; et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Ekberg, J.H.; Hauge, M.; Kristensen, L.V.; Madsen, A.N.; Engelstoft, M.S.; Husted, A.-S.; Sichlau, R.; Egerod, K.L.; Timshel, P.; Kowalski, T.J.; et al. GPR119, a Major enteroendocrine sensor of dietary triglyceride metabolites coacting in synergy with FFA1 (GPR40). Endocrinology 2016, 157, 4561–4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Steensels, S.; Lannoo, M.; Avau, B.; Laermans, J.; Vancleef, L.; Farré, R.; Verbeke, K.; Depoortere, I. The role of nutrient sensing in the metabolic changes after gastric bypass surgery. J. Endocrinol. 2017, 232, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Seeley, R.J.; Berridge, K.C. The hunger games. Cell 2015, 160, 805–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Peiris, M.; Aktar, R.; Raynel, S.; Hao, Z.; Mumphrey, M.B.; Berthoud, H.-R.; Blackshaw, L.A. Effects of obesity and gastric bypass surgery on nutrient sensors, endocrine cells, and mucosal innervation of the mouse colon. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Moffett, R.C.; Docherty, N.G.; le Roux, C.W. The altered enteroendocrine reportoire following roux-en-Y-gastric bypass as an effector of weight loss and improved glycaemic control. Appetite 2021, 156, 104807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Peterli, R.; E Steinert, R.; Woelnerhanssen, B.; Peters, T.; Christoffel-Courtin, C.; Gass, M.; Kern, B.; Von Fluee, M.; Beglinger, C. Metabolic and hormonal changes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized, prospective trial. Obes. Surg. 2012, 22, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Foschi, D.; Corsi, F.; Pisoni, L.; Vago, T.; Bevilacqua, M.; Asti, E.; Righi, I.; Trabucchi, E. Plasma cholecystokinin levels after vertical banded gastroplasty: Effects of an acidified meal. Obes. Surg. 2004, 14, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Goldstone, A.P.; Miras, A.; Scholtz, S.; Jackson, S.; Neff, K.J.; Pénicaud, L.; Geoghegan, J.; Chhina, N.; Durighel, G.; Bell, J.D.; et al. Link between increased satiety gut hormones and reduced food reward after gastric bypass surgery for obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Orellana, E.R.; Covasa, M.; Hajnal, A. Neuro-hormonal mechanisms underlying changes in reward related behaviors following weight loss surgery: Potential pharmacological targets. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 164, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Nauck, M.A.; Quast, D.R.; Wefers, J.; Meier, J.J. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes—State-of-the-art. Mol. Metab. 2021, 46, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wilding, J.P.; Batterham, R.L.; Calanna, S.; Davies, M.; Van Gaal, L.F.; Lingvay, I.; McGowan, B.M.; Rosenstock, J.; Tran, M.T.; Wadden, T.A.; et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Brandt, S.J.; Müller, T.D.; DiMarchi, R.D.; Tschöp, M.H.; Stemmer, K. Peptide-based multi-agonists: A new paradigm in metabolic pharmacology. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 284, 581–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Christensen, M.B.; Calanna, S.; Holst, J.J.; Vilsbøll, T.; Knop, F.K. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: Blood glucose stabilizing effects in patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E418–E426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Christensen, M.B. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: Effects on insulin and glucagon secretion in humans. Dan. Med. J. 2016, 63, 63. [Google Scholar]
  146. Chia, C.W.; Carlson, O.D.; Kim, W.; Shin, Y.K.; Charles, C.P.; Kim, H.S.; Melvin, D.L.; Egan, J.M. Exogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide worsens post prandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1342–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Campbell, J.E. Targeting the GIPR for obesity: To agonize or antagonize? Potential mechanisms. Mol. Metab. 2021, 46, 101139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Calanna, S.; Christensen, M.; Holst, J.J.; Laferrère, B.; Gluud, L.L.; Vilsbøll, T.; Knop, F.K. Secretion of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in patients with type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 3346–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Mroz, P.A.; Finan, B.; Gelfanov, V.; Yang, B.; Tschöp, M.H.; DiMarchi, R.D.; Perez-Tilve, D. Optimized GIP analogs promote body weight lowering in mice through GIPR agonism not antagonism. Mol. Metab. 2019, 20, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nørregaard, P.K.; Deryabina, M.A.; Tofteng Shelton, P.; Fog, J.U.; Daugaard, J.R.; Eriksson, P.O.; Larsen, L.F.; Jessen, L. A novel GIP analogue, ZP4165, enhances glucagon-like peptide-1-induced body weight loss and improves glycaemic control in rodents. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hartman, M.L.; Sanyal, A.J.; Loomba, R.; Wilson, J.M.; Nikooienejad, A.; Bray, R.; Karanikas, C.A.; Duffin, K.L.; Robins, D.A.; Haupt, A. Effects of novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide on biomarkers of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Kleinert, M.; Sachs, S.; Habegger, K.M.; Hofmann, S.M.; Müller, T.D. Glucagon regulation of energy expenditure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Kim, T.; Holleman, C.L.; Nason, S.; Arble, D.M.; Ottaway, N.; Chabenne, J.; Loyd, C.; Kim, J.-A.; Sandoval, D.; Drucker, D.J.; et al. Hepatic glucagon receptor signaling enhances insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in rodents. Diabetes 2018, 67, 2157–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Day, J.W.; Ottaway, N.; Patterson, J.; Gelfanov, V.; Smiley, D.; Gidda, J.; Findeisen, H.; Bruemmer, D.; Drucker, D.J.; Chaudhary, N.; et al. A new glucagon and GLP-1 co-agonist eliminates obesity in rodents. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Henderson, S.J.; Konkar, A.; Hornigold, D.C.; Trevaskis, J.L.; Jackson, R.; Fredin, M.F.; Jansson-Löfmark, R.; Naylor, J.; Rossi, A.; Bednarek, M.A.; et al. Robust anti-obesity and metabolic effects of a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor peptide agonist in rodents and non-human primates. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2016, 18, 1176–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Laker, R.C. Cotadutide (MEDI0382): A dual receptor agonist with glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon activity, modulates hepatic glycogen and fat content. Presented at 80th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Relocated from Chicago to Cyberspace, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–16 June 2020; Available online: https://www.bjd-abcd.com/index.php/bjd/article/view/677/877 (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  157. Holst, J.J.; Albrechtsen, N.J.; Gabe, M.B.N.; Rosenkilde, M.M. Oxyntomodulin: Actions and role in diabetes. Peptides 2018, 100, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ma, T.; Huo, S.; Xu, B.; Li, F.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Lei, H. A novel long-acting oxyntomodulin analogue eliminates diabetes and obesity in mice. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 203, 112496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Schmidt, J.B.; Gregersen, N.T.; Pedersen, S.D.; Arentoft, J.L.; Ritz, C.; Schwartz, T.W.; Holst, J.J.; Astrup, A.; Sjödin, A. Effects of PYY3-36 and GLP-1 on energy intake, energy expenditure, and appetite in overweight men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, E1248–E1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Field, B.C.; Wren, A.M.; Peters, V.; Baynes, K.C.; Martin, N.M.; Patterson, M.; Alsaraf, S.; Amber, V.; Wynne, K.; Ghatei, M.A.; et al. PYY3-36 and oxyntomodulin can be additive in their effect on food intake in overweight and obese humans. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1635–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Finan, B.; Yang, B.; Ottaway, N.; Smiley, D.L.; Ma, T.; Clemmensen, C.; Chabenne, J.; Zhang, L.; Habegger, K.M.; Fischer, K.; et al. A rationally designed monomeric peptide triagonist corrects obesity and diabetes in rodents. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Kim, J.K. Therapeutic efficacy of a novel long-acting GLP-1/GIP/Glucagon triple agonist (HM15211) in NASH and fibrosis animal models. In Proceedings of the EASD annual Meeting, Berlin, Germany, 3 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
  163. Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of HM15211 in Subjects. 2021. Available online: https://trialbulletin.com/lib/entry/ct-04505436 (accessed on 1 March 2021).
Figure 1. An overview of the mechanisms and the differences in fasting (GHRL, MLN) and postprandial (CCK, GLP-1, PYY) gut hormone plasma levels in obese/type 2 diabetes patients before and after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Abbreviations: GHRL: Ghrelin; MLN: Motilin; CCK: Cholecystokinin; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide 1; peptide YY.
Figure 1. An overview of the mechanisms and the differences in fasting (GHRL, MLN) and postprandial (CCK, GLP-1, PYY) gut hormone plasma levels in obese/type 2 diabetes patients before and after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Abbreviations: GHRL: Ghrelin; MLN: Motilin; CCK: Cholecystokinin; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide 1; peptide YY.
Nutrients 13 01839 g001
Table 1. An overview of the meal-related fluctuations in gut hormone levels and their alterations in obesity and type 2 diabetes patients.
Table 1. An overview of the meal-related fluctuations in gut hormone levels and their alterations in obesity and type 2 diabetes patients.
HormoneLocalisationMeal-Related FluctuationsEffect on Food IntakeDysregulation in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Release=
Ghrelin (GHRL)P/D1 cells
(stomach)
Preprandial riseOrexigenicFasting[38,39,40,41,42,43]
Motilin (MLN)M cells (small intestine)Preprandial riseOrexigenicFasting [44]
Cholecystokinin (CCK)I cells (small intestine)Postprandial riseAnorexigenicPostprandial[43,45][46][47]
Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1)L cells (small intestine)Postprandial riseAnorexigenicPostprandial[48,49,50,51,52][53][54,55,56]
Peptide-YY (PYY)L cells (colon)Postprandial riseAnorexigenicPostprandial[43,57,58]
Table 2. An overview of several combination therapies with GLP-1R agonists that are currently in clinical trials.
Table 2. An overview of several combination therapies with GLP-1R agonists that are currently in clinical trials.
Combination TherapyPhysiological EffectDrug Candidates
GLP-1–GIP Insulinotropic effect
Decrease food intake
cardiovascular protection
Drug CompanyStatus
TirzepatideEli LillyPhase II
GLP-1–GCGInsulinotropic effect cardiovascular protection
Decrease food intake
Increase energy expenditure
Drug CompanyStatus
CotadutideAstrazenecaPhase II
EfinopegdutideHanmi PharmaceuticalsPhase II
GLP-1–GCG-GIPInsulinotropic effect
Increase energy expenditure
cardiovascular protection
Decrease food intake
Drug CompanyStatus
MAR423Novo-nordisk/MarcadiaPhase I
HM15211Hanmi PharmacueticalsPhase II
Glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), glucagon (GCG).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farhadipour, M.; Depoortere, I. The Function of Gastrointestinal Hormones in Obesity—Implications for the Regulation of Energy Intake. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061839

AMA Style

Farhadipour M, Depoortere I. The Function of Gastrointestinal Hormones in Obesity—Implications for the Regulation of Energy Intake. Nutrients. 2021; 13(6):1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061839

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farhadipour, Mona, and Inge Depoortere. 2021. "The Function of Gastrointestinal Hormones in Obesity—Implications for the Regulation of Energy Intake" Nutrients 13, no. 6: 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061839

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop