Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Bioactive-Substance-Based Interventions for Adults with MASLD: Results from a Systematic Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Application and Mechanism Analysis of Enteral Nutrition in Clinical Management of Chronic Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts

1
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
2
School of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
5
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7232, USA
6
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(3), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030451
Submission received: 6 January 2025 / Revised: 18 January 2025 / Accepted: 24 January 2025 / Published: 26 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vegetarian Dietary Patterns in the Prevention of Metabolic Syndrome)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: While previous study results have suggested an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes with potato consumption, limited and inconsistent results are available on the association of potato consumption with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hypertension (HTN). We assessed the associations of (i) total potato consumption with the risk of CVD and HTN as the primary aim and (ii) fried potatoes and combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes with the risk of CVD and HTN as the secondary aim. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis using data from seven cohorts for CVD (n = 110,063) and five cohorts for HTN (n = 67,146). Cox regression was used to estimate multivariable adjusted hazard ratios separately in each cohort and the cohort-specific results were meta-analyzed using an inverse-variance weighted method. Results: The mean age ranged from 25 to 72 years, 65% of the respondents were women, and the mean consumption of total potatoes ranged from 1.9 to 4.3 times per week. In the primary analysis, total potato intake was not associated with the risk of either CVD or HTN: multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) comparing 5+ servings/week to no potato intake: 0.96 (0.89–1.04) for CVD and 1.04 (0.99–1.08) for HTN. In secondary analyses, the consumption of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes was not associated with CVD or HTN; while fried potato consumption was not associated with CVD risk, there was a 10% higher risk of HTN (95% CI: 4% to 17%) comparing 1+ servings/week to no fried potato intake. Conclusions: While the consumption of total potato was not associated with the risk of CVD or HTN risk, a modest elevated risk of HTN but not CVD was observed only with fried potato consumption.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains one of the leading causes of death in the US and is associated with high costs [1,2,3]. Hypertension (HTN) is highly prevalent in the US and about three in four Americans will develop HTN during their lifetime [4]. Downstream consequences of HTN, including CVD, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure, contribute to high healthcare expenditure and reduced quality of life [1]. For these reasons, it is important to identify modifiable determinants of both CVD and HTN in order to reduce the burden of both conditions. Previous studies have demonstrated the critical role of healthy diet in the prevention of HTN [5,6,7,8] and CVD [9,10,11,12]. Unfortunately, the proportion of Americans with an ideal diet based on the American Heart Association classification remains low (below 3% [13]). Potatoes are widely consumed in the US and worldwide [14] and data indicated a steady increase in the prevalence of consumption worldwide. Although potatoes have a high glycemic index, they also have low energy density due to their high water content [15]. Limited and inconsistent data are available on associations of total potato consumption with the risk of CVD [16,17,18] and HTN [16]. Very few studies have evaluated associations of baked, boiled, mashed, or fried potatoes with CVD or HTN. We reported a higher incidence of CHD with 5+ cups of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes per week in the Million Veteran Program [19], contrary to a recent meta-analysis of six studies, which showed no association of total potato intake with CHD [16]. Heterogeneity across studies could be partially due to a lack of adequate adjustment for potential confounding factors or an inability to differentiate methods of potato preparation (i.e., baked, boiled, or mashed, or fried potatoes). The current study addressed some of those gaps by focusing primarily on associations of total potato consumption with the incidence of CVD and HTN in seven large US cohorts. As a secondary aim, we examined the associations of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes, as well as fried potato, consumption with the incidence of CVD and HTN.

2. Materials and Methods

Study Population: The current analyses are based on data collected on seven well-established prospective cohorts with data on both potato consumption and the incidence of CVD and/or HTN. Within each cohort, subjects with a prevalent outcome or missing data on potato consumption were excluded. Below is a brief description of the participating cohorts.
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is a prospective cohort study of 15,792 participants designed to investigate the etiology of atherosclerosis and its consequences. Details on the design and methods of the ARIC study were previously published [20].
The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study is a multicenter longitudinal study of 5115 subjects designed to identify risk factors of coronary artery disease. A detailed description of the CARDIA study was previously published [21].
The COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) is a randomized clinical trial designed to test the effects of multivitamins and cocoa extract supplements on cancer and CVD in 21,442 adults. The design and methods of COSMOS study were previously published [22,23].
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a study of 6814 subjects designed to study the prevalence and progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease. A detailed description of MESA was previously published [24].
The Women’s Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study (WACS) is a clinical trial designed to study the effects of several vitamins on cardiovascular outcomes in 8711 women. A detailed description of WACS was previously published [25].
The Women’s Health Study (WHS) is a clinical trial designed to assess the effects of aspirin and vitamin E on cardiovascular disease and cancer outcomes in 39,876 women. A detailed description was previously published [26].
The Physicians’ Health Study (PHS) I is a randomized trial designed to assess the effects of aspirin and beta-carotene on cardiovascular disease and cancer in 22,071 men. The PHS II is a trial designed to test the effects of vitamin supplements on cardiovascular disease and cancer. A detailed description of PHS I and II was previously published [27,28].
For the parent studies above, each study subject provided informed consent and each participating cohort was approved by the respective Institutional Review Boards. The current project was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Mass General Brigham (Protocol No. 2022P001795, PI: Luc Djousse).
Assessment of potato intake: The consumption of potatoes was assessed in each cohort using food questionnaires, including the CARDIA diet history questionnaire, Willett food frequency questionnaire, and Block questionnaire, which were previously validated [29,30,31,32]. The potato question specified the portion size, and each participant was asked to report the frequency of intake of various forms of potatoes over the previous 12 months as follows:
ARIC: At baseline, the participants reported their consumption of French-fried potatoes (4 oz); baked (1) or mashed potatoes (1 cup) potatoes; and potato chips or corn chips (a small bag or 1 oz).
CARDIA: The subjects were queried about their frequency of consumption of fried potatoes, including French fries (1 serving = 70 g); hash browns, pan fried potatoes, and potato tots (1 serving = half a cup); boiled (1 serving = half a cup); baked potatoes (1 serving = 1 medium); and other potatoes (1 serving = half a cup).
MESA: The participants reported their intake of French fries, fried potatoes, and hash browns; boiled/baked/mashed or other potatoes, and turnips; and potato chips and corn/tortilla chips. The subjects were provided with 3 portion sizes to choose from (small, medium, large).
COSMOS, PHS, WACS, and WHS: The subjects reported the frequency of consumption of French fries (serving size of 4 oz, except COSMOS, with 6 oz); baked/boiled (1) or mashed (1 cup) potatoes; and potato chips or corn chips (small bag or 1 oz).
We converted reported frequencies of potato consumption into servings per week using the midpoint for interval responses. For response categories with an open upper boundary, we multiplied the lower boundary by 1.5 [33]. For each subject, the total potato intake was obtained by summing the frequencies for fried, baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes. We kept the combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes as a single group. We did not have usable information on the intake of potato chips.
Assessment of CVD and HTN: Incident CVD was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death adjudicated by the cohort-specific endpoint committee. HTN was defined as systolic blood pressure of 140+ mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure of 90+ mm Hg, self-reported hypertension among healthcare professionals, physician-diagnosed HTN, or treatment for HTN. While all seven cohorts participated in CVD analyses, WACS and MESA did not have data on incident HTN for inclusion.
Covariates: Information on age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, education, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, dietary intake, comorbidity, and diet was obtained in each cohort at baseline.
Statistical analysis: Using a uniform data analysis plan, local investigators completed cohort-specific analyses and the results were meta-analyzed centrally. Covariate harmonization was implemented by participating investigators at the beginning of data analysis, inclusive of decision on whether covariates would be continuous or categorical using cohort-specific categories or quintiles. For CVD (HTN) analyses, subjects with prevalent CVD (HTN) or with missing data on potatoes were excluded. For the primary analysis, the total potato categories were <1, 1–2, >2 to 3, >3 to <5, and 5+ servings per week. For the method of potato preparation, the categories were <0.5, 0.5 to 1, >1 to 3, and >3 servings/week for combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes and 0, >0 to 1, and >1 servings/week for fried potatoes. Cox regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After the unadjusted model, we fitted a multivariable model controlled for demographics and lifestyle factors. For CVD analyses, we also adjusted for prevalent hypertension and type 2 diabetes. For hypertension analyses, we also controlled for prevalent diabetes. Hazard ratios obtained from cohort-specific analyses were used for fixed-effect meta-analyses using inverse weighted variance [34]. We assessed heterogeneity using Q statistic, I-squared, and visualized using Galbraith plot in STATA SE, version 15. A two-sided p value was used with an alpha level of 0.05.

3. Results

A total sample of 110,063 subjects from seven cohorts was used for CVD analyses with 35.2% men and a mean age at baseline ranging from 25.1 (CARDIA) to 72.0 years (COSMOS). The mean total potato consumption ranged from 1.9 (MESA) to 4.2 (CARDIA) servings per week. Since MESA and WACS did not have data on incident HTN, only 67,146 subjects were used for HTN analyses. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Potato intake and CVD risk: There was no association of total potato consumption with the risk of CVD: HRs (95% CI) of 1.0 (reference), 0.98 (0.92–1.04); 0.98 (0.89–1.07); 0.95 (0.89–1.01); and 0.96 (0.89–1.04) for total potato consumption of <1, 1–2, >2 to 3, >3 to <5, and 5+ servings per week, respectively, adjusting for demographic factors, BMI, energy intake, education, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, prevalent hypertension and diabetes, fruit and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain products, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available) (Figure 1). In secondary analyses, neither the consumption of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes (Supplemental Figure S1) nor that of fried potatoes (Supplemental Figure S2) were associated with CVD risk.
Potato consumption and HTN risk: Total potato consumption was not associated with the risk of HTN (Figure 2).
Likewise, the consumption of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes was not associated with HTN risk (Supplemental Figure S3). However, the intake of fried potatoes was associated with a higher risk of HTN: HRs (95% CI) were 1.0 (reference), 1.04 (1.02–1.07), and 1.10 (1.04–1.17) for fried potato consumption of 0, >0 to 1, and >1 servings/week, respectively (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

In this meta-analysis of seven large prospective US cohorts, we found that total potato consumption was not associated with the risk of CVD after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Similar results were observed for combined baked, boiled, and mashed or fried potatoes. Furthermore, while the consumption of total and combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes was not associated with the risk of HTN, the intake of fried potatoes was associated with a higher risk of HTN.

4.1. Potato Consumption and Risk of CVD

A lack of an association of potato consumption with CVD risk in our study is consistent with the findings from two Swedish cohorts where total potato consumption was not associated with CVD risk [RR = 1.0 (95% CI: (0.97–1.02) per 3 servings/week increment in total potatoes] [35] and data from the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals’ Follow-up study, which showed no association of potato intake with the incidence of ischemic stroke [17]. A Norwegian study also reported no association of total potato consumption with fatal myocardial infarction and CVD death after 33 years of follow-up [18]. A meta-analysis of five and six studies reported no association of total potato intake with coronary heart disease [RR = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.95–1.09)] and stroke [RR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88–1.08)], respectively, comparing the highest to the lowest category of total potato consumption [16].
Few studies have evaluated the association of baked, boiled, and mashed potato consumption with CVD risk. In Swedish cohorts, the consumption of boiled potatoes was not associated with the risk of CVD, myocardial infarction, stroke, or CVD death [35]. In the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study, the consumption of baked or mashed potatoes was not associated with coronary artery calcification after adjustment for potential confounding factors [36] among 2208 US adult men and women. In contrast, data from 148,671 participants of the Million Veteran Program showed a threshold relation of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potato consumption with the risk of coronary heart disease with no association observed with an intake below 5 cups/week and 27% higher risk (95% CI: 9% to 47%) for Veterans consuming 5+ cups/week compared to <1 cup/month [19]. The reasons for inconsistent findings between US veterans and the general population are unclear and merit further investigation.
Little is known about the association of fried potato consumption with CVD risk. Our findings of no association of fried potato consumption with CVD risk are consistent with data from Larsson et al. [35], who reported no association between fried potato consumption and the risk of total CVD, myocardial infarction, or stroke in the Swedish population: compared to fried potato intake of ≤3 times per month, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for total CVD was 0.90 (0.71–1.14) in subjects consuming fried potatoes 5+ times per week.

4.2. Potato Consumption and Risk of HTN

Our meta-analysis of five US cohorts showed no association between total potato consumption and the incidence of HTN, and these findings are in line with a previous meta-analysis of four studies showing no association between total potato consumption and the risk of HTN [RR = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.92–1.29), I2 = 71%) when comparing the highest to the lowest category of total potato consumption] [16]. Very few studies have evaluated associations of baked, boiled, mashed, or fried potatoes with HTN risk. We showed in our data that the consumption of fried but not baked/boiled/mashed potatoes was associated with a modest elevated risk of HTN. Consistent with our findings, Schwingshackl et al. [16] reported in a previous meta-analysis that the consumption of fried [RR per 150 g/d: 1.37 (1.15–1.21)] but not baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes [RR = 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96–1.21) per 150 g/d] was associated with a higher risk of HTN. Fried potatoes may increase energy density and lead to obesity with subsequent development of HTN. It is also possible that the consumption of fried potatoes is more likely to be associated with the consumption of other food items known to raise blood pressure, including red meat, ultra-processed foods, and trans fats [37,38,39,40,41]. Added salt to fried potatoes may also contribute to a higher risk of HTN, given the blood-pressure-raising effect of salt [5,42,43,44].

4.3. Study Limitations and Strengths

The limitations of the current study include its observational design and the inability to completely exclude residual and/or unmeasured confounding as a partial explanation of our findings. Furthermore, potato consumption was assessed only at baseline in many cohorts and we were unable to account for potential changes in dietary habits over time. The paucity of data on the method of preparation of potatoes limits our ability to conduct robust analyses stratified by baked, boiled, and mashed alone. Since all analyzed cohorts are from the US, our results may not be generalizable to other regions of the world where food items usually consumed with potatoes, especially fried potatoes, may differ. Moreover, we lacked data on the food composition of potato-containing meals for our analyses. Since potato chips were combined with other forms of chips (i.e., tortilla or corn) in most cohorts studied, we made the decision not to include potato chips in our exposure assessment; hence, we may have underestimated the true amount of total potato consumed. Despite the above limitations, our study has several strengths, including a prospective design; a large sample size to detect small effect sizes; geographic and racial diversity of the study population; the use of harmonized and single analytical plan for cohort-specific analyses; and the availability of data on relevant potential confounding factors.

5. Conclusions

Our data showed that the total consumption of potato was not associated with CVD or HTN risk. In secondary analyses, baked, boiled, and mashed potato consumption was not associated with CVD or HTN, while fried potato intake was associated with a higher risk of HTN but not CVD risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu17030451/s1, Figure S1. Forest plot depicting adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CVD comparing intakes of various levels of baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes to none. Figure S2. Forest plot showing adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for hypertension comparing intakes of various levels of baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes to none. Figure S3. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CVD comparing intakes of fried potatoes (>0 to ≤1 and >1 servings/week) to none.

Author Contributions

L.D. designed the research and drafted the manuscript; L.D., H.D.S., I.-M.L., J.E.B., R.L.M., J.M.G., L.M.S. and J.E.M. conducted the research; L.D., X.Z., J.L. and E.K. analyzed the data; and L.D., H.D.S., I.-M.L., J.E.B., L.M.S. and J.E.M. made substantial contributions to this paper; L.D. had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant from the Alliance Potato Research and Education (PI: L Djousse). Funding for participating cohorts: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract Nos. (75N92022D00001, 75N92022D00002, 75N92022D00003, 75N92022D00004, 75N92022D00005). The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. CARDIA The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) is supported by contracts HHSN268201800003I, HHSN268201800004I, HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800006I, and HHSN268201800007I from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. COSMOS is supported by an investigator-initiated grant from Mars Edge, a segment of Mars Incorporated dedicated to nutrition research and products, which included infrastructure support. COSMOS is also supported in part by grants AG050657, AG071611, EY025623, and HL157665 at the NIH and contracts 75N92021D00001, 75N92021D00002, 75N92021D00003, 75N92021D00004, and 75N92021D00005 through the Women’s Health Initiative at the NIH. MESA was supported by contracts 75N92020D00001, HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, 75N92020D00005, N01-HC-95160, 75N92020D00002, N01-HC-95161, 75N92020D00003, N01-HC-95162, 75N92020D00006, N01-HC-95163, 75N92020D00004, N01-HC-95164, 75N92020D00007, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168 and N01-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and by grants UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001420 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. This paper has been reviewed and approved by the MESA Publications and Presentations Committee. PHS was funded by grants CA 097193, CA 34944, CA 40360, HL 26490, and HL 34595 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). WACS was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. WHS was funded by NIH grants CA047988, CA182913, HL043851, HL080467, and HL099355.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Brigham and Women’s Hospital (protocol 2022P001795 and last approval on 26 July 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Since the current project involved analyses of existing data, informed consent was waived by the Brigham and Women’s Institutional Review Board. However, parent studies/clinical trials that collected original data obtained informed consent from each study subject.

Data Availability Statement

CARDIA complies with the data-sharing requirements of the National Institutes of Health by providing limited-access data sets from various CARDIA examinations to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute BioLINCC. Data from CARDIA and ARIC are available through BioLINCC.

Conflicts of Interest

L.D. received investigator-initiated grant from the Alliance for Potato Research and Education (PI), Novartis, and US Highbush Blueberry Council. The sponsor had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of this study.

Abbreviations

ARICAtherosclerosis Risk in Communities
CARDIAThe Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study
CIConfidence Interval
COSMOSCOcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study
CVDCardiovascular Disease
HRHazard Ratio
HTNHypertension
MESAMulti-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
PHSPhysicians’ Health Study
RRRelative Risk
T2DType 2 Diabetes
WACSThe Women’s Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study
WHSWomen’s Health Study

References

  1. Tsao, C.W.; Aday, A.W.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Arora, P.; Avery, C.L.; Baker-Smith, C.M.; Beaton, A.Z.; Boehme, A.K.; Buxton, A.E.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023, 147, e93–e621. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Ferdinand, K.C.; Norris, K.C.; Rodbard, H.W.; Trujillo, J.M. Humanistic and Economic Burden of Patients with Cardiorenal Metabolic Conditions: A Systematic Review. Diabetes Ther. 2023, 14, 1979–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramamoorthy, V.; Chan, K.; Roy, M.; Saxena, A.; Ahmed, M.A.; Zhang, Z.; Appunni, S.; Thomas, R.; McGranaghan, P.; McDermott, M.; et al. Healthcare expenditure trends among adult stroke patients in the United States, 2011–2020. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2023, 32, 107333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, V.; Ning, H.; Allen, N.; Kershaw, K.; Khan, S.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Wilkins, J.T. Lifetime Risks for Hypertension by Contemporary Guidelines in African American and White Men and Women. JAMA Cardiol. 2019, 4, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Appel, L.J.; Moore, T.J.; Obarzanek, E.; Vollmer, W.M.; Svetkey, L.P.; Sacks, F.M.; Bray, G.A.; Vogt, T.M.; Cutler, J.A.; Windhauser, M.M.; et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Conlin, P.R.; Chow, D.; Miller, E.R., 3rd; Svetkey, L.P.; Lin, P.H.; Harsha, D.W.; Moore, T.J.; Sacks, F.M.; Appel, L.J. The effect of dietary patterns on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: Results from the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) trial. Am. J. Hypertens. 2000, 13, 949–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kokkinos, P.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Polychronopoulos, E. Dietary influences on blood pressure: The effect of the Mediterranean diet on the prevalence of hypertension. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2005, 7, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Toledo, E.; Hu, F.B.; Estruch, R.; Buil-Cosiales, P.; Corella, D.; Salas-Salvado, J.; Covas, M.I.; Aros, F.; Gomez-Gracia, E.; Fiol, M.; et al. Effect of the Mediterranean diet on blood pressure in the PREDIMED trial: Results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Lorgeril, M.; Salen, P.; Martin, J.L.; Mamelle, N.; Monjaud, I.; Touboul, P.; Delaye, J. Effect of a mediterranean type of diet on the rate of cardiovascular complications in patients with coronary artery disease. Insights into the cardioprotective effect of certain nutriments. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996, 28, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sotos-Prieto, M.; Bhupathiraju, S.N.; Mattei, J.; Fung, T.T.; Li, Y.; Pan, A.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B.; Hu, F.B. Changes in Diet Quality Scores and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among US Men and Women. Circulation 2015, 132, 2212–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Hernandez Hernandez, A. Effect of the Mediterranean diet in cardiovascular prevention. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2024, 77, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Estruch, R.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Corella, D.; Salas-Salvado, J.; Ruiz-Gutierrez, V.; Covas, M.I.; Fiol, M.; Gomez-Gracia, E.; Lopez-Sabater, M.C.; Vinyoles, E.; et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 145, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, S.; Yang, Y.M.; Zhu, J.; Wang, L.L.; Xu, W.; Lyu, S.Q.; Wang, J.; Shao, X.H.; Zhang, H. Association between adherence to life’s simple 7 metrics and risk of obstructive sleep apnea among adults in the United States. BMC Psychiatry 2024, 24, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zaheer, K.; Akhtar, M.H. Potato Production, Usage, and Nutrition—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Anderson, G.H.; Soeandy, C.D.; Smith, C.E. White vegetables: Glycemia and satiety. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 356S–367S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schwingshackl, L.; Schwedhelm, C.; Hoffmann, G.; Boeing, H. Potatoes and risk of chronic disease: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 2243–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Joshipura, K.J.; Ascherio, A.; Manson, J.E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Rimm, E.B.; Speizer, F.E.; Hennekens, C.H.; Spiegelman, D.; Willett, W.C. Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA 1999, 282, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Arnesen, E.K.; Laake, I.; Carlsen, M.H.; Veierod, M.B.; Retterstol, K. Potato Consumption and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality—A Long-Term Follow-Up of a Norwegian Cohort. J. Nutr. 2024, 154, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bodar, V.; Ho, Y.L.; Cho, K.; Gagnon, D.; Gaziano, J.M.; Djousse, L. Consumption of potatoes and incidence rate of coronary artery disease: The Million Veteran Program. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 42, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wright, J.D.; Folsom, A.R.; Coresh, J.; Sharrett, A.R.; Couper, D.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; Mosley, T.H.; Jr Ballantyne, C.M.; Boerwinkle, E.A.; Rosamond, W.D.; et al. The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) Study: JACC Focus Seminar 3/8. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 77, 2939–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Friedman, G.D.; Cutter, G.R.; Donahue, R.P.; Hughes, G.H.; Hulley, S.B.; Jacobs, D.R., Jr.; Liu, K.; Savage, P.J. CARDIA: Study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1988, 41, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sesso, H.D.; Rist, P.M.; Aragaki, A.K.; Rautiainen, S.; Johnson, L.G.; Friedenberg, G.; Copeland, T.; Clar, A.; Mora, S.; Moorthy, M.V.; et al. Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: The COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 115, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rist, P.M.; Sesso, H.D.; Johnson, L.G.; Aragaki, A.K.; Wang, L.; Rautiainen, S.; Hazra, A.; Tobias, D.K.; LeBoff, M.S.; Schroeter, H.; et al. Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS). Contemp. Clin. Trials 2022, 116, 106728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bild, D.E.; Bluemke, D.A.; Burke, G.L.; Detrano, R.; Diez Roux, A.V.; Folsom, A.R.; Greenland, P.; Jacob, D.R., Jr.; Kronmal, R.; Liu, K.; et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and design. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 156, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Djousse, L.; Cook, N.R.; Kim, E.; Bodar, V.; Walter, J.; Bubes, V.; Luttmann-Gibson, H.; Mora, S.; Joseph, J.; Lee, I.M.; et al. Supplementation With Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Incidence of Heart Failure Hospitalization: VITAL-Heart Failure. Circulation 2020, 141, 784–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, I.M.; Cook, N.R.; Gaziano, J.M.; Gordon, D.; Ridker, P.M.; Manson, J.E.; Hennekens, C.H.; Buring, J.E. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: The Women’s Health Study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005, 294, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 321, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sesso, H.D.; Buring, J.E.; Christen, W.G.; Kurth, T.; Belanger, C.; MacFadyen, J.; Bubes, V.; Manson, J.E.; Glynn, R.J.; Gaziano, J.M. Vitamins E and C in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: The Physicians’ Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008, 300, 2123–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Subar, A.F.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Hurwitz, P.; McNutt, S.; McIntosh, A.; Rosenfeld, S. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: The Eating at America’s Table Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 154, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subar, A.F.; Dodd, K.W.; Guenther, P.M.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; McDowell, M.; Tooze, J.A.; Freedman, L.S.; Krebs-Smith, S.M. The food propensity questionnaire: Concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2006, 106, 1556–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stein, A.D.; Shea, S.; Basch, C.E.; Contento, I.R.; Zybert, P. Consistency of the Willett semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour dietary recalls in estimating nutrient intakes of preschool children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992, 135, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rimm, E.B.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Stampfer, M.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Litin, L.B.; Willett, W.C. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992, 135, 1114–1126; discussion 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, L.; Gan, Y.; Wu, C.; Qu, X.; Sun, G.; Lu, Z. Coffee consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. DerSimonian, R.; Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin. Trials 1986, 7, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Larsson, S.C.; Wolk, A. Potato consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: 2 prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qavi, A.H.; Zhou, G.; Ward, R.E.; Carr, J.J.; Ellison, R.C.; Arnett, D.K.; Gaziano, J.M.; Djousse, L. Association of potato consumption with calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries: The NHLBI Family Heart Study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2023, 33, 2413–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rivera, N.; Du, S.; Bernard, L.; Kim, H.; Matsushita, K.; Rebholz, C.M. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Incident Hypertension in US Middle-Aged Adults. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2024, 13, e035189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, J.; Sun, X.; Li, M.; Luo, R.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Akkaif, M.A.; Liu, H. Dietary factors in relation to hypertension: A mendelian randomization study. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2024, 43, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lajous, M.; Bijon, A.; Fagherazzi, G.; Rossignol, E.; Boutron-Ruault, M.C.; Clavel-Chapelon, F. Processed and unprocessed red meat consumption and hypertension in women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 948–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Allen, T.S.; Bhatia, H.S.; Wood, A.C.; Momin, S.R.; Allison, M.A. State-of-the-Art Review: Evidence on Red Meat Consumption and Hypertension Outcomes. Am. J. Hypertens. 2022, 35, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luan, M.; Tian, Y.; Yan, D.; Liang, S. Association of plasma trans fatty acid concentrations with blood pressure and hypertension in U.S. adults. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1373095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Takase, M.; Nakaya, N.; Tanno, K.; Kogure, M.; Hatanaka, R.; Nakaya, K.; Chiba, I.; Kanno, I.; Nochioka, K.; Tsuchiya, N.; et al. Relationship between traditional risk factors for hypertension and systolic blood pressure in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-based Cohort Study. Hypertens. Res. 2024, 47, 1533–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xun, R.; Gao, Y.; Zhen, S.; Mao, T.; Xia, H.; Zhang, H.; Sun, G. Effects of Behavioral Interventions for Salt Reduction on Blood Pressure and Urinary Sodium Excretion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Glob. Heart 2023, 18, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tsai, Y.C.; Tsao, Y.P.; Huang, C.J.; Tai, Y.H.; Su, Y.C.; Chiang, C.E.; Sung, S.H.; Chen, C.H.; Cheng, H.M. Effectiveness of salt substitute on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2022, 24, 1147–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Forest plot depicting the association of the total potato intake with the incidence of CVD in seven cohorts. Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent hypertension and diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Figure 1. Forest plot depicting the association of the total potato intake with the incidence of CVD in seven cohorts. Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent hypertension and diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Nutrients 17 00451 g001
Figure 2. Forest plot depicting the association of total potato intake with the incidence of HTN in five cohorts; Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Figure 2. Forest plot depicting the association of total potato intake with the incidence of HTN in five cohorts; Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Nutrients 17 00451 g002
Figure 3. Forest plot depicting the association of fried potato intake with HTN risk in five cohorts. Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Figure 3. Forest plot depicting the association of fried potato intake with HTN risk in five cohorts. Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, prevalent diabetes, fruits and vegetables, red/processed meat, whole grain, sugar-sweetened beverages, nuts/peanut butter, legumes, and trans fatty acids (when available).
Nutrients 17 00451 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of seven cohorts analyzed for potato consumption and risk of CVD *.
Table 1. Characteristics of seven cohorts analyzed for potato consumption and risk of CVD *.
CharacteristicsCohorts
ARIC
(n = 15,106)
CARDIA
(n = 4042)
COSMOS
(n = 19,532)
MESA
(n = 6215)
PHS
(n = 19,709)
WACS
(n = 6163)
WHS
(n = 39,296)
Age (y)54.2 ± 5.825.1 ± 3.572.1 ± 6.662.4 ± 10.366.3 ± 9.260.0 ± 8.854.6 ± 7.1
Sex (% women)55.457.260.752.90100100
White race (%)73.053.688.561.692.094.194.9
African American (%)26.646.45.026.40.813.002.24
Body mass index (kg/m2)27.7 ± 5.424.5 ± 5.027.6 ± 5.428.2 ± 5.425.8 ± 3.430.9 ± 6.826.0 ± 5.1
Energy intake (kcal)1614 ± 5662384 ± 8591613 ± 6181607 ± 7161687 ± 5211736 ± 5541726 ± 535
Total potatoes (serv/week) 2.84 ± 2.344.30 ± 4.012.18 ± 2.331.85 ± 1.842.49 ± 2.172.99 ± 2.472.73 ± 2.17
Baked/mashed/boiled potatoes (serv/week)2.11 ± 1.972.41 ± 2.991.71 ± 2.051.22 ± 1.341.93 ± 1.792.50 ± 2.212.29 ± 1.96
Fried potatoes (serv/week)0.73 ± 1.081.89 ± 2.460.46 ± 0.760.62 ± 1.030.57 ± 0.930.48 ± 0.870.44 ± 0.71
Alcohol intake (drinks/week)3.0 ± 6.61.78 ± 1.97n/a4.01 ± 8.41n/an/an/a
Physical activity (MET-H/week or score)2.43 ± 0.79400.5 ± 284.924.0 ± 25.094.7 ± 97.5 n/an/a14.5 ± 18.3
Fruit and vegetables (serv/week)32.3 ± 17.936.4 ± 24.739.4 ± 28.430.7 ± 18.323.6 ± 14.436.8 ± 22.535.4 ± 21.8
Whole grain intake (serv/week)8.48 ± 8.2510.44 ± 10.226.48 ± 6.345.46 ± 4.9911.8 ± 11.89.60 ± 8.6010.4 ± 8.9
Red/processed meats (serv/week)7.30 ± 5.0630.1 ± 22.36.01 ± 5.585.47 ± 4.176.05 ± 5.117.10 ± 5.756.29 ± 5.04
Sugar-sweetened beverages (serv/week)3.63 ± 6.6711.7 ± 13.21.23 ± 3.502.75 ± 6.042.02 ± 3.912.53 ± 5.7122.1 ± 12.2
Legumes (serv/week)0.78 ± 1.171.60 ± 3.563.28 ± 3.942.78 ± 4.263.68 ± 3.363.33 ± 3.003.06 ± 2.75
Nuts/peanut butter (serv/week)0.88 ± 1.853.57 ± 6.815.08 ± 6.771.82 ± 2.761.86 ± 2.801.27 ± 2.141.32 ± 2.16
Trans fat intake (g/d)2.88 ± 1.73n/a0.85 ± 0.283.41 ± 2.281.72 ± 0.69n/a2.28 ± 1.06
Prevalent hypertension (%)53.533.758.444.945.673.725.8
Prevalent diabetes (%)21.68.714.212.57.019.22.85
* ARIC: Atherosclerosis Risk in Community; CARDIA: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study; MESA: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; n/a: Not available; PHS: Physicians’ Health Study; COSMOS: COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study; WACS: The Women’s Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study; WHS: Women’s Health Study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Djousse, L.; Zhou, X.; Lim, J.; Kim, E.; Sesso, H.D.; Lee, I.-M.; Buring, J.E.; McClelland, R.L.; Gaziano, J.M.; Steffen, L.M.; et al. Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts. Nutrients 2025, 17, 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030451

AMA Style

Djousse L, Zhou X, Lim J, Kim E, Sesso HD, Lee I-M, Buring JE, McClelland RL, Gaziano JM, Steffen LM, et al. Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts. Nutrients. 2025; 17(3):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Djousse, Luc, Xia Zhou, Jaewon Lim, Eunjung Kim, Howard D. Sesso, I-Min Lee, Julie E. Buring, Robyn L. McClelland, John Michael Gaziano, Lyn M. Steffen, and et al. 2025. "Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts" Nutrients 17, no. 3: 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030451

APA Style

Djousse, L., Zhou, X., Lim, J., Kim, E., Sesso, H. D., Lee, I.-M., Buring, J. E., McClelland, R. L., Gaziano, J. M., Steffen, L. M., & Manson, J. E. (2025). Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts. Nutrients, 17(3), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop