Next Article in Journal
Shining a Light on Colibactin Biology
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Ochratoxin A in Lebanese Students and Its Urinary Biomarker Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Quo vadis Cardiac Glycoside Research?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas

1
Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Department of Bioanalysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2021, 13(5), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345
Submission received: 20 April 2021 / Revised: 4 May 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxin Biomarkers: Innovation and Utility)

Abstract

Biomonitoring of biological samples arises as an effective tool to evaluate the exposure to mycotoxins in the population. Owing to the wide range of advantages, there is a growing interest in the use of non- and minimally invasive alternative sampling strategies, such as dried blood spot sampling or volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS). A VAMS-based multi-mycotoxin method was developed and validated for 24 different mycotoxins. Method validation was based on the Bioanalytical Method Validation Guideline of the Food and Drug Administration from the United States and for most of the studied mycotoxins, the results of the performance characteristics were in agreement with the criteria of the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. The recovery for the different mycotoxins was not haematocrit dependent and remained acceptable after storing the VAMS for 7 and 21 days at refrigeration temperature (4 °C) and room temperature, demonstrating that VAMS could be applied to assess mycotoxin exposure in blood in resource-limited areas, where there may be a delay between sampling and analysis. Finally, a comparison between VAMS and a procedure for liquid whole blood analysis, performed on 20 different blood samples, did not result in missed exposed cases for VAMS. Moreover, both methods detected similar levels of ochratoxin A, ochratoxin alpha, zearalenone and aflatoxin B1. Given all the benefits associated with VAMS and the developed method, VAMS sampling may serve as an alternative to conventional venous sampling to evaluate multiple mycotoxin exposure.
Keywords: VAMS; multi-mycotoxin; mycotoxins; exposure; biomonitoring VAMS; multi-mycotoxin; mycotoxins; exposure; biomonitoring

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vidal, A.; Belova, L.; Stove, C.; De Boevre, M.; De Saeger, S. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas. Toxins 2021, 13, 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345

AMA Style

Vidal A, Belova L, Stove C, De Boevre M, De Saeger S. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas. Toxins. 2021; 13(5):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vidal, Arnau, Lidia Belova, Christophe Stove, Marthe De Boevre, and Sarah De Saeger. 2021. "Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas" Toxins 13, no. 5: 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345

APA Style

Vidal, A., Belova, L., Stove, C., De Boevre, M., & De Saeger, S. (2021). Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas. Toxins, 13(5), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop