Next Article in Journal
Dietetic-Led Nutrition Interventions in Patients with COVID-19 during Intensive Care and Ward-Based Rehabilitation: A Single-Center Observational Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Aflatoxin B1 DNA-Adducts in Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Low Exposure Area
Previous Article in Journal
Exposure to Chinese Famine during Early Life Increases the Risk of Fracture during Adulthood
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Food-Related Carbonyl Stress in Cardiometabolic and Cancer Risk Linked to Unhealthy Modern Diet

Nutrients 2022, 14(5), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051061
by Carla Iacobini 1,†, Martina Vitale 1,†, Jonida Haxhi 1, Carlo Pesce 2, Giuseppe Pugliese 1 and Stefano Menini 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(5), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051061
Submission received: 5 February 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published: 3 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall the structure and contents of the manuscrit fit with the aim. However I would suggest to add a table in the section 3 where the food and dietary intake dose with AGE would be detailed.

 

Also some comments:

Line 300-309: more references on AGE absorption are needed

Line 344: figure 5 are not extremely needed

Author Response

Reviewer #1

Overall the structure and contents of the manuscrit fit with the aim.

We thank the Reviewer for providing us with positive comments and useful suggestions.

However I would suggest to add a table in the section 3 where the food and dietary intake dose with AGE would be detailed.

As requested by the Reviewer, a Table reporting the AGE content in common foods and beverages has been added in section 3 of the revised manuscript. Both AGE content per 100 g and per serving size have been indicated.

Also some comments:

Line 300-309: more references on AGE absorption are needed

Two new references (#116 and #117) on AGE absorption have been added in the revised manuscript.

 Line 344: figure 5 are not extremely needed

We understand the point of view of the Reviewer 1 that Figure 5 is not entirely necessary, especially in order to convey a quantitative message. However, we think that panels A, B, C, and D may help the reader to follow the argument and understand the text more deeply. Therefore, we have eliminated panel E and left only the graphs in Figure 5.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Evidences provided in the article were solid and complete.
  2. the article is well- organized and contained many interesting figures.

Author Response

Reviewer #2

Evidences provided in the article were solid and complete.the article is well- organized and contained many interesting figures.

We thank the Reviewer for her/his overall positive judgement

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop