Next Article in Journal
The Interplay between Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and the Epigenome towards Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Completely Plant-Based Diets That Meet Energy Requirements for Resistance Training Can Supply Enough Protein and Leucine to Maximize Hypertrophy and Strength in Male Bodybuilders: A Modeling Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Seaweed Proteins: A Step towards Sustainability?

1
Marine Resources, Conservation and Technology, Marine Algae Laboratory, Centre for Functional Ecology—Science for People & the Planet (CFE), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Department of Biology and CESAM—Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(8), 1123; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081123
Submission received: 14 March 2024 / Revised: 6 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 April 2024 / Published: 10 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Uncommon Alternative Sources of Protein)

Abstract

:
This review delves into the burgeoning field of seaweed proteins as promising alternative sources of protein. With global demand escalating and concerns over traditional protein sources’ sustainability and ethics, seaweed emerges as a viable solution, offering a high protein content and minimal environmental impacts. Exploring the nutritional composition, extraction methods, functional properties, and potential health benefits of seaweed proteins, this review provides a comprehensive understanding. Seaweed contains essential amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. Its protein content ranges from 11% to 32% of dry weight, making it valuable for diverse dietary preferences, including vegetarian and vegan diets. Furthermore, this review underscores the sustainability and environmental advantages of seaweed protein production compared to traditional sources. Seaweed cultivation requires minimal resources, mitigating environmental issues like ocean acidification. As the review delves into specific seaweed types, extraction methodologies, and functional properties, it highlights the versatility of seaweed proteins in various food products, including plant-based meats, dairy alternatives, and nutritional supplements. Additionally, it discusses the potential health benefits associated with seaweed proteins, such as their unique amino acid profile and bioactive compounds. Overall, this review aims to provide insights into seaweed proteins’ potential applications and their role in addressing global protein needs sustainably.

1. Introduction

The global demand for protein continues to rise with increasing populations and changing dietary preferences. Traditional sources of protein, such as meat, poultry, and dairy, face challenges related to environmental sustainability, resource depletion, and ethical concerns [1]. As a result, there is growing interest in exploring alternative sources of protein that are both nutritious and sustainable. Seaweed, a diverse group of marine algae, presents a promising solution due to its high protein content and minimal environmental impact [2].
Seaweed as a high-protein food refers to various marine algae that contain a significant amount of protein relative to their overall composition. Seaweed is known for its rich nutritional profile, which includes vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other beneficial compounds [3]. While the protein content can vary depending on the type of seaweed, it generally ranges from 10% to 30% of its dry weight. Seaweed is considered a valuable source of plant-based protein, especially for individuals following vegetarian or vegan diets, as it provides essential amino acids necessary for human health. Incorporating seaweed into the diet can contribute to meeting daily protein requirements while also offering other health benefits associated with its nutrient content [4].
With burgeoning populations, environmental concerns, and shifts in dietary preferences, traditional protein sources such as meat and dairy are being scrutinized for their sustainability and ethical implications [3]. In response, researchers and food innovators are exploring diverse avenues to meet protein needs while mitigating the environmental impact of food production. One promising avenue lies in harnessing the potential of seaweed proteins, which offer a sustainable and nutritious alternative to conventional protein sources [4].
Traditionally valued for its culinary uses in various Asian cuisines, seaweed is now garnering attention for its protein content and sustainability credentials [5]. Seaweed cultivation requires minimal freshwater, land, and fertilizers, making it a highly sustainable protein source compared to land-based agriculture [6]. Moreover, seaweed cultivation can sequester carbon dioxide and mitigate ocean acidification, further enhancing its environmental benefits [7].
In recent years, the exploration of seaweed proteins as a viable alternative to animal-derived proteins has gained momentum [8]. Seaweed proteins boast a unique amino acid profile, containing all the essential amino acids necessary for human nutrition [9]. Additionally, seaweed proteins are rich in vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds, offering a holistic nutritional package [10]. With advancements in processing technologies, seaweed proteins can be extracted and incorporated into a variety of food products, including plant-based meats, dairy alternatives, and nutritional supplements. This versatility makes seaweed proteins an attractive option for addressing the protein needs of diverse consumer demographics, including vegetarians, vegans, and individuals seeking sustainable dietary choices [11].
Furthermore, the sustainable cultivation of seaweed holds promise for addressing key challenges in global food security and environmental sustainability. Seaweed cultivation requires no arable land and minimal inputs, making it accessible to coastal communities and land-scarce regions [12]. By leveraging seaweed cultivation as a means of protein production, nations can reduce pressure on terrestrial ecosystems, preserve biodiversity, and promote resilience in the face of climate change. Moreover, the cultivation of seaweed can create employment opportunities and support livelihoods in coastal communities, contributing to economic development and poverty alleviation [13].
The growing demand for alternative protein sources underscores the need for sustainable and innovative solutions to meet the nutritional needs of a burgeoning global population [14]. Seaweed proteins offer a compelling pathway towards achieving this goal, combining nutritional excellence with environmental stewardship [15]. As research and development efforts continue to unlock the full potential of seaweed proteins, they hold the promise of revolutionizing the food industry and fostering a more sustainable and equitable future for generations to come [16,17,18,19].
This review aims to explore the seaweed potential towards a more sustainable human welfare future, reducing the pressure from traditional protein sources, with the possibility of reducing human health problems.

2. Nutritional Composition of Seaweed

The chemical composition of macroalgae presents great variability as it can be influenced by the species, stage of development, geographical location, habitat, season, and nutrient content in the growth medium, among other environmental factors. Additionally, different sampling and drying methodologies can affect the biochemical composition and, consequently, the nutritional value [20]. Algae are a good source of micronutrients such as vitamins (e.g., vitamin A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B12, C, D, E, pantothenic acid, and folic acid), sterols, and minerals (e.g., calcium, magnesium, potassium, iodine, sodium, phosphorus, nickel, chromium, selenium, iron, zinc, manganese, copper, lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic) [21]. Magnesium, nickel, chromium, iron, zinc, manganese, and copper are essential nutrients for various physiological and biochemical functions of the body [22]. However, they should be consumed in adequate quantities, as excessive exposure can cause acute or chronic toxicity [23]. The remaining minerals (lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic) are considered undesirable [24]. This mineral richness is related to the algae’s ability to retain inorganic matter, which represents up to 36% of dry weight in some species [25].
Algae are one of the few non-animal sources of vitamin B12. For example, it is reported that Porphyra spp. (Figure 1) contains 32.26 to 133.8 µg per 100 g of dry weight, which equates to 1.61 µg (64% RDA) to 6.69 µg (268% RDA) in a 5 g portion of Porphyra spp. [25], considering that the recommended daily dose (RDA) of vitamin B12 is 2.5 µg for an adult, according to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. Thus, algae containing vitamin B12 can be useful for individuals following a vegan diet [26].
In addition to micronutrients, seaweed is a source of macronutrients, including proteins and amino acids (essential and non-essential), carbohydrates (mostly fiber), and fat (with special interest in polyunsaturated fatty acids) [16]. Overall, red algae contain high levels of protein, up to 47% (w/w) on a dry weight basis. Green algae contain moderate amounts, ranging from 9 to 26% (w/w) on a dry weight basis, while brown algae contain a much lower protein content, ranging from 3 to 15% (w/w) on a dry weight basis [27]. According to the literature, during the winter and early spring, macroalgae have the highest protein content [28]. Cultivated algae have a higher protein content compared to wild algae because they grow in environments that are often nutrient-limited, while cultivated algae grow in nutrient-rich water from terrestrial systems [29].
It should be noted that the protein content in algae is often estimated using a conversion factor of 6.25 (the Kjeldahl method), based on the assumption that most of the nitrogen found in the sample occurs as protein nitrogen [30]. However, this conversion factor may overestimate the protein content due to the presence of variable amounts of non-protein nitrogen in the sample (e.g., chlorophyll, nucleic acids, free amino acids, and inorganic nitrogen). In more recent studies, other conversion factors have been proposed that vary with species and season [31]. Angell et al. (2016) propose a universal conversion factor of 5 a rounded value of the global average of conversion factors (4.97), based on the ratio of total amino acids to total nitrogen. This study included the analysis of 103 species, covering three taxonomic groups, various geographic regions, and different physiological states [32]. Lourenço et al. [33] calculated the nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor for the three different taxonomic groups in the same way and obtained the following results: 5.13 (green algae), 5.38 (brown algae), and 4.59 (red algae). The values suggest that red algae contain a higher amount of non-protein nitrogen [33]. However, both studies show that the widespread use of the conversion factor 6.25 is inadequate for seaweeds.
Amino acid composition is essential for determining the value of proteins in the human diet, particularly to achieve adequate intake of essential amino acids [34]. Algal proteins contain significant amounts of essential amino acids, representing almost half of the total amino acids [25]. However, tryptophan and lysine are generally limiting amino acids in most algal species [8]. Additionally, cysteine is usually low in many species of seaweed and is generally undetectable [25]. In Ulva rigida (Figure 2), leucine, phenylalanine, and valine are the major essential amino acids, and histidine levels are similar to those found in legumes and eggs [35,36]. There is a notable similarity in the total amino acid composition of the Ulva genus with egg ovalbumin [37]. In most analyses of amino acid composition in seaweed, glutamic acid and aspartic acid are the major amino acids and also contribute to their characteristic “umami” flavor [38,39].
The fat content of macroalgae tends to be low relative to the total dry weight. The percentage of fat content is higher in the winter and lower in the summer, and the fatty acid composition varies with the season [40]. It is noteworthy that Porphyra spp. has the lowest content of saturated fatty acids (17.4% of total fatty acids) [41].
The carbohydrate content tends to be relatively high; however, macroalgae cannot be considered an energy food because the digestibility of these carbohydrates is low. Typical polysaccharides of red algae include floridean starch, cellulose, xylan, mannan, and sulfated galactans (carrageenans and agars) [42]. In the Porphyra genus, porphyran is the predominantly sulfated polysaccharide found. Most of these polysaccharides are not digestible by the human gastrointestinal tract and are therefore considered dietary fiber [43]. In Gracilaria spp. (Figure 3), for instance, the dietary fiber content varies from 23.5% to 64% in dry weight, values that surpass the fiber content in most fruits and vegetables [44]. Given the high variability in chemical composition, Table 1 presents the nutritional composition of selected edible seaweeds.
Seaweed cultivation practices significantly influence its nutritional composition, particularly concerning protein content. Cultivated seaweed tends to exhibit higher protein levels compared to wild algae [6,12]. This disparity arises due to the controlled environments of seaweed farms, where nutrient-rich conditions promote robust growth and protein accumulation. In contrast, wild algae often grow in nutrient-limited marine habitats, resulting in a comparatively lower protein content [6].
Various factors during seaweed cultivation contribute to the observed differences in protein content. For instance, the availability of essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus directly impacts seaweed growth and protein synthesis. Cultivation methods, such as integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), where seaweed is grown alongside other marine organisms like shellfish, can enhance nutrient availability and thus increase protein content [13,29].
Additionally, environmental conditions, including temperature, light intensity, and salinity, play crucial roles in shaping seaweed composition. Optimal conditions promote efficient photosynthesis and metabolic processes, leading to higher protein accumulation. Moreover, the developmental stage of seaweed during cultivation can influence protein content, with certain growth phases favoring protein synthesis [6,12].
Understanding these relationships between cultivation methods and seaweed composition is essential for optimizing protein yield and nutritional quality. By elucidating the impact of cultivation practices on seaweed protein content, this review provides valuable insights into harnessing seaweed as a sustainable and nutritious protein source for various applications [28].

3. Physiological Importance of Amino Acids

Amino acids are defined as organic substances that contain at least one amine group and one carboxylic group. According to their side chains, amino acids have different biochemical properties and functions [69]. Apart from glycine (the simplest amino acid in nature), all amino acids possess at least one asymmetric carbon and exhibit optical activity [70]. Amino acids can be designated as D- or L-depending on the absolute configuration of the substituents around the asymmetric carbon. L-amino acids are the most frequently found physiological isomers in nature. However, D-amino acids also exist in animals, microorganisms, and plants [71].
There are more than 700 amino acids in nature, but only 20 (α-amino acids) are used as building blocks for proteins. Amino acids used as substrates for polypeptide biosynthesis are called proteinogenic amino acids (e.g., methionine and proline), while amino acids that are not protein building blocks are known as non-proteinogenic amino acids (e.g., citrulline, homocysteine, and hydroxyproline) [72]. However, not all amino acids present in polypeptides can be considered proteinogenic amino acids because modifications may occur after translation, leading to the formation of new amino acid residues. An example is hydroxyproline, which is produced from proline by peptidyl proline hydroxylase after protein synthesis. Amino acids can be classified as nutritionally essential (indispensable) or non-essential (dispensable) [73].
Essential amino acids are those that cannot be synthesized by the body or are synthesized in insufficient quantities to meet the needs and, therefore, must be provided by the diet. Among the 20 proteinogenic amino acids, 9 are considered essential: isoleucine, leucine, valine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and histidine [71].
Non-essential amino acids are those that can be synthesized by the body in adequate quantities to meet its needs [74]. Amino acids have various physiological functions, including regulation of food intake, gene expression, protein phosphorylation, and cell-to-cell communication. Additionally, amino acids are essential precursors for the synthesis of hormones and low-molecular-weight nitrogenous substances, each with significant biological importance. Thus, a balance of amino acids in the diet and circulation is necessary for organismal homeostasis [35].

What Are Essential Amino Acids for?

Each of the essential amino acids has specific and vital functions for the proper functioning of the body. They are necessary for tissue building, muscles, some hormones, and enzymes. They are acquired through food or supplementation [75]. Returning to the analogy used to explain the relationship of amino acids (bricks) to proteins (walls), amino acids are more easily absorbed by the body than proteins. This is because proteins are larger and more complex structures, while amino acids consist of a simpler structure [76,77].

4. Algae Proteins and Amino Acids

4.1. Bioactive Proteins and Amino Acids Derived from Algae

Algae proteins offer a fascinating nutritional composition, characterized by unique amino acid profiles and an array of bioactive compounds [78]. These marine algae, known for their rich biodiversity, have garnered increasing attention for their potential as sustainable and nutritious food sources [21]. One notable aspect of seaweed proteins is their amino acid composition. While the exact profile varies among different species, seaweeds typically contain a wide range of essential and non-essential amino acids [79]. Essential amino acids are those that the human body cannot synthesize on its own and must be obtained through diet. Seaweeds often provide a balanced mix of these essential amino acids, making them valuable components of a balanced diet [80].
Moreover, seaweed proteins are known for their high digestibility and bioavailability. Compared to proteins from terrestrial sources, such as meat or legumes, seaweed proteins are often easier for the body to break down and absorb. This digestibility makes them particularly suitable for individuals with digestive issues or those seeking alternative protein sources [81].
In addition to amino acids, algae proteins contain a variety of bioactive compounds with potential health benefits. These compounds include polysaccharides, peptides, polyphenols, vitamins, and minerals [82]. Some of these bioactive compounds exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties, contributing to the overall health-promoting effects of seaweed consumption [83]. One noteworthy bioactive compound found in seaweed proteins is phycocyanin, a pigment responsible for the blue-green color of certain seaweeds. Phycocyanin has been studied for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which may have implications for various aspects of human health, including cardiovascular health and immune function [84]. Arthrospira platensis (Cyanobacteria) is a well-known blue-green algae that contains high levels of phycocyanin. In addition to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, spirulina has been studied for its potential to improve lipid profiles, reduce blood pressure, and enhance immune function [85]. Aphanizomenon flos-aquae is a blue-green algae found in freshwater lakes, and like spirulina, this species contains significant amounts of phycocyanin, which contributes to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This species has been studied for its potential to support cognitive function, improve mood, and enhance overall well-being [86]. Nostoc commune (Cyanobacteria), commonly found in terrestrial habitats, including soil and rocks, produces phycocyanin along with other bioactive compounds. Studies suggest that N. commune extracts may have antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties, although further research is needed to elucidate their full therapeutic potential [87]. These examples illustrate how algae species containing phycocyanin offer a range of health benefits, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, which may support cardiovascular health, immune function, and overall well-being [85].
Furthermore, seaweeds are often low in fat and calories, making them an attractive option for individuals seeking to manage their weight or reduce their intake of saturated fats [80]. Incorporating seaweed proteins into the diet can offer a nutrient-dense alternative to traditional protein sources, contributing to a well-rounded and healthy eating pattern [88]. The nutritional composition of algae proteins, including their amino acid profiles and bioactive compounds, underscores their potential as valuable additions to the human diet [89].
As research in this field continues to expand, further exploration of the health benefits and culinary applications of seaweed proteins promises to enhance our understanding of their role in promoting overall health and well-being. For example, Irish moss (Chondrus crispus) (Figure 4), a red alga commonly found in the Atlantic Ocean, contains a moderate amount of protein, along with carrageenan, a polysaccharide used as a thickening agent in food products. Irish moss is also rich in vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants and has been traditionally used to support respiratory health and digestive function [90,91]. Sea lettuce (Ulva spp.), a green macroalgae that grows abundantly along coastlines worldwide, contains a moderate amount of protein and is rich in vitamins A, C, and K, as well as minerals like iron and iodine. Sea lettuce also contains chlorophyll and polyphenols, which have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and may contribute to overall health and well-being [52].
Hijiki (Sargassum fusiforme), a brown macroalgae often used in Japanese cuisine, contains a moderate amount of protein along with dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and iron. Hijiki also contains fucoidan, a polysaccharide with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may support immune function and cardiovascular health [62]. Dulse (Palmaria palmata) (Figure 5) is a red macroalga with a protein content that varies between 20% and 30% of its dry weight. While not as protein-rich as spirulina, dulse still provides a valuable source of dietary protein along with vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. Dulse contains unique compounds such as polyphenols and polysaccharides, which have been studied for their potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [92].
Kombu (Laminaria/Saccharina spp.) (Figure 6) is a brown macroalgae that contains a moderate amount of protein along with various vitamins, minerals, and fiber. While not as protein-rich as spirulina, kelp provides valuable dietary protein and essential nutrients. It is also a rich source of iodine, which is essential for thyroid function and metabolism regulation [93].
Wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) (Figure 7) is a brown seaweed commonly used in Asian cuisine, particularly in Japanese dishes. While wakame is often praised for its delicious taste and unique texture, it also offers numerous health benefits. Wakame is low in calories and fat but rich in essential nutrients. It contains vitamins such as vitamin A, vitamin C, and various B vitamins. Wakame also provides minerals including calcium, magnesium, iodine, and iron, making it a nutrient-dense food choice [94]. While wakame is not as protein-rich as some other types of seaweed, like spirulina, it still contains a moderate amount of protein. Protein is essential for building and repairing tissues, supporting immune function, and maintaining overall health. Wakame is also a good source of dietary fiber, which is important for digestive health and regular bowel movements. Fiber can also help promote feelings of fullness and may aid in weight management by reducing calorie intake [95]. U. pinnatifida is particularly notable for its high iodine content. Iodine is essential for thyroid function and the production of thyroid hormones, which regulate metabolism and support growth and development. However, excessive iodine intake should be avoided, as it can lead to thyroid disorders [96]. Like other seaweeds, wakame contains antioxidants such as fucoxanthin and polyphenols. These compounds help protect cells from oxidative damage caused by free radicals and may have anti-inflammatory properties [97]. Consuming wakame may offer various health benefits, including supporting thyroid function, promoting heart health, and reducing inflammation. Some research also suggests that the compounds found in wakame may have anti-cancer properties, although more studies are needed to confirm these effects [98].

4.2. Extraction Methods and Processing Techniques

Compounds found in seaweed are diverse and multifaceted, contributing to both its nutritional value and functional properties. These compounds not only provide essential nutrients but also offer a range of health benefits [99]. For instance, proteins found in seaweed are vital for tissue repair, muscle growth, and immune function, while polysaccharides contribute to digestive health and may have prebiotic effects [100].
Extraction methods and processing techniques for obtaining seaweed proteins involve several stages aimed at efficiently isolating and purifying proteins from seaweed biomass. These methods often vary based on the specific properties of the seaweed species and the desired characteristics of the extracted proteins [101]. Aqueous extraction, one common method, utilizes water or saline solutions to solubilize proteins from seaweed biomass. This process involves maceration, filtration, and precipitation steps to separate proteins from other components like carbohydrates and lipids [102]. Alkaline extraction, on the other hand, employs alkaline solutions such as sodium hydroxide to disrupt cell walls and release proteins from the seaweed matrix [103]. Enzyme-assisted extraction involves the use of enzymes like proteases to break down protein structures and facilitate their extraction (see Table 2) [104].
Following extraction, processing techniques are employed to concentrate and purify seaweed proteins for various applications. Ultrafiltration, a popular method, utilizes membranes with specific pore sizes to concentrate proteins while removing unwanted impurities and contaminants [105]. Precipitation methods, such as salting out and acid precipitation, selectively precipitate proteins based on their solubility characteristics, allowing for further purification [106]. Drying techniques, including spray drying and freeze drying, remove moisture from protein concentrates to produce stable powders or flakes suitable for storage and transportation [107].
Extraction methods and processing techniques for obtaining seaweed proteins are pivotal for maximizing protein yield, purity, and functionality while minimizing energy consumption and environmental impact [108]. These methods continue to evolve with advances in technology, driving innovation in the utilization of seaweed proteins for a wide range of applications in food, feed, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology. Moreover, the sustainable nature of seaweed cultivation underscores its potential as a valuable resource for addressing global challenges in nutrition, health, and environmental sustainability [109].
It is vital to keep in mind that the processes and methods applied are determined by the specific goals regarding protein extraction as well as the specific target proteins’ characteristics. Protein biochemistry is constantly evolving as novel methods and technologies for enhanced protein extraction, purification, and analysis emerge. Studies from the literature have extensively investigated seaweed protein concentration and purification methods to optimize yield, purity, and functionality [104]. Research has explored the effectiveness of different extraction techniques, such as aqueous extraction, alkaline extraction, and enzyme-assisted extraction, in isolating proteins from seaweed biomass [106]. These studies often evaluate factors like extraction efficiency, protein yield, and preservation of protein functionality during processing [107]. Additionally, researchers have examined various processing techniques, including ultrafiltration, precipitation methods, and drying techniques, to further concentrate and purify seaweed proteins. By assessing the impact of these methods on protein quality and functionality, researchers aim to develop efficient and sustainable approaches for harnessing seaweed proteins for diverse applications in food, feed, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology [104].

5. Applications of Seaweed Proteins in Food Products, Dietary Supplements, and Biotechnological Industries

Seaweed proteins have gained increasing attention for their versatile applications in various industries, including food products, dietary supplements, and biotechnology. Here is an overview of how seaweed proteins are utilized in each of these sectors [110].
Seaweed proteins are used in a wide range of food products to enhance nutritional value, texture, and sensory attributes. They are often incorporated into plant-based and vegan food products as sustainable alternatives to animal-derived proteins [5]. Seaweed protein isolates and concentrates can be used in formulations for meat analogs, dairy alternatives, baked goods, snacks, and beverages. These proteins contribute to the protein content of food products while also providing essential amino acids and bioactive compounds [111]. Seaweed proteins can also act as emulsifiers, stabilizers, and texturizers, improving the texture and mouthfeel of food products [112].
Seaweed proteins are increasingly utilized in dietary supplements for their nutritional benefits and potential health-promoting properties. Protein powders and supplements containing seaweed proteins are marketed for athletes, fitness enthusiasts, and individuals looking to increase their protein intake. Seaweed protein supplements are also available in combination with other nutrients, vitamins, and minerals to support overall health and well-being [113]. Additionally, seaweed-based supplements may offer specific health benefits, such as supporting immune function, promoting digestive health, and enhancing skin and hair health [114].
The discussion on the assayed bioactivity of seaweed proteins and their potential implications for human health is reinforced by concrete examples showcasing their diverse range of beneficial properties [91]. For instance, studies have demonstrated the antioxidant capacity of seaweed proteins through assays measuring their ability to scavenge free radicals, such as the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay [84]. Certain seaweed proteins, like phycobiliproteins found in red algae, exhibit strong antioxidant activity, protecting cells from oxidative damage associated with aging and disease [115]. Additionally, research (see Khursheed et al., 2023 work [116]) has revealed the anti-inflammatory effects of seaweed proteins through in vitro and in vivo studies [85,116]. Furthermore, the antimicrobial and antiviral properties of seaweed proteins have been elucidated through experiments demonstrating their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and viruses. For instance, lectins isolated from green seaweeds have exhibited potent antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant strains [106]. These concrete examples underscore the potential of seaweed proteins to positively impact human health by combating oxidative stress, inflammation, and microbial infections, thereby offering novel avenues for preventive and therapeutic interventions in various diseases [84].
Seaweed proteins are valuable resources in biotechnological industries for various applications, including pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, and renewable energy. Seaweed extracts and protein isolates are used in the development of functional foods, dietary supplements, and pharmaceutical formulations targeting specific health conditions [8]. Biotechnological processes are also employed to extract bioactive compounds from seaweed proteins for use in skincare products, wound healing formulations, and anti-aging treatments [117]. Furthermore, seaweed biomass serves as a renewable source of bioenergy through processes like anaerobic digestion and bioethanol production [118].
Seaweed proteins offer diverse opportunities for innovation and product development across the food, dietary supplement, and biotechnological industries. Their sustainable production, nutritional value, and functional properties make them attractive ingredients for meeting consumer demand for healthier and more environmentally friendly products. As research and technology continue to advance, the potential applications of seaweed proteins are expected to expand further, contributing to the development of novel products and solutions that promote health, sustainability, and innovation [119].

5.1. Sustainability and Environmental Considerations in Seaweed Protein Production

Sustainability and environmental considerations are paramount in seaweed protein production, reflecting the growing awareness of the importance of responsible resource management and conservation. Seaweed cultivation and processing methods are designed to minimize environmental impact while maximizing efficiency and resource utilization [120].
Sustainable seaweed protein production begins with responsible cultivation practices. Seaweed is often farmed in coastal areas using methods such as rope cultivation or integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems. These cultivation methods minimize habitat disruption and avoid the use of harmful chemicals or fertilizers that can adversely affect marine ecosystems [121]. Furthermore, seaweed cultivation can help mitigate the effects of eutrophication by absorbing excess nutrients from the water, improving water quality, and promoting biodiversity [122].
Seaweed is an inherently sustainable crop due to its rapid growth rate, high productivity, and minimal resource requirements. Unlike land-based crops, seaweed cultivation does not require arable land, freshwater, or chemical inputs such as pesticides and fertilizers. Seaweed absorbs nutrients directly from seawater and utilizes sunlight for photosynthesis, making it highly efficient in resource utilization [123]. Additionally, seaweed farming can be integrated with other aquaculture practices, such as fish or shellfish farming, to create synergies and minimize waste [122].
Seaweed plays a crucial role in carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. Through photosynthesis, seaweed absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converts it into biomass, effectively removing carbon from the environment. Large-scale seaweed cultivation has the potential to sequester significant amounts of carbon and offset greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change mitigation efforts [11].
Sustainable seaweed protein production prioritizes biodiversity conservation and ecosystem health. Seaweed farms serve as artificial reefs, providing habitat and refuge for various marine species. By enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem resilience, seaweed cultivation helps maintain healthy marine ecosystems and supports fisheries productivity [124]. Additionally, sustainable harvesting practices ensure that seaweed populations are not depleted beyond their natural capacity to regenerate, preserving ecosystem balance and integrity [125].
Proper waste management is essential in seaweed protein production to minimize environmental pollution and nutrient runoff. Seaweed processing facilities should implement measures to reduce, reuse, and recycle waste materials, such as byproducts from protein extraction and processing. Organic waste can be composted or used as fertilizer, while non-biodegradable waste should be disposed of responsibly to prevent pollution in coastal environments [126].
Sustainability and environmental considerations are integral to the production of seaweed proteins. By adopting responsible cultivation practices, maximizing resource efficiency, promoting carbon sequestration, preserving biodiversity, and implementing effective waste management strategies, the seaweed industry can minimize its ecological footprint and contribute to the long-term health and resilience of marine ecosystems [127]. Embracing sustainability principles ensures that seaweed protein production remains environmentally sound, socially responsible, and economically viable for generations to come [6].

5.2. Future Perspectives

Seaweed proteins represent a promising and sustainable solution for meeting global protein demands while addressing environmental, health, and societal challenges. As evidenced by their nutritional richness, functional versatility, and eco-friendly cultivation, seaweed proteins offer a viable alternative to conventional protein sources. With their rapid growth rates, minimal resource requirements, and ability to thrive in diverse marine environments, seaweeds are poised to play a pivotal role in the sustainable food systems of the future [5].
Moreover, the multifaceted applications of seaweed proteins across food, dietary supplements, and biotechnological industries underscore their potential to contribute to diverse and innovative product offerings. From plant-based meat alternatives to functional food ingredients and beyond, seaweed proteins offer a wide range of possibilities for creating nutritious, flavorful, and environmentally friendly products that resonate with consumers worldwide [110].
Looking ahead, several key areas warrant further exploration and development to fully realize the potential of seaweed proteins. Continued research is needed to better understand the nutritional composition, functional properties, and health benefits of seaweed proteins. Innovation in extraction methods, processing technologies, and product formulation will drive the development of novel seaweed-based products with improved taste, texture, and functionality [8,105].
Efforts to enhance the sustainability and scalability of seaweed cultivation practices are essential for meeting growing protein demands without compromising marine ecosystems or coastal communities. Investment in sustainable aquaculture infrastructure, resource management strategies, and certification programs can help ensure responsible seaweed farming practices globally [6,120].
Educating consumers about the nutritional value, environmental benefits, and culinary versatility of seaweed proteins is crucial for fostering market adoption and consumer acceptance. Strategic marketing campaigns, culinary initiatives, and product innovation can help raise awareness and build demand for seaweed-based products among diverse consumer segments [128,129].
Collaboration among governments, industry stakeholders, research institutions, and civil society is essential for fostering an enabling policy environment and supporting the growth of the seaweed protein industry. Policy frameworks that incentivize sustainable practices, promote research and development, and facilitate market access can accelerate the adoption of seaweed proteins as a mainstream protein source.
Seaweed proteins have the potential to play a transformative role in meeting global protein demands while advancing sustainability, health, and innovation in the food industry. By embracing a holistic approach that prioritizes sustainability, innovation, and collaboration, seaweed proteins can emerge as a cornerstone of future food systems, contributing to a healthier, more resilient, and more sustainable world [8].
As the worldwide demand for sustainable and plant-based food choices grows, seaweed proteins can play a significant part in meeting the requirements for protein while reducing harmful effects on the environment. Seaweed proteins can be utilized to generate novel plant-based food products such as animal replacements, dairy substitutes, and baked foods. Collaborations involving scientists, seaweed farmers, food companies, and biotechnology companies can encourage innovation and speed the development of seaweed protein uses. While the potential for seaweed proteins is enormous, issues regarding flavor acceptability, production on a large scale, and cost-effectiveness must be tackled. Continuous research, investments, and cooperation throughout domains is going to be critical in achieving the full potential of seaweed proteins to shape the foreseeable future of sustainable and healthy food resources.

6. Conclusions

The seaweed proteins and amino acids possess multiple health benefits, including antihypertensive, antioxidant, antidiabetic, antiatherosclerosis, anti-inflammatory, antitumoral, antibacterial, antiviral, and neuroprotective properties, among many others. Humans are becoming more conscious today than ever regarding their well-being and diet, which has created a substantial market for high-value functional foods derived from natural sources rather than manufactured ingredients. However, proteins generated by seaweeds are not frequently used as ingredients in the food industry business, and few studies evaluating acceptance, harmful effects, allergy susceptibility, or microbial effects have been undertaken for seaweed.
As science and technology in this area progress, algae-based proteins can become increasingly common among alternative protein sources, contributing to the overall sustainability of the food system. Although more research and investigation need to be performed, developments in new technologies must be centered around discovering valuable compounds that promote health and removing biochemical/microbiological dangers, among other present challenges such as sustainable aquaculture and seaweed processing and preparation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, L.P., J.C. and A.M.G.; visualization, J.C.; supervision, L.P. and A.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. by project reference UIDB/04004/2020 and DOI identifier 10.54499/UIDB/04004/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/04004/2020). This work was supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. by project reference UIDP/04004/2020 and DOI identifier 10.54499/UIDP/04004/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/04004/2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Galanakis, C.M. The Future of Food. Foods 2024, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Healy, L.E.; Zhu, X.; Pojić, M.; Sullivan, C.; Tiwari, U.; Curtin, J.; Tiwari, B.K. Biomolecules from Macroalgae—Nutritional Profile and Bioactives for Novel Food Product Development. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Polyak, E.; Breitenbach, Z.; Frank, E.; Mate, O.; Figler, M.; Zsalig, D.; Simon, K.; Szijarto, M.; Szabo, Z. Food and Sustainability: Is It a Matter of Choice? Sustainability 2023, 15, 7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Espinosa-Ramírez, J.; Mondragón-Portocarrero, A.C.; Rodríguez, J.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Santos, E.M. Algae as a potential source of protein meat alternatives. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1254300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mahadevan, K. Chapter 13—Seaweeds: A sustainable food source. In Seaweed Sustainability; Tiwari, B.K., Troy, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pereira, L.; Cotas, J. Seaweed: A sustainable solution for greening drug manufacturing in the pursuit of sustainable healthcare. Explor Drug Sci. 2024, 2, 50–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ross, F.W.R.; Boyd, P.W.; Filbee-Dexter, K.; Watanabe, K.; Ortega, A.; Krause-Jensen, D.; Lovelock, C.; Sondak, C.F.A.; Bach, L.T.; Duarte, C.M.; et al. Potential role of seaweeds in climate change mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Thiviya, P.; Gamage, A.; Gama-Arachchige, N.S.; Merah, O.; Madhujith, T. Seaweeds as a Source of Functional Proteins. Phycology 2022, 2, 216–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reynolds, D.; Caminiti, J.; Edmundson, S.; Gao, S.; Wick, M.; Huesemann, M. Seaweed proteins are nutritionally valuable components in the human diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cotas, J.; Lomartire, S.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.; Pereira, L. From Ocean to Medicine: Harnessing Seaweed’s Potential for Drug Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farghali, M.; Mohamed, I.M.A.; Osman, A.I.; Rooney, D.W. Seaweed for climate mitigation, wastewater treatment, bioenergy, bioplastic, biochar, food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 97–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duarte, C.M.; Bruhn, A.; Krause-Jensen, D. A seaweed aquaculture imperative to meet global sustainability targets. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 5, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saravanan, P.; Chatterjee, A.; Bhowmick, G.D. Diverse Roles of Seaweed in the Blue Carbon Economy and Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Review. Green Low-Carbon Econ. 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hefferon, K.L.; De Steur, H.; Perez-Cueto, F.J.A.; Herring, R. Alternative protein innovations and challenges for industry and consumer: An initial overview. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1038286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Laso, J.; Ruiz-Salmón, I.; Margallo, M.; Villanueva-Rey, P.; Poceiro, L.; Quinteiro, P.; Dias, A.C.; Almeida, C.; Marques, A.; Entrena-Barbero, E.; et al. Achieving Sustainability of the Seafood Sector in the European Atlantic Area by Addressing Eco-Social Challenges: The NEPTUNUS Project. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leandro, A.; Pacheco, D.; Cotas, J.; Marques, J.C.; Pereira, L.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. Seaweed’s Bioactive Candidate Compounds to Food Industry and Global Food Security. Life 2020, 10, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kamal, M.; Abdel-Raouf, N.; Alwutayd, K.; AbdElgawad, H.; Abdelhameed, M.S.; Hammouda, O.; Elsayed, K.N.M. Seasonal Changes in the Biochemical Composition of Dominant Macroalgal Species along the Egyptian Red Sea Shore. Biology 2023, 12, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, K.S.; Kumari, S.; Singh, K.; Kushwaha, P. Influence of Seasonal Variation on Chemical Composition and Nutritional Profiles of Macro- and Microalgae. In Recent Advances in Micro and Macroalgal Processing; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 14–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sasaki, Y.; Yoshikuni, Y. Metabolic engineering for valorization of macroalgae biomass. Metab. Eng. 2022, 71, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Badmus, U.O.; Taggart, M.A.; Boyd, K.G. The effect of different drying methods on certain nutritionally important chemical constituents in edible brown seaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 3883–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.Y.; Tso, R.; Teo, H.S.; Haldar, S. The utility of algae as sources of high value nutritional ingredients, particularly for alternative/complementary proteins to improve human health. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1277343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jomova, K.; Makova, M.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Rhodes, C.J.; Valko, M. Essential metals in health and disease. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022, 367, 110173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lozano Muñoz, I.; Díaz, N.F. Minerals in edible seaweed: Health benefits and food safety issues. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 1592–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Authority, E.F.S.; Dujardin, B.; Ferreira de Sousa, R.; Gómez Ruiz, J.Á. Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European population. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e07798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ghosh, S.; Sarkar, T.; Pati, S.; Kari, Z.A.; Edinur, H.A.; Chakraborty, R. Novel Bioactive Compounds from Marine Sources as a Tool for Functional Food Development. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 832957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Watanabe, F.; Takenaka, S.; Katsura, H.; Masumder, S.A.M.Z.H.; Abe, K.; Tamura, Y.; Nakano, Y. Dried Green and Purple Lavers (Nori) Contain Substantial Amounts of Biologically Active Vitamin B12 but Less of Dietary Iodine Relative to Other Edible Seaweeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 2341–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Niklewicz, A.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, A.; Holzer, A.; Klein, A.; McCaddon, A.; Molloy, A.M.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.R.; Nexo, E.; McNulty, H.; et al. The importance of vitamin B12 for individuals choosing plant-based diets. Eur. J. Nutr. 2023, 62, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fleurence, J. 9—Seaweed proteins. In Proteins in Food Processing; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2004; pp. 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Brien, R.; Hayes, M.; Sheldrake, G.; Tiwari, B.; Walsh, P. Macroalgal Proteins: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diaz, C.J.; Douglas, K.J.; Kang, K.; Kolarik, A.L.; Malinovski, R.; Torres-Tiji, Y.; Molino, J.V.; Badary, A.; Mayfield, S.P. Developing algae as a sustainable food source. Front. Nutr. 2023, 9, 1029841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mæhre, H.K.; Dalheim, L.; Edvinsen, G.K.; Elvevoll, E.O.; Jensen, I.-J. Protein Determination—Method Matters. Foods 2018, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Templeton, D.W.; Laurens, L.M.L. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors revisited for applications of microalgal biomass conversion to food, feed and fuel. Algal Res. 2015, 11, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Angell, A.R.; Mata, L.; de Nys, R.; Paul, N.A. The protein content of seaweeds: A universal nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of five. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lourenço, S.O.; Barbarino, E.; De-Paula, J.C.; Pereira, L.O.d.S.; Marquez, U.M.L. Amino acid composition, protein content and calculation of nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for 19 tropical seaweeds. Phycol. Res. 2002, 50, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reeds, P.J.; Garlick, P.J. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements and the Composition of Complementary Foods. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2953S–2961S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Machado, M.; Machado, S.; Pimentel, F.B.; Freitas, V.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Amino Acid Profile and Protein Quality Assessment of Macroalgae Produced in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System. Foods 2020, 9, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moustafa, Y.; Eladel, H. Amino acids profile of Ulva sp. macroalgae collected from Alexandria coast in Egypt: A potential food resource. Point J. Bot. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 1, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kazir, M.; Abuhassira, Y.; Robin, A.; Nahor, O.; Luo, J.; Israel, A.; Golberg, A.; Livney, Y.D. Extraction of proteins from two marine macroalgae, Ulva sp. and Gracilaria sp., for food application, and evaluating digestibility, amino acid composition and antioxidant properties of the protein concentrates. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Milinovic, J.; Mata, P.; Diniz, M.; Noronha, J.P. Umami taste in edible seaweeds: The current comprehension and perception. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2021, 23, 100301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Figueroa, V.; Bunger, A.; Ortiz, J.; Aguilera, J.M. Sensory descriptors for three edible Chilean seaweeds and their relations to umami components and instrumental texture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 3141–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Rajauria, G.; Miranda, M.; Sweeney, T.; Lopez-Alonso, M.; O’Doherty, J. Seasonal Variation of the Proximate Composition, Mineral Content, Fatty Acid Profiles and Other Phytochemical Constituents of Selected Brown Macroalgae. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tabarsa, M.; Rezaei, M.; Ramezanpour, Z.; Robert Waaland, J.; Rabiei, R. Fatty Acids, Amino Acids, Mineral Contents, and Proximate Composition of Some Brown Seaweeds. J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stefan, K. Algal Polysaccharides, Novel Applications and Outlook. In Carbohydrates; Chuan-Fa, C., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; Chapter 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bocanegra, A.; Macho-González, A.; Garcimartín, A.; Benedí, J.; Sánchez-Muniz, F.J. Whole Alga, Algal Extracts, and Compounds as Ingredients of Functional Foods: Composition and Action Mechanism Relationships in the Prevention and Treatment of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wells, M.L.; Potin, P.; Craigie, J.S.; Raven, J.A.; Merchant, S.S.; Helliwell, K.E.; Smith, A.G.; Camire, M.E.; Brawley, S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 949–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Syakilla, N.; George, R.; Chye, F.Y.; Pindi, W.; Mantihal, S.; Wahab, N.A.; Fadzwi, F.M.; Gu, P.H.; Matanjun, P. A Review on Nutrients, Phytochemicals, and Health Benefits of Green Seaweed, Caulerpa lentillifera. Foods 2022, 11, 2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kasmiati, K.; Syahrul, S.; Badraeni, B.; Rahmi, M. Proximate and mineral compositions of the green seaweeds Caulerpa lentilifera and Caulerpa racemosa from South Sulawesi Coast, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1119, 012049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Magdugo, R.P.; Terme, N.; Lang, M.; Pliego-Cortés, H.; Marty, C.; Hurtado, A.Q.; Bedoux, G.; Bourgougnon, N. An Analysis of the Nutritional and Health Values of Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskål) and Ulva fasciata (Delile)—Two Chlorophyta Collected from the Philippines. Molecules 2020, 25, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pereira, L. Edible Seaweeds of the World, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pereira, L. Atlantic algae as food and their extracts. Explor. Foods Foodomics 2023, 1, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Paiva, L.; Lima, E.; Neto, A.I.; Marcone, M.; Baptista, J. Nutritional and Functional Bioactivity Value of Selected Azorean Macroalgae: Ulva compressa, Ulva rigida, Gelidium microdon, and Pterocladiella capillacea. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 1757–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rasyid, A. Evaluation of Nutritional Composition of The Dried Seaweed Ulva lactuca from Pameungpeuk Waters, Indonesia. Trop Life Sci Res. 2017, 28, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xu, J.; Liao, W.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, C. An overview on the nutritional and bioactive components of green seaweeds. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2023, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Benjama, O.; Payap, M. Nutritional composition and physicochemical properties of two green seaweeds (Ulva pertusa and U. intestinalis) from the Pattani Bay in Southern Thailand. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 33, 575–583. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ratana-arporn, P.; Chirapart, A. Nutritional Evaluation of Tropical Green Seaweeds Caulerpa lentillifera and Ulva reticulata. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2006, 40, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stévant, P.; Marfaing, H.; Rustad, T.; Sandbakken, I.; Fleurence, J.; Chapman, A. Nutritional value of the kelps Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima and effects of short-term storage on biomass quality. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2417–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pereira, L. A Review of the Nutrient Composition of Selected Edible Seaweeds. In Seaweed: Ecology, Nutrient Composition and Medicinal Uses; Pomin, V.H., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 15–47. [Google Scholar]
  58. Patarra, R.F.; Paiva, L.; Neto, A.I.; Lima, E.; Baptista, J. Nutritional value of selected macroalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lorenzo, J.M.; Agregán, R.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Franco, D.; Carballo, J.; Şahin, S.; Lacomba, R.; Barba, F.J. Proximate Composition and Nutritional Value of Three Macroalgae: Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus vesiculosus and Bifurcaria bifurcata. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ilyas, Z.; Ali Redha, A.; Wu, Y.S.; Ozeer, F.Z.; Aluko, R.E. Nutritional and Health Benefits of the Brown Seaweed Himanthalia elongata. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2023, 78, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Larsen, B.A.; Hawkins, W.W. Nutritional value as protein of some of the nitrogenous constituents of two marine algae, Chondrus crispus and Laminaria digitata. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1961, 12, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hwang, J.-H.; Kim, N.-G.; Woo, H.C.; Rha, S.j.; Kim, S.-J.; Shin, T.-S. Variation in the Chemical Composition of Saccharina japonica with Harvest Area and Culture Period. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2014, 5, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Meinita, M.D.N.; Harwanto, D.; Sohn, J.-H.; Kim, J.-S.; Choi, J.-S. Hizikia fusiformis: Pharmacological and Nutritional Properties. Foods 2021, 10, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Taboada, M.C.; Millán, R.; Miguez, M.I. Nutritional value of the marine algae wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and nori (Porphyra purpurea) as food supplements. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1271–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ortiz, J.; Uquiche, E.; Robert, P.; Romero, N.; Quitral, V.; Llantén, C. Functional and nutritional value of the Chilean seaweeds Codium fragile, Gracilaria chilensis and Macrocystis pyrifera. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2009, 111, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Galland-Irmouli, A.-V.; Fleurence, J.; Lamghari, R.; Luçon, M.; Rouxel, C.; Barbaroux, O.; Bronowicki, J.-P.; Villaume, C.; Guéant, J.-L. Nutritional value of proteins from edible seaweed Palmaria palmata (dulse). J. Nutr. Biochem. 1999, 10, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hwang, E.S.; Ki, K.N.; Chung, H.Y. Proximate composition, amino Acid, mineral, and heavy metal content of dried laver. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 18, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gamero-Vega, G.; Palacios, M.; Quitral, V. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Compounds of Red Seaweed: A Mini-Review. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2020, 8, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hyun, J.; Lee, S.-W.; Jeong, H.H.; Kim, J.-I. Comparative study on antioxidant activity of Gold 1, a new strain of Pyropia yezoensis. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2023, 26, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zarándi, M.; Szolomájer, J. Amino acids: Chemistry, diversity and physical properties. In Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins; Ryadnov, M., Hudecz, F., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2017; Volume 42, pp. 1–84. ISBN 978-1-78801-002-3. [Google Scholar]
  71. Fleck, M.; Petrosyan, A.M. Introduction. In Salts of Amino Acids: Crystallization, Structure and Properties; Fleck, M., Petrosyan, A.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ahluwalia, V.K.; Kumar, L.S.; Kumar, S. Amino Acids. In Chemistry of Natural Products: Amino Acids, Peptides, Proteins and Enzymes; Ahluwalia, V.K., Kumar, L.S., Kumar, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Martínez-Rodríguez, S.; Torres, J.M.; Sánchez, P.; Ortega, E. Overview on Multienzymatic Cascades for the Production of Non-canonical α-Amino Acids. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 559892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Castro, T.G.; Melle-Franco, M.; Sousa, C.E.A.; Cavaco-Paulo, A.; Marcos, J.C. Non-Canonical Amino Acids as Building Blocks for Peptidomimetics: Structure, Function, and Applications. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hou, Y.; Yin, Y.; Wu, G. Dietary essentiality of “nutritionally non-essential amino acids” for animals and humans. Exp. Biol. Med. 2015, 240, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cruzat, V.; Macedo Rogero, M.; Noel Keane, K.; Curi, R.; Newsholme, P. Glutamine: Metabolism and Immune Function, Supplementation and Clinical Translation. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Morris, R.; Black, K.A.; Stollar, E.J. Uncovering protein function: From classification to complexes. Essays Biochem. 2022, 66, 255–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wu, G. Functional Amino Acids in Growth, Reproduction, and Health. Adv. Nutr. 2010, 1, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Fleurence, J.; Morançais, M.; Dumay, J. 9—Seaweed proteins. In Proteins in Food Processing, 2nd ed.; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Černá, M. Chapter 24—Seaweed Proteins and Amino Acids as Nutraceuticals. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research; Kim, S.-K., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011; Volume 64, pp. 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Mohamed, H.I.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Barqawi, A.A.; Mansour, A.T. Phytochemical and Potential Properties of Seaweeds and Their Recent Applications: A Review. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bleakley, S.; Hayes, M. Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production. Foods 2017, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lafarga, T.; Acién-Fernández, F.G.; Garcia-Vaquero, M. Bioactive peptides and carbohydrates from seaweed for food applications: Natural occurrence, isolation, purification, and identification. Algal Res. 2020, 48, 101909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Michalak, I.; Tiwari, R.; Dhawan, M.; Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Sharun, K.; Emran, T.B.; Dhama, K. Antioxidant effects of seaweeds and their active compounds on animal health and production—A review. Vet. Q. 2022, 42, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Romay, C.; Armesto, J.; Remirez, D.; González, R.; Ledon, N.; García, I. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of C-phycocyanin from blue-green algae. Inflamm. Res. 1998, 47, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Fernandes, R.; Campos, J.; Serra, M.; Fidalgo, J.; Almeida, H.; Casas, A.; Toubarro, D.; Barros, A.I.R.N.A. Exploring the Benefits of Phycocyanin: From Spirulina Cultivation to Its Widespread Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Benedetti, S.; Benvenuti, F.; Pagliarani, S.; Francogli, S.; Scoglio, S.; Canestrari, F. Antioxidant properties of a novel phycocyanin extract from the blue-green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae. Life Sci. 2004, 75, 2353–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Li, Z.; Guo, M. Healthy efficacy of Nostoc commune Vaucher. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 14669–14679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Peñalver, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Ros, G.; Amarowicz, R.; Pateiro, M.; Nieto, G. Seaweeds as a Functional Ingredient for a Healthy Diet. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mosibo, O.K.; Ferrentino, G.; Udenigwe, C.C. Microalgae Proteins as Sustainable Ingredients in Novel Foods: Recent Developments and Challenges. Foods 2024, 13, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lomartire, S.; Marques, J.C.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. An Overview to the Health Benefits of Seaweeds Consumption. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stévant, P.; Schmedes, P.S.; Le Gall, L.; Wegeberg, S.; Dumay, J.; Rebours, C. Concise review of the red macroalga dulse, Palmaria palmata (L.) Weber & Mohr. J. Appl. Phycol. 2023, 35, 523–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mouritsen, O.G.; Dawczynski, C.; Duelund, L.; Jahreis, G.; Vetter, W.; Schröder, M. On the human consumption of the red seaweed dulse (Palmaria palmata (L.) Weber & Mohr). J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1777–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sultana, F.; Wahab, M.A.; Nahiduzzaman, M.; Mohiuddin, M.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Shakil, A.; Mamun, A.-A.; Khan, M.S.R.; Wong, L.; Asaduzzaman, M. Seaweed farming for food and nutritional security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and women empowerment: A review. Aquac. Fish. 2023, 8, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. FAO. Undaria Pinnatifida. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Text by Shao Jun Pang, Xia Li and Thierry Chopin. Fisheries and Aquaculture Division [Online]. Rome. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/culturedspecies/undaria_pinnatifida/en (accessed on 8 March 2024).
  96. Choudhary, B.; Chauhan, O.P.; Mishra, A. Edible Seaweeds: A Potential Novel Source of Bioactive Metabolites and Nutraceuticals with Human Health Benefits. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 740054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Aakre, I.; Tveito Evensen, L.; Kjellevold, M.; Dahl, L.; Henjum, S.; Alexander, J.; Madsen, L.; Markhus, M.W. Iodine Status and Thyroid Function in a Group of Seaweed Consumers in Norway. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pereira, L.; Cotas, J. Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols and Other Micronutrients of Marine Origin. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Trigo, J.P.; Palmnäs-Bédard, M.; Juanola, M.V.-L.; Undeland, I. Effects of whole seaweed consumption on humans: Current evidence from randomized-controlled intervention trials, knowledge gaps, and limitations. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1226168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pereira, L.; Valado, A. Harnessing the power of seaweed: Unveiling the potential of marine algae in drug discovery. Explor. Drug Sci. 2023, 1, 475–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zang, L.; Baharlooeian, M.; Terasawa, M.; Shimada, Y.; Nishimura, N. Beneficial effects of seaweed-derived components on metabolic syndrome via gut microbiota modulation. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1173225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. O’ Connor, J.; Meaney, S.; Williams, G.A.; Hayes, M. Extraction of Protein from Four Different Seaweeds Using Three Different Physical Pre-Treatment Strategies. Molecules 2020, 25, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Arias, A.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T. Macroalgae biorefineries as a sustainable resource in the extraction of value-added compounds. Algal Res. 2023, 69, 102954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. de Souza Celente, G.; Sui, Y.; Acharya, P. Seaweed as an alternative protein source: Prospective protein extraction technologies. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 86, 103374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gouseti, O.; Larsen, M.E.; Amin, A.; Bakalis, S.; Petersen, I.L.; Lametsch, R.; Jensen, P.E. Applications of Enzyme Technology to Enhance Transition to Plant Proteins: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Echave, J.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Garcia-Perez, P.; Popović-Djordjević, J.; Avdović, E.H.; Radulović, M.; Xiao, J.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Seaweed Protein Hydrolysates and Bioactive Peptides: Extraction, Purification, and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Du, M.; Hou, Z.; Liu, L.; Xuan, Y.; Chen, X.; Fan, L.; Li, Z.; Xu, B. 1Progress, applications, challenges and prospects of protein purification technology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1028691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhao, Q.; Xiong, H.; Selomulya, C.; Chen, X.D.; Huang, S.; Ruan, X.; Zhou, Q.; Sun, W. Effects of Spray Drying and Freeze Drying on the Properties of Protein Isolate from Rice Dreg Protein. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Quitério, E.; Grosso, C.; Ferraz, R.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Soares, C. A Critical Comparison of the Advanced Extraction Techniques Applied to Obtain Health-Promoting Compounds from Seaweeds. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jiménez-González, C.; Agrasar, A.M.T.; Mallo, F.; Rúa, M.L.; Fuciños, C. Red seaweed proteins: Valuable marine-origin compounds with encouraging applications. Algal Res. 2023, 75, 103262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, W.; Boateng, I.D.; Xu, J. Novel marine proteins as a global protein supply and human nutrition: Extraction, bioactivities, potential applications, safety assessment, and deodorization technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 143, 104283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kurek, M.A.; Onopiuk, A.; Pogorzelska-Nowicka, E.; Szpicer, A.; Zalewska, M.; Półtorak, A. Novel Protein Sources for Applications in Meat-Alternative Products—Insight and Challenges. Foods 2022, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sumartini; Gurusmatika, S.; Amira, W. The Effect of Food Additive on Physicochemical Characteristics of Seaweed Stick Snack and Consumer Acceptance. Canrea 2021, 4, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Korivi, M.; Chen, C.-T.; Yu, S.-H.; Ye, W.; Cheng, I.S.; Chang, J.-S.; Kuo, C.-H.; Hou, C.-W. Seaweed Supplementation Enhances Maximal Muscular Strength and Attenuates Resistance Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 3528932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Chen, H.; Qi, H.; Xiong, P. Phycobiliproteins—A Family of Algae-Derived Biliproteins: Productions, Characterization and Pharmaceutical Potentials. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Khursheed, M.; Ghelani, H.; Jan, R.K.; Adrian, T.E. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Bioactive Compounds from Seaweeds, Bryozoans, Jellyfish, Shellfish and Peanut Worms. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Suraiya, S.; Ahmmed, M.K.; Haq, M. Immunity boosting roles of biofunctional compounds available in aquafoods: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Jesumani, V.; Du, H.; Aslam, M.; Pei, P.; Huang, N. Potential Use of Seaweed Bioactive Compounds in Skincare—A Review. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Fasahati, P.; Dickson, R.; Saffron, C.M.; Woo, H.C.; Liu, J.J. Seaweeds as a sustainable source of bioenergy: Techno-economic and life cycle analyses of its biochemical conversion pathways. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kumar, A.; Hanjabam, M.D.; Kishore, P.; Uchoi, D.; Panda, S.K.; Mohan, C.O.; Chatterjee, N.S.; Zynudheen, A.A.; Ravishankar, C.N. Exploitation of Seaweed Functionality for the Development of Food Products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 1873–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. United Nations Environment Programme. Seaweed Farming: Assessment on the Potential of Sustainable Upscaling for Climate, Communities and the Planet. Nairobi. Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/42642/seaweed_farming_climate.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y (accessed on 9 March 2024).
  122. Koesling, M.; Kvadsheim, N.P.; Halfdanarson, J.; Emblemsvåg, J.; Rebours, C. Environmental impacts of protein-production from farmed seaweed: Comparison of possible scenarios in Norway. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cotas, J.; Gomes, L.; Pacheco, D.; Pereira, L. Ecosystem Services Provided by Seaweeds. Hydrobiology 2023, 2, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Campbell, I.; Macleod, A.; Sahlmann, C.; Neves, L.; Funderud, J.; Øverland, M.; Hughes, A.D.; Stanley, M. The Environmental Risks Associated with the Development of Seaweed Farming in Europe—Prioritizing Key Knowledge Gaps. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Spillias, S.; von Herzen, B.; Holmgren, D. Marine permaculture: Design principles for productive seascapes. One Earth 2024, 7, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lotze, H.K.; Milewski, I.; Fast, J.; Kay, L.; Worm, B. Ecosystem-based management of seaweed harvesting. Bot. Mar. 2019, 62, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Panday, D.; Bhusal, N.; Das, S.; Ghalehgolabbehbahani, A. Rooted in Nature: The Rise, Challenges, and Potential of Organic Farming and Fertilizers in Agroecosystems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bin Abu Sofian, A.D.A.; Lim, H.R.; Manickam, S.; Ang, W.L.; Show, P.L. Towards a Sustainable Circular Economy: Algae-Based Bioplastics and the Role of Internet-of-Things and Machine Learning. ChemBioEng Rev. 2024, 11, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Blikra, M.J.; Altintzoglou, T.; Løvdal, T.; Rognså, G.; Skipnes, D.; Skåra, T.; Sivertsvik, M.; Noriega Fernández, E. Seaweed products for the future: Using current tools to develop a sustainable food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Red alga, Porphyra umbilicalis. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 1. Red alga, Porphyra umbilicalis. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g001
Figure 2. Green alga, Ulva rigida. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 2. Green alga, Ulva rigida. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g002
Figure 3. Red alga Gracilaria gracilis. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 3. Red alga Gracilaria gracilis. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g003
Figure 4. Red alga, Chondrus crispus. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 4. Red alga, Chondrus crispus. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g004
Figure 5. Red alga, Palmaria palmata. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 5. Red alga, Palmaria palmata. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g005
Figure 6. Brown alga Saccharina latissima. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 6. Brown alga Saccharina latissima. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g006
Figure 7. Brown alga, Undaria pinnatifida. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 7. Brown alga, Undaria pinnatifida. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Nutrients 16 01123 g007
Table 1. Nutrient composition of selected edible seaweed (% dry weight).
Table 1. Nutrient composition of selected edible seaweed (% dry weight).
SpeciesProtein Ash Dietary Fiber Carbohydrates Lipid Reference
Green seaweeds
Caulerpa lentillifera 12.56–14.76 25.31–63.83 33.44–37.16 2.32–50.71 0.86–1.70 [45,46]
Caulerpa racemosa17.8–19.97–29.464.933–414.5–9.8[46,47,48]
Codium fragile8–1121–395.139–670-5–1.5[48,49]
Ulva compressa15.66–2718.03–18.633–4514.45–48.20.3–1.67[48,49,50]
Ulva lactuca10–2511.2–12.928.4–3836–58.10.6–1.6[48,51]
Ulva australis (formerly U. pertusa)14.6–2625.9–28.652.2–59.047.02.1–7.4[48,52,53]
Ulva rigida15.78–19.020.6–28.638–4117.62–560.9–2.0[48,49,50]
Ulva reticulata17–21.0617.5865.750–581.7–2.3[48,54]
Brown seaweeds
Alaria esculenta9–2024.242.8640.7–511–2[48,55]
Eisenia bicyclis7.59.7210–1260.60.1[48,56]
Fucus spiralis 9.7–10.77 - 63.88 17.65.23[48,57]
Fucus vesiculosus3–1414–3045–5946.81.9–3.75[48,58]
Himanthalia elongata5–1530–3633–53.344–610.5–1.1[48,59]
Laminaria digitata8–1537.5937.3481.0[48,60]
Saccharina japonica5.72–7.515.11–26.6310–3651.9–66.191.0–1.69[48,61]
Saccharina latissima6–2626.2–34.783052–610.5–1.1[48,55]
Sargassum fusiforme11.6–18.4116.63–19.7711.3–6230.6–61.851.4–1.8[48,62]
Undaria pinnatifida12–2326–3916–4645–511.5–4.5[48,63]
Red seaweeds
Chondrus crispus11–2121.0810–3455–681.0–3.0[48]
Gracilaria chilensis13.718.9-66.11.3[48,64]
Palmaria palmata8–3515–3028.5746–560.7–3[48,65]
Pyropia tenera (formerly Porphyra tenera)33–479.07–20.512–3544.30.7–2.25[48,66]
Porphyra umbilicalis29–4010–1229–35430.2–0.3[48,67]
Pyropia yezoensis31–51.417.848.644.4–50.692.1[48,68]
Table 2. Protein extraction methods and reported protein yields (% dry weight). Adapted from O’Brien et al., 2022 [29].
Table 2. Protein extraction methods and reported protein yields (% dry weight). Adapted from O’Brien et al., 2022 [29].
SpeciesExtraction Methods Protein Extracted (% Dry Weight)
Alaria esculenta (P) High-pressure extraction 15%
Alaria esculenta (P)Autoclave extraction17.1%
Ascophyllum nodosum (P)Chemical extraction7.97–16.90%
Chondracanthus chamissoi (R)Enzyme extraction with α-amylase, cellulose, and pectinase36.1%
Chondrus crispus (R)Osmotic shock35.5%
Chondrus crispus (R)Enzyme extraction with cellulose7.1%
Codium tomentosum (C)Ultrasound extraction and enzyme extraction with viscozyme® L, cellulose (EC 232.734.4), alcalase® (EC 3.4.21.14), and favourzyme® (EC 232.752.2)16.9–18.8%
Fucus vesiculosus (P)Autoclave extraction24.3%
Fucus vesiculosus (P)High-pressure extraction23.7%
Himanthalia elongata (P)Chemical extraction6.5%
Palmaria palmata (R)Enzyme extraction with Umamizyme TM and xylanase33.4%
Palmaria palmata (R)Enzyme extraction with Celluclast (EC 232-734-4), Shearzyme®, alcalase®, and viscozyme®35.5–41.6%
Palmaria palmata (R) Autoclave 21.5%
Porphyra umbilicalis (R)Chemical extraction22.5%
Pyropia acanthophora (R)Homogenisation and protein precipitation8.9%
Pyropia tenera (R)Enzyme extraction with Prolyve®1000, and Flavourzym®23%
Saccharina japonica (P)Enzyme extraction with AMG, Celluclast, Dextrozyme, Promozyme®, Viscozyme®, Alcalase®, Flavourzyme®, Neutrase, Protamex®, and pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1)6.94–22.5%
Saccharina latissima (P)Chemical extraction9%
Sargassum spp. (P)Enzyme extraction with cellulose and β-glucosidase10.2%
Sargassum wightii (P)Chemical extraction8–12.2%
Ulva spp. (C)Chemical extraction8–12.2%
Ulva lactuca (C)pH shift extraction with pH 2 and pH 1322.7%
Ulva lactuca (C)Enzyme extraction with papain (EC 3.4. 22.2)69.19%
Ulva lactuca (C)Enzyme extraction with endopeptidase, cellulase, xylanase, β-glucanase, arabanase6.2–10.1%
Ulva ohnoi (C)Solvent extraction12.28–21.57%
C—Chlorophyta; P—Phaeophyceae; R—Rhodophyta.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, L.; Cotas, J.; Gonçalves, A.M. Seaweed Proteins: A Step towards Sustainability? Nutrients 2024, 16, 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081123

AMA Style

Pereira L, Cotas J, Gonçalves AM. Seaweed Proteins: A Step towards Sustainability? Nutrients. 2024; 16(8):1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Leonel, João Cotas, and Ana Marta Gonçalves. 2024. "Seaweed Proteins: A Step towards Sustainability?" Nutrients 16, no. 8: 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop