Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Food Consumption and Behavior in France (COVISTRESS Study)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
1- This is a very interesting prospective on how the pandemic time affected people's behaviors and routine. The background seems to be very generic and I would suggest to re-phrase L 47-66. Also. the description of COVIPREV from line 67 appears disconnected to the previous paragraph.
2- In line 91-92 the Authors describe a "secondary goal" which is totally unplugged from the previous background paragraph
3- What about the partecipants' privace for their personal details? Please specify it in the text
4- Include a table reference for describing the population at some point from line 95-99
5- Add an appendix to better visualize the questionnaire used and provide a full description of the questions
6- What about the difference between the group 2 and a putative comparison with men with the same characteristic?
7- In relation to the emotional dimension, I would reject the method you used because it is not supported by a validation
Finally- I suggest to read carefully all text in the paper, because the fluency is not sufficient; moreover, the most of the sentences are too long or can be re-phrase.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear authors this is a very interesting study on the behavioural and emotional changes observed during the COVID-19 lockdown. However there are several points that need improvement:
- Introduction: should be extended
- In the procedure section please correct: June 26th, 2020
- Figure 4: The color description of the bars has been reversed
- Discussion 4.1: Please compare your results within each category with results from other French and international studies.
- Discussion 4.2: Paragraph 3 should be moved to the Introduction
- Discussion 4.2: L. 69-87 should be moved to section 4.1
- Section 4.3: More limitations: cross-sectional study, self-reported data, sample consisted of persons more familiar with the use of internet
- References: Please provide more references from other relevant European studies
- Furthermore, the manuscript would be significantly improved by a thorough english editing.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear authors,
The manuscript is substantially improved.
It just needs an thorough english editing.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx