Next Article in Journal
Nutritional Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery—A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Association of Vitamin D Levels and Dental Caries in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Microscopic Colitis and Celiac Disease: Sharing More than a Diagnostic Overlap
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility of Oral Function Evaluation According to Dementia Severity in Older Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Longitudinal Relationship between Edentulism and the Progress of Multimorbidity

by
Rolla Mira
,
Jonathon Timothy Newton
and
Wael Sabbah
*
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(14), 2234; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142234
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 11 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Health and Nutrition in Older Adults)

Abstract

:
Objectives: To examine the longitudinal relationship between edentulism, nutritional intake, and the progress of multimorbidity among older Americans. Methods: We used data from the Health and Retirement Study (2006–2018), a longitudinal survey of older Americans that has collected data biennially since 1992. Edentulism was assessed in 2006 while nutritional intake was assessed in 2013. Multimorbidity was indicated by five self-reported chronic conditions: diabetes, heart conditions, lung diseases, cancer, and stroke. Individuals with two or more conditions at baseline were excluded from the analysis. Nutritional intake was calculated by summing 10 nutrients (protein, vitamins C, D, B12 and E, calcium, zinc, polyunsaturated fatty acids, folate, and ß-carotene). Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to examine the nutritional pathway between edentulism (2006) and the increase in multimorbidity from 2006 to 2018. Results: The number of individuals included in the analysis was 3463. The incidence of multimorbidity between 2006 and 2018 was 24.07%, while the percentage of edentate participants in 2006 was 16.42%. The mean total nutrition in 2013 was 4.50 (4.43, 4.55). The SEM analysis showed that edentulism was negatively associated with nutritional intake {estimate −0.15 (95%CI: −0.30, −0.01)}. A negative association was found between total nutrition and multimorbidity {estimate −0.008 (95%CI: −0.01, −0.002)}. Age, wealth, and smoking were included in the analysis and had statistically significant associations with multimorbidity. Conclusion: The analysis demonstrated a longitudinal association between edentulism, nutritional intake, and the progress of multimorbidity.

1. Introduction

The elderly population of the world is rapidly expanding [1]. According to the WHO, one in six individuals on the planet will be 60 years of age or older by 2030 [2]. At this point, there will be 1.4 billion people over the age of 60, up from 1 billion in 2020. The number of individuals in the world who are 60 or older is expected to double (to 2.1 billion) by 2050. It is anticipated that between 2020 and 2050, the number of people 80 years of age or older will triple, reaching 426 million [2]. Furthermore, the development of multimorbidity is significantly influenced by ageing, with a frequency in older adults ranging from 55 to 98% [3]. Multimorbidity is known as the existence of two or more chronic diseases in one person. Because of its negative effects on health and society, multimorbidity is becoming a major healthcare concern [4,5]. Approximately 45% of Americans, or 133 million people, have at least one chronic illness, and the percentage is rising [6]. Hospitalisation, long-term impairment, lower quality of life, and even mortality can result from chronic diseases, which include cancer, diabetes, hypertension, stroke, heart disease, respiratory disorders, obesity, arthritis, and oral diseases [7].
Tooth loss is a significant global public health issue [8]. Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), one in six persons aged 65 years and older in the USA are edentulous [9]. Moreover, in the United States, half of all individuals between the ages of 20 and 64 have experienced at least one case of permanent tooth loss [10]. Furthermore, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2009 to 2014 revealed that 6.2 million Americans aged 50 and older, 17.6% of adults aged 65 and older, and 22.5% of those aged 75 and older in the US were affected by edentulism [11].
The dental and medical fields have mostly acknowledged the oral–systemic relationship in recent years. New research has been conducted and continues to demonstrate the relationship between dental and systemic health. For instance, the primary cause of tooth loss, periodontal disease, was linked via the inflammatory process to several systemic disorders [12,13,14].
Furthermore, in terms of individual chronic conditions, tooth loss was associated with certain chronic conditions such as diabetes [15] and cardiovascular diseases [16], while in terms of multimorbidity, Felton [17] found a significant association between tooth loss and multimorbidity.
Besides multimorbidity, tooth loss negatively affects people’s dietary intake. Being edentate was significantly associated with a lower consumption of dietary fibre, vitamin C, and other nutrients [18,19]. Moreover, two studies found associations between tooth loss, obesity, and malnutrition [20,21]. On the other hand, inadequate nutrition is an important determinant of multimorbidity [22,23].
People who have lost all of their teeth may experience low self-esteem and social isolation as a result of their inability to communicate and engage with others in daily life [24]. Common risk factors, such as dietary deficiencies, alcoholism, and smoking, which are all connected to low socioeconomic status, may have an impact on the association between tooth loss and multimorbidity [25,26].
The current study aims to examine the relationship between edentulism, nutritional intake, and the progress of multimorbidity among older Americans.

2. Study Design

Longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were used in this study. With response rates consistently above 80%, data were collected every two years since 1992. Participants received study materials prior to each interview. Oral consent was obtained right before each interview, and participants were given a confidentiality statement. Since 2006, half of the panel respondents have additionally participated in an upgraded face-to-face interview. Data collection was conducted by a researcher employed by the HRS. The questionnaires were standardised to reduce risk of bias. The current work did not require ethical approval because the HRS data are publicly accessible and do not contain personal information.

2.1. Study Sample

Adult Americans 50 years of age and older made up the study sample [27]. Since the introduction of the oral health question started in 2006, data from that year were included in the current analysis. Inclusion criteria included: those over 50 years who responded to the oral health question in 2006, had no more than one chronic condition in 2006, and took part in the 2013 nutritional module. Individuals who lacked complete data for any of the characteristics covered in each wave were not included in the analysis.

2.2. Study Variables

The predictor variables for this study were divided into three main categories: demographic factors, health-related behaviours, and socioeconomic factors. The demographic variables were gender (male, female) and age, whereas socioeconomic position (SEP) was indicated by total wealth and its measures were reported in nominal dollars and calculated as the sum of the appropriate wealth components minus debt. In this analysis we used wealth in 2006 and categorised it into quartiles (highest, second highest, second lowest, and lowest).
Smoking in 2006 was selected as a behavioural factor, and it was categorised as a dichotomous variable (never/former smoker and current smoker).
Complete tooth loss (edentulism) in 2006 was indicated by answering “yes” to the question “Have you lost all your upper and lower natural permanent teeth?”.
The Health and Retirement Study included one file where individual nutritional intake was calculated in 2013. This wave is called the Health Care and Nutrition Study (HCNS) 2013. Individual intake was calculated according to the values of nutrient recommendations: dietary reference intake (DRI). According to the available nutrients in the HRS, only 10 out of 13 nutrients of the US Food and Drug Administration were chosen: protein, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin B12, vitamin E, calcium, zinc, polyunsaturated fatty acids, folate, and ß-carotene. These nutrients were calculated based on the DRI [28] as the following: protein (men < 56 g/day; women < 46 g/day); vitamin C (men 90 mg/day; women 75 mg/day); vitamin D (both 50–70 years, 15 µg/day; both >70 years, 20 µg/day—the HRS calculated vitamin D in international units, which contradicted the US Food and Drug Administration, who calculated it in micrograms, so there are two measures for vitamin D according to age. Based on this, a convertor was used to accurately measure the values, yielding 15 IU = 600 and 20 IU = 800); vitamin B12 (<2.4 µg/day); vitamin E (15 mg/day); zinc (men < 11 mg/day; women < 8 mg/day); polyunsaturated fatty acids (men 160 mg; women 90 mg); folate (<400 µg/day); ß-carotene (3 mg).
Each of these nutrients was coded as 0 = inadequate intake or 1 = adequate intake and were summed up in one variable, total nutrients, ranging from 0 to 10.
Multimorbidity was indicated by self-reported diagnoses of five chronic conditions: diabetes, heart conditions, lung diseases, cancer, and stroke. These conditions were selected because they are highly prevalent among older adults and are classified as major causes of disability and death in the USA [9]. In this analysis, multimorbidity in 2018 was used as a dichotomous variable: 1 or fewer condition versus 2 or more conditions. Participants with more than 1 chronic condition at baseline (2006) were excluded from the analysis.
The final analysis included data on multimorbidity, tooth loss, nutritional intake, wealth, smoking, age, and gender. These data were from Health and Retirement Survey, specifically from RAND HRS Longitudinal File 2018 (V1).
This study was human observational and followed properly the STROBE guidelines.

3. Statistical Analysis

The incidence of multimorbidity among older Americans aged 50 years and over in 2018 was included. The prevalence of edentulism in 2006 and the mean total nutrition (2013) were also included. The analysis was limited to people with complete data. The variable with most missing cases was nutrition since it was obtained from a one-off survey of a subsample of the HRS.
First, we assessed the distribution of multimorbidity (2018), tooth loss (2006), and total nutrition (2013). We also assessed tooth loss in 2012 and 2018; however, they were not included in the analysis as tooth loss in 2012 is unlikely to have an impact on nutrition in 2013, and the tooth loss in 2018 occurred after nutritional assessment in 2013.
To test the relationship between total tooth loss and multimorbidity through nutritional intake, structure equation modelling (SEM) was used. One path analysis diagram was created with multiple adjustments. The following associations were tested: (1) associations of wealth and smoking with tooth loss adjusting for age and gender; (2) association between tooth loss and total nutrition adjusting for age and gender; (3) associations between total nutrition and multimorbidity adjusting for smoking, wealth, and age. All analyses were conducted using Stata 14.2

4. Results

The analysis included 3463 participants. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the number of eligible participants from 2006 to 2018. The incidence of multimorbidity in 2018 was 24.07%. The percentage of participants with complete tooth loss in 2006 was 10.11%. The mean total nutrition in 2013 was 4.50 (95%CI: 4.43, 4.55) (Table 1). In 2012 and 2018, the percentages of edentates were 12.5% and 16.7%, respectively. Figure 2 demonstrates the direction of association between tooth loss in 2006, total nutrition in 2013, and multimorbidity in 2018. Those who lost all their teeth in 2006 had a significantly lower score of adequate nutrition in 2013 {estimate −0.15 (95%CI: −0.30, −0.01)}. A negative association was observed between adequate nutrition in 2013 and multimorbidity {estimate −0.008 (95%CI: −0.01, −0.002)} after accounting for smoking and wealth (Table 2).

5. Discussion

In this study, we examined the relationship between edentulism and progress of multimorbidity among older adults in the United States using longitudinal data from the HRS and examined the role of nutritional intake in this relation. The analysis using SEM demonstrated that nutritional intake is in the pathway between edentulism and multimorbidity. Tooth loss in 2006 was negatively associated with adequate total nutritional in 2013, which in turn was negatively associated with the incidence of multimorbidity in 2018. These results were consistent with previous studies reporting that tooth loss was associated with declines in fruit, vegetable, and fibre consumption, which in turn influenced the risk of chronic conditions [29,30].
Tooth loss affects chewing ability and limits the selection of food items, which impacts the adequate intake of essential nutrients [18,19]. For example, older adults with fewer teeth or no teeth will have difficulties eating fresh fruits and vegetables and could consume other unhealthy food [18,31]. While this relationship was always clear when tooth loss was indicated by a number of teeth or functional dentition, it was less clear when complete edentulism was used; however, this was mainly attributed to the lack of longitudinal studies [21]. The current analysis found a longitudinal association between complete tooth loss and inadequate nutritional intake. On the other hand, there is evidence of a consistent relationship between inadequate nutrition and a higher incidence of multimorbidity and comorbidity [22,23]. The impact of nutrition on the onset and management of chronic illnesses has been widely acknowledged [23], which has led to recommendations for food consumption based on daily reference intakes for particular macro- and micronutrients [22]. The findings of the current analysis highlight the role of adequate nutritional intake in the progress of multimorbidity even after accounting for other behavioural and socioeconomic factors.
In this study, we did not test the direct relationship between tooth loss in 2006 and incidence multimorbidity in 2018 as the focus of the research question was on demonstrating the indirect relation through inadequate nutritional intake. However, there are several studies that demonstrated association between tooth loss and multimorbidity [32], and between tooth loss and individual chronic conditions [16,20,33,34]. It is worth noting that in the studied sample, complete tooth loss slightly increased in 2012 and 2018, but there was no point in including tooth loss in these two waves in the analysis as there would be a very short time span to show the impact of tooth loss in 2012 on nutritional intake in 2013. Furthermore, tooth loss in 2018 occurred after the nutritional assessment.
While the nutritional pathway between tooth loss and multimorbidity was tested in this study, there are other pathways for this relationship, including a psychological pathway due to the impact of tooth loss on talking and socialising with others, which could lead to social isolation [35], impacting multimorbidity. Adverse socioeconomic factors and associated risk behaviours could also have a common impact on tooth loss and multimorbidity [11,36].
The strength of this study is in using longitudinal data of older American adults to assess the relationship between tooth loss, nutritional intake, and multimorbidity, and in using structural equation modelling to demonstrate the nutritional pathway. The nutritional intake variable was based on the recommendations for essential nutrient intake, which affects chronic conditions. The focus on the progress of multimorbidity and tooth loss, both common public health problems in the ageing population, is another strength of this analysis. There are a few limitations worth mentioning. First, we used self-reported doctor diagnoses of chronic conditions, which could be subject to recall bias. However, including clinical assessments is very difficult and expensive in longitudinal studies of this size. Oral health was limited to self-reported complete tooth loss, which is also subject to recall bias. Furthermore, there were data on the use of dentures, or the condition of dentures, which could affect the ability to eat in this analysis. A better indicator of oral health would have been to include the number of teeth or functional dentition and the use of dentures. However, we made the best use of the available longitudinal data, which included repeated measures of comprehensive medical data to demonstrate the longitudinal association between tooth loss, nutritional intake and the incidence of multimorbidity. Finally, there were some attritions of the sample, but this is common in surveys of older adults, which included data collected over 12 years. Furthermore, most of the exclusion was due to a lack of data on nutrition, which was collected from a subsample of the population.
The findings of this study on the impact of tooth loss on nutritional intake and the progress of multimorbidity highlight the importance of identifying health promotion interventions to improve oral health and nutritional intake to halt the progress of multimorbidity among older adults. Future research should include an intervention study design to examine the relationship demonstrated in this study.

6. Conclusions

This study demonstrated a longitudinal association between tooth loss and inadequate nutritional intake and between nutritional intake and the progress of multimorbidity, using a national longitudinal survey of older American adults. The study highlights the importance of both oral health and nutritional intake in the progress of multimorbidity among older American adults.

Author Contributions

R.M.: conception of the idea, data management, data analysis, interpretation of results, and writing manuscript draft; W.S.: conception of the idea, data analysis, and writing final manuscript; J.T.N.: conception of the idea and writing final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this study is available in: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about accessed on 5 June 2024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sanderson, W.C.; Scherbov, S. Measuring the speed of aging across population subgroups. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. WHO. Ageing and Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 28 November 2023).
  3. Marengoni, A.; Angleman, S.; Melis, R.; Mangialasche, F.; Karp, A.; Garmen, A.; Meinow, B.; Fratiglioni, L. Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res. Rev. 2011, 10, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Le Reste, J.Y.; Nabbe, P.; Manceau, B.; Lygidakis, C.; Doerr, C.; Lingner, H.; Czachowski, S.; Munoz, M.; Argyriadou, S.; Claveria, A. The European General Practice Research Network presents a comprehensive definition of multimorbidity in family medicine and long term care, following a systematic review of relevant literature. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013, 14, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sevostyanova, E.; YuA, N.; VYa, P. The problem of multimorbidity in a modern therapeutic clinic. Bull. Sib. Med. 2022, 21, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tinker, A. How to improve patient outcomes for chronic diseases and comorbidities. Health Catal. 2017. Available online: http://www.healthcatalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/How-to-Improve-Patient-Outcomes.pdf (accessed on 9 July 2024).
  7. Raghupathi, W.; Raghupathi, V. An empirical study of chronic diseases in the United States: A visual analytics approach to public health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bernabe, E.; Marcenes, W.; Hernandez, C.R.; Bailey, J.; Abreu, L.G.; Alipour, V.; Amini, S.; Arabloo, J.; Arefi, Z.; Arora, A.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. CDC. About Chronic Diseases. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm (accessed on 3 February 2024).
  10. NIH. Tooth Loss in Adults (Age 20 to 64). Available online: https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data-statistics/tooth-loss/adults#:~:text=2.2%25%20of%20adults%2020%20to%2064%20years%20have,are%20more%20likely%20to%20have%20no%20remaining%20teeth. (accessed on 29 November 2023).
  11. Dye, B.A.; Weatherspoon, D.J.; Lopez Mitnik, G. Tooth loss among older adults according to poverty status in the United States from 1999 through 2004 and 2009 through 2014. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2019, 150, 9–23.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Genco, R.J.; Sanz, M. Clinical and public health implications of periodontal and systemic diseases: An overview. Periodontology 2000 2020, 83, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, J.; Amar, S. Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: A bidirectional relationship. Odontology 2006, 94, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Linden, G.J.; Lyons, A.; Scannapieco, F.A. Periodontal systemic associations: Review of the evidence. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, S8–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahmadinia, A.R.; Rahebi, D.; Mohammadi, M.; Ghelichi-Ghojogh, M.; Jafari, A.; Esmaielzadeh, F.; Rajabi, A. Association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and tooth loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Matsuyama, Y.; Jürges, H.; Listl, S. Causal Effect of Tooth Loss on Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Dent. Res. 2023, 102, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Felton, D.A. Complete Edentulism and Comorbid Diseases: An Update. J. Prosthodont. 2016, 25, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nowjack-Raymer, R.E.; Sheiham, A. Numbers of natural teeth, diet, and nutritional status in US adults. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 1171–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhu, Y.; Hollis, J.H. Tooth loss and its association with dietary intake and diet quality in American adults. J. Dent. 2014, 42, 1428–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nascimento, G.G.; Leite, F.R.; Conceição, D.A.; Ferrúa, C.P.; Singh, A.; Demarco, F.F. Is there a relationship between obesity and tooth loss and edentulism? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Toniazzo, M.P.; Amorim, P.S.; Muniz, F.; Weidlich, P. Relationship of nutritional status and oral health in elderly: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 37, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Koren-Hakim, T.; Weiss, A.; Hershkovitz, A.; Otzrateni, I.; Grosman, B.; Frishman, S.; Salai, M.; Beloosesky, Y. The relationship between nutritional status of hip fracture operated elderly patients and their functioning, comorbidity and outcome. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 31, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruel, G.; Shi, Z.; Zhen, S.; Zuo, H.; Kröger, E.; Sirois, C.; Lévesque, J.-F.; Taylor, A.W. Association between nutrition and the evolution of multimorbidity: The importance of fruits and vegetables and whole grain products. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gerritsen, A.E.; Allen, P.F.; Witter, D.J.; Bronkhorst, E.M.; Creugers, N.H.J. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2010, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seerig, L.M.; Nascimento, G.G.; Peres, M.A.; Horta, B.L.; Demarco, F.F. Tooth loss in adults and income: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, H.; Han, R.; Wang, Z. Socioeconomics, health-related factors, and tooth loss among the population aged over 80 years in China. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sonnega, A.; Faul, J.D.; Ofstedal, M.B.; Langa, K.M.; Phillips, J.W.; Weir, D.R. Cohort Profile: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 43, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. National Institutes of Health. Nutrient Recommendations: Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/HealthInformation/Dietary_Reference_Intakes.aspx (accessed on 13 May 2023).
  29. Hung, H.C.; Colditz, G.; Joshipura, K.J. The association between tooth loss and the self-reported intake of selected CVD-related nutrients and foods among US women. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2005, 33, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Österberg, T.; Dey, D.K.; Sundh, V.; Carlsson, G.E.; Jansson, J.-O.; Mellström, D. Edentulism associated with obesity: A study of four national surveys of 16 416 Swedes aged 55–84 years. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2010, 68, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chari, M.; Sabbah, W. The relationships among consumption of fruits, tooth loss and obesity. Community Dent. Health 2018, 35, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hag Mohamed, S.; Sabbah, W. Is tooth loss associated with multiple chronic conditions? Acta Odontol. Scand. 2023, 81, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Maweri, S.A.; Ibraheem, W.I.; Al-Ak’hali, M.S.; Shamala, A.; Halboub, E.; Alhajj, M.N. Association of periodontitis and tooth loss with liver cancer: A systematic review. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2021, 159, 103221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dioguardi, M.; Gioia, G.D.; Caloro, G.A.; Capocasale, G.; Zhurakivska, K.; Troiano, G.; Russo, L.L.; Muzio, L.L. The Association between Tooth Loss and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Case Control Studies. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kudsi, Z.; Fenlon, M.R.; Johal, A.; Baysan, A. Assessment of Psychological Disturbance in Patients with Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mira, R.; Newton, T.; Sabbah, W. Inequalities in the progress of multiple chronic conditions: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the number of participants included in the analysis from 2006 to 2018.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the number of participants included in the analysis from 2006 to 2018.
Nutrients 16 02234 g001
Figure 2. Nutritional pathway between edentulism (2006) and multimorbidity (2018). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. All associations were adjusted for age. Participants with 2 or more chronic conditions in 2006 were excluded.
Figure 2. Nutritional pathway between edentulism (2006) and multimorbidity (2018). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. All associations were adjusted for age. Participants with 2 or more chronic conditions in 2006 were excluded.
Nutrients 16 02234 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of participants, 2006–2018; distribution of variables (exposures and outcomes) (N: 3463).
Table 1. Characteristics of participants, 2006–2018; distribution of variables (exposures and outcomes) (N: 3463).
VariablesMean/Percentages
Age (mean) 163.36 (63.08, 63.65)
Gender 1Male37.79%
Female62.21%
Tooth loss in 2006 1Dentate88.98%
Edentate 10.11%
Current/former smokers 200651.8%
Wealth quartilesHighest34.9%
2nd highest29.1%
2nd lowest23.6%
Lowest12.4%
Total nutrition in 2013 (mean) 14.50 (4.43, 4.55)
Multimorbidity in 2018 21 condition75.93%
2 conditions or more24.07%
1, Exposure variables; 2, Outcome.
Table 2. Path coefficients estimated using a structural equation model for the relationship between tooth loss, nutritional intake, and multimorbidity.
Table 2. Path coefficients estimated using a structural equation model for the relationship between tooth loss, nutritional intake, and multimorbidity.
Standardised Coefficient Confidence
SmokingAge −0.01 ***−0.01, −0.02
Lower wealth 20060.03 ***0.02, 0.03
Edentulism 2006Age0.007 ***0.006, 0.008
Gender0.01−0.001, 0.02
Lower wealth 20060.08 ***0.07, 0.08
Smoking 20060.07 ***0.06, 0.08
Total nutrition 2013Age 0.01−0.01, 0.01
Gender0.37 ***0.26, 0.48
Edentulism 2006−0.15 *−0.30, −0.01
Multimorbidity 2018Age 0.008 ***0.007, 0.01
Total nutrition 2013−0.008 *−0.015, −0.002
Lower wealth 2006−0.03 ***−0.01, −0.04
Smoking 20060.08 ***0.05, 0.11
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mira, R.; Newton, J.T.; Sabbah, W. The Longitudinal Relationship between Edentulism and the Progress of Multimorbidity. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142234

AMA Style

Mira R, Newton JT, Sabbah W. The Longitudinal Relationship between Edentulism and the Progress of Multimorbidity. Nutrients. 2024; 16(14):2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mira, Rolla, Jonathon Timothy Newton, and Wael Sabbah. 2024. "The Longitudinal Relationship between Edentulism and the Progress of Multimorbidity" Nutrients 16, no. 14: 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop