Next Article in Journal
The Association between Fluoride and Bone Mineral Density in US Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
No Money No Time Culinary Nutrition Website eHealth Challenge: A Pre-Post Evaluation of Impact on Diet Quality, Food Expenditure, and Engagement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nutritional Issues in Children with Dysphagia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/nu16172949
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Study Protocol

Can Faecal Zonulin and Calprotectin Levels Be Used in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up in Infants with Milk Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis?

by
Grażyna Czaja-Bulsa
1,*,
Karolina Bulsa
2,
Monika Łokieć
3 and
Arleta Drozd
4
1
Chair and Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Nursing, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
2
Szczecin Outpatient Clinic, 71-050 Szczecin, Poland
3
Clinical Department of Paediatrics University Hospital, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
4
Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolomics, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(17), 2949; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172949
Submission received: 19 June 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 31 August 2024 / Published: 2 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Support for Pediatric Gastroenterology Patients)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate whether a 1-month-long milk-free diet results in a reduction in faecal calprotectin (FC) and faecal-zonulin-related proteins (FZRP) in children with milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (MPIAP). Materials and methods: This is a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study involving 86 infants with MPIAP, aged 1–3 months, and 30 healthy controls of the same age. The FC and FZRP were marked using the ELISA method (IDK® Calprotectin or Zonulin ELISA Kit, Immunodiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany). The diagnosis of MPIAP was confirmed with an open milk challenge test. Results: FFC and FZRP proved useful in evaluating MPIAP treatment with a milk-free diet, and the resolution of allergic symptoms and a significant (p = 0.0000) decrease in the concentrations of both biomarkers were observed after 4 weeks on the diet. The FC and FZRP concentrations were still higher than in the control group. A high variability of FC concentrations was found in all the study groups. An important limitation is the phenomenon of FZRP not being produced in all individuals, affecting one in five infants. Conclusions: FC and FZRP can be used to monitor the resolution of colitis in infants with MPIAP treated with a milk-free diet, indicating a slower resolution of allergic inflammation than of allergic symptoms. The diagnosis of MPIAP on the basis of FC concentrations is subject to considerable error, due to the high individual variability of this indicator. FZRP is a better parameter, but this needs further research, as these are the first determinations in infants with MPIAP.

1. Introduction

Cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most common food allergy in infants and children younger than 3 years of age [1,2]. Its prevalence in developed countries is estimated at 0.5–3% in the first year of life [3,4,5]. If the gastrointestinal tract is involved, it is usually a non-IgE mediated allergy (non-IgE). One of its forms is milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (MPIAP). The intestinal forms of non-IgE-CMPA cause intestinal mucositis, which is responsible for numerous symptoms.
MIAP is the most common form of FPIAP (food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis) [6]. The population prevalence in infants is approximately 1–2%, and the proportion of infants with rectal bleeding is 18–64% [7]. Affected infants are in generally good condition. Stools containing blood or blood strands usually appear during breastfeeding at 4–6 weeks of age; in some infants they can disappear spontaneously; even in a few weeks. Therefore, some researchers recommend observing the infant for 2–4 weeks without including milk-free diets [8,9]. Milk-free diets usually lead to the resolution of symptoms within 3–5 days, although in some people, the process takes several weeks [10,11,12,13]. Recent studies indicate that the majority (60%) of children with FPIAP develop tolerance to milk at around 12 months of age, although symptoms may persist up to 3 years of age [11,14]. A milk-free diet is usually maintained until the age of 12 months, when a follow-up OFC is performed to check whether milk tolerance has already developed [14]. In infants with FPIAP who underwent endoscopy, an equivocal picture was found. FPIAP is usually a patchy disease [15]. Histopathological findings are not pathognomonic of the disease [16]. Some infants have iron-deficiency anemia, and less frequent hypoalbuminemia and peripheral eosinophilia [17].
The only way to confirm the diagnosis of this type of allergy is to perform an elimination and milk challenge test, i.e., to eliminate milk from the diet, which should lead to the disappearance of symptoms, which recur when milk is reintroduced into the diet [18].
In the absence of simple diagnostic tests to confirm non-IgE CMPA, there has been increasing interest over the years in various faecal biomarkers used to diagnose and control the course of gastrointestinal allergic diseases. The first to be investigated was faecal calprotectin (FC), which is an indicator of intestinal mucositis in other diseases. The first study, conducted by Waligura-Dupriet at al. in 2011, reported that the concentrations of FC in infants with food allergies were two-fold higher [19]. Subsequent studies have confirmed significant variability in FC concentrations in healthy infants, as well as in infants with CMPA, indicating the need for further research [20].
Faecal-zonulin-related proteins (FZRPs) may be new non-invasive markers for the presence of food allergies. There is a family of structurally and functionally related proteins called zonulin-related proteins (ZRP) [21]. Higher FZRP activity can increase the passage of antigens through the paracellular pathway of the intestinal epithelium, which can lead to the abolition of immune tolerance, i.e., the onset of a food allergy [10]. Through tight intercellular junctions, the intestinal epithelial barrier, together with the intestinal lymphoid tissue and neuroendocrine network, can control the balance between tolerance and allergy to antigens other than one’s own. FZRPs are the physiological modulators of intercellular tight junctions. Their activity can significantly affect the occurrence of either food tolerance or allergies [22,23]. FZPR secretion has been shown to be regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-6 [24]. These scientific data suggest that FZRP may be used as a marker for diseases associated with inflammation in the gut and the development of food allergies.
The aim of our study was to investigate whether a 1-month-long milk-free diet in infants with MPIAP results in a reduction in faecal FC and FZRP.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a single-center prospective observational cohort study of 86 children with MPIAP, with a median age of 2 months (1–3 months), and 30 healthy controls, who were examined for faecal CF and FZRP. The study and control groups did not differ when it came to age, sex, weight and height, family history of allergic diseases, and feeding method at the time of diagnosis. They differed only in the prevalence of general symptoms, such as anxiety and anaemia, which were more common in children with MPIAP. Detailed characteristics of the study and control groups are given in Table 1.
This prospective study was conducted for 2 years (2020–2022). The infants were patients at the Outpatient Clinic for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Allergology in Szczecin. The patients lived in the West Pomeranian region and were selected from among children with symptoms indicative of CMPA—diarrhoea with blood or blood strands. Some infants also had atopic dermatitis.
All infants examined were in good general condition, with normal weight and height (10c–97c). The diagnostic diagram is shown in Scheme 1.
In 98 infants with complete or significant improvement during treatment with a milk-free diet, an open oral food challenge test (OFC) with milk was performed. A positive OFC was the basis for the diagnosis of CMPA. A negative provocation test ruled out the presence of CMPA. All infants developed symptoms 8 h to 3 days after milk consumption. Infants with delayed reactions during OFC were diagnosed with non-IgE CMPA, and with MPIAP due to presenting symptoms. OFC was positive in 86 infants who were included in the study group (MPIAP0 group). The first stool sample for the determination of FC and FZRP was taken immediately before the introduction of the milk-free diet (FC0, FZRP0), and the second was taken after 4 weeks of the diet (FC1, FZRP1) (Scheme 1).
During the diagnostic elimination diet and subsequent treatment of MPIAP, a milk-free diet was used: either milk from mothers remaining on a milk-free diet, extensively hydrolysed cow’s milk formula (eHF), or mixed feeding (breast and eHF). No infants were on an elementary diet (AAF—free amino acids formulae) (Table 1).
Each patient had a medical and allergological history taken (in which recurrent adverse reactions were recorded) and went through physical examination (current MPIAP symptoms). The criteria for including a child in the study were the presence of MPIAP, cow’s-milk-only-dependent symptoms, age (up to 4 months), no coexisting chronic diseases (except atopic dermatitis, as a form of CMPA), and written consent from the parents/legal guardians for the child to participate in the controlled study. Consent also included permission to store and publish the collected data. Exclusion criteria were as follows: another form of non-IgE-CMPA, coexistence of MPIAP with other chronic diseases, age above 4 months, and lack of written consent from parents/guardians for the child’s participation in the controlled study.
Children in the study group at the time of MPIAP diagnosis were designated as group MPIAP0, and assessed after one month of treatment with a milk-free diet as group MPIAP1.
The age of MPIAP diagnosis was the age when a diagnostic milk-free diet was introduced. The diagnosis of MPIAP (FPIAP) was given according to the recommendations of the WAO and EAACI [25,26].
The research was approved by the PUM Bioethics Committee, No. KB-0012/5/20. The research was financed by statutory activities (WNoZ-319-01/s/12/2020-2022). The presented results are part of the ongoing project.

2.1. OFC Procedures

OFC procedures were always initiated in an outpatient setting, under the supervision of a nurse and/or doctor, with access to anti-shock medication. These were provocations performed with the usage of an open method [27]. After a negative lip test (a drop of milk), gradually, higher doses of milk were administered every 15 min (1 mL, 2 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL, 20 mL, 50 mL, and up to 100 mL). Patients remained under observation for at least 2 h (usually 4–6 h) from the end of OFC [27,28,29] The provocation was continued at home for another 6 days. Every day, parents administered the milk mixture corresponding in volume to one meal (up to 120 mL), and the information about possible adverse reactions was recorded in the observation card. After 6 days (or earlier, if side effects had occurred), the doctor examined the OFC outcome. In the study, results of 86 milk OFCs were analysed.

2.2. Faecal Samples

The first stool sample was taken immediately before the introduction of the milk-free diet (FC0, FZRP0), and the other after 4 weeks of the diet, when the symptoms had disappeared or decreased (FC1, FZRP1) (Scheme 1). Raw stool samples from all children were frozen and stored at −80 °C. All patients provided a stool specimen the day before their visit to the outpatient clinic.
The FC was determined using the ELISA method (IDK® Calprotectin ELISA Kit, Immunodiagnostik AG, 64625 Bensheim, Germany). The FC results were given in µg/mL. According to the manufacturer, the normal range for FC was set at <50 µg/g for adults and children over 4 years of age. Values of 50–100 µg/g are regarded as borderline and >100 µg/g as positive. The company did not specify a reference range for younger children [8].
The FZRP was also assessed with the use of the ELISA method (IDK® Zonulin ELISA Kit, Immunodiagnostik AG, Germany). The manufacturer indicates that the correct median concentration of FFRZ is 61 ng/mL. The manufacturer states that the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.4%, and 13.3%, respectively.
Olafsdottir et al. showed that stool collected from the nappy had a 30% higher FC concentration due to water absorption [18]. In all infants, stools were collected in the same way (from the nappy) for the determination of FC and FZRP.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All data were collected in electronic form in MS Excel spreadsheet and were subjected to statistical analysis. Continuous variables were described by median, minimum, and maximum values. Discontinuous variables were described by number and frequency of occurrence. Pearson’s χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test and Spearman’s rank correlation were used to test statistical relationships between discontinuous variables.
Probability p was calculated with two tests: Mann–Whitney U-test for variables, for which the normality of the distributions was not satisfied, and the Student’s t-test for variables with a normal distribution.
In the search for the FC concentration that differentiates healthy children (control group) from children diagnosed with MPIAP best (MPIAP0 group), ROC curve analysis was used. The results were described by the area under the curve (AUC), the standard error of the AUC (SE), the 95% confidence interval for the AUC (95% CI), the p-likelihood, and the coordinates of the ROC curves, i.e., the sensitivity and specificity of the study group relative to the control group were estimated for each range of values of the continuous variable.

3. Results

3.1. Faecal Calprotectin (FC)

The median FC concentration in children in the control group was 113.25 mg/L (13.9–219.9 mg/L) (Table 2). It was significantly lower (p = 0.0000) than in the children in the study group at the time of MPIAP diagnosis (MPIAP0), 382.9 mg/L (103.5–822.8 mg/L), and in the children in the study group after 4 weeks of treatment with a milk-free diet (MPIAP1) 208.4 mg/L (67.9–484.4 mg/L) (p < 0.0001). At this time, the children’s CMPA complaints (MPIAP and atopic dermatitis) had resolved. On a milk-free diet, the FC concentrations decreased significantly in each infant (Figure 1).
The FC concentrations differed significantly between the children in the MPIAP1 and MPIAP0 groups (p < 0.0001) and were correlated positively (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001). High variability in the faecal FC concentration was found in all the study groups (control group, and MPIAP0 and MPIAP1 groups) (Figure 1).
In the search for the FC concentration that differentiated the healthy children (control group) from the children diagnosed with MPIAP best (MPIAP0 group), a ROC curve analysis was used. It was found that the FC concentration > 193.75 mg/L for the MPIAP0 group (with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 89%) distinguished it from the infants from the control group in the best way (FC < 193.75 mg/L). Lower values were found in 96.7% of the children in the control group, with values equal or higher in 91.9% of the children in the MPIAP0 group and 61.6% of the children in the MPIAP1 group (Table 3).
In all the study groups, the level of FC did not depend on gender, family history of allergy, or the type of feeding (breast, modified milk, mixed diet).

3.2. Faecal-Zonulin-Related Proteins (FZRP)

The median FZRP concentration in the children in the control group was 54.1 ng/mL, and the range was 36.6–101.9 ng/mL (Table 2). It was significantly lower (p = 0.000) than in the children in the study group at the time of MPIAP diagnosis (MPAIPo), 103.6 ng/mL (67.1–378.7 ng/mL), and in the children in the study group after 4 weeks of treatment with a milk-free diet (MPIAP1) 62.9 ng/mL (13.3–143.3 ng/mL) (p < 0.0001). By this time, intestinal complaints and skin lesions had resolved in the children. On a milk-free diet, the FZRP concentrations decreased significantly in each infant (Figure 2). The FZRP concentrations differed significantly between the children in the MPIAP1 and MPIAP0 groups (p < 0.0001) and were correlated positively (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001).
In all the study groups, the FZRP concentrations did not depend on gender, type of feeding (breast, modified milk), or family history of allergic diseases.
In the control group, the FZRP concentrations were correlated positively with the FC concentrations (r = 0.07, p = 0.0026). This relationship was not observed in the study groups (MPIAP0, MPIAP1).
In the search for the FZRP concentration that best differentiated healthy children from the control group with children diagnosed with MPIAP, a ROC curve analysis was used. It was found that an FZRP concentration ≥66.28 ng/mL for the MPIAP0 group (with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83%) differentiated it from the control group the best (FZRP < 66.28 ng/mL). Values lower than 66.28 ng/mL were found in 83.3% of the children in the control group and values equal or higher in 100.0% of the children in the MPIAP0 group and 45.6%of the children in the MPIAP1 group (Table 3).
Zonulin was not produced by 16 children (20.6%), all of whom were in the MPIAP group (18.6%).

4. Discussion

FC and FZRP are useful for monitoring the resolution of colitis in infants with MPIAP treated with a dairy-free diet. A decrease in FC and FZRP was observed in each infant over a 4-week diet period. During this time, clinical symptoms (intestinal, atopic dermatitis) resolved in all the infants. However, the values obtained were still higher than in the control children, indicating a slower resolution of intestinal allergic inflammation than of allergy symptoms from a few days to 43 weeks. A slightly faster normalisation of the concentration was observed for FZRP; after a month on a milk-free diet, it already affected half of the infants, while calprotectin normalised in only 40% of the subjects.
This is the first publication describing FZRP concentrations in young infants with MPIAP. FZRP is considered to be the best marker of the increased permeability of the small intestine [30]. The higher concentrations of FZRP in children with MPIAP, in which the lesions are primarily in the colon, indicates that there is also increased small bowel permeability in this disease. On a milk-free diet, allergic inflammation in the colon subsides (stools with blood strands retreat), and the increased permeability of the small intestine decreases.
Sheen et al. found that serum ZRP levels were higher in children with atopic dermatitis than in healthy children [31]. In the study group of children with MPIAP, one-quarter had also atopic dermatitis.
In a group of healthy infants (control group) aged 1–3 months, the median FZRP concentration was 54.1 ng/mL (36.6–101.9 ng/mL). Other values were obtained by Łoniewska et al. when studying 73 infants at 1 month of age 139.61 ng/mL (29.38–712.03 ng/mL). Their study showed that high concentrations of FZRP at 1 month of life will remain at 24 months and, similarly, low concentrations will continue to be low [32].
Niewiem and Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk studied serum levels of ZRP in 49 children aged 7–60 months with IgE-dependent CMPA and 25 with non-IgE-dependent CMPA. They found that the FZRP concentrations were higher in children with non-IgE-CMPA [33].
The dysregulation of the zonulin pathway and subsequent “gut leakiness” is caused by increased intestinal permeability and has been associated with the pathogenesis of both intestinal and extraintestinal autoimmune, inflammatory, and neoplastic disorders [30]. High FZRP activity was found in coeliac disease, non-coeliac gluten sensitivity, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn disease, CD and ulcerative colitis, CU), type 1 and 2 diabetes, obesity, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. FZRP may serve as another biomarker of intestinal damage in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), next to FC [38,39,40,41].
FZPR secretion was shown to be regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-6 [24,43]. FZPRs are elevated in cigarette smokers [40]. There is no knowledge as to whether passive smoking has an effect on the level of FZPR in infants—especially very young ones.
The ratio of lactulose to mannitol in urine after oral administration is a recognised test to assess intestinal permeability. It does not correlate with the amount of FZRP in healthy adults, but it does correlate with it in overweight and obese individuals [36].
In our examination, in the control group, the FZRP concentrations were correlated positively with the FC concentrations (r = 0.07, p = 0.0026). This relationship was not observed in the study groups (CMPAo, CMPA1). FZRP was also strongly correlated with FC in CD and CU [38,41].
Calprotectin was the first description, in 1980, by Fagerhol [44]. Its earlier descriptions were calgranulin and “L1 protein”, “MRP-8/14” [45]. Its concentration is stable at room temperature for 4–7 days. It is resistant to enzymatic degradation and stable after freezing, which underlies its clinical utility [46]. Calprotectin is a group of cytosolic proteins that includes calcium- and zinc-binding proteins. It has numerous biological functions, plays a regulatory role in the inflammatory response, and has antibacterial (bacteriostatic) and antifungal effects [47].
Calprotectin is localised in the cytoplasm of neutrophils, monocytes, and epithelial cells to protect against invading pathogens (bacterial, fungal, and viral). When it is released into the extracellular environment, it can attract receptors that recognise pathogens, activating innate immune and pro-inflammatory mechanisms. In the inflamed epithelium, calprotectin is released from degranulated neutrophils, forming insoluble antimicrobial barriers known as neutrophil extracellular traps [20,48].
FC is used as a marker of intestinal inflammation, primarily so-called neutrophilic inflammation, in which neutrophils aggregate. The activation and death of these cells release large amounts of calprotectin into the intestinal lumen, which is then excreted in the faeces. FC concentrations in stools rise with increased inflammatory activity in the gut and the number of incoming neutrophils that degranulate [20]. Depending on the site of neutrophil degranulation, large amounts of FC increase in body fluids (serum, urine, saline, synovial fluid, and cerebrospinal fluid) or faeces [20,47,48].
High FC levels are described in Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, cystic fibrosis, bacterial infections, cardiovascular and neurological diseases, autism, gastric cancer, and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) [20]. In clinical practice, FC is recognised as a validated and recommended biomarker of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and it is used especially to control the course of the disease, both in children and adults [20,49,50]. Its usefulness in the diagnosis of microscopic colitis, colagenous colitis, and infectious colitis has not been sufficiently studied [51]. It is also used in the differentiation of functional bowel disorders in patients with the diarrhoeal form of IBD [20].
The concentration of FC is higher in children than in adults. In children, FC decreases with age, especially up to the age of 4 years [20]. After this period, in healthy individuals, it does not exceed 50 ug/g, although healthy children can have FC levels of up to 100 ug/g or even higher, probably because of the increased permeability of the intestinal mucosa and differences in intestinal flora [52]. A very high inter-individual variability in FC concentration is observed in infants up to 12 months of age, making it very difficult to use it to assess conditions occurring at this age [53,54]. In Table 4, we have included studies showing FC concentrations in infants up to 12 months of age [32,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. The median FC concentration in the 30 children in our control group was lower than in the studies presented here, at 113.25 mg/L (13.9–219.9 mg/L). Similar values were obtained by Łoniewska et al., who also studied a population from the same region [32,61], and by Orivuori (Pasture study), who studied 758 healthy 2-month-old infants living in Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Switzerland. The FC range was higher in the children living in rural areas than in those in urban areas 76.86 mg/L vs. 308.0 mg/L [65]. The same FC concentrations were also obtained by Finnish researchers in 237 infants aged 3 months: 127 mg/L–212 mg/L [66].
Many researchers have found higher FC concentrations in breastfed infants [67,68,69]. The physiological significance of this phenomenon requires further study [70]. In our study, we did not observe this relationship, probably due to the high proportion of breastfed children (90%). The type of delivery has also been shown to influence FC levels in young infants, but research is inconclusive [59,71].
Young infants with symptoms of stools with blood strands (probably FPIAP) were studied by Baldassarre and Altaee. Baldassarre et al. found that FC concentrations were significantly higher in these infants than in healthy infants (325.89 ± 152.31 mg/L vs. 131.97 ± 37.98 mg/L) and decreased by 50% after 4 weeks of a milk-free diet, although the values were still higher than those in healthy infants [72]. These results are similar to ours. In the group with a diagnosis of MPIAP (MPIAP0), the FC concentrations were 382.9 mg/L (103.5–822.8 mg/L). After 4 weeks on a milk-free diet, the FC concentrations significantly decreased, by 45%, to 208.4 mg/L (67.9–484.4 mg/L). Similar results were obtained by other researchers [73,74].
Many researchers have confirmed a decrease in FC levels in CMPA infants treated with a milk-free diet [63,64,73,75,76,77]. Xiong et al. published a review of 13 studies involving 1238 infants and older children [78]. They found that infants with CMPA, especially those with non-IgE CMPA, have elevated FC concentrations, which decrease on a milk-free diet. At the same time, the changes in FC concentration before and after provocation are not statistically significant. The FC concentration is potentially a good biomarker for the diagnosis, monitoring, and prediction of CMPA in children. However, due to the influence of numerous factors, primarily age, feeding method, and the occurrence of different forms of CMPA, this requires further research.
Galip et al. ruled out the usefulness of FC determinations in the diagnosis and monitoring of allergic proctocolitis [79].
The diagnosis of MPIAP on the basis of FC concentrations is subject to considerable error, due to the high individual variability of this indicator. FZRP is a better parameter, but this needs further research, as these are the first determinations in infants with MPIAP. An important limitation is the phenomenon of FZRP not being produced in all the individuals, affecting one in five infants. Individuals bearing the heterozygous Hb2-1 or homozygous Hb2-2 polymorphism are zonulin producers. These individuals, with the homozygous Hp1-1 polymorphism, are unable to produce zonulin. Zonulin is also present in human sera and stool [21]. In our study group of children, zonulin was not produced by 16 children (20.6%), who all belonged to the CMPA group (18.6%). This limits the usefulness of this marker in diagnosis.
It is necessary to test other faecal markers of intestinal inflammation, such as eosinophil cationic protein, beta defensin, or others.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we investigated two biomarkers found in the stool, FC and FZRP. FC is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation. FZRP is a new marker of increased intestinal permeability. They have the advantage of being non-invasive, highly sensitive, simple to perform, accessible, and easy to use in infants and children. We found that FC and FZRP concentrations increase in young infants with MPIAP and significantly decrease after 4 weeks of a milk-free diet. These biomarkers are therefore useful to assess the decrease in allergic inflammation activity during dietary treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, G.C.-B., K.B. and M.Ł.; Methodology, G.C.-B. and A.D.; Formal analysis, G.C.-B., K.B., M.Ł. and A.D.; Data curation, G.C-B., K.B., M.Ł. and A.D.; Writing—original draft preparation, G.C.-B., K.B. and M.Ł.; Writing—review and editing, G.C.-B.; Project administration, G.C.-B.; Funding acquisition, G.C.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the by statutory activities (WNoZ-319-01/s/12/2020–2022, 27 January 2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Pomeranian Medical University Bioethics Committee No. KB- KB-0012/5/20 (27 January 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Written consent was obtained from the parents/legal guardians for the children to participate in the controlled study. Consent also included permission to store and publish the collected data.

Data Availability Statement

The results of the tests are included in the records of the outpatient clinics where the children were treated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sicherer, S.H. Epidemiology of food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nwaru, B.I.; Hickstein, L.; Panesar, S.S.; Muraro, A.; Werfel, T.; Cardona, V.; Dubois, A.E.J.; Halken, S.; Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K.; Poulsen, L.K.; et al. EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group. The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2014, 69, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Flom, J.D.; Sicherer, S.H. Epidemiology of Cow’s Milk Allergy. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Savage, J.; Johns, C.B. Food allergy: Epidemiology and natural history. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 2015, 35, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. D’Auria, E.; Salvatore, S.; Pozzi, E.; Mantegazza, C.; Sartorio, M.U.A.; Pensabene, L.; Baldassarre, M.E.; Agosti, M.; Vandenplas, Y.; Zuccotti, G.V. Cow’s Milk Allergy: Immunomodulation by Dietary Intervention. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vandenplas, Y.; Meyer, R.; Nowak-Węgrzyn, A.; Salvatore, S.; Venter, C.; Vieira, M.C. The Remaining Challenge to Diagnose and Manage Cow’s Milk Allergy: An Opinion Paper to Daily Clinical Practice. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liacouras, C.A. Food-Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis of Infancy-UPToDate. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/food-protein-induced-allergic-proctocolitis-of-infancy (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  8. Sopo, M.S.; Monaco, S.; Bersani, G.; Romano, A.; Fantacci, C. Proposal for management of the infant with suspected food protein-induced proctocolitis. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mennini, A.; Fiocchi, A.G.; Cafarotti, A.; Montesano, M.; Mauro, A.; Villa, M.P.; Di Nardo, G. Food protein- induced allergic proctocolitis in infants. Literature review and proposal of a management protocol. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100471. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nowak-Węgrzyn, A. Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome and allergic proctocolitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015, 36, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buyuktiryaki, B.; KulhasCelik, I.; Erdem, S.B.; Capanoglu, M.; Civelek, E.; Guc, B.U.; Guvenir, H.; Cakir, M.; Misirlioglu, E.; Akcal, O.; et al. Risk Factors Influencing Toleranceand Clinical Features of Food Protein-induced Allergic Proctocolitis. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2020, 70, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaya, A.; Toyran, M.; Civelek, E.; Misirlioglu, C.; Kirsaclioglu, C.; Kocabas, C. Characteristics and prognosis of allergic proctocolitis in infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015, 61, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nowak-Węgrzyn, A.; Katz, Y.; Mehr, S.S.; Koletzko, S. Non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lozinsky, A.C.; Morais, M. Eosinophyllic colitis in infants. J. Pediatr. 2014, 90, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cianferoni, A. Non-IgE Mediated Food allergy. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2020, 16, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Calvani, M.; Anania, C.; Cuomo, B.; D’Auria, E.; Decimo, F.; Indirli, G.C.; Marseglia, G.; Mastrorilli, V.; Santorio, M.U.A.; Santoro, A.; et al. Non-IgE- or Mixed IgE/Non-IgE-Mediated Gastrointestinal Food Allergies in the First Years of Life: Old and New Tools for Diagnosis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Del Arco, D.; Taxonera, C.; Olivares, D.; Acenero, F. Eosinophyllic colitis. Case series and literaturę review. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2018, 214, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koletzko, S.; Niggemann, B.; Aratό, A.; Dias, J.A.; Heuschkel, R.; Husby, S.; Mearin, M.L.; Papadopoulou, A.; Ruemmele, F.M.; Staiano, A.; et al. Diagnostic approach and management of cow’s-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012, 55, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waligora-Dupriet, A.J.; Campeotto, F.; Romero, K.; Mangin, I.; Rouzaud, G.; Ménard, O.; Suau, A.; Soulaines, P.; Nicolis, I.; Kapel, N.; et al. Diversity of gut Bifidobacterium 3905name proteins: Is calpoprotein a properspecies is not altered between allergic and non-allergic French infants. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koninckx, C.R.; Donat, E.; Benninga, M.A.; Broekaert, I.J.; Gottrand, F.; Kolho, K.-L.; Lionetti, P.; Miele, E.; Orel, R.; Papadopoulou, A.; et al. The Use of Fecal Calpoprotectin Testing in Paediatric Disorders: A Position Paper of the European Society for Gastroenterology and Nutrition Gastroenterology Committee. J. Ped. Gastroenterol. Nutrition 2021, 4, 617–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ajamian, M.; Steer, D.; Rosella, G.; Gibson, P.R. Serum zonulin as a marker of intestinal mucosal barier function: May not be what it seems. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fasano, A. Zonulin and its regulation of intestinal barier function: The biological door to inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 151–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fasano, A. Intestinal permeability and its regulation by zonulin: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 10, 1096–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Drago, S.; Asmar, R.E.; Di Pierro, M.; Clemente, M.G.; Tripathi, A.; Sapone, A.; Thakar, M.; Iacono, G.; Carroccio, A.; D’Agate, C.; et al. Gliadin, zonulin and gut permeability: Effects on celiac and non-celiac intestine mucosa and intestinal cell lines. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 4, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fiocchi, A.; Brozek, J.; Schunemann, H.; Bahna, S.; von Berg, A.; Beyer, K.; Bozzola, M.; Bradsher, J.; Compalati, E.; Ebisawa, M.; et al. World Allergy Organization (WAO) diagnosis and rationale for action against cow’s milk allergy (DRACMA) guidelines. World Allergy Organ. J. 2010, 3, 57–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muraro, A.; Werfel, T.; Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K.; Roberts, G.; Beyer, K.; Bindslev-Jensen, C.; Cardona, V.; Dubois, A.; du Toit, G.; Eigenmann, P.; et al. EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines: Diagnosis and management of food allergy. Allergy 2014, 69, 1008–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sampson, H.A.; Gerthvan, W.R.; Bindslev-Jensen, C.; Sicherer, S.; Teuber, S.S.; Burks, A.W. Standardizing double-blind, placebocontrolled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 130, 1260–1274. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nowak-Wegrzyn, A.; Assa’ad, A.H.; Bahna, S.L.; Bock, S.A.; Sicherer, S.H.; Teuber, S.S. Work group report: Oral food challengetesting. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, S365–S383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sampson, H.A.; Aceves, S.; Bock, S.A.; James, J.; Jones, S.; Lang, D. Food allergy: A practice parameter update—2014. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sturgeon, C.; Fasano, A. Zonulin, a regulator of epithelial and endothelial barrier functions, and its involvement in chronic inflammatory diseases. Tissue Barriers 2016, 4, e1251384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheen, Y.H.; Jee, H.M.; Kim, D.H.; Ha, E.K.; Jeong, I.J.; Lee, S.J.; Baek, H.S.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, K.-J.; Lee, K.S.; et al. Serum is associated with presence and severity of atopic dermatitis in children, independent of total IgE and eosinophil. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Łoniewska, B.; Adamek, K.; Węgrzyn, D.; Kaczmarczyk, M.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Clark, J.; Adler, G.; Tousty, J.; Uzar, I.; Tousty, P.; et al. Analysis of Fecal Zonulin and Calpoprotectin Concentrations in Healthy Children during the First Two Years of Life. An Observational Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Niewiem, M.; Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk, U. Assessment of Selected Intestinal Permeability Markers in Children with Food Allergy Depending on the Type and Severity of Clinical Symptoms. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fasano, A. All disease begins in the (leaky) gut: Role of zonulin-mediated gut permeability in the pathogenesis of some chronić inflammatory diseases. F1000 Res. 2020, 9, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kort, S.; Keszthelyi, D.; Masclee, A.A. Leaky gut and diabetes mellitus. What is the link? Obes. Rev. 2011, 12, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Küme, T.; Acar, S.; Tuhan, H.A. The relationship between serum zonulin level and clinical and laboratory parameters of childhood obesity. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2017, 9, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fasano, A.; Not, T.; Wang, W. Zonulin, a newly discovered modulator of intestinal permeability, and its expression in coeliac disease. Lancet 2000, 29, 1518–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Szymańska, E.; Wierzbicka, A.; Dadalski, M.; Kierkuś, J. Fecal Zonulin as a Noninvasive Biomarker of Intestinal Permeability in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases—Correlation with Disease Activity and Fecal Calpoprotein. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Caviglia, G.P.; Dughera, F.; Ribaldone, D.G.; Rosso, C.; Abate, M.L.; Pellicano, R.; Bresso, F.; Smedile, A.; Sarracco, G.M.; Astegiana, M. Serum zonulin in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A pilot study. Minerva Med. 2019, 110, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Malíčková, K.; Francová, I.; Lukáš, M.; Kolář, M.; Králíková, E.; Bortlík, M.; Ďuricová, D.; Štěpánková, L.; Zvolská, K.; Pánková, A.; et al. Fecal zonulin is elevated in Crohn’s disease and in cigarette smokers. Pract. Lab. Med. 2017, 9, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Szymanska, E.; Bierla, J.; Dadalski, M.; Wierzbicka, A.; Konopka, E.; Cukrowska, B.; Kierkus, J. New non-invasive biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and increased intestinal permeability in pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases and their correlation with fecal calprotectin: A pilot study. Minerva Gastroenterol. (Torino) 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Esnafoglu, E.; Cırrık, S.; Ayyıldız, S.N.; Erdil, A.; Ertürk, E.Y.; Daglı, A.; Noyan, T. Increased Serum Zonulin Levels as an Intestinal Permeability Marker in Autistic Subjects. J. Pediatr. 2017, 188, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Seethaler, B.; Basrai, M.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Nazare, J.-A.; Walter, J.; Delzenne, N.M.; Bischoff, S.C. Biomarkers for assessment of intestinal permeability in clinical practice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 1, G11–G17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fagerhol, M.K.; Dale, I.; Anderson, T. Releae and quantition of a leucocyte derived protein (L1). Scand. J. Hematol. 1980, 24, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fagerhol, M.K. Nomenclature for proteins: Is calpoprotein a proper name for the elusive myelomonocytic protein? Clin. Mol. Pathol. 1996, 49, M74–M79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Naess-Andresen, C.F.; Egelandsdal, B.; Fagerhol, M.K. Calcium binding and concomitant changes in the structureand heat stability of cal-protectin (L1 protectin). Clin. Mol. Pathol. 1995, 48, M278–M284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Montalto, M.; Gallo, A.; Santoro, L.; Landolfi, R.; Gasbarrini, A. Role of fecal calpoprotectin in gastrointestinal disorders. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 1569–1582. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Johne, B.; Fagerhol, M.K.; Lyberg, T.; Prydz, H.; Brandtzaeg, P.; Naess-Andresen, C.F.; Dale, I. Functonal and clinical aspects of the myelomonocyte protein calpoprotectin. Mol. Pathol. 1997, 50, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Turner, D.; Ruemmele, F.M.; Orlanski-Meyer, E.; Griffiths, A.M.; de Carpi, J.M.; Bronsky, J.; Veres, G.; Aloi, M.; Strisciuglio, C.; Braegger, C.; et al. Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care—An Evidence-based GuidelineFrom European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2018, 2, 257–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Torres, J.; Bonovas, S.; Doherty, G.; Kucharzik, T.; Gisbert, J.P.; Raine, T.; Adamina, M.; Armuzzi, A.; Bachmann, O.; Bager, P.; et al. ECCO Working Group. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutic in Crohn’s Disease: Medical Treatment. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2020, 14, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. D’Angelo, F.; Felley, C.; Frossard, J.L. Calpoprotectin in Daily Practice: Where Do We Stand in 2017? Digestion 2017, 95, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roca, M.; Rodriguez, V.A.; Donat, E.; Cano, F.; Hervas, D.; Armisen, A.; Vaya, M.J.; Sjölander, A.; Ribes-Koninckx, C. Fecal Calprotectin and Eosinophil-derived Neurotoxin in Healthy Children between 0 and 12 Years. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 65, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Oord, T.; Hornung, N. Fecal calpoprotectin in healthy children. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2014, 74, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ezri, J.; Nydegger, A. Pediatrics. Fecal calpoprotectinin children. Use an interpretation. Rev. Med. Suisse 2011, 7, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Olafsdottir, E.; Aksnes, E.; Fluge, G.; Berstad, A. Fecal calpoprotectin levels in infants with infantile colic, healthy infans, childrem with inflammatory bowel disease, children recurrent abdominal pain and healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 2002, 91, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hestvik, E.; Tumwine, J.K.; Tylleskar, T.; Granhquist, L.; Ndezzi, G.; Kaddu- Mulindwa, D.H.; Aksnes, L.; Olafsdottir, E. Faecal calprotectin concentrations in apparently healthy children aged 0–12 years in urban Kampala, Uganda: A community-based survey. BMC Pediatr. 2011, 7, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, F.; Ma, J.; Geng, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Sheng, X. Fecal calpoprotectin concentrations in healthy children aged 1–18 months. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, J.Y.; Lee, Y.M.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeong, S.J. Fecal calprotectin level in healthy children aged less than 4 years in South Korea. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2017, 31, e22113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lee, Y.M.; Min, C.Y.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeong, S.J. Delivery and feeding mode affects fecal calprotectin levels in infants <7 months old. Early Hum. Dev. 2017, 108, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  60. Peura, S.; Fall, T.; Almqvist, C.; Andolf, E.; Hedman, A.; Pershagen, G.; Helmersson-Karlqvist, J.; Larsson, A. Normal values for calpoprotectin in stool samples of infants from the population –based longitudinal born into life study. Scand. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 78, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Łoniewska, B.; Węgrzyn, D.; Adamek, K.; Kaczmarczyk, M.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Adler, G.; Jankowska, A.; Uzar, I.; Kordek, A.; Celewicz, M.; et al. The influence of Maternal-Foetal Parameters on Concentrations of Zonulin and Calpoprotectin in the Blood and Stool of Healthy Newborns during the First Seven Days of Life. An Observational Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Park, J.S.; Cho, J.Y.; Chung, C.; Oh, S.H.; Do, H.-j.; Seo, J.-H.; Lim, J.Y.; Park, C.-H.; Woo, H.-O.; Youn, H.-S. Dynamic Changes of Fecal Calpoprotectin and Related Clinical Factors in Neonates. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rycyk, A.; Cudowska, B.; Lebensztejn, D.M. Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alfa, and Calpoprotectin as Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Food Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis in Infants. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Qiu, L.; Wang, J.; Ren, F.; Shen, L.; Li, F. Can fecal calpoprotectin levels be used to monitor infant milk protein allergies? Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2021, 17, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Orivuori, L.; Mustonen, K.; de Goffau, M.; Hakala, S.; Paasela, M.; Roduit, C.; Dalphin, J.-C.; Genuneit, J.; Lauener, R.; Riedler, J.; et al. PASTURE Study Group. High level of fecal calpoprotectin at age 2 months as a marker of intestinal inflammation predicts atopic dermatitis and asthma by age 6. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Merras-Salmio, L.; Kolho, K.; Pelkonen, A.S.; Kuitunen, M.; Mäkelä, M.J.; Savilahti, E. Markers of gut mucosal inflammation and cow’s milk specific immunoglobulins in non-IgE cow’s milk allergy. Clin. Trans. Allergy 2014, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fagerberg, U.L.; Lööf, L.; Merzoug, R.D.; Hansson, L.-O.; Finkel, Y. Fecal calpoprotectin levels in healthy children studied with an improved assay. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2003, 37, 468–472. [Google Scholar]
  68. Savino, F.; Castagno, E.; Calabrese, R.; Viola, S.; Oggero, R.; Miniero, R. High fecal calpoprotectin levels in healthy, exclusively breast-fed infants. Neonatology 2010, 97, 29–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Li, F.; Ma, J.; Geng, S.; Wang, J.; Fang Ren, F.; Sheng, X. Comparison of the different kinds of feeding on the level of fecal calpoprotectin. Early. Hum. Dev. 2014, 90, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Castanet, M.; Costalos, C.; Hajden, N.; Hascoet, J.-M.; Berger, B.; Sprenger, N.; Grathwolh, D.; Brüssow, H.; De Groot, N.; Steenhout, P.; et al. Early Effect of Supplemented Infant Formulae on Intestinal Biomarkers and microbiota: ARandomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vidova, V.; Benesova, E.; Klanova, J.; Thon, V.; Spacil, Z. Simultaneous Quantitative profiling of clinically relevant immune markers in neonatal stool swabs to reveal inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baldassarre, M.E.; Laforgia, N.; Fanelli, M.; Laneve, A.; Grosso, R.; Lifschitz, C. Lactobacillus GG improves recovery in infants with blood in the stools and presumptive allergic colitis compared with extensively hydrolyzed formula alone. J. Pediatr. 2010, 156, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lendvai-Emmert, D.; Emmert, V.; Makai, A.; Fusz, K.; Prémusz, V.; Eklics, K.; Sarlós, P.; Tóth, P.; Amrein, K.; Tóth, G. Fecal calprotectin levels in pediatric cow’s milk protein allergy. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 945212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, Z.-H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.-H.; Pan, J.; Chen, X. Fecal Calprotectin in Children with Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2022, 183, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Beşer, Ö.F.; Sancak, S.; Erkan, T.; Kutlu, T.; Cokuğraş, H.; Cokuğraş, F.C. Can fecal calpoprotectin level be used as a markers of inflammation in the diagnosis and follow-up of cow’s milk protein allergy? Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2014, 6, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Belizón, T.C.; Paez, O.E.; Claros, A.F.M.; Sanchez, I.R.; Gonzales, A.R.; Medialdea, R.V.; Salguero, J.M.R. Fecal calpoprotectin as an aid to the diagnosis of non-IgE mediated cow’s milk protein Allergy. Ann. Pediatr. 2016, 84, 318–323. [Google Scholar]
  77. Roca, M.; Donat, E.; Varela, A.R.; Carjaval, E.; Cano, F.; Armisen, A.; Ekoff, H.; Canada-Martinez, A.J.; Rydell, N.; Ribes-Koninckx, C. Fecal Calpoprotectin and Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin in Children with Non-IgE-Mediated Cow’s Milk Protein. Allergy J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xiong, L.-J.; Xie, X.-L.; Deng, X.-Z. Current status of fecal calpoprotectin as a diagnostic or monitoring biomarker for cow’s milk protein allergy in children: A scoping review. World J. Pediatr. 2021, 17, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galip, N.; Yuruker, O.; Babayigit, A. Characteristics of allergic proctocolitis in early infancy; accuracy of diagnostic tools and factors related to tolerance development. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 16 02949 sch001
Scheme 1. The diagnostic scheme for the examination of infants with diarrhoea with blood or blood strands and sometimes atopic dermatitis. * FPIAP—food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis = MPIAP—milk-protein-Induced allergic proctocolitis; ** until symptoms resolved or decreased significantly; *** scintigraphy for Meckel’s diverticulum, gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy (eosinophyllic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), colon polyps, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)), and tests for Hirschprung’s disease; **** improvement in: total (n = 95), significant (n = 3); **** OFC—oral food challenge; ***** FC—faecal calprotectin, FZRP—faecal-zonulin-related proteins: 0—before introduction of milk-free diet, 1—after one month of milk-free diet.
Scheme 1. The diagnostic scheme for the examination of infants with diarrhoea with blood or blood strands and sometimes atopic dermatitis. * FPIAP—food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis = MPIAP—milk-protein-Induced allergic proctocolitis; ** until symptoms resolved or decreased significantly; *** scintigraphy for Meckel’s diverticulum, gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy (eosinophyllic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), colon polyps, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)), and tests for Hirschprung’s disease; **** improvement in: total (n = 95), significant (n = 3); **** OFC—oral food challenge; ***** FC—faecal calprotectin, FZRP—faecal-zonulin-related proteins: 0—before introduction of milk-free diet, 1—after one month of milk-free diet.
Nutrients 16 02949 sch001
Nutrients 16 02949 g001
Figure 1. Values of stool calprotectin (FC) concentrations in the study groups: at diagnosis and after 1 month of treatment with a milk-free diet. The graph shows the differences in the levels of calprotectin between the study group at the time of diagnos and the control group.
Figure 1. Values of stool calprotectin (FC) concentrations in the study groups: at diagnosis and after 1 month of treatment with a milk-free diet. The graph shows the differences in the levels of calprotectin between the study group at the time of diagnos and the control group.
Nutrients 16 02949 g001
Nutrients 16 02949 g002
Figure 2. Values of stool zonulin (faecal zonulin-related protein, FZRP) concentrations in the study groups: at diagnosis and after 1 month of treatment with a milk-free diet. The graph shows the differential level of FZRP values between the study group at the time of diagnosis and the control group.
Figure 2. Values of stool zonulin (faecal zonulin-related protein, FZRP) concentrations in the study groups: at diagnosis and after 1 month of treatment with a milk-free diet. The graph shows the differential level of FZRP values between the study group at the time of diagnosis and the control group.
Nutrients 16 02949 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of the study group—milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (MPIAP0) and control group.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study group—milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (MPIAP0) and control group.
ParameterStudy Group
MPIAP0
n = 86		Control Group *
n = 30		p
Age median (mo)2 (1–3)2 (1–3)ns **
Males (n, %) 62 (72.1%)24 (80%)ns ***
Body mass median (centiles)25 (10–97)50 (10–97)ns **
Height median (centiles)50 (10–97)50 (10–97)ns **
Feeding at the time of diagnosis (n/%)
breast79 (91.9%)27 (90.0%)
breast + infants’ milk5 (5.8%)2 (6.7%)ns ***
only infants’ milk2 (2.3%)1 (3.3%)
Allergies in family (n/%)47 (54.6%) 13 (43.3%)
father34 (39.5%)9 (30.0%)
mother 30 (34.9%)7 (23.3%)ns ***
siblings61 (71.7%)14 (46.7%)
Symptoms (n/%)
MPIAP ****64 (74.4%)-
MPIAP + atopic dermatitis22 (25.6%)-
General symptoms (n/%)
anxiety 30 (34.9%)5 (17.0%)
anemia8 (9.3%) 6 (20.0%)<0.05 ***
eosinophilia18 (60.0%)0 (0.0%)
Milk-free diet during treatment (n/%)
breast 78 (90.8%)
breast + eHf *****6 (6.9%)
only eHf *****2 (2.3%)
* children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, in whom a relation of symptoms to milk allergy was excluded; ** Mann–Whitney U-test; *** Spearman’s rank correlation test; **** MPIAP—milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis; ***** eHf—extensively hydrolysed infant formulae.
Table 2. Concentration levels of faecal calprotectin and faecal-zonulin-related proteins in the control group and in children with milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis in the period of diagnosis (MPIAP0) and over 1 month of milk-free diet (MPIAP1).
Table 2. Concentration levels of faecal calprotectin and faecal-zonulin-related proteins in the control group and in children with milk-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis in the period of diagnosis (MPIAP0) and over 1 month of milk-free diet (MPIAP1).
ParameterControl Group
n = 30		Study Group
MPIAP0
n = 86		Study Group
MPIAP1
n = 86		p ***
Calprotectin * (mg/L)
median 113.2382.9208.40.0000 ****
range13.9–219.9103.5–822.867.9–484.4
Zonulin ** (ng/mL)
median54.1103.662.90.0000 ****
range36.6–101.967.1–378.713.3–143.3
* calprotectin—faecal calprotectin; ** zonulin—faecal zonulin-related proteins; *** Mann–Whitney U-test; **** MPIAP0/MPIAP1 and Control/MPIAP0 and Control/MPIAP1.
Table 3. Frequency of the occurrence of differentiating values for the faecal calprotectin and faecal-zonulin-related proteins in the control group and study group in the diagnosis time (MPIAP0) and after one month of milk-free diet (MPIAP1).
Table 3. Frequency of the occurrence of differentiating values for the faecal calprotectin and faecal-zonulin-related proteins in the control group and study group in the diagnosis time (MPIAP0) and after one month of milk-free diet (MPIAP1).
ParameterControl Group
n = 30
n (%)		Study Group Diagnosis
MPIAP0
n (%)		Study Group
After 1 mo of Milk-Free Diet
MPIAP1
n (%)		p ***
Control/MPIAP0
MPIAP0/MPIAP1		p ***
Control/
MPIAP1
Calprotectin * (n) mg/Ln = 30 ****n = 86 ****n = 86 ****0.0000
<193.7529 (96.7%)7 (8.1%)33 (38.4%)
>193.751 (3.3%)79 (91.9%)53 (61.6%) 0.00000.0000
Zonulin ** (n) ng/mLn = 30 ****n = 70 ****n = 70 ****0.0000
<66.2825 (83.3%) 31 (54.4%)
>66.285 (16.75)70 (100%)26 (45.6%)0.00740.0000
* calprotectin—faecal calprotectin; ** zonulin—faecal zonulin-related proteins; *** Spearman’s range correlation test; **** number of determinations—in the study group, 16 infants had zonulin levels of 0.
Table 4. Reference values of faecal calprotectin (FC) in healthy infants (0–12 months of age).
Table 4. Reference values of faecal calprotectin (FC) in healthy infants (0–12 months of age).
ReferenceNo. of SubjectsAgeFC Median/
Average (µg/g)		Range FC (µg/g)
Olafsdottir et al. [55]270–12 mo <350
Ezri and Nydegger [54] 0–12 mo277 ± 109<350
Hestvik et al. [56]540–12 mo249.0
Oord and Hornung [53]751–6 mo538
Lie et al. [57] 1–3 mo375.2
3–6 mo 219.7
6–9 mo123.5
9–12 mo109.5
Song et al. [58] 467–12 mo135.0
Roca et al. [52] 670–12 mo910.3
Lee et al. [59]all 133 0–2 mo322.0
2–4 mo197.0
4–6 mo111.0
Peura et al. [60]720 mo 324.0274–381
636 mo615.0189–1057
6012 mo136.0119–179
Łoniewska et al. [61]727 days139.112–627
Łoniewska et al. [32]741 mo149.3
706 mo109.3
Park et al. [62]1341 week418.1 ± 864.9
672 week 243.1 ± 328.8
413–4 weeks259.6 ± 368.2
Rycyk et al. [63]251–12 mo332.074–759
Qiu et al. [64]900–9 mo410.0168–1739
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czaja-Bulsa, G.; Bulsa, K.; Łokieć, M.; Drozd, A. Can Faecal Zonulin and Calprotectin Levels Be Used in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up in Infants with Milk Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis? Nutrients 2024, 16, 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172949

AMA Style

Czaja-Bulsa G, Bulsa K, Łokieć M, Drozd A. Can Faecal Zonulin and Calprotectin Levels Be Used in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up in Infants with Milk Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis? Nutrients. 2024; 16(17):2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czaja-Bulsa, Grażyna, Karolina Bulsa, Monika Łokieć, and Arleta Drozd. 2024. "Can Faecal Zonulin and Calprotectin Levels Be Used in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up in Infants with Milk Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis?" Nutrients 16, no. 17: 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172949

APA Style

Czaja-Bulsa, G., Bulsa, K., Łokieć, M., & Drozd, A. (2024). Can Faecal Zonulin and Calprotectin Levels Be Used in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up in Infants with Milk Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis? Nutrients, 16(17), 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop