Next Article in Journal
Do Probiotics in Pregnancy Reduce Allergies and Asthma in Infancy and Childhood? A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Critical Role of Maternal Selenium Nutrition in Neurodevelopment: Effects on Offspring Behavior and Neuroinflammatory Profile
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phase Angle and Handgrip Strength as a Predictor of Disease-Related Malnutrition in Admitted Patients: 12-Month Mortality

Nutrients 2022, 14(9), 1851; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091851
by Rocío Fernández-Jiménez 1,2,3,*, Lara Dalla-Rovere 1, María García-Olivares 1,3,4, José Abuín-Fernández 1, Francisco José Sánchez-Torralvo 3,4,5, Viyey Kishore Doulatram-Gamgaram 3,4,5, Agustín M. Hernández-Sanchez 6 and José Manuel García-Almeida 1,2,3,5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(9), 1851; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091851
Submission received: 15 March 2022 / Revised: 17 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Nutrition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well motivated and well written.

There are some points which must be address before publication.

1-The kaplane meier product limit estimator is used to measure fraction of patient after treatment but you are assessing it on the admitted patient 24-48 hours. How do you estimate share your data with R codes.

2-A sample is taken and assessed within 24-48 hours is it count in long stay if no/yes, then how can you judge follow-up patient. If you have data of follow up patient also share it kindly.

3-By using malnutrition screening tool (MUST) and subjective global assessment (SGA) all factors is used in your study?? If yes/no, then which criteria is use for including excluding dependent/independent variables and why?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

As you stated, the identification of malnutrition in the hospital setting is an important issue and there continues to be a dearth of effective malnutrition  screening tools. This is an excellent paper, well-written and of clinical and scientific importance.

I have minor comments only:

Table 1:  What is "VSG"? Should this be "SGA" since SGA doesn't appear in the table but is included in the footnote? Also, recheck the results described in lines 181-184. Those numbers and %'s don't exactly match the results listed in Table 1.

Line 204, the number is stated incorrectly

Appendix A:  Wording can be improved for some of the descriptions; confirm the n listed in the bottom right box is correct or explain it differently (i.e. 631-115 doesn't = 570)

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop