Next Article in Journal
Body Mass Index Mediates the Relationship between the Frequency of Eating Away from Home and Hypertension in Rural Adults: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: Bartha et al. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1300
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumin Supplementation Ameliorates Bile Cholesterol Supersaturation in Hamsters by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Cholesterol Absorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany

1
Center for Natural and Cultural History of Man, Faculty of Medicine/Dentistry, Danube Private University, Förthofstraße 2, 3500 Krems, Austria
2
Anthropology Department, University of California at Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 96064, USA
3
Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science, University of Leipzig, Liebig Str. 12, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
4
State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Richard-Wagner Str. 9, 06114 Halle, Germany
5
Institute of Prehistory and Archaeological Science, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Spalenring 145, 4055 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(9), 1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091831
Submission received: 27 February 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition and Human Oral Health)

Abstract

:
Dental health is closely linked to an individual’s health and diet. This bioarcheological study presents dental caries and stable isotope data obtained from prehistoric individuals (n = 101) from three Early Neolithic sites (c. 5500-4800 BCE) in central Germany. Dental caries and ante-mortem tooth loss (AMTL) were recorded and related to life history traits such as biological sex and age at death. Further, we correlate evidence on caries to carbon and nitrogen isotope data obtained from 83 individuals to assess the relationship between diet and caries. In 68.3% of the adults, carious lesions were present, with 10.3% of teeth affected. If AMTL is considered, the values increase by about 3%. The prevalence of subadults (18.4%) was significantly lower, with 1.8% carious teeth. The number of carious teeth correlated significantly with age but not sex. The isotopic data indicated an omnivorous terrestrial diet composed of domestic plants and animal derived protein but did not correlate with the prevalence of carious lesions. The combined evidence from caries and isotope analysis suggests a prevalence of starchy foods such as cereals in the diet of these early farmers, which aligns well with observations from other Early Neolithic sites but contrasts to Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age populations in Germany.

1. Introduction

In modern-day societies, caries is the most widespread non-communicable disease [1]. The nature of dental caries and its association with diet and oral hygiene are well understood [2,3]. Once the homeostasis of the physiological oral microbiome is disturbed, this may favour the colonization and multiplication of pathogenic bacteria [4,5]. Streptococcus mutans is the main representative of caries-promoting pathogens, which have the ability to metabolize low-molecular-weight carbohydrates such as sugars quite rapidly, producing organic acids such as lactic acid. An excess of acid-producing bacteria leads to the demineralization of tooth enamel, which can ultimately result in failure of the overall tooth structure and tooth loss. The bacterial infection can even spread to the jawbone and lead to so-called periapical alterations or abscesses, thus causing further complications [6]. Dental caries is a multifactorial disease in which individual dietary habits (food, processing, texture), oral hygiene, genetic factors (e.g., enamel thickness, microstructure, tooth morphology, saliva composition), and underlying pathological conditions may also play a role [2,4,7]. As dental health has an impact on a physiological and socio-cultural level, age- and sex-specific associations with caries have been described [8,9].
In the past, a sharp increase in dental caries correlated significantly with fundamental changes in human subsistence strategies and diet [9]. The first important event was the adoption of agricultural practices to procure food in the Neolithic period. Particularly the cultivation of several species of cereal provided a readily available and, thus, secure source of food. The higher starch and, hence, carbohydrate content in this novel diet and the way food was processed resulted in a higher prevalence of caries [9,10]. With the availability of cane and beet sugars in the 18th and 19th centuries, caries occurrence and frequency increased significantly [10]. However, in many industrialized Western nations, dental health has improved in the past few decades, especially among children and adolescents. The main elements are new concepts for prevention and treatment and the desire for wellbeing [3]. Nevertheless, the incidence of caries is still much higher in Western industrialized nations than in most African and Asian populations [11].
In archeological and forensic contexts, teeth can still provide information even when other tissue structures have already been destroyed by taphonomic processes [12,13]. Analyses of pathophysiological changes in dental hard tissue provide information on the frequency and severity of dental disease within a population, as well as information on individual and population-specific behaviors and dietary habits [9,14,15]. In addition, it is possible to visualize spatial and chronological trends in oral health in human history through comparative analysis of dental pathology data [8,10,16,17].
Our study provides an insight into the dental health of the earliest farmers of central Europe, who had their genetic origins in the Near East and settled in central Germany approximately 7000 years ago [18,19]. In addition to a (1) detailed survey of dental caries and ante-mortem tooth loss (AMTL) in three burial communities, this study puts the occurrence of dental caries in relation to stable isotope data obtained from human bone collagen, assessing the possible relationship between diet and dental disease [20]. Stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen can provide information on the main source of dietary proteins and carbohydrates and allows us to differentiate between herbivore, omnivore, carnivore, and piscivore diets [21,22]. We expect to find (2) lower frequencies of dental caries in individuals with slightly higher nitrogen isotope values and, hence, higher amounts of animal protein (milk, meat) in their diet [20]. Another question is (3) how biological sex and (4) age relate to the prevalence of dental caries and AMTL in these populations. Gender-based differences in diet have been described for several Neolithic sites in Europe, with male individuals tending to show isotopic evidence of more frequent animal protein consumption than female individuals [23].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

This bioarcheological study includes data from the three Early Neolithic sites of Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld, Derenburg-Meerenstieg II, and Karsdorf-Steigra in the Middle Elbe-Saale region (MES) of central Germany (Figure 1). Based on its characteristic ceramic ornamentation, the archaeological culture is referred to as linear pottery culture (Linearbandkeramik = LBK) [24]. The MES is bordered in the west and south by low mountain ranges (Harz, Thuringian Forest, and Ore Mountains) and in the east by glacial landscapes. The area is interspersed with fertile loess soils, which offered favorable conditions for settling and farming in prehistoric times [25,26]. In the western regions of the MES in particular, the lime-rich soils support the preservation of bones. The human remains sampled in this study were radiocarbon-dated to the period between 5450 and 4775 cal BC [27].
Two of the sites, Derenburg-Meerenstieg II (DEB) and Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld (HBS), are located in the foothills of the northern Harz region (Nordharzvorland, Harz district, Saxony-Anhalt), at a distance of less than 10 km from each other. With its 47 burials, DEB can be defined as a cemetery. In contrast, the 41 skeletons from HBS were found in so-called settlement burials, i.e., grouped together close to the remains of wooden longhouse structures. Single burials dominated at HBS and DEB, but a few double burials were also found. More than half of the burials contained grave goods such as pottery, earth pigments, and spondylus shells [28]. The third site, Karsdorf-Steigra (KAR) in the Unstrut Valley (Burgenland), is located approximately 100 km from the other sites. As at HBS, the burials at KAR were also found within the settlement. The 30 individuals were grouped primarily to the west of the longhouse structures. All deceased were buried in individual grave pits, and the number of grave goods can be described as low compared to the other sites [29].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Age and Sex Determination

Following international recommendations, a broad range of morphometric methods were used for age and sex determination of the skeletal remains [30,31]. The age determination in adult individuals (>20 years) was based on the assessment of the cranial suture closure [32], changes in the auricular surface [33,34], and the pubic symphysis [35]. In children and adolescents (<20 years = subadults), age determination was based on the tooth development and eruption [36], long-bone lengths [37], and ossification patterns of epiphyses and apophyses [38]. The sex was determined on the basis of morphological and metric criteria in adults only [38,39,40]. Age determinations were made according to the following classification [41]: infans I (0–6 years), infans II (7–14 years), juvenis (15–20 years), adultas (21–40 years), maturitas (41–60 years), senilis (≥61 years).

2.2.2. Morphological Examination of the Teeth

Assessment of the dental status was based on the designation standards of the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) [42]. Adapted to the bioarcheological evaluation of dental caries, the following two quotients were defined: (a) caries frequency (or prevalence) in percent (CF = number of affected individuals × 100/number of assessable individuals), (b) caries experience in percent (CE = number of affected teeth × 100/number of assessed teeth) [43,44,45]. Carious lesions (dental cavities) were divided into five stages: caries superficialis (1), caries media (2), caries profunda without pulpa aperta (3), caries profunda with pulpa aperta (4), radix relicta (5) [12]. So-called “white spots” and “brown spots” were not part of this evaluation.
DMF scores are not appropriate for archeological investigations, because teeth may be missing due to periodontal disease, trauma, or heavy tooth wear, and teeth lost post-mortem (PMTL) may also have been carious [43,46]. Nevertheless, in the present study ante-mortem tooth loss (AMTL) was assessed and combined with carious lesions in relation to the assessable alveolar sockets (dental alveoli). AMTL was considered if the alveolus was completely remodeled or at least showed signs of remodeling. The number of assessable dental alveoli is composed of the number of preserved teeth, AMTL, and PMTL.

2.2.3. Digital Volume Tomography (DVT)

For a more detailed dental analysis of some individuals (n = 13), radiological images were taken at the Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science, Leipzig University using digital volume tomography (DVT, Morita 3D Accuitomo 170), with a slice thickness of 1 mm and a voxel size of 0.250 (tube voltage: 80 kV; tube current: 2.0 mA).

2.2.4. Stable Isotope Data

To assess whether the occurrence and prevalence of carious lesions can be associated with dietary patterns in the three study populations, stable carbon and nitrogen isotope data, δ13C and δ15N, respectively, previously published by Oelze and colleagues [20], were also taken into account. Depending on the state of preservation, the bones used for isotope analysis were mainly ribs, but a few long bones and skull fragments were also sampled. Stable isotopes in collagen samples were extracted following the procedure outlined by Richards and Hedges [47] and analyzed in a Flash EA 2112 coupled to a DeltaXP isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo-Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. The δ13C and δ15N values are reported here in ‰ following the international standards vPDB and AIR. The analytical error was better than 0.2‰ (1σ) for both isotope systems [20]. Collagen quality was affirmed by inspecting %nitrogen, %carbon, and the atomic C:N ratios for each sample following the recommendations by Ambrose [48].

2.2.5. Statistical Data Analysis

To compare the prevalence of caries with life history parameters and stable isotope data in this archeological population with post-mortem tooth loss, we calculated percent caries (caries%) as the number of teeth affected by caries divided by the number of teeth present per individual. This allows us to assess dental caries in light of age, sex, site, and dietary patterns across individuals. We ran two linear regression models in R (version R 4.1.1, [49]) with the alpha level set to 0.05. One model was run using the full dataset (n = 83), thus testing the effect of age (average value in years), site (3 levels: DEB, HBS, KAR), and δ13C and δ15N values on the percentage of teeth affected by caries per individual (%caries/individual). Log1p transformations were conducted to remove the zeros from the response variable %caries/individual in both models. The fixed effect of sex was also included in the second model, having excluded all subadult individuals and those of undetermined sex from the dataset (n = 64). In the full dataset model, the possible interaction between δ13C and δ15N was initially tested; this, however, was not significant (χ2 = 0.0, df = 76, p = 0.958) and was subsequently dropped from the full model. The interaction between isotopes was not considered in the second model.
Model diagnostics were carried out on both models by visually inspecting histograms, qq-plots, and residuals plotted against fitted values, all of which confirmed normally distributed and homogeneous residuals. Testing variance inflation factors in both models found no evidence for collinearity (vifs around 1–1.2). The final results were obtained by comparing both full models with a null model each, which only contained the fixed effect of site, using chi-square independence tests.

3. Results

Out of a total of 116 skeletons recovered from the three Neolithic sites, the dentitions of 101 individuals could be examined for this study (Table 1). These comprised 63 adults and 38 subadults (<20 years) with 1910 permanent and 277 deciduous teeth (Appendix A Table A1). For a total of 83 individuals, we can report both dental caries and isotope analysis results.
The model testing the effects of age, site, and δ13C and δ15N values in relation to the percentage of carious teeth per individual (n = 83) was highly significant (χ2 = 65.4, df = 77, p < 0.000). However, as shown in Figure 2, this was driven exclusively by the effect of age (p < 0.000). Interestingly, none of the other predictors had any impact on the percentage of caries per individual (site: p= 0. 878, δ13C: p = 0.594, δ15N: p = 0.433). A similar pattern emerged from the second model which included the fixed effect of sex in a subset of all adult individuals. Here too the full model was highly significant (χ2 = 43.2, df = 57, p < 0.000), exclusively driven by the effect of age (p < 0.000) and not by site (p = 0.613), sex (p = 0.733) or δ13C (p = 0.669), and δ15N (p = 0.431) values.

3.1. Age-Specific Differences

Table 2 summarizes the caries frequencies (CF) and caries experience (CE) for all adult and subadult individuals in this study. At DEB, 18 out of the 28 adults (64.3%) were affected by caries. The CF in the adults from HBS (12/17, 70.6%) and KAR (13/18, 72.2%) were slightly higher, but the number of assessable individuals was lower. A CF of 68.3% (43/63) can be determined for all three groups taken together. When considering CE, the adults from HBS exhibited the highest number of carious teeth (12.0%), followed by the group from KAR, with a CE of 10.9%. The adult group from DEB showed the lowest CE rate of 8.6%. Combining all three LBK sites, a CE value of 10.3% can be determined. In most cases, a small number of individuals were characterized by particularly severe dental cavities. AMTL could only be detected in adult individuals. Of 63 adults, 14 are affected (22.2%). Individuals from KAR are most frequently affected by AMTL; in relation to the assessable dental alveoli, HBS is in the lead. In total, two adults show AMTL but no carious lesions, which raises the combined frequency (AMTL + caries) by individuals to 71.4%. Looking at the combined data in relation to the assessable alveolar sockets, the average frequency increases by 3%.
Among the subadults, the CF value was highest at KAR with 30% (Table 2). At DEB, two out of 12 (16.7%) and at HBS two out of 16 subadults (12.5%) were affected. Overall, seven of 38 subadult individuals (18.4%) had carious lesions. With 4–5 affected teeth, the CE values in the subadults of all three sites were low. At KAR, 2.9% of the preserved teeth were affected and at DEB, 1.6%. The lowest CE rate (1.4%) can be determined for the subadult group from HBS. Combining the data of the subadult individuals from all three LBK sites results in a CE rate of 1.8%. AMTL was not observed among the subadult group.
A closer look at all adult individuals by age group (Table 3) suggests an increase in both CF and CE with advancing age. The same tendency can be described for AMTL and AMTL combined with caries, both at the individual level and by alveolar sockets. However, the oldest age group (>61) is only represented by a single individual.
The subadults affected are exclusively children of the infans II age group (7–14 years) and juvenile individuals. Carious deciduous teeth were observed in the infans II group. Carious lesions are detectable in the permanent molars of an approximately 12-year-old child and two juvenile individuals (15–20 years). No carious lesions were found in the infans I group (0–6 years).

3.2. Sex-Related Differences

The results of our statistical data analysis show no significant effect of sex on the percentage of carious teeth per individual among all adults from the three Neolithic sites. However, although the sample sizes per archeological site are small, we can describe some trends in our dataset. At DEB and KAR, females (81.3% and 83.3%) tend to be more frequently affected by dental caries than males (40.0% and 63.6%) (Table 4). At HBS, the situation is different: all six male individuals show evidence of dental cavities, but only six out of 11 females (54.5%) have carious lesions. Overall, CF appears slightly higher for females (72.7%) than for males (63.0%). At the individual level AMTL is slightly higher in females, but the combined data from AMTL and caries do not lead to any significant changes.
Similar results occur when looking at the CE values. Again, males from DEB and KAR (5.9% and 4.9%, respectively) seem less affected by carious teeth than the females (10.2% and 21.6%). At HBS, males (13.7%) tend to show more carious lesions than females (11.5%). The female individuals from KAR show the highest CE with 21.6%. AMTL is more common in females than in males. In comparison, the combined data from AMTL and caries show a small but non-significant increase in frequencies.

3.3. Affected Tooth Types

The adult individuals from all three sites are summarized in Table 5. The distribution shows a clear trend, whereby the post-canine teeth are clearly more affected by carious lesions than the anterior teeth. The first molar (tooth 16; 22.4%) and the second premolar (tooth 15; 20.4%) are most affected in the right maxilla. In the left maxilla, the most dental cavities are found on the second molar (tooth 27; 33.3%), followed by the first molar (tooth 26; 22.9%). In the right and left mandibles, most defects are evenly distributed among the molars, with third molars being slightly more affected.
Due to the low prevalence in the subadults, a tabular presentation was omitted. A total of 13 teeth, eight deciduous teeth and five permanent teeth, are affected. The affected deciduous teeth are seven molars and one canine. The affected permanent teeth are four second molars and one first molar.

3.4. Severity of Caries Lesions

When looking at the adult individuals from all sites, most teeth affected by caries show only minor lesions in the form of caries superficialis (grade 1) and caries media (grade 2) (Table 6). These two forms of caries represent approximately 60% of all defects. Deeper structural defects, such as caries profunda without (grade 3) or with opened pulp cavity (grade 4), are less frequently observed considering the total number of affected teeth. There are differences between the sites: at DEB, the proportion of grade 4 cavities (25%) is higher, whereas, at KAR, the proportion of grade 3 (19.2%) and grade 5 (21.2%) is higher. HBS also shows a higher proportion of grade 5 defects (20.4%), which are associated with the complete destruction of the dental crowns.
In the subadult individuals, the severity does not exceed grade 3. Of the eight deciduous teeth, two show grade 3, four teeth show grade 2, and two show grade 1. Of the five permanent teeth, three exhibit grade 1, one shows grade 2, and two show grade 3.

3.5. Stable Isotope Ratios and Diet

The stable isotope ratios for carbon and nitrogen for the three study populations have been reported and discussed previously by Oelze and colleagues [20]. No significant differences in stable isotope values were found between the sites. The stable isotope values in all fully weaned individuals (estimated age older than 5 years) cluster tightly in δ13C with an average value of −19.8‰ (±0.3‰ 1σ). The δ15N values for these individuals show slightly more variation with an average value of 8.8‰ (±0.7‰ 1σ). Subadults tend to have higher δ13C and even higher δ15N values than adult individuals.

4. Discussion

This paper presents the dental caries profiles and matching stable isotope records of three early Neolithic farming populations to describe the nuanced relationship between diet and dental heath in one of the earliest agricultural societies of central Europe. The comparison between HBS, DEB, and KAR is problematic due to the small number of individuals per burial community. Our statistic model did not pick up any differences between sites in the percentage of caries per individual, and the three sites were also found to be almost indistinguishable isotopically [20]. This suggests that, in respect of their dental health, we can treat all individuals sampled as one study population. The marginal differences between sites, such as the lower CF and CE of the adult individuals from DEB or the higher caries burden in the males from HBS, are of limited significance. The combined data of AMTL and caries show a relatively small, non-significant increase in the frequencies of age- and sex-specific differences. Overall, the three LBK populations show a rather moderate degree of dental cavities in which the milder forms of caries such as caries superficialis and caries media dominate. The results can be discussed under various aspects, with nutrition playing an essential role.

4.1. The Influence of Nutrition

The δ13C data point to a dependence on domesticated C3-plants for these early farmers, whereas the possibility of prevalent wild plant foods and C4-plant cultivation can be excluded [20,50,51]. The δ15N values suggest that this domestic plant-based diet was low in leguminous plants which fix nitrogen directly from the soil [21] and was mixed with considerable amounts of animal-derived protein, most likely meat from domestic cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs [20]. A previous comparison of human δ15N values with those of domestic animals from each site suggested that individuals from DEB may have had slightly less animal protein in their everyday diet than the inhabitants of the two other sites [20]. If that is the case, we would predict that the plant and, hence, possibly cereal proportion of the diet might have been higher for DEB community members. However, this assumption does not align with the CF and CE values of the DEB individuals, which are very similar to those of the other two sites.
Based on the genetic evidence from several individuals from DEB, we can say that these people were likely not lactase-persistent and, hence, could not digest lactose from unfermented milk after reaching maturity [52]. As expected, children younger than five years (n = 13) have slightly elevated δ13C and δ15N values compared to older individuals, as their isotope values are influenced by the tropic level increase associated with human breastmilk consumption [20,53]. Isotopic differences between adult males and females are insignificant and do not suggest that men had considerably better access to meat than women. Overall, the isotopic evidence indicates that all individuals led an agricultural lifestyle with a mixed diet of domesticated plants (cereals and small amounts of legumes) and animal products [20].
Cereals occupied an important position in the diet of Early Neolithic farming cultures. The geographic region studied offered rich loess soils and, thus, optimal conditions for cereal cultivation. Archeological investigations show that the LBK people preferred to settle in these loess areas [24,25]. The cultivation of cereals increased the proportion of carbohydrate-rich food. New food processing techniques made starch and sugar easily accessible to bacteria of the oral cavity, thus promoting the development of caries [10]. Studies indicate that early farmers suffered an increase in caries prevalence compared to hunter-gatherers [9]. In addition to diet, genetic factors also affect the quality of tooth structure and saliva production [2,4]. Nevertheless, an essential role in cariogenesis can be attributed to the starch and sugar content in the diet [2,54]. Epidemiological studies suggest an increased caries risk when starch is combined with sugar [55]. In the European Early Neolithic, fruits and honey can be assumed as sweet foods. Genetic analyses of dental calculus samples from different time periods demonstrate that the composition of the oral flora from the Neolithic to the Middle Ages was more diverse than that of recent populations [56]. This trend can be attributed to continuous changes in the human diet.

4.2. Age-Specific Differences and Caries Localisation

At 68.3%, the CF was significantly higher in the adults than in the subadult individuals, at 18.4%. The difference in CE was also very clear, where the proportion of affected teeth was 5.7 times higher in adults than in children and adolescents. In principle, young children between 0 and 6 years of age were not affected. Only in the older children and adolescents a few carious teeth were found, including some deciduous teeth. The nutritional data indicated that children older than three years were weaned. Before that, there does not seem to have been any risk of dental caries, e.g., by feeding premasticated food.
The data confirm that the risk of dental caries increased significantly with age. Within the dentition, caries was almost exclusively found in the post-canine teeth. Few cavities in the anterior teeth were found in older group members who were severely affected by caries. The carious lesions seem to have originated predominantly on the approximal surfaces of the interdental space. An impressive example is the dentition of a 35–45-year-old male individual (ID 484) from DEB (Figure 3a–d). The morphological examination shows pronounced carious lesions on a total of five teeth, three maxillary molars (teeth 16, 26, 27), and two premolars (teeth 15, 44). In the three maxillary molars, the carious lesions originate on the approximal surfaces (Figure 3a). Severe wear is noticeable on the occlusal surfaces and is particularly pronounced in the anterior region (Figure 3a,c). Periapical changes resulting from deep caries lesions with opening of the pulp cavity are visible on teeth 26, 27, and 44 (Figure 3a,d). These periapical lesions can be clearly localized in DVT images of the maxilla and mandible (Figure 4a,b). Due to the osteolytic processes in the jaw bones, it is very likely that the man suffered from recurrent inflammatory reactions. Without medical intervention, chronic oral infections can spread to the adjacent tissue and the entire body [57,58,59,60].

4.3. Sex-Related Differences

In the present study, females had a slightly higher CF (72.7%) than males (63.0%). The difference was even more pronounced for CE. Although this difference is not statistically significant, female individuals had more carious teeth, with a CE of 13.1%, than male individuals with 7.5%. The same trend can be observed considering AMTL.
Differences between the sexes are not uncommon in archeological and ethnological contexts, and a higher carious burden is often reported in females [9,61,62]. This is usually explained by a difference in diet, with females consuming less animal protein than males. It is supposed that females consume more carbohydrate-rich foods to meet their primary caloric needs [16,63,64]. However, a higher proportion of animal protein in the diet has a more beneficial effect on dental health [10]. The proteins found in dairy products, especially casein, reduce caries activity by inhibiting bacterial attachment to enamel as well as decreasing the solubility of hydroxyapatite, thus counteracting demineralization [65,66,67]. However, it cannot be ruled out that women preferred foods with a higher starch or sugar content, such as porridge, fruits, and honey.
In addition to dietary habits, hormonal differences between the sexes can also play a role [63,68]. For example, females show lower salivary flow rates than males [69,70]. Furthermore, high estrogen levels during pregnancy have a negative effect on the quantity and composition of saliva [71,72]. This favors the colonization of cariogenic bacteria and the development of periodontal diseases, which indirectly affects tooth loss. This explains the observed higher number of AMTL in females in the present study and the correlation between births and tooth loss in other studies [73,74,75].

4.4. Influence of Dental Wear

Occlusal wear protects against occlusal caries to a certain extent by preventing plaque from adhering to the tooth [10]. Mastication also promotes wear at the contact points of the teeth, which is called interproximal (interstitial) wear. The continuous progression of both occlusal and interstitial wear reduces the contact surfaces between the teeth [76]. As a result, the interdental spaces are better flushed with saliva, which protects the teeth from approximal caries (e.g., anterior teeth Figure 3a). However, if the wear continues, there is a high probability that the pulp cavity will be exposed. In the past, this could lead to the death and subsequent loss of the tooth [6]. Compared to current industrialized nations, dental wear was well developed in Neolithic populations, as shown in Figure 3c,d. The main reason for this was mechanical abrasion induced by dietary habits and can be explained by the higher proportion of rough, fiber-rich food as well as naturally occurring sand and grit in processed food [10,77,78]. Flour is a perfect example, as it was much more coarsely ground in ancient times and contained grit due to the use of grinding stones [79]. A total of 74 adult individuals from the sites investigated were subjected to an analysis of the degree of dental wear [80]. The results showed that the degree of wear of the occlusal surfaces continuously increased with age and reached its maximum level in mature and senile individuals. A comparison between the anterior and posterior regions showed that the mean degree of dental wear was higher in anterior teeth than in post-canines. Slightly more wear was observed in the upper jaw, especially in the anterior teeth. Differences between the upper and lower jaw were attributed to a higher load on the upper teeth due to occupational activities and the use of teeth as a third hand [81,82].

4.5. Comparative Data from Other Neolithic Sites

Comparing the prevalence of caries in different populations from the same or from neighboring geographic regions can provide information about the living conditions and subsistence strategies (Table 7). Comparative data from early farming populations (LBK/BK) from central Germany show a similar range of CE values for adults [83,84], with a considerably higher CE at Wandersleben [85]. If AMTL is included in the calculations, the frequencies increase and align with those from Wandersleben and Sondershausen. The low variability within the CE values does not indicate any significant nutritional differences within early farming populations in the MES. Data from the LBK site at Aiterhofen (southern Bavaria) show a similar CE value for adults, but the CF differs significantly [86]. In contrast, a lower CE was observed in adults from the Early Neolithic site of Kleinhadersdorf in Lower Austria [87]. In the subadults, the CE ranged between 1 and 3%; at Aiterhofen [88] and Kleinhadersdorf [87] the proportion of affected deciduous teeth was higher. The CF showed a greater range of variation in both adults and subadults. Different environmental conditions and subsistence strategies must be expected in different geographic regions. Isotope analyses from southern Germany, for example, show higher δ15N values (mean: 9.7‰) than in the MES, which is interpreted as evidence of a higher proportion of animal protein in the diet [89]. In addition, sample size and differences in the age structure of the investigated populations may also contribute to the variations.
Lower CF and CE values were observed for the later periods of the Neolithic (MN, LN) and for the Early Bronze Age (EBA) [17,90,91]. This indicates a change in subsistence and dietary patterns. The results of C/N analyses from the Middle and Late Neolithic and the Early Bronze Age suggest that the amount of animal protein in the diet increased [92]. The higher proportion of meat and dairy products might have had a positive effect not only on dental health but also on the general wellbeing. The diachronic comparison suggests that the early farmers’ diet was characterized by a higher proportion of carbohydrates, which can be attributed primarily to the cultivation of cereals [17,25].

5. Conclusions

The aim of this bioarcheological study was to provide insights into the relationship of dental caries and diet in c. 7000-year-old Early Neolithic farmers from central Germany. The results show that, although consuming a diet lower in sugar content compared to modern populations, carious lesions were not uncommon among early farmers. We found no significant differences between the sexes or between burial communities but, as anticipated, a strong effect of age on the presence of dental caries. A diet rich in carbohydrates can be blamed for this, with grain consumption playing an important part. Single cases illustrate the painful fate of some older individuals. It is evident that caries acquired symptomatic significance with increasing age, while carious lesions did not yet play a role in infants still relying strongly on mother’s milk. The absence of a sex effect is supportive of the notion of a comparatively egalitarian lifestyle, in which both sexes have equivalent access to plant and animal-based foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.N. and V.M.O.; methodology, N.N. and V.M.O.; formal analysis, N.N. and V.M.O.; investigation, N.N. and V.M.O.; data curation, N.N. and V.M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, N.N., V.M.O. and K.W.A.; writing—review and editing, N.N., V.M.O., K.W.A., O.S. and H.M.; visualization, N.N., V.M.O. and O.S.; supervision, K.W.A. and H.M.; project administration, K.W.A. and H.M.; funding acquisition, K.W.A. and H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the German Research Foundation, grant number Al 287/7-1 and 7-3, Me 3245/1-1 and 1-3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are contained in the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sandy Hämmerle (prehistrans.com (accessed on 15 February 2022)) for her support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Number of individuals, permanent teeth, deciduous teeth and teeth lost ante-mortem (AMTL) of the three burial sites by age groups.
Table A1. Number of individuals, permanent teeth, deciduous teeth and teeth lost ante-mortem (AMTL) of the three burial sites by age groups.
Age (Years)Individuals Permanent TeethDeciduous TeethAMTL
Derenburg
0–6654500
7–14484230
15–2024400
21–401839004
41–601020405
>610000
total40776739
Halberstadt
0–6840830
7–14565330
15–2035820
21–401023109
41–607178014
>610000
total3357211823
Karsdorf
0–6511550
7–14445310
15–2012900
21–40925200
41–608204018
>6112105
total285628623

References

  1. Marcenes, W.; Kassebaum, N.J.; Bernabé, E.; Flaxman, A.; Naghavi, M.; Lopez, A.; Murray, C.J. Global burden of oral conditions in 1990–2010: A systematic analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pitts, N.B.; Zero, D.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Ekstrand, K.; Weintraub, J.A.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Tagami, J.; Twetman, S.; Tsakos, G.; Ismail, A. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Peres, M.A.; Macpherson, L.; Weyant, R.J.; Daly, B.; Venturelli, R.; Mathur, M.R.; Listl, S.; Celeste, R.K.; Guarnizo-Herreño, C.C.; Kearns, C.; et al. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge. Lancet 2019, 394, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Werneck, R.I.; Mira, M.T.; Trevilatto, P.C. A critical review: An overview of genetic influence on dental caries. Oral Dis. 2010, 16, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Strużycka, I. The Oral Microbiome in Dental Caries. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alt, K.W.; Türp, J.C.; Wächter, R. Periapical Lesions–Clinical and Anthropological Aspects. In Dental Anthropology. Fundamentals, Limits, and Prospects; Alt, K.W., Rösing, F.W., Teschler-Nicola, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Vienna, Austria, 1998; pp. 247–276. [Google Scholar]
  7. Selwitz, R.H.; Ismail, A.I.; Pitts, N.B. Dental caries. Lancet 2007, 369, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lukacs, J.R. Dental paleopathology: Methods for reconstructing dietary patterns. In Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton; Kennedy, M.Y.I., Kennedy, K.A.R., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 261–286. [Google Scholar]
  9. Larsen, C.S. Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 67–86. [Google Scholar]
  10. Caselitz, P. Caries–ancient plague of humankind. In Dental Anthropology. Fundamentals, Limits, and Prospects; Alt, K.W., Rösing, F.W., Teschler-Nicola, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Vienna, Austria, 1998; pp. 203–226. [Google Scholar]
  11. Petersen, P.E.; Bourgeois, D.; Ogawa, H.; Estupinan-Day, S.; Ndiaye, C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 661–669. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hillson, S. Dental Anthropology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bailey, S.E.; Hublin, J.J. Dental Perspectives on Human Evolution; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  14. Maixner, F.; Turaev, D.; Cazenave-Gassiot, A.; Janko, M.; Krause-Kyora, B.; Hoopmann, M.R.; Kusebauch, U.; Sartain, M.; Guerriero, G.; O’Sullivan, N.; et al. The Iceman’s Last Meal Consisted of Fat, Wild Meat, and Cereals. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 2348–2355.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Koruyucu, M.; Erdal, Y.S. Reconstruction of dietary habits in the Early Bronze Age of Anatolia through the analysis of dental caries and wear. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2021, 31, 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larsen, C.S.; Shavit, R.; Griffin, M.C. Dental caries evidence for dietary change: An archaeological context. In Advances in Dental Anthropology; Kelley, M.A., Larsen, C.S., Eds.; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 179–202. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nicklisch, N.; Ganslmeier, R.; Siebert, A.; Friederich, S.; Meller, H.; Alt, K.W. Holes in teeth-Dental caries in Neolithic and Early Bronze Age populations in Central Germany. Ann. Anat. 2016, 203, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haak, W.; Balanovsky, O.; Sanchez, J.J.; Koshel, S.; Zaporozhchenko, V.; Adler, C.J.; Der Sarkissian, C.S.; Brandt, G.; Schwarz, C.; Nicklisch, N.; et al. Ancient DNA from European early neolithic farmers reveals their near eastern affinities. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Brandt, G.; Haak, W.; Adler, C.J.; Roth, C.; Szécsényi-Nagy, A.; Karimnia, S.; Möller-Rieker, S.; Meller, H.; Ganslmeier, R.; Friederich, S.; et al. Ancient DNA reveals key stages in the formation of Central European mitochondrial genetic diversity. Science 2013, 342, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Oelze, V.M.; Siebert, A.; Nicklisch, N.; Meller, H.; Dresely, V.; Alt, K.W. Early Neolithic diet and animal husbandry. Stable isotope evidence from three Linearbandkeramik (LBK) sites in Central Germany. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011, 38, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DeNiro, M.; Epstein, S. Influence of the Diet on the Distribution of Nitrogen Isotopes in Animals. Geoch. Cosmochim. Acta 1981, 48, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katzenberg, M.A. Stable Isotope Analysis: A Tool for Studying Past Diet, Demography, and Life History. In Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton; Katzenberg, M.A., Saunders, S.R., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 411–414. [Google Scholar]
  23. Masclans, A.; Bickle, P.; Hamon, C. Sexual inequalities in the Early Neolithic? Exploring relationships between sexes/genders at the cemetery of Vedrovice using use-wear analysis, diet and mobility. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 2021, 28, 232–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Friederich, S. Frühneolithikum: Linienbandkeramik bis Gatersleben. In Früh-und Mittelneolithikum; Meller, H., Ed.; Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt: Halle (Saale), Germany, 2021; pp. 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ostritz, S. Naturräumliche Grundlagen der neolithischen Besiedlung im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet (MESG). In Das Neolithikum im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet und der Altmark; Beier, H.-J., Einicke, R., Eds.; Beier & Beran: Wilkau-Haßlau, Germany, 1994; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Litt, T. Naturraum Mitteldeutschland im Neolithikum. In Früh-und Mittelneolithikum; Meller, H., Ed.; Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt: Halle (Saale), Germany, 2021; pp. 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicklisch, N. Spurensuche an Skeletten. Paläodemografische und epidemiologische Untersuchungen an neolithischen und frühbronzezeitlichen Bestattungen aus dem Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet im Kontext populationsdynamischer Prozesse. In Forschungsberichte des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle; Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt: Halle (Saale), Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fritsch, B.; Claßen, E.; Müller, U.; Dresely, V. Die linienbandkeramischen Gräberfelder von Derenburg "Meerenstieg II" und Halberstadt “Sonntagsfeld”, Lkr. Harz. Jahresschr. Mitteldt. Vorgesch. 2011, 92, 25–229. [Google Scholar]
  29. Behnke, H.J. Erste Siedler der Linienbandkeramik in der Karsdorfer Feldflur. Ergebnisse der Grabungen im Jahr 2005. Arch. Sachsen-Anhalt 2007, 5, 18–33. [Google Scholar]
  30. White, T.D.; Folkens, P.A. Human Osteology, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. Buikstra, J.E.; Ubelaker, D.H. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. In Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History; Arkansas Archeological Survey: Fayetteville, NC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  32. Meindl, R.S.; Lovejoy, C.O. Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1985, 68, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lovejoy, C.O.; Meindel, R.S.; Pryzbeck, T.R.; Mensforth, R.P. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of adult skeletal age and death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1985, 68, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Buckberry, J.L.; Chamberlain, A.T. Age estimation from the auricular surface of the Ilium: A Revised Method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2002, 119, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brooks, S.T.; Suchey, J.M. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. J. Hum. Evol. 1990, 5, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ubelaker, D.H. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation, 2nd ed.; Taraxacum: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  37. Stloukal, M.; Hanáková, H. Die Länge der Längsknochen altslavischer Bevölkerungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Wachstumsfragen. HOMO 1978, 29, 53–69. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferembach, D.; Schwidetzky, I.; Stloukal, M. Recommendations for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. J. Hum. Evol. 1980, 9, 517–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Phenice, T.W. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1969, 30, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Murail, P.; Bruzek, J.; Houët, F.; Cunha, E. DSP: A tool for probabilistic sexdiagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements. Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris 2005, 17, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Knussmann, R. Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen. In Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik; Fischer: Stuttgart, Germany, 1996; p. 169. [Google Scholar]
  42. Alt, K.W.; Türp, J.C. Roll call: Thirty-two white horses on a red field. The advantages of the FDI two-digit system of designating teeth. In Dental Anthropology. Fundamentals, Limits, and Prospects; Alt, K.W., Rösing, F.W., Teschler-Nicola, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Vienna, Austria, 1998; pp. 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  43. Alt, K.W. Karies in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Zur Epidemiologie einer “Volksseuche”. In Pein und Plagen. Aspekte Einer Historischen Epidemiologie; Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A., Henke, W., Eds.; Edition Archaea: Gelsenkirchen, Germany, 2001; pp. 156–213. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hillson, S. Recording dental caries in archaeological human remains. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2001, 11, 249–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Machiulskiene, V.; Campus, G.; Carvalho, J.C.; Dige, I.; Ekstrand, K.R.; Jablonski-Momeni, A.; Maltz, M.; Manton, D.J.; Martignon, S.; Martinez-Mier, E.A.; et al. Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. Caries Res. 2020, 54, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hillson, S. Teeth; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; p. 295. [Google Scholar]
  47. Richards, M.P.; Hedges, R.E.M. Stable Isotope Evidence for Similarities in the Types of Marine Foods Used by Late Mesolithic Humans at Sites along the Atlantic Coast of Europe. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1999, 26, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ambrose, S.H. Preparation and Characterization of Bone and Tooth Collagen for Isotopic Analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1990, 17, 431–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 11 August 2021).
  50. Beug, H.-J. Vegetationsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über die Besiedlung im Unteren Eichsfeld, Landkreis Göttingen, vom frühen Neolithikum bis zum Mittelalter. Neue Ausgr. Forsch. Niedersachs. 1992, 20, 261–339. [Google Scholar]
  51. Drucker, D.G.; Bridault, A.; Hobson, K.A.; Szuma, E.; Bocherens, H. Can carbon-13 in large herbivores reflect the canopy effect in temperate and boreal ecosystems? Evidence from modern and ancient ungulates. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2008, 266, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Burger, J.; Kirchner, M.; Bramanti, B.; Haak, W.; Thomas, M.G. Absence of the lactase-persistence-associated allele in early Neolithic Europeans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3736–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fogel, M.L.; Tuross, N.; Owsley, D.W. Nitrogen isotope tracers of human lactation in modern and archaeological populations. In Annual Report of the Director: Geophysical Laboratory; Carnegie Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; Volume 88, pp. 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  54. Moynihan, P.; Petersen, P.E. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7, 201–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Halvorsrud, K.; Lewney, J.; Craig, D.; Moynihan, P.J. Effects of Starch on Oral Health: Systematic Review to Inform WHO Guideline. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 98, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adler, C.J.; Dobney, K.; Weyric, L.S.; Kaidonis, J.; Walker, A.W.; Haak, H.; Corey, J.A.; Bradshaw, C.J.A.; Townsend, G.; Sołtysiak, A.; et al. Sequencing ancient calcified dental plaque shows changes in oral micro-biota with dietary shifts of the Neolithic and Industrial revolutions. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Alt, K.W.; Nicklisch, N.; Held, P.; Meyer, C.; Rossbach, A.; Burwinkel, M. Zähne als Gesundheits- und Mortalitätsrisiko. In Traumatologische und pathologische Veränderungen an prähistorischen und historischen Skelettreste. Diagnose, Ursachen und Kontext; Piek, J., Terberger, T., Eds.; Verlag Marie Leidorf: Rahden/Westf., Germany, 2008; pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zoellner, H. Dental infection and vascular disease. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2011, 37, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rustemeyer, J.; Bremerich, A. Necessity of surgical dental foci treatment prior to organ transplantation and heart valve replacement. Clin. Oral Investig. 2007, 11, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pathak, J.L.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Ge, L. The role of oral microbiome in respiratory health and diseases. Respir. Med. 2021, 185, 106475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bennike, P. Palaeopathology of Danish Skeletons; Akademisk Forlag: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lukacs, J.R. Sex differences in dental caries rates with the origin of agriculture in South Asia. Curr. Anthropol. 1996, 37, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lukacs, J.R.; Largaespada, L.L. Explaining sex differences in dental caries prevalence: Saliva, hormones, and “life-history” etiologies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2008, 18, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Peterson, J. Woman’s Share in Neolithic Society: A View from the Southern Levant. Near East. Archaeol. 2016, 79, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vacca-Smith, A.M.; van Wuyckhouuse, B.C.; Tabak, L.A.; Bowen, W.H. The effect of milk and casein proteins on the adherence of streptococcus mutans to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Arch. Oral Biol. 1994, 39, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kashket, S.; DePaola, D.P. Cheese consumption and the development and progression of dental caries. Nutr. Rev. 2002, 60, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Aimutis, W.R. Bioactive properties of milk proteins with particular focus on anticariogenesis. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, S989–S995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lukacs, J.R. Sex differences in dental caries experience: Clinical evidence, complex etiology. Clin. Oral Investig. 2011, 15, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bergdahl, M. Salivary flow and oral complaints in adult dental patients. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2000, 28, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dodds, M.W.J.; Johnson, D.; Yeh, C.-K. Health benefits of saliva: A review. J. Dent. 2005, 33, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Laine, M.; Tenovuo, J.; Lehtonen, O.P.; Ojanotko-Harri, A.; Vilja, P.; Tuohimaa, P. Pregnancy-related changes in human whole saliva. Arch. Oral Biol. 1988, 33, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salvolini, E.; Di Giorgio, R.; Curatola, A.; Mazzanti, L.; Fratto, G. Biochemical modifications of human whole saliva induced by pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1998, 195, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Christensen, K.; Gaist, D.; Jeune, B.; Vaupel, J.W. A tooth per child? Lancet 1998, 352, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Laine, M.A. Effect of pregnancy on periodontal and dental health. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2002, 60, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Russell, S.L.; Ickovics, J.R.; Yaffee, R.A. Parity and untreated dental caries in US women. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rose, J.C.; Ungar, P.S. Gross dental wear and dental microwear in historical perspective. In Dental Anthropology. Fundamentals, Limits, and Prospects; Alt, K.W., Rösing, F.W., Teschler-Nicola, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Vienna, Austria, 1998; pp. 349–386. [Google Scholar]
  77. Alt, K.W.; Rossbach, A. Nothing in Nature Is as Consistent as Change. In Comparative Dental Morphology; Koppe, T., Meyer, G., Alt, K.W., Eds.; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2009; Volume 3, pp. 190–196. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sperber, G.H. Dental Wear: Attrition, Erosion, and Abrasion-A Palaeo-Odontological Approach. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Mays, S. The Archaeology of Human Bones; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  80. Nasse, D. Betrachtung Abnormaler Abrasionsmuster Prähistorischer Bevölkerungen aus Sachsen-Anhalt. Master’s Thesis, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  81. Alt, K.W.; Pichler, S.L. Artificial modifications of human teeth. In Dental Anthropology. Fundamentals, Limits, and Prospects; Alt, K.W., Rösing, F.W., Teschler-Nicola, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Vienna, Austria, 1998; pp. 387–415. [Google Scholar]
  82. Molnar, P. Dental wear and oral pathology: Possible evidence and consequences of habitual use of teeth in a Swedish Neolithic sample. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2008, 136, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bach, A. Neolithische Populationen im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet. Zur Anthropologie des Neolithikums unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bandkeramiker; Weimarer Monographien zur Ur-und Frühgeschichte: Weimar, Germany, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  84. Penser, E. Stomatologische Untersuchungen an Erwachsenen Neolithikern aus Dem Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet. Ph.D. Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  85. Haschen, S. Stomatologische Untersuchungen an der Linienbandkeramischen Bevölkerung von Wandersleben, Kreis Gotha. Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  86. Baum, N. Aiterhofen-Ödmühle. Paläodontologie eines bandkeramischen Gräberfeldes in Niederbayern. Prähist. Zeitschr. 1989, 65, 157–202. [Google Scholar]
  87. Tiefenböck, B.; Teschler-Nicola, M. Teil II: Anthropologie. In Das Linearbandkeramische Gräberfeld von Kleinhadersdorf; Horjes, B., Ed.; Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften: Wien, Austria, 2013; Volume 82, pp. 382–392. [Google Scholar]
  88. Carli-Thiele, P. Spuren von Mangelerkrankungen An Steinzeitlichen Kinderskeletten; Fortschritte in der Palaeopathologie und Osteoarchaeologie; Erich Goltze: Göttingen, Germany, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  89. Knipper, C. Kohlenstoff-und Stickstoffanalysen an bandkeramischen Bestattungen vom “Viesenhäuser Hof” bei Stuttgart-Mühlhausen: Implikationen zur Ernährungsrekonstruktion, Geschlechtsspezifik und Siedlungsdynamik. In Der Zahn der Zeit; Meyer, C., Held, P., Knipper, C., Nicklisch, N., Eds.; Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt: Halle (Saale), Germany, 2020; pp. 211–225. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bach, A.; Bach, H. Zur Anthropologie der Schnurkeramiker. In Beiträge zur Kultur und Anthropologie der Mitteldeutschen Schnurkeramiker II; Bach, A., Bach, H., Gall, W., Feustel, R., Teichert, M., Eds.; Alt-Thüringen: Weimar, Germany, 1975; Volume 13, pp. 43–107. [Google Scholar]
  91. Holtfreter, J. Zur Anthropologie der Aunjetitzer des Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebietes. In Paläanthropologie im Mittelelbe-Saale-Werra-Gebiet; Feustel, R., Ed.; Weimarer Monographien zur Ur-und Frühgeschichte: Weimar, Germany, 1989; Volume 23, pp. 105–132. [Google Scholar]
  92. Münster, A.; Knipper, C.; Oelze, V.M.; Nicklisch, N.; Stecher, M.; Schlenker, B.; Ganslmeier, R.; Fragata, M.; Friederich, S.; Dresely, V.; et al. 4000 years of human dietary evolution in central Germany, from the first farmers to the first elites. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the three sites in the Middle Elbe-Saale region, Saxony-Anhalt, central Germany (LDA, Halle/Saale).
Figure 1. Location of the three sites in the Middle Elbe-Saale region, Saxony-Anhalt, central Germany (LDA, Halle/Saale).
Nutrients 14 01831 g001
Figure 2. Scatterplot showing the significant relationship between the mean estimates of age in years and the percentage of caries per individual.
Figure 2. Scatterplot showing the significant relationship between the mean estimates of age in years and the percentage of caries per individual.
Nutrients 14 01831 g002
Figure 3. (ad). Dentition of an adult male individual (ID 484) from DEB (a) In the upper molars (teeth 16, 26, 27), the carious lesions appear to originate in the interdental spaces (approximal caries; red rectangles). (b) In the two premolars (teeth 15, 44) in the right upper and lower jaw (white arrows), the crowns are destroyed, and the origin of the carious lesion cannot be reconstructed. The area around the first mandibular premolar (tooth 44) shows traces of an abscess (black arrows). (c) Dental wear is particularly pronounced in the anterior dentition. Incisors and canines of both maxilla and mandible show formation of secondary dentin (cf. (a)). (d) There is evidence of periapical changes on molars 26 and 27. Teeth 33, 36, and 47 were taken for DNA analyses, tooth 14 was lost post-mortem (DEB 484, 35–45 years, male).
Figure 3. (ad). Dentition of an adult male individual (ID 484) from DEB (a) In the upper molars (teeth 16, 26, 27), the carious lesions appear to originate in the interdental spaces (approximal caries; red rectangles). (b) In the two premolars (teeth 15, 44) in the right upper and lower jaw (white arrows), the crowns are destroyed, and the origin of the carious lesion cannot be reconstructed. The area around the first mandibular premolar (tooth 44) shows traces of an abscess (black arrows). (c) Dental wear is particularly pronounced in the anterior dentition. Incisors and canines of both maxilla and mandible show formation of secondary dentin (cf. (a)). (d) There is evidence of periapical changes on molars 26 and 27. Teeth 33, 36, and 47 were taken for DNA analyses, tooth 14 was lost post-mortem (DEB 484, 35–45 years, male).
Nutrients 14 01831 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) The DVT images show that the dental cavities in some teeth (red rectangles) have led to periapical changes in the bone (white arrows): (a) in the left maxilla, the second molar (tooth 27) is affected; (b) in the right maxilla, there is a small lesion on the second premolar (tooth 15); and on the canine of the left mandible (tooth 33), there is a larger cavity that can be identified as a possible cyst due to its size. The latter has led to a vestibular abscess (cf. (b); DEB 484, 35–45 years, male).
Figure 4. (a,b) The DVT images show that the dental cavities in some teeth (red rectangles) have led to periapical changes in the bone (white arrows): (a) in the left maxilla, the second molar (tooth 27) is affected; (b) in the right maxilla, there is a small lesion on the second premolar (tooth 15); and on the canine of the left mandible (tooth 33), there is a larger cavity that can be identified as a possible cyst due to its size. The latter has led to a vestibular abscess (cf. (b); DEB 484, 35–45 years, male).
Nutrients 14 01831 g004
Table 1. Archeological sites, number (N) of excavated individuals separated in adults and subadults, and number of individuals with preserved teeth separated in adults and subadults.
Table 1. Archeological sites, number (N) of excavated individuals separated in adults and subadults, and number of individuals with preserved teeth separated in adults and subadults.
Archeological SitesN Excavated IndividualsN AdultsN SubadultsN Individuals with TeethN Adults with TeethN Subadults with Teeth
DEB473215402812
HBS381820331716
KAR312011281810
Total11670461016338
Table 2. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) in adult and subadult individuals for each site and in total. Information on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries is given by adult individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
Table 2. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) in adult and subadult individuals for each site and in total. Information on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries is given by adult individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
SiteAdultsSubadults
IndividualsCF %IndividualsCF %
DEB18/2864.32/1216.7
HBS12/1770.62/1612.5
KAR13/1872.23/1030.0
total43/6368.37/3818.4
TeethCE %TeethCE %
DEB52/5948.84/2551.6
HBS49/40912.04/2811.4
KAR52/47710.95/1712.9
total153/148010.313/7071.8
Adults with AMTL
AMTL by individuals%AMTL by alveolar sockets%
DEB5/2817.99/6251.4
HBS3/1717.623/4535.1
KAR6/1833.323/5174.4
total14/6322.255/15953.4
AMTL + caries by individuals%AMTL + caries by
alveolar sockets
%
DEB19/2867.961/6259.8
HBS12/1770.672/45315.9
KAR14/1877.875/51714.5
total45/6371.4208/159513.0
Table 3. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) in subadult and adult individuals from all sites by age group, with data on permanent teeth and deciduous teeth affected. Data on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries are given by adult individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
Table 3. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) in subadult and adult individuals from all sites by age group, with data on permanent teeth and deciduous teeth affected. Data on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries are given by adult individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
Age (Years)Indidviduals%Permanent Teeth/Alveolar Sockets%Deciduous Teeth%
Caries (CF)Caries by teeth (CE)
0–60/190.00/1050.00/1880.0
7–145/1338.52/1941.08/879.2
15–202/633.33/1312.30/20.0
21–4022/3759.575/8738.6------
41–6020/2580.066/58611.3------
>611/110012/2157.1------
AMTLAMTL by alveolar sockets
21–403/378.113/9171.4------
41–6010/2540.037/6525.7------
>611/11005/2619.2------
all adults14/6322.255/15953.4------
AMTL + cariesAMTL + caries by
alveolar sockets
21–4022/3759.588/9179.6------
41–6022/2584.0103/65215.8------
>611/110017/2665.4------
all adults45/6371.4208/159513.0------
Table 4. Sex-specific differences in caries frequency (CF), caries experience (CE). Data on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries are given by individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
Table 4. Sex-specific differences in caries frequency (CF), caries experience (CE). Data on AMTL and AMTL combined with caries are given by individuals and assessable alveolar sockets.
SiteMale%Female%Male%Female%
Caries by individuals (CF)Caries by teeth (CE)
DEB4/1040.013/1681.313/2215.938/36510.4
HBS6/61006/1154.524/17513.727/23411.5
KAR7/1163.65/683.314/2854.935/16221.6
Total17/2763.024/3372.751/6827.5100/76113.1
AMTL by individualsAMTL by alveolar sockets
DEB0/100.05/1631.20/2240.09/3932.3
HBS1/616.72/1118.26/1853.217/2686.3
KAR3/1127.33/650.012/3133.811/1746.3
Total4/2714.810/3330.318/7222.537/8354.4
AMTL + caries by individualsAMTL + caries by alveolar sockets
DEB4/1040.014/1687.513/2245.847/39312.0
HBS6/61006/1154.528/18515.144/26816.4
KAR8/1172.75/683.326/3138.346/17426.4
Total18/2766.725/3375.767/7229.3137/83516.4
Table 5. Distribution of carious lesions in the dentition of adult individuals from all sites with information on the number of assessable (N teeth) and carious teeth (N affected). The teeth were named according to the FDI system.
Table 5. Distribution of carious lesions in the dentition of adult individuals from all sites with information on the number of assessable (N teeth) and carious teeth (N affected). The teeth were named according to the FDI system.
Right JawLeft Jaw
Upper Jaw18171615141312112122232425262728
N teeth31494949495144424547474751484827
N affected47111084211122611165
% affected12.914.322.420.416.37.84.52.42.22.14.34.311.822.933.318.5
Lower Jaw48474645444342413132333435363738
N teeth35504951485147454047495153495140
N affected6775210101114998
% affected17.114.014.39.84.22.00.02.20.02.12.02.07.518.417.620.0
Table 6. Degree of caries in adult individuals: number of affected teeth (N teeth) by severity of carious lesion (grade 1–5).
Table 6. Degree of caries in adult individuals: number of affected teeth (N teeth) by severity of carious lesion (grade 1–5).
GradeDEBHBSKARTotal
N Teeth%N Teeth%N Teeth%N Teeth%
11121.22040.81936.55032.7
22446.2918.4917.34227.5
335.8714.31019.22013.1
41325.036.135.81912.4
511.91020.41121.22214.4
Total521004910052100153100
Table 7. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) amongst adult and subadult individuals compared to other Neolithic and Early Bronze Age datasets from the MES region, Germany.
Table 7. Caries frequency (CF) and caries experience (CE) amongst adult and subadult individuals compared to other Neolithic and Early Bronze Age datasets from the MES region, Germany.
Period/SiteCF %CE %References
SubadultAdultSubadultAdult
DEB26.764.3/69.9 **1.68.8/9.8 **this study
HBS12.570.6/70.6 **1.412.0/15.9 **this study
KAR30.072.2/77.8 **2.910.9/14.5 **this study
All sites18.468.3/71.4 **1.2/2.9 *10.3/13.0 **this study
BK/Wandersleben (MES)---63.8---14.4[85] **
BK/Wandersleben (MES)12.5---3.2/0.0 *---[88]
BK/Sondershausen (MES)---69.0---11.8[83] **
BK/collection---58.1---11.3[84]
LBK/Aiterhofen (SB)36.8---5.4/2.8 *---[88]
LBK/Aiterhofen (SB)---37.0---9.2[86]
LBK/Kleinhadersdorf (LA)---60.74.9/2.0 *7.3[87]
MN/collection (MES)8.044.01.34.9[17]
LN/collection (MES)9.838.30.95.5[17]
LN/collection (MES)---36.4---6.0[90] **
EBA/collection (MES)11.435.60.95.8[17]
EBA/collection (MES)---38.3---6.9[91] **
* deciduous teeth/permanent teeth; ** ante-mortem tooth loss included; BK (Bandkeramik, c. 5700–4100 BC), MN (Middle Neolithic, 3950–3025 cal BC), LN (Late Neolithic, 2800–2050 cal BC), EBA (Early Bronze Age, 2200–1575 cal BC); SB (Southern Bavaria, Germany), LA (Lower Austria).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nicklisch, N.; Oelze, V.M.; Schierz, O.; Meller, H.; Alt, K.W. A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091831

AMA Style

Nicklisch N, Oelze VM, Schierz O, Meller H, Alt KW. A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany. Nutrients. 2022; 14(9):1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nicklisch, Nicole, Vicky M. Oelze, Oliver Schierz, Harald Meller, and Kurt W. Alt. 2022. "A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany" Nutrients 14, no. 9: 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091831

APA Style

Nicklisch, N., Oelze, V. M., Schierz, O., Meller, H., & Alt, K. W. (2022). A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany. Nutrients, 14(9), 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop